Option 2 is beyond me, I just can't imagine that (litteraly). Options 1 and 3 both have the same problem, both propose cycli but it has to have started at one time, there would have to be a first to the cycles, right? What could have started the very first cycle?
@@bentley2495 we might not know the exact process of how chickens came to lay eggs, but we do know that life starts out simple and then gets more complex over billions of years. There has to be a starting point from non-living organic material to self-replecating living organisms. In the same way there has to be a start to the Universe.
Okay so there was energy or a black hole... but how did the energy or black hole appear in the first place? I mean the more you think about it, the more you realise there must've been something that can't be explained by the laws of physics. Leaving the only conclusion that the universe and everything that ever exists was made by something that doesn't need to follow the laws of physics, something you could call God.
Been a big fan of the cyclical black hole theory for many years. All that energy and matter and information swallowed up and into a singularity which then explodes into another big bang and universe. Still, it does little to explain what came before the first big bang.
Not singularity, but ringularity as the universe is rotating as a whole and thus the GR solution becomes a maximally extended Penrose Diagram of the Kerr metric. This is evident from the large scale anisotrophies of the CMB and the spinward direction of galaxies. Add into the mix of entrapped surfaces of spacetime at which point I coined the terms Superverse and Subverse in the development of my Big Bang Kilonova Hypothesis.
I can believe the black hole theory because I always wondered where all information 'matter' goes. If this theory is true then we have an infinity of universes and there is no limit to space & time which is INSANE.
To another dimension. Mathematically blackhole and whirlpool are the same. They follow the same equation. Just like a whirlpool drains water into another area, blackhole must be leaking matters into another dimension. A 3 dimensional hole in our space fabric .
right, and that would render our original question moot because if we are the product of interaction between dimensions, where did those dimensions come from?, no matter which theory we choose to accept, mathematically leads to infinite number of something. so for the time being, we can make up our own theories and choose to accept then for the rest of our life, the only thing we can say surely is that ours is a beautiful and remarkably functioning universe.
@@doctorpanigrahi9975 But the water is not infinite right? It feels weird that the you can create more water from less water and not having it empty after multiple drain that only drains a small fraction of the previous water
I don't think we've got the slightest clue to be honest. Take Haldane's quote: "The universe is not only stranger than we suppose, it's stranger than we can suppose." We've got fun speculation, but it might take thousands more years of new physics to perhaps understand something of it. A dog doesn't know what differential equations are. Likewise, how could we know or apprehend ultimate questions like these?
Why do people think that only physical or meta-physical existence is possible? I think it's entirely possible that an existence or a lot of existences that our human brain in incapable of even dreaming about are there on other planets.
For the bounce theory, it explains how a contracting singularity bounces into expansion and creates the universe as we know it. But it doesn't explain how an expanding universe bounces backwards and shrinks back into a singularity. For that to happen, space and vacuum (possibly even dark matter) must lose energy over time and reach a finite limit in order to shrink back. For the big black hole theory, for it to "spit out" the universe, that black hole must first be immensely large and powerful to have sucked in all the matter in the entire universe from elsewhere first. Thus, implying that an infinitely larger universe exists beyond ours that contains all matter known to us in this universe, and possibly more.
>an infinitely larger universe exists beyond ours that contains all matter known to us in this universe, and possibly more *swells with holographic projection theory*
@@payhemseht wouldn't a projection mean we aren't real. Our interactions and influence on any object suggest we are real, making the projection theory innately wrong?
Quantum Theory allows for the sudden expansion to occur again - in trillions and trillions of years time (seriously, we're talking roughly 10^10^3000 years) , when the heat death is predicted to have happened, the universe will be in a perfectly ordered state and would be full of potential energy. a random quantum fluctuation in the "quantum foam" that underpins everything could start the whole "big bang" process again remember - when the universe has "died" and entropy has ceased, time and dimensions are completely meaningless - just like it's believed to have been before our big bang. the last guy in the video encapsulates it perfectly to me.
@@nocoffeebadday695 unless those interactions are predetermined (recorded), like how in a movie people interact with other people and objects but it's not "real".
The bounce theory can be explained by the constant collisions and following combinations of galaxies that create exponentially larger super black holes at their centers which will pull in one another and result in a collapse of all matter due to the attraction of a super massive black hole that will eventually collapse upon itself and explode thereby creating another Big Bang. Or something like that.
The current mankind has little clue on the space strands they are just finding! Filaments wiring the universe together glowing and now visible to us like never before! We have so much to learn! Other dimensions and dark matter! To learning more and more!
Blasphemy at the highest level and it is getting every day worst and worst I mean you wanna define nothing man and tell us nothing created every thing that we see 🙄 the cost of all this must be uncosted cost which is independent from all of this and all powerful in order to cost this magnificent complex sophisticated universe and that is what we as theist or believers of Creator believe that is Almighty God who costed and created and he Almighty is independent from his creation and we can't comprehend him nor his mighty simple as that
None of them really try to answer where did energy / matter come from. All are based on fact that energy / matter created big bang. Only thing that differs is what big bang was. I'm more interested about "how would energy appear from nothing" not "how unimaginably huge amount of energy created the big bang"
Quantum fluctuations show something can come out of nothing, so my bet is that energy is coming from inaccessible higher dimensions permeating through ours, but that of course just begs the question where did the energy for the higher dimensions come from?
@@1madmaxx80 all “somethings” have an origin though. What created that “nothing?” That’s the point where my brain begins to disintegrate thinking about that.
I have a simple answer personally “In the beginning God created” And before you so quickly cast it out, think for just a moment and consider, is it any crazier than multiple demotions that exist out of our reality? Or energy literally coming from nothing?
Well I think once the James Webb Telescope is up and running we will get some more answers. But I think we are still 100's of years away from figuring out how the universe started. Hope I am wrong as would love to know.
Maybe couple of thousand years more? JWT is just like a photographer lost in a forest , it will click many pictures around of which some could be new to sight . But in the end the question remains , what created the forest . By clicking a picture of new plant species in a forest cannot determine what created the forest.
The ultimate answer Is From Al Quran, the book of God Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” Quran (Surah Al-Anbiya, verse 30)
I'm not confused anymore i just LOL at what was before big bang style play. I mean before Big Bang/s how could something form from nothing technically as something even if its vacuumed and cold and not moving whats causing the vacuumed cold as something holding next layer as nothing whats holding nothing something as so on nothing something and so on even if it blends in dimensions and weaves bounces of in another directions never ends its in crystal form? Maybe and it keeps layer dimensions layers and so on :)How could anything started from 0 which is something first as nothing and so on till our earth aaaaaahhhh lol :)
Now I know you are way more knowledgeable of things than I am but if you have a big bang which the entity we give the designation of universe that if you break down the word or designation NOTHING it doesn't mean that there was zero universe before this big bang it is the designation that we previously gave to the universe to distinguish it as an entity separate from it's members and parts that before this wasn't distinguishable through any designations available because by definition nothing is something it has characteristics attributes it's finite in one two and three dimensions and is self contained separate entity that occupies space but separate from space but shares spatial characteristics just would like to know how far off I am when in my observation in the light of experience through physical interaction with my environment has lead me to this conclusion. The universe existed before this big bang we just didn't call it the universe because prior to the big bang our consciousness couldn't comprehend, categorize and designate a concept so large we called it nothing thank you for your time my name is Christopher Evan Sanders
I w3as once a hardcore atheist. I rode with The Four Horsemen. Then I read about quantum mechanics and watched nutjobs like these people who are unable to even agree on the playing field, let alone the rules of the game and realized that as ridiculous as an overarching creator sounds, the idea is as compelling and unprovable as any of the dreck presented here. This is philosophy. Not science. I realize the two are first cousins, but it's still gross if they kiss.
