United States Vs The World (Simulation)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- This video is made for entertainment purposes only and is not meant to be realistic
The day counter alternates every 5 years
INFO:
Programs Used: GIMP, Windows Live Movie Maker, Microsoft Paint,
Frames: 2743
Production Time: 1 Month
Music:
-East Vs West - Allies Battle 1
-Hearts of Iron - Rise my Comrades!
Genocides were allowed, hence, some nations losing millions of people.
1. i think they should have lost guam latter becouse usa has the strongest navy in the world and the other countries navies would take a while to cooperate
2. invasion from north canada just wild
As a mexican, guess ill die
@@ShadowKAnimations ill rather live on somalia than see mexico getting invaded 😩🙏
@@IBerianTeensame
Canada casually losing 95% of their entire population ☠️💀
Imagine how quickly the advanced weapons used to fight this war would run out. Also imagine how the world economy would look after 15 years of war!
I wish I could explain everything normal realistically our reserves in the United States are so deep that we would be able to leverage Our Own oil reserves in a mass production of oil refineries all around the inland US, along with the agricultural industries that we would stop exporting, and then just keep a stock piles in our strategic reserves in the advanced amount of munitions that we would be able to produce along with the manpower so long as we had the water running for at least 40 years, we will be able to have two generations of fighters Increase or 360 million population to over 1 billion easily within 20 to 30 years as long as we get people to want to reproduce and have a certain characteristic of general ideology, the vast amount of control we would have from the Panama Street from the south America the entire control of the both north and south American continents would ultimately sustain a hold specially if the naval power was expanded beyond just smart weapons, the older model ships would probably be employed. Nevertheless, the United States would ultimately be the most strategically advanced nation in all odds. If it were to just be expansionist and warmongering, the entire culture was manipulated that way from the people in the states at the end of the day, the capability to pull together, resources, produce enough weapons, food and water supplies, and advanced weapons to shoot down nuclear missiles. The United States would reign supreme specially with the space force capabilities, perhaps evening to make bases on the moon for a Plan B scenario with earths, became rotten by nuclear waste.
@@Towermidguard uhm...no? the usa would win navally...for a while...it's the entire world my guy...the usa is ahead of the other but by a reasonable margin, it's the resources of EUROAFRASIA against the u.s,the middle east's oil,russia and china's iron, brazil's silicon/iron along with many other resources from africa, the techonological increase would be...absurd, no way the usa can survive for more than 1/2 decades
Bro graduated from HOI4 💀
In all seriousness, it was pretty accurate and I like how it took a decade to get any sort of naval invasion done. All the island hopping though would take so much casualities... In the scenario, it assumes that no one has morals (so doing stuff like genocides against insurgents are ok now) I can kinda see how the casualities add up here... It would have to be decades of repeated destructions on both sides against the central americans...
One thing I dislike about videos like this is that they never count logistics 💀 If logistics were more accounted for then it would be another 20+ years for DC to be taken. You can't just stack up millions of soldiers in Alaska like that.
Read the description, lol
Video’s just a silly project someone made that wasn’t meant to be realistic.
I agree with the logistical part
🤓☝️
@@CountryBaller1796
🤓
-🤡
I disagree with just what you said in the 2nd paragraph
i don’t think anyone in the US is legally allowed to have a video of America Losing lol
I can confirm, I’m on a government watchlist now.
Freedom of speech allows it
definitely not in Russia
Uh, no? The 1st Amendment allows us to speak out against the government
Well its a free country so its definitely alright
We'll finally see what's in Area 51 😃
It’s probably nothing Area 51 is too well known for for them to put anything truly top secret in there
You say no WMDs allowed but those casualty figures beg to differ. Mexico and Canada losing almost 2/3 of their populations, Cuba, Guatemala, and Nicaragua losing almost every single person, Venezuela and Russia about 1/10 of their populations, etc. Even WWII at it's bloodiest wasn't that deadly proportionally speaking. But otherwise, cool video!
