Ukraine SHOULD be allowed to hit military buildups just over the border, Russia is using this restriction to their advantage whilst they use foreign munitions to hit civilian targets in Ukraine !
@@canisXsapien I don’t disagree, but it’d be hilarious to see happen. Could you imagine the Russian public response? Seems to me the only way they’ll finally admit their failures would be such a crushing defeat. Otherwise, they’ll just continue lying and saying things like “we accomplished our mission and left.”
And any/all military manufacturing plants and facilities as well. They seem rather proud to tout their “new wartime economy” (which I think is a myth in this case), so it’d crush their moral as well.
1:30:50 I'm a retired law enforcement officer, and as far as I've been instructed, police use hollow-point bullets strictly to reduce the threat of over-penetration and injury to innocent bystanders. Whereas a FMJ has a greater potential to over-penetrate and strike a civilian behind a perpetrator, the hollow-point expands and has much less a chance to over-penetrate. As a secondary benefit, the hollow-point dumps all of its kinetic energy into the targeted body giving it a better chance at stopping any threat from a potential assailant whereas the FMJ (when over-penetrating) still carries lethal kinetic energy beyond the intended target. That's the first and foremost reason why police are authorized to use hollow-points (*to reduce the risk of death or injury toward innocent bystanders).😉
Rules of war are international treaties between nations on what they each can do to each other during a war for which they would not be penalized when the war is over ¬ expect reprisals during or after the war. It does not address laws within a country or how they deal with their own citizens. If we want our police to have the same legal limits as our military including the use of deadly force then we need to create laws at the local , state & national levels.
Always sad to think of some family coming back after the war. To find their home was destroyed in combat with people left to rot there after the battle
Hollow point ammunition is far more efficient than FMJ-absolute fact. You’re repeating what has been said, but it’s been proven false over and over again. What’s funny is how FMJ is broadly banned for all hunting in the US, for reasons stating it is ineffective and inhumane, which is often true. You’re showing your naïveté.
In your map comparison you left out Alaska and Hawaii. By adding the distances Alaska would contribute, that would double what you showed, depending on how you positioned the areas. I met a military guy at a gas station in Alaska who said he had driven from Florida to Alaska without sleep, and he didn't take the short route either. He went up the east coast first.
The idea behind the ban on expanding bullets was to reduce deaths. An expanding bullet causes hydrostatic shock and massive hemorrhaging. An FMJ bullet doesn't dump all its energy and cause the shock. It makes a puncture wound that is much more likely to be survivable. It certainly wasn't an agreement by all parties to increase the amount of suffering their troops would endure. It did increase the amount of suffering, but it mainly reduced the death toll. The NATO 5.56 round was designed with a long narrow bullet so that it would fly cleanly and tumble when it hit flesh. This creates large tearing wounds that cause massive blood loss and are much more likely to be fatal than a full-powered round going right through. War is always ugly, no matter how people try to make it easier to tolerate.
the russian 5.45 bullet has a hollow space in the front under the copper and a steel penetrator. the theory was if it hit something soft, the penetrator would move to the front of the bullet into the hollow space and destabilize it, causing tumbling. if it hit something hard, the copper would deform and the penetrator would continue through. at least, that was the theory. not sure if it worked.
I never understood this. You dont shoot at someone if the intention is not to kill them. I think they found it more horrific in the medical side if they cant treat the wound well - but shooting is killing, and dont shoot if you dont want the recipient dead.
@@JohnLehman-yt1gt While I agree, there is actually a whole lot more that goes into that calculation, both on the performance side and the result on the battle field. A deceased combatant doesn’t need aid, a wounded one does. A wounded soldier removes at least one other soldier (usually more) from the fight to render aid, even if only for a moment. I could go on and on about military ammunition testing and selection, but every time I try, my comments get the axe.
@@JohnLehman-yt1gt - There are a lot of common misconceptions about war. One is that killing the enemy is the main point. It isn't. The point is to get him to stop trying to kill you. There are several ways this can be achieved. If you can convince him to surrender, run away, or mutiny, these are all much more useful ways than killing him. Wounding an enemy combatant is probably the most productive way of nullifying him. It ruins the morale of the men who have to deal with him and watch and hear him, it takes at least two other people to carry him off, and he'll go home with a grisly mutilation that will remind the folks that this war isn't a fun and glorious thing. "Don't shoot it unless you intend to kill it" is a civilian rule. War is a matter of breaking the enemy's will to fight. Dead men don't do as much toward that as wounded ones.