Genensis 1:3 IN the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. That’s the beginning of your big bang! Gods word.
before I watch this to end, I began to think that the launch of JWST and the hype all around the world and mankind all are useless 10BN usd spacecraft. BBC present all the ultimate answers, simply theres *no need* to explore this universe. And BBC has track records in always has the way to get it done, making something became nothing.
Before this universe, there was another universe that got destroyed then break for billions of years then this Big Bang happened. Cycle of creating. AUM 🙏🏻🙏🏻
big black hole bang seems the most stupid theory, and im really sorry proff Lee smolin , may be im not wise enough to accept your theory of the birth of universe
I read this book that is 3,400 years old and it says that God created the heavens and the earth. So far science is affirming these claims. So strange..
The whole theory is already written in “Quran” On how the universe begins, The Qur'an says that "the heavens and the earth were joined together as one unit, before We clove them asunder" (21:30). Following this big explosion, Allah "turned to the sky, and it had been (as) smoke. He said to it and to the earth: 'Come together, willingly or unwillingly.' They said: 'We come (together) in willing obedience'" (41:11). Thus the elements and what was to become the planets and stars began to cool, come together, and form into shape, following the natural laws that Allah established in the universe. Expansion of Universe "The heavens, We have built them with power. And verily, We are expanding it" (51:47). since knowledge of the universe's expansion was only recently discovered.
This is beyond human capicity... Only GOD is the solution you cannot prove. What was exploding???? How was that exploding thing came into existance????
I think to understand how we came to be we should look where we are heading towards, it would be easier to model and would probably give us the answer we seek. But personally, I am not sure our species will survive before we found the answer...
I like Penrose's CCC, it doesn't rely upon a "bounce" after some mythical contraction that our current accelerating expansion doesn't predict. It too plays around with the concept of nothing, namely that without matter scale doesn't mean anything and a heat-dead universe becomes equivalent to a pre-BB one.
More we know about the universe and space More it feels like a simulation run by alien kid's Minecraft game from a very advance civilization with a good graphic card . And that is correct then our whole universe will be wiped clean after that alien kid is done playing his game or when his mom stops him 😂😂😂 It's kinda sad 😂😂😂
The question "What Came Before The Big Bang?" is the same as asking what was running on computer before turning it on. Universe is simulation based on blockchain - that provides consistency. Our time is an illusion of us being in the movie played.
EXACTLY! "I DONT KNOW IF THE QUESTION EVEN MAKES SENSE" that's what all humans should say With everything, they have theorised since we became conscience.
you could make a religion out of this! . . . . actually I was thinking this kind of complex theories are why lazy minded or actually stupid people choose/accept to believe in religions
This is just nonsense . If the universe is formed from collision of plsama membrane , or from another star of universe, then how was the first universe or star formed .Assumptions everbody can make . And naming words like big bang is just formed from collision of molecules . Lol 😂
I always imagined and believed the black hole theory, but the bounce kind of clicks too. Look up variable oscillating stars. They're these stars that expand and contract like a heartbeat or a set of lungs.
I feel the opposite. I think it’s amazing that humans have come so far that we can see millions of light years away and uncover our own origins. The fact that I’m from that species makes me feel big, capable, and inspired.
@@kehreazerith3016 look dude I won't argue with you...but believe me at the day of judgement you are gonna be In a real trouble.... I hope you understand things before it's too late.. Allah hu Akbar( Allah is the Greatest)
We are limited in our viewpoint. We can only observe the universe in three dimentions. For all we know the true nature of the universe maybe comprised of many more dimentions that we cannot comprehend.
I can see the comments here are being made here are very immature. Those who don't want to discuss theoretical quantum physics can leave. I like to call the cyclic nature of the Universe 'The Tyranny of Design '.
@@ReynoldsJer Physics didn't came out of nothingness cause Physics is an understanding of the physical world progenited by human mind ,if(certainly) you didn't know my good illiterate friend, the forces which dictate the physical world arrived from a infinitesimally reduced quarter of time and space and due to the cyclic nature of our universe and by 'The Tyranny of Design' even if we trace back that small point we will uncover by the 'Big Bounce Theory' and Big Bang theory of Blackholes' a return to presence of a past universe from which our universe was born. And hey idiot, the TH-cam you are using is too dictated by laws of electromagnetic conduction and radiation.
Dinner and a movie? I like to think Black holes have a limit. Once full the nothing on the other side becomes something. BANG. A new universe is born. Only there is no beginning or end. It's been going on forever and we simply don't have the ability to understand what forever really means.
@@volishona Nope. God is part of it not the cause of it all. Evolution is how creation works or vice a versa. Forever means forever. God is just us trying to make sense of forever. There is no cause. No beginning or end. Only forever..... Make the most of it.
@@lknanml there is only one thing that cannot have a begening. An entity that exists since forever on its own. Why it has to be a God? Because nothing else can exist on its own.
@@volishona I have no problems supporting someone who says they believe in GOD. I have second thoughts when I hear someone say GOD is absolute. Open mind vs closed mind..... A closed mind can be a very dangerous state of being when it comes to religion.
The scientific community will bend over backwards to try and deny the existence of a Creator. Theory after theory after theory but continue to deny all the messengers... Past (Big Bang Theory) Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe? [Quran 21 : 30 ] Present (Hubble's Law) And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander. [Quran 51 : 47 ] Future The Day when We will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written] sheet for the records. As We began the first creation, We will repeat it. [That is] a promise binding upon Us. Indeed, We will do it. [Quran 21 : 104 ] " And We have placed within the heaven great stars and have beautified it for the observers." Quran 15:16 "Are you a more difficult creation or is the heaven? Allah constructed it. He raised its ceiling and proportioned it. And He darkened its night and extracted its brightness." Quran 79 : 27 - 29
I still think our universe expands forever untill another universe erupts into being. Our universe now is just expanding into the vast emptiness of a universe before ours.
