Options on Futures Building a More Complete Portfolio | Tom Sosnoff

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @CanadianOptionsTrader
    @CanadianOptionsTrader 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Another amazing talk by Tom Sosnoff! This is by far the best talk I've ever seen Tom give!

  • @surfcruzer
    @surfcruzer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pure gold, way ahead of his time.

  • @dannytetreault
    @dannytetreault 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank-you, Tom!

  • @gregkeen4907
    @gregkeen4907 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This has been the biggest eye opener I've encountered since I started trading years ago. Thank you so much for posting this!

  • @gavnonadoroge3092
    @gavnonadoroge3092 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @pamericafields1903
    @pamericafields1903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *The ASH strategy is a win win method for traders* 💪😎

  • @esta1177
    @esta1177 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Tom, is this strategy still working? and is there a way to bake in a black swan strategy into it?

  • @jasonpermanna308
    @jasonpermanna308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dindnt know option for future is capital efficiency

  • @markbaugh6083
    @markbaugh6083 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Trade small trade often” ? LOL... you bet, Tom makes money on all Tasty Trade commissions!

    • @1_nS1d3
      @1_nS1d3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you really think he needs that money? He sold TOS...

  • @headlibrarian1996
    @headlibrarian1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What’s the actual notional risk of these trades? The /6E slide implies you’re taking $32,000 of risk for your $1,200 in BPR. 7 such trades means you’re taking about $200k of risk in your $25k account. That’s scary.

    • @volkerblume238
      @volkerblume238 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this true? You have the option on a future. You’ll get the future in case of assignment which you can still sell on a liquid market. That is my understanding.

    • @KC-nb3mm
      @KC-nb3mm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It doesn’t matter what your notional is

    • @headlibrarian1996
      @headlibrarian1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KC-nb3mm It does when evaluating risk. A mere 10% loss I totally wipes you out at this level of leverage.

    • @KC-nb3mm
      @KC-nb3mm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@headlibrarian1996 10% loss on 200k of notional? If you sell to open an Iron condor on SPX and your max loss is $1500, why does it matter what your notional is? The same logic applies for ES

    • @TooDaft
      @TooDaft 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@headlibrarian1996 10% loss on these commodities and etfs would be scary for everyone. Highly doubt you'd see that unless you get covid 2.0.
      Point is manage your risk even if the potential loss is unlimited, follow the strategy and cut when you need to cut.

  • @123-f6j8h
    @123-f6j8h 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shill for Tastyworks

    • @headlibrarian1996
      @headlibrarian1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The owner of TastyWorks is by definition not a shill.

    • @123-f6j8h
      @123-f6j8h 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@headlibrarian1996 Let's not get too technical about this! He encourages people to trade with misleading studies for a few years, and then opens a brokerage firm to take advantage of all the people he's fooled! He's an absolute disgrace!

    • @rongrace6324
      @rongrace6324 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@123-f6j8h yea he only makes a few million a year trading ! nothing disgraceful about that.

    • @J123G
      @J123G ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He is on a mission to help people trade their accounts with more diversification and be less exposed to wild market swings. He is already crazy wealthy (since selling Think or Swim to TD Ameritrade for $700m). He is a brilliant person who can’t sit still and enjoys his work, he isn’t on a mission to scam people into churning their accounts at Tastyworks brokerage.

    • @jiti5034
      @jiti5034 ปีที่แล้ว

      half cooked and half finished stuides