Other sources assert that _infinitive phrases_ are not _prepositional phrases_ . So, "to steal the Queen's diamonds" is not a prepositional phrase. From the information out there, an _infinitive phrase_ can work like a noun, adjective, or adverb; but a _prepositional phrase_ can only work as an adjective or adverb, not as a noun.
Cheers for this, I've been looking for "how to remove depression from mind" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Hanincoln Nanlivia Framework - (search on google ) ? Ive heard some super things about it and my cousin got amazing results with it.
A preposition describes the relationship between 2 things. For example the word "with" would be a preposition, as well as the following: Location: on, under, in Timing: before, after, during. Direction: from, toward, to.
Let me explain, “James is chilling on the beach” James is the subject, chilling is the action verb, and so on the beach is the prepositional phrase. Prepositional phrases come after a preposition like on above under below etc. So that a lil tip
00:40 "With the strength" alone is NOT a prepositional phrase. It's not even a constituent part, because it cannot stand on its own (at least not in this sentence). It's the entire "with the strength of a giant" that is the other prepositional phrase here. The PP "of a giant" nested inside of it, is describing the "strength", and that's why it must be the entire branch that comes together. As a proof, try replacing each of them with something else in the original sentence. If they really were separate, you could replace one without replacing the other. So let's check: "Danielle blew the horn (with the strength) (of a giant)." "Danielle blew the horn (loudly) (of a giant)." [×] Doesn't quite work, does it? :q Now let's try this way: "Danielle blew the horn (with the *strength* (of a *giant*))." "Danielle blew the horn (loudly)." [v] "Danielle blew the horn (with the *hammer*)." [v] "Danielle blew the horn (with the *strength* (that she had in her))." [v] Another proof might be to shuffle the sentence around. When doing that, one cannot destroy constituent parts. So, for example, we can do this: "(With the *strength* (of a *giant*)), Danielle blew the horn." [v] but it wouldn't make much sense to do this: "(With the *strength*), Danielle blew the horn (of a *giant*)." I mean, it is grammatical, but it has a completely different meaning than the original.
Good eye! If we wanted to chop down the sentence we could easily write : Danielle blew the horn with strength. Here, "with strength" is the prepositional phrase. The article "the" is only necessary because it's specific to "a giant". I mean technically he's not wrong, although he could have explained that a little better. Cheers!
@@anthonyv8355 You didn't get it either, did you? +_+ The article "the" is irrelevant to what I pointed out. I meant that this part: "with strength" ALONE is NOT a prepositional phrase, it's only if you take it together with "of a giant", like this: "with the strength of a giant". This entire part is the actual prepositional phrase. The part: "of a giant" cannot be separated from it, because that would break the original grammatical structure of the sentence. I used a bunch of example tests that prove that, by replacing only the first part (that didn't work well), or both (which worked fine).
@@bonbonpony No one is arguing with you about your original point. All I was saying was that IF we wanted to chop down the sentence, then we could just write: "Danielle blew the horn with strength." In this example, "with strength" IS the prepositional phrase. The article in the phrase "with THE strength" is key because it's the variable that changes what's necessary to complete the sentence , and, in this case, the prepositional phrase.
a preposition is a word that shows a relationship a noun or a pronoun common prepositions are from,for,over,next,during,down,between ,after,before,according to / like this =]
From the information I gathered, this is right: prepositional phrases and infinitive phrases cannot be the same. It seems the mistake in the video starts from the idea that infinitive phrases can be also prepositional phrases because they start with "to". The problem is "to" acts as an infinitive marker in the phrase "to steal", not as a preposition. It would be a preposition if it were something like "We look forward to stealing the Queen's diamonds". Or "I'm inclined to steal the Queen's diamonds". Or "I agree to steal the Queen's diamonds".