I know this sounds crazy but in metaphorical terms I look at the universe like a tree, with stems of dark matter and branches of gravity, flowering with galaxies that are full of petals containing lots of pollen, the pollen being us 😀
God almighty says, *Do not the disbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were a closed-upmass (ratqan), then We opened them out (fafataqnahuma)?* *And We made from water every living thing will they not then believe?* Quran (21:30) What few people know however is that the Holy Quran described the Big Bang perfectly, 1400 years earlier. Its a big sign that Quran is word of God. Next we turn to the meaning of “and then We opened them up” for which the arabic is fafataqnahuma. This means that something is cloven asunder. Lane’s Lexicon describes the essential meanings as the cleaving asunder of something united to make it disunited. The word is in the dual, applying it grammatically to the ‘heaven and the earth’ just described as a closed-up mass. So far, so startling. This is a pretty perfect description of the Big Bang. The cosmos was indeed a closed-up mass, ie: a highly dense and tiny point which has opened up to produce the wider universe. 👉God Almighty speaks to the Mankind: *This then is, Allah, your Lord; there is no deity but He is the Creator of everything : so worship Him alone, for He is the Guardian of all things, No sight can comprehend Him but He comprehends all sorts of sight, for He is All-Comprehensive and All-Aware.* Quran 6 (102-103) *“How can you disbelieve in Allah Seeing that you were dead and He gave you life. Then He will give you death, then again will bring you to life and then unto Him you will return.”* Quran (2:28) *And Allah has brought you out from the wombs of your mothers while you know nothing. And He gave you hearing👂, sight👁, and hearts❤ that you might give thanks (to Allah)."* Quran (16:78) 👉God Almighty says to the Mankind, Say(O Prophet), *“Allah gives you life, then causes you to die, then He will assemble you on the Day of Resurrection about which there is no doubt.”* Quran (45:26) *"In the name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful."* This Message is from the slave and Messanger of Allah Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) to the Mankind. Peace be upon him, who follows the right path. Furthermore I invite you to Islam, and if you become a Muslim you will be safe, and Allah will double your reward, and if you reject this invitation of Islam you will be committing a sin. (And I recite to you Allah's Statement:) 👉Allah almighty our creator says, *Say, "O people of the Book! Come to what is common between us and you, that we worship none but Allah; that we associate nothing with Him and that none of us shall make as our Lord any other than Allah."* *If they reject your invitation, then tell them plainly, "Bear witness that we are Muslims (who worship and surrender to Allah alone)."* Qur'an (3:64) 👉Allah almighty says, *Your real Deity is but One. He Who is Lord of the earth and the heavens and of all that is between them, and Lord of all Easts.* Qur'an (37:5) Once we die our creator will again resurrect us on the Judgment day.And on that day if you have believed in Allah and have followed his book Quran then you will be succeed in the hereafter life. Hereafter life is the eternal life either in Paradise or hellfire depending upon the good amd bad deeds you did in this world. 👉God Almighty says to the Mankind, Say(O Prophet), *“Allah gives you life, then causes you to die, then He will assemble you on the Day of Resurrection about which there is no doubt.”* Quran (45:26)
The clip has got very very low audio level. I have to volume up 3 times higher than normal, which caused sound burst when an advertisement cut in. Couldn't finish this interesting program. It's too harsh to my speakers.
This is why people turn towards religion - they get all the answers of all the questions they have .... Moreover they get answers for the quotations they don't have.
I believe in science but some things will never be known and are only theoretical. Scientist always say it's a cop out but the missing piece for me is God. There are scientist that say they see God's hands in all science. I think even if they ever do find out what started everything will only open up more questions cause human brains are not built to comprehend things on such magnificent scales
@@Swampsong117 well I guess you only understood the most basic of things there. I didn't say God did everything did I. I also said it was my opinion. Plenty of scientist believe that as well. I said there are questions that we will never have an answer to and for me God has those but doesn't mean I would just stop trying to figure it out so go ahead and act like liberal and cut somebody down for not having your same thoughts. It's okay. Your brain probably doesn't have intelligence in it to grasp what I was saying anyway but have a nice day and enjoy your time on earth cause hell is gonna suck for you
There are fairly easy issues with these theories. The rebounding universe. The problem with this theory is that time its self would need to flow backwards for universe to shrink back down, which goes against entropy. The second issue is the universe is actually older than 13.5 billion years. This is just as far as we can see. Its because light from galaxies farther away has yet had time to reach earth. The reason why the universe is older than 13.5 years is because that is how far the distant galaxy was as they were measured from earth, however the universe has been expanding while that light was traveling to earth. This means those distant galaxies are much farther than we measured. Thus the universe is much older than the CMB. Its like being on a beach and looking at the horizon and thinking that horizon is the end of the earth. The membrane theory flaw is that we can’t prove there are higher dimensions. In our 4 dimensional spacetime we only can move freely in 3 of those dimensions, but we can only move forward in time. We can’t move freely to the past or future, yet we know what time is and it affects our daily lives. A 5th, 6th, or 7th dimension? We wouldn’t even know what to look for. We can’t prove that it does exist, but we can’t prove it doesn’t exist. To me it’s no different than thinking a god created the universe. The issue with the black hole theory is it’s exactly the same as the chicken and egg. What came first the chicken or the egg. The black hole or the universe . What created the first universe? Most would figure, must be a black hole. But nothing can escape a black hole, not even light, and black holes evaporate over an absurdly long period of time via Hawking’s radiation. It’s more likely the universe doesn’t exist if we were a black hole. It would stay nothing. If the universe came first, what made the universe? The Big Bang?
What came before the big bang? Either god, an existence that came before us, or maybe our entire universe is just 1 tiny bubble among many. Or maybe the big bang never happened as we imagine it
The big bang is a flawed concept which will have to be removed from science books in a few years , same as the universe being a random occurance is no longer considered scientific hence the invention of the " multiverse" The big bang needs an big bang particle since the the universe is " expanding " yes but its not from the big bang 😂 We also have to find dark matter first and we haven't !
The big bang is a flawed concept which will have to be removed from science books in a few years , same as the universe being a random occurance is no longer considered scientific hence the invention of the " multiverse" The big bang needs an big bang particle since the the universe is " expanding " yes but its not from the big bang 😂 We also have to find dark matter first and we haven't ! Plus , scientists are starting to think it occured somewhere around earth😂😂
the thing with ideas is that it's really good to bring up ideas in ways to make people think less of what they don't know. But let's just agree nobody will ever know what really happened.
I don't thing that universe can be created by big bang, this world is so so detailed that I can't believe that life soul and nature was created by an explosion 💥 👉 🌎
Nothing created every thing...... Nothing set all laws of physics begore big bang.... But boting is uncreated...existed always.. Replace Nothing with God Is more logical...
I have 3 more suggestions. 1. Before the Big Bang was God. Science and Math have a hard time reconciling this because math, not yet at least, can define "God." 2. Before the big bang was nothing. 3. We will discover more evidence later in time that will adjust our definition and understanding of the big bang, and it'll change this entire narrative. I'm a science teacher who believes in science, evidence, and fact based information. I also believe in God but not in the same way any man made religion teach "God." I'm also open to the possibility that everything happened before the big bang, and all the big bang is really asymptotic to the observable universe. That's the limit for us, and others will have a relativistic point of view. Until we put all the data together from everywhere, we'll never answer this question without debate and skeptical questions.
