Could Anti-gravity Really be Possible?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 เม.ย. 2024
  • brilliant.org/CuriousDroid
    Anti-gravity is one of those controversial subjects that some say is more in the realm of science fiction than science fact with many physicists saying it's just not theoretically possible while others are busy trying to find theories that would allow it to be possible.
    In this video, we look at some of the things that we thought were anti-gravity but turned out not to be and what could be our nearest discovery with the vailidation of Einstein's predictions of space and gravity warping.
    This video is sponsored by Brilliant.org : brilliant.org/CuriousDroid
    Presented by
    Paul Shillito
    Written & Researched
    By Paul Shillito
    Images and footage : NASA, ESA, ESO, Boeing, Cambridge University, Claude Poher, Filipe V S, B-Bro, Lab Rat, Edemuz, Tek Nome, UToledoPhysAstro, www.iaa.csic.es, U.S. NAVY SEAL AND SWCC SCOUT TEAM
    Music from the TH-cam library
    Mind And Eye Journey by Emily A. Sprague
    Nidra in the Sky with Ayler by Jesse Gallagher
    Dreaming Blue by Sextile
    Timelapsed Tides by Asher Fulero
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 9K

  • @Procrastinater
    @Procrastinater 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3777

    "I have created an anti gravity device"
    US: military:
    "It's mine now, also it does not exist"

    • @YDDES
      @YDDES 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Of course, it doesn’t exist. Don’t You know, the gravity is created by mass?

    • @DeathBYDesign666
      @DeathBYDesign666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +127

      YDDES Of course there is the missing piece of the puzzle of what it is in that mass that creates the gravity in the first place. Maybe there are a few that have cracked the code and got buried in the bureaucratic red tape or buried all together for "reasons of national security" or whatever other reasons they can dream up. Not unlike what you have done but can't shed any further light on I'll bet.
      Don't get me wrong I am a skeptic when it comes to things like flat earth (because it's stupid low hanging fruit and easily debunked) but some things are not so easily explained away. There are precedents that are official yet not explained, but also aren't acknowledged by skeptics in any way shape or form.
      I always challenge the skeptics to reply but they always decline, it doesn't seem right to me. I make this type of comment about once a week in much larger threads fyi, and still nothing.

    • @springbloom5940
      @springbloom5940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@YDDES
      *CITATION NEEDED*

    • @itachi_uchiha1538
      @itachi_uchiha1538 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      behemuth would you rather have a greedy business owner who ordered the assisination of his partner to gain so much money he controls the world

    • @Procrastinater
      @Procrastinater 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@itachi_uchiha1538 Thats a pretty movie-esque hypotechical. It's almost like it is completely made up nonsense that never has and doubtfully ever will occur in human history.
      Also, I would not trust the US military any more than i would trust the Chinese military.

  • @d3r4g45
    @d3r4g45 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1858

    So Ning Li: this is a way to make anti gravity
    5 years later: nope, doesn't work
    leaves University and starts company of the "thing that doesn't work".
    Gets awarded grant from defense for the same "thing that doesn't work".
    Nowhere to be seen afterwards...

    • @countzero1136
      @countzero1136 4 ปีที่แล้ว +164

      Have you checked Area 51?

    • @shinjisan2015
      @shinjisan2015 4 ปีที่แล้ว +135

      it may not work for anti-gravity.... but she clearly found another use for it. ;)

    • @agsystems8220
      @agsystems8220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +206

      If it is storing energy, the DoD would be interested. It could be used as a non chemical battery, even if it has no effect on gravity at all. That potentially sidesteps the theoretical maximum we are running into with regards to chemical energy storage. A battery with 10x the storage of current batteries would permit aircraft with longer range and no infra red signature.
      That is even before we consider the destructive uses of it. Conservation of energy means that the energy stored is dissipated rapidly if confinement is lost. Unlike a conventional battery with two chemicals separated by a barrier, this has spinning bits kept from crashing by cold and quantum mechanics. If it breaks, it goes bang. 10x current battery storage would make it double up as an explosive with more energy than anything currently available. The energy not being chemical also means we don't run into chemistry based temperature limits. Get it to 100x storage and most of the energy would be X-rays. That could potentially replace a fission device as the primary in a hydrogen bomb. There goes all the nuclear safeguards, as those rely on limiting fission primaries.
      If they have demonstrated a way to pump energy into a system that doesn't have well understood theoretical limits, the DoD will put money into finding those limits. The cost of letting somebody else find something amazing first with regards to energy storage is way too high a risk.

    • @lucofparis4819
      @lucofparis4819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      Given the number of bullshit science "discoveries" your DoD has funded, I wouldn't be surprised to discover it doesn't work, period.
      Also: when the military find a game changer, they use it. _Always._ The fact they didn't speaks volumes. It's a dead end, like all those other "secret projects" that led to nothing.

    • @user-st4pj8vo9b
      @user-st4pj8vo9b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      @@agsystems8220 I was going to rant about this underrated comment, then I saw it's posted 10 mins ago.
      So yeah. This event doesn't prove the scientist found anti-gravity, but it proves she found something of great potential value. I'm sure we will find about it a couple of decades when it gets declassified and put into smarphones.

  • @questioneverythingalways820
    @questioneverythingalways820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Actually enjoyed the relatively accurate explanation of current theories. Hate when people assume they are “proven” generally just because of mathematics.

    • @bertram-raven
      @bertram-raven ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Identifying areas of science:
      If it is green and wiggles, it is Biology.
      If it is smelly, it is Chemistry.
      If it does not work, it is Physics.
      If it is absolute and yet somehow exceedingly vague and fluffy, it is mathematics.

    • @SLOBeachboy
      @SLOBeachboy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      While the general public may make such assumptions (and those public assumptions are rarely based on math), physicists do not. Physicists never assume that a prevailing theory is the gospel or that it is set in stone. That is simply not how they think. At the same time however they also realize some of these theories can be extremely useful even before they are proven to be 100% correct. In fact theoretical physics is responsible for many technological breakthroughs which have in turn brought us many of our modern conveniences.
      As for some lay people insisting that some theories have been proven to be completely correct when they have not, this can definitely be annoying at times. Still, this is not nearly as annoying as the people on the flip side of that coin. I’m referring of course to people who are so ignorant and pig headed that they will even deny that natural laws are proven facts. For example they might insist that perpetual motion - and thus energy from nothing - is possible when in fact it is not possible in this universe as such a thing would violate the laws of physics (laws, not theories). These people are not necessarily all completely unintelligent of course but rather the are just highly irrational and because of this their opinions are always based on what they need to believe rather than on the facts. These types also tend to be conspiracy theorists more often than not. In any case there is no point in trying to reason with them and trying to do so is just an exercise in futility.

    • @harryhoudini714
      @harryhoudini714 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SLOBeachboy finally someone who knows what he is talking about! kudos!

  • @frankkolmann4801
    @frankkolmann4801 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Thank you. Rare to find a presenter as good as you. Understand gravity before ever finding antigravity.

  • @AinsleyHarriott1
    @AinsleyHarriott1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    NASA: Whatcha got there?
    Dr Ning Li: A smoothie

  • @dennisvance4004
    @dennisvance4004 4 ปีที่แล้ว +512

    Thank you for treating this subject with the gravity it deserves.

