I was a navigator on Lincolns with 61 squadron at Waddington, Eastleigh Nairobi, and Wittering, and later with 83 squadron at Hemswell.before joining the V Force Valiants at Marham. I am 90 years old now, and joined the RAF in 1950 as a cadet navigator.
I just watched this with my 7 year old son, his first foray into military aircraft. He said, “I liked watching that.” And so another generation is introduced to this passion and I cannot think of a better channel to start his education with. Cheers.
Introduce him to making plastic model kits and see if he likes it. He'll not only learn about planes and tanks etc, but also of world history, and the parts they played in it. He may enjoy it more than video games.
@@LaurenceLDN Well, you're right about that, but there's a lot less plastic in probably 50 model planes, compared to a game console, that is replaced when the latest model is released, and ends up eventually dumped. As well as in the make up and packaging of new games, which once played, share the same fate. I learnt so much from making models, not just from the info supplied about each one, but also from the further reading that it encouraged me to do. There are also balsa wood and cardboard models available as well.
It’s worth noting that it was developed into the Shackleton, which was the very final variant of the Manchester line. That remained in service to the early 90’s.
Indeed. From the mid' 1930's until about 1994... damn impressive for any aircraft lineage. That; and the Manchester line also spawned the Lancastrian, a seperate spinoff aircraft, and the Lanc' / Linc' were the first British aircraft of their size to test turboprop's & straight up jet engines.
@@jimtaylor294 the actual history is,Manchester,Lancaster,York,Lancastrian,Lincoln,Tudor,Shackleton and Vulcan,there were several other civilian versions of the above aircraft,(York and Lancastrian),and can’t forget the old faithful Annie.
The Lincoln was designed with the concept of the 'Bomber Stream' attack method still in mind. It improved on areas where the Lancaster had fallen short which Ed explained. The Lincoln might well have seen service over Europe but for some development issues. For example the 3 blade propellors on the Lincoln B.I caused a lot of vibrations and only 50 or so were made, until it was found that 4-blade props cured it. All the B.Is were then converted to B.IIs. Integration into service took a long time too. For Tiger Force ops, I think the intention was that the Tallboy and Grandslam bombs would be used to bomb Japan's bridges during a land borne invasion of the mainland. I like the Lincoln, it has a place in the RAF's history.
@@toomanyhobbies2011 This was in the early 1960s, and it was a very different world back then. On Sunday afternoons, people used to go for walks on the airfield, past parked Vickers Varsities and Canberras - an RAF police van used to do a circuit of the perimeter track every hour or so, but that's all. The two Lincolns were lying on their bellies at the north east end of the airfield, ready to be used for fire training, and we lived in the married quarters nearby, ( Cardington Road if you want to Google Earth it ). It was easy to slip under the fence and get to the aircraft. Later on, around 1968/9, they were gone, but there was a HP Hastings and a Canberra's cockpit section lying in the same area, both also accessible.
Greetings from Argentina. An important use that was given to the Lincolns in addition to those mentioned in the video was to "bombard" the first Argentine Antarctic bases with supplies until the construction of landing strips.
Greetings from the USA. In 1975, I was assigned to USN patrol squadron VP-65 when we retired the P2V-7 Neptune. Many were mothballed but a few were purchased by Argentina. Their surface search radar came in handy locating the Royal Navy during the Falklands/Malvinas fight.
@@terrystevens5261 - No "malvinas" but the Argentines call a certain islands "Malvinas." or, more specifically, "Islas Malvinas." The English, call them the Falklands. Facts.
@@scootergeorge7089 Yup. 1494, Treaty of Tordesillas, sanctioned in 1506 by Pope Julius II, says that all land everywhere belongs to either Spain or Portugal, with a big dividing line in the Atlantic. No land belongs to heathens, and even less to despicable heretics. The problem is that Popes are infallible (though, technically, they only became infallible 3 centuries later, so a big question relates to whether Papal infallibility is retrospective). So anyway, tough luck for the indigenous inhabitants of South America: convert or ... I dunno, burn in hell for all eternity, perhaps? Either way, no land for you. Fortunately, no-one at all ever lived in the Malvfaklands until some miserable, cold British people decided to try it one day. But, aha, Papal infallibility! So yes, the Failkvinas belong for all eternity to the pious Catholic faithful of Argentina. As long as they remain Catholic, pious and faithful, the fact that they are Conquistadores and imperialists can be forgiven (if they confess and repent, sincerely, all the sins they can think of). But do they remain so? And when they repent their sins, are they truly sincere? God knows.
The engines also soldiered on powering the Canadair Northstar airliner, which delivered hearing loss and tinnitus to many a Trans Canada Airlines traveler.
When i was a kid they were of course called Tin Can Airlines. I believe we have a North Star sitting outside at the Air Museum here in Ottawa waiting for restoration.
Yes, never a good idea to have unrestricted exhaust stacks next to the passenger cabin. I think there was a mod that routed the cabin side outlets to the other side of the nacelle.
I have a photo of my father, standing in the cabin of RAAF A73-31, head above the cockpit, guiding the pilot while taxying after landing at Tengah, July 1951, being the first aircraft to complete 100 operational sorties in Malaya.
I really don't see why they kept making them after ww2 ended. The few Lincolns made before VJ day, along with remaining Lancasters and a few purchased B29s, could have filled the gap from Lancaster to Valiant, especially if they could produce a few B29 components in cooperation and for local parts supply.
My dad was in 205 Sqn for most of his 9 years in the RAF. They flew Sunderlands from RAF Seletar in Singapore and also carried out bombing raids on what were then termed CTs. Bombs were mounted on racks under the wings instead of depth charges. He said he couldn't understand why they were just bombing monkeys and birds, l later found out there may have been method in their madness.
@@alan6832 didnt help that Australia had a Prime Minister who was staunchly supportive of everything British and refused the RAAF the approval to buy American until the Brit equipment became hopelessly obsolete, hence why the RAAF had Lincolns, meteors and Vampires instead of B-29s and F-86s.
Boy ! That' s a hell of a photo at 4mins 10 secs Ed. 3 feathered with just the Starboard inner running ! No margin for error from that pilot ! Thanks Ed. (Someone mentioned Shackleton !)
Phenomenal. Useful to compare the Hornet with the Dornier Pfeil, an aircraft designed for the same purpose but dreadfully over-complicated. Whereas De Havilland simply grafted a single-seat cockpit to a Mossie and made a thousand detail improvements.
That shot at 08.54 looks like the third prototype with three-bladed props that I photo'd at Cranfield in the late fifties/early 60s. Still in camouflage with the 'P' but no guns. Three bladed props upset the harmonics of the a/c so they went for four-bladed. The Cranfield prototype was scrapped. The Napier de-icing Lincoln at Luton had a Lanc nose which made recogmition awkward when, as a schoolboy I walked around it (no security then). Lincolns regularly popped up at Biggin Hill airshows and at one I photo'd the last three on a flypast.
Arguably Shackleton is not a super-Lanc, since it's not a bomber. The Manchester lineage of the Shack is undeniable, but the latter might rather be called a next-generation Sunderland. Whaddya think?
@@javiergilvidal1558Aircraft don't lose development heritage because of change in role. Regardless Lancasters we're used as maritime Recon post war too. Sunderland was a flying boat a totally creature made by a totally different company.
