Minor nitpicking: In 4:38 you show the integration function ... but you do not show the integration of the same function (albeit I think you intended to) ... you integrated x^2 + 13/2 on the older Casio and (x^2 + 13)/2 on the newer one ... that is why they display different results. And with that, you also demonstrate an advantage of the newer calculator. With that, the typo would have been obvious directly.
4:34 did you notice how they gave out different answers? It is because you didn't put parentheses around x²+13 therefore the gii interpeted it as x²+13/2 rather than (x²+13)/2. This is why I hate using single line display on a calculator.
Thanks for the comparison! I found a 9750GIII earlier this year and have been experimenting with it. I was seeing plenty of videos online of the 9750GII and was curious about the differences!
With the existance of CG50, I think this discussion is dead. If casio is your thing, I mean. I would count the CG50 in the same category as the 9750s. Or am I missing something on the CG?
@@leeprimeroessler3277 Especially in the US where the FX-9750GIII is sold at a deliberately low price to appeal to would be TI-84 customers. (Outside of the US or North America, the equivalent model is the FX-9860GIII which is sold at nearly the same price as the FX-CG50!)
@@MathClassCalculatorAside from price of CG 50, I am watching this review because I want a calculator that looks like a typical scientific calculator so I can sneak it into my exams. Can you turn off the back ligt on CG50 though? If yes it would be great cause the CG50 looks just like a classwiz
Another nice thing about the updated model is because both the fx-9750GIII and the fx-9860GIII are descended (with minor differences) from the fx-9860GII and not from the fx-9750GII, then add-in software applications are supported on the fx-9750GIII, including third-party applications such as KhiCAS. KhiCAS pretty much turns your fx-9750GIII into the cheapest CAS graphing calculator available in the US!
I think that both calculators have the same amount of memory. Does that mean that on the 3rd generation calculator with more apps in it that there might be less memory available for user programs?
Minor nitpicking: In 4:38 you show the integration function ... but you do not show the integration of the same function (albeit I think you intended to) ... you integrated
x^2 + 13/2 on the older Casio and (x^2 + 13)/2 on the newer one ... that is why they display different results.
And with that, you also demonstrate an advantage of the newer calculator. With that, the typo would have been obvious directly.
Hmmm 🤔 , correct!
Good video, it's nice to have a good comparison between these calculators as I was curious if the 9750 series truly required an update.
4:34 did you notice how they gave out different answers? It is because you didn't put parentheses around x²+13 therefore the gii interpeted it as x²+13/2 rather than (x²+13)/2. This is why I hate using single line display on a calculator.
Nice video. Can you compare the 9750GIII with the 9860GIII?
9860GIII seems like a cut down version of the 9750GIII
Thanks for the comparison! I found a 9750GIII earlier this year and have been experimenting with it. I was seeing plenty of videos online of the 9750GII and was curious about the differences!
Thank you!
Can you make a vid on how to use the Casio Fx-9750gii
With the existance of CG50, I think this discussion is dead. If casio is your thing, I mean. I would count the CG50 in the same category as the 9750s. Or am I missing something on the CG?
I generally agree. In my mind, the only reason to get a 9750GIII over a CG50 would be price.
@@MathClassCalculator Yes, price is of course always a valid point.
@@leeprimeroessler3277 Especially in the US where the FX-9750GIII is sold at a deliberately low price to appeal to would be TI-84 customers. (Outside of the US or North America, the equivalent model is the FX-9860GIII which is sold at nearly the same price as the FX-CG50!)
The Casio fx-CG50 is designed to go head to head with the TI-84CE. The CG50 is the clear winner and about $50 cheaper.
@@MathClassCalculatorAside from price of CG 50, I am watching this review because I want a calculator that looks like a typical scientific calculator so I can sneak it into my exams. Can you turn off the back ligt on CG50 though? If yes it would be great cause the CG50 looks just like a classwiz
Another nice thing about the updated model is because both the fx-9750GIII and the fx-9860GIII are descended (with minor differences) from the fx-9860GII and not from the fx-9750GII, then add-in software applications are supported on the fx-9750GIII, including third-party applications such as KhiCAS. KhiCAS pretty much turns your fx-9750GIII into the cheapest CAS graphing calculator available in the US!
Convinced that g3 is the way to go.
Its not a 9750GIII is a 9860GIII but just renamed.
Great vid!
I think that both calculators have the same amount of memory. Does that mean that on the 3rd generation calculator with more apps in it that there might be less memory available for user programs?
Kisi ko purchase krna he to lelo mujse? Mere pass box pack padha he, half price me lelo excellent he unbox b nahi packed he poora
The Casio fx-9750GII gives the wrong answer to the integral in this video...!!!Sorry, the expression was spelled differently there.