Honestly I'd say James Cameron is the veritable authority on the titanic, his movie may have been a mild dramatization, his books and research are extremely detailed. And he argued with the Mythbusters that while rose and Jack could have both survived on the door if they tied their vests to it and were very careful, but his argument was that doing so not only was never done during the actualy sinking by any of the 6 survivors in the water, but also it would undermine the level of desperation and panic all the swimmers were experiencing. That kind of slow rational thought just didn't place in their minds because adrenaline is the enemy of creativity.
I’d say the most accurate theory is the one presented in the book “On a Sea of Glass”. It was written by _true_ Titanic historians and has become the be-all end-all of Titanic literature.
I am taking cold showers daily, and first time I did it my body wanted to do anything to get out. Gasping for air when the ice cold water went over my head, my arms seems to want to find something to grab on to and me having to will myself to stand and accept the suck for a minute. Can’t imagine what below zero water does to you in pitch black darkness with people screaming around you.
He raised the bar and rid the world of Honey Boo Boo 🎶 His name is James, James Cameron, The bravest pioneer. No budget too steep, no sea too deep, Who's That? It's him, James Cameron.
Also remember that the one-piece theory was held as the official way until the wreck was found and the survivors who said the ship broke apart were rebuked until then. So the titanic had to break apart in a way where it wasn't noticable to most of the survivors on a dark night, which should omit any overly-"overt" theories.
The titanic was just a dark silhouette against the pitch-black nightsky miles away. People who believed it sunk in one piece mistook the break-up sounds as the ship's boilers exploding. It's clear that no matter the way it broke up, half of the survivors would say it sunk in one piece.
@@Hue_Sam they could see it, your eyes adjust to the dark and they were out there for 2 hours watching it. Don't forget to take moonlight into consideration as well.
The one piece was unlikely for a few reasons,one being that the ship split in half(it was found like that) and I would say the v break is also unlikely because if it were to happen,both the stern and the bow would be more destroyed than they are now
And the way the wreck is,the evidence points directly to how the titanic couldn’t of sank for both ways,seeing that it could’ve sank straight up and then split,and the stern raised up and it went under the sea
@@kleo5696 doing so would have left the stern very close to the bow, the stern is almost 2000 feet, meaning the broke apart either at the surface or just below it, and at the surface makes the most sense because during the free fall there wouldn't have been any forces trying to pull them apart, also when they bow and stern separate at the ocean flow, the stern is almost always infront of the bow like with the Edmund Fitzgerald. This comes from the bow slamming into the ground and the stern essentially ripping itself forward under inertia.
To be honest, I really like your theory. After all, not all survivors reported seeing the ship break in two, so it had to be subtle enough that most wouldn't notice it, and yours also explains what happened to the middle section of the ship, which is still missing to this day. Very nice.
It has come out that people lied about the the ship not going down like Mr. Ismay and he lied about wanting the Boilers all turned on to. He wanted to make headlines and he did. It even came out that people where paid to lie about how the ship went down.
@@stephaniefox896 That's pretty interesting and at the same time I believe it 100% people will try to make money even if it means shamefully lying about how 1500 people died.
@@Corxed it had to do something about the inquiry that happened after the ship went down Mr Ismay was under investigation and they where wanting to see what happened but he was a coward and lied
Of course no one saw it break in two. It was dark as hell in the middle of the ocean with no moon. when the lights went out on the ship I doubt anyone could see the ship anymore, no matter how close or far.
I’m pretty sure the 1995 theory is the one almost everyone follows + the one on the movie. The older and newer versions are a little convincing too tho
JC’s 2012 theory is the modern one accepted by the Titanic Community, the 1995 theory suffers in that the ship would be unable to reach a list that high before snapping due to pressure
Your theory is a little true beacuse you had the 2nd funnel going down in the crack of the ship but that funnel caught on fire when it was the final plunge. So yeah a saviour said that
I really like the theories about how it sank and urs aswell. I'm not a fan of the v-break tho. However it sank, must be frightening for those who were on the boat to see the ship going down and around 1500 people die.
The only theory that we do know, with 100% certainty, that is not true is the one piece theory. That one was busted the moment Robert Ballard discovered the Titanic and saw her in 2 massive pieces.
In my opinion this video would be a good video for a person who is just learning about titanic, not too detailed but not too vague either. I think this would absolutely be a good starter into studying titanic and it’s history/disaster! Keep up the good work!