@@dylanmilne6683 .... but not for a "totally different" purpose! Funny, too, that you answer my "The Manchester lineage of the Shack is undeniable ..." with "Aircraft don't lose development heritage because of change in role".
The Shackleton wasn’t quite the final evolution either - the RAAF built four turboprop Lincoln’s that were used in atomic tests in Australia. They were used to drop prototype nuclear devices from 45,000ft to calibrate the aerodynamic models for the British V-bombers.
You learn something new every day, because I always thought the Lincoln was powered by the 37 litre Griffon, as in the Shackleton. I was going by the shape of the radiator nacelle. Apparently it just had uprated 27 litre Merlins from the Lancaster. They used to fly from the Woomera-Evetts Field aerodrome in South Australia.
Considering the fact that active duty Lincolns made it all the way through the 1950s I'd say she didn't do too badly for a design that was basically born obsolete... :-)
Great video, Thanks. I almost always chuckle when I read or hear "Why didn't they simply..." It's hard to predict the future especially when you are fighting a World War.
Finally Ed, IMO, you are doing your channel PERFECTLY. Regular content, SHORT videos usually (very important, I think), always interesting, well presented, good data, HUGE variations in stories PLUS, you have a great delivery...you sound knowledgeable but easy going. And I still love that you save us 15+ seconds from EVERY, OTHER VIDEO site (it seems) and their slightly-condescending, sales pitch 'don't forget to like, subscribe and....blah, blah' after EVERY vid. In my opinion, for what it is worth, you keep this up and you will be over 100K subs FAST. Cheers. ☮
Hi Ed. The South African Air Force used the Avro Shackleton for maritime patrol up to the 1970's if I remember correctly. It would be great if you could include the history of this aircraft when you have the time. Love your videos.
I wonder what the unit costs were for the two aircraft; Lancaster was 1/3rd the cost of a B-29, I see the Lincoln being 1/2 that of the Superfortress. Development costs were definitely larger for the B-29, it was more expensive than the atomic bomb. Edit: this video states you could get 3-4 Lincoln's for a B-29, or 5 Lancasters for a B-29.
When my Dad picked up various B29s from the USA the first thing he would buy was leather or rubber to repair his shoes and boots then chocolate and candies.
I grew up in my early years with the local Air Force having Lincolns at the local Air Base ( Townsville, Queensland. Australia). They used to have open days. I have actually been inside one AND sat in the rear gunner seat. They became coastal patrol planes before the Neptunes began.
me too Dave - I'm bracing myself to make a Manchester conversion from a Lanc in order to complete a 1:72 Bomber Command line up, but would love to make a Lincoln just to end the story
G'day Ed. For someone who specialises in odd and rare aircraft I'm surprised that there was no mention of the long nosed Mk 31 Lincoln of the RAAF. Maybe another time. But keep it up. This is good stuff.
He did touch on "Australian Lincolns of various marks", but I think the main thrust of the vid was to detail its evolution in the RAF context and what lay beyond it.
My Dad flew Lincolns in 83 squadron at RAF Hemswell and for the Bomber Command Bombing School at RAF Lindholm. My claim to fame is that his squadron flew the planes in the film "The Dambusters".
My Dad was flown around Arabia when in Aden in the RAF in a Lincoln in the mid-1950s, one of them had been used in Malaya and was a bit knackered, it never made it home as the fuel tanks broke so it was scrapped locally.
8:37 Quite sure this picture shows MIG 17s. Identifying features including; third wing fence, slightly greater sweep on inner part of wing leading edge, little fin under rear fuselage, base of vertical tail barely overhangs engine outlet.
Mr Nash I must compliment you on your videos. They are just getting better & better, all the time. Not that they weren’t excellent to start with. Keep up the good work.
Ultimate developmemt of the Manchester - a footnote video on the Shackleton would be well worthwhile. Stalwart for Coastal COmmand and of course dragged on into AEW service.
I remember seeing a formation of these flying over on their way to Woodford at the end of their service life. For a few moments I thought Id slipped back in time until I realised what they were! A glorious sight indeed!
Because of the weight, first: these engines were heavier. It would have required an extensive redesign of the wings to accommodate them. And more power for what? Heavier loads? It would have required an enlarge fuselage and new larger wings. A new aircraft, in short. And the speed would have been only marginally better, at the expense of a higher consumption. The Lincoln was an improved Lancaster, not a new design, unlike the B-29. There was only so much that could be done with the Manchester airframe.
As a teenager [around 1956], I got to look inside one at the Government Aircraft Factory in Melbourne. fascinated by the bomb bay bypass, from memory you dragged yourself down this rectangular tunnel by as rope to get to the other end.
I was always under the impression that the next step up from the Lancaster was the Avro Shackleton. In all my years, sadly, this is the first time that I have come to learn of the Lincoln. As time goes by there seems to be more information coming out of the woodwork about innovations that occurred in WWII.
That low level one engine shot was taken over RAF Defford near where i live in Worcestershire. a lot of pioneering radar research took place there, due to it's proximity to the Royal Radar Establishment in Malvern. the worlds first hands off flight and automated landing also took place at RAF Defford. the arcraft used was an old Boeing 247-D airliner that was gifted to the UK by Canada. that happened in 1945 and we now don't even think about it when we board our holiday jets.
well done @ Ed Nash's Military Matters i recently went round one of avro's plants were at least the lancasters were made, Amazing all the avaitional bits still left at abandoned AVRoe manufacturing plant , even finding parts of a avroe tudor. great to hear you information on the Lincoln's progress
54 MU at Lichfield had many Lincolns in LTS 1952-3, very handy for a kip if you were on night picket patrol, I suppose they went to the breakers yard not long after. There was an area there that had been used for A/c’s scrapped, Typhoons, Mosquitos etc., still lots of lights perspex and fittings around in fair order. U/c lamps perfect spotlights for your motorbike.
The film makers used the four Lancs held in storage since the making of the far better film (for aircraft and accuracy) of 'Appointment in London'. It was filmed at a Lincoln/Canberra station so there are many Lincolns in the background with postwar markings. It was difficult to keep the Canberras out of shot. The film company was secretly charged less because the RAF crews merged their film work as continuation training (from the Lincs). After the film the Lancs were quietly flown away to Silloth to be disposed of. Coastal Command kept some MR Lancs until October 1956.
I could only find this information online. However, when I checked the serial numbers against a database of RAF airframes, they were shown as being Avro Lancaster Mk VIIs. Curiously enough the Lancaster Mk IV and Mk V were later designated Lincoln B1 and B2 respectively. Information: "For many, the stars of the film are undoubtedly the Lancasters themselves. It is hard to believe that Lancasters were in short supply when the filming commenced in April 1954. Four Mk.7 aircraft were taken out of storage from 20 Maintenance Unit at RAF Aston Down, Gloucestershire, and specially modified for the film. These were NX673, NX679, NX782 and RT686. In fact, ’673, ’679 and ’782 had already developed a taste for the movies because they had recently starred in Philip Leacock’s feature film about a wartime Lancaster squadron, 'Appointment in London', which was premiered in 1953. To make the Lancaster Mk.7s resemble as closely as possible the actual B.III (Type 464 Provisioning) aircraft that flew on the Dams raid in 1943, three (NX673, NX679 and RT686) were specially modified at Hemswell by a working party from the AV Roe Repair Organisation at Bracebridge Heath, Lincolnshire. Purists will notice a number of differences between wartime Lancasters and the Mk.7s that appear in the film. Perhaps the most obvious is the Frazer-Nash FN82 poweroperated rear turret that was equipped with twin Browning 0.50in machine guns. In 1943, the Lancasters of 617 Squadron would have been fitted with FN20 rear turrets armed with four of the less-potent 0.303in Brownings. In addition, the series of small windows along each side of the fuselage that were a noticeable feature of wartime Lancasters were deleted from the post-war Mk.7. And note, too, the absence of the engine exhaust covers that would have been present on wartime Lancasters to reduce glare and suppress sparks from the hot exhausts at night."
