Russia’s New Il-96-400M Stretch Takes Its 1st Flight

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @estraume
    @estraume ปีที่แล้ว +865

    Is this more fuel efficient than the A340? Or maybe, the right question: Does fuel efficiency even matter in Russia?

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +174

      erm...Engines Made in Russia...what do you think?! 😂😂

    • @filledwithvariousknowledge2747
      @filledwithvariousknowledge2747 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@swanvictor887Much worse

    • @redbull1826
      @redbull1826 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      @@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 they made new engines they are pretty good on paper and judging by that they are going to be used its safe tos ay they are more efficient then the older engines they used

    • @Delta_NWAB747fan
      @Delta_NWAB747fan ปีที่แล้ว +122

      I don’t think it matters. The only customers will be Russian airlines and Cubana, they just want Russian built jets and I don’t think they care about that.

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      Doesn't matter, the A340 is mostly retired and this thing wont even be able to compete with anything the west makes at this point. Russia is behind by 30 years.

  • @EuropeanRailfanAlt
    @EuropeanRailfanAlt ปีที่แล้ว +292

    Russia has to start making more domestically made aircraft since it can't depend on Western aircraft/parts anymore due to sanctions.

    • @d.b.cooper1
      @d.b.cooper1 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Riveting analysis

    • @Frank71
      @Frank71 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@d.b.cooper1
      You'll be surprised how many miss that.

    • @edc1569
      @edc1569 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Problem is modern jets are really really complicated, the material science is in another dimension. Russia can’t complete all by themselves.

    • @Frisher1
      @Frisher1 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@edc1569Which is why you can just hire good engineers or engineers from different countries/ ex engineers from companies to do that for you, it's not like they can't do that

    • @ethercruiser1537
      @ethercruiser1537 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

  • @bigmungus4864
    @bigmungus4864 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Didn’t know their are so many aircraft experts in the chat 😂

    • @jojocactus7815
      @jojocactus7815 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Probably they were part of the project, that's why they knew it.😆

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They have designed countless jet planes and flown them. Didn't you know?😂😂😂

    • @Star737_yt
      @Star737_yt 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zerpentsa6598 like the supersonic one crashing during the airshow?

    • @SN57ONE
      @SN57ONE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean, it is your country only. You guys tend to think you know better than everyone.

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Star737_yt like concorde?

  • @peterkrey7273
    @peterkrey7273 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    Love the quad! Have gotten bored with nothing but twins and miss the originals. Retro? Yes, but to me, beautiful.

    • @Rusich945
      @Rusich945 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      4 engines, it's safer dude

    • @januarioqueiroz3122
      @januarioqueiroz3122 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You bet! I did Love it too!😊

    • @alexv1269
      @alexv1269 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Bigger planes have 4 engines

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    45m cabin length......while A340-200 has 46m

    • @CheapBastard1988
      @CheapBastard1988 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      😂 And that's the short one with CFM engines!

    • @DiminishingAugmentation
      @DiminishingAugmentation ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Wrong. It's 63.93m, very close to the A340-300's 63.69m

    • @hamslice863
      @hamslice863 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Cabin length and fuselage length are two different things@@DiminishingAugmentation

    • @tayikolla6205
      @tayikolla6205 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. But the Russian plane has two genders only.

    • @PenskePC17
      @PenskePC17 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Spooky

  • @fata__morgana
    @fata__morgana ปีที่แล้ว +84

    I love this, make planes weird again. Kinda bored with a320s and 737s...

    • @slamtilt01
      @slamtilt01 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what I loved about the old Soviet Union era aircraft. They looked so strange. It was like Boeing, Lockheed and BOAC knew that the KGB had infiltrated their companies. So they purposefully made up plans for their spies to find. Once they got the bogus plans back behind the iron curtain. They soon realized the problem, but they made them work anyway.

    • @getv1973
      @getv1973 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes build more yu.....

    • @lv7603
      @lv7603 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It’s comes down to fuel efficiency weirdness isn’t profitable which is why they have no place.

    • @pedropalotes7638
      @pedropalotes7638 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@lv7603no place? Why are B-747 and A-340 in service yet? In 2019 or 2020 even were announced new orders of B-747

    • @EJayMD-11
      @EJayMD-11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@pedropalotes7638LMFAO. Who's gonna tell him?

  • @rodolfoptx
    @rodolfoptx ปีที่แล้ว +287

    Staying with four engines probably means some trust and thrust issues 😂

    • @julienckjm7430
      @julienckjm7430 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Why do others have 2 engines? Why don't they just keep one single engine after all if there is so much trust and thrust?

    • @aro8000
      @aro8000 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@julienckjm7430 More engines - more safety - more flexibility - higher production costs - higher operating costs - higher noise - higher environmental pollution.