Like, the wreck even shows that the break was rather messy due to it occurring in heavily reinforced parts of the ship, so the theory with two superstructure towers makes a lot of sense
That’s actually really clever. Even if this isn’t the true story, these theories could pretty much all be true (except for the one piece theory). Amazing job on the animation as well.
all the reports say it broke when sticking straight up as we know it and then when it snapped the stern rolled over on its side then got pulled straight up and sank
James Cameron’s theory could also be right. You see, The titanics stern did last a bit before it sank because it took a while for the water to flood the lower decks of the stern
I always theorized that it broke in half under/near under the water from the 3rd funnel. Even though the boats were further out there is no way so many people would have not seen it break like it did in Cameron’s movie. There were also survivors like Jack Thayer and Lightoller who were close to the ship, but didn’t see the break. Lightoller said She went down in one piece, while Thayer claimed he did see the ship buckle but not break. The break happening below/ near below the water would have given the illusion that the ship went down in one piece.
Yeah I suspect this too. How come the ship broke above the water yet almost everyone survived saw it sunk one whole. It's must be broke on their way under the water.
@@Eza_yuta I suppose you are misinformed. Several eyewitnesses recall seeing Titanic break apart, though they were contradictory about details. Here are some of them: • Thomas Ranger: "The forward end of the ship went underneath and seemed to break off, and the afterpart came back on a level keel" • Emily Ryerson: "She seemed to break in half as if cut with a knife, and as the bow went under the lights went out" • Frederick Barrett: "Then she broke in half, the weight of the half out of the water being too great a strain, I suppose" • Joseph Scarrot: "The ship was right up on end then. Suddently she broke in two between the third and fourth funnel" • Charlotte Collyer: "Two other explosions followed dull and heavy, as if below the surface. The Titanic broke into two before my eyes" • Jack Thayer: "Suddenly the whole superstructure of the ship appeared to split, well forward to midship, and blow or buckle upwards" There are many more. I'd recommend visiting Paul Lee's website, he has a collection of survivor accounts to read.
It cracked on the surface, but went down in one mangled piece. That’s why there were conflicting accounts. The bow dragged the still partly connected and not fully flooded stern down to the depths, until they separated somewhere in the water column. Water resistance on open damage on the way down and pressure implosion account for the greater damage to the stern.
@munastronaut you messed up your definitions a little bit a theory explains WHY something happens (explains a scientific law, which is WHAT happens) a hypothesis is an educated guess on what the result of an experiment will be.
Thank you for the fascinating video! Simple and straight to the point. I had no idea there were this many theories regarding the sinking of the ship, and I was surprised to see that in 1912, the main theory was that the ship sank as a whole, though that surprise might just be due to me being "used to" the 1995 theory, and there may not be a whole not of data to go by yet at the year of the disaster. Have a nice day.
@@daniko4447 Well James Cameron’s Version from 2012 actually includes many factors into account, so it’s most likely the Titanic sank like shown in that animation
The V break version where the ship's bow rises up during the break is physically impossible since the stern was mostly watertight at this point and the bow-mid section was completely filled up with water it was simply too heavy for that stern to make it rise up.
The officer Lightoller stated he saw the stern of the ship go perpendicular at the last moment. He was there and saw it close range. One presumes he is a most reliable witness to what happened above the water.
Before 1985, not only did we expect to see the ship in one piece, but there was also supposed to be a clearly defined continuous 300 foot long gash in her hull.
My theory is it starts to flow all 6 compartments after the water reaches the first funnel the funnel falls down then it splits into 2 the second funnel falls down then 20 mins more the next funnel falls down and then the next funnel falls down then its the final plunge after that the lifeboat are just sailing for like 10-20 mins then the Carpathia comes.
Ur theory is actually pretty good and i have my own theory but i'm not going to show it idk why but ur theory kinda makes sense to me and btw ur animations are great :)
Is it easy to assume that Aaron1912 has the worst theory among Titanic fans? I’m new to this scene, but I keep hearing how people generally don’t like him.
I dont know which one 1985 is, but the front mast is supposed to fall when the bow is underwater, bouncing around on the bridge and ripping the bridge off.
Excellent job on these, I think it's a combination... I do believe the James Cameron one is accurate, the sturn would've hinged on the double bottom hull. Ohhhh boy, what I would give to have witnesso this event as terrible as it was.
They’re all so similar but we will probably never know how it really sank. We could probably get the most accurate sinking result by combining ever single possible one
I think the front started sinking, the hull broke but the bottom was still attached (some other people think so too), the bottom which was still attached pulled the back part up vertical while the front went under, then it broke completely and the front sank, not long after the back too.
from my personal research the rear half of the ship filled with water faster after the break and it actually sank before the front end. the front end had a bunch of air pockets slowing its plummet
you may not know it the survivor who said about the v break later said that it didn’t break like that he originally thought it did he said it broke the way we know it
@@steamshiphistory8469 ah fair, but the survivor im thinking of was a woman and her daughter said something similar to her mothers account except that she didnt see the break bc her mom covered her eyes for a while in the lifeboat.