At the speeds the Lincoln does, visibility matters more than pure aerodynamics. Remember: the Lancaster's round bubble is a bomb-aimer's station only; the Lincoln's nose also has to serve as the nose gunner's sighting station since the actual gun turret is "blind" unlike that of the Lanc.
@@javiergilvidal1558 , no he wasnt in the packaging industry nor was he a pilot. Infact he was an architect and an aircraft enthusiast especially for the ones from the second world war.
Regarding the B-29, there were also massive development problems with it and for a while it looked like it would die before it saw any active service due to the problems but the US, being the US, stuck at it and got it working finally.
The photo at 1:50 appears to show the Lincoln flying with both starboard engines shut down and props feathered - presumably part of the testing regime.
I was born and raised in Hatfield (South Yorkshire) near RAF Lindholm, under the flight-path to the north-west of the aerodrome. An enduring memory from the mid 1950s is watching Lincolns climbing towards and over our house, their Merlin engines on full power, still at a relatively low altitude. They were eventually replaced by Hastings, which although just as noisy, were not the same spectacle as the Lincolns.
I spent my last 18 months of RAF service at Lindholm on Lincolns as an engine Tech. We also had 1 Hastings and about 8 Varsities as the Station ended up as the Bomber Command Bombing School for Navigators who were destined for the new V bomber force.
My father worked at the Experimental Workshops of the Department of Aircraft Production at Fisherman's Bend, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. I remember him talking about being involved in experiments to convert Lancasters into Lincolns.
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 I have Never been a fan of WW2 British Heavy Bombers Including those Joining B29s Over Japan if the War were to Continue. You're Correct the Lincoln was Obsolete and the RAF Washingtons as Well.
I remember seeing a out of service Lincoln park near the runway at Wagga Wagga at RAAF airbase Forest Hill mid 1970's when I was around 6 years old when there was a Air show
I never heard of this plane thanks again for bringing it to my attention I do alot of writing on alternative history so rare aircraft like this give me all kinds of ideas thanks again!
Greetings from Argentine Patagonia. What was expressed for use by our country is correct, but one more use was missing: At the beginning of the 50s Argentina's strong presence began in Antarctica, but there was no good landing strip, so the Lincolns were used for "bomb" the bases with food and other supplies. A very anecdotal use was the bombardment of the Perito Moreno glacier (I don't remember the year) because the glacier did not break like it usually does every 4 years, and a lot of water was accumulating with the danger that this entails. By The way 0:21 Narrator:"- But no plane last forever......" C-130: "-Hold my jet A-1"
Not forgetting the big Short Stirling, the heavy bomber that was restricted by politics and not allowed to be developed, had the Stirling been allowed its big wings it was more than a match for the Lancaster.
A big problem with the Stirling was the angle of attack on the wings. Rather than rebuild it (which would have produced a nose down flying stance as per the Whitley) they just lengthened the landing gear to get the wings at the right angle for take off. The spindly undercarriage was responsible for many take-off and landing accidents. The upper fuselage and wings were taken from the Short Sunderland. The Stirling had a limited bomb load and the segmented bomb bay restricted the ordnance it could carry. The standard hanger was 112 feet, and servicing was to be carried out in the open air. The 100 feet wingspan was part of the Air Ministry specification I believe it was all electric. I have a fire axe that is rated safe at 1,000 volts that came from my grandfather who worked for Shorts.
Another great vid, loving going through your back catalogue :) One thing though, I thought you could have mentioned the maritime patrol 'stretched' Lincoln the RAAF developed.
@@petersouthernboy6327 Not even remotely true, the Lancaster could carry much more weight than the B-17, and beat the gross weight by 11,000 pounds (54,000 against the Lancaster's 65,000 in normal operation, more with modifications such as needed for the Grand-slam bomb which itself wrighed in at 22,000 lbs.
Well, another Remembrance Day here in Canada. I am lucky to live in Southern Ontario, where we get to see one of the only Lancasters still flying, pass over the memorial services at the the Cenotaph. Look forward to it every year.
Are there any Lincolns displayed in Museums anywhere? I recall seeing something during the 90s regarding the disposal of the bombers by setting them on fire. I hope I am mistaken.
A similar argument has been made in support of the m-91 carcano rifle; not the most modern battle rifle - not even in the Italian inventory - but adequate to the task and far cheaper than retooling and replacing the existing inventory at a time when resources were severely constrained.
I note that you do not refer to the final modification of the Lincoln, the so - called "Long - Nosed" Lincoln. Which had an extended nose. Which housed an additional crew member. They were used by RAAF Marine Reconnaissance. They were withdrawn from service around 1957. And scrapped in the early 1960's.
Excellent account. In war, especially when it seems yiur on the home run, expence on aircraft design is hard to justify. As was mentioned, it was basically an up designed Lancaster. In the 1950s both Jet engines and turbo prop engines were coming out with so much more power. The C130 Hercules was designed around 1954. Note, even the highly advanced B29 was on its way out shortly after the war.
a bit off subject but 7:59 reminds me of when I was at Duxford for the centenary celebrations of the RAF (2018) , when I ( and many others ) saw a Lancaster , a Panavia Tornado , and an F 35 (B ? ) flying in formation
A criminally underrated aircraft IMO. Ironically the Shackleton - in some ways a shortened Lincoln - proved much more could be squeezed from the airframe, with her four *RR Griffon* engines turning contra-rotating propellers, complimented with two Viper turbojets. Russia's postwar Tupolev Bear, certainly suggests that the Lincoln could have been developed further, in a more useful way than the *Boeing Washingtons* we had for a relativy short time, and - to the best of my knowledge - never carried nukes, which is what they were theoretically for.
And if you want to see an actual Lincoln, go to the RAF Museum at Cosford in England. You can also see two of the V-Bombers there too, a Vulcan and a Victor.
The origin of the Lincoln was the twin engine Avro Manchester (not ideal) which morphed in the four engined Lancaster (a HUGE success), then as the war neared the end, the LINCOLN materialised. Apart from the normal production run in the UK, Australia built 73 Lincolns at Fishermen's Bend (CAC -Commonwealth Aircraft Factory) Melbourne VIC..
What's the bubble on the bottom of the fuselage? Targeting radar? I suppose one could argue the next step in evolution was the Shackleton, though that was actually a marine patrol bomber.
@@bop3752 An American Federally Funded Pubic school system. At the time the Inch system was the only system in this country, Which kept this country Great.