    • @jasonbass908
      @jasonbass908 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Another gas guzzler
      If the IL 96 was any good Aeroflot would still be useing them the only commercial airline still useing it is CUBANA and the only reason they are is because they can't get anything to replace it

    • @Grivian
      @Grivian ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@julienckjm7430 Redundancy. Same reason why humans have two of almost anything

    • @Fra93TheGrande
      @Fra93TheGrande ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

  • @jakl2369
    @jakl2369 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    Beautiful plane. Quad jets always look better and safer. I love the short sharp nose.

    • @howlr747
      @howlr747 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You think this outdated junk with old engines, old fuselage, old systems is 'safe'? Good luck with that one.

    • @Rusich945
      @Rusich945 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@howlr747 do you mean the 1967 Boeing 737?

    • @darkfatality570
      @darkfatality570 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@howlr747 Boeing IS Better????
      😂😂😂😂
      Not now

    • @yolomcswaggens9482
      @yolomcswaggens9482 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @howlr747 My guy you're lagging some 30 years

    • @BaronEvola123
      @BaronEvola123 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a myth. Look it up. 2 engines mean less problems.

  • @thexchox1554
    @thexchox1554 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    I love the Il-96. At least the Cubana and Aeroflot versions I flew on. Comfy and love the air vent in front of me! Hopefully this one will have better IFE and WiFi maybe!

    • @benjicool2808
      @benjicool2808 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      wifi hahah

    • @thexchox1554
      @thexchox1554 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@benjicool2808 Well to be fair… most airlines in North America are only getting it now.

    • @Jaso007
      @Jaso007 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@benjicool2808are you laughing about western over prized craps,?

    • @rocketman1058
      @rocketman1058 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      russian planes will never have WiFi

    • @thexchox1554
      @thexchox1554 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@rocketman1058 Some already do though…

  • @harstoft
    @harstoft ปีที่แล้ว +268

    36 years later Russia releases the A340

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones ปีที่แล้ว +87

      A340 is made by several European countries. Russia made this plane alone. Only US and Russia can do that.

    • @southside2459
      @southside2459 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@evelinamillionesyou didn’t get the joke

    • @wadehiggins1114
      @wadehiggins1114 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@southside2459she/him shim is american

    • @southside2459
      @southside2459 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@wadehiggins1114 I don’t get your joke

    • @chakraborty1989
      @chakraborty1989 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Tell me you know nothing about IL96 without telling you know nothing about IL96

  • @imranzaki3687
    @imranzaki3687 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    What is the performance of the power plants? Service ceiling? Range? Maintenance cycle? Operating cost on short and long hauls…?

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why? Are you thinking of buying one?

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Better than the rubbish Pratt & Whitney

  • @muhammadaslamtariq8035
    @muhammadaslamtariq8035 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    It is based on basic IL-86 aircraft produced by Russia in 1980 for Olympic-1980 games held in Moscow

    • @nts821
      @nts821 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      737 is in production since 60s.

    • @sdaiwepm
      @sdaiwepm ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The Olympics that popularized Adidas in Russia!

    • @DannoAviation
      @DannoAviation ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It’s based on the IL-96.

    • @quangminhnguyen2504
      @quangminhnguyen2504 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The other way around@@DannoAviation

  • @Pilot-2020
    @Pilot-2020 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    I wouldn't be surprised if russias aviation industry will look like it did in the 1970's once again

    • @harrisonofcolorado8886
      @harrisonofcolorado8886 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      If that also means more crashes than the entire 737 series 3 fold, then I also expect that too if Russia's aviation industry turns back to the 1970s.

    • @Rusich945
      @Rusich945 ปีที่แล้ว

      clown are you blind? the Russian plane is superior to its competitors and therefore will never be allowed into the West

    • @arvedludwig3584
      @arvedludwig3584 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Doubt it. Their workforce is rapidly decreasing.

    • @TheRVSN
      @TheRVSN ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@arvedludwig3584 How can workforce be decreasing (with constant technology) while production is increasing?

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Rusich945 Superior, by what? Tell me.

  • @Comrade_Alex_228
    @Comrade_Alex_228 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Fun fact: first version of IL-96 (without the modification) take his first fly in 1988, Soo al who say what is IL-96 is airbus A340, is wrong

    • @alisastebuklu8618
      @alisastebuklu8618 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Of course it is not. Not even close. This is flying tin can compared to boing or airbus

  • @FirestarterAJ12
    @FirestarterAJ12 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    Wow, those engines look like they are from the 70s

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones ปีที่แล้ว +43

      They are military and super reliable

    • @maestromecanico597
      @maestromecanico597 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      The whole plane looks like its from the 70s.