Your theory is very close to the one presented in the book “On a Sea of Glass”. This theory has the Titanic break into two big parts but also two other smaller parts in which the superstructure failed. After looking into this theory and hearing the evidence I support it, I also believe the double hull theory. V breaks are impossible and Aaron1912’s theory is practically and physically impossible.
1912 was in A Night To Remember and 1995 was in Titanic? Did the Titanic 1996 miniseries show it as 1985 or 1995? And I didn't know James Cameron wrote books about Titanic, I've got to see those. As for his 2012 theory it looks almost identical to 1995. Does anyone have any ideas about the 2005 theory? Why did this person think it broke in 4 sections? The V Break looks ridiculous imo, and I don't think the bow being full of water could have been pulled back towards the surface by the lighter stern. The 1912 V break has more possibility.
The thing is the flipaclip canvas is not big enough to include both, but i will definetly remaster it sometime and maybe add how it landed on the sea floor!
@@Kapitan_Creeper the theory is very weird for me. As a ship nerd being almost 6 years i believe only the james camerons and 1995 theorys. And the v-break is a new thing what i heard and its so strange for me. YES it can be true in 5% chance but yeah i think its just false theory
Just to note, by today's research and knowledge, the 1995/1997 theory is heavily inaccurate. It is also overly dramatic because of being for a movie, like the exaggerated 45 degree angle before the break which is not even possible because if the bow of the ship took a angle higher than 35 degrees, the boilers would slide, but they remain firmly on their seats in the wreck.
I feel like people try to explain the amount of disappearance on the stern from the break. When is reality as the stern sunk to the floor it was shredded apart because of the way it went down. The bow how ever did not go down the same as the stern. Also over the past 100 years the stern has sat on the ocean floor it most likely was eaten away by rust and pressure.
@@crazyeddie1981 No what im saying is that because of the way the stern when down after the implosion it was shredded apart and after long years of bacterial corrosion. It is backed up by this because of where parts of the wreckage are.
And now, want to know how it really happened? Too bad. Time machines don't exist and bright underwater lights and camera's didn't exist in 1912. We'll just never really know.
To improve your theory, I tell you that the fourth funnel fell to the water level, due to the testimony of officer Lightoller, who saw from a distance the fourth funnel fall.
my theory is that the front piece sinks and the back peace breaks like normally but is still not separated. just the under piece of it is connected. so once the back piece is submerged, it seperates
aaron 1912s is like jack thayers as jack thayer thought he saw the bow come up out of the water and he even sketched the sinking showing the break up happening like that
A big "no" to everything that you said. Thayer never, ever said that he saw the bow come up (because when it did come up momentarily, he had just jumped and was under water). Thayer didn't make any sketches while in the middle of the night, all wet, hanging on to the upside-down lifeboat, so the newspaper caption that says that Thayer did so was a flat-out lie. Skidmore on board the Carpathia made those sketches. Five of the six sketches do match things that people saw, but the time of day shown on them doesn't match Thayer's writings either, so that's more falsehood. It's the 4th sketch, labeled "forward end floats, then sinks" that is completely false. People who saw or heard about that sketch then repeated it as if it had authority, but it was a false story that got made into a myth by its re-telling.
There was a surviving passenger on the Carpathia who described how it sank. Even then it might be wrong but its the best evidence. (It was basically James Cameron’s 2012 theory)
Well never know what truly happened. Even survivors probably don't know for sure. Either way it was a tragedy. I think what was most aggravating was they didn't have enough life boats for everyone
Can you do some tutorial to do this animation? I once use flipaclip too but i don't really know how to do it since I don't have any kind of animation skills
I actually think the Aaron1912 V break looks better than the first V break. I still can't figure out why it would rip from top to bottom rather than bottom to top ...but ok.
Not all theories, but nice job I guess. However an explanation for your theory could be nice, from just looking at an quick animation, it's hard to know what caused everything.
Watch drain the Titanic. Interesting they came to conclusion that it split but stayed connected closer to the bottom and the stern spun like a tornado after separating. They mapped out the debris field & linked them to where they were on ship.
@@Kapitan_Creeper I agree. there's a difference between having an opinion, and willingly spreading false information that's not based on reality or the laws of physics. Aaron1912 is basically the flat earth society of the Titanic community
I like the parks stephenson theory from 2005 because of the kind of split between funnel 2 and funnel 3 (im not saying that your animation is wrong i know i read the pinned comment that its not 100% accurate but its nice keep your animations going!)
