The fact that so many people call you brave for making this piece, is kinda sad. Do we have to worry about repercussions? Why are we living in a world where speaking this truth, is seen as brave? This should be normal!
@@eileenmacdougall8945like that sellout who had the opportunity to expose the truth but turned her back for a lucrative job i knew idiots like you would go around singing her praises (YEARS AGO)
They were still performing forced sterilizations on women in my home town of Madison Heights, Virginia when I was a young child (I’m in my early 50’s now). This was done at the Central Virginia Training Center (formerly Virginia State Colony for Epileptic and Feeble Minded). Ironically, at that young age, I believed we were a free people. I thought that even though women were having this done to them just a few miles from my family home.
Almost happened to my mother in the 1940s. They were trying to do it to Mexican American girls without consent. My mom's stepdad stopped it. I don't know all the details but glad he found out. That is why I know "population control" is real and nothing new. People need to do research before dismissing "conspiracy theorists."
It's not a reflection of western society, it's a reflection of human ignorance. Our societies are inherently good and noble, which is why we are so prosperous today. Blame the people, not the civilization.
Americans don't realize how thick, established, normal, and widespread the Eugenics movement was. The Eugenics philosophy (some called it that) was thought progressive in the early decades of the last century. I'm deaf in one ear so they probably woulda only took one of the fellas, and that's about how absurd the logic of Eugenics was
Not just eugenics. Academia as a whole was hijacked. The theory of evolution was just to write God out of history cuz at the time it was hard to justify messing with God's creation and still be considered ethical. They were trying to reanimated dead bodies with electricity like Frankenstein and trying to find the soul and swap consciousness between two subjects. They were doing some pretty weird stuff. It was all ethical if there was no God. But it was all unethical if there was even a chance there might be a creator.
It’s ironic that Churchill was a supporter of eugenics when one considers that he was both an alcoholic and a manic depressive. His father was also a syphilitic and his mother was noted for her loose morals. I guess eugenics did not apply to English upper classes?
It's only about 10% of the story. If you really think about societal systems in relation to selective reproduction you'll realise that all societies are inherently Eugenic.
to the title That is B.S.. the blame America and the Brits, by subversives who degrade, demoralize to destroy from the inside as well as outside. and I mean destroy. also white women were the ones who took the pill and had abortions, the others got paid per child more extortions off all the rest of us.
@@TPQ1980 Sounds like you're attempting to normalize white supremacy as natural or part of nature or of "god's will" or whatever which is, all due respect, crap. I guess if you're talking about individuals making deliberate decisions about whether or not or when to have kids which is just basic reproductive health freedom and that is entirely different than Eugenics. Eugenics is an explicitly white supremacist pseudo science that was intended to be, and unfortunately was all too often, public policy or law. Some of these laws are still around in the U.S.! And anti abortion fanatics, among other Fascists, are trying to put this insanity on life support!
@@TPQ1980 There is definitely a difference between natrual selection and believing that things like crime and homosexuality can be done away with, through controlled breeding. To believe you can eliminate poverty through forced-sterilization of the poor and just breed society into higher IQs or "greater moral character" is an incredibly dangerous set of premises. When IQ is already on shaky ground when it comes to understanding human intelligence. The validity of eugenics aside, it can easily turm into a thinly veiled excuse to grant the state immense power to set out on witch-hunts for the poor, marginalised and any other undesirables. Which often tends to be logical conclusion of eugenics. A notion of historical pre-modern eugenics would need to explain why practice medicine at all. Especially when humans have always sought cures to treat and care for their ill.
Churchill wasn't calling for the sterilisation of entire races, rather just of the disabled.. which is obviously wrong, however there's a difference between the kind of eugenics Hitler called for, and the kind Churchill backed. Needless to say, I do believe Britain would be better off without Churchill in power, he was offered peace deals but he wanted war.
Not ironic really. Eugenics, among other things, only became taboo after it was realised that the Nazis had put the idea into practice in such a draconian way. Before that, it was simply seen as a pragmatic theory.
Excellent video. In his book “I Knew Hitler” founding member of the NSDAP Kurt Lüdecke describes being sent by Hitler to meet Henry Ford in the 1920s - Ford’s influence on Nazi doctrine was so profound that Hitler expected Ford would bankroll his nascent political movement.
What? You think ford influenced the Nazis? You know that ford was repeating German anti Jewish propaganda. Even Karl Marx wrote about the early socialist all being anti Jewish in the 1849 communist manifesto. True socialism is philistine.
Only 30 seconds in, but the allies didn't punish a lot of the worst wrongdoers. There were some who were punished but a lot of them were snuck into the USA (primarily) or other countries and given top-level jobs in the government via Operation paperclip, same in Japan
@@RobespierreThePoof none of what you just said runs counter to my claims. Some Nazis were punished, some were given high paying jobs in the US and other countries and subsequently won national awards. Some of Germany denazified, but a lot of the Nazis who went to America helped America's war machine perpetuate their own genocides, and America has remained a genocidal nation. I didn't mention Germany; Germany was not part of the Allies
Operation Gladio as well, indeed Claus Barbie, the infamous Nazi known as the Butcher of Lyon was recruited into the CIA, the latter was formerly known as the OSS.
Punish? The wrongdoers? I'm sure you see yourself a moral superiority. Pride is a deadly sin, you pompous tool. Where is American punishment for all the countries it has laid to ruin, millions of people dead, children starving, lives wasted to misery? Where is their punishment?
Churchill only "hated" nazis because the movement started as working class. If it had continued to have Erich Ludendorff as a leader Churchill would have favoured it. It was the same situation with Italian fascism for the same reasons
Nazism most certainly did NOT start as working class. Like all movements on the far right, it was started by either the nation's upper bourgeoisie and aristocracy, or it started as a petty bourgeois movement that was then funded and backed by the upper bourgeoisie and aristocracy. The working class, at least in any significant capacity, is the last class to join such movements, and only after a thorough capital-backed propaganda campaign directed at them. That's the timeline of both Italian fascism and German fascism.
@Gordon_Freeman_PhD Nazism was indeed a grassroots movement and it would have never happened if not for the disastrous "peace" in the aftermath of WW1 with the treaty of Versailles that the Germans was basically held at gun point, blockeded an starved into taking sole responsibility for which was WRONG that even the British people sympathized with. After that Germany chopped up like a turkey and the economy decimated, Weimar Republic, rampant prostitution, drunkenness, hyperinflation etc you name it is what led to the rise of Nazism. If not for that you would have never known the name Hitler. An even then Hitler was having bloodless diplomatic victories which did get the big boys very concerned so much so that Britain inexplicably gave Poland that it knew it could not defend or save a war guarantee and because of that Poland refused to negotiate with Hitler even though Hitler surprisingly made some very fair and reasonable demands but because of the war guarantee Poland stubbornly refused to even talk to him thinking Britain will come to save them an that's when Hitler had enough an invaded Poland which caused Britain to declare war on Germany that it knew it could not win on its own which is why when Britain was getting their asses handed to them they had to come back sobbing and crying to the U.S (that it still owed war debt to After WW1) to save them again. There ain't just 1 villian in all these wars, there's plenty of blame to go around for all parties involved.
Yeah man your right about it really it was about how In 1996, Mars produced Christmas-themed advertisement for the candies in which the Red and Yellow characters run into Santa Claus on Christmas Eve. Similarly to competitor Hershey's own Christmas-themed commercial, the commercial proved immensely successful and has re-aired every December since that year, becoming their longest-running television commercial.
This is really good. "history is written by the victor" is one of those truisms people throw around without appreciating it's implications for us as victors!
No such thing as good guys. As an outsider im always amazed by the so called "allies". The US and its slavery of black people and genocide of its own natives, needs no explanation. A country that has been at war for more than a century in the name of "salvation" and "democracy". Always amusing watching America bomb some poor country to smithereens and come around crying about refugees flooding their borders. France with its own Genocides as well as numerous crimes in the African continent that are still being conducted to date. Belgium poor little Belgium, a country that directly oversaw the torture and death's of more than six million Congolese in some of the most brutal ways. Nowadays they scapegoat their former king and pretend they didn't know. How about Britain with its own massive war crimes and genocide across India and Africa. My own Grandfather was subject to torture from them. I don't really think anyone needs a history lesson on Stalins jaw dropping levels of the executions of his own people. Point is to me the allies were just as bad and in many cases much worse than their opponents which is saying a lot.
The "good" / "bad" dichotomy is a massive oversimplification of the world. If you really dig deeply into it, you'll find it's a lot less clear-cut with a lot of deception involved.
I'll throw a little gas on the fire. Margaret Sanger ( Founder of Planned Parenthood) was a eugenicist and exchanged letters with Goebbels on the subject--both on whom were on the same page. I'm agnostic on Pro-Life/Pro-Choice, but I love throwing that bit of history into a conversation when that conversation arises. I was in a management meeting at my company. I was a few minutes before ti started and the conversation started about a recent ruling. I just sat and listened and I then brought up the early history of Sanger and her position with eugenics...I was called a liar. I said it was easy to prove...just look it up. Someone called it up on the screen and the room got quiet. The meeting started and the steam got let out of the conversation.
I tend to get that also, so much isnt talked about that would make people open their eyes with the the Goverment. I wont say our Goverment because thats a lie, its the elite and goes back generational. They just got done doing Eugentics on the world, but because they did it thru fear noone will see it.
Here’s the thing tough Sangers personal position on eugenics doesn’t immediately discount abortion as healthcare it is no if about it there is nothing wrong with wanting a conversation about ethics in science but this isn’t the gotcha you conservatives think it is
Thank you for this video. In Sweden we had a very famous eugenics program too, and when i was in school my teatchers tried to tell me that we along with Nazi Germany were the only countries in the world with such a program. One of them even said that "Sweden is directly responsible for the holocaust." People just don't realize how uncontroversial and widespread this "science" was.
That doesn't mean our countries are inherently evil. It was the social understanding at the time, not the ethic in which our civilization is built off.
I have always said it is ironic how much USamericans hate Nazis so much but they have been just as bad, if not worst.. I am no stranger to this story, as a Honduran that researches honduran history once you get to the part involving the USA it all boils down to questions about race and "racial superiority" that USamericans used to reference to for such a long time when meddling in our economy, government and society.
Nazi inspired by America and gone a little bit too far. But the allies deflect all their sins toward Nazi. That the problem. All of that shit sweep under the rug after ww2. Even aryanism and nordicism is accepted as legit in academia. Nazi don't invented shit. Nazi is just new kids on the block that try to fit in but going too far.
Eugenics is only immoral when it is imposed without consent upon populations by states or other top-down power structures. Freely exercised by individuals, Eugenics is just consciously directed selective reproduction to produce a greater frequency of traits considered desirable, such as good health and high IQ.
Yes and we are heading down the same path. Look at the projects funded by Gates. And listen to Schwab speak. Not hard to picture a Nazi officer uniform on him. In fact that's the first thing that comes to mind.