Mexico Canada Guatemala and Cuba Nicaragua Colombia Venezuela casualties don’t make sense lol
Russia kinda makes sense
Also what is wmd?
Russia casualties maybe are somewhat possible over that long
@@LeKing_ Ah
@@irenaveksler1935I disagree about Russia's part since even though the United States is a great power we have to remember that it would be alone against the entire planet
It's all fun and games until the American gun owner comes out to play
By the time that became a factor it would already be too late. "The World" would presumably have already set up their battle lines and bought in massive amounts of advanced armour, "minutemen" would be no match and would be slaughtered if they resisted...kind of a more extreme version of what happened in the Soviet Union during WW2 except America would not be fighting on just one front but several fronts at once (hence the already unlikely complete Soviet victory that actually happened would be in effect impossible in the USA in this situation)....it would be a heroic/strong defence but ultimately futile. In any case, Americans have never known something close to foreign invasion, trying to adjust to the idea that America is this weak (in this scenario) in itself might be a huge morale killer.
But the rest of the world has manpower. China and India can alone muster up an army of 100 million soldiers
@@andrewmckenzie292 Sounds like a bunch of ifs. You think the US wouldn't notice massive troops movements near its borders and not send out preemptive strikes? That's also assuming the US doesn't develop any similar weapons or vehicles that you mentioned (which they likely already have developed). People really don't understand just how vast and resource rich the US is. Not to mention its industrial capacity. The world hasn't seen the US actually mobilize for war since WW2. You think the US would become weaker because enemies landed on shore? Boy you really know nothing of Americans. Same logic and mindset the Japanese had when they attacked Pearl Harbor. Then the sun was dropped on them twice.
Except minutemen would be capable of disrupting logistics lines, the one thing an invading force needs most and most world powers don't have a handle on aside from the US. Even western nations aligned with us depend on our military for logistics.@@andrewmckenzie292
@@andrewmckenzie292I don’t think think they ever account for morale much because realistically nobody would want to fight due to casualties and economy. And the economy would be disrupted, plus I don’t think they’d be immune to guns since the war probably wouldn’t last till 2034
Of course while I'm making my scenario, i see another one XD. Very accurate (except casualties). Mexico losing more than the US seems a bit unrealistic, but all in all, a great video.
The super unreasonable and unrealistic part is Canada losing 26,000,000 when it has 39,000,000…..
Cuba and Guatemala losing that much doesn’t make too much sense
WHY WON’T YOU MAKE THE VIDEO YOU SAID “Soon” and it’s been a year and you still haven’t made a single video
@@b.j.likeseverything1906 I feel realistically Mexico would prepare to fight the US Army, in addition to Canada the US Army would not tolerate the cold to the maximum that there is in Canada
personally I don’t think usa would reach Panama before reinforcements came
If this was a library book, I'd put it in the DIY section
loved the blitzkrieg at the beginning
This is surprisingly accurate, since:
- Canada is very expected to be the first or second country to fall, since they are pro-American.
- America attempted to buy Greenland, and they could be the first or second country to fall after Canada by the fact that they don't have regular native army (Denmark does have a base in Greenland but they are just a handful of soldiers) and Denmark (the country also responsible for Greenland's military) might not have a full response to the invasion during the early stages.
- A guerrilla warfare happening in Mexico might be expected too, the cartels and El Chapo made an example in the Mexican Drug War where they built tunnels to hide.