    • @brittsaunders4621
      @brittsaunders4621 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Actually, the PS90A turbofan engine "family" was developed by the Soloviev Design Bureau in the mid-1980s. It was the Soviet Union's first commercial high bypass turbofan.

    • @thexchox1554
      @thexchox1554 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@brittsaunders4621 By that standard… you can say the Trent family was developed from the RB211’s of the 1970s

    • @karloarsch1579
      @karloarsch1579 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maestromecanico597 Yes, minus the winglets...

  • @Caswell_Official
    @Caswell_Official 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1999 called, it wants its airplane back

  • @tylerdurden4006
    @tylerdurden4006 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I'm just here for the ridiculous american racism that makes them think no one else in the world is capable of technology of any kind. 🤷🤣

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Russia is capable of technology... of the 90s

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@azurefire7266 thank you proving me right about american racism. 👏

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@azurefire7266 immediately

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@azurefire7266 nevermind america uses bombers from the early 50's

    • @moekitsune
      @moekitsune ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@tylerdurden4006They only use them because they've done extensive modernizations.

  • @mughug9616
    @mughug9616 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sounds like these could be existing un-used Il-96-400T cargo versions converted to carry passagers. No indication these are new constructions. Most likely because of the embargo and Russian not being able to access Boeing or Airbus aircraft and parts. Both versions use Russian made electronics, etc.

  • @bikingmoments
    @bikingmoments ปีที่แล้ว +87

    I’m hoping its aged platform can mean more reliability and won’t kill too many people.

    • @MODECHARLIE
      @MODECHARLIE ปีที่แล้ว +72

      The IL86/96 platform has never killed anybody.

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Good point and here's the there were no fatal accidents involving the airframe on the other hand the Airbus equivalent A330/A340 family had serious accidents.

    • @johnstuartsmith
      @johnstuartsmith ปีที่แล้ว +44

      @@EpicThe112 In the last 35 years, only 33 il-96s have ever been made, while Airbus has delivered over 1,800 330s and 340s. The fewer airplanes, the lesser the chances of airplane accidents.

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@MODECHARLIE true...but there again, they don't fly much, do they...?!

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnstuartsmith Thanks for telling me about that

  • @ramatgan1
    @ramatgan1 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Russia makes its own cars, ships, planes, tanks, missiles everything you can think of they make it.
    The country is amazing.
    Watching from Somalia.

    • @Dave-du4xw
      @Dave-du4xw ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Then Why Do Russians Have To Steal Toilets And Washing Machines From Ukraine??? Ha, Ha

    • @irokpe6977
      @irokpe6977 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol. They can't compete globally like the Japanese, Chinese and Americans

    • @jean-vincent7830
      @jean-vincent7830 ปีที่แล้ว

      Egypt and Turkey are also watching trust me my somalian brother, the corruption and fraud are real

    • @jeanpierrelaolou5490
      @jeanpierrelaolou5490 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, cars, computer, cellphone everything.

    • @weskolodziej
      @weskolodziej 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@jeanpierrelaolou5490 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @christopherzhao3135
    @christopherzhao3135 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    4 engine, 3 flight crews… feels like 1980s instead of 2023

    • @DanMaverick22
      @DanMaverick22 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      More safety, I approve.

    • @Sedna063
      @Sedna063 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@DanMaverick22this isn’t about safety

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@Sedna063 дело...

  • @juanpablocorreiaecheverria2857
    @juanpablocorreiaecheverria2857 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Welcome to the 1980s Russia!

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Does your country produce planes on its own? In 2023

    • @abissuminvocat
      @abissuminvocat ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You are not welcome.

    • @hansloyalitat9774
      @hansloyalitat9774 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      You do realize most of the planes you fly in the west were originally designed in the 60s-80s?

    • @dylan8389
      @dylan8389 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@evelinamilliones Is the Russian bot’s feelings hurt by its own country’s hilarious incompetence at building anything?

    • @beibotanov
      @beibotanov ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dylan8389 thanks to the sanctioning, this incompetence is to be overcame at least in critical sectors. Demand creates supply! And workforce deficit makes blue-collar wages soar.

  • @skivijimmy
    @skivijimmy ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I equate Russian technology to that of Klingon technology in the Star Trek universe. It works but it's crude

    • @harstoft
      @harstoft ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Plus it’s mostly stolen!

    • @abissuminvocat
      @abissuminvocat ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harstoft The West stole 600 billion state reserves from Russia. Themselves are fools.

    • @princesofthepower3690
      @princesofthepower3690 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@harstofttired old trope at this point.

    • @yuratg
      @yuratg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stop reading comics and it will pass

  • @Yassified3425
    @Yassified3425 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Ticket prices due to fuel burn will probably be higher now, unless the state starts ticket subsidies.

    • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
      @Sanyu-Tumusiime ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It's probably the only option for Russians to travel. People WILL pay the higher prices, if it's their sole option. Besides, that profits that this company Ilyushin makes can be used to develop better aircraft.
      Russia will once again dominate aviation.

    • @bradlemmond
      @bradlemmond ปีที่แล้ว +21

      ​@@Sanyu-Tumusiime😂😂😂

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Sanyu-Tumusiime 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm guessing it fly's by burning old cooking-fat oil, collected from restaurants and cafes lol

    • @anggergalih3414
      @anggergalih3414 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@swanvictor887 clown even west europe have their energy supply from russia. they have plenty oil you uneducated people.

  • @eduardjacob8710
    @eduardjacob8710 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    100% Russo ! All parts made in Rússia !

    • @howlr747
      @howlr747 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So avoid! Do not fly on this junk!

  • @lolwhat36
    @lolwhat36 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    it looks so short but long at the same time lmao

    • @edgarguinartlopez8341
      @edgarguinartlopez8341 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is pretty wide, maybe is that. Over 6 meters, I think.

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Could be cuz Russian companies like to make their vertical stabilizers Huge.

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I wonder who's going to get this outside of Russia and my guesses are Cuba possibly Iran and North Korea. For Cubana this might work to replace their 2007 vintage IL-96-300 additionally Irkut MS-21-310s to replace their Tu-204s if Sanctions are lifted MS-21-300 with PW1400G

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Arabic, Indian, Chinese people

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@evelinamillionesno

    • @марат-т7щ5п
      @марат-т7щ5п ปีที่แล้ว

      Пиндос,ты думал что ты властелин мира?

    • @fulger2010
      @fulger2010 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@BabaBol9 there will be the day when the Russian airspace (the most valuable airspace between eastern asia - europe and north america - whole asia) will be allowed only with the Russian made aicrafts ... checkmate!

    • @evgen-cy6so
      @evgen-cy6so ปีที่แล้ว +15

      American rockets with Russian engines - RD 180 to this day! Americans don’t complain and even ask that the RD-180 not be included in the sanctions!

  • @kingdomgateway7677
    @kingdomgateway7677 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I love the plane and I need one.

  • @lv7603
    @lv7603 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Fuel efficiency is boss. I like tri jets but understand why they aren’t popular among carriers.

    • @ВгостяхуСантаса
      @ВгостяхуСантаса ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Russia has its own cheap fuel...

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ВгостяхуСантасаand so?

    • @user-fckyoutubeshit
      @user-fckyoutubeshit ปีที่แล้ว

      It could be cheap only in aviation for jet fuel. Because in gas stations fuel is up to hell prices expensive and not profitable for people cause to bustard government trying to be against of the world and people: native and foreign

    • @player1GR
      @player1GR ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Russian oil is the boss

  • @DavidScott-e5m
    @DavidScott-e5m ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still flying 4 engine jets?

  • @AltDavidMiscavige
    @AltDavidMiscavige ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It’ll probably still lack overhead bins in the middle 😂

  • @somdattsable5540
    @somdattsable5540 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why the engine haven't upgraded yet ??

    • @artip777
      @artip777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Old model PS-90A will change for PD-35 engines. While in testing by now.

  • @notedigominombre947
    @notedigominombre947 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Tipical in Russia: "The brand new very old thing"

    • @bloodst0rm1337
      @bloodst0rm1337 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Welp, most popular Boeing and Airbus models are ancient design too. Just cause why would you change something that works perfectly right?

    • @cnn787-i9e
      @cnn787-i9e ปีที่แล้ว

      Brainwashed

    • @TS-ct4sp5kh2d
      @TS-ct4sp5kh2d 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bloodst0rm1337 👍

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Like brand new 1960s 737 max?
      Or the brand new 320neo from the 80s?

  • @jhons2696
    @jhons2696 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    To me, four engines suggests they don't trust the engines enough to only have two.

    • @thealtchemist.x
      @thealtchemist.x ปีที่แล้ว +39

      They don't have engines that are powerful enough to use just two. The engines on this 400M are the equivalent of the PW2000's

    • @julienckjm7430
      @julienckjm7430 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Why not have only one engine if there is so much trust then?

    • @tupolev12
      @tupolev12 ปีที่แล้ว

      They will probably re engine it with the PD-35

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julienckjm7430use your brain

    • @jettrd_utilitychnl4230
      @jettrd_utilitychnl4230 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this airfraime was engineered for 4. And I'm all for it ! ))

  • @rosisrosarum643
    @rosisrosarum643 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This new IL-96-400M aircraft was equipped with four PS90A engines that already existed but in future could be equipped with the new PD35 engines that are under development and in this case only two engines will be used.