@@warhorse03826 - The tumbling 5.56 didn't do exactly what they expected, either. I think the boffins were still picturing battles with the sides sniping at each other from five hundred meters apart. Tbh, I always thought the Soviet 7.62 was a better choice for an assault rifle round. The heavier bullet goes through twigs and such instead of twanging off into space. Neither round is any use for hunting, no matter what the fan boys say.
i use to live next to lake Ann nuclear power plant in Va, place was in the sticks, and crazy ominous, they did siren tests every month or so, very creepy hearing air raid style sirens in the woods is all ima say about it, ooo and its built on a fault line .... ^w^ .... yeah i moved far away from it
I think that if the USA isn't going to give the green light to Ukraine about the use of its combat systems, then it should hold Iran and China directly responsible for their weapons being used against Ukraine. Advise both countries that they have 30 days to recall their systems and remove their licenses, or NATO will consider it an act of war.
That’d only be fair. Russia is doing a great job at playing this game on uneven ground. I’m not sure why world “leaders” continue to fall for it. If it’s okay for Russia to do it, then they’ve set the standard. We’ve got to stop allowing Russia to make up bs rules as it goes along. Why are people even listening to them in the first place? It’s insanity.
Destroying oil and steel production effects the military, yes, but you can be certain that it will first effect the civilian population. Targeting road and electrical infrastructure is CERTAINLY dual use. The military doesn't have their own roads (see Grad launch video). Electricity aids nighttime movement, non-battlefield repairs, rearmament, etc. The civilians are in a terrible situation, but by choice of the government they ultimately support. Don't directly target civilians. Target anything that might otherwise aid military movement. This is not a grey area.
I think the Ukrainians have taken out sea defense and now land defense in prep for Crimean assaults by the F-16 , coming in from the south of Odessa over the sea. Ultimately able to knock out the Kerch bridge.
Keep up the good work in promoting Ukraine's stalwart defence against the marauding horde of Orcs, its righteous cause, and its intrinsic value to all of us in the West as a beacon of liberty. P.S. links to some of the war maps seems corrupted, i.e., link to Map for Day 812 directs user to Map for Day 814.
Did I miss what happened to the battle in belgorod and the pro Russian forces? Haven’t heard anything in a week or two since both sides were shelling the town
At 1:00 very interesting issue about separating civilian from military targets. As though there are some kind of "inherent" rules of war. Geneva set some kind of moral code that limits only the adherents to it. Yet, it is merely a cultural construct. Surely an Islam nation does not adhere to it. Nor does a dictatorship/terrorist country such as the Hamas of Gaza. Is the citizen not liable for what its government and military do? Why did we insist that local German citizens make visits to the concentration camps, if we believe they were exempt from the decisions of war?
Hi enforcer, watched your latest video & listened to your discussion about what is a military target ?. I would like to said it is war & everything is a target, but it comes down to morals & the engagement of war & law. The trouble is ukraine is fighting a enemy that has no morals & doesn't fight with in those laws. The west abides by those set of rules & looks at ukraine to keep with in those rules or it will eventually give up support. We have to stop thinking like the west & more like our enemy but with a moral stand point. Im with the person that said yes let's go for the electrical infustruture , but not in belgorord in Moscow & St petersberg, that could then have the effect on people uprising in the streets & ending the war quicker & get rid of putin..
No real reason Ukraine should strike civilian infarstructure pr se.. Powerplants and substations supplying factories (and incidently some civilians too) sure go for it. Backup generators costs fuel too. But at that with clear emphasis on disabeling millitary production, not just blacking out large cities. This being the spring even in Russia, its hardly like people cant make provisions for heating before winter returns. Noticably refineries, concrete and steel production use massive amounts of electricity. But again im not arguing for taking out random powerplants just for the cascade effect. To some extend, especially in the occupied regions of Ukraine civilian infarstructure is allready severely damaged if not destroyed. That includes roads, railways, electrical grid, watersupply, television masts etc. As theese are used by Russians for logistics and IE watertowers for surveilance equipment. But that isnt a valid reason for Ukraine to go round Russia targeting similar installations.
Russians need to feel the same pains of war that Ukrainians have. They continue to feel safe, making this war less of a reality in their everyday life. That needs to change. When it does, putin will lose massive amounts of support. In my experience, many Russians are selfish and shallow. Take away their modern conveniences and they’ll grumble to no end. Taking out means of entertainment (internet and television) would have catastrophic effects.