Hopefully you'll be doing a video about another development of the Lancaster- the Avro Lancastrian civil airliner built / converted in the UK and Canada.
It would seem foolhardy to develop a Superfortress clone with the jet age at the door. There were about to be plenty of B29’s in storage as the B50 came on stream.
When I was a kid I used to see the shakelton flying over the north east coast on sub patrol. Didn't look outdated to me. It looked beautifully belligerent especially those two 20s sticking out of the front turret. Same stable, same quality. Too young to see a Lincoln unfortunately
I may have mentioned this on this channel before so apologies If I have, but I live in Chadderton, Oldham, about a mile from what used to be an Avro factory, don't know if these were built there? I know Lancaster's were, Sadly you wouldn't have any clue as to what the factory used to be if you didn't already know, I didn't for years, There's no sign or some kind of statue commemorating what used to be there, there should be.
Yes there should be and there was a makeshift one visible for years as I was growing up in the 60s and 70s. What was purported to be a Lancaster wing protruded northwards from a hangar halfway down Greengate. It would be interesting if anyone can verify this.
@@donquixote3927 I couldn't, my family before I was born in the mid 70's were mostly from Shaw and Fitton Hill, never ventured into this area, so I doubt they would know either. I know a neighbour in her 80's whose lived across the street in New Moston all her life, I could ask her.
RAF Hemswell 1953-54. My father was an 83 squadron Lincoln rear gunner. Flew 20 sorties from RAF Tengah, Malaya. That followed his 40 operations as a Halifax rear gunner in 1944.
@@sirronnorris3343 I flew as as crew on several 6 hour flights. I spent most of the time on the rest bed just below the mid upper turret as my headset was duff. Happy days. Alan.
I've been reading about World War ll since 1965, and I've Never Heard of This Model Until Now! That's how important channels like this are. Thank you for your excellent work and presentation, Ed Nash!
I was a navigator on Lincolns with 61 squadron at Waddington, Eastleigh Nairobi, and Wittering, and later with 83 squadron at Hemswell.before joining the V Force Valiants at Marham. I am 90 years old now, and joined the RAF in 1950 as a cadet navigator.
Thank you for your service. You secured our freedom and safety. o7
How cool. Glad you found this video sir and an honor to meet you
I hope you are keeping well. 🫡
My respects to you, Sir
Godbless you sir and thank you for protecting mine and others futures❤️🙏🏻
I just watched this with my 7 year old son, his first foray into military aircraft. He said, “I liked watching that.” And so another generation is introduced to this passion and I cannot think of a better channel to start his education with. Cheers.
Excellent! Though please check my videos before showing him, I do have bad language/adult humour in a few.
Lovely anecdote!
Introduce him to making plastic model kits and see if he likes it. He'll not only learn about planes and tanks etc, but also of world history, and the parts they played in it. He may enjoy it more than video games.
@@warrenmilford1329 I'm not sure the world needs any more plastic...
@@LaurenceLDN Well, you're right about that, but there's a lot less plastic in probably 50 model planes, compared to a game console, that is replaced when the latest model is released, and ends up eventually dumped. As well as in the make up and packaging of new games, which once played, share the same fate. I learnt so much from making models, not just from the info supplied about each one, but also from the further reading that it encouraged me to do. There are also balsa wood and cardboard models available as well.
It’s worth noting that it was developed into the Shackleton, which was the very final variant of the Manchester line. That remained in service to the early 90’s.
Indeed. From the mid' 1930's until about 1994... damn impressive for any aircraft lineage.
That; and the Manchester line also spawned the Lancastrian, a seperate spinoff aircraft, and the Lanc' / Linc' were the first British aircraft of their size to test turboprop's & straight up jet engines.
Another awesome name. It should be given to another tough plane.
Sadly the Shackleton only saw action once with South Africans in its whole international service life
I was at Lossiemouth with the Shackleton,the BBMF had the engines and all the spares after the Shackleton left service.
@@jimtaylor294 the actual history is,Manchester,Lancaster,York,Lancastrian,Lincoln,Tudor,Shackleton and Vulcan,there were several other civilian versions of the above aircraft,(York and Lancastrian),and can’t forget the old faithful Annie.
The Lincoln was designed with the concept of the 'Bomber Stream' attack method still in mind. It improved on areas where the Lancaster had fallen short which Ed explained. The Lincoln might well have seen service over Europe but for some development issues. For example the 3 blade propellors on the Lincoln B.I caused a lot of vibrations and only 50 or so were made, until it was found that 4-blade props cured it. All the B.Is were then converted to B.IIs. Integration into service took a long time too.
For Tiger Force ops, I think the intention was that the Tallboy and Grandslam bombs would be used to bomb Japan's bridges during a land borne invasion of the mainland. I like the Lincoln, it has a place in the RAF's history.
When I was a child, I used to sneak under the fence at RAF Watton, and play inside a couple of abandoned Lincolns.
That would have been definitely fun.
Dropping pretend bombs on Japan!!
You lucky dog!
And somehow security just missed you? IDBY
Wouldn't have been so much fun bumping into an RAF dog.🐕
@@toomanyhobbies2011 This was in the early 1960s, and it was a very different world back then. On Sunday afternoons, people used to go for walks on the airfield, past parked Vickers Varsities and Canberras - an RAF police van used to do a circuit of the perimeter track every hour or so, but that's all. The two Lincolns were lying on their bellies at the north east end of the airfield, ready to be used for fire training, and we lived in the married quarters nearby, ( Cardington Road if you want to Google Earth it ). It was easy to slip under the fence and get to the aircraft. Later on, around 1968/9, they were gone, but there was a HP Hastings and a Canberra's cockpit section lying in the same area, both also accessible.
Greetings from Argentina. An important use that was given to the Lincolns in addition to those mentioned in the video was to "bombard" the first Argentine Antarctic bases with supplies until the construction of landing strips.
Greetings from the USA. In 1975, I was assigned to USN patrol squadron VP-65 when we retired the P2V-7 Neptune. Many were mothballed but a few were purchased by Argentina. Their surface search radar came in handy locating the Royal Navy during the Falklands/Malvinas fight.
"LV-ZEI" 🙂
@@scootergeorge7089 There are no such islands as the malvinas.
@@terrystevens5261 - No "malvinas" but the Argentines call a certain islands "Malvinas." or, more specifically, "Islas Malvinas." The English, call them the Falklands. Facts.
@@scootergeorge7089 Yup. 1494, Treaty of Tordesillas, sanctioned in 1506 by Pope Julius II, says that all land everywhere belongs to either Spain or Portugal, with a big dividing line in the Atlantic. No land belongs to heathens, and even less to despicable heretics. The problem is that Popes are infallible (though, technically, they only became infallible 3 centuries later, so a big question relates to whether Papal infallibility is retrospective). So anyway, tough luck for the indigenous inhabitants of South America: convert or ... I dunno, burn in hell for all eternity, perhaps? Either way, no land for you. Fortunately, no-one at all ever lived in the Malvfaklands until some miserable, cold British people decided to try it one day. But, aha, Papal infallibility! So yes, the Failkvinas belong for all eternity to the pious Catholic faithful of Argentina. As long as they remain Catholic, pious and faithful, the fact that they are Conquistadores and imperialists can be forgiven (if they confess and repent, sincerely, all the sins they can think of). But do they remain so? And when they repent their sins, are they truly sincere? God knows.