Problem is the people don’t realise even though they are being told directly that they are from these evil bastards mouths, and don’t even know they are taking part in it Even though they should It’s like there’s a vale that covers it for the majority can’t see through but some do as the some are the normal people while the majority are just programmed robots or again very likely they just don’t give a sh1t
The sentiment didn't go anywhere. It's all over TH-cam and social media mainly in snarky responses like there's too many people on the planet and that certain people shouldn't have children - and nobody calls this out
They're being logical. Sentimentality or taking the easy option might give one a warm fuzzy feeling but it is disastrous when writ large across a whole nation or continent.
@@celtspeaksgoth7251 you like eugenics as long as you are identified as "fit to live". Concentrating that decision to a small group of racist degenerates puts humanity at greater risk than investing in accessibility resources for differently abled people.
@@celtspeaksgoth7251 Yeah.... not too long ago the Irish would have been on the eugenics chopping block Mr. Celt because they weren't considered to be White people. It's only logical...
@@celtspeaksgoth7251your logic would have killed Hawking, Nash, Bocelli etc. and spared some of the greatest monsters to ever exist. A good start doesn't allways result in a good human.
Marxism, Marx and many of his fellow Afroasiatics can be reasonably attributed with hundreds of millions of deaths in the 20th and 21st Centuries. The advances brought to the world by Europeans can be reasonable attributed with saving hundreds of millions of lives that would otherwise have been lost to malnutrition and treatable disease. Don't forget to say thank you to Europeans for saving so many human lives as afterall, you're not a "racist" who only cares about the lives of your people-group, right.
Operation Paperclip. Operation Pike. Read about the role of Vatikan in evacuating NAZIS. Watch a video about ukrainian SS "refugees" in Britain. Watch the queen doing nazi salutes. Read about the Munich agreement, the find an article on the BBC about Bank of England laundering nazi gold from czechoslovakia. Think why UNITED NATIONS CANNOT REMOVE !!! MONUMENTS TO NAZI COLLABORATORS!!! IN NEW YORK!!!
Well it really wasn’t until In the 1930s, Forrest Mars Sr., son of the Mars Company founder, Frank C. Mars, saw soldiers in the Spanish Civil War eating British-made Smarties. These are chocolate pellets with a colored shell of what confectioners call hard panning (essentially hardened sugar syrup) surrounding the outside, preventing the sweets (candies) from melting. Mars received a patent for his own process on March 3, 1941.
Operation Paperclip got America *_TO THE MOON!!_* America would have reached the moon sooner than the Soviets/Russians anyhow, but the scientists got the USA there much sooner!
Only fat, ugly and dumb people shudder at the thought of eugenics. We bread all other forms of animal like this to produce superior offspring, but for some reason in humans it could not possibly work and it is evil for some reeason.
"the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable." For the cringey try-hards who want to pretend that Eugenics is cool, its not cool simply because its mandated reproduction, and we just ARE NOT in a time where rhats necessary. Catch me on a Generational Colony Star Ship, and ill support Eugenics gladly. But not on Modern Earth 😂😂 I dont know if id call it EVIL Thats also pretty cringey virtue signalling, you didnt understand the assignment 😂 hate things because they're bad, not because they are "Nazi"
Yes this time it will the anti wax people that will percecuted just for wanting agency over their own body. Who is going to be responsible because they want to implement wax passports which would make it impossible for thos not wanting their wax to not be able to travel with public transport or travel abroad. Only time will tell if people will accept this or if they will make hell for these people. Funny enough how many said my body my choice regarding other medical intervention. I totally agree all the time my body my choice. If people will fail younger people will read the books and shake how could they be so evil and probably failling as well to be good when someone points out who should be the next victim.
It’s always been interesting to me how most abortion clinics in the USA are located in minority neighborhoods and communities. The USA does not publish statistics on abortion (strangely) but it’s been estimated that 80% of abortions are performed on minorities.
It’s just a matter of supply and demand, it’s located in minorities areas because they breed inconsequently way too much, if you can’t understand that, u r seriously stupid
I once looked at the stats for live birth rates for African Americans vs other ethnicities. They were comparable. For some reason conception rates are much higher. More sex? Less effective birth control?
Same with the rates of antipsychotic prescriptions used for Medicaid patients. Look that up. They're way over-medicating the poor. That's not just POC btw.
As a black former combat that you don’t know how much I appreciate and love how well documented this video is and I hope you continue to do more great work, and are recognized in the halls of history
In the words of Bob Marley, "Until there are no longer first and second class citizens of any nation, every where is war!" The history is damning and the present is also damning, what an amazing world it would be to be liberated from these confident but ignorant human leanings to scapegoat others. I got the first part of my comment wrong, that was Haile Selassi who said that, Bob just quoted him.
Everyone thought about eugenics in the early 20th Century including H.G. Wells. Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh admired Hitler. The image we have of him and before WW2 was created after the war to defend what the allies did. They portrayed themselves as heroes. That goes unquestioned now. I knew o,D veterans of WW2 includung my father who fought the Germans in Italy before being carried off the battlefield in Mar 25. My father had a far less heroic impression of Churchill and Montgomery. He thought they were pathetic poseurs. He was there. We weren’t.
It’s literally happening right now. There have been 20 million black babies aborted. By an organization started by one of the worst racists of the 20th century.
The ppl (Carnegie, Rockefellers) who funded Eugenics still are in control lol, in fact they are the people who created the modern medical industry, big pharma etc.
It is today, Darlin. puberty blockers are eugenics. if they can interrupt just 2%of this generation, it will slow population growth as effectively as wars have in the past.
Its alive and well in the new generation. Look how they despise people and think animals are better than people. The green agenda stems from eugenics, easy to prioritise climate over people when they don't see the value of life. Kids raised to believe evolution.
we must talk about the reality of US eugenics programs in public schools; I never realized how pervasive and popular it was until long after that period of my life
Eugenics was a terrible thing, and deserves to be admonished for its cruelty. But the fundamental ethic that undergirds our way of life is inherently good. Eugenics was an anomaly, not the norm.
Well, you can’t talk eugenics and you can’t talk public schools without talking about the Carnegies and the Rockefellers. And I have plenty of knowledge on them and public schools. which is exactly why they have little medical centers placed in high schools all over the country, trying to force our kids to take their shots
And renounced in the 60s by President Johnson in signing the Civil Rights Act. And then the fascist went to the Republican party where they exist and thrive even to this day.
@@willownighthawk9189et its Democrats passing CRT. Obama killed way more Muslims than Bush, and the Democrats that passed the crime bill to jail more black men.
Johnson was racist as Hell, more Republicans signed the 57 and 64 civil rights acts by percentage than Democrats. Johnson knew how to use blacks as a voting tool and democrats are still doing it today...
@@CoolFRYDAY History falsely portrayed him as short and having a complex because of it. He definitely didn’t get to write his own historical narrative.
Author George Orwell (pen name) who wrote 1984,Animal Farm etc always confused me because he was a self proclaimed left wing socialist but you definitely not think so when you read of his opinions of Irish people and in particular the idea of Irish independence, that is until I found out practically his whole family were British aristocracy and heavily involved in the eugenics movement which makes you think was he ever really a leftist at all
@shannonmchale 8494 yes he was , he even fought in Spanish civil war in the side of the communist ,founders of the first extermination camp in the World (Sevilla) he went back to England after being witness of the atrocities committed by the Socialist and Communist to their enemies and themselves ,communist and socialist had a love /hate relationship during that time
Eugenics was considered progressive and left wing during that time period. I think that's where you're confused. People who opposed eugenics policies were denounced as anti progress & religious fanatics.
Eugenics was a popular area in Western thought during the first half of the 20th century. Marie Stopes and John Maynard Keynes were both adherents to that dubious cause. Even Orwell thought somewhat along those lines during the early to mid 1930s.
@Smash-gs5kd I've read too much Marxist crap. Fabian socialists in particular were big fans of eugenics. Other socialists, like George Bernard Shaw, were openly public in their support.
@@spaceowl5957 The worldview of Nazi success was stolen from other cultures, also very successful. "Success" was always based on victory and greatly tipped scales of justice and economics. Hitler became Jesus for narcissistic mothers of America who sent their boys to fight him after some musing inapposite. Hitler almost won the hearts of America, in fact he did. That's the wreckage of success. Weltanschauung is original sin.
In Iζrεαl you can’t marry a Non J’ 3 ω . “Alternatively, genetic tests offer the possibility to legitimize those whose J’ 3 ωί5hñεςs is often questioned. For example, an Eastern European woman in Israel sought rabbinic permission to marry. ‘To bolster her claim for a marriage license, [she] … had her DNA analyzed’. The DNA test ‘tipped the balance in her favor’ and the ‘rabbi granted her a marriage license as a bona fide J’ 3 ω .
I remember reading a TH-cam comment under a video that was similar to this. Summarily, the comment said that the Holocaust was a result of European imperialism turned inwards onto itself. This comment really stuck with me because on reflection there are quite a few similarities in the rhetorics and practices of the historic institutionalisation of antisemitism and the imperial institutionalisation of racism à la colonialism and imperialism. For example, the ways in which Christian rhetoric was used to dehumanise the Jews and indigenous folk. Or the constant questioning of the effect of the presence of Jewish communities, and now immigrant communities, on the wellbeing/sanctity of the white community.
This video is insightful and extremely important for people to learn. Thank you so much for making this video. There’s so many people that would deny all of this. But when people look at you and hear your voice, it’s able to reach to certain members of the population that would otherwise ignore these truthful statements. And you ended the video on such a good note.
G. K. Chesterton warned us against this. Tesla was famous for many things, even things improperly ascribed to him. But most people were not aware of his endorsement of eugenics. He believed that by the year 2100 eugenics would be “universally established” as a system of weeding out undesirable people from the population. Tesla was hardly alone in believing this. Support for eugenics was one of the few things that people across political lines in the early 20th Century would agree on, from socialists like H.G. Wells to the Supreme Court of the United States to conservative Winston Churchill to libertarian science fiction writer Robert Heinlein. Several American states and European nations passed laws that sterilized those considered to have "undesirable" genes. Of course, it was Nazi Germany that expressed the logical end of the Eugenics movement - the INSANE desire for a pure race that ended in slaughter and death. Has anyone considered that we will soon have the technology to genetically modify life in the Womb before physical birth without killing? Once Gattaca comes, NO ABORTION WILL EVER BE NECESSARY.
@@rudijoris9555 Please forgive me if I have misunderstood. But genetically correcting people's genes should NOT be conflated with abortion. For example, a child could be cured of Down's Syndrome in utero and DEFINITLY LIVE a very good life.
Thomas Robert Malthus died in 1834, long before 1907. Knowing about his disdain for poor people and his plans to have poor people living in unhygienic conditions to cause illness and even worse living conditions and poverty on them, makes it easy to realize that eugenics, also called Malthusianism, stems from insane minds, or perhaps one should call it 'feebleminded people' (another term for 'the undesireables'). That "Churchill was using the sort of language that would later be used by the Nazis to describe those who failed to live up to the standards of the 'master race'" is no surprise. And what about Plato... Calling for 'cleansing of the gene pool' through execution, regarding the human race as a stock or a herd, shows clear insanity (Paul Popenoe). Eugenics is at best a "pseudo-science", founded on racism. The 'English-speaking race', as defined by Cecil Rhodes, seems to be quite defectous...