The attacks on the Crimea could lead Russia to two options move in more air defence leaving other areas short or move their aircraft further away leaving Crimea open to attacks as in the Russian navy
We do here about the Ukrainian losses, from the russian side. Pro Ukrainian side do not believe the russian numbers and the pro russian side do not believe the Ukrainian numbers.
I admire the Enforcers moral stance but Ukraine has a duty to protect its citizens and a part of that is deterrence. But as Matt said that doesn't mean bombing apartment blocks but hitting critical infrastructure that contributes to military operations but may hurt the civilian population as well. A boxer can only get hit below the belt so many times before he gets to thinking he is being taken for a fool.
Ukraine targeting airfields, aircraft, radar installations, and oil refineries refining aviation fuel! Sounds like F-16's are arriving soon :D @1:29:56 Is that a war crime? Any counter battery will probably hit the nearby civilian vehicles.
Slovakian primeminister was fairly pro Russian. I guess in theory Russia could have wanted a martyr, along the lines of blaming Ukraine sae as they tried with the concert terror attack.. But that is pretty speculative and Slovakia isnt exactely a huge possible contributor or opponent of noticable power. Hypothetically some massive contributor (like IE the US) stopping its support could leade a desperate nation to try some form of false flag or seemingly random attack on its leadership. But the support or lack of support from Slovakia thats allready given most its Soviet gear anyways... Nah nobody cares. Now asides from that, if we really want to go into conspiracy theories, some or all of the EU countries are a more likely culprit than Ukraine. As slovakia aswell as Hungary are causing problems in the EU leadership and there could be more pro russian to the pro russianism of the two countries than is widely known.
@@sallywilton2236 Guess not impossible that some nutter decided he voted proper pro russian and was mad Slovakia didnt start fighting Ukrine actively. But i doubt he was FSB (never know, but im guessing no)
May be the pro russia murderer think that Fico do not enought (as Orban did) for russia. But strange for sure since Fico cut all Slovakia help for Ukraine.
Nonsense-Russia made a push. They’re losing men and equipment faster than they can possibly replenish them. It’s all for show and entirely unsustainable, even if conscription numbers quadrupled and they far surpass their manufacturing goals and capacity. All Ukraine has to do is maintain the current projection. Even if they lose considerable ground, they’re still winning. The long game favors Ukraine, and all Russia is doing is speeding up their own downfall. In a few months time (or sooner), Russia will make a mass exodus yet again, and call it a “tactical withdrawal.” Wait and see. I’ll be back here to say “told you so.”
Ukraine SHOULD be allowed to hit military buildups just over the border, Russia is using this restriction to their advantage whilst they use foreign munitions to hit civilian targets in Ukraine !
100%
Foreign munitions... like the Ukrainazis use foreign munitions to shell their own citizens?
I'm of the opinion that anything Russia has done is on the table for Ukraine to do right back.
@@canisXsapien I don’t disagree, but it’d be hilarious to see happen. Could you imagine the Russian public response? Seems to me the only way they’ll finally admit their failures would be such a crushing defeat. Otherwise, they’ll just continue lying and saying things like “we accomplished our mission and left.”
Railway yards and bridges, electric facilities, land bridges, airports, oil facilities.... all fair game.
And any/all military manufacturing plants and facilities as well. They seem rather proud to tout their “new wartime economy” (which I think is a myth in this case), so it’d crush their moral as well.
Great stream guys, really enjoyed this one
We live in the modern world fighting Russia, who lives in WWII. Sad.
1:30:50 I'm a retired law enforcement officer, and as far as I've been instructed, police use hollow-point bullets strictly to reduce the threat of over-penetration and injury to innocent bystanders. Whereas a FMJ has a greater potential to over-penetrate and strike a civilian behind a perpetrator, the hollow-point expands and has much less a chance to over-penetrate. As a secondary benefit, the hollow-point dumps all of its kinetic energy into the targeted body giving it a better chance at stopping any threat from a potential assailant whereas the FMJ (when over-penetrating) still carries lethal kinetic energy beyond the intended target. That's the first and foremost reason why police are authorized to use hollow-points (*to reduce the risk of death or injury toward innocent bystanders).😉
Thank you both for all your hard work and support for Ukraine.