The engines also soldiered on powering the Canadair Northstar airliner, which delivered hearing loss and tinnitus to many a Trans Canada Airlines traveler.
When i was a kid they were of course called Tin Can Airlines. I believe we have a North Star sitting outside at the Air Museum here in Ottawa waiting for restoration.
Yes, never a good idea to have unrestricted exhaust stacks next to the passenger cabin. I think there was a mod that routed the cabin side outlets to the other side of the nacelle.
@@garethonthetube Yeah I think so. That was why the first class section of most piston airliners was at the BACK, not the front.
I have a photo of my father, standing in the cabin of RAAF A73-31, head above the cockpit, guiding the pilot while taxying after landing at Tengah, July 1951, being the first aircraft to complete 100 operational sorties in Malaya.
My father was a Gunnie with the RAAF loading the Lincolns with bombs during the Malayan Emergency. He always a a soft spot the the aircraft.
I really don't see why they kept making them after ww2 ended. The few Lincolns made before VJ day, along with remaining Lancasters and a few purchased B29s, could have filled the gap from Lancaster to Valiant, especially if they could produce a few B29 components in cooperation and for local parts supply.
My dad was in 205 Sqn for most of his 9 years in the RAF. They flew Sunderlands from RAF Seletar in Singapore and also carried out bombing raids on what were then termed CTs. Bombs were mounted on racks under the wings instead of depth charges. He said he couldn't understand why they were just bombing monkeys and birds, l later found out there may have been method in their madness.
@@alan6832 didnt help that Australia had a Prime Minister who was staunchly supportive of everything British and refused the RAAF the approval to buy American until the Brit equipment became hopelessly obsolete, hence why the RAAF had Lincolns, meteors and Vampires instead of B-29s and F-86s.
I've just got back from the pub after a six pint session and got this gem to watch. Thanks Ed!
Good Man
Boy ! That' s a hell of a photo at 4mins 10 secs Ed. 3 feathered with just the Starboard inner running ! No margin for error from that pilot ! Thanks Ed. (Someone mentioned Shackleton !)
WOW!
Is that an RAAF turbo-prop variant?
Ekeing out flight in ground effect?
@@DickHolman Flying testbed.
A terrific analysis of the end state of the Avro Manchester. The context for the aircraft in post-war era is spot on!
Since you are doing post war aircraft can you do the DH Hornets one aircraft that is forgotten in history
love that plane
Phenomenal. Useful to compare the Hornet with the Dornier Pfeil, an aircraft designed for the same purpose but dreadfully over-complicated. Whereas De Havilland simply grafted a single-seat cockpit to a Mossie and made a thousand detail improvements.
@@raypurchase801
Yep.
Metal spar
Straight spar
Offset landing gear
Smaller nacelles
Thinner wings
Counter rotating props
Etc etc etc
@@brucebaxter6923 Agreed.
The British know how to "Stretch" a design.
Ask any MGB owner.
BTW the Shackelton wasn't taken out of service until
The late 80s /early 90s
TH-cam agrees, here's a 1990's doc about them th-cam.com/video/elENLa01XHA/w-d-xo.html
@@davecoz4227 thanks 😊
And the V Bombers hit the Falklands and refuelled the fleet for decades!
Yup Canberra is still in service with NASA I believe
@@WoT_the_Feck Yep.
That shot at 08.54 looks like the third prototype with three-bladed props that I photo'd at Cranfield in the late fifties/early 60s. Still in camouflage with the 'P' but no guns. Three bladed props upset the harmonics of the a/c so they went for four-bladed. The Cranfield prototype was scrapped. The Napier de-icing Lincoln at Luton had a Lanc nose which made recogmition awkward when, as a schoolboy I walked around it (no security then). Lincolns regularly popped up at Biggin Hill airshows and at one I photo'd the last three on a flypast.
Finally evolution? Shackleton anyone?
Yep, the super-lincoln aka the super-super Lancaster, or the super-super-super Manchester...
Arguably Shackleton is not a super-Lanc, since it's not a bomber. The Manchester lineage of the Shack is undeniable, but the latter might rather be called a next-generation Sunderland. Whaddya think?
@@javiergilvidal1558Aircraft don't lose development heritage because of change in role. Regardless Lancasters we're used as maritime Recon post war too. Sunderland was a flying boat a totally creature made by a totally different company.
@@dylanmilne6683 .... but not for a "totally different" purpose! Funny, too, that you answer my "The Manchester lineage of the Shack is undeniable ..." with "Aircraft don't lose development heritage because of change in role".
The Shackleton wasn’t quite the final evolution either - the RAAF built four turboprop Lincoln’s that were used in atomic tests in Australia. They were used to drop prototype nuclear devices from 45,000ft to calibrate the aerodynamic models for the British V-bombers.
You learn something new every day, because I always thought the Lincoln was powered by the 37 litre Griffon, as in the Shackleton. I was going by the shape of the radiator nacelle. Apparently it just had uprated 27 litre Merlins from the Lancaster. They used to fly from the Woomera-Evetts Field aerodrome in South Australia.
@@wilburfinnigan2142 The Lancaster could carry 14,000lb to Berlin. Not exactly short range in the context of the war against Germany.
@@wilburfinnigan2142The US gave nothing they made the UK pay
@@wilburfinnigan2142 Lancaster 1660 miles with 14000 lb
Considering the fact that active duty Lincolns made it all the way through the 1950s I'd say she didn't do too badly for a design that was basically born obsolete... :-)
British Classic
Great video, Thanks. I almost always chuckle when I read or hear "Why didn't they simply..."
It's hard to predict the future especially when you are fighting a World War.
Finally Ed, IMO, you are doing your channel PERFECTLY.
Regular content, SHORT videos usually (very important, I think), always interesting, well presented, good data, HUGE variations in stories PLUS, you have a great delivery...you sound knowledgeable but easy going.
And I still love that you save us 15+ seconds from EVERY, OTHER VIDEO site (it seems) and their slightly-condescending, sales pitch 'don't forget to like, subscribe and....blah, blah' after EVERY vid.
In my opinion, for what it is worth, you keep this up and you will be over 100K subs FAST.
Cheers.
☮
I love that shot (nerves of steel to take it!) of the single engined Linc flying on the deck during proximity fuse testing.
This channel is turning out as one of my favorites! Keep up the good work!
Hi Ed. The South African Air Force used the Avro Shackleton for maritime patrol up to the 1970's if I remember correctly. It would be great if you could include the history of this aircraft when you have the time. Love your videos.
The shack deserves it's own vid in time:)
Lets also not forget shortly after came the Canberra and the V bombers. It was just a question of timing.
03:18 - Note the Village Inn radar under the tail turret. Best photo of the install I have seen.
My Dad flew the Lincoln and the B29 and thought that there was no comparison, he loved the B29
Where the
Lincoln looks like another B-32 failure
@@tomstevenson161 Yet the Lincoln wasn't a failure, unlike the B-32.
I wonder what the unit costs were for the two aircraft; Lancaster was 1/3rd the cost of a B-29, I see the Lincoln being 1/2 that of the Superfortress. Development costs were definitely larger for the B-29, it was more expensive than the atomic bomb.