    • @OhItsDared
      @OhItsDared 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Wow

    • @Hgulix62
      @Hgulix62 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I bet this comment will attract many likes in the futur

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Get out.

    • @Gordesm
      @Gordesm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha !

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      These are, indeed, weighty matters to consider. For some reason I find them quite attractive. I am however, at a loss as to why I keep falling for them.

  • @unequally-tempered
    @unequally-tempered 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This is a well researched and good presentation. Thanks so much for posting it.

  • @derrillyager7946
    @derrillyager7946 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    In the late 60s too early '70s my dad was studying electronics for the military they were using it to project variations in radar signals used at the time to protect B-52 bombers over Vietnam. He mentioned to me that there was a story about a device that could be attached to equipment to make it lighter and more easily moved. We hear a lot of stories and come in contact with many things throughout our lives.

    • @zz-nc5kx
      @zz-nc5kx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The operative word is “story”. I heard lots of stories in the Army.

    • @derrillyager7946
      @derrillyager7946 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@zz-nc5kx yes, I'm with you, but I find it amazing how many stories turn out to be true 10 years down the line.

    • @zz-nc5kx
      @zz-nc5kx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@derrillyager7946 Well, any story that implies the existence of anti gravity will not turn out to be true - ever.

    • @Grim_Azrael
      @Grim_Azrael 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@zz-nc5kx if you would have asked anyone about atomic energy 500 year’s ago he would have called you crazy. We don’t know what can be done in 500 year’s from today. The possibilities are endless.

    • @zz-nc5kx
      @zz-nc5kx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Grim_Azrael The possibilities may be endless but not anti gravity. It doesn’t exist and will never exist. Just like perpetual motion.

  • @radwizard
    @radwizard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +646

    Was already solved with buttered toast taped to the back of a cat.

    • @MilesB1975
      @MilesB1975 4 ปีที่แล้ว +102

      Purr-petual motion...

    • @steh8831
      @steh8831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      radwizard - By far the best comment. 😄👍

    • @slyseal2091
      @slyseal2091 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I do wonder, if the experiments on gravity in CERN are successful, will that mean a toast made of antimatter would actually land on the "right" side?

    • @njords77
      @njords77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@slyseal2091 It might do but only because it's that 'I can't believe it's not butter' inferior substitute.

    • @ryanspence5831
      @ryanspence5831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      If you add an additional openface sandwich and an open book then you have enough stators to make a perpetual rotational energy device

  • @brazenbull636
    @brazenbull636 4 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    5:20
    Sounds like she was figuring it out and her project went top secret..

    • @gamaximusaurelius8969
      @gamaximusaurelius8969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      and / or KIA

    • @SirNyanPanda
      @SirNyanPanda 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gamaximusaurelius8969 Why would she be killed?

    • @rollog1248
      @rollog1248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@gamaximusaurelius8969 KIA lol what? First of all in the military in assassinations we say 'liquidated' or 'dispatched', second if she was on to something they would recruit her and definitely not kill her.

    • @gamaximusaurelius8969
      @gamaximusaurelius8969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@rollog1248 Term fits the purpose. on other hand do you really think the gov going to hire everyone who comes up with an idea like that and gives a nice fat big pay check with a Porsche and villa on Malibu?? u must be naive mate. also, why hire if they already have the tech?? Can u prove the opposite?
      Tech like that would totally ruin the known economy. They not gonna give a chance to leak information to foreign forces therefore she is highly likely a liability.thats why...

    • @positronundervolt4799
      @positronundervolt4799 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rollog1248 Firstly, it's concerning that the military has more than one word for assassination. Secondly, if they already had the technology, they wouldn't want or need somebody else coming up with it.

  • @JonatasAdoM
    @JonatasAdoM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    "I have discovered anti gravity!"
    _Later_
    "No, no I have not! Just... just forget about it"
    That's a way to avoid accidents I guess.

    • @generaza7609
      @generaza7609 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are like that "Dizzy" character. He discovered Anti-Gravity after falling out of a tree and breaking his leg. He has been "anti-gravity" ever since. Perhaps the men in black threw him off the tree?

  • @FalconFastest123
    @FalconFastest123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    I'm calling it: the recently released videos of UFOs are top secret antigravity machines made by Ning Li for the Department of Defense.

    • @millhouse782
      @millhouse782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      but if the feds have admitted they’ve been documenting them since at least the 70’s, who knew about the tech 20 years before Ning Li?

    • @thehillbillygamer2183
      @thehillbillygamer2183 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Oh I bet the department of defense and Boeing DARPA but they're working on it

    • @pauldavidhaynes8243
      @pauldavidhaynes8243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@millhouse782 Superconductors have been around since the 1950s, do you think nobody bothered to see if they affected gravity untill a few years ago..... nay

    • @sonaranipandey7693
      @sonaranipandey7693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      same here dude

    • @maximilianavdeev7363
      @maximilianavdeev7363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is literally what Bob Lazar has been saying since the day he came out with his claims. That the craft that the government have use some kind of anti-gravity technology powered by element 115.

  • @nightruler666
    @nightruler666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +257

    "I have created an anti gravity device"
    *Homeland security would like to know your location*

    • @allenjenkins7947
      @allenjenkins7947 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      They already know.

    • @ivgotballsofsteel4048
      @ivgotballsofsteel4048 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      more like, H S get down and shut up, in the middle of the night after the power randomly cuts out

    • @clairpahlavi
      @clairpahlavi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allenjenkins7947 : The interagency memo was circulated already.
      Refer to NSA doc 20191108-0735DC3Gw463rAsz362178054447-aqc32

    • @AJsAdventuresinAsia
      @AJsAdventuresinAsia 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      THEY KNOW YOUR LOCATION....THAT'S EASY

    • @fanfare100
      @fanfare100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@allenjenkins7947 Next: "They think they know. That's just a decoy. I have developed a teleportation device." XD

  • @flashkraft
    @flashkraft 3 ปีที่แล้ว +259

    Ning Li was last seen flying a Tic tac shaped UFO off the coast of San Diego.

    • @beeter3588
      @beeter3588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Alabama Woman leads F-18s on “UFO chase”

    • @thememoryhole9355
      @thememoryhole9355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      She was also seen at a zoo in China, munching on bamboo .. Oh that was Ling-Ling! So sorry.

    • @galaxystar527
      @galaxystar527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Let me guess...it tasted like mint?

    • @rayoperator2699
      @rayoperator2699 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not this again.

    • @michaelvallin55
      @michaelvallin55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@thememoryhole9355 Racist morons everywhere..

  • @Tufrmone
    @Tufrmone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Excellent presentation. This is very educational and deserves to be widely viewed.

  • @mendonisstudios
    @mendonisstudios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good summary with clarifying explanations. Well done.

  • @drewskiidrew6258
    @drewskiidrew6258 4 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    Anti Gravity: *Exists*
    DoD: "Not anymore."

    • @JeanLucCaptain
      @JeanLucCaptain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Star trek: exists
      CBS: NOT ANY MORE.