Rules of war are international treaties between nations on what they each can do to each other during a war for which they would not be penalized when the war is over ¬ expect reprisals during or after the war. It does not address laws within a country or how they deal with their own citizens. If we want our police to have the same legal limits as our military including the use of deadly force then we need to create laws at the local , state & national levels.
Thank you Konstantin. I agree, its just not worth it.
Slava Ukraini
Always sad to think of some family coming back after the war. To find their home was destroyed in combat with people left to rot there after the battle
Hollow point ammunition is far more efficient than FMJ-absolute fact.
You’re repeating what has been said, but it’s been proven false over and over again.
What’s funny is how FMJ is broadly banned for all hunting in the US, for reasons stating it is ineffective and inhumane, which is often true.
You’re showing your naïveté.
Hearing a hum from a turbine. Look at horrible death of Norwegian nature of the enormous amount of corrupt wind turbines.
In your map comparison you left out Alaska and Hawaii. By adding the distances Alaska would contribute, that would double what you showed, depending on how you positioned the areas. I met a military guy at a gas station in Alaska who said he had driven from Florida to Alaska without sleep, and he didn't take the short route either. He went up the east coast first.
The idea behind the ban on expanding bullets was to reduce deaths. An expanding bullet causes hydrostatic shock and massive hemorrhaging. An FMJ bullet doesn't dump all its energy and cause the shock. It makes a puncture wound that is much more likely to be survivable. It certainly wasn't an agreement by all parties to increase the amount of suffering their troops would endure. It did increase the amount of suffering, but it mainly reduced the death toll.
The NATO 5.56 round was designed with a long narrow bullet so that it would fly cleanly and tumble when it hit flesh. This creates large tearing wounds that cause massive blood loss and are much more likely to be fatal than a full-powered round going right through. War is always ugly, no matter how people try to make it easier to tolerate.
the russian 5.45 bullet has a hollow space in the front under the copper and a steel penetrator. the theory was if it hit something soft, the penetrator would move to the front of the bullet into the hollow space and destabilize it, causing tumbling. if it hit something hard, the copper would deform and the penetrator would continue through.
at least, that was the theory. not sure if it worked.
I never understood this. You dont shoot at someone if the intention is not to kill them. I think they found it more horrific in the medical side if they cant treat the wound well - but shooting is killing, and dont shoot if you dont want the recipient dead.
@@JohnLehman-yt1gt While I agree, there is actually a whole lot more that goes into that calculation, both on the performance side and the result on the battle field. A deceased combatant doesn’t need aid, a wounded one does. A wounded soldier removes at least one other soldier (usually more) from the fight to render aid, even if only for a moment.
I could go on and on about military ammunition testing and selection, but every time I try, my comments get the axe.
@@JohnLehman-yt1gt - There are a lot of common misconceptions about war. One is that killing the enemy is the main point. It isn't. The point is to get him to stop trying to kill you. There are several ways this can be achieved. If you can convince him to surrender, run away, or mutiny, these are all much more useful ways than killing him. Wounding an enemy combatant is probably the most productive way of nullifying him. It ruins the morale of the men who have to deal with him and watch and hear him, it takes at least two other people to carry him off, and he'll go home with a grisly mutilation that will remind the folks that this war isn't a fun and glorious thing.
"Don't shoot it unless you intend to kill it" is a civilian rule. War is a matter of breaking the enemy's will to fight. Dead men don't do as much toward that as wounded ones.
@@warhorse03826 - The tumbling 5.56 didn't do exactly what they expected, either. I think the boffins were still picturing battles with the sides sniping at each other from five hundred meters apart. Tbh, I always thought the Soviet 7.62 was a better choice for an assault rifle round. The heavier bullet goes through twigs and such instead of twanging off into space. Neither round is any use for hunting, no matter what the fan boys say.
Slava ukraine 💙 💛
i use to live next to lake Ann nuclear power plant in Va, place was in the sticks, and crazy ominous, they did siren tests every month or so, very creepy hearing air raid style sirens in the woods is all ima say about it, ooo and its built on a fault line .... ^w^ .... yeah i moved far away from it
the free russian army never bombarded belgorod heavily, it was a very light bombardement
Hello Enforcer and Hello Enforcer Matt Україні! 🇺🇦🦖✊
Love the Ukraine national anthem at the end-magic.