The irony is, that forcing a poor population to live in unhygienic conditions would actually lead to selective reproduction that would produce a higher frequency among the poor population for more effective immune systems, thus nullifying the original goal. Malthus had some interesting ideas, but he was wrong about many things.
How's that? ....... when Women from different cultures on average wanted to mate and have kids with a tall strong smart good looking Man with recourses isn't that eugenics? But it's embraced. When a Woman rejects a short unattractive broke Man that's nature's eugenics its called natural selection.............Politics and neoliberalism have messed up with people's minds.....
Not America that was, the Democratic Party was and is. They're the ones who supported it then and they still do today, which is why they push it now more than ever.
"You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free! " Jesus of Nazareth ( Who would have undoubtedly also been executed by Nazis, like many of his blessed family!)
@@jamessones4044I'm not quite sure what you mean, but many young people will have less fulfilled lives and be made unable to have children by premature and unwise medical treatment.
@@jamessones4044. I agree, if you mean how doctors are experimenting trying to transfer genders like they’re God; however, it’s one heck of a mess now. So many are now trying to revert, but for some it’s just too late. Their bodies are messed up by those who were lying to these kids. The trans activists can’t blame the straight parents who never wanted their child to “transition”, now that the child comes back jacked up!!🥺
Pretty absurd to tell this history while excluding discussion of abortion, given that the founder of Planned Parenthood was a eugenicist and that abortion continues the work of the eugenics movement today, with the vast majority of abortions being performed on minorities or otherwise underprivileged women.
The narrator is excellent. The story was vaguely known to me from research I tripped over whilst looking for other material, but this is a stupendous effort to write so little requires that one must write so much, and have researched even further back, to bring it into today - thank you for your effort and dedication in a ghoulish and dark area of history to have dealt with..
Excellent brave content. Thank you sharing these important facts to understand that the Na tsee party did not start from one day to another..or all of a sudden in situ. I was hoping to see a video after reading this seemly "sensitive" part of history in different languages, except English. Sweden was doing her part too in these eugenics "experiences", like sterilisation. You see, among all the Nordic countries, Sweden was where eugenics met with its greatest success. Up to 63,000 people, mostly women, were sterilised under a "racial purity" programme approved by the state until 1976. So while Sweden was not the only country to practise eugenics before the second world war, it was the first to set up a state institute for racial biology.The institute was founded in 1921 to identify "sexually precocious or mixed-race types", and legislation was enacted in 1934. Although sterilisation operations waned in the 1960s, the law was not repealed until 1976.
Denmark never seem to have stopped this - now, in the 21st Century they still "diagnose" 100% healthy, well educated and lovely people "mentally ill" and, kill - I no longer know how many - "for the fun of it" it seems 😱😰😱
These Nordic countries still practice eugenics by killing unborn babies, especially those that are believed to have down syndrome, autism, and other birth defects. They brag about how they've "cured" down syndrome yet they haven't done so, they've killed everyone that was believed to have it before they were even born. Just horrible. Those policies of forced sterilizations were happening in America at that time thanks to the Democratic Party and the same thing is happening today in the name of "gender affirming care."
It’s never gone away There have been 20 million black babies, murdered by Planned Parenthood, which was started by Margaret Sanger, who was just as much if not more of a racist than Hitler.
Eugenics never went away. How do you think dog breeds came into existence if not by conscious selective reproduction for inheritable traits? Have a think about how societal systems interact with reproductive choices and you'll soon realise that all societies are inherently Eugenic.
Many see Churchill still as a hero, not knowing that he and some others of the English aristocracy and oligarchy was one of the masterminds how to trick Germany into the First World War. The same “trick” used to trick Russia into the war. Churchill is therefore rather the driving force of the fall of the British Empire, without him wanting it of course. But he and his friends did not think of the consequences such a war with Germany and later in the Second World War against the Russians might have.
I had no idea how much of the eugenic idea had been put into place in the US. But I do know how much the general thinking of the time had to do with eugenics and the Nazi ideology. European and American scientists were very interested in finding differences in the brains (and intelligence) of different human "species". Trying to prove how much more advanced in terms of evolution, certain peoples were. Thus justifying colonization and subjugation of "lesser" human groups. This continued long after the end of world War two .
I agree. But I believe Darwin's original theory of evolution had to do with adaptability. He left the door open in terms of interpreting intelligence and power. The true test of intelligence is whether or not it helps groups adapt and survive. Although most of human history has been about one group dominating another Darwin pointed out that cooperation between groups was an essential element in the survival of humans as a species.
I disagree. While useful as a gloss this is a shallow treatment of a subject where generalizations are dangerous. Only if auditors learn more can the risks of a shallow understanding be ameliorated. I’d recommend starting with Edwin Black’s ‘War Against The Weak: Eugenics And America’s Campaign To Create A Master Race’.
@@nomdeguerre7265 yeah... 25 years ago that could be dismissed for the bad joke it is. Now politicians get elected pushing that " reverse racism ( white victimization ) / white genocide " narrative 💩.
Eugenic Centers have been renamed Planned Parenthood. If you notice almost all the Planned Parenthood centers are in Black low income locations. It's for a reason. I noticed he didn't mention Margret Sanger.
I continue to believe that man's greatest enemy is himself. Til we come to this realization we will continue to inflict great misery on both our-selves and each other. Be very careful about what you gift to the universe. One thing is certain. It may go around the block, but you can be certain it will return to knock on your door.
Most advocates of eugenics arent fit by their own standards. Himmler the head of the SS was a good example I am more fit then that little gremlin was but because I am Afro Latino Heinrich would say that I was inferior. Dude failed to get into the military had all kinds of health problems and wasnt all that bright. But because he came from a upper middle class background he had a high view of himself.
One thing that I've never been able to understand regarding the movement from the idea of artificial selection to its application to genetics is this whole idea of "breeding desirable characteristics", as if none of the scientists promoting this view ever had the sense to ask "Desirable to who?". If you look at even the most successful artificial selection campaigns, I don't think any scientist would claim those efforts made the animal "better". Is a bloodhound really better than a wolf? I mean...they are more docile and their sense of smell is better, but they are completely incapable of meeting the basic needs of survival without human assistance. We selected traits that were desirable to rabbit hunters, not ones that were desirable to the dogs. It stands to reason then that if a long running eugenics campaign ever actually got off the ground and was able to sustain itself for the several generations that would be required to have an effect, the same thing would come out of it, a population bred to suit the needs of the people who made the eugenics laws in the first place, probably not better, but likely more docile, better at being good worker bees, and more amenable to the aims of the people in power with less capability to control their own lives. It's effectively an attempt to domesticate humans, and I understand why that would be attractive to evil billionaires and autocrats, but what I don't understand is why that idea would be attractive to the middle class academics who promoted them in the first place.
Probably half the reason it's had, without pr spin, had less plain a presence among the people it's been applied to. It's neither with their general acceptance or will, nor for their benefit.
Though to answer your question, was actually, despite how some parts may look, actually either applied to all 'groups'? Because if it isn't, but made to look as if it is, then there may be a group among us that is applying it to all of us, that are not limited by funds is billionaire, but something more like a race, cult or something else. Something that bound them together to keep them focused on purpose that would lead there. Because there's no way it occured one day, just spontaneously with only a handful of people aware of such blatantly obvious questions as 'to who', who couldn't easily be fobbed off with verbose versions of 'just better'.
Along with Marie Stoups & Margaret Sanger London declared war on working class planned parenthood exported to US & came back across Atlantic practised in Germany on Industrial Scale
Stopes. Yet thousands of foetuses are aborted each day, all around us and no-one seems bothered. It's justified as the 'woman's right'. How is that different to the Nassis or Pol Pot or the Gulags or what China does to its minorities.
Thanks for the honesty. At last. As far as I am concerned, Great Britain engaged in extermination in the Southwestern part of Africa around the 18th century. France is doing the same ever so subtly today in Togo. The West, as a whole, needs to look at itself.
@@capeverdeanprincess4444Those countries aren’t part of “The West”. Maybe Argentina, definitely not Brazil and Colombia. They haven’t been stable enough for that title. The West is as follows. Most EU nations, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, and The UK
@@capeverdeanprincess4444 there's a long history of european colonization that everyone in this thread seems to have forgetten lol. But it makes much more sense to think about this in terms of the global North and the global south. The global North is the imperialist nations and the global south are the nations being colonized, neocolonized, and super exploited. Some of those nations become wanna be colonizers themselves like Japan.
The scariest bit about going deeper into history is that you realize that while the Nazis were exceptionally evil, they weren’t that exceptionally evil.
I think if you research the Fabian society... you'll find that Huxley, Churchill and others were trying to work on problems...but many of them bailed out when eugenics came on the table...brave new world by Huxley can be seen as a whistle blower piece of art...pretty complex topic you've attempted to encapsulate.
@@mikethebloodthirsty yeah he wrote brave new world revisited...if I remember correctly he retracted a few things and said he'd write a few things differently. I think it's difficult really, for us to judge in any reasonable way what would have been deemed Vanguard intellectual inquiry... however, it's irresponsible to try to make a connection between those individuals and Hitler...where would we be without Churchill... Churchill was a painter...so was Hitler...art shows the soul...there is no comparison. Hitler was strung out on coke, meth and barbiturates...no wonder he committed a horrendous act of hubris...mind boggling. Churchill was shouting till he was blue in the face prior to the second war... everyone was tired of war...but he saw it coming...that is undeniable.
Yes, the power elite of the 19th and 20th centuries were all doing the same things. Ironically, the Germans got to the "party" late and therefore did less than the others. Of course, to the victors go the spoils and the winners write the history books, so we have to be very measured and apply critical scrutiny to all information, as well as putting the acts of the past into their proper context in time. It's a mistake to judge the past by the prevailing moral standards of the present as the future may judge us as lacking too.
We should learn from out past, not try to forget it.. or we are bound to repeat it from our ignorance and assumtions that we know better without it. We should be alot more well aware of what happend, why it happend and how we can better deal with any of these problems.
Not only that but the United States was the leader in eugenics. And Hitler followed their studies and findings religiously. So basically America was pushing Eugenics (which was considered legit science back then). Hitler believed what they were saying, therefore believing that certain races were superior than others. So then essentially the United States played a pretty significant part in forming Hitlers ideology. Which he then used to justify his future actions. Then America talks ad nauseam about how horrible of a person Hitler was. While never taking responsibility for their own eugenics program or for their part in radicalizing Hitler. They never took responsibility for what happened with Ted Kaczynski ether. Or a lot of other really terrible things that they have done. All while being quick to point out everyone else’s “atrocities”. 🤔
What I always find interesting is that the more common argument against eugenics is that it is ineffective rather than immoral. What does it say about us that we care less for human rights and more for mechanical efficiency?
If you're not a sociopath, you already know why it's immoral. Unfortunately, far too many people in positions of power are not constrained by what we typically call a conscience, empathy or sympathy, so a utilitarian case should be made and included in the argument.
