Good content mate. I'd recommend you check out Tom Campbells work and his theory of everything/consciousness exploration. You should try to set up an interview with him. He doesn't discriminate when it comes to creators with low sub counts.
It’s not that it’s made of nothing, it’s a force field, not an object. This is where you get quantum field theory. In Kashmir shaivism this would be called shakti, the sacred tremor. Shakti emerges from consciousness through primordial self awareness. Self awareness creates the magnetism of repulsion and attraction. These forces then play out and project creation. Shakti uses this consciousness( that is it made of and also consciousness is karmically free from) to continuously evolve itself, which is the creative process of this universe, so that consicousness eventually goes back into itself. This immersion is samadhi. This primordial recognition of its existence is what enlightenment is. The loop is fulfilled and so it goes on eternally.
Good comment! Only last night I was listening to Swami Sarvapriyananda talking about Kashmiri Shaivanism and Advaita Vedanta. My explorations had not previously expanded into Kashmiri Shaivanism but last night's video and your comment mentioning the same thing seem to prompt further earnest enquiry.
This is so interesting. When we burn ourselves when cooking, it hurts really bad. I was always told to use cold water. It takes the pain away, but as soon as you take the finger out of the water, it burns again. Worse than before. On my spiritual journey, I learned quite a few things. When I burn myself now. I say to myself, "I didn't burn myself." I repeat it a few times. Suddenly, there is no pain, no redness, and no blister. Within seconds, literally. ❤❤
I love that train of thought that disappears something I thought was real in a materialist sense of the thing. Thank you for this guide on how to disappear the material world!
That is so wonderful, thanks 🙏🏻. When I got up today I heard lesson 3 from the "course in miracles" (everything you see only has the meaning you gave it). Then I saw a reel on instagram from the movie Matrix where a young monk gives exactly this explanation using a spoon. And now your video. I have the impression that the universe is trying to answer my questions with a sledgehammer. 😂❤
I love the logical way in which you explain the unexplainable. Hsving said that, I'm listening to this several times so me monkey mind gets it. Thank you.
Insta-subd. I'm so glad your channel showed up in my perceptive experience. You're onto something amazing here, navigating the waves of what we believe to be reality. Thank you for sharing.
Birds can't taste chilli - this allows them to eat chilis and spread the seed. Chilli powder keeps the squirrels off bird seed/food. I was thinking of this yesterday making chilli sauce. The heat in't IN the chilli - it is IN the perceiver of. This is how this is landing. OMG makes so much sense.
I think this was the first time I understood the significance of the double blind slit study with photon gun: waves unobserved and dots observed. Great video and no script...amazing.🙏 Regards, Victor
Yes that’s exactly it. This would be an experiential understanding of exactly that and how it applies to experience 🙏 appreciate the comment brother. See you Friday!
Apparently so, if we are to believe this. I decided to test this out by holding my finger in the flame for 15 minutes. As my finger caught fire I reassured myself that it's just a perception after all😂
So I hold a thermometer in the visible flame and it registers the temperature of it. Is the thermometer not capable of deceiving itself in the face of the obvious as you suggest we should? Also, 'hotness' is usually referred to as 'heat.'
I'm not scientific but not entirely sure of this logic. It seems to me temperature is a way to measure a property of an object, a way for us to describe a property of an object. The property itself may be the hotness or the coldness of an object. But the hotness or the coldness, again, is an abstraction of that property. So, the property may be the movement of those particles that make up the matter (atoms, molecules, whichever the level you'd like to describe it). Or other words/concepts, vibration, motion of particles that fuelled by kinetic energy ...etc. Sensation is how we perceive of that property. So in your frame of logic, perhaps an argument can be made, that the property (meaning the motion or vibration of particles) which leads to the sensation of temperature do exist. To someone who lose sensation, he can't experience the temperature. But if the matter does exist, the vibration and the motion of the particles who make up the matter do exist, independent of our experience. So the temperature might be a sensation, but that is not the point to prove the matter, or the object do not exist. Whether the matter exists or not, that might be a different debate. Anyway, just to share some random thoughts that raise doubts. But thank you for openning up the investigation.