The video may or may not be "surprisingly accurate" but not for these reasons. Canada is no more a "Pro USA" nation than any other NATO member, and canada doesn't have an unreciprocated love for the US, only 59% of canadian men favourably view the USA and only 50% of women, which is rather abysmal for a supposed "pro USA" nation to have just under half of its people dislike them. America's failed purchases almost a century ago shouldn't have an effect on anything. It would take around 46 hours for the USS George Washington to reach the capital of Greenland Nuuk, while the Queen Elizabeth 2 used in the Falklands to carry troops setting off from the UK could arrive in 40 hours at it's top speed, in addition to canadian navy forces being able hold off or slow down US advances the defenders should have ample time to set up defences in preparation for the US. This point makes some sense at least but assumes only mexico would partake in guerrilla warfare but the USA could take all of northern canada with sub zero temperatures and none of the locals or Inuit peoples would become irregular combatants. I may have made some mistakes in calculations and have a bias against the posts glorifying the USA but the points still stand.
Great video, very realistic, except for the casualties, if they were at half they are shown, it would be more accurate.
Why? Because countries now don't allow themselves to have as high casualties as in ww2
Not even a half. More like 1/5 of whats shown 😂
@@Nonamelol. more like 1/10, modern wars are not that deadly
@@Iberian_XAVO Please tell me you’re joking.
@@Iberian_XAVO Yeah, maybe because besides Russia and Ukraine there are no large scale wars right now, even Russia and Ukraine would be considered just another proxy war if this was the cold war. No two superpowers have fought since world War 2, world War 3 would be a blood bath
Because it would be a such a blood bath it would be unlikely to happen, hence why there's no ww3 or deadly modern wars
@@Nonamelol. Look at how many people die in modern wars, small percentages of the overall population. I estimate 3 million people would die in this war, maybe.
Realistically, the USA wouldn't last this long, but excellent video with high quality and an overall entertaining video to watch.
The would probably last longer lmao
@@theremapping3840 nah it's just in films thet USA is very powerful
@@theremapping3840 true
I mean, the U.S. has a lot of natural resources, a strong economy, and a powerful army. Their only issue would be running out of supplies they need in other parts of the world, since, obviously, this is against only the U.S., they wouldn't be able to get them. But, again, they have more than enough strength to keep a decades long war going like this.
@@polskamapping6116 yeah theres another video that's much more accurate. We wouldn't waste military hardware and lives fighting over useless islands. First thing we would do is sieze and destroy all the oil production in the middle east. The US can supply itself. The rest of the world gets 80% of it's oil from the middle east. If the war lasted even close to this long the rest of the world would be out of fuel and the US would still be fine.
I think a nation with 46% of the world's guns and unmatched industrial capacity could hold out for a while before being overwhelmed by the global forces.
Honestly idk if they’d be able to secure canada Mexico and Greenland at the same time that fast but this is a cool concept great video
I am not an american nationlist, but, USA haves the top economy, i think he can keep that zones for some time.
I think Greenland would be quite easy to secure honestly .
@@chromaz4299 it’s mostly I’ve not really
@@chromaz4299 by the Canadians yes, not americans
@@DuckthePolarxd yea but not 3 insanely big places at the same time
My only critique of this video are the goals. I believe the US would want a lot more than just white peace. The same could be said for the world team, like Mexico getting some of its lost territories in the 19th century, etc.
Soulchester upload is one of the best christmas presents
I always see you in comment sections
@@romaniamapping6002 Yeah I see you too!
@@Miskolcz_Mapper haha
How tf did mexixo and canada lose 3/4 of their population
@@pzwang4109 still Canada losing that much doesn’t make sense
I assume because America had to assert a lot of resources on Mexico and Central America because realistically there would be insurrections to a scale higher than the Taliban. I guess also chem, bio, etc. are on the table so I suppose as this is just a hypothetical scenario that the world uses all of it's capabilities regardless of morals (besides china, russia, nk, iran, etc. because they don't have any to begin with)
@@flying0possum many western countries also don't have any to begin with
Depending on the situation usa (or any major power) may not have them either
because the youtuber allowed g3n0c1d3s
to be fair, i think the americans could hold canada and sneak around the mountains of mexico to hold a defensive. some thing else, there is a 128:100 ratio of guns to people
I very much doubt that the Americans know the Mexican territory better than the Mexicans themselves, and in the past Pancho Villa's guerrillas had entered the United States and looted towns. I don't know how Canada would handle it, but I am sure that the campaign in Mexico will be much worse than in Vietnam, it is no longer the same Mexico of the Mexican-American War of the 19th century
I love how the music swells as the contiguous 48 are being invaded.