    • @lillyanneserrelio2187
      @lillyanneserrelio2187 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@JeanLucCaptain Damn right. I boycotted CBS so they'd know not to take Advantage of us loyal trek fans but I was sad to hear so many weak willed people gave in and forked over CBS's subscription fee just to watch 1 tv series in real time. They couldnt even wait a few years to see it free thru syndication. They may live long but with such weak wills, they clearly will not prosper. CBS U make Ferengis look honest!

    • @Enterthemind1
      @Enterthemind1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The DOD are the main ones creating antigravity ships.(* cough the TR3B couch *) That's where all the "black money" is going to.

    • @jayyyzeee6409
      @jayyyzeee6409 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DoD has killed more promising technology than Google.

    • @lillyanneserrelio2187
      @lillyanneserrelio2187 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jayyyzeee6409 That's not really fair. Microsoft squashed MANY promising tech companies in their day. Even more than IBM + Apple combined.

  • @Jeffrey050711
    @Jeffrey050711 4 ปีที่แล้ว +295

    It sounds like any time we hear about scientists getting close to discovering a method of simulating anti-gravity both the project and scientist go dark and are never heard about again. Gee, I can only imagine why this is.

    • @Saugaverse
      @Saugaverse 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      Odds are their projects failed and that was that.
      Like an old girlfriend, you never see them again.

    • @HPPalmtopTube
      @HPPalmtopTube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      @@Saugaverse True, every year thousands of people "get close" to discovering a free energy device, only for the project and creator to go dark for the same reason. It failed! ;)

    • @Bobsry16
      @Bobsry16 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@HPPalmtopTube No such thing as free energy, but yes a few drastically novel energy sources/harvesters are researched in secret I believe. We live in an amazing world, the truth is out there.

    • @xYottabyte
      @xYottabyte 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Like bionic arms but actually getting closer, also aerospike engine, succeded but never used since it isnt efficient because of the weight...
      Also random, do yoi think quantum computers will really get close?

    • @sparkybob1023
      @sparkybob1023 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Jeffrey050711 alien abduction

  • @rusmir12345
    @rusmir12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Gotta give it to you, you have a great narrative voice

    • @rusmir12345
      @rusmir12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeap, the voice alone made me subscribe

  • @sigvardbjorkman
    @sigvardbjorkman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Speaking of sci fi travel. I wonder what a warp would look like? Would this space ship just disappear in thin air as it enters the fourth dimension? Or would it disappear in some direction? Or a portion of it disappearing before another part does? What would it visually look like if it could be seen at all?

  • @LetsTalkAboutPrepping
    @LetsTalkAboutPrepping 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    *has promising results*
    "nevermind guess it was nothing"
    *goes private, gets Defense money, goes quiet but still operational*
    Sounds like it was something

    • @davemustaine7504
      @davemustaine7504 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no necessarily. the U.S. needs to research based off even the remote possibility of there being 'something' to ensure its national defence.

    • @Krystalmyth
      @Krystalmyth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davemustaine7504 national defense from whom

    • @jimmyjam2540
      @jimmyjam2540 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Krystalmyth the offense.........

    • @bobbell2122
      @bobbell2122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Funding by the US Govt is proof that this does not and will not work.

  • @gianluca.g
    @gianluca.g 4 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Science: antigravity could open the gate to space exploration
    Boeing: Let's steer enemy missiles

    • @isorokudono
      @isorokudono 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There is no gravity in space. There is tons of electricity and electromagnetism, however.

    • @jm08a31
      @jm08a31 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Roland Deschain That is actually false, as there are gravimetric forces in space. There is gravimetric forces everywhere, no matter how small, due to how gravity is defined in both newtonian physics and physics surrounding gravity by Einstein.

    • @Krystalmyth
      @Krystalmyth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@isorokudono wtf are you talking about? What do you think moves the planets?

    • @wasir3703
      @wasir3703 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Roland Deschain
      Wait. What?
      What is holding the entire universe in place?
      How are we still alive?

    • @portwolf2293
      @portwolf2293 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@isorokudono yep, I can see the earth sailing into open space now 🌎😂😉👍
      Don't forget the earth is flat as well 🤣👏

  • @77matius
    @77matius 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dear Mr. Shillito, You sir are very good at researching, writing and presenting. Thanks for the fun material.

  • @CF542
    @CF542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    They never had a problem with this on Star Trek.

  • @DennisJ42
    @DennisJ42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +399

    Department of Defense: "Oh.. Whatcha got there."
    Inventor: "I just invented this anti-gravity device."
    ....
    **Inventor goes missing and stops posting publically**
    Media (on command from DoD): "Too bad we can't verify these results."
    Edit: haha, thanks for the likes and comments guys!

    • @shaundavidssd
      @shaundavidssd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      You don't have to be Einstein to figure that one out!

    • @alphega1983
      @alphega1983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Typically when a scientist's research disappears from public journals and universities is either one, they gave up and there experiments are failures. Two, there funding gets cut and the research projects are cancelled. And finally, if they are successful and they get Dod approval, there research will go dark and become classified depending upon the invention and whether or not the military wants to reveal certain military technological advancements to the public. They usually reveal "new military technologies" at a time when they have developed a classified technology that makes the older one obsolete. When the media reports a story about DARPA developing some new technology, it's probably already 20 years old or more.

    • @rutessian
      @rutessian 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@alphega1983 “There” means in that place: We drove there early in the morning. “Their” is a possessive form of they: They gave their earnings to charity. “They're” is a contraction of they+are: When Grandma and Grandpa get here, they're going to take us out to lunch.

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@alphega1983 Another angle on that though is that it is much easier to convince DARPA grant reviewers of things than domain experts like other scientists, so a lot of shady operators, when their research looks like it is about to collapse publicly, stop publishing and convincing the DoD to fund them. As long as you give them convincing powerpoint presentations every year or so and have a good personal relationship with someone in the department, you can fund a small lab for a LONG time and not produce any results.
      People put WAY too much faith in the professionalism and planning of DARPA. It is mostly rotating fiefdoms, vague calls for research, and blocks of money given out to what sounds interesting to people unqualified to evaluate feasibility but who really like meetings and paperwork.

    • @ripno2672
      @ripno2672 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alphega1983 Or they get put into a bag that gets put into he ground, but hey, we never know.

  • @MasonVeil
    @MasonVeil 4 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    1:Discovers possible anti-gravity options.
    2: Puts 'new' research out saying there is no anti-gravity.
    3: Opens her own company and calls it *AC Gravity LLC*
    Nothing suspicious here at all.

    • @Rafayel06
      @Rafayel06 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      And then disappeared forever!

    • @justingould2020
      @justingould2020 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Rafayel06 With $400k

    • @jamegumb7298
      @jamegumb7298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      And then NASA starts: stops it all. Then Boeing starts looking into it: shut down. Black project? No comment.
      Not suspicious at all.