"To steal the queen's diamonds" is only an infinitive phrase. Prepositional phrases are almost always modifiers. You have to write awkwardly to make them nouns: "In the trash is where that smelly business goes."
this is so cool. But I'm still dumb. 1. In this context, "Danielle blew the horn with the strength of a giant." Is "..the strength of a giant." can be considered to be a Noun Phrase? 2. In this context, I would enjoy exploring the Cathedral of Glass. Is it correct that "the Cathedral of Glass." is a Noun Phrase? I cannot comment in the Khan academy website yet, so I did it here.
THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!!
I understood every thing in this video loved it I will be giving an admission test in a really good school for the second time I really wish that I win it this time
I love the energy in the vid, much better than my actual teacher...
Tubby Custard preach
is this the same guy for math?
lol
LMMSkits no. That’s Sal. This guy is David and he’s a linguist. No math, no science. Just English
@@Andy-km1xp He also participates in History if you didn't know :)
The way he made that Danielle in seconds..... LEGENDARY
that danielle sketch is legendary
imagine having this guy as your actual teacher literally amazing
IKR
or even your brother
bro he's exactly the same person as my teacher i swear 😭
"With great power comes great responsibility."
Irrelevant but ok
This is a good example. Thx
@@youngcashregisterakalilbro3261 bruh its an example -_-
I want this man to be my english teacher. I'm filipino and I didn't listen to my actual teacher. Thanks for the help.
I have a test this Sunday thank you! Wish me luck!
kiri ÙwÚ i have a test this sunday😂
test on sunday? u from Israel
Sh4dy_COOLguy bruv not only israel has schools and etc on sunday
nearly all arabic countries have schools on sunday and holiday on thursday
@@rayes119 bruh
Sh4dy_COOLguy understood?
Other sources assert that _infinitive phrases_ are not _prepositional phrases_ . So, "to steal the Queen's diamonds" is not a prepositional phrase.
From the information out there, an _infinitive phrase_ can work like a noun, adjective, or adverb; but a _prepositional phrase_ can only work as an adjective or adverb, not as a noun.
But isn’t the last word in a prepositional phrase always with a noun pro noun or proper noun
@@diegoalejandrogarciasanche7930 Very relevant observations on the topic.
Cheers for this, I've been looking for "how to remove depression from mind" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Hanincoln Nanlivia Framework - (search on google ) ? Ive heard some super things about it and my cousin got amazing results with it.
Nothing like a good dose of grammar to cure depression..
Oh yeee
the smith joke was actually funny
Yes, I agree.
True
Nah
Those who didnt found it funny need to focus more on grammar
Only grammar pros could get it
@@youngcashregisterakalilbro3261 nfsyah
Khan academy the best ☺️🤘🎓👏
karan yadav definitely!
Yup
Yeah
Yup
the grass is green
A preposition describes the relationship between 2 things. For example the word "with" would be a preposition, as well as the following:
Location: on, under, in
Timing: before, after, during.
Direction: from, toward, to.
😊
Does "into" count?
I love this video it helped me learn and gladly passed my exames thank for posting this video
I'm a fifth grade teacher in Trinidad, CO. I use your videos a lot in class, and my students would like to know what David looks like. Thanks.
This makes literally no sense. I give up
@Common man so... You're writing sat march?
Bro thats making the ytber sad
Let me explain, “James is chilling on the beach” James is the subject, chilling is the action verb, and so on the beach is the prepositional phrase. Prepositional phrases come after a preposition like on above under below etc. So that a lil tip
Actually yeah ;(
Watching before exams
This really helped me understand. Thank you so much, keep up the good work.
KHAN ACADEMY IS AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yas
YOU ARE RALLY A NICE TEACHER
After this class ,,my review:This is amazing and all technic is easy for me..i understand clearly 😊❤ you're great 👍😃
The doodle is more than anything I have drawn in art class so far 😂
😂😂 me too
A 5 minute video taught me more than an 80 minute class.
Same
HE WILL SET US FREE
loved this teacher
Love you, you literally saved my English career
thank you so much!
LOVE YOUR VIDS
thank you david
Ty💗💗💗
I finished this grammar course but still need to review a lot.
1:37 its really great.
WOW... thank you.