Edit: this video states you could get 3-4 Lincoln's for a B-29, or 5 Lancasters for a B-29.
When my Dad picked up various B29s from the USA the first thing he would buy was leather or rubber to repair his shoes and boots then chocolate and candies.
Well, the RAF preferred the B29 and flew them in early 50s as a stop gap till the VBombers arrived.
I grew up in my early years with the local Air Force having Lincolns at the local Air Base ( Townsville, Queensland. Australia). They used to have open days. I have actually been inside one AND sat in the rear gunner seat. They became coastal patrol planes before the Neptunes began.
I'm still awaiting for a 1/72 scale model kit of the Avro Lincoln to be released.
me too Dave - I'm bracing myself to make a Manchester conversion from a Lanc in order to complete a 1:72 Bomber Command line up, but would love to make a Lincoln just to end the story
You can purchase a conversion kit that makes a Lincoln from an Airfix Lancaster B.I/III kit, made by a company called Flightpath UK.
Get on it Airfix!
@@PiersLawsonBrown1972 www.southernskymodels.com.au/AVRO-GAFLincolnMk-30-Mk-31EnhancementSet-4158.html
Yes, long overdue. Come on Airfix!!
G'day Ed. For someone who specialises in odd and rare aircraft I'm surprised that there was no mention of the long nosed Mk 31 Lincoln of the RAAF. Maybe another time.
But keep it up. This is good stuff.
He did touch on "Australian Lincolns of various marks", but I think the main thrust of the vid was to detail its evolution in the RAF context and what lay beyond it.
My Dad flew Lincolns in 83 squadron at RAF Hemswell and for the Bomber Command Bombing School at RAF Lindholm. My claim to fame is that his squadron flew the planes in the film "The Dambusters".
Parts of the film where filmed at hemswell as well I believe
@@dean-gm1lg yes, it was used as Scampton.
@@stracepipe I thought so I go to carboot and autojumble at hemswell
My Dad was flown around Arabia when in Aden in the RAF in a Lincoln in the mid-1950s, one of them had been used in Malaya and was a bit knackered, it never made it home as the fuel tanks broke so it was scrapped locally.
8:37 Quite sure this picture shows MIG 17s. Identifying features including; third wing fence, slightly greater sweep on inner part of wing leading edge, little fin under rear fuselage, base of vertical tail barely overhangs engine outlet.
Loving this series on lesser known aircraft! Can I add a vote for the Armstrong whitworth Whitley?
That's so 1930's
@@simonmcowan6874 Yeah has 1937 written all over it! Angular, but I love it! I also love the Skua and Whirlwind lol
It's one of those aircraft that looks like an April Fools joke-but the government fell for it!
@@oxcart4172 what can I say.. I love the ugly ducklings lol To fair the Whitley along with the Wellington did Stirling work early in the war
@@mcal27 it has er...character, I suppose!
Mr Nash
I must compliment you on your videos. They are just getting better & better, all the time. Not that they weren’t excellent to start with.
Keep up the good work.
No aircraft lasts forever... except the B-52 , and the KC-135
Don’t forget to C-130 and the U-2.
Tu-95
@@AtheistOrphan
you’re Right in both accounts.
The U-2’s ‘replacements’ SR-71 and A-12 are all in museums, now.
@@KnowYoutheDukeofArgyll1841
Of course!! the loudest plane ever, also the longest lasting!
And the U2
Ultimate developmemt of the Manchester - a footnote video on the Shackleton would be well worthwhile. Stalwart for Coastal COmmand and of course dragged on into AEW service.
Was just about to make the same comment.
Yep, my immediate thought too.
I remember visiting a couple of retired Shackletons at Gatwick
The Shackleton was also used in the ASW role before being replaced by the Nimrod.
I remember seeing a formation of these flying over on their way to Woodford at the end of their service life. For a few moments I thought Id slipped back in time until I realised what they were! A glorious sight indeed!
Not to mention the Tudor or Ashton
Uncle Roy would want you to look at the Short Sperrin next, Ed....
Thank you for this, but i can´t help wondering why they did´nt use the Griffon or the Centaurus engine, and stuck it on a tricycle landingear...
Because of the weight, first: these engines were heavier. It would have required an extensive redesign of the wings to accommodate them.
And more power for what? Heavier loads? It would have required an enlarge fuselage and new larger wings. A new aircraft, in short. And the speed would have been only marginally better, at the expense of a higher consumption.
The Lincoln was an improved Lancaster, not a new design, unlike the B-29. There was only so much that could be done with the Manchester airframe.
As a teenager [around 1956], I got to look inside one at the Government Aircraft Factory in Melbourne. fascinated by the bomb bay bypass, from memory you dragged yourself down this rectangular tunnel by as rope to get to the other end.
I was always under the impression that the next step up from the Lancaster was the Avro Shackleton. In all my years, sadly, this is the first time that I have come to learn of the Lincoln. As time goes by there seems to be more information coming out of the woodwork about innovations that occurred in WWII.
It was no secret.
Very interesting video. Thanks for taking the time to produce and upload it.
Great info did it turn into a Shackleton eventually I remember seeing it at finningly back in the 80's
That low level one engine shot was taken over RAF Defford near where i live in Worcestershire. a lot of pioneering radar research took place there, due to it's proximity to the Royal Radar Establishment in Malvern. the worlds first hands off flight and automated landing also took place at RAF Defford. the arcraft used was an old Boeing 247-D airliner that was gifted to the UK by Canada. that happened in 1945 and we now don't even think about it when we board our holiday jets.
Vickers had a much more advanced bomber in development at the sea time, called the "Windsor", but it did not go into production.
well done @
Ed Nash's Military Matters i recently went round one of avro's plants were at least the lancasters were made, Amazing all the avaitional bits still left at abandoned AVRoe manufacturing plant , even finding parts of a avroe tudor. great to hear you information on the Lincoln's progress
The 2:22 dark stripes on the wings behind the engines, are these oil streaks or paint scheme ?
Engine exhaust staining.
54 MU at Lichfield had many Lincolns in LTS 1952-3, very handy for a kip if you were on night picket patrol, I suppose they went to the breakers yard not long after. There was an area there that had been used for A/c’s scrapped, Typhoons, Mosquitos etc., still lots of lights perspex and fittings around in fair order. U/c lamps perfect spotlights for your motorbike.
The Lincoln doubled for Lancasters in the "Dam Buster" film.
Another great episode Ed.Great work.
Really ? I think you're wrong but l will check up ! I thought the RAF used and adapted 5 Lancasters for the film .
No, they're definitely Lancs.
The film makers used the four Lancs held in storage since the making of the far better film (for aircraft and accuracy) of 'Appointment in London'. It was filmed at a Lincoln/Canberra station so there are many Lincolns in the background with postwar markings. It was difficult to keep the Canberras out of shot. The film company was secretly charged less because the RAF crews merged their film work as continuation training (from the Lincs). After the film the Lancs were quietly flown away to Silloth to be disposed of. Coastal Command kept some MR Lancs until October 1956.
@@johnjephcote7636: correct, as described in the book Filming the Dam Busters by Jonathan Falconer.
I could only find this information online.