I think that if the USA isn't going to give the green light to Ukraine about the use of its combat systems, then it should hold Iran and China directly responsible for their weapons being used against Ukraine. Advise both countries that they have 30 days to recall their systems and remove their licenses, or NATO will consider it an act of war.
That’d only be fair. Russia is doing a great job at playing this game on uneven ground. I’m not sure why world “leaders” continue to fall for it. If it’s okay for Russia to do it, then they’ve set the standard. We’ve got to stop allowing Russia to make up bs rules as it goes along. Why are people even listening to them in the first place? It’s insanity.
Destroying oil and steel production effects the military, yes, but you can be certain that it will first effect the civilian population.
Targeting road and electrical infrastructure is CERTAINLY dual use. The military doesn't have their own roads (see Grad launch video). Electricity aids nighttime movement, non-battlefield repairs, rearmament, etc. The civilians are in a terrible situation, but by choice of the government they ultimately support.
Don't directly target civilians. Target anything that might otherwise aid military movement.
This is not a grey area.
I think the Ukrainians have taken out sea defense and now land defense in prep for Crimean assaults by the F-16 , coming in from the south of Odessa over the sea. Ultimately able to knock out the Kerch bridge.
Keep up the good work in promoting Ukraine's stalwart defence against the marauding horde of Orcs, its righteous cause, and its intrinsic value to all of us in the West as a beacon of liberty. P.S. links to some of the war maps seems corrupted, i.e., link to Map for Day 812 directs user to Map for Day 814.
Did I miss what happened to the battle in belgorod and the pro Russian forces? Haven’t heard anything in a week or two since both sides were shelling the town
At 1:00 very interesting issue about separating civilian from military targets. As though there are some kind of "inherent" rules of war. Geneva set some kind of moral code that limits only the adherents to it. Yet, it is merely a cultural construct. Surely an Islam nation does not adhere to it. Nor does a dictatorship/terrorist country such as the Hamas of Gaza. Is the citizen not liable for what its government and military do? Why did we insist that local German citizens make visits to the concentration camps, if we believe they were exempt from the decisions of war?
Hi enforcer, watched your latest video & listened to your discussion about what is a military target ?. I would like to said it is war & everything is a target, but it comes down to morals & the engagement of war & law. The trouble is ukraine is fighting a enemy that has no morals & doesn't fight with in those laws. The west abides by those set of rules & looks at ukraine to keep with in those rules or it will eventually give up support. We have to stop thinking like the west & more like our enemy but with a moral stand point. Im with the person that said yes let's go for the electrical infustruture , but not in belgorord in Moscow & St petersberg, that could then have the effect on people uprising in the streets & ending the war quicker & get rid of putin..
Goodmorning guys it's lovely to have breakfast watching your channel which is really informational x
No real reason Ukraine should strike civilian infarstructure pr se.. Powerplants and substations supplying factories (and incidently some civilians too) sure go for it. Backup generators costs fuel too. But at that with clear emphasis on disabeling millitary production, not just blacking out large cities.
This being the spring even in Russia, its hardly like people cant make provisions for heating before winter returns. Noticably refineries, concrete and steel production use massive amounts of electricity. But again im not arguing for taking out random powerplants just for the cascade effect.
To some extend, especially in the occupied regions of Ukraine civilian infarstructure is allready severely damaged if not destroyed. That includes roads, railways, electrical grid, watersupply, television masts etc. As theese are used by Russians for logistics and IE watertowers for surveilance equipment. But that isnt a valid reason for Ukraine to go round Russia targeting similar installations.
Russians need to feel the same pains of war that Ukrainians have. They continue to feel safe, making this war less of a reality in their everyday life. That needs to change. When it does, putin will lose massive amounts of support. In my experience, many Russians are selfish and shallow. Take away their modern conveniences and they’ll grumble to no end.
Taking out means of entertainment (internet and television) would have catastrophic effects.
A lot of people, some people.
"Book suppository" - sounds unpleasant 😮😂
Why is this man alive
The attacks on the Crimea could lead Russia to two options move in more air defence leaving other areas short or move their aircraft further away leaving Crimea open to attacks as in the Russian navy
🇺🇸🇺🇦❤🤍💙💛🌹🇮🇱🤍💙
It was a nutter i heard him say he did not agree with the president's politics this is not a an Archduke Franz Ferdinand moment .