The video claims the ideas of some eugenicists are unethical, he does not claim that selective breading in humans in and of itself is evil or does not work. We bread all forms of animals for certain traits, why would it not be effective in humans.
Yeah I've heard this a lot, and it's forever disappointing to see how Winston Churchill is still held up as some kind of hero, here in Britain. If people knew more about him, they'd (hopefully) stop worshipping his image.
The 0.1% controls our history, the flow of information and what we’re allowed to consume intellectually on a massive scale globally. So because of this, there’s just so much important, relevant information that so many of us don’t know which makes it impossible to make informed decisions and opinions on past and current issues. “I want a nation of workers, not a nation of thinkers” -J.D Rockefeller (funded the general education board of America)
Ever since the big C started I haven’t stopped falling down the rabbit holes…. We really are truly living in the matrix. Nothing is changed. It’s just ramped up in technology now.
Was the BIG C an experiment, an accident, a psychosis. or just blind panic based on no real evidence of its harmfulness? Of course we know what the jab was, a golden opportunity.
Please remain strong my friend 🙏. The things that will come to light in the next few years are enough to send anyone into a corner with a paper bag. But it needs to happen so we can all learn from our mistakes.. in order for it to never happen again. ❤
You can read diary of the wives and see in the 1800s how these ideas flourished and went from husbandry to evolutionary mythology You can add teddy Roosevelt to this list it wasn't just democrats or liberals just like we see Rino/dino establishment today they existed then.
You can read a short or extended version of the 1830 Indian Removal Act and remember that women weren't allowed to vote or hold office at that time, either, not until 1920.
@@jasonbrown372 Huh? My point was its a good window into the homes of those elitist men and the changing beliefs and views of race of those times. Everyday life views of slaves went from communial care education helping to civilize to a lesser than human racist sub species who can't ever learn or improve and always needs to be managed
@@jasonbrown372 woman ran the household and that's where husbandry was excersized. The practice of farming and breeding animals. Ideas of Eugene's spread and People begin to be seen the same way. Before that they weren't seen that way.
The video claims the ideas of some eugenicists are unethical, he does not claim that selective breading in humans in and of itself is evil or does not work. We bread all forms of animals for certain traits, why would it not be effective in humans.
@@biteme8905 yeah I was just referring to the spread of ideas in who what where and how you can spot some its trail. Even before lye or darwin and his nephew created the language and dialogue this stuff was cooking in the minds of the French courts. You can follow the trail through teachers and how it flourished and even motives and driving forced behind is radical views and inspirations
I see,l thought because his great great great etc Grandfather was The Duke of Marlborough ( Sir John Churchill,the Victor of Blenheim) that Winston was the WW2 owner ,I'll have to Google that now and I'm also curious who owns it these days too,cheers.
I have given up waiting for all these superior beings to save the world. We will save the world instead. Don't wait for a psychopath, to do something you can do much better.
That's the trick. People tell you what "god" said, (such as those with dark skin being inferior), just to manipulate and get power. You are right. In the future, OUR future, such beliefs are going to have to be put where they actually belong, and given as much respect as any other story in the library.
Right, when Judeo-Christianity are very much White supremacist ideologies. Christianity is just a continuation of Western imperialism. Christianity is based on the West as savior and the non-West as the meek that need to suffer and give up their food, land, and resources to the granted people, the West. Today, the Jews are the new Nazis.
Its easy to judge people in history. They lived in a different time, with a different understanding of race and culture. We are still not done with the quest of understanding man and all our forms, the bell curve is the example of this.
The Bell curve simply depicts the distribution of IQ and the distribution, frequency or manifestation of other traits among populations. It's just a data tool, how it is used, like any tool, is dependant on the tool user. We should be wise not to imbue the tool with characteristics it doesn't possess.
@@TPQ1980 agree, I don't think it can be honestly used for bad things, it simply provides people with the fact of variables between people. Im not saying its simply nature, or nurture.
The fact that so many people call you brave for making this piece, is kinda sad. Do we have to worry about repercussions? Why are we living in a world where speaking this truth, is seen as brave? This should be normal!
I agree and it's up to everyone of us. Like Whitney Webb says, there's nothing left to lose.
Because we live in an Orwellian Society
@@eileenmacdougall8945like that sellout who had the opportunity to expose the truth but turned her back for a lucrative job i knew idiots like you would go around singing her praises (YEARS AGO)
This has been spoken about forever! Hes not the first..lol. We all know or should know by now if you wake up
@@denisemartin3603 traditional media and schools tend to bury this subject. So, most people doesn't know about it.
They were still performing forced sterilizations on women in my home town of Madison Heights, Virginia when I was a young child (I’m in my early 50’s now). This was done at the Central Virginia Training Center (formerly Virginia State Colony for Epileptic and Feeble Minded). Ironically, at that young age, I believed we were a free people. I thought that even though women were having this done to them just a few miles from my family home.
Almost happened to my mother in the 1940s. They were trying to do it to Mexican American girls without consent. My mom's stepdad stopped it. I don't know all the details but glad he found out. That is why I know "population control" is real and nothing new. People need to do research before dismissing "conspiracy theorists."
Amazing
It's not a reflection of western society, it's a reflection of human ignorance. Our societies are inherently good and noble, which is why we are so prosperous today. Blame the people, not the civilization.
Google Oliver Wendell Holmes eugencics
They are still doing it in Saskatchewan, Canada.
Americans don't realize how thick, established, normal, and widespread the Eugenics movement was. The Eugenics philosophy (some called it that) was thought progressive in the early decades of the last century. I'm deaf in one ear so they probably woulda only took one of the fellas, and that's about how absurd the logic of Eugenics was
It’s not all bad we’ve established that marrying cousins is in fact bad.
Also people should test if their family carries a fatal inherited disorder.
Still is
Not just eugenics. Academia as a whole was hijacked. The theory of evolution was just to write God out of history cuz at the time it was hard to justify messing with God's creation and still be considered ethical. They were trying to reanimated dead bodies with electricity like Frankenstein and trying to find the soul and swap consciousness between two subjects. They were doing some pretty weird stuff. It was all ethical if there was no God. But it was all unethical if there was even a chance there might be a creator.
Fauciband grady still work heavily in eugenics. Mrna vaccine was an eugenics experiment.
Actually they do.
It’s ironic that Churchill was a supporter of eugenics when one considers that he was both an alcoholic and a manic depressive. His father was also a syphilitic and his mother was noted for her loose morals. I guess eugenics did not apply to English upper classes?
Nothing ever does. ❤
Possibly the real reason the British chose liberalism in the end.
And his face was a good reason to advocate for eugenics 😂😂😂
@@aurelius5961The British started liberalism lol.
Was Churchill’s mother Jewish?
Finally. I’ve been trying to tell people about this for a long time. They all believe it about Hitler, but not the others
It's only about 10% of the story. If you really think about societal systems in relation to selective reproduction you'll realise that all societies are inherently Eugenic.
to the title That is B.S.. the blame America and the Brits, by subversives who degrade, demoralize to destroy from the inside as well as outside. and I mean destroy. also white women were the ones who took the pill and had abortions, the others got paid per child more extortions off all the rest of us.
@@TPQ1980 Sounds like you're attempting to normalize white supremacy as natural or part of nature or of "god's will" or whatever which is, all due respect, crap. I guess if you're talking about individuals making deliberate decisions about whether or not or when to have kids which is just basic reproductive health freedom and that is entirely different than Eugenics. Eugenics is an explicitly white supremacist pseudo science that was intended to be, and unfortunately was all too often, public policy or law. Some of these laws are still around in the U.S.! And anti abortion fanatics, among other Fascists, are trying to put this insanity on life support!
The Nazs chose to massacre Jews. They were responsible for their decision to do so, and no one else.
@@TPQ1980 There is definitely a difference between natrual selection and believing that things like crime and homosexuality can be done away with, through controlled breeding. To believe you can eliminate poverty through forced-sterilization of the poor and just breed society into higher IQs or "greater moral character" is an incredibly dangerous set of premises. When IQ is already on shaky ground when it comes to understanding human intelligence.
The validity of eugenics aside, it can easily turm into a thinly veiled excuse to grant the state immense power to set out on witch-hunts for the poor, marginalised and any other undesirables. Which often tends to be logical conclusion of eugenics.
A notion of historical pre-modern eugenics would need to explain why practice medicine at all. Especially when humans have always sought cures to treat and care for their ill.
Churchills involvement in eugenics and his role in the WWII is quite ironic
Not the least bit surprised!
Churchill wasn't calling for the sterilisation of entire races, rather just of the disabled.. which is obviously wrong, however there's a difference between the kind of eugenics Hitler called for, and the kind Churchill backed.
Needless to say, I do believe Britain would be better off without Churchill in power, he was offered peace deals but he wanted war.
Winston Churchill was a DEMONCRATE
'Democrat'
Not ironic really. Eugenics, among other things, only became taboo after it was realised that the Nazis had put the idea into practice in such a draconian way. Before that, it was simply seen as a pragmatic theory.
Excellent video. In his book “I Knew Hitler” founding member of the NSDAP Kurt Lüdecke describes being sent by Hitler to meet Henry Ford in the 1920s - Ford’s influence on Nazi doctrine was so profound that Hitler expected Ford would bankroll his nascent political movement.
What? You think ford influenced the Nazis? You know that ford was repeating German anti Jewish propaganda. Even Karl Marx wrote about the early socialist all being anti Jewish in the 1849 communist manifesto. True socialism is philistine.
Only 30 seconds in, but the allies didn't punish a lot of the worst wrongdoers. There were some who were punished but a lot of them were snuck into the USA (primarily) or other countries and given top-level jobs in the government via Operation paperclip, same in Japan
Because in court(after the war) it was proven a doctor was present during the killings , making it legal.
@@RobespierreThePoof none of what you just said runs counter to my claims. Some Nazis were punished, some were given high paying jobs in the US and other countries and subsequently won national awards. Some of Germany denazified, but a lot of the Nazis who went to America helped America's war machine perpetuate their own genocides, and America has remained a genocidal nation. I didn't mention Germany; Germany was not part of the Allies
Simply put, Germany lost not the Nazis.
Operation Gladio as well, indeed Claus Barbie, the infamous Nazi known as the Butcher of Lyon was recruited into the CIA, the latter was formerly known as the OSS.
Punish? The wrongdoers? I'm sure you see yourself a moral superiority. Pride is a deadly sin, you pompous tool. Where is American punishment for all the countries it has laid to ruin, millions of people dead, children starving, lives wasted to misery? Where is their punishment?
Churchill only "hated" nazis because the movement started as working class. If it had continued to have Erich Ludendorff as a leader Churchill would have favoured it. It was the same situation with Italian fascism for the same reasons
Nazism most certainly did NOT start as working class.
Like all movements on the far right, it was started by either the nation's upper bourgeoisie and aristocracy, or it started as a petty bourgeois movement that was then funded and backed by the upper bourgeoisie and aristocracy.
The working class, at least in any significant capacity, is the last class to join such movements, and only after a thorough capital-backed propaganda campaign directed at them.
