I'm really enjoying his interpretation of the third Liebesträume. I especially like the improvisation in the middle section! It's something you seldom hear in modern interpretations.
@@erikbreathes You are absolutely correct about the German. However, there's some difference of opinion over what to call an individual piece from the set. It depends on whether you think each of the three as a single "Love Dream" or as a more general depiction of (collective) "Love Dreams." Leslie Howard and other authorities appear to favor the plural form, and thus refer to the most famous of the pieces as "Liebesträume No. 3." But most of us agree with Bette Davis (Margo Channing) in "All About Eve" in referring to it simply as "Liebestraum."
These three pieces were originally composed as songs for high voice and piano; Liszt greatly expanded the first two when reworking them for piano solo. Here they are in their original form: 1 Hohe Liebe (Cyrille Dubois, tenor/Tristan Raës, piano): th-cam.com/video/4Vyy-kPw3ok/w-d-xo.html 2. Gestorben war ich (Allan Clayton, tenor/Julius Drake, piano): th-cam.com/video/_DTtU9TxVrc/w-d-xo.html 3. O lieb, o lieb (Diana Damrau, soprano/Helmut Deutsch, piano): th-cam.com/video/n_k2CE1Rmt8/w-d-xo.html
Thank you so much! I hadn’t even heard the 2nd liebestraum at all until I found this video! Obviously the third is the most popular, but the other two are equally as beautiful!
@@__414.88b_ not hard to notice the complexity of harmony there comparing to other two: chromatic chord progressions going down is really melancholic and used very well in this composition
@@__414.88b_ I believe it just boils down to the catchiness of the melody. But generally it is difficult to explain the extreme popularity of certain pieces in comparison to thousands of others.
Welp, my impulses told me learn them all cuz why not and they look doable … man i was in for a hell lotta shiet, got the no2 down tho, now working on no 3 D:
Always wondered why people choose to phrase things over the bar line its really confusing to hear/read. LH parts around 1:06 for example. Surely that could be written in an alternative way (with accents on certain notes to emphasis the '3' feel if thats what they want but not to be written over the bar line?)
Youll find that in many liszt scores very odd beamings are used. The second one also has very strange beaming as the 16th notes dont go across the staves as they normally would
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for uploading all three, and not just the third one.
Don't mention it. :)
Periodt😂
True
Indeed
@@Dylonely_9274you are everywhere
1 - 0:16
2- 6:30
3- 11:17
Fabrizio Pardo Thank you my good sir.
Thanks! 11:17 is just what I was looking for! The greatest Nokia ringtone! Haha!
Simply gorgeous. I love so much these three nocturnes.
HOLY SHIT IS THAT A SHCOHPEN REFERNECE?!?
@@swety2962 no silly guy. These are actually nocturnes
@@swety2962these are lizst nocturnes nothing to do with Chopin. Also Chopin didn't create the nocturne John field did
I'm really enjoying his interpretation of the third Liebesträume. I especially like the improvisation in the middle section! It's something you seldom hear in modern interpretations.
Just discovered this interpretation and wondered if someone else noticed it... i thought i liked barenboims the most...but this is my new favourite
Actually the singular form of Liebesträume is Liebestraum
@@erikbreathes You are absolutely correct about the German. However, there's some difference of opinion over what to call an individual piece from the set. It depends on whether you think each of the three as a single "Love Dream" or as a more general depiction of (collective) "Love Dreams." Leslie Howard and other authorities appear to favor the plural form, and thus refer to the most famous of the pieces as "Liebesträume No. 3." But most of us agree with Bette Davis (Margo Channing) in "All About Eve" in referring to it simply as "Liebestraum."
The extra harmony in No 3 really adds a nice sweet layer to it
These three pieces were originally composed as songs for high voice and piano; Liszt greatly expanded the first two when reworking them for piano solo. Here they are in their original form:
1 Hohe Liebe (Cyrille Dubois, tenor/Tristan Raës, piano): th-cam.com/video/4Vyy-kPw3ok/w-d-xo.html
2. Gestorben war ich (Allan Clayton, tenor/Julius Drake, piano): th-cam.com/video/_DTtU9TxVrc/w-d-xo.html
3. O lieb, o lieb (Diana Damrau, soprano/Helmut Deutsch, piano): th-cam.com/video/n_k2CE1Rmt8/w-d-xo.html
¿ósea que Liszt primero compuso los lieders y después transcribió las voces al piano, dando así estos tres nocturnos?