My theory: the bow floods in a port list 1st funnel falls next 2nd and 3rd then the split takes the 2nd and 3rd then down last funnel grabbed by a davit then falls
![The Sinking of HMHS Britannic [Minecraft Animation]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/enh4Jupx2M8/mqdefault.jpg)
Time Skip
One-piece Theory: 0:00
1985 Theory: 0:08
1995 Theory: 0:15
Parks Stephenson Theory: 0:24
V-Break Theory: 0:33
Roy Mengot Theory: 0:41
Aaron1912 V-Break Theory: 0:50
James Cameron Theory: 1:00
TornadoHarry Theory: 1:08
Kapitan Creeper Theory: 1:17
That’s all folks, hope this saves lives lol
Thank’s for te pin man
We need more of these people on yt🥰
Thats what she said
The one piece is real🤩
@@Cybersaurus5783can we get much higher
As you may have noticed, the ship sank.
Bruh
😒😐
BRUH!!! YOU JUST BLEW MY MIND!!!!
I didn’t see that, thanks for pointing it out
why is this just now getting comments a year later
AND IM ONE OF THEM
@@Pentagon2763 yuh why
Honestly I'd say James Cameron is the veritable authority on the titanic, his movie may have been a mild dramatization, his books and research are extremely detailed. And he argued with the Mythbusters that while rose and Jack could have both survived on the door if they tied their vests to it and were very careful, but his argument was that doing so not only was never done during the actualy sinking by any of the 6 survivors in the water, but also it would undermine the level of desperation and panic all the swimmers were experiencing. That kind of slow rational thought just didn't place in their minds because adrenaline is the enemy of creativity.
James Cameron is a Titanic historian?
I’d say the most accurate theory is the one presented in the book “On a Sea of Glass”. It was written by _true_ Titanic historians and has become the be-all end-all of Titanic literature.
I am taking cold showers daily, and first time I did it my body wanted to do anything to get out. Gasping for air when the ice cold water went over my head, my arms seems to want to find something to grab on to and me having to will myself to stand and accept the suck for a minute. Can’t imagine what below zero water does to you in pitch black darkness with people screaming around you.
La version de Cameron est la plus logique. Mais ça ne reflète pas forcément ce qui s'est réellement passé.
He raised the bar and rid the world of Honey Boo Boo 🎶 His name is James, James Cameron, The bravest pioneer. No budget too steep, no sea too deep, Who's That? It's him, James Cameron.
Also remember that the one-piece theory was held as the official way until the wreck was found and the survivors who said the ship broke apart were rebuked until then. So the titanic had to break apart in a way where it wasn't noticable to most of the survivors on a dark night, which should omit any overly-"overt" theories.
Well that rules out James Camerons movie completely lol
The titanic was just a dark silhouette against the pitch-black nightsky miles away. People who believed it sunk in one piece mistook the break-up sounds as the ship's boilers exploding. It's clear that no matter the way it broke up, half of the survivors would say it sunk in one piece.
the night sky was so dark that they can’t even see the ship at all when it blacked out.
@@Hue_Sam they could see it, your eyes adjust to the dark and they were out there for 2 hours watching it. Don't forget to take moonlight into consideration as well.
@@zachbraxton1997 there was no moon that night. The only light sources were the stars.
The one piece was unlikely for a few reasons,one being that the ship split in half(it was found like that) and I would say the v break is also unlikely because if it were to happen,both the stern and the bow would be more destroyed than they are now
And the way the wreck is,the evidence points directly to how the titanic couldn’t of sank for both ways,seeing that it could’ve sank straight up and then split,and the stern raised up and it went under the sea
but then again, the one piece theory could happen if they were to be split in half when they crashed into the underground sea.
@@kleo5696 doing so would have left the stern very close to the bow, the stern is almost 2000 feet, meaning the broke apart either at the surface or just below it, and at the surface makes the most sense because during the free fall there wouldn't have been any forces trying to pull them apart, also when they bow and stern separate at the ocean flow, the stern is almost always infront of the bow like with the Edmund Fitzgerald. This comes from the bow slamming into the ground and the stern essentially ripping itself forward under inertia.
@@theduke7539 i did not understand what you just typed but atleast i learnt that the onepiece theory isn't realistic
@@kleo5696 but it couldn’t of happened because the stern is 600 miles away from the bow
To be honest, I really like your theory. After all, not all survivors reported seeing the ship break in two, so it had to be subtle enough that most wouldn't notice it, and yours also explains what happened to the middle section of the ship, which is still missing to this day. Very nice.
It has come out that people lied about the the ship not going down like Mr. Ismay and he lied about wanting the Boilers all turned on to. He wanted to make headlines and he did. It even came out that people where paid to lie about how the ship went down.
@@stephaniefox896 That's pretty interesting and at the same time I believe it 100% people will try to make money even if it means shamefully lying about how 1500 people died.