“…Thomas [Aquinas] establishes that the first efficient cause of being must itself be pure act.1 He contends that anything in motion (broadly conceived as anything that changes whatsoever) must have previously been in passive potency to that motion and thus moved to that motion by some source of actuality external to itself. As Thomas states, “Nothing can be reduced from potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality.” Nothing can be made actual except by something already actual. Furthermore, it is “impossible that in the same respect and in the same way a thing should be both mover and moved, i.e., that it should move itself.” An external agent already in act is required for the reduction of potency to act. Anything put in motion (i.e., anything previously in passive potency) is put in motion by another and, as Thomas notes, “that by another again.”2 But this chain of movers cannot go on infinitely, or there would be no first mover-that is, no ultimately sufficient reason for movement.3 Since the first mover is necessarily unmoved by another, and since all movement comes from some mover in act, that first mover must be pure act (actus purus).” 1 Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae Ia.2.3, in translation as Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Allen, Tex.: Christian Classics, 1981). 2 Aquinas, Summa theologiae Ia.2.3 3 Aquinas’s argument is not that God is the first cause or mover in a mere chronological sense but rather that He is the first inasmuch as He is the most fundamental source and explanation of contingent being wherever and whenever it is found. This understanding of Aquinas’s claim controverts the old accusation that his Five Ways teach that God is the first link on the great chain of being with creatures and thus stands univocally with them in the same order of being. See the discussion in Brian Davies, Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Guide and Commentary (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 34-50. See also Richard A. Muller, “The Dogmatic Function of St. Thomas’ ‘Proofs’: A Protestant Appreciation,” Fides et Historia 24 (1992): 15-29. Excerpt From James E. Dolezal www.goodreads.com/book/show/35783848 Chapter 2
Shame the BBC does not do so much science content anymore. No the employees would rather take the corporation to court and moan about equal pay giving the BBC and its legal department the chance to waste license fee payers contributions on really silly internal bickering. Well done to the older BBC employees that got to buy out the rights to buy the original BBC production facilities and rights dirt cheap at the turn of the centaury. I never forget the only advert on the BBC about it being able to make its own content funded by the British public and as soon as that finished they sold it all off. Now you have Brit box and Getty Images that have magically got rights to that originally funded content and they can profit from that and not only that they sell it back to the British license fee payers. I actually phoned the BBC and asked when the British public were going to get a rebate on their license fee. I stated that why can Brit Box , Getty Images and other stream sites get to make money privately from Original BBC shows such as Doctor Who and other long running shows . I got laughed at and the guy on the BBC complaint line said well these shows are not produced by the BBC . I then said firstly we should get cash back just because of the likes of Rolf Harris and Jimmy Saville . The laughing immediately ceased . I then pointed out that until Dr Who was revived it was produced by the BBC and I mentioned other historic shows shown on Brit Box including the earlier seasons of Dr Who and to this the man on the phone couldnt answer. I am very very upset that the BBC now has very very little to offer . The people who now run it have stolen from the license paying public and they think thats absolutely their right. The BBC is now just a piggy bank for whoever gets to run it . I also dont get why they are buying content from Sony who now have a bigger percentage of the broadcast media on television in the UK and dont get ANY license fee money from that. I also dont get how the BBC blatantly use product placement in some shows and Spooks is one I complained about as all the phones and computers where Apple Products in one season and the logo at the office in the supposed MI5 headquarters was full of it. I was told again the show wasn't produced by the BBC and the show was just representing real life. But im sure at the time it was another direct competitor with Apple that had contacts for technology with British Government departments . BBC the only shows you screen now worth any viewing time are your science shows Horizon and Sky at Night being the best but even now I have seen a episode of Horizon on a channel in the USA that has just had the narration dubbed to suit that countries demographic and it wasn't called Horizon . Shame on the current chiefs at the BBC you are criminal . Shame that this TH-cam content funded in the original British way gets sold to the highest bidder to line your grubby, greedy pockets instead of being used to fund ORIGINAL British television , media , news and education like it used to. Im speaking on the behalf of the public.
Option 2 is beyond me, I just can't imagine that (litteraly). Options 1 and 3 both have the same problem, both propose cycli but it has to have started at one time, there would have to be a first to the cycles, right? What could have started the very first cycle?
I think is kinda like a circle... u can't tell where it began and where it ended.. there's virtually no starting point...
All 3 seem outrageous.
That’s like asking, “which came first? The chicken or the egg?” But really nobody knows. Yet the reproductive cycle still exists.
@@bentley2495 we might not know the exact process of how chickens came to lay eggs, but we do know that life starts out simple and then gets more complex over billions of years.
There has to be a starting point from non-living organic material to self-replecating living organisms. In the same way there has to be a start to the Universe.
God farted and were specks of poop
If no answer is found then the creation answer makes sense actually.
Ancient people have a more metaphorical understanding of the genesis of our universe
Seriously bruh?
I’m excited what we learn from the JWST about this topic
Okay so there was energy or a black hole... but how did the energy or black hole appear in the first place? I mean the more you think about it, the more you realise there must've been something that can't be explained by the laws of physics. Leaving the only conclusion that the universe and everything that ever exists was made by something that doesn't need to follow the laws of physics, something you could call God.
Been a big fan of the cyclical black hole theory for many years. All that energy and matter and information swallowed up and into a singularity which then explodes into another big bang and universe. Still, it does little to explain what came before the first big bang.
The response is maybe that we the wording ”came at first” is misleading as our conception of time is biased. As Einstein said time is an illusion.
@@sapiensholmiensis9460 yes in ultimate truth time is an illusion and in convention truth time is real.
Not singularity, but ringularity as the universe is rotating as a whole and thus the GR solution becomes a maximally extended Penrose Diagram of the Kerr metric. This is evident from the large scale anisotrophies of the CMB and the spinward direction of galaxies. Add into the mix of entrapped surfaces of spacetime at which point I coined the terms Superverse and Subverse in the development of my Big Bang Kilonova Hypothesis.
Before the first big bang there may be nothing physical not even energy only consciousness later energy matter and here we are now
@@ramprambola2282 what consciousness? that's new-agey, or quaintly old-agey.
I can believe the black hole theory because I always wondered where all information 'matter' goes. If this theory is true then we have an infinity of universes and there is no limit to space & time which is INSANE.
To another dimension. Mathematically blackhole and whirlpool are the same. They follow the same equation. Just like a whirlpool drains water into another area, blackhole must be leaking matters into another dimension. A 3 dimensional hole in our space fabric .
That's my theory , because a long time ago I asked the same question to myself and that's the answer I came up with. Ping me to convey your opinion :)
right, and that would render our original question moot because if we are the product of interaction between dimensions, where did those dimensions come from?, no matter which theory we choose to accept, mathematically leads to infinite number of something. so for the time being, we can make up our own theories and choose to accept then for the rest of our life, the only thing we can say surely is that ours is a beautiful and remarkably functioning universe.
Swear she’s in porn
@@doctorpanigrahi9975 But the water is not infinite right? It feels weird that the you can create more water from less water and not having it empty after multiple drain that only drains a small fraction of the previous water
"Humans are at their most endearing when they attempt to understand subjects beyond their reasoning skills." -Anon
Don’t say it,
don’t say it,
don’t say it,
… the Big Black Hole Bang, hey? 😏
Multiverse makes more sense in some cases. There is more than one of the same thing in our Universe so why should our Universe itself be the only one.
Do not fool your self people , God created everything , how could something come from nothing ,
I don't think we've got the slightest clue to be honest. Take Haldane's quote: "The universe is not only stranger than we suppose, it's stranger than we can suppose."