That's the timeline of both Italian fascism and German fascism.
@@Gordon_Freeman_PhD NSDAP national socialist german workers party
@Gordon_Freeman_PhD Nazism was indeed a grassroots movement and it would have never happened if not for the disastrous "peace" in the aftermath of WW1 with the treaty of Versailles that the Germans was basically held at gun point, blockeded an starved into taking sole responsibility for which was WRONG that even the British people sympathized with. After that Germany chopped up like a turkey and the economy decimated, Weimar Republic, rampant prostitution, drunkenness, hyperinflation etc you name it is what led to the rise of Nazism. If not for that you would have never known the name Hitler. An even then Hitler was having bloodless diplomatic victories which did get the big boys very concerned so much so that Britain inexplicably gave Poland that it knew it could not defend or save a war guarantee and because of that Poland refused to negotiate with Hitler even though Hitler surprisingly made some very fair and reasonable demands but because of the war guarantee Poland stubbornly refused to even talk to him thinking Britain will come to save them an that's when Hitler had enough an invaded Poland which caused Britain to declare war on Germany that it knew it could not win on its own which is why when Britain was getting their asses handed to them they had to come back sobbing and crying to the U.S (that it still owed war debt to After WW1) to save them again. There ain't just 1 villian in all these wars, there's plenty of blame to go around for all parties involved.
@@Gordon_Freeman_PhDyes it did, if not for the treaty of Versailles there would have been no Nazism.
Yeah man your right about it
really it was about how In 1996, Mars produced Christmas-themed advertisement for the candies in which the Red and Yellow characters run into Santa Claus on Christmas Eve. Similarly to competitor Hershey's own Christmas-themed commercial, the commercial proved immensely successful and has re-aired every December since that year, becoming their longest-running television commercial.
There were huge fascist parties in both the US and the UK prior to the war. Those people did not vanish.
No, they just relabeled themselves as conservatives and republicans.
This is really good. "history is written by the victor" is one of those truisms people throw around without appreciating it's implications for us as victors!
The story of the hunt always, invariably, glorifies the hunter
You're not a Victor
@@krugerfuchs were merely the slaves of the victors
No it’s “history is written by people who can write”
Not anymore that is not hold true in this information age😊
He got literally every idea from the “good guys”
No such thing as good guys. As an outsider im always amazed by the so called "allies". The US and its slavery of black people and genocide of its own natives, needs no explanation. A country that has been at war for more than a century in the name of "salvation" and "democracy". Always amusing watching America bomb some poor country to smithereens and come around crying about refugees flooding their borders.
France with its own Genocides as well as numerous crimes in the African continent that are still being conducted to date. Belgium poor little Belgium, a country that directly oversaw the torture and death's of more than six million Congolese in some of the most brutal ways. Nowadays they scapegoat their former king and pretend they didn't know.
How about Britain with its own massive war crimes and genocide across India and Africa. My own Grandfather was subject to torture from them. I don't really think anyone needs a history lesson on Stalins jaw dropping levels of the executions of his own people. Point is to me the allies were just as bad and in many cases much worse than their opponents which is saying a lot.
The "good" / "bad" dichotomy is a massive oversimplification of the world. If you really dig deeply into it, you'll find it's a lot less clear-cut with a lot of deception involved.
There were no good guys, FDR sent men to die for Stalin.
Hot take: There are no "good guys" during WW2. Only bad guys.
@@Arbelot There is nothing good about a binary view of history: there are no "bad" guys and "good" guys, there only winners and losers
I'll throw a little gas on the fire. Margaret Sanger ( Founder of Planned Parenthood) was a eugenicist and exchanged letters with Goebbels on the subject--both on whom were on the same page. I'm agnostic on Pro-Life/Pro-Choice, but I love throwing that bit of history into a conversation when that conversation arises. I was in a management meeting at my company. I was a few minutes before ti started and the conversation started about a recent ruling. I just sat and listened and I then brought up the early history of Sanger and her position with eugenics...I was called a liar. I said it was easy to prove...just look it up. Someone called it up on the screen and the room got quiet. The meeting started and the steam got let out of the conversation.
I tend to get that also, so much isnt talked about that would make people open their eyes with the the Goverment. I wont say our Goverment because thats a lie, its the elite and goes back generational. They just got done doing Eugentics on the world, but because they did it thru fear noone will see it.
@@norikofu509 Who and what are you questioning?
They can't stand the truth. Messes up their "progress."
Planned Parenthood would definitely want to hide this part pf their history.
Here’s the thing tough Sangers personal position on eugenics doesn’t immediately discount abortion as healthcare it is no if about it there is nothing wrong with wanting a conversation about ethics in science but this isn’t the gotcha you conservatives think it is
Thank you for this video. In Sweden we had a very famous eugenics program too, and when i was in school my teatchers tried to tell me that we along with Nazi Germany were the only countries in the world with such a program. One of them even said that "Sweden is directly responsible for the holocaust." People just don't realize how uncontroversial and widespread this "science" was.
We’re the Sami ppl the only who were sterilized, or disabled ppl too
Sweden will be a Muslim country in 25 years, so you don't have to worry about it.And will be a third world country.
Yes this is the danger when people accept “The Science” while suppressing
“Science”
That doesn't mean our countries are inherently evil. It was the social understanding at the time, not the ethic in which our civilization is built off.
@@DestinyAwaits19 Yes they are evil, America and Britian are worse than Nazi German y
I have always said it is ironic how much USamericans hate Nazis so much but they have been just as bad, if not worst.. I am no stranger to this story, as a Honduran that researches honduran history once you get to the part involving the USA it all boils down to questions about race and "racial superiority" that USamericans used to reference to for such a long time when meddling in our economy, government and society.
Indeed.
Another thing, your country has one of the highest if not the highest violent crime rate.
The U.S Don't hate N#t zees, they took thousands of evil, top SS officers in after WW2 and gsve them top jobs, as did Canada and the U.K.
The US ain’t as bad as Nazi germany, not even close.
Nazi inspired by America and gone a little bit too far. But the allies deflect all their sins toward Nazi. That the problem. All of that shit sweep under the rug after ww2. Even aryanism and nordicism is accepted as legit in academia. Nazi don't invented shit. Nazi is just new kids on the block that try to fit in but going too far.
Do people realize that Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab just love eugenics?
Gates parents loved it also.
@@derrick9635What? Planned parenthood? Bill Gates talks openly about that.
Eugenics is only immoral when it is imposed without consent upon populations by states or other top-down power structures. Freely exercised by individuals, Eugenics is just consciously directed selective reproduction to produce a greater frequency of traits considered desirable, such as good health and high IQ.
Yes and we are heading down the same path. Look at the projects funded by Gates. And listen to Schwab speak. Not hard to picture a Nazi officer uniform on him. In fact that's the first thing that comes to mind.
Problem is the people don’t realise even though they are being told directly that they are from these evil bastards mouths, and don’t even know they are taking part in it
Even though they should
It’s like there’s a vale that covers it for the majority can’t see through but some do as the some are the normal people while the majority are just programmed robots or again very likely they just don’t give a sh1t
The sentiment didn't go anywhere. It's all over TH-cam and social media mainly in snarky responses like there's too many people on the planet and that certain people shouldn't have children - and nobody calls this out
Certain people shouldn't have children-- child abusers and child killers for example.
They're being logical.
Sentimentality or taking the easy option might give one a warm fuzzy feeling but it is disastrous when writ large across a whole nation or continent.
@@celtspeaksgoth7251 you like eugenics as long as you are identified as "fit to live". Concentrating that decision to a small group of racist degenerates puts humanity at greater risk than investing in accessibility resources for differently abled people.
@@celtspeaksgoth7251 Yeah.... not too long ago the Irish would have been on the eugenics chopping block Mr. Celt because they weren't considered to be White people. It's only logical...
@@celtspeaksgoth7251your logic would have killed Hawking, Nash, Bocelli etc. and spared some of the greatest monsters to ever exist. A good start doesn't allways result in a good human.
0:11 You forgot the Roma/Gypsies, around 800,000 died, not a small number that you can gloss over.
12:29 Forced sterilisation in iζrαεl…
“Forced contraception of J’ 3 ω5h Ethopian women is tip of global iceberg” …The Guardian .
60 million natives in the US , the biggest genocide in human kind by the hand of humans
He said "including" not "comprising of"
And he included Slavs, which is rare in the west. Despite the fact more Slavs were killed than Jews.
Marxism, Marx and many of his fellow Afroasiatics can be reasonably attributed with hundreds of millions of deaths in the 20th and 21st Centuries. The advances brought to the world by Europeans can be reasonable attributed with saving hundreds of millions of lives that would otherwise have been lost to malnutrition and treatable disease. Don't forget to say thank you to Europeans for saving so many human lives as afterall, you're not a "racist" who only cares about the lives of your people-group, right.
And sinti
I had no idea Britain OR America played a hand in it nor did I know how bad it was in America. Damn...
It should’ve been expected considering Americans literally thought of Africans as slaves. Nothing surprising
Operation Paperclip. Operation Pike.
Read about the role of Vatikan in evacuating NAZIS. Watch a video about ukrainian SS "refugees" in Britain. Watch the queen doing nazi salutes. Read about the Munich agreement, the find an article on the BBC about Bank of England laundering nazi gold from czechoslovakia.
Think why UNITED NATIONS CANNOT REMOVE !!! MONUMENTS TO NAZI COLLABORATORS!!! IN NEW YORK!!!
@@YourRealPadreuntil 1865 at least
Well it really wasn’t until In the 1930s, Forrest Mars Sr., son of the Mars Company founder, Frank C. Mars, saw soldiers in the Spanish Civil War eating British-made Smarties. These are chocolate pellets with a colored shell of what confectioners call hard panning (essentially hardened sugar syrup) surrounding the outside, preventing the sweets (candies) from melting. Mars received a patent for his own process on March 3, 1941.
Canada played a huge role in it too.
For those of you unaware, we are currently in the midst of the greatest eugenics push in human history
I heard other people say this. This idea never went away. It just went underground.
How do?
Sperm donor clinics and abortion clinics?
@@karencloskey7147 Add gender affirming care and vaccination.
@@karencloskey7147war, abortions, drugs, crime, poverty, covid, covid shots, big pharma etc... Climate change hoax coming fast
Operation Paperclip ensured those ideas never died...
And Gladio, Surgeon 🇬🇧, and Canada harbouring Ukrainian Nazi collaborators.
Even without operation paperclip those ideas wouldn't have died considering Nazi eugenics was heavily influenced by the US and Britain.
Operation Paperclip got America *_TO THE MOON!!_* America would have reached the moon sooner than the Soviets/Russians anyhow, but the scientists got the USA there much sooner!
Glad you brought up Old GK. He wrote Eugenics and Other Evils right after WW1 and was beginning to see the serious rise of eugenic thought in society.
What's wrong with eugenics?
And the world benefits from it today
Only fat, ugly and dumb people shudder at the thought of eugenics. We bread all other forms of animal like this to produce superior offspring, but for some reason in humans it could not possibly work and it is evil for some reeason.
"the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable."