  • @muhammadaslamtariq8035
    @muhammadaslamtariq8035 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The four engine option is no more ideal due more maintenance cost and higher fuel consumption

    • @marxxmann8758
      @marxxmann8758 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's more trustworthy than the twin engine especially crossing vast stretches of water

    • @tenton459
      @tenton459 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Safety.

    • @tenton459
      @tenton459 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      A380 using 4.

    • @Rehunauris
      @Rehunauris ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tenton459 A340 was designed in 1980s.
      Since you edited your message I'll do the same: A380 is no longer in production.

    • @tenton459
      @tenton459 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Rehunauris A380 is back, I believe...

  • @alexx86hater
    @alexx86hater ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Il-96 was outdated design even by the early 90th standards (when it entered production). By today's standards it's just ancient design. Pretty sure when there are going to be talks of actually buying it Aeroflot would try to get out of the deal by stalling the deal with additional requirements like they do now with Tu-204.

    • @eemtech1606
      @eemtech1606 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Due to the four engines?

    • @hansloyalitat9774
      @hansloyalitat9774 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have no other choice, cant buy western planes.

    • @SeanMirrsen
      @SeanMirrsen ปีที่แล้ว +9

      What exactly about its airframe is so outdated? Or what, do you think it's still got soviet-era internals and materials?

    • @x-gamessimulator1067
      @x-gamessimulator1067 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Ru$$ia is the only country that can make airplanes independently.
      Airbus and Boeing outsource many of their components.
      Incredibly, despite the sanctions, they still manage to do something unique!
      😎

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@x-gamessimulator1067 doing like 3 per year

  • @davidh9844
    @davidh9844 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congratulations to the Russians for re-inventing the A340-200.

    • @Isz2134
      @Isz2134 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      400. Pls keep up with conversation 😂

  • @jackdoe3889
    @jackdoe3889 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great. Now return the 700+ aircraft you stole.

    • @Стратегическийвыбор
      @Стратегическийвыбор ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Who stole?

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Стратегическийвыбор russian terrorist state

    • @beibotanov
      @beibotanov ปีที่แล้ว +6

      When the owner refuses to take your money for his things caught in circumstances and cant' be returned - very strange, very Western definition of theft

    • @Стратегическийвыбор
      @Стратегическийвыбор ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@beibotanovда они просто гопники, которые не на того напали.

    • @Стратегическийвыбор
      @Стратегическийвыбор ปีที่แล้ว

      Чучело, ты за базар отвечать собираешься? Или ты, как ваши тупые лидеры, вякнул и в кусты?

  • @sikkzakk
    @sikkzakk ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Kinda looks like its from the 80's...

    • @obroni
      @obroni ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Because it is.

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Because it is, like A320 and a340.
      But still at least not from the 60s, like the 737.

  • @BillyCrabtree-ob6py
    @BillyCrabtree-ob6py ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:55 BUTTER

  • @bonecracker97
    @bonecracker97 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Engines seem quite a bit different. Much lower bypass ratio than the ones used by boeing and airbus

  • @olpkol
    @olpkol ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is the "Ukrainian crisis of 2014"?
    Do you mean Moscow's annexation of the Donbass and Crimea?

    • @beibotanov
      @beibotanov ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So what should have been done? Russia had to withdraw itself from everything to have what, the NATO fleet in Sevastopol?

    • @paulj2948
      @paulj2948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like the "2022 Ukraine situation."

  • @fredferd965
    @fredferd965 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Compare the standard Il-96 against Western aircraft. It doesn't stand up! It's heavy, it's crude, it is inferior.

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah but since russian airlines can’t buy western aircraft it doesn’t matter if it’s inferior

  • @miketel01
    @miketel01 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Wow the engines look pretty low bypass

    • @supa3ek
      @supa3ek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So does your brain !

  • @awu92
    @awu92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Other videos ought to introduce the internal facilities & the service level of flight attendant of Russian Airlines.

  • @francikaa1
    @francikaa1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When I saw 2 engines on one side in the thumbnail, I was hoping it's just clickbait, but unfortunately not.

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why?

  • @countbenjamin1442
    @countbenjamin1442 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How easy will it be to get replacement parts

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      if they order now...they promise to deliver on friday afternoon...on the 12 December....2038....the day before your dentist apointment....

    • @edisonz2006
      @edisonz2006 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Considering it's entirely domestic-made, probably not that hard

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@swanvictor887 😂

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's totally domestic, so on point and fast

  • @edc1569
    @edc1569 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m sure the Iranians will buy some.

    • @Orf-dy7hr
      @Orf-dy7hr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Inchallah

    • @yuratg
      @yuratg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's very expensive

    • @angryralphs2516
      @angryralphs2516 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@yuratgit is made in 1 place. I think it is cheaper. No imported parts needed.