We've got fun speculation, but it might take thousands more years of new physics to perhaps understand something of it. A dog doesn't know what differential equations are. Likewise, how could we know or apprehend ultimate questions like these?
Why do people think that only physical or meta-physical existence is possible? I think it's entirely possible that an existence or a lot of existences that our human brain in incapable of even dreaming about are there on other planets.
@@shubhammishra5127 Perhaps, but how would you confirm those besides imagining them?
Please cite your sources on the dog comprehension issue.
@@paulryan2128 Common sense? Have you seen a dog solve differential equations?
Because we are capable of asking the questions. Don't sell yourself short.
For the bounce theory, it explains how a contracting singularity bounces into expansion and creates the universe as we know it. But it doesn't explain how an expanding universe bounces backwards and shrinks back into a singularity. For that to happen, space and vacuum (possibly even dark matter) must lose energy over time and reach a finite limit in order to shrink back.
For the big black hole theory, for it to "spit out" the universe, that black hole must first be immensely large and powerful to have sucked in all the matter in the entire universe from elsewhere first. Thus, implying that an infinitely larger universe exists beyond ours that contains all matter known to us in this universe, and possibly more.
>an infinitely larger universe exists beyond ours that contains all matter known to us in this universe, and possibly more
*swells with holographic projection theory*
@@payhemseht wouldn't a projection mean we aren't real. Our interactions and influence on any object suggest we are real, making the projection theory innately wrong?
Quantum Theory allows for the sudden expansion to occur again - in trillions and trillions of years time (seriously, we're talking roughly 10^10^3000 years) , when the heat death is predicted to have happened, the universe will be in a perfectly ordered state and would be full of potential energy. a random quantum fluctuation in the "quantum foam" that underpins everything could start the whole "big bang" process again remember - when the universe has "died" and entropy has ceased, time and dimensions are completely meaningless - just like it's believed to have been before our big bang.
the last guy in the video encapsulates it perfectly to me.
@@nocoffeebadday695 unless those interactions are predetermined (recorded), like how in a movie people interact with other people and objects but it's not "real".
The bounce theory can be explained by the constant collisions and following combinations of galaxies that create exponentially larger super black holes at their centers which will pull in one another and result in a collapse of all matter due to the attraction of a super massive black hole that will eventually collapse upon itself and explode thereby creating another Big Bang. Or something like that.
the last two dudes just sound insane
Speaks how mature I am when the first thing that popped into my mind after reading the title of the video was "your dad"
The current mankind has little clue on the space strands they are just finding! Filaments wiring the universe together glowing and now visible to us like never before! We have so much to learn! Other dimensions and dark matter! To learning more and more!
Blasphemy at the highest level and it is getting every day worst and worst I mean you wanna define nothing man and tell us nothing created every thing that we see 🙄
the cost of all this must be uncosted cost which is independent from all of this and all powerful in order to cost this magnificent complex sophisticated universe and that is what we as theist or believers of Creator believe that is Almighty God who costed and created and he Almighty is independent from his creation and we can't comprehend him nor his mighty simple as that
None of them really try to answer where did energy / matter come from. All are based on fact that energy / matter created big bang. Only thing that differs is what big bang was.
I'm more interested about "how would energy appear from nothing" not "how unimaginably huge amount of energy created the big bang"
Nothing is not nothing though. That is your problem. Nothing is something in physics.
Quantum fluctuations show something can come out of nothing, so my bet is that energy is coming from inaccessible higher dimensions permeating through ours, but that of course just begs the question where did the energy for the higher dimensions come from?
@@1madmaxx80 all “somethings” have an origin though. What created that “nothing?” That’s the point where my brain begins to disintegrate thinking about that.
@@1madmaxx80 so nothing is something in physics as you say, so what is it ?
I have a simple answer personally
“In the beginning God created”
And before you so quickly cast it out, think for just a moment and consider, is it any crazier than multiple demotions that exist out of our reality? Or energy literally coming from nothing?
God did it
The big bounce then the Big Bang and finally the big expansion the porno trilogy
Well I think once the James Webb Telescope is up and running we will get some more answers. But I think we are still 100's of years away from figuring out how the universe started. Hope I am wrong as would love to know.
Maybe couple of thousand years more?
JWT is just like a photographer lost in a forest , it will click many pictures around of which some could be new to sight .
But in the end the question remains , what created the forest .
By clicking a picture of new plant species in a forest cannot determine what created the forest.
Ps. We are talking about the Origin not the Results.
The problem with this line of questioning is that without evidence, it stops being science.
Let's not pretend that science isn't 99% theoretical.
Before the Big Bang, there was Cher! 💃🏽
What is "nothing"?
Wait till you get inside of my brain.
It's simple. You, the witness of everything is nothing. Know thyself !
The arrogance of the scientific community to disregard any question pertaining time before big Bang has been very infuriating.
The ultimate answer Is From Al Quran, the book of God
Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” Quran (Surah Al-Anbiya, verse 30)
I'm not confused anymore i just LOL at what was before big bang style play. I mean before Big Bang/s how could something form from nothing technically as something even if its vacuumed and cold and not moving whats causing the vacuumed cold as something holding next layer as nothing whats holding nothing something as so on nothing something and so on even if it blends in dimensions and weaves bounces of in another directions never ends its in crystal form? Maybe and it keeps layer dimensions layers and so on :)How could anything started from 0 which is something first as nothing and so on till our earth aaaaaahhhh lol :)
Now I know you are way more knowledgeable of things than I am but if you have a big bang which the entity we give the designation of universe that if you break down the word or designation NOTHING it doesn't mean that there was zero universe before this big bang it is the designation that we previously gave to the universe to distinguish it as an entity separate from it's members and parts that before this wasn't distinguishable through any designations available because by definition nothing is something it has characteristics attributes it's finite in one two and three dimensions and is self contained separate entity that occupies space but separate from space but shares spatial characteristics just would like to know how far off I am when in my observation in the light of experience through physical interaction with my environment has lead me to this conclusion. The universe existed before this big bang we just didn't call it the universe because prior to the big bang our consciousness couldn't comprehend, categorize and designate a concept so large we called it nothing thank you for your time my name is Christopher Evan Sanders
I w3as once a hardcore atheist. I rode with The Four Horsemen. Then I read about quantum mechanics and watched nutjobs like these people who are unable to even agree on the playing field, let alone the rules of the game and realized that as ridiculous as an overarching creator sounds, the idea is as compelling and unprovable as any of the dreck presented here.
This is philosophy. Not science. I realize the two are first cousins, but it's still gross if they kiss.
Genensis 1:3
IN the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
That’s the beginning of your big bang! Gods word.
before I watch this to end, I began to think that the launch of JWST and the hype all around the world and mankind all are useless 10BN usd spacecraft. BBC present all the ultimate answers, simply theres *no need* to explore this universe.
And BBC has track records in always has the way to get it done, making something became nothing.
There is also one thing that humans possses which can give answers to all the question
And that thing is our
♾️IMAGINATION♾️
Big fan of the blackhole theory.
Im a fan of Brak
I know how everything exists, you can ask me and I will explain but you wouldn’t understand or comprehend.
