No, this dont help. You had a negative bias against the pistol before you purchased it. Makes zero sense. Also, i have been shooting 1911 pistols all my life and you certainly dont have to spend thousands of dollars on one to have an excellent side arm. I have run Springfield 1911 that was pure junk. I have also run a Colt that had to be sent back to them 2 times before it functioned half way decent. Any pistol brand can have their short comings and believe me they do. 50 thousand rounds? Get real. After that many rounds Any pistol will need and should have maintenance done. You hate aluminum frames? I guess you consider Sig Sauer pistols junk then? I will put my $900 P226 pistol up against any 1911 custom pistol you have that you squandered "thousands" for. Tisas pistols seem to be well made and well priced guns. There are other brands that offer the same. Let the pistol determine its quality by how it functions. A gun isn't judged by it being overpriced its judged by how reliable it is in a emergency situation. I know pistols. I have shot hundreds. Many upon many lower priced brands function flawlessly and i would choose those over big name brands in a second. Again, 50 thousand rounds to be reliable? Get real. Any gun would need service after that many rounds... barrel, springs...extractors...etc would need an overhaul. 😂
Thank you very much, I always respect people with knowledge and experience, your comment was well worth reading and rereading. You're absolutely right, I just wanted to hear someone say it. A gun is judged on how it functions and if it's reliable when you need it. Spot on, any mechanical device or machine can have failures, you just maintain it properly.
Well done, good post up. Only own 1 Tisas and its in 45 ACP. Solid color commentary and mag decision. For me... these make fun competition or range day purpose vs true CCW or night stand. Tisas is making a SOLID product for the price and I find it hard to critique based on price to quality vs purpose in tool kit.
I've got a Bantam carry, it's basically the same gun with a fancy slide and Fiber Optic front sight. It's been perfect through about 400 rounds of various 115 RN. But it will jam HP's and TRN's into the feed ramp about 5% of the time, but as the round count increases it is getting better. The slide to frame fit was super tight out of the box, with ~700 rounds through it the fit has loosened to just tight. It's a lot of fun to shoot and I think the bobtail makes it more comfortable in the hand. Comparing the Tisas mags to two new Wilson ETM mags, both are good with round nose but the Wilson mags are definitely better with HP's and truncated round nose ammo.
I have two Tisas .45 ACP 1911s, a Raider and a Service Special. They're both excellent guns with the biggest difference being the sights. Both feed anything and shoot anything and are more accurate than I am and I'm not a bad shot by any means. Both SHOULD cost a lot more than they do, thanks to the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Turkish lira. Overall the Raider is my favorite of my four 1911s. It just feels RIGHT and I shoot better with it than any other gun. I'll have more Tisas pistols, I'm sure. Looking forward to the release of a 2011 in .45 ACP.
wtf is with all the comments saying he's trash-talking inexpensive guns? He said it's a good gun, just not to his tastes. Geeze.... I thought it was nice to see an honest review with some actual round count, not the usual "look how awesome this is, never mind I only put 4 or 5 mags through it" stuff that I see too much of. I just ordered a Stingray, this review was part of what made me feel comfortable taking a chance on this particular "budget brand." As far as quality of cheap vs. expensive guns, I don't own any expensive 1911's but the trigger on my Colt is better than my RIA (in spite of the Colt being series 80) and the fit and finish of the RIA isn't close to as nice as the Colt.
Well, he did say that all of his other 1911's cost > $1,000 more and that this one had a cheap barrel and fitting simply based on the price. He also talked about his expensive Springfield and how reliable it is. Why would he mention the price and reliability if not to infer that inexpensive 1911's tend to be unreliable. While I do have some middle of the road priced 1911's, my inexpensive RIA and Para commander and full size 1911's have been 100% from the start.
It did help. My anxiety at least. I have one on Lay-A-Way. I've wanted to try a 1911 for a Loongg time. This was my choice .Wish me luck RockOn.StayFree.
I just picked up one of these on a whim on sale, haven’t had a chance to shoot it yet, but it looks good, and feels good in my hand, fit and finish looks good, should be a good little shooter.
Bought the 9mil today! Boy oh boy. I shot it with bare sights, and it CRUSHED my G48 with laser optics. Where the site sat, the bullet went. Simple. IDK WHERE some of my bullets go woth the G48 sometimes.
If you had painful arthritis in both hands, would you keep that 9mm vs 45? You didn't seem to knock it for anything serious. If it was a 5" would you keep it then?
The only true hate I have for it was the ambi safety edges. 9mm would make a pretty big difference if I had arthritis in my hands and wrists. I will say that I’ve broken a finger on each hand recently, but still prefer the .45. Not the same thing I get it, but I can still expect more reliability and accuracy out of the box on a cost effective .45 vs the same in 9mm. I also don’t care for aluminum frame guns. But again, it’s personal preference… and I put a boatload of rounds through any gun I’m carrying.
my rock island basic 1911 in 9mm has probably 1000 or 1500 rounds through it with no failures. i dont think 1911 9mms are unreliable; in fact in film they use 9mm 1911s (or they use to before cgi was big) because the 9mm blanks were more reliable than the .45s
So many on utub say ambidextrious. You don't pronounce any "I" in the last syllable. Just bugs me. It is ambidextrous. I have the Stingray, did some mods, and it is really good, not Cabot good, but good enough to enjoy.
