Apollo.io vs. UpLead (In-Depth Review) | Best Lead Generation Tools, Compared

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @tamaramccourt8013
    @tamaramccourt8013 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How is it unbiased if you are representing Uplead?

    • @UpLeadB2Bprospecting
      @UpLeadB2Bprospecting  ปีที่แล้ว

      We each have our strengths! They have more contacts for cheaper, but we guarantee the highest quality data. Depends on your needs really!

    • @mdaziz8047
      @mdaziz8047 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UpLeadB2Bprospecting
      Sir please I need resettlement for American I have a femily menbar

  • @B22.Dota2
    @B22.Dota2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I will still stay with Apollo

    • @UpLeadB2Bprospecting
      @UpLeadB2Bprospecting  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you ever want highest quality leads and end up closing more deals, you know where to find us! www.uplead.com/freetrial

  • @kellyhill9774
    @kellyhill9774 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    you skipped over there is a BIG difference in price!

    • @UpLeadB2Bprospecting
      @UpLeadB2Bprospecting  ปีที่แล้ว

      You can pay less for lower data quality and waste more time on bad leads and targeting OR you can pay for high quality leads that actually result in sales AND won't deteriorate your email domain - choice is yours!

    • @kellyhill9774
      @kellyhill9774 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UpLeadB2Bprospecting I am actually researching to subscribe. What qualifies as "lower data quality"? What is an acceptable % of "bad leads"? I find a lot of vague information with no real qualifiers so that leaves me unsure of what to buy. Is 2% reasonable? If you, with Uplead, test out the data of others, what is the "bad" rate for the others and what is it for Uplead as of a certain date and specific type of data? This would be helpful. "lower quality" does mean anything and "bad leads" is vague. I would really like to understand more to make a decision.