@@Corxed it had to do something about the inquiry that happened after the ship went down Mr Ismay was under investigation and they where wanting to see what happened but he was a coward and lied
Of course no one saw it break in two. It was dark as hell in the middle of the ocean with no moon. when the lights went out on the ship I doubt anyone could see the ship anymore, no matter how close or far.
It's possible the mid-ship went down with the stern and was destroyed when it impacted the seafloor
I’m pretty sure the 1995 theory is the one almost everyone follows + the one on the movie. The older and newer versions are a little convincing too tho
JC’s 2012 theory is the modern one accepted by the Titanic Community, the 1995 theory suffers in that the ship would be unable to reach a list that high before snapping due to pressure
@@dylan_daugherty_ not really, the accepted one currently is from the On a Sea of Glass animation on TH-cam, released in May 2021.
i like roy mengot 2008
Though*
Your theory is a little true beacuse you had the 2nd funnel going down in the crack of the ship but that funnel caught on fire when it was the final plunge. So yeah a saviour said that
uhhh i was not focusing at the funnel falls at all i focused on the break itself
I see
Yours is cool but the bad quality is mainly the many pieces that break off , normally that wouldn’t happen , otherwise great
@@joshuayoung8605 ok thx
@@Kapitan_Creeper why did the whole part of the ship go to peices?
I really like the theories about how it sank and urs aswell. I'm not a fan of the v-break tho. However it sank, must be frightening for those who were on the boat to see the ship going down and around 1500 people die.
The only theory that we do know, with 100% certainty, that is not true is the one piece theory. That one was busted the moment Robert Ballard discovered the Titanic and saw her in 2 massive pieces.
The first v break for how it was inaccurate atleast looks like how someone could confuse the shearing
@@beaudavis3808 THE ONE PIECE IS REAL!!
@@mapleflag6518 bro its not look at the wreck
@@CaptainMav1735 You really didn’t get the joke did you?
In my opinion this video would be a good video for a person who is just learning about titanic, not too detailed but not too vague either. I think this would absolutely be a good starter into studying titanic and it’s history/disaster! Keep up the good work!
Ada data bang menikah terus ... Tidak mau baik hahahah ada baik ...
“Not too detailed” - I think you and I have very different meaning of what “just learning about titanic” is 😂😂
Like, the wreck even shows that the break was rather messy due to it occurring in heavily reinforced parts of the ship, so the theory with two superstructure towers makes a lot of sense
TITANC
1985 people: "ok so the titanic split in half then turned into egg while it sank"
i hope people get what i ment lmao
That was like the first theory ever, i think they made it disintegrate because of the debris field
i understand what you mean tho lol
That’s actually really clever. Even if this isn’t the true story, these theories could pretty much all be true (except for the one piece theory). Amazing job on the animation as well.
Thx!
all the reports say it broke when sticking straight up as we know it and then when it snapped the stern rolled over on its side then got pulled straight up and sank
No v break though.
@@RobertPSmith336 yea that’s a myth
V break is also impossible
James Cameron’s theory could also be right. You see, The titanics stern did last a bit before it sank because it took a while for the water to flood the lower decks of the stern
You included mine! Thank you!
Youre welcome :)
I always theorized that it broke in half under/near under the water from the 3rd funnel. Even though the boats were further out there is no way so many people would have not seen it break like it did in Cameron’s movie. There were also survivors like Jack Thayer and Lightoller who were close to the ship, but didn’t see the break. Lightoller said She went down in one piece, while Thayer claimed he did see the ship buckle but not break. The break happening below/ near below the water would have given the illusion that the ship went down in one piece.
Yeah I suspect this too. How come the ship broke above the water yet almost everyone survived saw it sunk one whole. It's must be broke on their way under the water.
@@Eza_yuta I suppose you are misinformed. Several eyewitnesses recall seeing Titanic break apart, though they were contradictory about details. Here are some of them:
• Thomas Ranger: "The forward end of the ship went underneath and seemed to break off, and the afterpart came back on a level keel"
• Emily Ryerson: "She seemed to break in half as if cut with a knife, and as the bow went under the lights went out"
• Frederick Barrett: "Then she broke in half, the weight of the half out of the water being too great a strain, I suppose"
• Joseph Scarrot: "The ship was right up on end then. Suddently she broke in two between the third and fourth funnel"
• Charlotte Collyer: "Two other explosions followed dull and heavy, as if below the surface. The Titanic broke into two before my eyes"
• Jack Thayer: "Suddenly the whole superstructure of the ship appeared to split, well forward to midship, and blow or buckle upwards"
There are many more. I'd recommend visiting Paul Lee's website, he has a collection of survivor accounts to read.