    • @JohnVieiraact
      @JohnVieiraact 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      exactly, I know someone that disagrees with this baloney sandwish..Antigravity has been explored already...Einstein was wrong in many issues inc Spooky action at a distance, which is called Entanglement...too much baloney sandwich in physics taught in school..Antigravity in itself is one of many terms explored already..How about air cavity resonance instead? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov

    • @FectacularSpail
      @FectacularSpail 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Sounds like somebody got a job at Area 51.... (or wherever the really cool stuff actually is, if Area 51 is just the decoy site)

  • @rexpayne7836
    @rexpayne7836 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content and presentation. 😊

  • @PerpetualMan22
    @PerpetualMan22 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I believe there could be a way of countering the force of gravity using high velocity charged particles. In some places in the confinement the charge particles would travel near light speeds and at other points far less velocity. Because the higher velocity particles have more inertia than the particles traveling slower.

    • @crow2989
      @crow2989 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wouldn’t that just be a different form of propulsion?

  • @johnberry5275
    @johnberry5275 3 ปีที่แล้ว +229

    [Gravity]: What goes Up, must come Down . . .
    [US National Debt]: *hold my beer* . . .

    • @goldengun9970
      @goldengun9970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That cant go up forever either. Leads to a large collapse

    • @lordinquisitorjohn1357
      @lordinquisitorjohn1357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@goldengun9970 Bet

    • @goldengun9970
      @goldengun9970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@lordinquisitorjohn1357 yes john. You can just create $ forever as much as you like. Even though every other time in human history it has failed this time it won't. Of course

    • @lordinquisitorjohn1357
      @lordinquisitorjohn1357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@goldengun9970 *sigh* It's just a joke man.

    • @goldengun9970
      @goldengun9970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lordinquisitorjohn1357 i wish it was

  • @dr.a006
    @dr.a006 4 ปีที่แล้ว +364

    Paul’s shirt actually has anti-gravity capability.

    • @staffanpercy4357
      @staffanpercy4357 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Anty gravity is probably
      the only way to create the
      force needed to reach, a
      unbelievable speed. Never
      possible for many reasons.
      There's a giant pile of questions that need answers
      But clarity it's hiding within.

    • @alliedvera4960
      @alliedvera4960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Cause it's repulsive?

    • @kurtreber9813
      @kurtreber9813 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@alliedvera4960 exactly.

    • @johnserrano9689
      @johnserrano9689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He legally has to wear the shirt due to legal reason. He is a noted illegal drag racer but he has no car yet races drag cars. Crazy I know but he runs at a top speed of 126mph with unrivaled acceleration if he did not have that shirt drivers wouldnt know it was really him and they would therefore jack him in the neck with a 2by4.
      Good day all

    • @raragam
      @raragam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I LOVE his shirt....maybe its a time-warp-portal-device

  • @robberbarron8161
    @robberbarron8161 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a theory about combining gravitons that’s how black holes work could be why neutrinos come from sag A in vast quantities but she could have been a great motivator they always go to someone else. Could have been a valuable asset to communication in neutrinos or anti grav acceleration later down the road but you had to waste the opportunity to let someone else enjoy her

  • @michaeldavison9808
    @michaeldavison9808 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting. And so refreshing to watch a video that wasn't claiming some bogus perpetual motion machine.

  • @illusions77
    @illusions77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +282

    Back in the 80’s everything was more “heavy”

    • @justsaying3594
      @justsaying3594 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Except the youth

    • @SuperVstech
      @SuperVstech 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      illusions77 why is that? Is there something wrong with the earths gravitational pull?

    • @voidremoved
      @voidremoved 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Except for the hair.

    • @illusions77
      @illusions77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Back in the 80’s gravity had a different value other than 9.8ms, Thant made things less or more heavy. ESP during exam times :)

    • @albertjackinson
      @albertjackinson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @illusions77 Nice Back to the Future reference/pun!

  • @StephenCole1916
    @StephenCole1916 4 ปีที่แล้ว +165

    "We don't know what gravity is..."
    It's a heavy subject, man... :)

    • @Goultek
      @Goultek 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      pun intended? yeah, must be weighty discussion

    • @nton8057
      @nton8057 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I see what you did there , I give your joke 9.81/10

    • @kevinerose
      @kevinerose 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's deep.

    • @EvanRustMakes
      @EvanRustMakes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Beumadine Sweevy Nice copypasta m8

    • @steveoxendine7123
      @steveoxendine7123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      VERY!!

  • @molybdaen11
    @molybdaen11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If gravity really is just the difference in "graviton pressure" by blocking graviton with mass in one direction, then we would need a way to redirect this graviton with energy which does not carry gravity, before they hit the object we want to influence.
    So we need to block the "up" or generate our own gravitons in the direction of the "down".
    Since we found gravity waves and neutrinos I am confident that it is possible, but only with more base research in field manipulation and energy transformation.

  • @nathaniellestrain9609
    @nathaniellestrain9609 ปีที่แล้ว

    You talk about the magnetic particle accelerating triple pressure system so the negative or the positive voltage fluctuation between the magnetic particle accelerator up on the high-pressure containment wall that we had and it was a glass containment wall with 3 different bio vacuum pressures and a high high pressures at that which window electrostatic finally gets through that wall it has to fight harder to get through so it takes an amplifies the wave creating a solid proton matter stream

  • @MotoHikes
    @MotoHikes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +472

    "[Rockets] are nothing more than a chemical reaction"
    Rocket engineers: "Guess i'll just die"

    • @nathanieltoms7733
      @nathanieltoms7733 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Dark matter is a funding scam!!!

    • @suspiciousobjectiveobserve8083
      @suspiciousobjectiveobserve8083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nathan Toms correct

    • @Mantis_Toboggan_TrashMan
      @Mantis_Toboggan_TrashMan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What about that released videos by the NAVY of UFO's? That looked like anti gravity to me.
      The pilots seemed shocked in the video, at what they were seeing. These people are highly trained to identify other aircraft.

    • @suspiciousobjectiveobserve8083
      @suspiciousobjectiveobserve8083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A complex reaction which involves fluid dynamics, pressure mediation and changes etc etc.

    • @wakeupamerica2824
      @wakeupamerica2824 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nathanieltoms7733 what makes you think that?

  • @scottmclennan6114
    @scottmclennan6114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    To quote James Brown “Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me”. He was onto something.

    • @mattfairfield9103
      @mattfairfield9103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      No. He was “on” something 😂

    • @Christopher-N
      @Christopher-N 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      _"Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me"_ isn't accurate, which was one of the problems with Newtonian gravity. According to Newton, if the sun instantaneously winked out of existence, the Earth would immediately careen out of orbit. Both light an gravity are extremely fast... however, we know through observation and experiment that neither is instantaneous; both travel at 299,792,458 m/s.

    • @wolftmfg
      @wolftmfg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Scott McLennan 🤣 ‘Brother is saying something here!’

    • @scottmclennan6114
      @scottmclennan6114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Christopher Noel so you’re telling me James Brown was possibly on the wrong track with his theories?

    • @MilesB1975
      @MilesB1975 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But Bob Marley expanded on the concept....
      "Every little Action... Deserves a Reaction."

  • @Gary-Seven-and-Isis-in-1968
    @Gary-Seven-and-Isis-in-1968 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a fascinating subject and what is not so surprising is that the work seems to have gone underground.
    It will take the birth of another Einstein type of genius to find an answer to what gravity actually is.
    Imaging the possibilities.

  • @ETHRON1
    @ETHRON1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    To say we know nothing about the universe is an understatement.

