Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz: Fed rate hikes didn't get at source of inflation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 เม.ย. 2024
  • Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize-winning economist, Columbia University professor and ‘The Road to Freedom: Economics and the Good Society’ author, joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the state of the economy, the Fed's inflation fight, and more.

ความคิดเห็น • 532

  • @Powerz00
    @Powerz00 หลายเดือนก่อน +550

    is it really worth investing in stocks in 2024, I’ve been on the sidelines watching the market for awhile and it seems to be pretty stagnant to me not that it matters because I’m in it for the long run, but how can one generate actual profit in this current market?

    • @WestonScally7614
      @WestonScally7614 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It may be a good idea to speak with a financial advisor who can help you develop a portfolio based on your individual goals and risk tolerance.

    • @SaintYvess
      @SaintYvess หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Partnering with a financial advisor has transformed my approach to investing. Their expertise and personalized guidance have not only helped me navigate complex financial markets but also optimized my portfolio to achieve my long-term goals efficiently.

    • @EthanMaloney-qp4lh
      @EthanMaloney-qp4lh หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Your advisor seems competent. Could you share how I can reach out to them? I've recently sold some property and am interested in investing in stocks, and I'm seeking guidance.

    • @SaintYvess
      @SaintYvess หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      *Jennifer Leigh Hickman* is the licensed advisor I use. Just search the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

    • @Christine-wp2bw
      @Christine-wp2bw หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow, her track record looks really good from what I found online. I'll take a chance and see how it goes. Thanks for the info

  • @kortyEdna825
    @kortyEdna825 หลายเดือนก่อน +378

    With rates climbing like never before in ’23 coupled with uncontrollable inflation, and our own mortgage at now 7.5% what are the best alternatives/strategies for avoiding a crunch and maximize my $600k savings other than moving in to an RV with my two kids and wife.

    • @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io
      @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are not alone we can no longer afford our mortgage, husband wants us to travel or relocate/I am proposing cashing in, walking away and renting while putting the rest in the stock market.

    • @carssimplified2195
      @carssimplified2195 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In my opinion, home prices will need to fall by at least 40% before the market normalizes. If you do not know whether to buy a house or not, it is best you seek guidance from a well-experienced advisor for proper portfolio allocation. So far, that’s how I’ve stayed afloat over 5 years now, amassing nearly $1m in return on investments

    • @brucemichelle5689.
      @brucemichelle5689. หลายเดือนก่อน

      Impressive can you share more info?

    • @carssimplified2195
      @carssimplified2195 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Certainly, there are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’COLLEEN ROSE MCCAFFERY” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive.She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @brucemichelle5689.
      @brucemichelle5689. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.

  • @DennisJack-km8ho
    @DennisJack-km8ho 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +417

    It's sad how difficult things have become in the present generation. I was wondering how to utilise some money I had. I used some of it for e-commerce business, but that sank. I'm thinking of how to protect my $300K stock portfolio from decline is my main concern, but I don't really know which way to go.

    • @CrystalJoy-32
      @CrystalJoy-32 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Yeah, things may be hard right now, but I've come to realize both bear and bull market, recessions and economic boom, all provide opportunities to make high gains, I used to call bluff on folks that bragged about making a fortune from such down-markets until I happened to do so myself

    • @Sampson-jh7yq
      @Sampson-jh7yq 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I agree. I've been working with a financial advisor since 2020, and I return up to 15k every month, and I don't even have to lift a finger. Although I also think the reason I make this much is because I started with significant capital.

    • @alicegomez7232
      @alicegomez7232 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      That makes a lot of sense. To be on the safer side and not second guess your market decisions, I’d suggest you reach out to a proper investment adviser for guidance, they’re better equipped at understanding market patterns/movements and adjusting portfolio to match up with these market trends

    • @Sampson-jh7yq
      @Sampson-jh7yq 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Monica Shawn Marti is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

    • @RuthEvelyn-rc3bg
      @RuthEvelyn-rc3bg 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I really appreciate your useful advice. I was able to set up a call with her and confirm her identity. She seems incredibly knowledgeable, and I appreciate your advice so much.

  • @brianwhitehawker1756
    @brianwhitehawker1756 หลายเดือนก่อน +429

    I was advised to diversify my portfolio among several assets such as stocks and bonds since this can protect my portfolio for retirement of about $150k. I want to know: Do I keep contributing to my portfolio in these unstable markets, or do I look into alternative sectors?

    • @lucaswilliams9992
      @lucaswilliams9992 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the strategies are quite rigorous for the regular-Joe. As a matter of fact, they are mostly successfully carried out by pros who have had a great deal of skillset/knowledge to pull such trades off.

    • @yeslahykcim
      @yeslahykcim หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even with the right strategies and appropriate assets, investment returns can differ among investors. Recognizing the vital role of experience in investment success is crucial. Personally, I understood this significance and sought guidance from a market analyst, significantly growing my account to nearly a million. Strategically withdrawing profits just before the market correction, I'm now seizing buying opportunities once again.

    • @Jadechurch-ql3do
      @Jadechurch-ql3do หลายเดือนก่อน

      impressive gains! how can I get your advisor please, if you dont mind me asking? I could really use a help as of now

    • @yeslahykcim
      @yeslahykcim หลายเดือนก่อน

      Laila artine kassardjian' is the licensed coach I use. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

    • @BrettaANordsiek
      @BrettaANordsiek หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for this Pointer. It was easy to find your handler, She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her.