That Wooden leg joke made me laugh louder than it's meaning. HAHAHA..
Thank you for making preposition such easy to understand.
Wouldn't a semicolon take care of the problem also:
" I knew a Man with a wooden leg; named smith. "
Man love the vid thank you just helped me TwT
From a homeschool mom. Thank you!
Wow thanks, because people that look this up will totally already know what a preposition is
@@adilabbasi2331 I garentee that if you ask 10 people that have graduated high school more than 3 years ago, 9 of them will have no clue
I love the drawing
your better than my teacher
Yup, knew this vedio was helpful
Wow a fun and educational video❤
Thanks u
I love his accent 🥺🥺
Yup. I used to handle this like nothing.
YES
Infinitive, INFINITE!
1:46
😂😂😂
00:40 "With the strength" alone is NOT a prepositional phrase. It's not even a constituent part, because it cannot stand on its own (at least not in this sentence). It's the entire "with the strength of a giant" that is the other prepositional phrase here. The PP "of a giant" nested inside of it, is describing the "strength", and that's why it must be the entire branch that comes together. As a proof, try replacing each of them with something else in the original sentence. If they really were separate, you could replace one without replacing the other. So let's check:
"Danielle blew the horn (with the strength) (of a giant)."
"Danielle blew the horn (loudly) (of a giant)." [×]
Doesn't quite work, does it? :q
Now let's try this way:
"Danielle blew the horn (with the *strength* (of a *giant*))."
"Danielle blew the horn (loudly)." [v]
"Danielle blew the horn (with the *hammer*)." [v]
"Danielle blew the horn (with the *strength* (that she had in her))." [v]
Another proof might be to shuffle the sentence around. When doing that, one cannot destroy constituent parts. So, for example, we can do this:
"(With the *strength* (of a *giant*)), Danielle blew the horn." [v]
but it wouldn't make much sense to do this:
"(With the *strength*), Danielle blew the horn (of a *giant*)."
I mean, it is grammatical, but it has a completely different meaning than the original.
Good eye! If we wanted to chop down the sentence we could easily write : Danielle blew the horn with strength. Here, "with strength" is the prepositional phrase. The article "the" is only necessary because it's specific to "a giant". I mean technically he's not wrong, although he could have explained that a little better. Cheers!
@@anthonyv8355 You didn't get it either, did you? +_+ The article "the" is irrelevant to what I pointed out. I meant that this part: "with strength" ALONE is NOT a prepositional phrase, it's only if you take it together with "of a giant", like this: "with the strength of a giant". This entire part is the actual prepositional phrase. The part: "of a giant" cannot be separated from it, because that would break the original grammatical structure of the sentence. I used a bunch of example tests that prove that, by replacing only the first part (that didn't work well), or both (which worked fine).
@@bonbonpony No one is arguing with you about your original point. All I was saying was that IF we wanted to chop down the sentence, then we could just write:
"Danielle blew the horn with strength."
In this example, "with strength" IS the prepositional phrase. The article in the phrase "with THE strength" is key because it's the variable that changes what's necessary to complete the sentence , and, in this case, the prepositional phrase.
Don't think ur a boss ur a shoe ok!
This is great
Khan academy might be a school I wonder if it is because these video makes me learned easily
Thanks for the lesson I liked and subscribed
👍👍👍👍👍
Love this!!! Especially the trumpet sound.
you are the best have a test ever other Friday and you help me so much
You are the best. I have a test every other Friday and you help me so much.*
@@samarth.patel21 You're the best. I have a test every other Friday and you help me so much.*
@@moplayz7346 Thank you!
Tommorow is my test help me😣😣😣😣😤😥 thanks to your video I can cover my one part of the portion
I feel more informed now that I know this!!!!!!!✌
I fell in love with your voice! Thanks for the help :D
gay
Diana Contreras me too
@@hopes9614 that's not gay..
Your an awsome drawer
This teaches alot for my lessons its good for you i really like it keep making vids and i have khan
This man is UNREAL!