Before this universe, there was another universe that got destroyed then break for billions of years then this Big Bang happened. Cycle of creating. AUM 🙏🏻🙏🏻
big black hole bang seems the most stupid theory, and im really sorry proff Lee smolin , may be im not wise enough to accept your theory of the birth of universe
I read this book that is 3,400 years old and it says that God created the heavens and the earth. So far science is affirming these claims. So strange..
If the universe is infinite, could the big bang be only a fraction of it? Like a grenade exploding on an already existing desert?
Dr. Singh „I don’t believe it was big bang“…. (Believe?)…..Is this science or speculation?
The whole theory is already written in “Quran”
On how the universe begins,
The Qur'an says that "the heavens and the earth were joined together as one unit, before We clove them asunder" (21:30). Following this big explosion, Allah "turned to the sky, and it had been (as) smoke. He said to it and to the earth: 'Come together, willingly or unwillingly.' They said: 'We come (together) in willing obedience'" (41:11). Thus the elements and what was to become the planets and stars began to cool, come together, and form into shape, following the natural laws that Allah established in the universe.
Expansion of Universe
"The heavens, We have built them with power. And verily, We are expanding it" (51:47).
since knowledge of the universe's expansion was only recently discovered.
lol😂
🤣
i am no where near the level of these people but i have guesstimated the black hole birthing a new universe theory :P
This is beyond human capicity... Only GOD is the solution you cannot prove. What was exploding???? How was that exploding thing came into existance????
Exactly
Fool 😂
The more I watch/ read about all this.. the more my believe in Allah increases. 🙏🏽
I think to understand how we came to be we should look where we are heading towards, it would be easier to model and would probably give us the answer we seek. But personally, I am not sure our species will survive before we found the answer...
Yeah, I hope that the form we have today as humans is not the last staage of the evolution.
I like Penrose's CCC, it doesn't rely upon a "bounce" after some mythical contraction that our current accelerating expansion doesn't predict. It too plays around with the concept of nothing, namely that without matter scale doesn't mean anything and a heat-dead universe becomes equivalent to a pre-BB one.
But penrose’s CCC doesn’t explain how the entropy is reset to starting conditions of a Big Bang.
More we know about the universe and space
More it feels like a simulation run by alien kid's Minecraft game from a very advance civilization with a good graphic card .
And that is correct then our whole universe will be wiped clean after that alien kid is done playing his game or when his mom stops him 😂😂😂
It's kinda sad 😂😂😂
As an American, this is easier to digest with a British accent narrator. Weird Science.
I thought if it's impossible to test, then it's not science?
The question "What Came Before The Big Bang?" is the same as asking what was running on computer before turning it on. Universe is simulation based on blockchain - that provides consistency. Our time is an illusion of us being in the movie played.
Kewl
Getting all Matrixy in here..
Let me know when they devise an experiment to confirm any of this.
EXACTLY!
"I DONT KNOW IF THE QUESTION EVEN MAKES SENSE"
that's what all humans should say
With everything, they have theorised since we became conscience.
What I wouldn’t give to know the truth on the creation or recreation, or maybe the starting point….if that’s even possible….
you could make a religion out of this!
.
.
.
.
actually I was thinking this kind of complex theories are why lazy minded or actually stupid people choose/accept to believe in religions
Actually- creation reveals The Living God. His awesome power etc, etc😉
This is just nonsense . If the universe is formed from collision of plsama membrane , or from another star of universe, then how was the first universe or star formed .Assumptions everbody can make . And naming words like big bang is just formed from collision of molecules . Lol 😂
Just waiting for the James web telescope to answer these theories 🙏
“What happened before the Big Bang?”
A L I E N S 👽
FOUR WORDS: God created the universe. The trouble is that too many people have too much trouble with that.
True. When you are educated, you do have a lot of trouble with absolute garbage spawned from pure bullshitting.
I always imagined and believed the black hole theory, but the bounce kind of clicks too. Look up variable oscillating stars. They're these stars that expand and contract like a heartbeat or a set of lungs.
Looking at the stars is truly humbling..
I feel the opposite. I think it’s amazing that humans have come so far that we can see millions of light years away and uncover our own origins. The fact that I’m from that species makes me feel big, capable, and inspired.
@@SpaceGlizzy Megalomaniac 😂.
Humans shouldn't be thinking of this. Our brain is not developed to process all these data about univers origin.
yeah we haven’t even reached a type one civilisation
Allah created this whole universe. Simple is that.
Allah doesn't exist
@@kehreazerith3016 look dude I won't argue with you...but believe me at the day of judgement you are gonna be In a real trouble.... I hope you understand things before it's too late.. Allah hu Akbar( Allah is the Greatest)
Except we only have ever observed this from our position
We are limited in our viewpoint. We can only observe the universe in three dimentions. For all we know the true nature of the universe maybe comprised of many more dimentions that we cannot comprehend.
Nothing can start from nothing
After all of these how can some people deny the existence of God?
God walked among them and did a thousand miracles a day and still they could kill him🤷
Unbelief is a wierd thing
my god isnt your god.
I can see the comments here are being made here are very immature. Those who don't want to discuss theoretical quantum physics can leave. I like to call the cyclic nature of the Universe 'The Tyranny of Design '.
Lol crymore
Sure, gatekeep videos
So you think your physics came out of nothingness???
@@ReynoldsJer where did your God come out ?
@@ReynoldsJer Physics didn't came out of nothingness cause Physics is an understanding of the physical world progenited by human mind ,if(certainly) you didn't know my good illiterate friend, the forces which dictate the physical world arrived from a infinitesimally reduced quarter of time and space and due to the cyclic nature of our universe and by 'The Tyranny of Design' even if we trace back that small point we will uncover by the 'Big Bounce Theory' and Big Bang theory of Blackholes' a return to presence of a past universe from which our universe was born. And hey idiot, the TH-cam you are using is too dictated by laws of electromagnetic conduction and radiation.
the universe are eternal, time and space does not exists....james webb telescope will prove
It will prove nothing, but just raise more questions about the existing facts
You never answer a question properly
Dinner and a movie?
I like to think Black holes have a limit. Once full the nothing on the other side becomes something. BANG. A new universe is born. Only there is no beginning or end. It's been going on forever and we simply don't have the ability to understand what forever really means.
It's God.
@@volishona Nope. God is part of it not the cause of it all. Evolution is how creation works or vice a versa. Forever means forever. God is just us trying to make sense of forever. There is no cause. No beginning or end. Only forever..... Make the most of it.
@@lknanml there is only one thing that cannot have a begening. An entity that exists since forever on its own. Why it has to be a God? Because nothing else can exist on its own.
@@volishona I have no problems supporting someone who says they believe in GOD.
I have second thoughts when I hear someone say GOD is absolute.
Open mind vs closed mind.....
A closed mind can be a very dangerous state of being when it comes to religion.
This cloth just came by itself, got tailored and I woke up wearing it!!!
😂😂
That's in your perspective, in quantum realm your tiny brain can't comprihent what's happening! So cloth do came by itself
The scientific community will bend over backwards to try and deny the existence of a Creator. Theory after theory after theory but continue to deny all the messengers...