However, when I checked the serial numbers against a database of RAF airframes, they were shown as being Avro Lancaster Mk VIIs.
Curiously enough the Lancaster Mk IV and Mk V were later designated Lincoln B1 and B2 respectively.
Information:
"For many, the stars of the film are undoubtedly the Lancasters themselves. It is hard to believe that Lancasters were in short supply when the filming commenced in April 1954.
Four Mk.7 aircraft were taken out of storage from 20 Maintenance Unit at RAF Aston Down, Gloucestershire, and specially modified for the film.
These were NX673, NX679, NX782 and RT686. In fact, ’673, ’679 and ’782 had already developed a taste for the movies because they had recently starred in Philip Leacock’s feature film about a wartime Lancaster squadron, 'Appointment in London', which was premiered in 1953.
To make the Lancaster Mk.7s resemble as closely as possible the actual B.III (Type 464 Provisioning) aircraft that flew on the Dams raid in 1943, three (NX673, NX679 and RT686) were specially modified at Hemswell by a working party from the AV Roe Repair Organisation at Bracebridge Heath, Lincolnshire.
Purists will notice a number of differences between wartime Lancasters and the Mk.7s that appear in the film. Perhaps the most obvious is the Frazer-Nash FN82 poweroperated rear turret that was equipped with twin Browning 0.50in machine guns. In 1943, the Lancasters of 617 Squadron would have been fitted with FN20 rear turrets armed with four of the less-potent 0.303in Brownings.
In addition, the series of small windows along each side of the fuselage that were a noticeable feature of wartime Lancasters were deleted from the post-war Mk.7.
And note, too, the absence of the engine exhaust covers that would have been present on wartime Lancasters to reduce glare and suppress sparks from the hot exhausts at night."
I wonder why they didn't change the nose for more speed? It looks as aerodynamic as a Mack truck.
it's fugly isn't it?
It was a so called' ideal nose' (why I don't know) A production Vickers Windsor if built would have had something very similar.
@@atilllathehun1212 I would guess the guys from marketing thought it sounded better than "garden shed" nose.
At the speeds the Lincoln does, visibility matters more than pure aerodynamics. Remember: the Lancaster's round bubble is a bomb-aimer's station only; the Lincoln's nose also has to serve as the nose gunner's sighting station since the actual gun turret is "blind" unlike that of the Lanc.
I wish my father was around, he would have tripped out on these vids!!
Was he a packy Halifax pilot?
@@javiergilvidal1558 , no he wasnt in the packaging industry nor was he a pilot. Infact he was an architect and an aircraft enthusiast especially for the ones from the second world war.
@@pushkarajdongre packaging industry - love it. Nice comeback, sir. Some people are so thick they can't even spell their insults properly.
Fascinating.
Where did the Avro Shackleton come from?
Great report.
Thanks.
Regarding the B-29, there were also massive development problems with it and for a while it looked like it would die before it saw any active service due to the problems but the US, being the US, stuck at it and got it working finally.
Usually, if you throw enough money at a problem, it can be overcome. Not the smartest solution (usually), but a reliable one.
The B29 was a very advanced design with pioneering features which naturally bring problems, the B 29 made everything else look stone age .
The photo at 1:50 appears to show the Lincoln flying with both starboard engines shut down and props feathered - presumably part of the testing regime.
I was born and raised in Hatfield (South Yorkshire) near RAF Lindholm, under the flight-path to the north-west of the aerodrome. An enduring memory from the mid 1950s is watching Lincolns climbing towards and over our house, their Merlin engines on full power, still at a relatively low altitude. They were eventually replaced by Hastings, which although just as noisy, were not the same spectacle as the Lincolns.
I spent my last 18 months of RAF service at Lindholm on Lincolns as an engine Tech. We also had 1 Hastings and about 8 Varsities as the Station ended up as the Bomber Command Bombing School for Navigators who were destined for the new V bomber force.
At around the 1:55 mark, the Lincoln is flying on 2 engines. Is this to improve cruise range or for testing? Or something else?
My father worked at the Experimental Workshops of the Department of Aircraft Production at Fisherman's Bend, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. I remember him talking about being involved in experiments to convert Lancasters into Lincolns.
To be fair, the B29 was equally as vulnerable to the Mig 15, it wasn’t that much faster than the Lincoln, not enough to challenge a 650mph jet.
Right. At that point, maneuverability and damage resistance were probably more important.
The B29 had a much more lethal Defensive armament and more range.
@@jeffreywilliams144 no it didn't. Its defence was no match for jets. Jets made these bombers obsolete
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 I have Never been a fan of WW2 British Heavy Bombers Including those Joining B29s Over Japan if the War were to Continue. You're Correct the Lincoln was Obsolete and the RAF Washingtons as Well.
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 Just an Aside I am not talking About Korean War Skies here.
I remember seeing a out of service Lincoln park near the runway at Wagga Wagga at RAAF airbase Forest Hill mid 1970's when I was around 6 years old when there was a Air show
I never heard of this plane thanks again for bringing it to my attention I do alot of writing on alternative history so rare aircraft like this give me all kinds of ideas thanks again!
Greetings from Argentine Patagonia. What was expressed for use by our country is correct, but one more use was missing: At the beginning of the 50s Argentina's strong presence began in Antarctica, but there was no good landing strip, so the Lincolns were used for "bomb" the bases with food and other supplies. A very anecdotal use was the bombardment of the Perito Moreno glacier (I don't remember the year) because the glacier did not break like it usually does every 4 years, and a lot of water was accumulating with the danger that this entails.
By The way
0:21 Narrator:"- But no plane last forever......"
C-130: "-Hold my jet A-1"
Not forgetting the big Short Stirling, the heavy bomber that was restricted by politics and not allowed to be developed, had the Stirling been allowed its big wings it was more than a match for the Lancaster.
@Keep Campaigning The hangar size thing is a myth. Look it up.
A big problem with the Stirling was the angle of attack on the wings. Rather than rebuild it (which would have produced a nose down flying stance as per the Whitley) they just lengthened the landing gear to get the wings at the right angle for take off. The spindly undercarriage was responsible for many take-off and landing accidents.
The upper fuselage and wings were taken from the Short Sunderland. The Stirling had a limited bomb load and the segmented bomb bay restricted the ordnance it could carry.
The standard hanger was 112 feet, and servicing was to be carried out in the open air. The 100 feet wingspan was part of the Air Ministry specification
I believe it was all electric. I have a fire axe that is rated safe at 1,000 volts that came from my grandfather who worked for Shorts.
Great video, once again! I thoroughly enjoy your work.
Very interesting I knew almost nothing about the Lincoln until now. And I know a lot more about it's successor the Shackleton. Thank you.
Another great vid, loving going through your back catalogue :)
One thing though, I thought you could have mentioned the maritime patrol 'stretched' Lincoln the RAAF developed.
I'm tempted to do that as a one off sometime.
@@EdNashsMilitaryMatters Brilliant! Love your work mate, thank you :)
Wasn't a Lanc in the running as the aircraft to drop the atomic bombs, as they could take bigger bomb loads? I'm shore I saw a video about that.
That was a Mark Felton video.
That's right, thanks
Not seriously. The Lancaster had the same total gross take off weight as the B-17.