No country has been able to touch the US in a significant manner like this in all our history, So seeing Texas, California, and the Northern States getting swept over is straight up surreal
Maybe it's the toll of almost 10 continuous years of war. America would be on tatters, short on personnel and materiel.
You see the World forces even made a brief stop at the pre-war American border before invading. A last surrender offer?
I'm confused as to why America didn't continue the offensive. The fact it lost islands here is mind blowing considering no one has the capability to match our navy.
The United States' goal as stated in the video was white peace. This would probably be achievable by applying pressure against them, not just conquer. But obviously, time is not on your side in this scenario.
I’d assume they were more focused on trying to create a defense perimeter around North America from which to hold off the rest of the world.
Because the other countries would be on the defense, while the US navy is strong, i doubt they are capable enough to invade China or Russia.
it lost islands because, while its navy is currently stronger than that of any individual country, it is weake than that of every country combined.
@@amelinadebritobelchior4743 people said that the US navy is in fact stronger than all countries combined. But i doubt that, the US has a lot of carriers, yes, but they're only useful for power projection, all other countries like China and Russia have invested in anti-carrier missiles, so the moment USA gets near to Russia or China their carries will go kaboom, and you might say that carriers can deflect those missiles, but i doubt carriers can deflect nuclear bombs.
Also, literally nothing is stopping the world from coming together and building 400 carriers. The reason countries like China and Russia don't invest into carriers is because they have no interest in projecting power overseas, because they can literally just do that on land.
You should do the U.S, Russia, and China vs the world
probably the Will won if they atacked fast an quickly in taking Asia and after defend untik take África and América europe and Oceanía Will not last
I think that would be a fair fight
Awesome video, great quality.
And these should be done before its late, but with all the potences
Why would America invade Canada and Mexico at the start of the war? That just gives them a massive amount of territory they have to occupy and defend on top of the mainland.
To avoid "The World" having a large land base from which to invade the US, if US can strike hard, large and fast on land initially and turn it into mostly a Naval push near the end the US Navy might come into play which could put up a formidable defence even against the whole world?
Because non-americans or self-loathing americans that hate the US wanted some wet dream to save to a playlist knowing damn well it could never happen even if the world somehow all united against them.
Yep. Huge tactical disadvantage to spread out like that .
@@MarshallFoss1it would be easier to defend that because you wouldn’t have the bigger frontiers with Mexico and Canadian, with that frontier the world could just send a lot of troops and advance into usa
Lol the majority of my state was captured and they tried getting to Chicago
I love how Los Angeles was the only huge city that got captured, rip Hollywood lol. Meanwhile Tennessee and Florida stayed strong the entire time
Overall it's good, but too many pockets, even if it's Germany during WW2, they wouldn't left it's army being encircled without trying to retreat in frist place, morover the soldiers inside the pockets doesn't even bother to breakout
Look at Sinola holding its own.
We do not scare easily!
We neved bow we never bend!
We endor!
We overcome!
We are America!
Second to none!
AND WE, OWN THE FINISH LINE!
You make very good videos. I suggest you keep making them.
Realistically, the US could certainly seize all of Canada, northern Mexico and part of the Caribbean in a few weeks rapid war. The US would next sink into economic stagnation because of its pariah status (like Russia since its invasion of Ukraine) and the war would turn into an indefinite impasse (as the rest of the world cannot get a foothold in North America because of logistics).
A likely outcome to this conflict would be a negotiated peace agreement where the US would be allowed to annex Canada but would have to evacuate occupied territories in Latin America and give up Hawaii and other American territories in the Pacific.
