Reconciling Subjectivity & Substance: Hegel's Critique of Pure Personhood

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating Lecture! Philosophy of right, Phenomenal of spirit, History and Family, He's back! Divorce should be hard , the Science of mind ought to be relegated and enhanced in Civil Society. Respecting the will of the other unlike in ancient world, he permits more liberty in recognizing both as individuals e.g the Freedom to choose the identity of gender, free human beings to make Choice. A person is a Human being for merely being Human, not because of religion affiliation. Thank you very much.

  • @ElbowsUnique
    @ElbowsUnique ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was a really good lecture that just nosedived at the end.

  • @Israel2.3.2
    @Israel2.3.2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is dense but gold.

  • @jakecarlo9950
    @jakecarlo9950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome! The Hegel run has been terrific. Thanks PO!

  • @Irisceresjuno
    @Irisceresjuno 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Extremely good lecture.

  • @evinnra2779
    @evinnra2779 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Bravo! Who gave this presentation? If only he could have spoken a bit slower. I had to pause and rewind a couple of times because he was touching on very significant points of Hegel's theory of Rights. You see, the best part of having this TH-cam channel is that it is just like when reading a serious text, one can stop and contemplate what is being said.

    • @Philosophy_Overdose
      @Philosophy_Overdose  3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It was given by someone named Jonathan Hand, who unfortunately died shortly afterwards.

    • @evinnra2779
      @evinnra2779 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Philosophy_Overdose Oh, sad to hear that . Thanks for uploading this above, he was good at reading Hegel IMHO.

    • @citycrusher9308
      @citycrusher9308 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Philosophy_Overdose @1:33 - ''the status of women'' - was (and still is) superior to men. any ''rights'' the female sex lacked was tossed aside for the right of life (not made into war fodder or rejected from society for lack of usefulness)

    • @fuad000100
      @fuad000100 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can get the transcript from St. John's College website
      digitalarchives.sjc.edu/items/show/6720

  • @quantumfineartsandfossils2152
    @quantumfineartsandfossils2152 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:40+..... "to be rea-l a part of the modern European spirit, subjectivity has to be embodied" *10:13** pause*

  • @glycolictonic
    @glycolictonic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this. You wouldn't happen still to have on file a talk titled 'Heidegger and Hegel on the synthetic a priori' given Catherine Malabou? (I was watching it the day your old channel was taken down, youtube reloaded and puf! gone. I can't find a transcript either, so perhaps I have the title wrong).

    • @Philosophy_Overdose
      @Philosophy_Overdose  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it may be here: backdoorbroadcasting.net/2013/05/catherine-malabou-hegel-on-synthetic-a-priori-judgments/

    • @jakecarlo9950
      @jakecarlo9950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +1 on that request, and anything that connects Hegel & Heidegger.

  • @dubbelkastrull
    @dubbelkastrull 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    18:02 bookmark

  • @theseventh7865
    @theseventh7865 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simone Weil essays on Human Personality!

  • @Irisceresjuno
    @Irisceresjuno 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer it when people don't write down their talks down beforehand and read them out.

  • @projectmalus
    @projectmalus ปีที่แล้ว

    The dynamic quality of a pack of dogs might be equivalent to a person, so comparing a single dog in the property rights example seems unfair. What property rights anyway, except for that dynamic quality and a certain topological arrangement that is widely shared. The waves of energy moving thru this topology are rectified into objects by the built in limits. Another limit to an essential dynamism, starting from the cross, two opposing sets. One set contracts which causes the other, orthogonal set to expand, and vice versa. The limit here is hard to see, but I think the topological arrangement is being, and the material body I see is moving that has been rectified. So as a person, when I see a green plant the shape is approximated while the spectrum of color is accurate, but that green is not offered by the plant and I don't take it, because that perception is that energy surplus to the plant. Not taking and giving right to ownership, only observing and allowing, with the grace of the surplus in the exchange.
    The dog pack has this topology of the individual, embedded in the topology of the ecosystem sensory dashboard: human individuals are trying to form a pack out of context, for more power to restrict the planet topology or ecosystem thru noise, smell, fencing. The grass family is also doing this in a less obvious way inside the "pack, flock or herd" of the person, and the opposing sets here might be ruminants and grass, humans and non-human primates and trees. Humans consuming grass caused stress which was good for evolving the brain since it supplied surplus food which was mostly digestible, but when as a group became more efficient in producing that, and the drugs needed to overcome the loss of vitality, and the control of government for that fear and mistrust, the human bully needs a scapegoat. Humanity eventually becomes the scapegoat whereupon leaders are hung or their heads chopped off on this cultural dashboard. The ugly right to ownership manifesting on a few levels there.
    Thanks for the video!

  • @saintsword23
    @saintsword23 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hegel looks like the creepiest uncle you could imagine.

  • @findbridge1790
    @findbridge1790 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    does Jonathan hand use his hand a lot? I bet he does