  • @victoriaabott
    @victoriaabott หลายเดือนก่อน +288

    When you spend like drunken sailors like Congress does, you have baked in inflation. this concerns me and has left me uneasy. Especially this potential depression, no more a recession. I'm unsure about my $130K account strategy, considering the uncertainty of this whole recession mostly.

    • @Kaustavpatell
      @Kaustavpatell หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you lack knowledge about market investing tactics, get advice from a financial counselor.

    • @MickyGlover
      @MickyGlover หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed! this is why I work with one. My $520k portfolio is well-matched for every market season yielding 85% rise from early last year to date. I and my advsor are working on more figures for this year. IMO, financial advisors are the most sought-after professionals after doctors.

    • @kurtKking
      @kurtKking หลายเดือนก่อน

      I could really use the expertise of this advsors.

    • @MickyGlover
      @MickyGlover หลายเดือนก่อน

      Her name is 'Michele Katherine Singh’. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

    • @kurtKking
      @kurtKking หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up after scrolling a bit. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her. Once again many thanks

  • @jamesgraham5470
    @jamesgraham5470 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Stiglitz just says what the politicians want to hear please no more Keynesian ideology

    • @chintandobariya472
      @chintandobariya472 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What else is solution 😅

    • @cat143143
      @cat143143 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chintandobariya472 real economics aka. Austrian Economics. Reinstitution of the Gold Standard.

  • @mysticaltyger2009
    @mysticaltyger2009 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    He says "We're not Argentina". That's a really low bar.

    • @jz94117
      @jz94117 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At least, we're not Haiti.

    • @heberpelagio7161
      @heberpelagio7161 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@jz94117, Venezuela is actually worse than Haiti!

  • @jamessimmer725
    @jamessimmer725 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Would they give Stiglitz another Nobel Prize if he read and understood Milton Friedman enough to at least give an honorable mention to the Fed buying $4.8 TRILLION of Federal Bonds (with printed money) between February 2020 and April 2022. This inflation is persisting long after the Covid supply problems ended.

    • @Anthony-dy5cq
      @Anthony-dy5cq หลายเดือนก่อน

      Milton Friedman was a charlatan and anyone who sources him as an expert should be written off as being knowledgeable.

  • @EverlyndPerez
    @EverlyndPerez หลายเดือนก่อน +263

    Investors are skeptical about the Fed's plan to maintain interest rates until inflation stabilizes. Personally, I'm uncertain about investing $150k into my stock portfolio and seek advice on the best strategy to capitalize on this current market.

    • @Debbie.Burton
      @Debbie.Burton หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Investing in stocks can be a wise decision, especially if you have a reliable trading system that can lead you to fruitful days of success.

    • @benitabussell5053
      @benitabussell5053 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's really challenging to have a stable portfolio right now, so I always preach about the importance of having an advisor.This helped me stay afloat and improve my portfolio 0f $450k by 48% in just 3 months.They have strategies that are specifically suited to your long-term objectives and financial aspirations.

    • @HarrisRyan-oy8eo
      @HarrisRyan-oy8eo หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Opting for an inves-tment advisr is currently the optimal approach for navigating the stock market, particularly for those nearing retirement. I've been consulting with a coach for a while, and my portfolio has surged by 85% since 2022

    • @judynewsom1902
      @judynewsom1902 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who is the coach that provides guidance for you? I urgently require assistance; my stock portfolio is stagnating, and I need investment advice for retirement.

    • @HarrisRyan-oy8eo
      @HarrisRyan-oy8eo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      *Sharon Lynne Hart* is the licensed advisor I use. Just search the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

  • @grc7231
    @grc7231 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    Word: Never accept economic advice from some dude who has his own personal chef, and is clueless about the price of beef, milk, eggs, bread, etc.

    • @carlgemlich1657
      @carlgemlich1657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seriously?

    • @Astralthelionheart
      @Astralthelionheart 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So Joe Kernan then?

    • @elvispresley3234
      @elvispresley3234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes

    • @erichvonmolder9310
      @erichvonmolder9310 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You mean Trump too?

    • @wchristian2000
      @wchristian2000 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Alright I’ll take financial advice from the homeless guy down the street then. Thanks for the tip

  • @joshrunge2238
    @joshrunge2238 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Does printing 6 TRILLION DOLLARS IN 15 DAYS have anything to do with it 🤔

    • @dltn42
      @dltn42 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The current US government reminds me about the last Argentine president that said "printing money was not the cause of inflation" 😂
      Bros missed economics classes 😂

    • @tanpham7411
      @tanpham7411 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Of course not! Its not in the scripts that he was supposed to say.

    • @graciasthanks4771
      @graciasthanks4771 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem is that if you actually list the truth of the problems caused by excessive government spending you don´t win awards like the Nobel prize, don´t get the good grants from the goverment, become a pariah in an ecochamber of economists who rubberstamp globalist policies, loose the respect of the IMF and the World Bank, etc. Very few leading economists are brave enough to tell the complete truth.