I appreciate that you included Aaron1912's psychotic theory lmfao
It cracked on the surface, but went down in one mangled piece. That’s why there were conflicting accounts. The bow dragged the still partly connected and not fully flooded stern down to the depths, until they separated somewhere in the water column. Water resistance on open damage on the way down and pressure implosion account for the greater damage to the stern.
honestly this seems like the most convincing theory, would also explain the missing pieces that could've blown away on account of the implosion
Yeah I am agree. This theory of broke into two under the water is most logical yet under rated and under search.
That's how I always imagined it went down.
but the survivor told that the titanic literally breaks on the surface. but the people doesn't believe them
who knows maybe it breaks on the surface area, but that doesn't relate on the survivor statement.
fun fact: theres a whole video disproving aaron1912s vbreak theory
I really like this animation, very detailed while still being easy to understand. great work my friend!!
"even the god can't sink it"
God : OK
*spawn ice berg*
The 2nd last one or the James Cameron ones were the best and probably most accurate
Thanks!
@@TornadoHarry yeah i believe in your theory the most after mine tbh
Although, your theory is more of a hypothesis than a theory, it’s decently supported. Nice video
Thx
@iamdipseh hypothesis is something that cannot be proved yet, and a theory is something that might be proved by an action
@Walter IV Only to a layman
@munastronaut you messed up your definitions a little bit
a theory explains WHY something happens (explains a scientific law, which is WHAT happens)
a hypothesis is an educated guess on what the result of an experiment will be.
Thank you for the fascinating video! Simple and straight to the point. I had no idea there were this many theories regarding the sinking of the ship, and I was surprised to see that in 1912, the main theory was that the ship sank as a whole, though that surprise might just be due to me being "used to" the 1995 theory, and there may not be a whole not of data to go by yet at the year of the disaster. Have a nice day.
And the world will never know how the Titanic truly sunk
Yeeeesssssss
i'm sure all of them are dead, and i don't think it would be a great idea
@@daniko4447 Well James Cameron’s Version from 2012 actually includes many factors into account, so it’s most likely the Titanic sank like shown in that animation
@Randy the last survivor of the titanic died a few years back. she was a newborn during the sinking, so she wouldnt know regardless.
@Randy and it was very dark the moment the Titanic sank. The survivors couldn't see almost nothing.
During the v break some how the ship moved up like Godzilla was doing bench presses under it.
The V break version where the ship's bow rises up during the break is physically impossible since the stern was mostly watertight at this point and the bow-mid section was completely filled up with water it was simply too heavy for that stern to make it rise up.
So were talking about me now
@@kerotomas1 Exactly
This was cool thank you for making it
0:12
Stern: what a Nice day to sleep
I'ma be real, I have een studying the titanic for 2 years now. Everything really leads to James Cameron's way scientifically.
I've been doing that since 2018
@Evty that's what you read on Facebook
@@nickbell4984 “that’s what you read on facebook” that’s what you said here
The officer Lightoller stated he saw the stern of the ship go perpendicular at the last moment. He was there and saw it close range. One presumes he is a most reliable witness to what happened above the water.
Dang you gotta love the 2012 titanic movie by Robert Ballard☠️
Before 1985, not only did we expect to see the ship in one piece, but there was also supposed to be a clearly defined continuous 300 foot long gash in her hull.
The 2012 Cameron’s theory seems most accurate to me.
Its kinda interesting thinking about these theories.
AYO 1 MILLION VIEWS ON THIS. Wow congractulations
Cool animation👍
My theory is it starts to flow all 6 compartments after the water reaches the first funnel the funnel falls down then it splits into 2 the second funnel falls down then 20 mins more the next funnel falls down and then the next funnel falls down then its the final plunge after that the lifeboat are just sailing for like 10-20 mins then the Carpathia comes.
This is some nice animation
Thanks :)
Ur theory is cool
Coool Titanic vid!
cool animation!
thx
The fact he did on FlipaClip great job
oh wow you have your own theory, your a genius.
Ur theory is actually pretty good and i have my own theory but i'm not going to show it idk why but ur theory kinda makes sense to me and btw ur animations are great :)
Thx!
Is it easy to assume that Aaron1912 has the worst theory among Titanic fans? I’m new to this scene, but I keep hearing how people generally don’t like him.
The dude is like a flat earther.
I dont know which one 1985 is, but the front mast is supposed to fall when the bow is underwater, bouncing around on the bridge and ripping the bridge off.
That was the return to titanic one, the 1985 is the theory ballard made when they first discovered the titanic
Good animating!
your version looked neat
Maybe it’s all of them just in other parallel universes…
LMAO.
Excellent job on these, I think it's a combination... I do believe the James Cameron one is accurate, the sturn would've hinged on the double bottom hull. Ohhhh boy, what I would give to have witnesso this event as terrible as it was.