  • @Dius765RS
    @Dius765RS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    That story about 'Ning Li' and her research is scektch as hell

    • @davidsi5376
      @davidsi5376 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I remember reading about Ning Li afew years ago. She just disappeared and never heard of again. Crazy story!

    • @_justcarlson
      @_justcarlson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I’ve never heard of her, but I had heard of Podkletnov. I didn’t realize their stories were so similar. Might have been onto something.

    • @lillyanneserrelio2187
      @lillyanneserrelio2187 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wear sketcher sneakers. I hope they don't disappear me too.

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      looks like she pocketed the money. I mean if the government comes around and offers you a lot money for research that in the end will amount to nothing anyway, you'd still want the money lol

    • @lillyanneserrelio2187
      @lillyanneserrelio2187 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@carlosandleon if only girl clothes had pockets. Most are just flaps for show or tiny pockets just large enough to fit a single square wrapped condom. You think we enjoy having to carry around our cute designer purses? You're right, we do! 😜

  • @______6879
    @______6879 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I’m a simple man. I see a new curious droid video, I click on it. In all seriousness, you’ve been an inspiration. I’ve been watching your videos for years at this point. As a scientist, I’ve always loved your content. And as now being part of the space program, your videos have a different weight and relevancy

    • @scottmcrae7410
      @scottmcrae7410 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gravity explained here (this is not a joke): th-cam.com/video/NTpytbccqgs/w-d-xo.html Do you know this stuff in the space program?

    • @somethingelse9228
      @somethingelse9228 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@scottmcrae7410 Lol

  • @jedidrummerjake
    @jedidrummerjake 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of Mr. Droid's
    Very best!

  • @mikedunn7795
    @mikedunn7795 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool episode. BTW,where did you get that shirt? It's cool!

  • @TheExoplanetsChannel
    @TheExoplanetsChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The more I watch Curious Droid, *_the more I like it_*

  • @ollebo
    @ollebo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Betteridge's law of headlies: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no"

    • @oldbatwit5102
      @oldbatwit5102 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yep. On youtube, pretty much always.

    • @Biglulu
      @Biglulu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Idk, I got a "maybe, we don't know yet" from this video.

    • @BKnight_
      @BKnight_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can any headline ending in a question mark be answered with a no?
      Paradoxically, you've broken the 'law'.

    • @DonVigaDeFierro
      @DonVigaDeFierro 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      For science topics, that law should be reformulated to "Possibly until we have information. But not now".

  • @Just-a-bit-Jay
    @Just-a-bit-Jay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for a great video! 👍🏻

  • @danielfouardlibertarianono8017
    @danielfouardlibertarianono8017 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The department of the Navy patented an antigravity device in the 1960s. It was just declassified in 2017 I think.

  • @michaelrockwell9691
    @michaelrockwell9691 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    I tried to listen to the video, but was mesmerized by his shirt.

    • @fabiosunspot1112
      @fabiosunspot1112 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That shirt right?if he wasn't smart we just laugh at him 😁😅

    • @dougyates7218
      @dougyates7218 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He does wear some wild ones, huh:)?

    • @garypeatling7927
      @garypeatling7927 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think its fractal

    • @thedood7533
      @thedood7533 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I want it. Whhere could i get it, i wonder?

    • @TheCreapler
      @TheCreapler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol i didn't even realize his shirt till i read this comment had to go back to see what the u were talking about

  • @douggwyn9656
    @douggwyn9656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    In the summer of 1967, the Rice University Physics Dept. sent a backyard inventor to me at Shell Pipeline Corp. to evaluate his supposed antigravity device. The demo device was made largely of Plexiglas and powered by compressed air. The theory was that acceleration of the air stream would "induce" a static gravitational effect, visible by the motion of small balls. The embarrassing thing was, it seemed to work as advertised! A back-of-the-envelope calculation showed that any genuine effect along those lines should have not have been detectable. We hypothesized several causes for the observed effect. After some work in the machine shop and a couple of tries, we were able to track the effect down to leakage of turbulent flow within the air stream. Nice try, but no cigar.

  • @leekenyon8705
    @leekenyon8705 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Being able to alter space could allow some form of anti-gravity and this is done by removing the matter from space thus countering gravity and now it is only a matter of effecting space by placing object without weight or mass with being able change it weight and other ideals could involve warping , bending , folding or stretching space.

  • @markus9400
    @markus9400 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant explanation. Really cool video.

  • @thereisnosanctuary6184
    @thereisnosanctuary6184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Thank you for getting right to it, no ads.

  • @mikeshandtightgarage4893
    @mikeshandtightgarage4893 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Love the video's, wish they came out more often but keep up the great work ma man

    • @alexcheetah79
      @alexcheetah79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rather quality over quantity.

  • @skyhorseprice6591
    @skyhorseprice6591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As I was watching this, an idea occurred to me. Most of the existing antigravity concepts involve some form of mechanical rotation, or electromagnetism, or both, to create an antigravity effect. But what if.....what if the problem is thinking in terms of ANTIgravity? Could we instead think in terms of creating a gravitational field around the air/space craft itself, but a controllable field, one that could be directed so that it could be offset from the vehicle's center of gravity, thus causing it to literally fall towards equilibrium in any direction the operators wish? The potential here is that anyone inside the craft would not feel any G force whatsoever, no matter what kind of insane maneuvers the craft performs. Essentially, using directed gravitational beaming, the craft and its occupants would exist within their own gravitational bubble. This would also have the effect of slowing down time within the craft, relative to the external universe.
    If this could actually be done, what we'd have would essentially be a form of warp drive. It would require a lot of power to produce a gravitational field strong enough to achieve truly spectacular performance, but it would also be highly efficient. No rockets, no jets, no huge fuel load to burned and hurled out the Craft's rear. The power source would almost certainly have to be nuclear, since that is the best way we know to get massive power from a relatively small amount of fuel that lasts a very long time.
    Right. So how do we produce this self contained gravitational bubble?
    I keep thinking about gravitational lensing, the phenomenon in which the gravitational field around large bodies like stars actually bends light. Einstein's principle of universal covariance says that everything has an effect on everything else, and Newton agrees, "for every action, an equal and opposite reaction."
    So. Gravitation bends light. Can light bend gravitation? Meaning, is it possible to warp spacetime with light?
    Not just any light, this would require extreme LIGHT DENSITY using the very upper limit possible in lasers. The idea is, even the light from the sun, intense as it is, is not coherent nor is it highly concentrated in a small space. It is spread out, so its effect on spacetime (hence gravitation) is very minute. This is rather like the gravitational interaction between a planet and a 170 pound astronaut on a spacewalk gone bad. Earth's gravitational field is pulling at the astronaut, but the astronaut is also pulling at the earth. The huge mass difference means the earth wins, and the astronaut plummets to his doom.
    But. The Earth moves too. Just a TINY bit, maybe no more than the breadth of a quark.
    Photons are massless, though, so how could they warp spacetime to create gravity?
    See, I literally am thinking this through as I write, so I'm none too sure that this idea is going anywhere but down the toilet with all the other waste material. Even so, I keep going back to universal covariance. Everything in the universe affects everything else. Change value A, then value B is also altered. So is value X. And value J. So if we have super high powered laser light, generated by nuclear fusion & packed into a small a space as possible, going around rings which encircle our hypothetical air/space craft, with no gaps whatsoever between the rings which cover the entire craft, would the sheer light intensity at maximum density affect spacetime?
    I think...I THINK🤣 that it might, because spacetime affects light. And, if we take the view that all particles are actually distortions or twists in a fundamental spacetime field, then it surely would.
    So yeah. I just gave myself about 20 years of work to do🤣😹

    • @wardaddy9910
      @wardaddy9910 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude ... magnets !
      The Earth has a magnetic force and what happens when two magnets are pushed together at the negative or positive ends ?
      They repel each other. Is there a machine or way to increase the magnetic force in am object ?
      So in theory a craft could defy gravity and if you could increase turn up the strength of the magnet you could use it to travel in a certain direction !
      Work smarter, not harder.
      Also, you want to verify the information you base your theory on .
      They say that we are on a spinning ball in space which is not accurate.