    • @derekdipietro2588
      @derekdipietro2588 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You remove that money from the economy in two ways. 1. Taxes, 2. Interest Rates. We can't raise taxes on the people who took all of the money so we have to make them pay through borrowing, unforunately that hurts everyone

    • @tktimber418
      @tktimber418 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is not $6 trillion and 15 days.
      It is about $6 billion each each and every day.
      I agree with your sentiments.
      You are so off-base that it gives no credibility to your statements. Ignorant people like you need to keep their mouth shut.

  • @lesterchua2677
    @lesterchua2677 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    “Everything but money printing was the source of inflation.”
    Good time to be a money printer.

    • @Anthony-dy5cq
      @Anthony-dy5cq หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yup, sounds about right. War and supply shock part not the "money printing" part anyone and everyone who explains that as being the source of inflation possess a frail understanding of economics.

    • @Death_to_the_state
      @Death_to_the_state หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Anthony-dy5cq Oh, so tell me something smartass: You mean ignoring the laws of supply and demand make you better at understanding economics? Do you even KNOW how money supply (M) works and how it affects the economy? I don't think so.

  • @romanswan1000
    @romanswan1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Dude we need a rate at least 7,5% to be fair.... inflation much more then 2.8%...

    • @Carlos-im3hn
      @Carlos-im3hn หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      or even 20% to truely break the inflation...but not clear about recent $2T/yr deficits and $1T/yr interest payments with ~ $35T debt ! and huge unfunded liabilities and bad demographics.

    • @zazzleman
      @zazzleman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We need interest rates to be close to 10% if anyone will ever be able to retire and live off the interest of their savings instead of depleting the capital.

  • @hobarttobor686
    @hobarttobor686 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    Inflation was caused by shortages? This proves the Nobel Prize is a joke.

    • @Garybroker54
      @Garybroker54 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      nothing to do with printing money?? Sure does! Guy is a dud IMO.....

    • @danielmcpartlin6526
      @danielmcpartlin6526 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      He won a Nobel prize in lying and deception….. plus a few sprinkles of woke

    • @moneyglitchjon
      @moneyglitchjon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Stiglitz is 😂hilarious

    • @breadloaf2163
      @breadloaf2163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I bet you were alright with the whole world being closed for two years.

    • @carlgemlich1657
      @carlgemlich1657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Where can I buy your book, or are you still writing it in your mom's basement.

  • @sampellettieri5823
    @sampellettieri5823 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It’s incredible who they give Nobel prizes to. State politically motivated and sponsored economists

    • @fahey5719
      @fahey5719 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no Nobel prize for economists
      Nobel despised them. It is a fake prize issued by a bank.

  • @frankscott1708
    @frankscott1708 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Once again, there is no Nobel prize in Economics. There is a prize set up in 1969 by a bank in memory of Alfred Nobel. Basically they are trading on the name and status of the Nobel Prizes.

    • @VesaVuorinen
      @VesaVuorinen หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent point!
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences

    • @wfk3rd
      @wfk3rd หลายเดือนก่อน

      And his lack of knowledge proves he’s not worthy of any prize.

  • @charlesporter2191
    @charlesporter2191 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I don't care if he had 20 Nobels I disagree with his analysis

  • @emcalone
    @emcalone 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Inflation had nothing to do with money supply. This guy is a genius.

    • @elvispresley3234
      @elvispresley3234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is an idiot.

    • @joanblond8527
      @joanblond8527 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Most of the time inflation is caused by irresponsible expansion of the money supply. This time, the supply chain problem may well have been a factor; but M2 expansion also played a heavy role.

    • @mingdianli7802
      @mingdianli7802 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's a Democrat. What do you expect him to say?

  • @bobslate7231
    @bobslate7231 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Dude housing prices went up because prime was zero from 2008 to 2022. Should have been that low that long.

    • @elvispresley3234
      @elvispresley3234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bang on Bob.

    • @AR-rn8ok
      @AR-rn8ok 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Not really just rates. No one was building homes for like 4 years from 2008 to 2012. We never built enough supply. And banks were not giving many people loans for a long time either.

    • @jonfreeman9682
      @jonfreeman9682 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He's comparing to Argentina. That's rather extreme. The era of free money drove everything up.

    • @mysticaltyger2009
      @mysticaltyger2009 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I think you meant "should NOT have".

    • @wfk3rd
      @wfk3rd หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AR-rn8okPlenty of supply it was all bought up by investment firms which should be barred from owning single family dwellings.

  • @gybob100
    @gybob100 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Exactly, irresponsible government spending is the source

    • @jackiebang4717
      @jackiebang4717 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Irresponsible tax system. The government spends a lot to promote businesses. Well, there is no income from the corporate side after that.

    • @rjbernard72
      @rjbernard72 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​microbe_rz31irresponsible govt spending. Like funding both sides to 2 wars and student loan bailouts.

    • @elvispresley3234
      @elvispresley3234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, and that coupled with the Fed keeping rates too low too long and creating an ungodly amount of cheap credit. Idiots.

    • @Dr.Weed8
      @Dr.Weed8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      they need to discontinue all food stamps and social welfare programs. This is affecting demand at the grocery store. That’s why raising rates isn’t working.
      Look at what gold was signaling.