Past (Big Bang Theory)
Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?
[Quran 21 : 30 ]
Present (Hubble's Law)
And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
[Quran 51 : 47 ]
Future
The Day when We will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written] sheet for the records. As We began the first creation, We will repeat it. [That is] a promise binding upon Us. Indeed, We will do it.
[Quran 21 : 104 ]
" And We have placed within the heaven great stars and have beautified it for the observers." Quran 15:16
"Are you a more difficult creation or is the heaven? Allah constructed it. He raised its ceiling and proportioned it. And He darkened its night and extracted its brightness." Quran 79 : 27 - 29
There’s no evidence for one
😑stop preaching here
I still think our universe expands forever untill another universe erupts into being. Our universe now is just expanding into the vast emptiness of a universe before ours.
Um no. Our universe it’s creating its own space
Please cite your source material.
@@ErinRaciell How do you create space/nothingness?
@@Etheral101 nothingness is nothingness.There's nothing there.Hard to think about isnt it.
@@justflex6745 and it is exciting upsetting and depressing at a sametime 😱😒😕
Let's hope James Webb takes us a bit closer to grand truths of our universe
I know this sounds crazy but in metaphorical terms I look at the universe like a tree, with stems of dark matter and branches of gravity, flowering with galaxies that are full of petals containing lots of pollen, the pollen being us 😀
Sounds like the Yggdrasil in Norse mythology.
Celestials came before big bang
So where did nothing come from?
The most brilliant minds on earth: " I have no f'ing idea." The possibilities are mind-blowing.
Before the Big Bang, was a small bang
God almighty says,
*Do not the disbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were a closed-upmass (ratqan), then We opened them out (fafataqnahuma)?*
*And We made from water every living thing will they not then believe?*
Quran (21:30)
What few people know however is that the Holy Quran described the Big Bang perfectly, 1400 years earlier.
Its a big sign that Quran is word of God.
Next we turn to the meaning of “and then We opened them up” for which the arabic is fafataqnahuma. This means that something is cloven asunder. Lane’s Lexicon describes the essential meanings as the cleaving asunder of something united to make it disunited.
The word is in the dual, applying it grammatically to the ‘heaven and the earth’ just described as a closed-up mass.
So far, so startling. This is a pretty perfect description of the Big Bang. The cosmos was indeed a closed-up mass, ie: a highly dense and tiny point which has opened up to produce the wider universe.
👉God Almighty speaks to the Mankind:
*This then is, Allah, your Lord; there is no deity but He is the Creator of everything : so worship Him alone, for He is the Guardian of all things, No sight can comprehend Him but He comprehends all sorts of sight, for He is All-Comprehensive and All-Aware.*
Quran 6 (102-103)
*“How can you disbelieve in Allah Seeing that you were dead and He gave you life. Then He will give you death, then again will bring you to life and then unto Him you will return.”*
Quran (2:28)
*And Allah has brought you out from the wombs of your mothers while you know nothing. And He gave you hearing👂, sight👁, and hearts❤ that you might give thanks (to Allah)."* Quran (16:78)
👉God Almighty says to the Mankind,
Say(O Prophet),
*“Allah gives you life, then causes you to die, then He will assemble you on the Day of Resurrection about which there is no doubt.”*
Quran (45:26)
*"In the name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful."*
This Message is from the slave and Messanger of Allah Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) to the Mankind.
Peace be upon him, who follows the right path. Furthermore
I invite you to Islam, and if you become a Muslim you will be safe, and Allah will double your reward, and if you reject this invitation of Islam you will be committing a sin.
(And I recite to you Allah's Statement:)
👉Allah almighty our creator says,
*Say, "O people of the Book! Come to what is common between us and you, that we worship none but Allah; that we associate nothing with Him and that none of us shall make as our Lord any other than Allah."*
*If they reject your invitation, then tell them plainly, "Bear witness that we are Muslims (who worship and surrender to Allah alone)."*
Qur'an (3:64)
👉Allah almighty says,
*Your real Deity is but One. He Who is Lord of the earth and the heavens and of all that is between them, and Lord of all Easts.*
Qur'an (37:5)
Once we die our creator will again resurrect us on the Judgment day.And on that day if you have believed in Allah and have followed his book Quran then you will be succeed in the hereafter life.
Hereafter life is the eternal life either in Paradise or hellfire depending upon the good amd bad deeds you did in this world.
👉God Almighty says to the Mankind,
Say(O Prophet),
*“Allah gives you life, then causes you to die, then He will assemble you on the Day of Resurrection about which there is no doubt.”*
Quran (45:26)
Our brains cannot comprehend what came before, nor are humans ready for it.
Forplay?
The answer is nobody knows
The question should be two ways 1.) Where we came from? 2.) Where will we go to after life?
The clip has got very very low audio level. I have to volume up 3 times higher than normal, which caused sound burst when an advertisement cut in. Couldn't finish this interesting program. It's too harsh to my speakers.
Still fails to answer the core question: where did it all come from. Fascinating video, though.
It Big bang theory is sold in holy book of Quran before 13 century
Click on it
th-cam.com/video/L72LaEmoZBQ/w-d-xo.html
The video is indirectly saying that the universe had no beginning and is eternal 🤦🏾♂️
@@bjo004 Exactly. I was kinda looking for more than that. Lol
Science is REAL religion
This is why people turn towards religion - they get all the answers of all the questions they have .... Moreover they get answers for the quotations they don't have.
I believe in science but some things will never be known and are only theoretical. Scientist always say it's a cop out but the missing piece for me is God. There are scientist that say they see God's hands in all science. I think even if they ever do find out what started everything will only open up more questions cause human brains are not built to comprehend things on such magnificent scales
There’s no god. It’s such a lazy answer. “I don’t understand it, god must have done it”. If everyone thought like you we’d be living in caves still.
@@Swampsong117 well I guess you only understood the most basic of things there. I didn't say God did everything did I. I also said it was my opinion. Plenty of scientist believe that as well. I said there are questions that we will never have an answer to and for me God has those but doesn't mean I would just stop trying to figure it out so go ahead and act like liberal and cut somebody down for not having your same thoughts. It's okay. Your brain probably doesn't have intelligence in it to grasp what I was saying anyway but have a nice day and enjoy your time on earth cause hell is gonna suck for you
@@majinvegeta9280 you think hell is real? And you’re questioning my intelligence? Thanks, that really made me laugh 😂
tldr: nobody really knows
There are fairly easy issues with these theories.
The rebounding universe. The problem with this theory is that time its self would need to flow backwards for universe to shrink back down, which goes against entropy. The second issue is the universe is actually older than 13.5 billion years. This is just as far as we can see. Its because light from galaxies farther away has yet had time to reach earth. The reason why the universe is older than 13.5 years is because that is how far the distant galaxy was as they were measured from earth, however the universe has been expanding while that light was traveling to earth. This means those distant galaxies are much farther than we measured. Thus the universe is much older than the CMB. Its like being on a beach and looking at the horizon and thinking that horizon is the end of the earth.