    • @ADAM-fv3xh
      @ADAM-fv3xh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s actually interesting… please message more if you figure something out that’s interesting.

    • @edwardfletcher7790
      @edwardfletcher7790 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice rant, but you're talking as if we can create a gravitational force, we can't.

    • @edwardfletcher7790
      @edwardfletcher7790 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wardaddy9910 Magnets aren't gravity. The Earth's magnetic field is WEAK.
      Your whole hypothesis is relying on the Dunning Kruger Effect...

    • @skyhorseprice6591
      @skyhorseprice6591 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@edwardfletcher7790
      We currently can't. There was a time when we couldn't create an electromagnetic field or a nuclear reactor either, but that did not stop us from trying until we finally succeeded. There is ongoing research into gravitational propulsion by NASA and the US military. The US Navy, after the Tic Tac event became known worldwide, admitted that UAP's are real physical objects that appear to fly using technology that manipulates gravity and inertia. Science has a history of claiming that things are impossible and then uncovering new data that proves the 'impossible.'
      I think it likely (if we do not allow our 'leaders' to 'lead' us into oblivion) that we will develop gravitational warp drive sometime within the next 50 years.

  • @waterfuel
    @waterfuel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Video on You tube shut down after 2 months. Peltier module on digital
    weigh scales loses weight when powered. John Keely did this type of work
    in his shop approx 1892 Philadelphia . He used themocouples /
    thermopiles wires of gold, silver + platinum. With array of tuning forks
    resonance vibrations applied to mass with wires, and nodes
    multiplications, with harmonic ratios, heavy metal would rise up. He
    also demonstrated triple sirens flywheels/ floating with resonance
    vibrations and ratios. He would speed up rpm with air pressure on side
    cups, then slow 2, for sound frequency's ratio. This was also done with
    French scientist using large sandwich plates of differing metals at
    each end of open dirigible frame, that lifted in air when oscillator
    frequencies applied. It was said that Keely got the earth frequency from
    Tesla. Tesla didn't like Keely , since Keely got more investor's money
    than he did.

  • @davisjugroop3782
    @davisjugroop3782 3 ปีที่แล้ว +608

    My physics teacher told us that mankind already have anti gravity power :
    The more mass a person has, the less attractive they are.

    • @kevinklingner3098
      @kevinklingner3098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      It would seem on the face of it humans have had it in the past if the hindu sacred literature is anything to go by. And it seems that it is. As a concept it should be possible using very high end super conductors and super magnets. It would be necessary to produce power of a high amount in a very small limited space using a mercury ion generator of some kind as the sanskrit literature writes about this concept. Its a matter of harnessing negative and positive effects of magnetism.

    • @destineyrodgers1733
      @destineyrodgers1733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      That’s fucked up and it’s not even funny

    • @destineyrodgers1733
      @destineyrodgers1733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hahah okie dokie

    • @destineyrodgers1733
      @destineyrodgers1733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LEELe hahaha okie dokie

    • @glenncater1
      @glenncater1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@destineyrodgers1733 YOU MUST BE A FATTY !!

  • @scottransom7337
    @scottransom7337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Best video on Gravity and recent events and research I’ve seen!

  • @davidkatuin4527
    @davidkatuin4527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting as well as the comments. Doesn't seem like anyone wants to tackle gravity. Sometimes if we move our frame of reference, clarity will be welcomed. Thanks for the vid.

  • @antoniomaglione4101
    @antoniomaglione4101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You nailed it down, when you says how / why, those trillions of atoms - when clumped together - do produce this "force", which seems to defy human understanding.
    And yet, it is very plausible that there is a link between dark matter and gravity: the mass of baryonic matter - the matter we can see - is totally insufficient to keep the Universe together as it is; there is an hidden amount of energy and matter, about 95% of the total - and 95% is not a typo -. We can see the effects of this invisible energy / mass combo, but we can't see it directly with our eyes or instruments. We first noted this disparity in the early '60, was the astronomer Vera Rubin the first to observe it.
    The most probable explanation of this sad state of the facts - is that there is an "hole" in our scientific theories.
    Thank you for the great video, Mr. Shiilito...
    LATE NOTE: Disney made a funny kid story out of anti-gravity with "Flubber"... The movie is an inspiration into the possible applications of the concept...

  • @Dybicus
    @Dybicus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    If some kind of anti-gravity device or engine were discovered, you can bet on it that we'd be the very last to know - if it all.

    • @wonderming1
      @wonderming1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The government has had it for years. Just because msnbc hasn't told us about it, doesnt mean it doesn't exist.

    • @tinetannies4637
      @tinetannies4637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Uh.....so you think people wouldn't be climbing over themselves to make a fortune on such a discovery? Yea, that's likely....

    • @tinetannies4637
      @tinetannies4637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Agent J Right. Why do I let myself get sucked into these things ha ha ha

    • @Baigle1
      @Baigle1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @1234 Can you tell me what causes the Tajmar effect in rotating near-superconducting metals? Do you think it is a symptom of the Casimir effect, composite bosons interacting with gravitomagnetic fields, complex gyroscopic procession and vibrational error, or interactions with the recently confirmed Higgs?
      When you push a Megajoule per microsecond through superconducting discs, what particle exactly allows some of that energy to travel through blocks of lead, if at all? (You can find a video on this one)
      If we can ignore the UFO-Mania campaigns, and think rationally for ourselves, we could certainly get a lot of individuals studying these materials. We need a lot more yes or no answers than what we have, then we can drill down on why. There are many researchers that have been working on this for over 2 or 3 decades now, some with more or less success and attention to detail. One that seemed to believe what he said on television shows was Eugene Podkletnov, but his dishonesty or irrationality got him expelled from his institution. It appears that he was trying to explain flux pinning or induced diamagnetism in place of gravitational shielding, but the jury of peers is still out, and his 1997 comments are still a mystery.

    • @ronniebaxter7221
      @ronniebaxter7221 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      6Beers&1Waitress The Germans were experimenting with it since the 1930s. The TR-3B is the first known anti gravity vehicle the US has developed. Today we have the Black Manta. Take a look at Bob Lazar on TH-cam. The Black Manta is discussed in detail by industrialsurrealism.com. "What's in our skies."

