Volatility: GARCH 1,1 (FRM T2-23)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
  • [my xls is here trtl.bz/2t794bU] The GARCH(1,1) volatility estimate shares a similarity to EWMA volatility: both assign greater (lesser) weight to recent (distant) returns. But the GARCH(1,1) has an additional feature: it models a long-run (aka, unconditional) variance toward which the volatility series is pulled. Discuss this video here in our forum: trtl.bz/2YMnNWZ
    Subscribe here www.youtube.co...
    to be notified of future tutorials on expert finance and data science, including the Financial Risk Manager (FRM), the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA), and R Programming!
    If you have questions or want to discuss this video further, please visit our support forum (which has over 50,000 members) located at bionicturtle.co...
    You can also register as a member of our site (for free!) at www.bionicturt...
    Our email contact is support@bionicturtle.com (I can also be personally reached at davidh@bionicturtle.com)
    For other videos in our Financial Risk Manager (FRM) series, visit these playlists:
    Texas Instruments BA II+ Calculator
    • Texas Instruments BA I...
    Risk Foundations (FRM Topic 1)
    • Risk Foundations (FRM ...
    Quantitative Analysis (FRM Topic 2)
    • Quantitative Analysis ...
    Financial Markets and Products: Intro to Derivatives (FRM Topic 3, Hull Ch 1-7)
    • Financial Markets and ...
    Financial Markets and Products: Option Trading Strategies (FRM Topic 3, Hull Ch 10-12)
    • Financial Markets and ...
    FM&P: Intro to Derivatives: Exotic options (FRM Topic 3)
    • FM&P: Intro to Derivat...
    Valuation and Risk Models (FRM Topic 4)
    • Valuation and RIsk Mod...
    Coming Soon ....
    Market Risk (FRM Topic 5)
    Credit Risk (FRM Topic 6)
    Operational Risk (FRM Topic 7)
    Investment Risk (FRM Topic 8)
    Current Issues (FRM Topic 9)
    For videos in our Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) series, visit these playlists:
    Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Level 1 Volume 1
    • Level 1 Chartered Fina...
    #bionicturtle #risk #financialriskmanager #FRM #finance #expertfinance
    Our videos carefully comply with U.S. copyright law which we take seriously. Any third-party images used in this video honor their specific license agreements. We occasionally purchase images with our account under a royalty-free license at 123rf.com (see www.123rf.com/... we also use free and purchased images from our account at canva.com (see about.canva.co.... In particular, the new thumbnails are generated in canva.com. Please contact support@bionicturtle.com or davidh@bionicturtle.com if you have any questions, issues or concerns.

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @hai.1820
    @hai.1820 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After seeing the second video on this topic, I started to get a light grasp! THank you so much for clearly explaining this!

  • @finansalmodeller3468
    @finansalmodeller3468 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Super clear! Thanks a lot admin

  • @bartas8891
    @bartas8891 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks David ! good explanation as always.

  • @samrathore9396
    @samrathore9396 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb, as usual

  • @bluehorseshoe444
    @bluehorseshoe444 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are the formulas in the 'D' column inconsistent? In the 'D9' cell, you divide current day by the previous day, but in all subsequent cells, you divide previous by current

  • @fffabiofigueiredo
    @fffabiofigueiredo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Its possible to share this spreadsheet? I dont understand what isthe 0.880348% means... its the cel S73 and isnt possible to see... Thank you!

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      A link to the spreadsheet is found in the description, at the beginning; ie, the XLS is at trtl.bz/2JQufJy . I calculated 0.880348% by applying the "tedious" GARCH(1,1) on the previous day, σ^2(n-1). Thanks!

  • @m.r.5855
    @m.r.5855 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thx for the great explanation. There seems to be a typo in the xls. It seems only the first relative (cell D9) is correct - the others are calculated as S(i-i)/Si.

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, you are totally correct ... such that the prior returns are negatives of those shown (e.g., -1.63% rather than 1.63%). Although because the first is correct, and the squared-returns are identical, it turns out to have no impact on the rest of the results! But you are still totally correct, great observation ...

  • @abenaokromea
    @abenaokromea 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video. Thank you!

  • @AkshatPande92
    @AkshatPande92 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please throw more light on the Long Run Variance. Will it be given directly to us on the FRM exam?

    • @haminajafi224
      @haminajafi224 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's my question too.

  • @LinhNguyen-ih1zl
    @LinhNguyen-ih1zl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can I use GARCH (1,1) for portfolio returns, or GARCH (1,1) just applicable for a single security returns?

  • @noname_whatsoever
    @noname_whatsoever 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing again. Thanks!

  • @devonk298
    @devonk298 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great!

  • @clarence5965
    @clarence5965 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question might be kind of dumb, how did you obtain the volatility for the day prior at 12:35

    • @clarence5965
      @clarence5965 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      nvm i watched the the how to calculate historical vol video.

    • @felipegirardi4379
      @felipegirardi4379 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have the same question

  • @BettyDavenport-k3w
    @BettyDavenport-k3w 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    O'Keefe Squares

  • @SphereofTime
    @SphereofTime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:34

  • @joaquimazevedo3679
    @joaquimazevedo3679 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How can I calculate the long run variance?

    • @akibnizamify
      @akibnizamify 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please someone answer

    • @jrfabian
      @jrfabian 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akibnizamify Using eviews i think

  • @NobukoPasquarelli-q9q
    @NobukoPasquarelli-q9q 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gusikowski Lock