37:30 i find it hard to believe you came to such a conclusion on interest. It would have set the ummah back even further. It's exactly that kind of attitude that brought to ummah under the yolk of the western powers. If anything, i would say ummah is in need of istihsaan of the early hanafis now more than ever. Overall, excellent overview which you went into even more detail. Thank so informative
Mashallah great lecture, and great research. I noticed that 'MISC' was listed as a reason as well, for quite a number of instances of Istihsan. Were these just 'single instances' that you grouped into one category? or do you have any idea of what they were? I think I can see some validity to the now-defunct perspective that 'there should be some subjectivity of the scholars' - albeit not to the extent of 'a scholar can make a ruling without any daleel'.
![สาวเมืองเพชร - ธีเดช ทองอภิชาติ [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kEt7F9PvO3I/mqdefault.jpg)
37:30 i find it hard to believe you came to such a conclusion on interest.
It would have set the ummah back even further.
It's exactly that kind of attitude that brought to ummah under the yolk of the western powers.
If anything, i would say ummah is in need of istihsaan of the early hanafis now more than ever.
Overall, excellent overview which you went into even more detail. Thank so informative
Mashallah great lecture, and great research. I noticed that 'MISC' was listed as a reason as well, for quite a number of instances of Istihsan. Were these just 'single instances' that you grouped into one category? or do you have any idea of what they were? I think I can see some validity to the now-defunct perspective that 'there should be some subjectivity of the scholars' - albeit not to the extent of 'a scholar can make a ruling without any daleel'.
I subscribed this channel