The membrane theory flaw is that we can’t prove there are higher dimensions. In our 4 dimensional spacetime we only can move freely in 3 of those dimensions, but we can only move forward in time. We can’t move freely to the past or future, yet we know what time is and it affects our daily lives. A 5th, 6th, or 7th dimension? We wouldn’t even know what to look for. We can’t prove that it does exist, but we can’t prove it doesn’t exist. To me it’s no different than thinking a god created the universe.
The issue with the black hole theory is it’s exactly the same as the chicken and egg. What came first the chicken or the egg. The black hole or the universe . What created the first universe? Most would figure, must be a black hole. But nothing can escape a black hole, not even light, and black holes evaporate over an absurdly long period of time via Hawking’s radiation. It’s more likely the universe doesn’t exist if we were a black hole. It would stay nothing. If the universe came first, what made the universe? The Big Bang?
What came before the big bang? Either god, an existence that came before us, or maybe our entire universe is just 1 tiny bubble among many. Or maybe the big bang never happened as we imagine it
The big bang is a flawed concept which will have to be removed from science books in a few years , same as the universe being a random occurance is no longer considered scientific hence the invention of the " multiverse"
The big bang needs an big bang particle since the the universe is " expanding " yes but its not from the big bang 😂
We also have to find dark matter first and we haven't !
The big bang is a flawed concept which will have to be removed from science books in a few years , same as the universe being a random occurance is no longer considered scientific hence the invention of the " multiverse"
The big bang needs an big bang particle since the the universe is " expanding " yes but its not from the big bang 😂
We also have to find dark matter first and we haven't !
Plus , scientists are starting to think it occured somewhere around earth😂😂
@@cedriceric9730 wow 😑
It seems Dr Param Singh's Idea of the Universe very much aligns with the cyclical religion of Hinduism .. a coincidence perhaps ?
the thing with ideas is that it's really good to bring up ideas in ways to make people think less of what they don't know. But let's just agree nobody will ever know what really happened.
I don't thing that universe can be created by big bang, this world is so so detailed that I can't believe that life soul and nature was created by an explosion 💥 👉 🌎
Nothing created every thing......
Nothing set all laws of physics begore big bang....
But boting is uncreated...existed always..
Replace Nothing with God
Is more logical...
I have 3 more suggestions. 1. Before the Big Bang was God. Science and Math have a hard time reconciling this because math, not yet at least, can define "God." 2. Before the big bang was nothing. 3. We will discover more evidence later in time that will adjust our definition and understanding of the big bang, and it'll change this entire narrative. I'm a science teacher who believes in science, evidence, and fact based information. I also believe in God but not in the same way any man made religion teach "God." I'm also open to the possibility that everything happened before the big bang, and all the big bang is really asymptotic to the observable universe. That's the limit for us, and others will have a relativistic point of view. Until we put all the data together from everywhere, we'll never answer this question without debate and skeptical questions.
“…Thomas [Aquinas] establishes that the first efficient cause of being must itself
be pure act.1 He contends that anything in motion (broadly conceived as anything that
changes whatsoever) must have previously been in passive potency to that motion and
thus moved to that motion by some source of actuality external to itself. As Thomas
states, “Nothing can be reduced from potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality.” Nothing can be made actual except by something already actual.
Furthermore, it is “impossible that in the same respect and in the same way a thing
should be both mover and moved, i.e., that it should move itself.” An external agent
already in act is required for the reduction of potency to act. Anything put in motion
(i.e., anything previously in passive potency) is put in motion by another and, as Thomas
notes, “that by another again.”2 But this chain of movers cannot go on infinitely, or
there would be no first mover-that is, no ultimately sufficient reason for movement.3
Since the first mover is necessarily unmoved by another, and since all movement comes
from some mover in act, that first mover must be pure act (actus purus).”
1 Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae Ia.2.3, in translation as Summa Theologica,
trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Allen, Tex.: Christian Classics, 1981).
2 Aquinas, Summa theologiae Ia.2.3
3 Aquinas’s argument is not that God is the first cause or mover in a mere
chronological sense but rather that He is the first inasmuch as He is the most
fundamental source and explanation of contingent being wherever and whenever it is
found. This understanding of Aquinas’s claim controverts the old accusation that his
Five Ways teach that God is the first link on the great chain of being with creatures and
thus stands univocally with them in the same order of being. See the discussion in Brian
Davies, Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Guide and Commentary (New York:
Oxford University Press, 2014), 34-50. See also Richard A. Muller, “The Dogmatic
Function of St. Thomas’ ‘Proofs’: A Protestant Appreciation,” Fides et Historia 24 (1992):
15-29.
Excerpt From
James E. Dolezal
www.goodreads.com/book/show/35783848
Chapter 2
Yow. Anyone ever wonder were the universe end.
Are you implying the stars or space itself? Space probably doesn't have an end
From our mothers womb
Religiously talking, we will know the answer when we die and meet the Creator.
Except we will not. There is noone in controll, we are alone, and world is chaotic place
@@DRAGUNOV1902 *yet
Shame the BBC does not do so much science content anymore. No the employees would rather take the corporation to court and moan about equal pay giving the BBC and its legal department the chance to waste license fee payers contributions on really silly internal bickering. Well done to the older BBC employees that got to buy out the rights to buy the original BBC production facilities and rights dirt cheap at the turn of the centaury. I never forget the only advert on the BBC about it being able to make its own content funded by the British public and as soon as that finished they sold it all off. Now you have Brit box and Getty Images that have magically got rights to that originally funded content and they can profit from that and not only that they sell it back to the British license fee payers. I actually phoned the BBC and asked when the British public were going to get a rebate on their license fee. I stated that why can Brit Box , Getty Images and other stream sites get to make money privately from Original BBC shows such as Doctor Who and other long running shows . I got laughed at and the guy on the BBC complaint line said well these shows are not produced by the BBC . I then said firstly we should get cash back just because of the likes of Rolf Harris and Jimmy Saville . The laughing immediately ceased . I then pointed out that until Dr Who was revived it was produced by the BBC and I mentioned other historic shows shown on Brit Box including the earlier seasons of Dr Who and to this the man on the phone couldnt answer. I am very very upset that the BBC now has very very little to offer . The people who now run it have stolen from the license paying public and they think thats absolutely their right. The BBC is now just a piggy bank for whoever gets to run it . I also dont get why they are buying content from Sony who now have a bigger percentage of the broadcast media on television in the UK and dont get ANY license fee money from that. I also dont get how the BBC blatantly use product placement in some shows and Spooks is one I complained about as all the phones and computers where Apple Products in one season and the logo at the office in the supposed MI5 headquarters was full of it. I was told again the show wasn't produced by the BBC and the show was just representing real life. But im sure at the time it was another direct competitor with Apple that had contacts for technology with British Government departments . BBC the only shows you screen now worth any viewing time are your science shows Horizon and Sky at Night being the best but even now I have seen a episode of Horizon on a channel in the USA that has just had the narration dubbed to suit that countries demographic and it wasn't called Horizon . Shame on the current chiefs at the BBC you are criminal . Shame that this TH-cam content funded in the original British way gets sold to the highest bidder to line your grubby, greedy pockets instead of being used to fund ORIGINAL British television , media , news and education like it used to. Im speaking on the behalf of the public.