    • @LoveLife-oo9cz
      @LoveLife-oo9cz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Only irresponsible if the government wants to help students loans right lmao. Nothing to do with billions of PPP forgiveness, stimuluses, rents freeze and rents are skyrocket now.

  • @anonsurf6640
    @anonsurf6640 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Let the man finish his sentence. Jeez.

    • @Dave-bz4pb
      @Dave-bz4pb หลายเดือนก่อน

      For real!

  • @davidh7799
    @davidh7799 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Government overspending is inflationary. 1 trillion dollars being added to the debt every 100 days is insane. Federal expenditures are in overdrive, and are a threat to the country's financial system.

  • @zwatwashdc
    @zwatwashdc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The world bank has done such an excellent job over the last 70 years. Wow, they have been right about everything. Africa is so modern now. The mind blowing genius blows my mind.

  • @sbar39
    @sbar39 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Sending helicopter money 💰💰 not an issue?

  • @johnnyirving1274
    @johnnyirving1274 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Professor at Columbia? Immediate skepticism

    • @titusp9488
      @titusp9488 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      what do you do for a living? where did you go to school (college)?

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@titusp9488 You have to be a really great academic to appeal to authority this hard. I can tell you one thing, this guy said there would be no inflation or only low mid-term 3-5% inflation when they gov. spent another 2.2 trillion on top of all the PPP and "rescue plan" spending. And he was completely wrong, obviously, and that's why we're here. So you can continue listening to "nobel laureates" but anyone who isn't gullible has seen that prize is nothing more than a publicity generator for leftists. Why don't you call up the dozens of Arab countries plunged into devastating civil wars and lecture them about Obama's peace prize.

    • @fr3847
      @fr3847 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      he's a legend bro trust he is as good as it gets for an academic in economics

    • @jonfreeman9682
      @jonfreeman9682 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's renowned. But he's not really making sense.

    • @gm-zz8so
      @gm-zz8so หลายเดือนก่อน

      Columbia University Nobel Prize winning Phony BS ....we now see the results of Columbia and the police are rounding them up. I wouldn't give 2 cents for this phony advice or his book.

  • @vicentecouto4977
    @vicentecouto4977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    These people are so out of touch with reality. I guess lowering rates to historically low and giving everyone money didn't matter.

  • @ISpitHotFiyaa
    @ISpitHotFiyaa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Stiglitz is a clown. That's the same BS you hear from Biden. But if supply shocks from the pandemic were the cause of the inflation then prices would have gone back to normal once those supply constraints were resolved. It's like when a hurricane disrupts the supply chain and drives up prices - those prices don't stay high forever. The supply chain gets restored and prices go back to normal. Also, people moving around the country is a zero sum game. That would create higher prices in the places they're moving to and lower prices in the places they're moving from. The net effect on inflation would be zero. No, the real cause of the inflation is the Fed itself and the excessive spending coming out of the Biden administration.

    • @carlgemlich1657
      @carlgemlich1657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @microbe_rz31 Stiglitz is an economist. The Nobel Peace Prize is a separate category.

  • @lakeguy65616
    @lakeguy65616 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I'm surprised Prof. Stiglitz would say that interest rates are too high. The neutral rate is defined as the rate of interest where the economy neither expands nor contracts. The economy is continuing to expand, which would indicate that the current Fed Funds Rate is below the neutral rate.

    • @elvispresley3234
      @elvispresley3234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, and I'd add that the rate is too low when compared to the money supply in circulation and latent in the current gov spending as well as reverse repo and treasuries. There's just too money money in the system..look at the deficit. That is a debt to government (i.e. us taxpayer) and on the other side of the equation it is spent into other peoples pockets who keep spending as well.

    • @Brian.Murphy
      @Brian.Murphy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@elvispresley3234 exactly. I share your sentiment word for word. Finally, someone who GETS IT!

    • @AR-rn8ok
      @AR-rn8ok 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are lagging indicators that imply we may have overtightened. There’s a reason most economists don’t tighten this much this fast.

    • @lakeguy65616
      @lakeguy65616 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AR-rn8ok GDP continues to expand

    • @Felix-op1rw
      @Felix-op1rw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      but interest rates have a time lag. Gdp is cooling down right now. I think i read that most economist right now are expecting the neutral rate to besomewhere between 2.25-3%

  • @lockejr
    @lockejr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The source of inflation is scammers. They’re printing money.😂😂😂😂

  • @spaceoddity2485
    @spaceoddity2485 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Compound inflation of USA over last four years is 25%. Outrageous!!!! Wealth destruction

  • @georgemaximus694
    @georgemaximus694 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I wonder who is going to buy his books

  • @iang1429
    @iang1429 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Didn’t even mention the amount of money printed 😂

  • @nickvin7447
    @nickvin7447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    All you have to do is turn off government spending, unemployment will rise, and all prices on everything will drop.
    It is that simple.

    • @joanblond8527
      @joanblond8527 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      People don't want to accept that kind of pain. Democracy promotes easy money!

    • @Carlos-im3hn
      @Carlos-im3hn หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joanblond8527 Congress and the Fed promotes easy money. Strong backbones are lacking in DC.

    • @youtuby014
      @youtuby014 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Psycho commenters

  • @jeffthomas7345
    @jeffthomas7345 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So the government printing trillions of dollars had nothing to do with inflation???