For the cringey try-hards who want to pretend that Eugenics is cool, its not cool simply because its mandated reproduction, and we just ARE NOT in a time where rhats necessary.
Catch me on a Generational Colony Star Ship, and ill support Eugenics gladly. But not on Modern Earth 😂😂
I dont know if id call it EVIL
Thats also pretty cringey virtue signalling, you didnt understand the assignment 😂 hate things because they're bad, not because they are "Nazi"
@@konyvnyelv.if you have to ask that, you’ve got a problem already.
We’ve learned nothing from this, I see all the divisions among people today and see the seeds of this to bear dark fruit very soon.
Forced sterilisation in iςrαεl…
“Forced contraception of J’3ω5h Ethopian women is tip of global iceberg” …The Guardian .
Yes this time it will the anti wax people that will percecuted just for wanting agency over their own body. Who is going to be responsible because they want to implement wax passports which would make it impossible for thos not wanting their wax to not be able to travel with public transport or travel abroad. Only time will tell if people will accept this or if they will make hell for these people. Funny enough how many said my body my choice regarding other medical intervention. I totally agree all the time my body my choice. If people will fail younger people will read the books and shake how could they be so evil and probably failling as well to be good when someone points out who should be the next victim.
Ignorance has stopped anyone from having a curious mind!!!
@@REwing or apathy. I feel there is very much lack of passion today.
Either you're with them, or against them.
It’s always been interesting to me how most abortion clinics in the USA are located in minority neighborhoods and communities. The USA does not publish statistics on abortion (strangely) but it’s been estimated that 80% of abortions are performed on minorities.
It’s just a matter of supply and demand, it’s located in minorities areas because they breed inconsequently way too much, if you can’t understand that, u r seriously stupid
I rejoice in that
I once looked at the stats for live birth rates for African Americans vs other ethnicities. They were comparable. For some reason conception rates are much higher. More sex? Less effective birth control?
Same with the rates of antipsychotic prescriptions used for Medicaid patients. Look that up. They're way over-medicating the poor. That's not just POC btw.
Planned Parenthood was originally called 'The Negro Project'.
As a black former combat that you don’t know how much I appreciate and love how well documented this video is and I hope you continue to do more great work, and are recognized in the halls of history
"The allies themselves are doing what we are fighting the Germans for..."
No, there is a huge difference between sterilising mentally retarded people and murdering 6 million innocent people.
Once people understand the role of bankers in wars it all makes sense.
@@ReasonAboveEverything the British financial elite bet on the war
@@ReasonAboveEverythingwhy do bankers do what they do?
I haven't seen any evidence of these kind of crap going on in Soviet Union!
In the words of Bob Marley, "Until there are no longer first and second class citizens of any nation, every where is war!" The history is damning and the present is also damning, what an amazing world it would be to be liberated from these confident but ignorant human leanings to scapegoat others. I got the first part of my comment wrong, that was Haile Selassi who said that, Bob just quoted him.
That was hailli selassi who said that. Bob just quoted him.
@@karlbyrne6021Sounds very marxist.
@@karlbyrne6021 I didn't know that, thanks for putting me straight!
@@jameswilson313 Jesus sounded Marxist as well in case you missed it, but he couldn't have been so could he? :) Are you an American by any chance?
Wasn't Bob Marley a singer? Why should we listen to his view above others?
Everyone thought about eugenics in the early 20th Century including H.G. Wells. Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh admired Hitler. The image we have of him and before WW2 was created after the war to defend what the allies did. They portrayed themselves as heroes. That goes unquestioned now. I knew o,D veterans of WW2 includung my father who fought the Germans in Italy before being carried off the battlefield in Mar 25. My father had a far less heroic impression of Churchill and Montgomery. He thought they were pathetic poseurs. He was there. We weren’t.
It’s incredibly scary how recent this was in our history
It’s literally happening right now. There have been 20 million black babies aborted. By an organization started by one of the worst racists of the 20th century.
More scary is that people who believed in this are still alive many of them are in age of 50 to 60
The ppl (Carnegie, Rockefellers) who funded Eugenics still are in control lol, in fact they are the people who created the modern medical industry, big pharma etc.
It is today, Darlin. puberty blockers are eugenics. if they can interrupt just 2%of this generation, it will slow population growth as effectively as wars have in the past.
Its alive and well in the new generation. Look how they despise people and think animals are better than people. The green agenda stems from eugenics, easy to prioritise climate over people when they don't see the value of life. Kids raised to believe evolution.
we must talk about the reality of US eugenics programs in public schools; I never realized how pervasive and popular it was until long after that period of my life
Eugenics was a terrible thing, and deserves to be admonished for its cruelty. But the fundamental ethic that undergirds our way of life is inherently good. Eugenics was an anomaly, not the norm.
Well, you can’t talk eugenics and you can’t talk public schools without talking about the Carnegies and the Rockefellers. And I have plenty of knowledge on them and public schools. which is exactly why they have little medical centers placed in high schools all over the country, trying to force our kids to take their shots
He left out one major bit. The racist laws were thought up and passed by the Democrats in the south and north.
And renounced in the 60s by President Johnson in signing the Civil Rights Act. And then the fascist went to the Republican party where they exist and thrive even to this day.
@@willownighthawk9189 incorrect
@@David-mj7yj you're incorrect. I'm 70 and lived through Jim Crow.
@@willownighthawk9189et its Democrats passing CRT. Obama killed way more Muslims than Bush, and the Democrats that passed the crime bill to jail more black men.
Johnson was racist as Hell, more Republicans signed the 57 and 64 civil rights acts by percentage than Democrats. Johnson knew how to use blacks as a voting tool and democrats are still doing it today...
I knew about it though.
Still "History is written by the winners"
Corbett Report. 😌👍
So Napoleon Bonaparte was a Winner
@@CoolFRYDAY No, he made history.
But he didn't decided what was written about him and how he was portrayed.
@@CoolFRYDAY History falsely portrayed him as short and having a complex because of it. He definitely didn’t get to write his own historical narrative.
12:29 Forced sterilisation in iζrαεl…
“Forced contraception of J’ 3 ω5h Ethopian women is tip of global iceberg” …The Guardian .
Wtf do you think Planned Parenthood is? And what about Woodrow Wilson?
People like to imagine that radical evil comes out of a single sick mind. It does not manifest from a vacuum.
Author George Orwell (pen name) who wrote 1984,Animal Farm etc always confused me because he was a self proclaimed left wing socialist but you definitely not think so when you read of his opinions of Irish people and in particular the idea of Irish independence, that is until I found out practically his whole family were British aristocracy and heavily involved in the eugenics movement which makes you think was he ever really a leftist at all
Socialists are the ultimate eugenecists. Fascism is just forced socialism. It's all the same oppression of individual independence and expression.
So basically the no “true” socialism fallacy. 🤥
@shannonmchale 8494 yes he was , he even fought in Spanish civil war in the side of the communist ,founders of the first extermination camp in the World (Sevilla) he went back to England after being witness of the atrocities committed by the Socialist and Communist to their enemies and themselves ,communist and socialist had a love /hate relationship during that time
Eugenics was considered progressive and left wing during that time period. I think that's where you're confused.
People who opposed eugenics policies were denounced as anti progress & religious fanatics.
Many leftists of the time would not be considered leftists by today's standards.
Eugenics was a popular area in Western thought during the first half of the 20th century. Marie Stopes and John Maynard Keynes were both adherents to that dubious cause. Even Orwell thought somewhat along those lines during the early to mid 1930s.
proof that orwell supported eugenics? I could not find anything on this
Eugenics was a popular idea among progressives and socialists, much as the trans craze is today.
we need more disabled ppl!
@Smash-gs5kd I've read too much Marxist crap. Fabian socialists in particular were big fans of eugenics. Other socialists, like George Bernard Shaw, were openly public in their support.
th-cam.com/video/hQvsf2MUKRQ/w-d-xo.html
What about the role of American Margaret Sanger's role in eugenics movement? 😮
Her organization is literally still murdering people
Yeah. Her absence is conspicuous. I was watching the video waiting to hear her name the entire time.
I was also waiting to hear her name, Sanger was extremely racist. Spoke to groups of the KKK.
The Swede, Josef Keller, played an important role in formulating Hitler's beliefs- Welt Anschauung-world struggle.
Weltanschauung means world view
@@spaceowl5957 The worldview of Nazi success was stolen from other cultures, also very successful. "Success" was always based on victory and greatly tipped scales of justice and economics. Hitler became Jesus for narcissistic mothers of America who sent their boys to fight him after some musing inapposite. Hitler almost won the hearts of America, in fact he did. That's the wreckage of success. Weltanschauung is original sin.
The world view of struggle, taken from everyday life, to nations against nations.
I think you mean Rudolf Kjellén, but yes, if you mean him it's correct.
In Iζrεαl you can’t marry a Non J’ 3 ω .
“Alternatively, genetic tests offer the possibility to legitimize those whose J’ 3 ωί5hñεςs is often questioned. For example, an Eastern European woman in Israel sought rabbinic permission to marry. ‘To bolster her claim for a marriage license, [she] … had her DNA analyzed’.
The DNA test ‘tipped the balance in her favor’ and the ‘rabbi granted her a marriage license as a bona fide J’ 3 ω .
I remember reading a TH-cam comment under a video that was similar to this. Summarily, the comment said that the Holocaust was a result of European imperialism turned inwards onto itself.
This comment really stuck with me because on reflection there are quite a few similarities in the rhetorics and practices of the historic institutionalisation of antisemitism and the imperial institutionalisation of racism à la colonialism and imperialism. For example, the ways in which Christian rhetoric was used to dehumanise the Jews and indigenous folk. Or the constant questioning of the effect of the presence of Jewish communities, and now immigrant communities, on the wellbeing/sanctity of the white community.
Simple, when Hitler saw his first british "person" he said "we can't let human turn into that".
Cringe
😂
This video is insightful and extremely important for people to learn. Thank you so much for making this video. There’s so many people that would deny all of this. But when people look at you and hear your voice, it’s able to reach to certain members of the population that would otherwise ignore these truthful statements. And you ended the video on such a good note.
G. K. Chesterton warned us against this. Tesla was famous for many things, even things improperly ascribed to him. But most people were not aware of his endorsement of eugenics. He believed that by the year 2100 eugenics would be “universally established” as a system of weeding out undesirable people from the population.
Tesla was hardly alone in believing this. Support for eugenics was one of the few things that people across political lines in the early 20th Century would agree on, from socialists like H.G. Wells to the Supreme Court of the United States to conservative Winston Churchill to libertarian science fiction writer Robert Heinlein. Several American states and European nations passed laws that sterilized those considered to have "undesirable" genes. Of course, it was Nazi Germany that expressed the logical end of the Eugenics movement - the INSANE desire for a pure race that ended in slaughter and death.
Has anyone considered that we will soon have the technology to genetically modify life in the Womb before physical birth without killing?
Once Gattaca comes, NO ABORTION WILL EVER BE NECESSARY.
Lol,at it’s fundamental level eugenics and abortion are the same thing. Get rid of what is not desirable.