  • @garyknight8616
    @garyknight8616 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Best video on "antigravity". No BS just the science. Thank you.

  • @waterfuel
    @waterfuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Several years ago, a video was shut down after 1 month. It was dealing with demonstration of thermocouple/thermopile that slightly loses weight when activated, and also on sensitive digital weigh scale. The word "correlation" describes other experimenters who successfully aborted gravity with their specialized set ups using matched metals according to ratios of properties. See 1800's work of John Keely with his "transmitters" as junctions of silver, gold, and platinum thermocouples as tested for gravity control. A french scientist also lifted an open frame dirigible with sandwich plates at either end hooked to frequency transmitter. (translated from french) It seems there are other ways to disrupt gravity waves affecting mass..

  • @energyexecs
    @energyexecs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...It is well known in physics courses that the vector force of angular momentum overcomes or offsets gravity. Thus you see those effects in the gyroscope or rotating wheels.

  • @seb_gibbs
    @seb_gibbs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    10:08 there was some experiments (about a year ago I think) that measured gravity on the atomic scale, and concluded it had the same effect no matter how small. It made headline news here at the time.

  • @RPKGameVids
    @RPKGameVids 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Something about this video just 'pulled me in' when I saw it pop up in my subscriptions box.

    • @MendTheWorld
      @MendTheWorld 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      RPKVids I must admit, it is a very attractive topic.

  • @IceniTotalWar
    @IceniTotalWar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    would love to see an update to this video someday.

  • @particle4005
    @particle4005 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic explanation.

  • @blackdagger7332
    @blackdagger7332 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Yes, amazing. Thank you so much for your review on anti-gravity possibilities, this is what i wanted, not just videos on "simulating gravity with centrifugal force".

  • @bradyjordan7279
    @bradyjordan7279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love your shirt bro! best shirt ive seen in years. Also you make amazing videos and could listen to you all night. Great stuff. Thank you.

  • @PirateRo333
    @PirateRo333 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, nice video. Time for an update!

  • @hellwithit
    @hellwithit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not only is it possible, but it’s a fact that someone has the ability to overcome gravity. And I swear by my behind that is a true statement!!

  • @Mirpurmad
    @Mirpurmad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    beautiful documentary, nicely explained for everyone who has some interest in science

    • @YDDES
      @YDDES 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gumnam Musafir. Still No anti gravity…

  • @lubutobwalya5810
    @lubutobwalya5810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I Love the way he explained everything in a calm and concise way

  • @shermangriffin4668
    @shermangriffin4668 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this guys work.

  • @marat61
    @marat61 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you please post some links for open science articles? Also you did not mention em drive and "inercoids" made by Tolchin

  • @seanmcdonald5859
    @seanmcdonald5859 4 ปีที่แล้ว +470

    "Since 2001 she has effectively dissapeared"
    *Tin foil hats begin to quiver*

    • @TheGenelive
      @TheGenelive 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lol....hhhmmmmm?

    • @brandenjones716
      @brandenjones716 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      I mean, come on, you cant say thats not weird . figures out gravity then disappeared.

    • @TheGenelive
      @TheGenelive 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@brandenjones716 I was saying WHAT !, because I didn't understand shit he was saying....lol, But the disappearance doesn't surprise me. She's maybe working on a new weapon to kill people right now. For the Gov. no less.

    • @dumptrump3788
      @dumptrump3788 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      "Since 2001 she has effectively dissapeared" .... suspicious....or a terminal case of "What the hell was I drinking?"

    • @arnoldshmitt4969
      @arnoldshmitt4969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dumptrump3788 MAYBE BOTH

  • @JasonLastName
    @JasonLastName 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Could we have a complete series on “gravity” ? Your videos are awesome! Lol

  • @BeatusGubler
    @BeatusGubler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Meine These: Nur über den Weg energiereicher Interferrenz-Felder kann die Trägheit der Higgs Bosonen umgangen werden. Mind. zwei Quellen welche oszillieren erzeugen ein drittes Feld welches eine Blase erzeugt. In dieser Blase existieren weder Trägheit noch das, was irrtümlich als Gravitation bezeichnet wird. Gravitation wird erzeugt durch den Druck des Quantenvakuums, welches in der Nähe zu Massen im Quadrat abnimmt. Dafür gibt es Indizien, welche im Experiment widerholbar provoziert werden können. (Casimir Effekte, Hodkinsons Experimente mit 2 Radar Oszillatoren, usw.)

  • @benanddadmechanical6573
    @benanddadmechanical6573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve always wondered if the part of e=Mc^2 that relates mass to energy is some form of vortex that causes the space time contraction that we describe as gravity?

    • @MichaelClark-uw7ex
      @MichaelClark-uw7ex 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gravity is not a force, it is the curving effect that all mass has on space.
      Unless you could controllably curve space in a small area, antigravity is impossible.

    • @Calikid331
      @Calikid331 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MichaelClark-uw7ex Antigravity is definitely possible and does exist. Bob Lazar has given very detailed recollections of his time at area 51, he said these UFO crafts at area 51 were powered by element 115 long before element 115 was discovered, he mentioned how these crafts generate gravitational waves decades before gravitational waves were discovered, he even gave a detailed explanation of how some of these UFO's maneuver, and in declassified UFO footage these UFO's move exactly as Bob described. Moving in ways that would only be possible with antigravity propulsion.
      Unfortunately from what he said, we are too technologically behind to effectively reverse engineer the technology on these alien crafts. This is a craft that had no electronic components, no wiring, no moving parts, no on or off switch, generated no heat, but had the ability to distort gravity around it.

  • @skatee99
    @skatee99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Once again, a very interesting and factual video. Keep up the good work!

  • @Auto-Toon
    @Auto-Toon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Earth: pulls u in
    *pulls out reverse card*

    • @corndoghead1
      @corndoghead1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You:pull earth in

    • @joseinfante5054
      @joseinfante5054 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothing pulls you, the earth does not pull, gravity does not exist, it is the subatomic particle AETHER that pushes you towards the magnetism of the earth. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  • @arturovasquez9720
    @arturovasquez9720 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Una de las mejores exposiciones sobre el tema.

  • @rustybucket1992
    @rustybucket1992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not just antigravity but a force that repels gravity. Like trying to put two magnets together. They push away from one another.

    • @Mike-yp4ez
      @Mike-yp4ez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Negative gravity is attracted to both positive gravity and negative gravity. Positive gravity is repelled by negative gravity...

  • @brianarbenz7206
    @brianarbenz7206 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    at 0:15 the question is, "Could an apple that falls onto a table and splits into 4 equally sized pieces with surfaces sliced perfectly flat Really Be Possible?"

  • @ronaldmartino2610
    @ronaldmartino2610 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've watched several of your video's. This one motivated me to subscribe. Write a book, I'll buy it. If you are not a PHD or a professor, you should be. You have my attention. Thank you for the enlightenment.

  • @paulrosa1701
    @paulrosa1701 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Of course. Just like electromagnet fields can be positive and negative we just need to figure out how to make a negative gravitation field.

  • @kherei72
    @kherei72 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb video, thank you.

  • @devnebula
    @devnebula 4 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    To make an anti-gravity technology, we truly need to know what gravity is. We have known its effect. Much more to explore.