Why do we not hear about Ukraine losses which is about 1/3 Russian losses I think? If true, this is not sustainable. Please informe
We do here about the Ukrainian losses, from the russian side. Pro Ukrainian side do not believe the russian numbers and the pro russian side do not believe the Ukrainian numbers.
Ukrainian losses are 5 to 7 times more than Russian losses
Is this like, uh, winter 1944?
🚜🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🔱🔱🔱
Go🇺🇦
I admire the Enforcers moral stance but Ukraine has a duty to protect its citizens and a part of that is deterrence.
But as Matt said that doesn't mean bombing apartment blocks but hitting critical infrastructure that contributes to military operations but may hurt the civilian population as well.
A boxer can only get hit below the belt so many times before he gets to thinking he is being taken for a fool.
The battle ship is coming back!
Make a T shirt with 'Kimbo Abe - Alabama Samurai" on it with a guy with a mullet holding a hunting rifle. Sold.
All is fair in love and war.
LSA!
Best live stream in all the multi-verses👍
What is the name of the song at the very beginning?
I don't know an awful lot about him, but I do know that President Fico is pretty much a Russian plant... Sooooo... Sympathy.? 😉
LSA! LSA! LSA!
Enforcer, you have my unofficial fan group, Friends of The Enforcer. It's much more disarming than the Cult of Matt.
💙🔱💛
1:46:14 in general you are correct but the bombing of Dresden and Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not child’s play. It was very controversial.
Why do your videos always have to start in 9minutes
Chernobyl was FAR FAR worse than Fukishima.
LSA
Ukraine targeting airfields, aircraft, radar installations, and oil refineries refining aviation fuel! Sounds like F-16's are arriving soon :D
@1:29:56 Is that a war crime? Any counter battery will probably hit the nearby civilian vehicles.
Slovakian primeminister was fairly pro Russian. I guess in theory Russia could have wanted a martyr, along the lines of blaming Ukraine sae as they tried with the concert terror attack.. But that is pretty speculative and Slovakia isnt exactely a huge possible contributor or opponent of noticable power.
Hypothetically some massive contributor (like IE the US) stopping its support could leade a desperate nation to try some form of false flag or seemingly random attack on its leadership. But the support or lack of support from Slovakia thats allready given most its Soviet gear anyways... Nah nobody cares.
Now asides from that, if we really want to go into conspiracy theories, some or all of the EU countries are a more likely culprit than Ukraine. As slovakia aswell as Hungary are causing problems in the EU leadership and there could be more pro russian to the pro russianism of the two countries than is widely known.
@@sallywilton2236 Guess not impossible that some nutter decided he voted proper pro russian and was mad Slovakia didnt start fighting Ukrine actively. But i doubt he was FSB (never know, but im guessing no)
May be the pro russia murderer think that Fico do not enought (as Orban did) for russia. But strange for sure since Fico cut all Slovakia help for Ukraine.
Well--- air defense was on the ball again I see !!!!!!!!
Naughty Naughty, been playing copyrighted music again? There was an Ad at the start of ur stream LOL
Ukraine DONT STYLE MONY
Kyiv Mayor Vitaliy Klitschko explained why his children party in Europe instead of defending Ukraine.
Unfortunately, my children are German citizens.
🤡🤡🤡🤣😆🤣
The unfortunate reality is Ukraine is on the back foot and will not recover from this. They should sign a peace deal while they can.
812 days now you've been saying that, Ivan.
Nonsense-Russia made a push. They’re losing men and equipment faster than they can possibly replenish them. It’s all for show and entirely unsustainable, even if conscription numbers quadrupled and they far surpass their manufacturing goals and capacity.
All Ukraine has to do is maintain the current projection. Even if they lose considerable ground, they’re still winning. The long game favors Ukraine, and all Russia is doing is speeding up their own downfall.
In a few months time (or sooner), Russia will make a mass exodus yet again, and call it a “tactical withdrawal.” Wait and see. I’ll be back here to say “told you so.”
That is like Poland asking for a peace treaty with Hitler.
Lsa
More fake news 🤦🏿♂️
Awe, thanks for the analytics boost though! 🍻
@@jackjohnson291 Go cry. It won’t be a Ukraine soon 🤣
@sallywilton2236 There's 2 sides to every story.... with photographs, videos and references. This channel only gives you 1 side of the story.
@@phillippac.7469 Exactly! Also Russian offensive isn’t crumbling. That’s just a straight out lie
@@sallywilton2236 Levan Gudadze
Cope nation
🦘🦘🦘