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      China printed more, yet they had deflation.

  • @mikek.9980
    @mikek.9980 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I wasn't nominated for a Noble prize but know that money printing fix nothing!!

  • @sirandoost
    @sirandoost 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Who gave this guy a nobel?! Jesus Christ…

    • @AH-fm7rj
      @AH-fm7rj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂

    • @breadloaf2163
      @breadloaf2163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell us what's wrong.

    • @carlgemlich1657
      @carlgemlich1657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, it wasn't Jesus. Stiglitz is a Keynesian economist, as are the most of the best ones.

    • @williamstoker8027
      @williamstoker8027 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Liberals

    • @titusp9488
      @titusp9488 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      where is your nobel prize? ... JC

  • @chrisperkins3026
    @chrisperkins3026 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    He wrote a book of the same name in an effort to erase the prior publication.
    Nothing to see here 🖕

  • @williamstoker8027
    @williamstoker8027 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Not a word about government free money? A Democrat? What a joke

    • @martinguila
      @martinguila 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its insane to have lock downs and print money like crazy and say there wont be inflation, "its transitory"

    • @kangkim150
      @kangkim150 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No one talks about it because both Trump and Biden did it. But Biden also doesn't get credit from either party for cutting the M2 money supply by $1 trillion, that's very interesting.

    • @bongobrandy6297
      @bongobrandy6297 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember who it was that insisted on actually signing those checks? Probably not. Hint: he's on trial for multiple felonies, as we speak.

  • @lirmchip
    @lirmchip หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All these experts have all the answers if only they knew the questions,

  • @christiancoronado
    @christiancoronado 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    People like him are the reason we had inflation not seemed in 40 years and $34T national debt

    • @carlgemlich1657
      @carlgemlich1657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, don't think so.

    • @christiancoronado
      @christiancoronado 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @carlgemlich1657 well we disagree, what do u do for a living?

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@carlgemlich1657 He was one of the 17 nobel laureates who signed a letter saying there would be no major inflation and even if we did see 3 to 5% inflation for a short time it would be worth it to rebuild infrastructure. Well, here we are trillions of dollars later with almost nothing built and so far devaluation of wages and savings is about 15% on paper compared to when he signed the letter in 2021.
      In reality it's worse because anyone who doesn't own a house can't afford one, anyone who does own one is paying 40% higher property taxes in return for nothing.

    • @carlgemlich1657
      @carlgemlich1657 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @gorkyd7912 I'm sure you and I have more in common than with the Nobel laureates. The reality is they're the ones listened to on monetary policy. The opposition wants to blow everything up, so to me, that's not a solution. The oligarchs will still be in control, as they always are.

  • @cb9125
    @cb9125 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Supply shortage. 😂😂
    Nothing to do with printing too many dollars.....

  • @nabeelsheikh212
    @nabeelsheikh212 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What is the current problem being caused by rates being too high. He gives no examples and just states they should be lower.

    • @yehmustafa2959
      @yehmustafa2959 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      7% mortgage rates. High mortgage rate is also locking up housing supply, which inflates housing costs and consequently rental costs. 10% auto loan rates. Expensive housing and auto in turn causes high insurance premiums.

    • @nabeelsheikh212
      @nabeelsheikh212 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yehmustafa2959 but lowering rates would further increase demand so maybe any increase in supply would be dwarfed. Alot of this is theoretical since most economists thought these high rates would have caused a recession but economy is booming.

  • @cheninblanc8208
    @cheninblanc8208 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stiglitz is correct stating that the FED overplayed their hand......

  • @dyingbatroad
    @dyingbatroad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have to respectfully disagree. If work from home caused people to move, and that caused prices to increase in those localities where they were moved, why didn't we see a corresponding decrease in housing prices in the places they left? Instead we saw every housing market skyrocket, even those where people were leaving. It's easy to see it was the monetary and fiscal stimulus. The Ukraine war and global supply chains have nothing to do with the supply of existing homes, but the Fed buying 1/3 of all home mortgages for QE and the resulting sub 3% mortgage rates does. And then it was the complete U-turn in interest rate policy, with mortgages above 7% causing a lockdown effect. Even if new home construction slowed during the pandemic, the new home supply in any given year is not nearly as large a factor a the supply and demeand existing homes.

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nobel prize in bs'ing does not deserve the respect you're giving.

    • @wfk3rd
      @wfk3rd หลายเดือนก่อน

      No need to respect a charlatan.

  • @videomonster9778
    @videomonster9778 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2% was the guardrail... Inflation is theft.

  • @lirmchip
    @lirmchip หลายเดือนก่อน

    Two time Nobel Prize winner, he's really good at telling us what we already know, brilliant!

  • @MyTommyN
    @MyTommyN หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Monetization of the debt is distorting the economy.

  • @jesselivermore2291
    @jesselivermore2291 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    interest rates dont stop inflation, money supply does, argentina has interest rates of 180% their inflation went up every year, stop the credit supply stop debt monetization.

  • @user-lr5po4pl6s
    @user-lr5po4pl6s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Government actions have created economic inequality!

  • @Theyloveshnwr
    @Theyloveshnwr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    If they cut rates while inflation is at 3% it will spark inflation extremely high again

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At some point the rate is secondary to the debt figure. Inflation is highly based on perception and you can't maintain the perception of solvency when you're spending 2T more than revenues every year.