@@rudijoris9555 Please forgive me if I have misunderstood. But genetically correcting people's genes should NOT be conflated with abortion. For example, a child could be cured of Down's Syndrome in utero and DEFINITLY LIVE a very good life.
Progressive democrats were the source of many of the Nazis ideas about eugenics. Democrats in the US are the architects of the eugenics ideology
You seem perhaps a bit presumptuous with respect to deciding what is the truth. 😂
Thomas Robert Malthus died in 1834, long before 1907. Knowing about his disdain for poor people and his plans to have poor people living in unhygienic conditions to cause illness and even worse living conditions and poverty on them, makes it easy to realize that eugenics, also called Malthusianism, stems from insane minds, or perhaps one should call it 'feebleminded people' (another term for 'the undesireables').
That "Churchill was using the sort of language that would later be used by the Nazis to describe those who failed to live up to the standards of the 'master race'" is no surprise. And what about Plato...
Calling for 'cleansing of the gene pool' through execution, regarding the human race as a stock or a herd, shows clear insanity (Paul Popenoe).
Eugenics is at best a "pseudo-science", founded on racism. The 'English-speaking race', as defined by Cecil Rhodes, seems to be quite defectous...
The irony is, that forcing a poor population to live in unhygienic conditions would actually lead to selective reproduction that would produce a higher frequency among the poor population for more effective immune systems, thus nullifying the original goal. Malthus had some interesting ideas, but he was wrong about many things.
America is truly sick, but thank you for telling the truth!
How's that? ....... when Women from different cultures on average wanted to mate and have kids with a tall strong smart good looking Man with recourses isn't that eugenics? But it's embraced.
When a Woman rejects a short unattractive broke Man that's nature's eugenics its called natural selection.............Politics and neoliberalism have messed up with people's minds.....
Not America that was, the Democratic Party was and is. They're the ones who supported it then and they still do today, which is why they push it now more than ever.
I have the utmost respect for you brother for telling these stories.
It's not that I am not aware of this, but when the story is spoken by a nativ Brit then all I can say is THANK YOU..
Thanks for having the guts to share this video...amazing how entwined diverse histories can be!
Your seeing eugenics in the trans movement.
"You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free! "
Jesus of Nazareth
( Who would have undoubtedly also been executed by Nazis, like many of his blessed family!)
@@jamessones4044I'm not quite sure what you mean, but many young people will have less fulfilled lives and be made unable to have children by premature and unwise medical treatment.
@@jamessones4044you mean because a complete transition plus hormone therapy will render them sterile?
@@jamessones4044. I agree, if you mean how doctors are experimenting trying to transfer genders like they’re God; however, it’s one heck of a mess now. So many are now trying to revert, but for some it’s just too late. Their bodies are messed up by those who were lying to these kids. The trans activists can’t blame the straight parents who never wanted their child to “transition”, now that the child comes back jacked up!!🥺
Pretty absurd to tell this history while excluding discussion of abortion, given that the founder of Planned Parenthood was a eugenicist and that abortion continues the work of the eugenics movement today, with the vast majority of abortions being performed on minorities or otherwise underprivileged women.
They volunteer. Self eugenics? 😅
Make your own, then.
@@lr6477
In a sense, yes. It's also the more cunning way to do it.
Conveniently left out.
I knew winston churchill was contra democracy, contra emancipation of women and contra "uncivilised" people, but I had no idea he was pro eugenetics.
He was also famously antisemitic - the Balfour Declaration was meant to give the UK somewhere to relocate its Jews
He was a racist.
You know who else believed in Eugenics? Harvard, Yale, Princeton, etc. as well as Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood.
The narrator is excellent. The story was vaguely known to me from research I tripped over whilst looking for other material, but this is a stupendous effort to write so little requires that one must write so much, and have researched even further back, to bring it into today - thank you for your effort and dedication in a ghoulish and dark area of history to have dealt with..
Excellent brave content. Thank you sharing these important facts to understand that the Na tsee party did not start from one day to another..or all of a sudden in situ. I was hoping to see a video after reading this seemly "sensitive" part of history in different languages, except English. Sweden was doing her part too in these eugenics "experiences", like sterilisation. You see, among all the Nordic countries, Sweden was where eugenics met with its greatest success. Up to 63,000 people, mostly women, were sterilised under a "racial purity" programme approved by the state until 1976. So while Sweden was not the only country to practise eugenics before the second world war, it was the first to set up a state institute for racial biology.The institute was founded in 1921 to identify "sexually precocious or mixed-race types", and legislation was enacted in 1934. Although sterilisation operations waned in the 1960s, the law was not repealed until 1976.
Denmark never seem to have stopped this - now, in the 21st Century they still "diagnose" 100% healthy, well educated and lovely people "mentally ill" and, kill - I no longer know how many - "for the fun of it" it seems 😱😰😱
This isn't brave at all, this is just the mainstream narrative lmao. Everything he says in the video is absolutely safe
These Nordic countries still practice eugenics by killing unborn babies, especially those that are believed to have down syndrome, autism, and other birth defects. They brag about how they've "cured" down syndrome yet they haven't done so, they've killed everyone that was believed to have it before they were even born. Just horrible. Those policies of forced sterilizations were happening in America at that time thanks to the Democratic Party and the same thing is happening today in the name of "gender affirming care."
Forced euthanasia? What a euphemism.
Eugenics is back in style in America 100 years later...
It’s never gone away There have been 20 million black babies, murdered by Planned Parenthood, which was started by Margaret Sanger, who was just as much if not more of a racist than Hitler.
Eugenics never went away. How do you think dog breeds came into existence if not by conscious selective reproduction for inheritable traits? Have a think about how societal systems interact with reproductive choices and you'll soon realise that all societies are inherently Eugenic.
@@TPQ1980
Monstrous
Many see Churchill still as a hero, not knowing that he and some others of the English aristocracy and oligarchy was one of the masterminds how to trick Germany into the First World War. The same “trick” used to trick Russia into the war. Churchill is therefore rather the driving force of the fall of the British Empire, without him wanting it of course. But he and his friends did not think of the consequences such a war with Germany and later in the Second World War against the Russians might have.
Your videos are really underrated and should be viewed more.
I think they are basically retellings of articles from Wikipedia and should be viewed less.
Now combine that with the British aristocracy betting on and financing the war
I had no idea how much of the eugenic idea had been put into place in the US. But I do know how much the general thinking of the time had to do with eugenics and the Nazi ideology. European and American scientists were very interested in finding differences in the brains (and intelligence) of different human "species". Trying to prove how much more advanced in terms of evolution, certain peoples were. Thus justifying colonization and subjugation of "lesser" human groups. This continued long after the end of world War two .
I agree. But I believe Darwin's original theory of evolution had to do with adaptability. He left the door open in terms of interpreting intelligence and power. The true test of intelligence is whether or not it helps groups adapt and survive. Although most of human history has been about one group dominating another Darwin pointed out that cooperation between groups was an essential element in the survival of humans as a species.
More people should watch this video. This excellent, well researched and presented video is incredibly informative.
White America has a don't ask don't tell policy in regards to race as demonstrated by all the CRT paranoia.
I disagree. While useful as a gloss this is a shallow treatment of a subject where generalizations are dangerous. Only if auditors learn more can the risks of a shallow understanding be ameliorated. I’d recommend starting with Edwin Black’s ‘War Against The Weak: Eugenics And America’s Campaign To Create A Master Race’.
@@blackice8824Ah, so you’re a racist too. 🙄
@@nomdeguerre7265 yeah... 25 years ago that could be dismissed for the bad joke it is.
Now politicians get elected pushing that " reverse racism ( white victimization ) / white genocide " narrative 💩.
@@blackice8824 As demonstrated by the 1830 Indian Removal Act.
Best introduction video to anybody on the topic of Eugenics I've ever seen. And I learned a ton thought I knew hello Eugenics but obviously I didn't
Eugenic Centers have been renamed Planned Parenthood. If you notice almost all the Planned Parenthood centers are in Black low income locations. It's for a reason. I noticed he didn't mention Margret Sanger.
This!!
I continue to believe that man's greatest enemy is himself. Til we come to this realization we will continue to inflict great misery on both our-selves and each other. Be very careful about what you gift to the universe. One thing is certain. It may go around the block, but you can be certain it will return to knock on your door.
I hope so. And Justice for All.
Ironically Churchill himself was hardly a physical specimens.
Neither are many past and present who consider themselves 0art of a master race
Most advocates of eugenics arent fit by their own standards.
Himmler the head of the SS was a good example I am more fit then that little gremlin was but because I am Afro Latino Heinrich would say that I was inferior.
Dude failed to get into the military had all kinds of health problems and wasnt all that bright.
But because he came from a upper middle class background he had a high view of himself.
Idk living till 90 years old while drinking and chain smoking everyday makes me think he was
@@jefferykirschner8816 True. BUT WHO WANTS TO GO BALD?!!!!!!!!!!
One thing that I've never been able to understand regarding the movement from the idea of artificial selection to its application to genetics is this whole idea of "breeding desirable characteristics", as if none of the scientists promoting this view ever had the sense to ask "Desirable to who?". If you look at even the most successful artificial selection campaigns, I don't think any scientist would claim those efforts made the animal "better". Is a bloodhound really better than a wolf? I mean...they are more docile and their sense of smell is better, but they are completely incapable of meeting the basic needs of survival without human assistance. We selected traits that were desirable to rabbit hunters, not ones that were desirable to the dogs. It stands to reason then that if a long running eugenics campaign ever actually got off the ground and was able to sustain itself for the several generations that would be required to have an effect, the same thing would come out of it, a population bred to suit the needs of the people who made the eugenics laws in the first place, probably not better, but likely more docile, better at being good worker bees, and more amenable to the aims of the people in power with less capability to control their own lives. It's effectively an attempt to domesticate humans, and I understand why that would be attractive to evil billionaires and autocrats, but what I don't understand is why that idea would be attractive to the middle class academics who promoted them in the first place.
Probably half the reason it's had, without pr spin, had less plain a presence among the people it's been applied to. It's neither with their general acceptance or will, nor for their benefit.
Though to answer your question, was actually, despite how some parts may look, actually either applied to all 'groups'? Because if it isn't, but made to look as if it is, then there may be a group among us that is applying it to all of us, that are not limited by funds is billionaire, but something more like a race, cult or something else. Something that bound them together to keep them focused on purpose that would lead there. Because there's no way it occured one day, just spontaneously with only a handful of people aware of such blatantly obvious questions as 'to who', who couldn't easily be fobbed off with verbose versions of 'just better'.
Some dog breeds are much stronger than wolfs, so genetic breeding does in fact works, and animals do it naturally, its called evolution.
What is truly scary is not that a bunch of prominent figures promoted this, but the fact that they had support from population.
Scary how in the absence of brainwashing people gravite towards segregation and eugenics as if these things are natural innate tendencies
It doesn't take long for the evil people in society, to take advantage of government wickedness.
One of the most underrated channels on TH-cam. I had to watch this twice. Great job.