@@jasonkeen3777 The B-29 was *always* going to be the plane to carry the atomic bomb and Spaatz never seriously considered anything else.
@@petersouthernboy6327 Not even remotely true, the Lancaster could carry much more weight than the B-17, and beat the gross weight by 11,000 pounds (54,000 against the Lancaster's 65,000 in normal operation, more with modifications such as needed for the Grand-slam bomb which itself wrighed in at 22,000 lbs.
Well, another Remembrance Day here in Canada. I am lucky to live in Southern Ontario, where we get to see one of the only Lancasters still flying, pass over the memorial services at the the Cenotaph. Look forward to it every year.
Are there any Lincolns displayed in Museums anywhere? I recall seeing something during the 90s regarding the disposal of the bombers by setting them on fire. I hope I am mistaken.
Avro Shackleton next? Or maybe Tudor and Ashton?
Is that a small Radar Dome just below the tail gunner???
If it is it would have sure given night fighters a few problems.
One could argue that the final evolution of the Manchester/Lancaster was the Shackleton.
Love your videos. Please keep them coming!
A very interesting video Mr.Ed.Have a good one.
A similar argument has been made in support of the m-91 carcano rifle; not the most modern battle rifle - not even in the Italian inventory - but adequate to the task and far cheaper than retooling and replacing the existing inventory at a time when resources were severely constrained.
Love this video's, hope you'll do one on the DO-26 sometime????
I thoroughly enjoyed my VIP-Day visit and trip in a Lancaster at East Kirkby, Lincolnshire, England.
Should be on everybody's "bucket list".
I note that you do not refer to the final modification of the Lincoln, the so - called "Long - Nosed" Lincoln. Which had an extended nose. Which housed an additional crew member. They were used by RAAF Marine Reconnaissance. They were withdrawn from service around 1957. And scrapped in the early 1960's.
Excellent account. In war, especially when it seems yiur on the home run, expence on aircraft design is hard to justify. As was mentioned, it was basically an up designed Lancaster.
In the 1950s both Jet engines and turbo prop engines were coming out with so much more power. The C130 Hercules was designed around 1954.
Note, even the highly advanced B29 was on its way out shortly after the war.
a bit off subject but 7:59 reminds me of when I was at Duxford for the centenary celebrations of the RAF (2018) , when I ( and many others ) saw a Lancaster , a Panavia Tornado , and an F 35 (B ? ) flying in formation
My father was an armaments fitter on Lincoln's (amongst others) in the RAAF, 1948-58.
Did they rectify the small escape hatch that the Lancaster had and doomed so many of the crews when shot down?
Fascinating stuff Mr Nash
A criminally underrated aircraft IMO. Ironically the Shackleton - in some ways a shortened Lincoln - proved much more could be squeezed from the airframe, with her four *RR Griffon* engines turning contra-rotating propellers, complimented with two Viper turbojets.
Russia's postwar Tupolev Bear, certainly suggests that the Lincoln could have been developed further, in a more useful way than the *Boeing Washingtons* we had for a relativy short time, and - to the best of my knowledge - never carried nukes, which is what they were theoretically for.
And if you want to see an actual Lincoln, go to the RAF Museum at Cosford in England. You can also see two of the V-Bombers there too, a Vulcan and a Victor.
Superb museum. Lots of amazing prototypes. There is a Valiant there too, the only one left I believe. Excellent Cold War exhibition as well.
The Lincoln was not the last derivative of the Lancaster. The Shackleton first flew in 1949 and retired in 1991.
avtually the shackelton was a derivative of the lincoln itself.
He said "the final evolution of the MANCHESTER"
I like this a lot! And now, please please please, the final version of the Manchester-Lancaster-Lincoln - the Avro Shackleton? Please?
The origin of the Lincoln was the twin engine Avro Manchester (not ideal) which morphed in the four engined Lancaster (a HUGE success), then as the war neared the end, the LINCOLN materialised. Apart from the normal production run in the UK, Australia built 73 Lincolns at Fishermen's Bend (CAC -Commonwealth Aircraft Factory) Melbourne VIC..
At 8:37. Think, the picture shows MIG 17 not MIG 15
Yep. Wing fences.
What's the bubble on the bottom of the fuselage? Targeting radar? I suppose one could argue the next step in evolution was the Shackleton, though that was actually a marine patrol bomber.
The aircraft pictured @8:37 are MiG 17s. Still good video. And if Airfix puts a Lincoln kit out, I'll buy it without a second thought.
Oh! Good spot! Yes, I missed that. Too keen to get the video finished.
You should do the cargo transport version of the lancaster next :P
Known as the Avro York. One can be seen on static display at the Imperial War Museum, Duxford, Cambridgeshire.
Awesome that Someone with UK accent giving out specs in MPH and Feet which can understand while the American gives out specs in Metrics.
What school did you go to that didn’t teach both?
@@bop3752 An American Federally Funded Pubic school system. At the time the Inch system was the only system in this country, Which kept this country Great.
Hopefully you'll be doing a video about another development of the Lancaster- the Avro Lancastrian civil airliner built / converted in the UK and Canada.
STENDEC.
Cracking video as always. Looking forward to the next one
It would seem foolhardy to develop a Superfortress clone with the jet age at the door. There were about to be plenty of B29’s in storage as the B50 came on stream.
When I was a kid I used to see the shakelton flying over the north east coast on sub patrol. Didn't look outdated to me. It looked beautifully belligerent especially those two 20s sticking out of the front turret. Same stable, same quality. Too young to see a Lincoln unfortunately
Great job, Ed Nash!
I may have mentioned this on this channel before so apologies If I have, but I live in Chadderton, Oldham, about a mile from what used to be an Avro factory, don't know if these were built there? I know Lancaster's were, Sadly you wouldn't have any clue as to what the factory used to be if you didn't already know, I didn't for years, There's no sign or some kind of statue commemorating what used to be there, there should be.
Yes there should be and there was a makeshift one visible for years as I was growing up in the 60s and 70s. What was purported to be a Lancaster wing protruded northwards from a hangar halfway down Greengate. It would be interesting if anyone can verify this.
@@donquixote3927 I couldn't, my family before I was born in the mid 70's were mostly from Shaw and Fitton Hill, never ventured into this area, so I doubt they would know either. I know a neighbour in her 80's whose lived across the street in New Moston all her life, I could ask her.
Never heard of the Lincoln. An interesting development, and a very impressive greenhouse nose.
Assume it still used the Merlins?
BAE Lincoln page
www.baesystems.com/en/heritage/avro-694-lincoln
I worked on Lincons at Manby in 1958-59.
RAF Hemswell 1953-54. My father was an 83 squadron Lincoln rear gunner. Flew 20 sorties from RAF Tengah, Malaya. That followed his 40 operations as a Halifax rear gunner in 1944.
@@sirronnorris3343 I flew as as crew on several 6 hour flights. I spent most of the time on the rest bed just below the mid upper turret as my headset was duff. Happy days. Alan.
My old ATC commanding officer,flight lieutenant Ken Norman was a navigator on Lincoln’s and was part of the bomber force over Borneo.
I've been reading about World War ll since 1965, and I've Never Heard of This Model Until Now! That's how important channels like this are. Thank you for your excellent work and presentation, Ed Nash!