Thanks for sharing this analysis Nina. The thing is, when you share these scientific ideas, they are already betraying the purpose of the experiment. the prerequisite is that we base our investigation only on our direct experience. We have to assume science does not know (because they don't) and take the truth into our own hands to tell us anything true about our experience. So the basis of your doubt is too far in the wring direction. It already assumes there is an outside world and it assumes that there is something called matter in order to analyse it. We must go even further back than that and make even less assumptions. In fact I would say to make absolutely 0 assumptions whatsoever. We can not know anything about the world unless we know the tool we use to explore it. Would you agree? We would not for example use a faulty microscope or use a microscope where we had no ides what it was. So before we explore the world, we must know the nature of the mind & consciousness we have that is exploring the world otherwise the mind we use to experience the world could be affecting the nature of the experiment. Which is why, when we start there, we see any science presented on the nature of the world hasn't just been completely wrong, but it is impossible to draw any real facts or information from it because they are starting with one big problem. They start with the assumption that their mind has no correlation to the outcome or nature of the experiment.
I usually understand your videos. But this video I will need to repeat. I have tried to comprehend quantum mechanics but it seems to be beyond my mental capabilities. I just can not comprehend the unreality of seemingly physical objects and is it really necessary that I do? I would like to understand. I have even asked actual physicists that I know but there explanation gets jumbled up in my mind.
If you’re really interested I can help you better in the community where I can clarify in real time and understand what specifically is confusing you 🙏
@@sajafendel. I listened to this again. The sun, galaxies and the universe is a thought from the universal consciousness and as a so called human we are just experiencing this one tiny idea or part of a thought from the universal consciousness.
What ever color we perceive in anything represents the absorption of all light except the color of the observable spectrum which is reflected and perceived as reality ?
So the mechanics of how light is perceived is not so important, the important thing is that colour is not a quality inherent in any object at all. Merely an interpretation of the mind. Like seeing the sky blue. The sky is never blue. So when we see the object has no colour it can not contain colour therefore it has no size shape or form when you dig deeper as done in the video 🙏
I've been wondering about weight. In the void every thing is weightless, yes? So weight is relative to forces like gravity? So we could fly if we could nullify gravity (which some have suggested could be done with sound as with the pyramids)
Yes weight is simply a sensation. It has no real existence. Yes you can lift things with sound. Pretty awesome discovery. I believe that’s likely how pyramids were built.
I'm thinking if a blind person who couldn't feel anything, if they were alone and caught on fire from the flame, and noone was ever there to see it, would the flame ever have existed? I guess like if a tree falls in the woods and noone hears it? Or am I going off on a weird tangent? Haha
The flame only appears visual on one plane of perception. The plane of seeing. Other than that the flame has no existence other than a sensation so if no one was seeing the flsme then no, there would be no colour or sight of the flame. But ultimately there isn’t really a flame there to begin with that exists independently of our own perception.
Nice. But what causes a mind that believes it’s locked into a momentum of the conditioning we refer to as “the past” to break free and be able to manifest a more favorable experience?
I don’t know for certain. But if I were to describe what it feels like … the body, or our cells, seem to have a memory of their own. Or maybe it’s better described as a momentum. This momentum is like a conditioning. For instance if we’ve experienced much trauma, shame or guilt from a very young age, the default state of our day to day baseline feeling about life seems to reflect this. There is, in the background, a sense of doom and dread which doesn’t just vanish the moment you realize your own infinite true nature. For me this could be like I’m driving in my car … feeling great … it’s a beautiful sunny day. Suddenly I run over a huge pothole that I didn’t see in the road and it deeply startles me. This shot to my nervous system sets in motion the circuitry of my fight or flight response, and for the rest of the day, my nerves are shot and my mood darkens. I have trouble getting back to the light, free state of feeling and being that is my true nature. It’s like I lose touch with who I really am and fall back into the ruts of the old painful conditioning. My mind knows I’m free, but this is not reflected in my current feeling state.
Remember, it also depends on what baby we’re talking about. Babies are like little developing portals most of the time. They cry because they feel sensations all the time, such as hunger, cold, etc.
So if you walk away from the imaginary flame and it burns your house down with no one there to see or feel it, is it real then? All you see is no house. Oh well nothing exists anyway. Maybe you can imagine a new place to live. It doesn’t matter what cartwheels you do to explain this shit show of existence, I hate it and there’s no me either to hate it. Whatever.