    • @jonfreeman9682
      @jonfreeman9682 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Inflation is too high as is. But way better than Argentina.

    • @LoveLife-oo9cz
      @LoveLife-oo9cz หลายเดือนก่อน

      The truth is billionaires haul all the money. That is disturbing to the core. 1 billion dollars = 1000 millions. And some even has 200,000 millions but they get greedier than ever. No amount of money can satisfy their greedy cores. They are the ones causing inflation, of course the government prints money too.
      Then we have the complainers, aka retires, collecting social benefits and expect the young to work their butts off while hating on immigrants. The sad truth is the so called immigrants are the ones willing to work for peasants. Society is going downhill. People aren't grateful and become so entitled and inconvenient to people around them. So inconsiderate.

  • @Falconlibrary
    @Falconlibrary 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Almost 100% of the increase in housing prices over the last 15 years has been caused not by shortages but by near-zero interest rates.
    Stiglitz has won the Nobel Prize twice but is disconnected from reality if he thinks inflation is the official rate. It's in double digits and many people who were struggling before inflation are now drowning.

    • @fhowland
      @fhowland 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah I'm not impressed. He doesnt think inflation is a problem? Obviously he lives in a bubble.

    • @mountainmike-zd2jk
      @mountainmike-zd2jk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've rented homes for over 15 years and my rents didn't change much until interest rates skyrocketed.
      My loans where around 300 a month and with rate increase my payments almost doubled.
      So obviously I can't rent a property for 550 a month anymore and had to increase rents.
      Equity loans and real-estate rentals usually carry an adjustable interest.
      It's not the same as a primary home.
      After doing this for almost 20 years I've never seen anything like it in my career.
      Economy is really in bad shape when people can't afford housing.

    • @LoveLife-oo9cz
      @LoveLife-oo9cz หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is not the one who is suffering. I bet he has the cooks and doesn't know the costs in grocery stores. There was so much money during the pandemic. If money is reached easily to anyone, then it causes inflation. It's always supply and demand.

  • @douglasdeyton
    @douglasdeyton หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    a Nobel prize winner whose argument is based on theory rather than the facts experienced by working class Americans.

  • @qake2021
    @qake2021 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We 🇺🇲 are in for a lot of problems !✌️

  • @Ahmad-ml9gj
    @Ahmad-ml9gj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2% inflation rate goal was the dumbest thing

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Should be 0%. How much should you steal from wage earners and savers? None.

  • @Carlos-im3hn
    @Carlos-im3hn หลายเดือนก่อน

    Need rates near 20% to break the inflation back.
    However with $2T/yr deficits and $1T/yr debt payments we are in going in the wrong direction to survive this mess the Fed and US Treasury made.

  • @chrisforza3659
    @chrisforza3659 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No, it was the printing of nearly 30% of all dollars in circulation over the course of one year. Inflation only exists when you add more money to the system... That's it. Price goes up and down based on supply and demand but inflation only exists when you add more dollars into the system.

    • @tomushy
      @tomushy หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have no idea how wrong you are and it's appalling to read so many self-assured comments like your's here from equally clueless people.
      "inflation only exists when you add more [money]* into the system" I just need one example when this is not the case and you're already wrong, so here it comes:
      OPEC decides to pump less oil, oil prices start to rise, you don't get the equal amount of oil for one dollar, badaboom: inflation without the FED or the government doing anything at all.
      (*there are other currencies in the world you nitwit.)

  • @edwardadams7408
    @edwardadams7408 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The problem is American greed. Suppliers wholesalers retailers The Federal government Green new deal,war on the oil industry increase the price on everything.

  • @rdw1968
    @rdw1968 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rates are still too low.

  • @FixUp.LookSharp
    @FixUp.LookSharp หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He's so wrong. It seems by now after 4 years I know more about macroeconomics that the good professor here

  • @shammuk02
    @shammuk02 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would rather have a recession than Hyper inflation

  • @jayshankarchandran321
    @jayshankarchandran321 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The key important source is free printing of the money by Fed.

  • @lawrencefeldman462
    @lawrencefeldman462 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Supply and demand...!

  • @MyTommyN
    @MyTommyN หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I disagree with the professor on the freedom of inflation flexibility in that repressive interest rates at the Fed for nearly two decades served t o price American labor out of the global marketplace, and pushed capital out of the USA.

    • @MyTommyN
      @MyTommyN หลายเดือนก่อน

      One need only look at burned out flyover America to see the results

  • @DCZ94
    @DCZ94 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love at the end, they had to cut him off before he started actually speaking

  • @rcox54321
    @rcox54321 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything has changed since COVID stressed the system and highlighted some flaws, such as infrastructure and the supply chain. It seems like there is another problem that has been exposed, but has yet to be identified, which is the current model for measuring the health of the economy is flawed. Why do working people have to lose their jobs, remember good jobs reports show a healthy economy, the stock market is up so business is healthy, but the FED has the rates hiked up because of inflation and it’s not working, it’s making things worse. This guy is right on the money. A 2% target for inflation is too low. We had no problem for years with 3-3 1/2%. Why such a low target now?