Yeah. They didn’t work well at all when the plunger spring was weak. Haven’t tried them since I replaced it. I can same they’ll work fine since that particular malfunction was cured by replacing the spring.
I mentioned the bobtail, because it was the first gun I owned that had it. I don’t care for it after shooting it more. The swell of my hand fits into the bobtailed portion and I prefer the typical straight or slight curve mainspring housings. I tried it, and see zero concealment improvement with the bobtail. Some folks like it. I do not. Doesn’t mean I’m better than them, just my preference.
Dude where the hell have you been at? U must not have heard of the 1911 in 9mm made in Turkey like this Tiasa or the Metro arms 1911s made in the Philippines called the American classic that run. For well under a 1000 bucks
I mean… I’m aware those pistols exist. But I’m not sure where this train of thought is coming from. In my experience and that of others… 9mm 1911s exist, but for superior reliability and accuracy, you tend to have to spend more on the barrel to bushing interface and other areas to gain the accuracy that is inherent in the .45. I’ve shot several 9mm 1911s that cost $1500 that should have been priced at $300.
Ok… so in other words, you only talk good about expensive guns. Since you like to price drop all of your weapons, then clearly you have a grudge against cheap guns. But not all of us think the more money you drop equals the better firearm. I love my expensive Custom Sig but I also like The dirt cheap guns. Like the Taurus G2C. I’ve owned 1911s that were $2k+ but also some that were $500, they all shot just fine. You’re not a very good gun critic. Js. I bet you’re a Glock Fanboy as well 😂😂
Love my 9mm Stingray.
Great shooter and no issues.
No, this dont help. You had a negative bias against the pistol before you purchased it. Makes zero sense. Also, i have been shooting 1911 pistols all my life and you certainly dont have to spend thousands of dollars on one to have an excellent side arm. I have run Springfield 1911 that was pure junk. I have also run a Colt that had to be sent back to them 2 times before it functioned half way decent. Any pistol brand can have their short comings and believe me they do. 50 thousand rounds? Get real. After that many rounds Any pistol will need and should have maintenance done. You hate aluminum frames? I guess you consider Sig Sauer pistols junk then? I will put my $900 P226 pistol up against any 1911 custom pistol you have that you squandered "thousands" for. Tisas pistols seem to be well made and well priced guns. There are other brands that offer the same. Let the pistol determine its quality by how it functions. A gun isn't judged by it being overpriced its judged by how reliable it is in a emergency situation. I know pistols. I have shot hundreds. Many upon many lower priced brands function flawlessly and i would choose those over big name brands in a second. Again, 50 thousand rounds to be reliable? Get real. Any gun would need service after that many rounds... barrel, springs...extractors...etc would need an overhaul. 😂
Thank you very much, I always respect people with knowledge and experience, your comment was well worth reading and rereading. You're absolutely right, I just wanted to hear someone say it. A gun is judged on how it functions and if it's reliable when you need it. Spot on, any mechanical device or machine can have failures, you just maintain it properly.
I have the Tisas Stingray in 45acp and it runs the magazines that come with it perfectly fine
Well done, good post up. Only own 1 Tisas and its in 45 ACP. Solid color commentary and mag decision. For me... these make fun competition or range day purpose vs true CCW or night stand. Tisas is making a SOLID product for the price and I find it hard to critique based on price to quality vs purpose in tool kit.
I traded for a Tisas Stingray. Can’t wait to shoot it, plus get to stay in 9 mm and don’t have to worry about expensive .45 acp.
I've got a Bantam carry, it's basically the same gun with a fancy slide and Fiber Optic front sight. It's been perfect through about 400 rounds of various 115 RN. But it will jam HP's and TRN's into the feed ramp about 5% of the time, but as the round count increases it is getting better. The slide to frame fit was super tight out of the box, with ~700 rounds through it the fit has loosened to just tight. It's a lot of fun to shoot and I think the bobtail makes it more comfortable in the hand.
Comparing the Tisas mags to two new Wilson ETM mags, both are good with round nose but the Wilson mags are definitely better with HP's and truncated round nose ammo.
50,000 rounds? Cmon bro that’s just stupid
I have two Tisas .45 ACP 1911s, a Raider and a Service Special. They're both excellent guns with the biggest difference being the sights. Both feed anything and shoot anything and are more accurate than I am and I'm not a bad shot by any means. Both SHOULD cost a lot more than they do, thanks to the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Turkish lira. Overall the Raider is my favorite of my four 1911s. It just feels RIGHT and I shoot better with it than any other gun.
