Nice review. This blaster looks pretty good. The good thing about using regular AA batteries is that you can get them just about anywhere, and are easy to swap out. Built in rechargeables means swapping is difficult. Replaceable ones are better, but you still have to buy several, and carry a charger everywhere. I think the chronograph readings were within margin of error. Readings can be affecfed by several factors, and ideally a unit should be calibrated every so often to check for accuracy. You will most likely get different readings from the same blaster on another chrono.
@another3997 Interesting take on the battery situation! I appreciate your thoughts! While I think you're right about the chronograph readings having many influential factors that can change the reading. Mine seems to be pretty accurate at the moment. My original Uproar also came short of 150. But in my testing, blasters firing the exact same round, such as the Igniter or Twist Shot, easily achieve that box claim. The Igniter in completely different weather conditions and the Twist Shot at the same time that I filmed this review. But I totally understand where you're coming from, and I could be off! Again, I greatly appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! :)
I liked the Uproar already, simple, cheaper, full auto gel blaster. Glow in the dark makes this amazing
@@QuietWyatt2005 It definitely makes it more compelling to me!
Great video man glad they kinda fixed this blaster
Thanks! And yeah, I like that they seemed to have updated it for the better!
FQ
Another great review. I like the color scheme on this one more than the red and white. Keep up the great work.
@nicholasmazzarella2720 I totally agree. I love the color scheme!
Nice review. This blaster looks pretty good. The good thing about using regular AA batteries is that you can get them just about anywhere, and are easy to swap out. Built in rechargeables means swapping is difficult. Replaceable ones are better, but you still have to buy several, and carry a charger everywhere. I think the chronograph readings were within margin of error. Readings can be affecfed by several factors, and ideally a unit should be calibrated every so often to check for accuracy. You will most likely get different readings from the same blaster on another chrono.
@another3997 Interesting take on the battery situation! I appreciate your thoughts! While I think you're right about the chronograph readings having many influential factors that can change the reading. Mine seems to be pretty accurate at the moment. My original Uproar also came short of 150. But in my testing, blasters firing the exact same round, such as the Igniter or Twist Shot, easily achieve that box claim. The Igniter in completely different weather conditions and the Twist Shot at the same time that I filmed this review. But I totally understand where you're coming from, and I could be off! Again, I greatly appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! :)
You lucky duck, I have the review filmed but been to busy to edit it😂 I’m going to upload it soon!
@@oakleyentertainment 😅
Nightfall uproar is awesome looking
@@EricSlater-pj7rc I agree!
I like these videos, can you make a video about the quadrant? I’m pretty sure it is from target
@@JacksonLapp-md3dv Great to hear! Yes, I'll be reviewing it! :)
Can you imagine using this thing *with* the Nightfall Hopper?
@@someidiotwithanerfgun You'll need eclipse glasses! 😅
I need to get this one
It is neat!
Its illegal in Australia
134th view 😁
@@ArcticFox1290 ;)