Why am I aware of THIS? Because THIS is here. Why is THIS here? Because I am. Form is the formless aspect of consciousness. I am aware that I am aware that I am aware that I am nothing. THIS is the self reflection of THIS. You might be presented with the explanation that THIS is the self reflection of consciousness, but THIS is one and the same. All that form - the formless aspect of I - can present is in truth nothing. Because THIS is not here. An illusion.
Wow wow wow, thank you for this🙏🙏🙏:) not sure if you're into the I Ching but I'm doing I Ching readings on this channel in case you're interested:) I love your videos!
@@sajafendel the I Ching is an ancient Chinese divination system made up of 64 possible hexagrams meant to sort of chart the course of the Tao. I read primarily from the Taoist perspective which means that even without resonating with any particular hexagram, there's almost always something of non-dual value. For the most part I read in a really meditative way. It can almost hit on a subconscious level, like listening to poetry, yet poetry similar to a Zen Koan... I love it. It feels like it has transformed me and continues to from the inside out without me even neccissarily knowing how it's happening. The goal obviously is to work in concert with the Tao, but even hearing it is such a blessing:) The words of the Sages are so rich and of great value:)
For a free course & live meditations by Saja, Click here: www.skool.com/thethoughtdojo
Good content mate. I'd recommend you check out Tom Campbells work and his theory of everything/consciousness exploration. You should try to set up an interview with him. He doesn't discriminate when it comes to creators with low sub counts.
It’s not that it’s made of nothing, it’s a force field, not an object. This is where you get quantum field theory. In Kashmir shaivism this would be called shakti, the sacred tremor. Shakti emerges from consciousness through primordial self awareness. Self awareness creates the magnetism of repulsion and attraction. These forces then play out and project creation. Shakti uses this consciousness( that is it made of and also consciousness is karmically free from) to continuously evolve itself, which is the creative process of this universe, so that consicousness eventually goes back into itself. This immersion is samadhi. This primordial recognition of its existence is what enlightenment is. The loop is fulfilled and so it goes on eternally.
Yep, I agree man.
Great description! Thanks for that. It makes so much sense of my kundalini awakening experience. 🙏🏽
@@Zoeticlicense1976 it was wasn’t it?! 🙏
Good comment! Only last night I was listening to Swami Sarvapriyananda talking about Kashmiri Shaivanism and Advaita Vedanta. My explorations had not previously expanded into Kashmiri Shaivanism but last night's video and your comment mentioning the same thing seem to prompt further earnest enquiry.
This is so interesting.
When we burn ourselves when cooking, it hurts really bad. I was always told to use cold water. It takes the pain away, but as soon as you take the finger out of the water, it burns again. Worse than before.
On my spiritual journey, I learned quite a few things. When I burn myself now. I say to myself, "I didn't burn myself."
I repeat it a few times. Suddenly, there is no pain, no redness, and no blister.
Within seconds, literally. ❤❤
Wow! I need to try this. Thanks for sharing!
Goes to show how truly powerful our thoughts are.
brilliant explanation, thank you so much, I love it!
Glad you did 😊 thanks for the comment 🫶
I love that train of thought that disappears something I thought was real in a materialist sense of the thing.
Thank you for this guide on how to disappear the material world!
Thank you for the comment brother, I’m glad you resonated with this! 🙏
That is so wonderful, thanks 🙏🏻. When I got up today I heard lesson 3 from the "course in miracles" (everything you see only has the meaning you gave it). Then I saw a reel on instagram from the movie Matrix where a young monk gives exactly this explanation using a spoon. And now your video. I have the impression that the universe is trying to answer my questions with a sledgehammer. 😂❤
I love the logical way in which you explain the unexplainable. Hsving said that, I'm listening to this several times so me monkey mind gets it. Thank you.
Always a pleasure Jackie, I’m glad you resonated, thank you for the valuable feedback! 🙏
Insta-subd. I'm so glad your channel showed up in my perceptive experience. You're onto something amazing here, navigating the waves of what we believe to be reality. Thank you for sharing.