Good one
Thank you very much! Congratulations, you earned one subscriber! That's me!😇
OMG who cares!
Like bruhhhhhhh
This is pure gold
You helped me very much! I loved that positive energy and humour.
THANK YOU THANKYOU OMG UR ENERGY AND CONFIDENCE IS SICK KEEP IT UP
Cara é pika mesmo, a really good explanation of it 💕 thanks, you helped a Brazilian teacher a lot!
Wow thankyou that you post or upload this video that help many vhildren to
THANKS DAVID.
From an Indian student,Thank you❣️
thank you so much
I loved also this video because its open my internal brain😊😊😊😊
I just adore Khans (not gengas khan u know) way of teaching
A black board and some attractive markers and beautiful writing and drawing
the smith one was good ha !
Thank you, brother🙏🏾
How do you write so fast??😊
He said it starts with a preposition but idk what a preposition is
Dante Ezekiel Serena Same here😂
Dante Ezekiel Serena really
Watch the videos in order, then! ;p
a preposition is a word that shows a relationship a noun or a pronoun common prepositions are from,for,over,next,during,down,between ,after,before,according to / like this =]
Dante Ezekiel Serena a preposition is like about over under if or with to ect
why your english so gud
the doodle is so cute omg, this helped a lot too! thank you
10:09 “use pps” HAHAHAHA I DIED
1:09
Good
very helpful!
same
To steal the queen's diamonds is an infinitive phrase, not a prepositional phrase. Prepositional phrases never act as nouns.
not to be rude, but he does actually state that its an infinite phrase, he knows what it is. But I understand your point.
And also, prep phrases don't use "to" and then a verb
From the information I gathered, this is right: prepositional phrases and infinitive phrases cannot be the same. It seems the mistake in the video starts from the idea that infinitive phrases can be also prepositional phrases because they start with "to". The problem is "to" acts as an infinitive marker in the phrase "to steal", not as a preposition. It would be a preposition if it were something like "We look forward to stealing the Queen's diamonds". Or "I'm inclined to steal the Queen's diamonds". Or "I agree to steal the Queen's diamonds".
toolboxforwriters I just saw this. Yes, this was a mistake, a horrible one.
I agree. He misinforms us by this information that is not true
U are the best teacher ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
"To steal the queen's diamonds" is only an infinitive phrase. Prepositional phrases are almost always modifiers. You have to write awkwardly to make them nouns: "In the trash is where that smelly business goes."
Very helpful video
this is so cool. But I'm still dumb.
1. In this context,
"Danielle blew the horn with the strength of a giant."
Is "..the strength of a giant." can be considered to be a Noun Phrase?
2. In this context,
I would enjoy exploring the Cathedral of Glass.
Is it correct that "the Cathedral of Glass." is a Noun Phrase?
I cannot comment in the Khan academy website yet, so I did it here.
The "to" in "To steal the queen's diamonds" is NOT a preposition, it is part of the infinitive form of the verb...
he explains why its a prepositional phrase try watching the whole video for once
I watched the whole video and I still agree that he's wrong. It's an infinitive phrase.@@stevenli3342
Thanks
As a pisay scholar this is my lesson in eng for g7
Could you please, help of using “ occasionally “ as a preposition?
THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!!
@@salmannadeem2827 I’m too young for this...
This is the fotst time i got this . Lol, im geeling pretty gpod about myself rihht about know.
I get this fairly well by now.
COOOOOL
Nice video, great energy throughout the video.
This is key to Hebrew language in the spoken form a very powerful word device. Indicating purpose , intentional power etc 🏳️🌈👌🏾🧕🏿👍🥰🦹🏾♂️📕📕📕📕📕📕
I understood every thing in this video loved it I will be giving an admission test in a really good school for the second time I really wish that I win it this time
hey im late but how did it go lol
Yea same
The doodle was fast and good
Please add video for explaining different types of clauses
Got. A final tomorrow
Please upload objects of prepositions.
This guy deserves a raise
Thank you man this saves me a referral
i was very confused with prepositional phrase but now its soo easy