Logistics is the major issue here, I cannot see the entire world being able to standardize all its forces, and work together enough to invade mainland US. The US would take a major hit due to loss of trade, but with access to Canadian national resources, they should be able to somewhat keep up with the world in terms of military powerful, especially factoring the massive technological gap. No country in the world has a better developed military than America. If anything, most militaries in the world would only prove to be a hidnerance, eating up supplies that would have better been spent elsewhere. Though the US being able to expand beyond NA is not that high, and the US being able to expand to the world is impossible. If the world took a quarter of a century, and was miraculously able to stick together through the entirety, then yeah they could win, but realistically, I doubt most nations would be able to sustain a 25 year war economy, without lots and lots of moral loss.
so technically half of canada's and mexico's population got erased
It's a really cool video concept but here are a few inaccuracies:
1) The US would take Iceland (which has no military) and a bunch of tiny islands in order to control the arctic trade routes and military bases.
2) The US would immediately take Costa Rica (which has no military) and Panama (which has almost no military) and Colombia in order to push into Venezuela and take the world's largest oil reserves and actually send troops northwards toward Mexico while having troops push southward into Mexico.
3) The last holdout in Mexico would be the mountain castle surrounding Mexico City and a lot of the big population centers.
4) The US would occupy oil-rich parts of the Middle East and Africa like Angola's exclave of Cabinda.
How USA can handle 10 years ?
This is kinda realistic, USA can only take all of North America and no more without taking too much causalities, so can the world, they can only take some US Territories but cannot take the Mainland without taking so much causalities which is gonna take a long time to wear each other down.
Naur💀
This video is very satisfying
I could get why america lasted so long, it’s the freaking strongest nation
Fun fact: united states was made for make peace on the whole north america, but aint seing peace movements💀
Nicaragua lost like most of its population in this war, Canada too.
I doubt Canada would loose anywhere near 26 million. Thats over half the population, and lets face it, we are the ones going first and we have accepted it.
this is beauiful
Underrated man
Perfect job
Tbf no other country win in a war with every other country.
So good simulation, this probably took so much work.
What was the cause of the USA decline? Doesn't seem very feasible that the USA would expand so far and then suddenly reverse.
You can say the same about Nazi Germany and Japan in WW2,they got very far very fast,but lost in the end because their victories werent of raw outproducing and outmanuevering,but just being too fast for the enemies to react,and at some point,supplying these rapidly gained areas became a nightmare,partially because of a war still being fought,and bombing,rebellions etc,and at this point,wit the combined navies of the world,and the airpower and tank fleets,basic military unit advantages would render the United States undefendable after some extended period of time,example,China ALONE has some 600+million fit for service individuals,much more than the entire population of the United States,also including that in this,the United States has to produce everything it jeeds because it is fighting with all its trade partners,so basically it was a ticking time bomb of a lack of everything after a while,it is a "come as you are" war
@@obamagaming-zv4vy nice reply and all you said is feasible. It's just seems off cause in this the US gained ground across the entire globe. Germany or China never got that far. It just seems that if you actually got that far you would have killed or destroyed the world's fighting pop or it's armaments already. Supplies would be a major tilting point as you point out though. It was an interesting video none the less.
This is conjecture, we would be able to hold off the world for a long time, they might never beat us. We have all the resources we need and if in a real war, we would be building out the armed forces just like everybody else. In WW2, we out built the rest of the world combined, with the exception of USSR armored vehicle production. This time around, we already have a huge head start, due to the Cold War and right to this day we have an armed forces designed to destroy countries, if we so desire. Only other place to get this ability was the Soviet Army.
@@jrus690 no healthcare?
Everyone would have sent troops at that point
bro nearly all of mexico and canada died ( population wise )
Merry Christmas to you all!
Can you do an alternate history ww3?
Happy new year
merry christmas
Could you do a scenario of The United States of America VS the rest of the Americas
I think in a scenario where the US went against all countries of the world (obviously I doubt would happen), I think this video is near accurate to how long the US would last against all countries of the planet.