  • @theregnarute
    @theregnarute 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    does it come with plug-in doors?

  • @irandoosty
    @irandoosty ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you I stick with Boeing and Airbus.

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have that option.
      Russia does NOT due to sanctions.

    • @yuratg
      @yuratg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't offer it to you

  • @pavan151
    @pavan151 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    So many haters in the comments but I love that this has 4 engines and was created in the modern age when everyone else goes 2 engine. What would the range on this aircraft be?

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      You may love it, but airlines are interested in twinjets. The 80s are over, mate.
      Range is 5400 nm, so below average for modern widebodies.

    • @gregmiller7123
      @gregmiller7123 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The range is all the way to the crash site! 🤔

    • @johnstone7697
      @johnstone7697 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're asking about range with 4 old fashioned engines? How quaint.

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It's all political because they've been told that Russia is "bad" (meanwhile, USA and Israel are "good", right?). Real aviation enthusiasts love this development and I'm sure would love to fly on one, myself included.

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@dennisrettke There is nothing political about this, the plane is not up for todays standards.

  • @gorgeouscfso
    @gorgeouscfso ปีที่แล้ว +48

    hope russian aviation can be back on its feet once again. always love those giant planes.

    • @DavidOfWhitehills
      @DavidOfWhitehills ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Yeah, that's Ukraine you're thinking of.

    • @GrimYak
      @GrimYak ปีที่แล้ว +12

      if you are thinking antonov thats ukraine.

    • @joe91IM
      @joe91IM ปีที่แล้ว +24

      ​@@DavidOfWhitehillsthat's not ukraine to be honest..that's USSR.

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@joe91IMand now Ukraine

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@DavidOfWhitehills nothing to do with Ukraine, apart from the physical location.

  • @bobtheirish79
    @bobtheirish79 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautiful aircraft

  • @joydasgupta9445
    @joydasgupta9445 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great news! It will help the world from the duopoly that's at present.

  • @ravishingboltchand1320
    @ravishingboltchand1320 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why 4 engines?

  • @kingnat4874
    @kingnat4874 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Is it just me or does it looks abit like the a340?

    • @spitfiremkiv339
      @spitfiremkiv339 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      funnily enough, the plane it's based on (Ilyushin 86) had been flying since before the A340 was even produced.

    • @kingnat4874
      @kingnat4874 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@spitfiremkiv339 Omg so does it means airbus copied them ?😂

    • @MODECHARLIE
      @MODECHARLIE ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lol the A340 looks like it

    • @federico339
      @federico339 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@kingnat4874more like, this is how any standard moden-ish tubeliner with 4 engines would look

    • @kingnat4874
      @kingnat4874 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@federico339 ohh okay

  • @arissulistyo3304
    @arissulistyo3304 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4 engines are out date

  • @Biganeworldwide
    @Biganeworldwide ปีที่แล้ว +3

    4 jet engines means more oparating costs

    • @evelinamilliones
      @evelinamilliones ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Enough fuel in Russia

    • @ollienilson1644
      @ollienilson1644 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@evelinamilliones Yes, and more safty.

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@evelinamillionesno

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว

      Will be subsidized by russian government

  • @paulj2948
    @paulj2948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A plane that was obsolete before ever built in the 1980s is made again. Wonderful financial decision!

  • @matsism
    @matsism ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lovely!

  • @robertphillips2983
    @robertphillips2983 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like it, looks good.

  • @peterwong4779
    @peterwong4779 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Humankind air travel shouldn’t monopoly by Boeing & Airbus,, Welcome Russia , China and Another Country come to developing aircraft for Humankind

    • @amadeusendymion1272
      @amadeusendymion1272 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Russian, humankind, those are two words that should never be used in the same sentence.

  • @hdiallo2008
    @hdiallo2008 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Congrutalions !

  • @amertestas5044
    @amertestas5044 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "New"

  • @wesellanybiz
    @wesellanybiz ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn’t they fit just 2 engines? Any reason they selected 4?

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The base model is a 4 engine plane, you can’t change that easily. Also there is no engine available that’s powerful enough to

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They've built it with spared parts available

  • @nomoreshreksadsadsad
    @nomoreshreksadsadsad ปีที่แล้ว +8

    looks cool! i want one!

  • @Григорий-Старцев-97
    @Григорий-Старцев-97 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Il-96 is an improved Il-86 aircraft, the Il-86 has never crashed in 39,000 flights, and although the Il-96 could fly 18 hours and 9 minutes without refueling, the service life of its engines since the early 90s was too small compared to foreign-made engines, and the Soviet airline Aeroflot after the collapse of the USSR became a business corporation that chose what was profitable, this was before 1994, and the airline began to choose Boeing and Airbus aircraft, and today in Russia they are creating new engines of different power and with a good service life and active production of Il-96 aircraft can resume, until now this aircraft has transported mainly Russian presidents, Boris Yeltsin, Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin

  • @MurraydeLues
    @MurraydeLues ปีที่แล้ว +21

    First thing that crossed my mind. Modernised 707

    • @Orf-dy7hr
      @Orf-dy7hr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After 15 beers?