Stern*
sick animations
They’re all so similar but we will probably never know how it really sank. We could probably get the most accurate sinking result by combining ever single possible one
I think the front started sinking, the hull broke but the bottom was still attached (some other people think so too), the bottom which was still attached pulled the back part up vertical while the front went under, then it broke completely and the front sank, not long after the back too.
Абсолютно близкая к истине теория. Единственное, разлучились эти две части всё таки глубоко под водой.
The double bottom failed first
Давно хотел посмотреть все версии гибели Титаника, спасибо :)
Незачто :)
from my personal research the rear half of the ship filled with water faster after the break and it actually sank before the front end. the front end had a bunch of air pockets slowing its plummet
i love your theory
Thx :)
I remember hearing a survivor story that makes me think the v-break has more validity.
you may not know it the survivor who said about the v break later said that it didn’t break like that he originally thought it did he said it broke the way we know it
@@steamshiphistory8469 ah fair, but the survivor im thinking of was a woman and her daughter said something similar to her mothers account except that she didnt see the break bc her mom covered her eyes for a while in the lifeboat.
Your theory is very close to the one presented in the book “On a Sea of Glass”. This theory has the Titanic break into two big parts but also two other smaller parts in which the superstructure failed.
After looking into this theory and hearing the evidence I support it, I also believe the double hull theory.
V breaks are impossible and Aaron1912’s theory is practically and physically impossible.
0:15 the one we are most familiar with because it is presented in the 1997 James Cameron classic.
Good animation
animating is hard, this deserves a like.
Thanks!
1912 was in A Night To Remember and 1995 was in Titanic? Did the Titanic 1996 miniseries show it as 1985 or 1995? And I didn't know James Cameron wrote books about Titanic, I've got to see those. As for his 2012 theory it looks almost identical to 1995. Does anyone have any ideas about the 2005 theory? Why did this person think it broke in 4 sections? The V Break looks ridiculous imo, and I don't think the bow being full of water could have been pulled back towards the surface by the lighter stern. The 1912 V break has more possibility.
Cool vid!
Thanks :)
you should do animations on what happens while they sink + contacting the ocean floor. that may be insightful
The thing is the flipaclip canvas is not big enough to include both, but i will definetly remaster it sometime and maybe add how it landed on the sea floor!
I believe in the 1995 theory. V-break theory in my opinion is not even possible in any way. Thats just my opinion so i hope nobody dosent get mad
Yeah i believe in 1995 too and also TornadoHarry's Theory is also pretty realistic and yeah V break is strange but with low chances COULD be possible
@@Kapitan_Creeper the theory is very weird for me. As a ship nerd being almost 6 years i believe only the james camerons and 1995 theorys. And the v-break is a new thing what i heard and its so strange for me. YES it can be true in 5% chance but yeah i think its just false theory
@@FIREIKTRONOMIA. for me too
Just to note, by today's research and knowledge, the 1995/1997 theory is heavily inaccurate. It is also overly dramatic because of being for a movie, like the exaggerated 45 degree angle before the break which is not even possible because if the bow of the ship took a angle higher than 35 degrees, the boilers would slide, but they remain firmly on their seats in the wreck.
@@GamePlayerZ1912 aaaand whats the Problem with that? I put todays versions too and the 1995.
Your theory is good i think that fits well but maybe just add more sense like the stern stop moving while the front of the shio is sinking or like idk
Yeah i had strangely made a small ,,stop" there accidentaly while animating, but it really wasnt supposed to happen
the titanic in 1912 was split into 2 halves, the first one in the front that sank, and the 2nd one that floated back and sank
I just saw this and im getting so much nostalgia-
There is also one that is sunk down deep and then broke, that is from national geography.
Was scrolling down my recommendations when i found this masterpiece
Thanks :)
Its really entertaining to watch ngl
Never thought i would come back to ocean liners
It’s crazy how it’s been 110 years and that they Sink🎉
my version: *bends" *stress" *crack" *a deck holding" *detach" *you died" (titanic bow part looked bent hard)
I feel like people try to explain the amount of disappearance on the stern from the break. When is reality as the stern sunk to the floor it was shredded apart because of the way it went down. The bow how ever did not go down the same as the stern. Also over the past 100 years the stern has sat on the ocean floor it most likely was eaten away by rust and pressure.
The stern broke apart due to an implosion because of all the air trying to escape the stern.
@@sindylowry82 partly yeah, but it was already underwater almost half a mile.
Steel doesn't come apart, so no no implosion happend
@@cheese-dh6bc so are u saying that every ship or sub that imploded bc of trapped are and ripped itself apart is false
@@crazyeddie1981 No what im saying is that because of the way the stern when down after the implosion it was shredded apart and after long years of bacterial corrosion. It is backed up by this because of where parts of the wreckage are.