Along with Marie Stoups & Margaret Sanger London declared war on working class planned parenthood exported to US & came back across Atlantic practised in Germany on Industrial Scale
Stopes. Yet thousands of foetuses are aborted each day, all around us and no-one seems bothered. It's justified as the 'woman's right'.
How is that different to the Nassis or Pol Pot or the Gulags or what China does to its minorities.
Folks should consider this in the context of the current sexual/gender revolution eh
Hit the nail ,
No
Thanks for the honesty. At last. As far as I am concerned, Great Britain engaged in extermination in the Southwestern part of Africa around the 18th century. France is doing the same ever so subtly today in Togo. The West, as a whole, needs to look at itself.
Don’t say the west because Brazil, Argentina, Colombia aren’t involved in this. USA I don’t know about.
@@capeverdeanprincess4444Those countries aren’t part of “The West”. Maybe Argentina, definitely not Brazil and Colombia. They haven’t been stable enough for that title.
The West is as follows. Most EU nations, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, and The UK
@@caydcrow5161 Brazil is the west lol 😂, educate yourself and look up the meaning of western nations.
@@caydcrow5161 Japan and South Korea aren’t western nations, that’s hilarious 😂
@@capeverdeanprincess4444 there's a long history of european colonization that everyone in this thread seems to have forgetten lol. But it makes much more sense to think about this in terms of the global North and the global south. The global North is the imperialist nations and the global south are the nations being colonized, neocolonized, and super exploited. Some of those nations become wanna be colonizers themselves like Japan.
The scariest bit about going deeper into history is that you realize that while the Nazis were exceptionally evil, they weren’t that exceptionally evil.
09:20 Wow. Just realized California alone did almost half of the total eugenic sterilizations in the United States.
Woodrow Wilson was a major instigator of the demise of black people in the U.S.
I think if you research the Fabian society... you'll find that Huxley, Churchill and others were trying to work on problems...but many of them bailed out when eugenics came on the table...brave new world by Huxley can be seen as a whistle blower piece of art...pretty complex topic you've attempted to encapsulate.
Progressive democrats in the US were truly the source of the eugenics movement & the inspiration for the Nazi party
12:29 Forced sterilisation in iζrαεl…
“Forced contraception of J’ 3 ω5h Ethopian women is tip of global iceberg” …The Guardian .
Chatham House in London is very much involved since 1920, and will remain so!!!!
Didn't Huxley backtrack on BNW... He actually took some of those ideas seriously.
@@mikethebloodthirsty yeah he wrote brave new world revisited...if I remember correctly he retracted a few things and said he'd write a few things differently. I think it's difficult really, for us to judge in any reasonable way what would have been deemed Vanguard intellectual inquiry... however, it's irresponsible to try to make a connection between those individuals and Hitler...where would we be without Churchill... Churchill was a painter...so was Hitler...art shows the soul...there is no comparison. Hitler was strung out on coke, meth and barbiturates...no wonder he committed a horrendous act of hubris...mind boggling. Churchill was shouting till he was blue in the face prior to the second war... everyone was tired of war...but he saw it coming...that is undeniable.
I was told by Germans we did not do anything Americans, and British didn't do. Like the camps British put the Dutch lock up in South Africa.
The British didn't systematically murder millions of people.
Yet 24.000 german pows in Britain in ww2 chose to stay here after the war .
Yes, the power elite of the 19th and 20th centuries were all doing the same things. Ironically, the Germans got to the "party" late and therefore did less than the others. Of course, to the victors go the spoils and the winners write the history books, so we have to be very measured and apply critical scrutiny to all information, as well as putting the acts of the past into their proper context in time. It's a mistake to judge the past by the prevailing moral standards of the present as the future may judge us as lacking too.
We should learn from out past, not try to forget it.. or we are bound to repeat it from our ignorance and assumtions that we know better without it.
We should be alot more well aware of what happend, why it happend and how we can better deal with any of these problems.
Not only that but the United States was the leader in eugenics. And Hitler followed their studies and findings religiously. So basically America was pushing Eugenics (which was considered legit science back then). Hitler believed what they were saying, therefore believing that certain races were superior than others. So then essentially the United States played a pretty significant part in forming Hitlers ideology. Which he then used to justify his future actions. Then America talks ad nauseam about how horrible of a person Hitler was. While never taking responsibility for their own eugenics program or for their part in radicalizing Hitler. They never took responsibility for what happened with Ted Kaczynski ether. Or a lot of other really terrible things that they have done. All while being quick to point out everyone else’s “atrocities”. 🤔
Crazy how few people are subscribed to this channel, despite the quality 🤔
What I always find interesting is that the more common argument against eugenics is that it is ineffective rather than immoral. What does it say about us that we care less for human rights and more for mechanical efficiency?
It's more common because it's a more effective argument. As a matter of technicality. Do you understand...? So it's not a comment upon anything.
It's a better argument to someone who doesn't have an ethical problem with eugenics.
@@randomduck8679 ok so you dont understand. thx for letting me know
If you're not a sociopath, you already know why it's immoral. Unfortunately, far too many people in positions of power are not constrained by what we typically call a conscience, empathy or sympathy, so a utilitarian case should be made and included in the argument.
The video claims the ideas of some eugenicists are unethical, he does not claim that selective breading in humans in and of itself is evil or does not work. We bread all forms of animals for certain traits, why would it not be effective in humans.
As a complement: "Corbett Report - Why big oil conquered the World"
From Eugenics to the Environmental movement
Yeah I've heard this a lot, and it's forever disappointing to see how Winston Churchill is still held up as some kind of hero, here in Britain. If people knew more about him, they'd (hopefully) stop worshipping his image.
Sweden kept eugenics up until the 70s. Cant argue with the results though
Mad men playing God
Yes my friend. And unfortunately it's not even half of what they are capable of today. Mad scientists everywhere, playing God.
That moment when everything hitler said would happen is happening lol
Thank you I found the video very good but I found it interesting that you left out planned parenthood in the US.
That stuck out at me as well. A bit deceptive, I think.
The 0.1% controls our history, the flow of information and what we’re allowed to consume intellectually on a massive scale globally. So because of this, there’s just so much important, relevant information that so many of us don’t know which makes it impossible to make informed decisions and opinions on past and current issues.
“I want a nation of workers, not a nation of thinkers”
-J.D Rockefeller (funded the general education board of America)
Eye opening, though I must have dozed off during the part where they covered Margaret Sanger.
Forced sterilisation in iςrαεl…
“Forced contraception of J’3ω5h Ethopian women is tip of global iceberg” …The Guardian .
Who gives a shit?
Bro here just called eugenics pseudoscience💀💀
Ever since the big C started I haven’t stopped falling down the rabbit holes…. We really are truly living in the matrix. Nothing is changed. It’s just ramped up in technology now.
Was the BIG C an experiment, an accident, a psychosis. or just blind panic based on no real evidence of its harmfulness? Of course we know what the jab was, a golden opportunity.
Please remain strong my friend 🙏. The things that will come to light in the next few years are enough to send anyone into a corner with a paper bag. But it needs to happen so we can all learn from our mistakes.. in order for it to never happen again. ❤
I just can't handle how mainstream normies will deny all of this and call you an Alex jones listener for mentioning Margeret Sangers name.
You can read diary of the wives and see in the 1800s how these ideas flourished and went from husbandry to evolutionary mythology
You can add teddy Roosevelt to this list it wasn't just democrats or liberals just like we see Rino/dino establishment today they existed then.
You can read a short or extended version of the 1830 Indian Removal Act and remember that women weren't allowed to vote or hold office at that time, either, not until 1920.
@@jasonbrown372 Huh? My point was its a good window into the homes of those elitist men and the changing beliefs and views of race of those times.
Everyday life views of slaves went from communial care education helping to civilize to a lesser than human racist sub species who can't ever learn or improve and always needs to be managed
@@jasonbrown372 woman ran the household and that's where husbandry was excersized. The practice of farming and breeding animals. Ideas of Eugene's spread and People begin to be seen the same way. Before that they weren't seen that way.
The video claims the ideas of some eugenicists are unethical, he does not claim that selective breading in humans in and of itself is evil or does not work. We bread all forms of animals for certain traits, why would it not be effective in humans.
@@biteme8905 yeah I was just referring to the spread of ideas in who what where and how you can spot some its trail.
Even before lye or darwin and his nephew created the language and dialogue this stuff was cooking in the minds of the French courts.
You can follow the trail through teachers and how it flourished and even motives and driving forced behind is radical views and inspirations
God,Churchill was a miserable looking Bastard (3.00) You would'nt think he owned Blenheim Palace! An excellent and very educational Video as always.
Thank you Daniel! Yes, he does seem to have enjoyed being miserable and keeping others in their misery too.
I don't think he did own Blenheim Palace. It might have been his uncle.
Well he was actually born in one of the rooms,he definitely had some stake in the place I'm sure.
@@IRISHguitarist777 Yes, he was born there, but he didn't own it.
I see,l thought because his great great great etc Grandfather was The Duke of Marlborough ( Sir John Churchill,the Victor of Blenheim) that Winston was the WW2 owner ,I'll have to Google that now and I'm also curious who owns it these days too,cheers.
Funny how he failed to mention the Victorian's who started it all along with the German's. Smart people love to come up with these crazy ideas.
It’s that old American dad joke “WHAT? You don’t know WHY the Germans and Americans fought in WWII?”
**shakes head**
“Nobody knows”
Really good summation. 👍
Thank you for this history lesson. I have never heard this story. I know that the woman that founded planned Parenthood believed this.
I have given up waiting for all these superior beings to save the world. We will save the world instead. Don't wait for a psychopath, to do something you can do much better.
That's the trick. People tell you what "god" said, (such as those with dark skin being inferior), just to manipulate and get power. You are right. In the future, OUR future, such beliefs are going to have to be put where they actually belong, and given as much respect as any other story in the library.
Right, when Judeo-Christianity are very much White supremacist ideologies. Christianity is just a continuation of Western imperialism. Christianity is based on the West as savior and the non-West as the meek that need to suffer and give up their food, land, and resources to the granted people, the West. Today, the Jews are the new Nazis.
" I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity and her vision...I am really in awe of her" - Hillary Clinton
I learned about our history of eugenics in a US public school.
"The racist basis of his thinking" Love it 😂
Good info.
I'm curious about Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood, and Eugenics.
Not mentioned in this piece.
The nazis just read what reinforced their prior beliefs. They just went into their own echo chamber. But I’m sure eugenics did sway others.
Its easy to judge people in history.
They lived in a different time, with a different understanding of race and culture. We are still not done with the quest of understanding man and all our forms, the bell curve is the example of this.
They had the correct understanding of race. For the last ~80 years we have been traveling back in time in terms of understanding human nature.
The Bell curve simply depicts the distribution of IQ and the distribution, frequency or manifestation of other traits among populations. It's just a data tool, how it is used, like any tool, is dependant on the tool user. We should be wise not to imbue the tool with characteristics it doesn't possess.
@@garrysmodsketchestrue. We need more people speaking facts.
@@TPQ1980 agree, I don't think it can be honestly used for bad things, it simply provides people with the fact of variables between people.
Im not saying its simply nature, or nurture.