  • @832elf
    @832elf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Inflation is caused by M2 money supply, it inflates hard assets.

  • @maxthemagition
    @maxthemagition หลายเดือนก่อน

    A huge mistake was made since the financial crash of 2008 in that money was printed and given to the banks at zero percent interest rates, in reality free money for the banks to spend as they wished.
    This increased borrowing as well as inflating asset prices and the Market indexes.
    Many people got stinking rich and the World debt massively increased.
    It was a case of printing money and paper IOUs which increased the debt mountains and inflated assets like property and shares by a substantial amount.
    The result is a mountain of debt that must be serviced globally.
    Mortgages and car loans increased.
    Those left behind and those starting with nothing are suffering as a result, the younger generation especially who have to suffer inflation, huge rents and high property costs.
    The rich got richer and the poor got poorer.

  • @fatimailao1529
    @fatimailao1529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Everybody is always talking about cutting interest rates and high inflation. If americans dont want inflafion federal reaerve shpuld stop printing the dollar. Too much dollarhave been printed and is still being printed. If the dollar is notthe world currency reserve, usa would have been experiencing hyper inflation long ago. Chinaalone has 3.4trillion dollars as reserve.
    Usa has 34trillion debt and it wil print more than 90bi.lion to give toukraine taiwan and israel. Dollar is just printed money that is why many nations are calling for dedollarization. They haveto tax theirpeople while all usa has to dois to print the dollar

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The fed doesn't print directly, it adjusts base rate and banks print the money by lending. When you get a $400k loan for a house that's all "printed" money that was generated from fraction in reserve. So the rate is one way to reduce money supply.

  • @HoneyLove77
    @HoneyLove77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    INFLATION CAME FROM SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION AND GOVERNMENT MONEY!! AND WE SHOULD HAD RAISED IT ABOVE INFLATION AND CRUSHED INFLATION

  • @fhowland
    @fhowland 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Anyone know where Andrew gets his shirts? They always look great.

    • @Tuxiii808
      @Tuxiii808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Stenströms

    • @jdwyer5708
      @jdwyer5708 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're going far in this spiritual existence..

  • @JoseSanchez-jp5ft
    @JoseSanchez-jp5ft หลายเดือนก่อน

    The FUD (fear uncertainty doubt)on icp is ramping up lately...seems like a signal to load up more icp because the fus us designed to suppress price until the big buyers fill their bags first.

  • @bongdallion3435
    @bongdallion3435 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    AI? Green movement? None of that is happening

  • @DavesGuitarPlanet
    @DavesGuitarPlanet 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the mainstream media demonstrating what's wrong with the mainstream media. Trying to make something snappy and exciting instead of the slow, measured discussion of serious issues.

  • @user-wr4yl7tx3w
    @user-wr4yl7tx3w หลายเดือนก่อน

    so larry summers was wrong?

  • @channelsold3236
    @channelsold3236 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BORING!!!
    dear j pow: raise the interest rate to double digits !! 10.0% now!!
    that will sky rocket 🚀
    silver : $150.00 (per ounce)
    gold : $10k (per ounce)
    bitcoin well over a million $$$
    💯 💸 💰 🤑

    • @user-bt9cm7ze4c
      @user-bt9cm7ze4c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL, if i could get 10 pct in a CD i'd be parking cash in the bank not buying gold

  • @joesmith-gf9lg
    @joesmith-gf9lg หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trump for Pres and this guy for the Fed Chairman and the world,including the USA, will be a much better place.

  • @pjcanseco2590
    @pjcanseco2590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice, let's cut a couple of quarter percent chunks off of the Fed Funds rate, then. Sounds good to me.

  • @adampowell2144
    @adampowell2144 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What he left out is that the inflation is caused by a lack of investment in the real economy. Things are breaking down and costs have to go up to fix things.

  • @emptyempty1310
    @emptyempty1310 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cuts coming! Pamp it

  • @philmarsh7723
    @philmarsh7723 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think that the right number for inflation long-term is a mean of zero.

  • @sglaser001
    @sglaser001 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, is this guy saying that the cost of capital should be negative? Oh, he is a Keynesian philosopher, which is not actual economics. Supply side shortages cause inflation, but actually reduce back to original prices. People buying houses don’t cause inflation. $4T of money printing is the cause and he doesn’t mention it. We have had 15 years of savers getting negative rates and subsidizing others. This is nonsense. Savers should get 15 years where they get to make some real returns.

  • @EducationistK
    @EducationistK หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jerome Powell is a tax specialist not an economist with practical sense of what is prevailing on the road. He did not travel the country like Alan Greenspan. Powell did not understand that economics is science .

  • @agentcontrast9784
    @agentcontrast9784 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    issue is there are too many variables at play for anyone to predict what to do..expected results don't always happen..just like the market..the economy makes a fool of most people who try to predict most of the time..fed should not change their stance now.