  • @bu_is
    @bu_is ปีที่แล้ว +2

    suitable for countries under years of heavy sanctions

  • @alexandergrigorov2594
    @alexandergrigorov2594 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Maybe I miss it but what engine this starship is powered with?

    • @TheRVSN
      @TheRVSN ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ПС-90А1

    • @johnbx2795
      @johnbx2795 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rubber bands

    • @Bacchusmbt
      @Bacchusmbt ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A340 hair dryers.

  • @risdosagalavsjilong
    @risdosagalavsjilong 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can i order for private jet ?

  • @320_Crew
    @320_Crew ปีที่แล้ว +10

    4 engines, pretty cool!

  • @tiger629
    @tiger629 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a good receiver of IL-86

  • @christopherescott6787
    @christopherescott6787 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Welcome to 1986.

    • @timb4098
      @timb4098 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Il-96 first flight was in September 1988.

  • @DavidLe-xw2qf
    @DavidLe-xw2qf ปีที่แล้ว

    does this plane need 3 or 4 crews to fly?

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M ปีที่แล้ว

      5

  • @connorgeorge6294
    @connorgeorge6294 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just like most things in Russia - it’s stuck in the past

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When have you last been to Russia to make this comment grounded?

  • @puftepos
    @puftepos ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4 engines with the current oil pricing and with the fierce competition from the twin engine aircrafts;
    Shorter than the competition's aircrafts;
    Less passengers than the competition's aircraft.
    Yeah, the soviet success story. :))))

  • @jeanpierreburel6606
    @jeanpierreburel6606 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At least , it's NOT American !

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว

      And how does that make it better?

    • @stevencramsie9172
      @stevencramsie9172 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@azurefire7266 it doesn’t.

  • @ce1834
    @ce1834 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Straight outta the 90s lol

  • @rdanielh78
    @rdanielh78 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Looks like it is the best airplane maker in the world. No other country has done it on its own.

    • @SouthJerseyTransitFan
      @SouthJerseyTransitFan ปีที่แล้ว

      Aka Boeing 747

    • @superdingo9741
      @superdingo9741 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The USA used to do it on its own. In ol' good days...

    • @rdanielh78
      @rdanielh78 ปีที่แล้ว

      @superdingo9741 Yeah, those simple times, very little technology. You about the time when the first supersonic passenger plane was made all by Russia or earlier?

    • @kowalskidiazdegeras9190
      @kowalskidiazdegeras9190 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Remember when in the 1970's a newly formed conglomerate of small european plane makers made the very first TWIN engine widebody? Yes, without the help of Boeing nor Douglas.
      Ilushin is almost 50 years out of date

  • @YouDingo88
    @YouDingo88 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I hope this time it will be ready for the 1980 Moscow Olympics.

  • @Romeojulietless
    @Romeojulietless ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Well done to them. They have achieved their own modern wide body aircraft where most other developed countries have failed, and without the need for various nations building various parts of the structure 👍

    • @oldowleye3161
      @oldowleye3161 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      lol... ignorance is bold !... 4 engines were done looooooooooong time ago and are not in use anymore for 20 years (exception made to the very large A380) !... if you know nothing about this topic, better no to comment !...

    • @Romeojulietless
      @Romeojulietless ปีที่แล้ว

      I wanted to give u a detailed answer about aviation, my experience and jet engines history .. but decided against wasting my time @@oldowleye3161

    • @superdingo9741
      @superdingo9741 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@oldowleye3161 could you enumerate countries which achieved that?

    • @oldowleye3161
      @oldowleye3161 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@superdingo9741 ...don't cry bot

    • @scarecrow108productions7
      @scarecrow108productions7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@oldowleye3161he's probably one of those Vatniks.

  • @bluebull5633
    @bluebull5633 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The perfect plane to replace the a350

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You are joking, right?

    • @Fra93TheGrande
      @Fra93TheGrande ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol no.

    • @ollienilson1644
      @ollienilson1644 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, and much safer to fly with. Everyone knows that.

    • @azurefire7266
      @azurefire7266 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ollienilson1644 no ones going to pick this over the A350

    • @crysishell9226
      @crysishell9226 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ollienilson1644shut up

  • @PakaBubi
    @PakaBubi ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Vodka burner is rolling lol.

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah man, wow

  • @mkunes2502
    @mkunes2502 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing is guaranteed. The workers who built the plane, were drunk, much of the time. Feel safe? Hahaha!!