    • @vikrantbagde612
      @vikrantbagde612 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You mean worlds scientist dont know what gravity is

    • @brandonwiebe2647
      @brandonwiebe2647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Vikrant bagde exactly. We can measure it and derive important equations from it but nobody really knows what gravity is.

    • @harvia8348
      @harvia8348 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @The Swoop oh shit i better guickly steal that so ican finally return to neptunia

    • @harvia8348
      @harvia8348 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thisistheway96 only super fast spinning black holes are omnidirectional since the singularity cant compress to a single point. Or thats the likely theory. Olso black planets?

    • @harvia8348
      @harvia8348 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure boblazars sayings saund like they are true but most of the documentaries bend the truth guite a bit. And there still are meny inconsistensies.
      (Sorry for bad english)

  • @j.wicker6170
    @j.wicker6170 4 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    "A steerable artificial gravity source"? Why not just say "tractor beam"?

    • @gctdonyre
      @gctdonyre 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      God damnit, Scott, I'm a doctor, not an engineer!

    • @deanazcoolzi4382
      @deanazcoolzi4382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Beam me up

    • @j.wicker6170
      @j.wicker6170 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @Braxton Conley What you described is called a "teleporter" (molecular disassembly in one spot and reassemble in another). Different from using gravity to lift, move, or stop objects.

    • @bobinthewest8559
      @bobinthewest8559 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Braxton Conley...
      "Teleporter", and "tractor beam", have both been depicted in science fiction... but are two distinctly different things.

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Doesn't Disney own that name now? Maybe there's your answer.

  • @Carlos15Romero21
    @Carlos15Romero21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the intro.

  • @futuramayeah
    @futuramayeah 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i heard somewhere that each planet has it's own gravitational frequency , and if you know the number, i don't know what to do with it, but that would be a first step i think

  • @robj7481
    @robj7481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    Anti-gravity?? Actually, I’m PRO-gravity. Helps keep me from floating away.

    • @ntactime_w3488
      @ntactime_w3488 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ok boomer (;

    • @lucofparis4819
      @lucofparis4819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@syaondri Use a balloon. Duh.

    • @fryncyaryorvjink2140
      @fryncyaryorvjink2140 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gravity kills!!!

    • @robj7481
      @robj7481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      syaondri, if you plan on floating away, make sure you have oxygen handy for your trip

    • @robj7481
      @robj7481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nabre Labre, that depends.. gravity on Earth saves lives. Gravity in a black hole ends lives.

  • @sparkynm156
    @sparkynm156 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    As a Military Brat, one thing I witnessed was Military Personnel, Terrified , yelling to Run the Restraints are goin .. lots of quick comments.. then this thing broke loose and just shot straight into the night sky like a magnet repelling it's opposite polarity ...
    It did not come back down from what I saw and it shot up faster than almost anything I've ever seen..
    I was across a field 4x4ing through the woods in a black area...
    There is alot of crazy things going on at Bases...

    • @abhinavdharmani3362
      @abhinavdharmani3362 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why should we trust u

    • @tanyahall5072
      @tanyahall5072 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vodka that's why

    • @wrnchhead76
      @wrnchhead76 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @USA#1 !! You haven't met any of the military brats I have known. They are nothing like this fantasy you have concocted.

    • @abhinavdharmani3362
      @abhinavdharmani3362 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tanyahall5072 exactly

    • @sparkynm156
      @sparkynm156 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @USA#1 !! Yes, and the Preachers Daughter is a Virgin... The Police Chiefs Son isn't a Thief, and the World is Flat..
      Take it as you want or don't. I've witnessed some amazing things. I grew up as a Military Brat where NASA, USAF, Private AeroSpace , etc all come together.. That meant Many Good Family Friends and Incredible Mentors over the years.. If you think what I witnessed is so impossible then You couldn't possibly Believe in or Comprehend where Man is Technologically.
      In the 40s you would have said Space Flight is Crazy talk or Cell Phones.. well thats just Down Right Maaad.. I Tell Ya...
      You wouldn't believe there are craft that in a bad day , can suck electricity right out of the power grid to gimp home, causing rolling blackouts. Or Craft that look invisible, direct energy weapons that are used pretty frequently and much more.. So you Mock all You want.. Personally, I would have not acted like a prick and maybe asked a question or two or left it alone. But when They prove the World is Round and we are Flying through the Air in Giant Air Planes , everyone is carrying around a phone and computer in their pocket, and we are Launching People into Space... You'll have to Look at Yourself in the Mirror and think about all the people You Crucified and all the witches You Burned.. Then again.. judging from your demeanor, you will probably say.. Yup.. I knew about it all along...
      Lighten Up. Or why would anyone share information or experiences with You.. Who knows.. You could have asked where and when and do I think that research is still going on in these places.. Its5one thing to see something shoot across the sky while your driving , it's a whole other beast to goto a place where you can see something coming and going or an accident once in awhile that shakes you to your very core..
      Treat others as You want them to treat you or just go on about your day.
      P.s. The World isn't Flat...

  • @philosophyforum4668
    @philosophyforum4668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whoever makes an anti-grav craft would be super rich. Imagine floating down into the parking lot for another day at work. Everybody would be checking you out asking, whoa, how much did that thing cost?

  • @semorgh2854
    @semorgh2854 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the Best videos I have ever seen. From 4:11 to 4:41 is an excellent explanation of creating Anti-Gravity but such Ions/Plasma have to be WITHIN a LIQUID which is normally WATER.
    Spinning superconductors for experimental purposes is good to prove the concept but to make a real ANTI-GRAVITY you must have LIQUID PLASMA (GANS).
    One thing people do not understand which is : the property of ANTI_GRAVITY is simply Magnetic field. simple reason is that Magnetic field is 10^34 times stronger that Gravity

  • @anom794939393
    @anom794939393 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    this dude has amazing content, his research is so good, everything he has said in this video makes me feel so much like their are some conspiracy's going on

    • @user-nj9pr3ib2p
      @user-nj9pr3ib2p 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Anon (So I'll call you, 🤔Hmm... Greg) is that your Phone Number after the 4 characters of text? If so why and perhaps you may wish to change it.

  • @Gauravkhulbe-hy2hl
    @Gauravkhulbe-hy2hl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +259

    Gravity has somthing to do with vodka.. After 2 shots i feel like gravity is increased by 2 times

    • @SwissTrippin
      @SwissTrippin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Just 2 shots? Get your liver tested buddy

    • @SwissTrippin
      @SwissTrippin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @David Daivdson oh in that case register for a transplant 1st and then get it tested

    • @photogeen
      @photogeen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      weakness disgusts me

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      after 3 shots gravity disappears alltogether

    • @Capta1nFaz
      @Capta1nFaz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should try taking two shots from the law, the gravity of the force is over powered

  • @fletchergull4825
    @fletchergull4825 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am so confused by the discord on this topic. Brian Greene said that repulsive gravity IS included in general relativity, like when a region of space experiences uniform negative pressure, a cosmological constant/dark energy, inflation etc?

  • @jbirdmax
    @jbirdmax 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The day we learn the secrets of gravity is the day we learn the true gravity of our reality’s secrets.