  • @Brian.Murphy
    @Brian.Murphy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Of course he has a new book out - why else would he be on CNBC except to shill his book?
    Raising interest rates is secondary. If the Fed really wanted to fight inflation, they would have been more aggressive about reducing the balance sheet primarily. History has shown that when the balance sheet is greater than about 16% of GDP (currently $4-$5 Trillion), interest rate policy isn't as effective...so why are we all surprised that the Fed raises interest rates to 5% and they have only marginal impact on slowing the economy (and secondarily inflation)? Data shows that's what would happen.
    Either the Federal Reserve, with all its Phds, are a bunch of idiots, or they decided against aggressive balance sheet reduction to benefit the banking system. Now we're in an inflationary rebound and they're again surprised. WTF?
    So now, Stiglitz gets on TV to argue that interest rates are too high and "everybody realizes that we don't have out of control inflation"...these people are all too stupid to believe. Seriously, he's arguing for a little bit higher inflation target...what a clown. I wish all these old people would just get out of the way already!

  • @Lloyd-George66
    @Lloyd-George66 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interest rate won't make a difference on inflation though higher interest rate will lower banking responsibilities then a noticeable difference at cost per good will better purchase sale purchase goods. Then inflation can be addressed and potentially bettered.

  • @kludgedude
    @kludgedude หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interest rates are prices

  • @philmarsh7723
    @philmarsh7723 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Supply side. Antiglobalism, trade wars, anti immigration. The sources of inflation are stupid politics. The Fed shouldn't be expected to fix that.

  • @chrischoir3594
    @chrischoir3594 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    so what he says is high rates didn't work to lower inflation so lower rates?? c

  • @user-sx3jd5hu4i
    @user-sx3jd5hu4i หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tell the Nobel Prize scholar it's not hard for wages to fall; When people are out of work and need money, they take any work they can get! Our government's policies and practices will make that happen! We don't need Nobel Prize scholars to explain that to us. Anybody with Common Sense can figure that out on their own! Incidentally, Thomas Paine wrote something called "Common Sense 200+ year ag0. Perhaps, It should be required reading before our politicians take office!

  • @paulreynolds2569
    @paulreynolds2569 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does this man not want to acknowledge that A LOT of fiat money was created during the pandemic and that we shrank our economic output during the lockdown and BOTH of these factors gave us the price increases we experienced? Meanwhile, the higher interest rates we now have won't do much to bring down inflation because slowing the economy or even putting it in recession will, once again, shrink output. Plus, like all savers in money market funds, I have all this extra money(higher interest) I can spend or continue to inflate asset bubbles with.The treasury will not cut spending because rates are higher. They'll simply refinance at the higher rates. How much room is there really for cutting spending down to a level that balances the budget?

  • @ricinro
    @ricinro 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The supply chain component of inflation was clear to see. Gas prices shot up because refineries had issues and production was kept low. However, there was a lot of cash given to the public. Corporate gouging of the public did not produce the social revulsion it deserved as people were distracted by blaming this politician or that. Stop buying stuff, eat at home, live modestly and prices will return to normal and if they don't then you will do better comparatively than the fool who pays too much and kicks the dog.

  • @teckmenglee8060
    @teckmenglee8060 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Source of inflation is the PRINTING AND CREATION of SO MUCH USD.

  • @wubanga10154
    @wubanga10154 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is he wrong about interest rates though? You shouldn't be able to borrow capital at 0% rates except in times of dire need for economic expansion, which the world's largest economy hardly qualifies for.

  • @MrR40388
    @MrR40388 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So out of touch. Should be zero inflation. Less government spending,no money manipulation. The key to the 90s was low spending and low debt. The government and the financial sector are the 2 biggest parisites in the economy.

  • @Janderson200
    @Janderson200 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stiglitz, the same guy who backed Venezuela’s economic policies when Chavez was in power, wouldn’t trust him even with a lemonade stand

  • @stackchn
    @stackchn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    7% mortgages, 10% car loans, credit cards all-time high average 22%., Macys just jacked up its card to 34.49% .High prices, high rates is a toxic mix for the working class, retirees!

    • @lawlkings
      @lawlkings 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Credit Cards always had high interest rates. Always pay off your credit card balance in full every month and you don’t pay interest.
      If you can’t pay off your credit card in full every month, then that simply means you’re spending more than what you can pay.

    • @stackchn
      @stackchn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lawlkings If it were that easy all Americans would be skinny and rich, but instead a majority are fat and broke

    • @Alpharizzchad
      @Alpharizzchad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome to 1980s you want Cheese with that Wine

    • @LoveLife-oo9cz
      @LoveLife-oo9cz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only irresponsible people pay interests on credit cards. I use thousands of $$ on credit card and don't pay a dime on any interest.

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LoveLife-oo9cz Or people who use credit cards for emergency expenses, obviously.

  • @user-fb6hy2eh5y
    @user-fb6hy2eh5y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOL. Really! Interest rates and layoffs don't address price gouging and record margins. Supply shortages is an excuse to permanently increase prices.

    • @gorkyd7912
      @gorkyd7912 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There was an extremely short period of time right after the massive PPP, rescue plan, and other bailouts where companies had record profits obviously because inflation had not yet caught up with actual liquidity. Now companies are back in the red or shutting down entirely except for a few massive monopolies.

  • @chrissertich6197
    @chrissertich6197 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you know who should win the Nobel prize? The person that invented knock knock jokes!

  • @wayne4768
    @wayne4768 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The nobel prize has become a complete joke

  • @utahagentz
    @utahagentz หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everybody worried about inflation so much that nobody talks about the juggernaut national debt. The national debt is like a planet killing asteroid. It will hit.