The US trying to take control of Canada and Greenland while fighting Mexico makes sense, since the US would easily dominate any country in a normal 1v1 when it comes to a naval or airborne battle.
Another thing that makes sense is how the US tried to regain control of the Pacific Islands since China is another strong powerhouse in the world. However, Russia and China alone would overwhelm the US military, but since all countries declared war on the US, the US lost many of its soldiers at this point and couldn't withstand the entire world.
I can’t believe how Canada suffered so fast
Fake, the USA didn’t fight 7 entire alien races to win the war and flex on them haters.
(Joke)
Merry christmas!
Can you do an alternate history ww3?
Can we talk about the fact that Canada lost almost its entire population
Us would get killed in like a year lol. good video tho
Not really. Although global sanctions would be catastrophic, the United States is quite self-sufficient.
@@nicholass.brisco2213nope, allmost all US bases will be conquered by the host country pretty much easily. This can alone cripple USA's ability to fight a global and be forced to switch on defensive
Global sanctions would be catastrophic...for everyone else. The US economy is so massive and intertwined with global trade that any sanctions on us would cause only relatively minor problems, and only for a short time as we possess most of the resources we need already, and a conquered south America would give us the rest. Meanwhile, every other country except north Korea would flat out no longer have an economy at all. Nowhere in the world has the economic power to counteract the loss of America from global trade. Period.
Proves how powerful American is to potentially conquer a whole continent in a year.
1:49 6/26/24 this is the day when i'm in that day
No way usa can be defeated cuzmof the lack of military transport of the rest of the world
This, what are they gana do swim across the Atlantic and pacific?
@@goobot1the rest of the world has a far bigger navy, usa would have to leave their ships near the coast to try to protect them, o think the war would last 1 or 2 years until usa falls
@@PanzerkampfwagenVITigerIAusfE bigger in numbers not tonnage, a tiny boat isn’t making the trip across the pacific and even if it makes it it will have few people or weapons and will be sunk in an instant
@@goobot1 im pretty sure it’s also bigger in tonnage lol, usa would have to be defensive to live longer
@@PanzerkampfwagenVITigerIAusfE I think the us would play some variant of defense yes, but mainly cause they can hit any target across the whole planet easily
Good video but I think you need to have a small fight between Canada and USA.... I think they would be equals up north where the Canadians have the home advantage.
I’m sorry, I have nothing against Canada, however it was pretty accurate. Considering we have no reason to fight plus the small Canadian army and Population which is close to the border… sorry man.
@@trevorreese3510 I dunno, I think the Canadians would have a better chance of holding off the invading Americans towards the far north due to much closer supply lines and the harsh weather making it difficult for the US to send troops and heavy equipment in large numbers.
I think it would end up like the winter war
IMO.
@@adhip0574 Even with shorter supply lines the Canadians cannot hold such a frontline because of the gaps in their lines. The Americans could just straight up walk around the Canadian divisions.
@@trevorreese3510 Vietnam
@@adhip0574 That’s an entirely different scenario where America wasn’t able to send enough troops to make a difference because otherwise the Chinese and Russians would’ve gotten involved. Not to mention that was decades ago, modern warfare doesn’t work like that.
My way:
Ottawa is taken, but Canada is preparing to reconquer it.
USA tries to push through Siberia, but it went poorly. Russia occupies some of Alaska's coast.
Mexico sent navies, but didn't excpect an airforce bombing.
The secret "Operation Louisiana" went suceeded, southern Louisiana is now occupied.
Ottawa is reconquered, USA still tries to take it back. Alaska now borders Washington.
Louisiana is taken back, Baja California surrenders.
Chinese and japanese boats annex San Francisco.
Alaska surrenders, and it's divided between Canada and Mexico.
Florida surrenders due to naval invasion.
Navies from Brazil and Guianas bring down South Carolina.