I'll have more Tisas pistols, I'm sure. Looking forward to the release of a 2011 in .45 ACP.
wtf is with all the comments saying he's trash-talking inexpensive guns? He said it's a good gun, just not to his tastes. Geeze.... I thought it was nice to see an honest review with some actual round count, not the usual "look how awesome this is, never mind I only put 4 or 5 mags through it" stuff that I see too much of. I just ordered a Stingray, this review was part of what made me feel comfortable taking a chance on this particular "budget brand." As far as quality of cheap vs. expensive guns, I don't own any expensive 1911's but the trigger on my Colt is better than my RIA (in spite of the Colt being series 80) and the fit and finish of the RIA isn't close to as nice as the Colt.
Well, he did say that all of his other 1911's cost > $1,000 more and that this one had a cheap barrel and fitting simply based on the price. He also talked about his expensive Springfield and how reliable it is. Why would he mention the price and reliability if not to infer that inexpensive 1911's tend to be unreliable. While I do have some middle of the road priced 1911's, my inexpensive RIA and Para commander and full size 1911's have been 100% from the start.
It did help. My anxiety at least. I have one on Lay-A-Way. I've wanted to try a 1911 for a Loongg time. This was my choice .Wish me luck
RockOn.StayFree.
I just picked up one of these on a whim on sale, haven’t had a chance to shoot it yet, but it looks good, and feels good in my hand, fit and finish looks good, should be a good little shooter.
Let me know if it seems reliable!@@humpy936
You say what you need to aay. I like 1911's so much, I'm a sucker for tisas 1911's.
Bought the 9mil today!
Boy oh boy. I shot it with bare sights, and it CRUSHED my G48 with laser optics.
Where the site sat, the bullet went. Simple. IDK WHERE some of my bullets go woth the G48 sometimes.
Did you serve in the arm forces
I’ve got no cool guy background, myself. Just been training as an instructor with tier 1 operators for about 15ish years.
If you had painful arthritis in both hands, would you keep that 9mm vs 45?
You didn't seem to knock it for anything serious. If it was a 5" would you keep it then?
The only true hate I have for it was the ambi safety edges.
9mm would make a pretty big difference if I had arthritis in my hands and wrists. I will say that I’ve broken a finger on each hand recently, but still prefer the .45. Not the same thing I get it, but I can still expect more reliability and accuracy out of the box on a cost effective .45 vs the same in 9mm.
I also don’t care for aluminum frame guns. But again, it’s personal preference… and I put a boatload of rounds through any gun I’m carrying.
my rock island basic 1911 in 9mm has probably 1000 or 1500 rounds through it with no failures. i dont think 1911 9mms are unreliable; in fact in film they use 9mm 1911s (or they use to before cgi was big) because the 9mm blanks were more reliable than the .45s
So many on utub say ambidextrious. You don't pronounce any "I" in the last syllable. Just bugs me. It is ambidextrous. I have the Stingray, did some mods, and it is really good, not Cabot good, but good enough to enjoy.
Do you still have it? And is it for sale?
Nope.
It went to a buddy of mine.
Did you put any 10 round mags in it?
Yeah. They didn’t work well at all when the plunger spring was weak. Haven’t tried them since I replaced it. I can same they’ll work fine since that particular malfunction was cured by replacing the spring.
MecGar mags...they make for alot of good companies...
I really really want one but I live in california 😢
Dude why would you mention the Bobtail? that Is the reason why it's for CONCEALED CARRY so it doesn't print vs your 5in 1911.
I mentioned the bobtail, because it was the first gun I owned that had it.
I don’t care for it after shooting it more. The swell of my hand fits into the bobtailed portion and I prefer the typical straight or slight curve mainspring housings. I tried it, and see zero concealment improvement with the bobtail. Some folks like it. I do not. Doesn’t mean I’m better than them, just my preference.
@@TexasDefenseArticulationsIt's an ED brown frame!!
I thought Tisas shipped with Mecgars.
@@kalliste23 they maybe one in the same. I’ve known them as ACT mags for quite a few years.
Just the mere fact that people feel the need to say how reliable their 1911 is tells me it isn't.
Right!
Dude where the hell have you been at? U must not have heard of the 1911 in 9mm made in Turkey like this Tiasa or the Metro arms 1911s made in the Philippines called the American classic that run. For well under a 1000 bucks
I mean… I’m aware those pistols exist. But I’m not sure where this train of thought is coming from. In my experience and that of others… 9mm 1911s exist, but for superior reliability and accuracy, you tend to have to spend more on the barrel to bushing interface and other areas to gain the accuracy that is inherent in the .45. I’ve shot several 9mm 1911s that cost $1500 that should have been priced at $300.
I fit a undersized bushing to the slide and barrel on every 1911 I've owned my springers colts and tisas.
It is better than my kimber and Colt.
What can be said. A man wearing a USA flag holding a pistol, built an enemy of that flag.
Bro wanted a reason to pay 2k for a 1911 lol
Ok… so in other words, you only talk good about expensive guns. Since you like to price drop all of your weapons, then clearly you have a grudge against cheap guns. But not all of us think the more money you drop equals the better firearm. I love my expensive Custom Sig but I also like The dirt cheap guns. Like the Taurus G2C. I’ve owned 1911s that were $2k+ but also some that were $500, they all shot just fine.
You’re not a very good gun critic. Js. I bet you’re a Glock Fanboy as well 😂😂