I appreciate this a lot my friend, thanks for the valuable comment 🙏🌅
Birds can't taste chilli - this allows them to eat chilis and spread the seed. Chilli powder keeps the squirrels off bird seed/food. I was thinking of this yesterday making chilli sauce. The heat in't IN the chilli - it is IN the perceiver of. This is how this is landing. OMG makes so much sense.
I think this was the first time I understood the significance of the double blind slit study with photon gun: waves unobserved and dots observed. Great video and no script...amazing.🙏 Regards, Victor
Yes that’s exactly it. This would be an experiential understanding of exactly that and how it applies to experience 🙏 appreciate the comment brother. See you Friday!
So, a flame burning paper to ashes is just my perception?
Apparently so, if we are to believe this. I decided to test this out by holding my finger in the flame for 15 minutes. As my finger caught fire I reassured myself that it's just a perception after all😂
So I hold a thermometer in the visible flame and it registers the temperature of it. Is the thermometer not capable of deceiving itself in the face of the obvious as you suggest we should? Also, 'hotness' is usually referred to as 'heat.'
Individualized points of infinite conciousness expressing uniquely.
Love this. Thank you.
Always a pleasure Rob thanks for the comment my friend 🙏
I'm not scientific but not entirely sure of this logic.
It seems to me temperature is a way to measure a property of an object, a way for us to describe a property of an object. The property itself may be the hotness or the coldness of an object. But the hotness or the coldness, again, is an abstraction of that property. So, the property may be the movement of those particles that make up the matter (atoms, molecules, whichever the level you'd like to describe it). Or other words/concepts, vibration, motion of particles that fuelled by kinetic energy ...etc.
Sensation is how we perceive of that property. So in your frame of logic, perhaps an argument can be made, that the property (meaning the motion or vibration of particles) which leads to the sensation of temperature do exist. To someone who lose sensation, he can't experience the temperature. But if the matter does exist, the vibration and the motion of the particles who make up the matter do exist, independent of our experience.
So the temperature might be a sensation, but that is not the point to prove the matter, or the object do not exist.
Whether the matter exists or not, that might be a different debate.
Anyway, just to share some random thoughts that raise doubts.
But thank you for openning up the investigation.
Thanks for sharing this analysis Nina. The thing is, when you share these scientific ideas, they are already betraying the purpose of the experiment. the prerequisite is that we base our investigation only on our direct experience.
We have to assume science does not know (because they don't) and take the truth into our own hands to tell us anything true about our experience.
So the basis of your doubt is too far in the wring direction. It already assumes there is an outside world and it assumes that there is something called matter in order to analyse it.
We must go even further back than that and make even less assumptions. In fact I would say to make absolutely 0 assumptions whatsoever.
We can not know anything about the world unless we know the tool we use to explore it. Would you agree? We would not for example use a faulty microscope or use a microscope where we had no ides what it was.
So before we explore the world, we must know the nature of the mind & consciousness we have that is exploring the world otherwise the mind we use to experience the world could be affecting the nature of the experiment.
Which is why, when we start there, we see any science presented on the nature of the world hasn't just been completely wrong, but it is impossible to draw any real facts or information from it because they are starting with one big problem.
They start with the assumption that their mind has no correlation to the outcome or nature of the experiment.
I usually understand your videos. But this video I will need to repeat. I have tried to comprehend quantum mechanics but it seems to be beyond my mental capabilities. I just can not comprehend the unreality of seemingly physical objects and is it really necessary that I do? I would like to understand. I have even asked actual physicists that I know but there explanation gets jumbled up in my mind.
If you’re really interested I can help you better in the community where I can clarify in real time and understand what specifically is confusing you 🙏
@@sajafendel. I listened to this again. The sun, galaxies and the universe is a thought from the universal consciousness and as a so called human we are just experiencing this one tiny idea or part of a thought from the universal consciousness.
Subbed from New Zealand ❤❤❤❤
Hey my kiwi friend 💚
What ever color we perceive in anything represents the absorption of all light except the color of the observable spectrum which is reflected and perceived as reality ?
So the mechanics of how light is perceived is not so important, the important thing is that colour is not a quality inherent in any object at all. Merely an interpretation of the mind. Like seeing the sky blue. The sky is never blue.