Thank you so much! I hadn’t even heard the 2nd liebestraum at all until I found this video! Obviously the third is the most popular, but the other two are equally as beautiful!
Jorge Bolet. Perhaps the best interpreter of Liszt (and not only Liszt).
cziffra is pretty good at the more virtuosic pieces
Bennett B Yeah but he was talking about his lyrical pieces
@@CalamityInAction cziffra is wonderful for Liszt in general. But Bolet has a wonderful touch to his Liszt too!
Thank you very much for posting these, without you these would be impossible to see and enjoy unless we were to do them ourselves
I appreciate the feedback, my friend. :)
If someone asked me to choose just one musical piece in order to hear for ever, one piece and nothing more in my entire life, this would be my choice.
All beautiful but it's not hard to see why #3 is the prolific one.
It is actually can u explain to me
@@__414.88b_ I believe it's because of the cadenzas and the fast middle section
@@__414.88b_ not hard to notice the complexity of harmony there comparing to other two: chromatic chord progressions going down is really melancholic and used very well in this composition
@@__414.88b_ I believe it just boils down to the catchiness of the melody. But generally it is difficult to explain the extreme popularity of certain pieces in comparison to thousands of others.
First one way harder@@troy5094
I adore nocturnes and since the Liebesträume are basically those, well... What can I say ❤️
Liebestraume - наичистейшая поэзия красоты
My toxic trait is thinking I can play all of these because they "look" easy
Your toxic trait is posting unoriginal comments
@@thepotatoportal69 so true bestie
All 3 reminds me of fountains, harps, and romance (Thus the title Liebestraumes)
very beautiful music makes my heart smile
God Jorge Bolet was something else when it came to piano
These are very nice. I hear the 5 Klavierstuck 06:31.
4:20 9:01 13:06
Welp, my impulses told me learn them all cuz why not and they look doable … man i was in for a hell lotta shiet, got the no2 down tho, now working on no 3 D:
Not available......?
TH-cam bug
This music hurts....
its the complete opposite my friend
yep it hurts an egoistic mind really well, shows you where you are in this world, calms you down, and helps you start afresh
@@user-wg8nb2uj8y My hands beg to differ
I swear I heard of this somewhere. The video was only uploaded four days ago!
Part of it was kdrama cantible tomorrow jic it stems from that. It stuck like glue first time I heard it and looked it up then n there.
But the piece itself was composed more than 200 years ago.
@@eyelll4982 it was written in 1850, 170 years ago,
@@coy2960 pretty sure you understood what i said, i meant it was written a long time ago and if i wanted to be accurate i would've been accurate.
@@eyelll4982 yeah, didnt judge you, just gave
The date if anyone was interested.
I think this piece sounds like Chopin would live longer about 40 years old to compose nocturnes.
eh
This was composed 1 yr after his death not 40 yrs
@@usernameatusernameperiodsh2168 He said if Chopin lived to 40. Chopin died at 39 so if he lived to 40, he would've lived 1 more year.
@@thenotsookayguy hmmm right sorry for my stupidity
@@usernameatusernameperiodsh2168 Not your fault, the grammar is atrocious.
The third A on measure 4 for the RH on #3 - isn't it supposed to be an A natural? Why do I hear it as an A flat?
You heard it wrong. Its an A natural
and also it's measure 3
Score for number three isn't correct(:
👍👍👍👍
Always wondered why people choose to phrase things over the bar line its really confusing to hear/read. LH parts around 1:06 for example. Surely that could be written in an alternative way (with accents on certain notes to emphasis the '3' feel if thats what they want but not to be written over the bar line?)
Youll find that in many liszt scores very odd beamings are used. The second one also has very strange beaming as the 16th notes dont go across the staves as they normally would
He created a mysterious mood with those offbeat slurs, no better way to arrange it.
11:21
11:17
11:13
Why isn't it available?
What do you mean by that?
Never mind; the video wasn't playing ("this video is not available"); but now it is working for some reason...
No rubato. Awful
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
to be honest this recording is awful. the player plays them very coldly.