Indonesia and Philippines sends all their navals and fight for the Californias.
USA surrenders. The new capital is New York City.
Is it a app or just an Animation?
China vs the world, next?
if you want to put 10 counties as a world, at least put the 10 strongest military countries..
R.I.P American simulation 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
The Pentagon has run a similar scenario, including research from think tanks and simulations. It expects, with nuclear weapons and destabilization allowed, that the United States could hold the world off to a stalemate.
nah
@@Sicilyballproductions if they land an army on the continent we’re probably screwed, but the object of the simulation was to prevent a landing, after annexing everything from Greenland to the Darien gap. Realistically we would lose in an attrition war, but in the short term we have all of the advantages.
@@Sicilyballproductions Yes. The majority of the powers that would be attacking the US heavily rely on US military logistics and support to do anything. Not to mention the US exports the most amount of food in the world. The US could literally just wait and starve everyone out while they throw bodies at us. Good luck keeping your supply lines open.
@@jdk4914eithout nuclear the world would conquer usa in probably 3 years
Average Hearts of Iron IV game
You could’ve used Ages Of Conflict…… and made the rest of the world allies and fight the USA…
How about you do France vs The World.
Will WW1 come out soon?
I don't understand what the US was supposed be doing between 21 and 24. Dissembling it's army?
It was probably a stalemate on the fronts or preparing forces, maybe something like during the Battle of Britain during WWII except over the Pacific, Arctic, and past the Panama Canal.
Pretty good stuff
American painter🎨👨🎨🖌️
Where Do I Find This Map
Good👍
the gdp of the world is 200 trillion (when excluding the us) and the us is just 24 trillion. The us is like a third world country when we do it like that.
no it's not, the worlds gdp excluding the us is around 70 trillion not 200 trillion
@@aydenhudson1026 Wrong, the worlds is actually 180 Trillion but I rounded it. Its still almost a bit more than a third of the worlds gdp.
@@NotePortal I'm not wrong, look it up, excluding the united states from the worlds gdp is around 70 trillion
You act as if you can fight a war with dollar bills, India was richer than the uk yet they got swiftly conquered.
The US ($25T) makes up a quarter of the world's GDP ($100T). You are incorrect. The world has more to lose economically than the US does if this conflict ever happens. Also keeping in mind the US keeps finding new deposits of needed resources like lithium, cobalt, copper, etc. And guess what, they're the leading producers of a lot of those resources as well as being the largest exporter of food.
I hate that 40% of the comments and most of the replies on this video are some stupid af takes
👍👍👍
In all fairness the world world have a very hard time it's un unified and no has the logistical support that the us does in 2 days the us military can be anywhere in the world not to mention the continental us is literally a fortress we have 2 oceans as a mote and enough resources to supply all off Europe and ourselves for 20 years also the united states has the most heavily armed population in the world even if you got past are military which is the largest and most advanced in the world you would then have to deal with it's citizens which considers about 300 million people in the US own guns you better believe no one could easily beat us
Very professional video
India having 20 million loses- Joke of the decade
Anyways grt vdo
India is no where close to USA in military capability. All they can do is stay defensive
Cuba losing 90% of its population 💀
What does White Peace mean as the goal?
It means a peace in which nothing changes. Essentially just ending the war and everyone goes home like it never happened.
Game name?
Astronomically high losses, why is that if weapons of mass destruction weren't used?
Imagine a world war that last 15 years with the technology we have
Maybe the US committed war crimes against civilians like Germany at ww2
The oil war has begun
wtf happened to canada ☠️☠️☠️
Fought the US
cap
canada lost more than 50% of the population-
Mexico is the spviet union of this war
I disagree, no one would ever atttack across the narrow piece of land that is Panama it needs less troop garrisons from the defender in proportion to the attacker since it’s like a tunnel. American logistics is supreme and island capturing campaigns in the Aleutian Islands would be costly and meaningless besides the importance of long range missiles.