And now, want to know how it really happened? Too bad. Time machines don't exist and bright underwater lights and camera's didn't exist in 1912. We'll just never really know.
i love that your video has no audio thanks
Okay it's cool man
To improve your theory, I tell you that the fourth funnel fell to the water level, due to the testimony of officer Lightoller, who saw from a distance the fourth funnel fall.
My theory is MY theory!
Xd
@@Kapitan_Creeper damn bro
@@Kapitan_Creeper sorry
@@Mtscountry its fine
How did you get that effect of the ship being able to been seen under water? Also i agree with all 1995+ theories, nice animation! 👍
i made this animation in flipaclip, and there you can set the visibility of a layer from 0% to 100%, so i set it on roughly 50%
Thanks 😊
my theory is that the front piece sinks and the back peace breaks like normally but is still not separated. just the under piece of it is connected. so once the back piece is submerged, it seperates
aaron 1912s is like jack thayers as jack thayer thought he saw the bow come up out of the water and he even sketched the sinking showing the break up happening like that
A big "no" to everything that you said. Thayer never, ever said that he saw the bow come up (because when it did come up momentarily, he had just jumped and was under water). Thayer didn't make any sketches while in the middle of the night, all wet, hanging on to the upside-down lifeboat, so the newspaper caption that says that Thayer did so was a flat-out lie. Skidmore on board the Carpathia made those sketches. Five of the six sketches do match things that people saw, but the time of day shown on them doesn't match Thayer's writings either, so that's more falsehood. It's the 4th sketch, labeled "forward end floats, then sinks" that is completely false. People who saw or heard about that sketch then repeated it as if it had authority, but it was a false story that got made into a myth by its re-telling.
James Cameron’s 2012 theory is basically THE MOST ACCURATE but I still like your idea :)
Thx :)
No problemo
It is the most accurate.
@@RobertPSmith336 there are no accurate and there are no unaccurate theories cuz WE are not survivors and we dont saw how it sunk
There was a surviving passenger on the Carpathia who described how it sank. Even then it might be wrong but its the best evidence. (It was basically James Cameron’s 2012 theory)
All I know is that if the time machine is invented, someone is gonna be disappointed.
ok
ik
@@The_Lost_And_Forgotten2009 can
Well never know what truly happened. Even survivors probably don't know for sure. Either way it was a tragedy. I think what was most aggravating was they didn't have enough life boats for everyone
Can you do some tutorial to do this animation? I once use flipaclip too but i don't really know how to do it since I don't have any kind of animation skills
Maybe
We need to erase all of Aaron1912's theories because it literally makes no sense on how the ship performed a V-break
I actually think the Aaron1912 V break looks better than the first V break. I still can't figure out why it would rip from top to bottom rather than bottom to top ...but ok.
THE ONE PIECE! THE ONE PIECE IS REAL!
sheesh nice vid bro
Thenk yu :>
Fun fact: modern luxury cruise ships DWARF the Titanic-class ships
Is that really big news? And its Olympic-Class
@@Kapitan_Creeper olympic, sorry.
This is so underrated. Good vid man
Thanks :)
Not all theories, but nice job I guess. However an explanation for your theory could be nice, from just looking at an quick animation, it's hard to know what caused everything.
Yes, im planning to do a full explanation of my theory!
Nice
Watch drain the Titanic. Interesting they came to conclusion that it split but stayed connected closer to the bottom and the stern spun like a tornado after separating. They mapped out the debris field & linked them to where they were on ship.
Bright side just stole the thumbnail…
0:53 can everyone please stop giving him attention. i don't want more victims falling into his cult
I mean whats wrong? Everyone is allowed to have opinions!
@@Kapitan_Creeper I agree. there's a difference between having an opinion, and willingly spreading false information that's not based on reality or the laws of physics. Aaron1912 is basically the flat earth society of the Titanic community
@@1Woofer1 We don't talk about Aaron1912, no, no, no, no.
@@vibrantgleam hey it was a Nice Day
@@Infectedwatermeloncat WHA
I like the parks stephenson theory from 2005 because of the kind of split between funnel 2 and funnel 3 (im not saying that your animation is wrong i know i read the pinned comment that its not 100% accurate but its nice keep your animations going!)
Listen to the eyewitness accounts from the survivors and many of them say they saw her go straight up vertically before slipping under the water.
I like James Cameron and yours, but roy mengot version might be accurate.
It doesn't matter how it broke it's in the past it doesn't matter
My theory: the bow floods in a port list 1st funnel falls next 2nd and 3rd then the split takes the 2nd and 3rd then down last funnel grabbed by a davit then falls
ok
wtf was going on with that 2006 v-break split? 0:35
down. no, up! wait, no, down it goes. well...up again. and down. updown.
😂
Phisyks