So when we see the object has no colour it can not contain colour therefore it has no size shape or form when you dig deeper as done in the video 🙏
The color Fuscia doesn't exist the brain/mind creates it.
Bravo! That's just perfect! 🔥📌😁🙌💥💫 Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!😉
Glad you liked the video my friend 🙏💚 thank you.
I've been wondering about weight. In the void every thing is weightless, yes? So weight is relative to forces like gravity? So we could fly if we could nullify gravity (which some have suggested could be done with sound as with the pyramids)
Yes weight is simply a sensation. It has no real existence. Yes you can lift things with sound. Pretty awesome discovery. I believe that’s likely how pyramids were built.
I'm thinking if a blind person who couldn't feel anything, if they were alone and caught on fire from the flame, and noone was ever there to see it, would the flame ever have existed? I guess like if a tree falls in the woods and noone hears it? Or am I going off on a weird tangent? Haha
The flame only appears visual on one plane of perception. The plane of seeing. Other than that the flame has no existence other than a sensation so if no one was seeing the flsme then no, there would be no colour or sight of the flame.
But ultimately there isn’t really a flame there to begin with that exists independently of our own perception.
I appreciate you ❤❤❤
I appreciate you! 🫶
Nice. But what causes a mind that believes it’s locked into a momentum of the conditioning we refer to as “the past” to break free and be able to manifest a more favorable experience?
What do you think causes that?
I don’t know for certain. But if I were to describe what it feels like … the body, or our cells, seem to have a memory of their own. Or maybe it’s better described as a momentum. This momentum is like a conditioning. For instance if we’ve experienced much trauma, shame or guilt from a very young age, the default state of our day to day baseline feeling about life seems to reflect this. There is, in the background, a sense of doom and dread which doesn’t just vanish the moment you realize your own infinite true nature. For me this could be like I’m driving in my car … feeling great … it’s a beautiful sunny day. Suddenly I run over a huge pothole that I didn’t see in the road and it deeply startles me. This shot to my nervous system sets in motion the circuitry of my fight or flight response, and for the rest of the day, my nerves are shot and my mood darkens. I have trouble getting back to the light, free state of feeling and being that is my true nature. It’s like I lose touch with who I really am and fall back into the ruts of the old painful conditioning. My mind knows I’m free, but this is not reflected in my current feeling state.
So, if you take a baby, who has no perception yet, and poke it with that pin, the baby cries, how is this the mind?
Remember, it also depends on what baby we’re talking about. Babies are like little developing portals most of the time. They cry because they feel sensations all the time, such as hunger, cold, etc.
So if you walk away from the imaginary flame and it burns your house down with no one there to see or feel it, is it real then? All you see is no house. Oh well nothing exists anyway. Maybe you can imagine a new place to live. It doesn’t matter what cartwheels you do to explain this shit show of existence, I hate it and there’s no me either to hate it. Whatever.
Holy shirt.
Why am I aware of THIS? Because THIS is here. Why is THIS here? Because I am.
Form is the formless aspect of consciousness. I am aware that I am aware that I am aware that I am nothing. THIS is the self reflection of THIS. You might be presented with the explanation that THIS is the self reflection of consciousness, but THIS is one and the same.
All that form - the formless aspect of I - can present is in truth nothing. Because THIS is not here. An illusion.
Wow wow wow, thank you for this🙏🙏🙏:) not sure if you're into the I Ching but I'm doing I Ching readings on this channel in case you're interested:) I love your videos!
My pleasure brother I’m glad you resonated 🙏 that sounds interesting what is it?
@@sajafendel the I Ching is an ancient Chinese divination system made up of 64 possible hexagrams meant to sort of chart the course of the Tao. I read primarily from the Taoist perspective which means that even without resonating with any particular hexagram, there's almost always something of non-dual value. For the most part I read in a really meditative way. It can almost hit on a subconscious level, like listening to poetry, yet poetry similar to a Zen Koan... I love it. It feels like it has transformed me and continues to from the inside out without me even neccissarily knowing how it's happening. The goal obviously is to work in concert with the Tao, but even hearing it is such a blessing:) The words of the Sages are so rich and of great value:)
Your first sentence about facts was indeed not a fact 😂😂
👍
😭❤
Lots of good stuff and also lots of fallacies.