The Great Conversation: Marx's On the Jewish Question

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
  • This video is a recording from the February 17th session of The Great Conversation: How Should We Live? We are currently in Volume IV of the series, focusing on themes of Ideology and Emancipation. Join the conversation at www.abigailadamsinstitute.org... and subscribe for more videos!

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @beefjuicer4808
    @beefjuicer4808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    His real name was Moses Mordecai Levi.............

    • @messianic_scam
      @messianic_scam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mordecai my ass you liars the gig is over these Nietzsches are not jews non of them are

    • @davidmango8270
      @davidmango8270 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't trust a nazi to tell me Marx's real name

    • @merychippus
      @merychippus ปีที่แล้ว

      .

    • @matthewgallant3622
      @matthewgallant3622 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wrong, it was Herschel Halevi, later changed to Heinrich Marx.

    • @beefjuicer4808
      @beefjuicer4808 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matthewgallant3622 that was his fathers name clown.

  • @AndyKaknes
    @AndyKaknes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is this the complete video? Is there a longer video of this discussion at the Abigail Adams Institue Home Page? Was this part of a previously offered course at the institute?

    • @abigailadams5752
      @abigailadams5752  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hello! We typically only record the introductions to each session, as to allow for a better discussion between participants! This was part of the Great Conversation series, a 4 semester, 4 volume survey through the Western Intellectual Tradition! We discussed this during Volume IV: Ideology & Emancipation, and will discuss it again in the spring of 2023.

  • @JackCarsonite
    @JackCarsonite 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Marx's vision seems zero sum'ed in regards to our labor and the capital(ist) extracting labor.
    There's no place for value added by commerce and thus presumes that the laborer must lose out in this system. Marx was a fool or a liar.

  • @abi19gotez
    @abi19gotez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry for the horriblr structure of my question.

  • @remingtonsloan8331
    @remingtonsloan8331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wasn't sure if I was going to watch this. Orthodox icons in the background? Okay. I'm in. Excited to hear whatever you have to say.

    • @Trowa71
      @Trowa71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exact opposite for me but I'll give it a chance.
      was good.

    • @messianic_scam
      @messianic_scam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what Orthodox icons?!

    • @tobypedford8596
      @tobypedford8596 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same thought

    • @chingonbass
      @chingonbass ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Trowa71 same, it's just more jew nonsense under a different banner

    • @Trowa71
      @Trowa71 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chingonbass Jew nonsense? I don't think we are on the same page. It's religious nonsense in general, no individual religion is specifically bad. They are all equally bad.

  • @abi19gotez
    @abi19gotez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I found your video because I am seeking to find the possible connection between marx, in his analysis, not necessarily as go to for political orientation, and ancient ways of life of the Jewish. I suspect the hate that Romans, and other civilizations hated about the Jewish was that they figured out a way of being free, and happy, by living a simple life.

    • @flaviodrusovalerio2825
      @flaviodrusovalerio2825 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Romans did not hate the Jews, as they did not hate the Gauls, the Hiberians, the British Celts, the Greeks or the Egyptians. They found nothing specifical in the Jews, they just handled their revolt the old way. Jesus instead had lot to say about Jews way of life.

    • @abi19gotez
      @abi19gotez 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well if we are going to get technical about language, let us remember that this is not exactly an academic, nor genuinely intellectual venue. Therefore, no one will be able to tear down a whole notion, and the importance what is expressed by nit picking at words. Especially when we are trying to speak in ways that the internet generation can understand. If the Romans hated all such cultures it is because they were considered a danger to their monopoly. The Jewish ways, however, showed an alternative that, in spirit, philosophically goes against the wealth, and power Romans, and their competitors were all about. During those times, however, the Roman influence began to seduce many of the Jewish leaders, and that is part of what Christ did not accept.

    • @abi19gotez
      @abi19gotez 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flaviodrusovalerio2825 Thys is not an academyc venue. So do not even try, being disrespectful, by nit picking at people's comments. It is so typical of systemic thought to consider irrelevant any notiion that does not fit its paradigm of power. The Romans were constantly warring for economic domain, and seduced Jewish leaders away from their frugal, if practical way of living.

  • @letdaseinlive
    @letdaseinlive 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Super "in the weeds" tush here. This separation of "State" from society makes the West a laughing stock to the Islamist of exceedingly strange manfulness.

    • @tiktoksbytopic1897
      @tiktoksbytopic1897 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s called integrity and humanity lol

    • @muhammadabuzarkhan7450
      @muhammadabuzarkhan7450 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would say it's other things like liberalism instead. I know many secular states that did great. Europe was greater than any Islamic society we ever built only because the European had greater Ethics by strictly following their religion more and even when they lose their religion they still had those ethics for a while.
      Muslim barely followed their own religion after the murder of Caliph Ali, son in law of Muhammad. But many Muslim majority society which had strong ethics even though they were living Islam behind were still doing great. Like Iraq before the invasion.
      It boils down to the ethics of society.

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Liberalism opened the door to Commercial ethics of Society and State as the police of the wealthy. As against the ethics of the Whole Country as Dugin is guided by.

  • @messianic_scam
    @messianic_scam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    of course marx wasn't jew non of them are he was anti-Semitic anti jew

    • @pierre3982
      @pierre3982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Marx est juif ,un juif lucide ,espèce très rare

    • @messianic_scam
      @messianic_scam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pierre3982
      no he wasn't his father and mother were Christian baptized

    • @messianic_scam
      @messianic_scam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Critique Everything
      no he wasn't ,non of them were , even hertzel his grandfather was Serbian christian orthodox but they call him jew today how did that happened I don't know

    • @ppp-ux4ve
      @ppp-ux4ve ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@messianic_scam his grandfather was Orthodox Jew.

    • @ppp-ux4ve
      @ppp-ux4ve ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Marx's family was originally non-religious Jewish, but had converted formally to Christianity before his birth. His maternal grandfather was a Dutch rabbi, Marx's family was originally non-religious Jewish, but had converted formally to Christianity before his birth. His maternal grandfather was a Dutch rabbi, while his paternal line had supplied Trier's rabbis since 1723, a role taken by his grandfather Meier Halevi Marx. while his paternal line had supplied Trier's rabbis since 1723, a role taken by his grandfather Meier Halevi Marx.
      Credit: Wikipedia