America would analyze all possible, possible, suitable, and good landing spots that are advantageous for the attacker and make it a disadvantage by garrisoning it. An invasion across the Atlantic from Bermuda would cross thousands of nautical miles and would be impossible without wiping out the American defenders the fact that naval invasions are so hard and that the united states happen to start with the world's finest arms manufacturers and best logistics in the history of any kind and being the safest from invasion ever just makes landfall in America impossible.
I agree. The US military has contingencies for literally any scenario imaginable, including those against current allies should they ever become hostile overnight.
Can i have you're simulator please
Attomic bomb?
Canada got f**king deleted lmao
Se nota que no sabe geografia de México y canada parece que canada esta solo por estar ya que cae casi de inmediato y mexico igual a pesar de su terreno montañoso que si o si haria que america tuviera que esperar minimo 4 años para tomar mexico
Almost all of Canada’s population is in Toronto and Quebec which is surrounded by the us in 3 directions. After that falls what’s left of Canada to fight back? Grizzly bears? Mexico I kinda agree with, the north would be a quick capture but after that it would be a bit of a fight
@@goobot1 bueno en lo de que después de que tomen el norte México estaría indefenso estoy de acuerdo pero si tardaría un buen rato
4:25
3:35 what music?
th-cam.com/video/Pv0dso2bPoA/w-d-xo.html this is
@@aureolqx good
interesting scenario
Yeah in no scenario would the US win this, I'm from the United States, I've studied lost of conflicts and world affairs, it's not a simple "We're the strongest so that must mean we can take on the whole world" The us heavily relies on the outside world for shipping, even large companies such as Nintendo, Volkswagen, and most school supplies are made from other countries, if for any reason the world declared war on the US, every country would have to hate the US, decreasing the US economy. Second the US wouldn't issue a first strike unless it's a last resort as a nuclear war would be as catastrophic for the US as it would be for the world, nuclear bombs don't follow borders, even if almost no nukes hit the US at all, nuclear winter and radiation from the wind would cripple the US agriculture, a large famine would ensue, the US doesn't "win" as no scenario where the world goes catastrophic is a win for any country. Second, we do not have the largest population or largest standing army, at some point, quantity can beat quality, if the entire world came together to defeat one country, I'm pretty sure the world was preparing for thus conflict just as much as the US. Imagine every non amerocan scientist working together under a unifying cause. You can see how under no circumstances there is a win for anyone as this would all in nuclear annihilation.
I don't feel like typing this comment 1000000 times to 10000 people who don't get it.
The winner is...nobody
The end
Wrong. This war game is based on a no WMD premise as nukes and the like too obviously negate the purpose of such an experiment.
In the event of a global conventional war of the US vs everyone, we would win. We possess the means and resources to gain full self sufficiency with months in such a scenario. Besides which, any damage to our economy due to denial of foreign trade would result in similar or worse economic damage to those nations. The US is not utterly dependent on any one foreign nation for anything except maybe the anime market lmao. In contrast, most foreign nations that trade with us would experience economic collapse immediately without our economy to buy their stuff. Furthermore, a significant majority of the world is dependent on US aid, military support, and/or investment. Including almost all of Europe.
The reality is that a us vs the world conventional war would result in a us victory almost immediately as everyone else would just collapse. The few that wouldn't, would have no means of striking us across the seas and any attempt to build up such forces would be destroyed immediately by our overwhelming headstart and technological advantages at sea and in the air.
Kindly don't comment when you don't even understand the basic STATED premise of the simulation.
Oh no we can’t buy cheap pencils erasers while the rest of the world can’t buy our food and use our satellites and internet
The world would literally starve without US trade. All the US would have to do would be to wait it out and let the world fall apart either literally or figuratively regarding the "alliance". A lot of liberties are taken against the US in this video.
murica
Excuse me what the FUCK THIS NATION IS POWERFUL THEN EVERYONE