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure. Drinking vodka, dancing kalinka, playing with bears and singing Katyusha 🎉

    • @mkunes2502
      @mkunes2502 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ИраИванова-л4к You’ve been to the factory?!

  • @DouglasDC10.30
    @DouglasDC10.30 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I’d actually love to fly this!

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Instasamps do you also joke about the 9/11 attacks?

    • @Instasamps
      @Instasamps ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dennisrettke no I don’t

    • @dennisrettke
      @dennisrettke ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Instasamps Then why make such comment? Do you think it's acceptable?

    • @Instasamps
      @Instasamps ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dennisrettke sorry karen

  • @sdaiwepm
    @sdaiwepm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does it have brakes? Avionics? Engines?

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Нет, ничего нет. Но он полетел

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It uses levitation

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What? Hell no. It's a flying tin. 😂

  • @jaysonjose5675
    @jaysonjose5675 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    While the world is shifting to powerful twin engine jets, Russia is not concern to let say fuel efficiency.

    • @Max-xw3ou
      @Max-xw3ou ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You did not hear the author right. These engines are modified ones, more efficient.

    • @rickymwamba9681
      @rickymwamba9681 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are more fuel efficient than the twin engines!

    • @jaysonjose5675
      @jaysonjose5675 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rickymwamba9681how?

    • @jaysonjose5675
      @jaysonjose5675 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Max-xw3ouit might be more fuel efficient than its predecessor, but i guess current twin engines by rolls royce and GE are still more efficient

    • @Otto_M
      @Otto_M ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@jaysonjose5675а ты не думай, тебе это вредно.

  • @hj8272
    @hj8272 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Third world countries are waiting patiently for this soviet technological miracle. Afghanistan and other industrialized countries can finally stop using camels and donkeys.
    BTW, I have $100 to invest. Can I buy two of those 'airplanes'?

    • @АлексейЕрёменко-е7ю8ц
      @АлексейЕрёменко-е7ю8ц 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ты можешь купить себе пару резиновых дилдо... А на остальные ведро вазелина - и развлекаться

  • @mirekslechta7161
    @mirekslechta7161 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Beautiful resulth of mighty Russia !!!

    • @xdural6269
      @xdural6269 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jakou máte medikaci?

    • @mirekslechta7161
      @mirekslechta7161 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xdural6269 Co létajícího jste vyrobil Vy ? Pokud nic, tak proč neobdivujete tohle nádherné letadlo ? Jaké největší letadlo vyrábí , nebo vyráběl náš stát? Není to maličká a dnes už velmi zastaralá L 410 s turbovrtulovými motory ? Proč bych něsměl obdivovat lidi, kteří v krátké době navzdory sankcím dokázali vyrobit něco, co je evidentně na špičkové úrovni? Víte co? Táhněte do ............ !

  • @eleventy-seven
    @eleventy-seven ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Id trust flying on this more then the new Chinese marrow body.

  • @player1GR
    @player1GR ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cool but why can't you english speaking men call Russian planes correctly. it;s not "ai el 96", it's "il-96", like "eel"

  • @ДмитрийТарев
    @ДмитрийТарев ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Временный вариант для широкофюзеляжных

    • @ИраИванова-л4к
      @ИраИванова-л4к 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Не похоже что англоязычные комментаторы это понимают)

  • @markskanyt
    @markskanyt ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who's gonna buy it outside of Russia?

  • @andrewshockley1256
    @andrewshockley1256 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lol, it's a nothing burger. Like its smaller variant, the 300, nobody beyond Russia and Cuba will buy it because it'll be inefficient, unreliable, and full of maintenance/parts supply problems. Another Russian flop.

  • @tommyx777
    @tommyx777 ปีที่แล้ว

    captain Serghei Sughkoch….was very impress with the plane they said.

  • @alexlong3714
    @alexlong3714 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    With cheap Russian Oil, it's does not matter about fuel cost, does it ? It will work for the Russian domestic market, no matter what.

    • @rodjarrow6575
      @rodjarrow6575 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are mistaken, because you have no idea about the new Russian aircraft engines of the series: PD-8; PD-10; PD-14; PD-35

  • @gezaeckrich6773
    @gezaeckrich6773 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sehr schöne Flugzeug 👍

  • @jon00tz
    @jon00tz ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Ancient Soviet Cold War technology…….Don’t fly it over my house !

    • @Fay7666
      @Fay7666 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Eh, I've heard good things about the Cubana planes which are only gonna turn 20 recently. It seems like they do take care of them (they kinda have to, considering they can't get replacements easily).

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Fay7666 those planes have little little flight hours

    • @jettrd_utilitychnl4230
      @jettrd_utilitychnl4230 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@henson2k what are you talking about? they are always in the air mostly