Its so hard to do many breaks against a good player like Fritz. But its not hard with Sinner, he makes you feel that serving is not a plus in his game at all, may he will lose some but definitely he will breaks so many. We will continue keep saying ( Sinner is on another level )
Yeah not sure on this one, but Zverev playing Giron in the 2nd round seems a bit easier than Sinner vs Fritz/Dimi/Ruud in much higher stakes and levels of opponent.
Nothing random at all. It is an algorithm that is probably based on: - Number of winner shots / forced errors from the opponent vs. Unforced errors - Aces - 1st serves in (%) - Points won on 1st serves (%) - Points won on 2nd serves (%) - Points won at the opponents 1st and 2nd serve (%) - Points played at the net vs. % points won at the net - Break points created vs. Break points converted My guess is that, out of the 10 rating points in a scale of 0-10, the main aspect should be the number of winners, the 1st serve stats, and the points on return of serve
@@Isaac-RJ The algorithm is actually more sophisticated than this. These are all the older tennis stats, but these performance ratings are done by tennis insights and based on these plus speed, spin, depth, width, steal score, conversion score, and more
@@bw7601 speed is understandable but spin becomes irrelevant In an scenario where a player hits 25 winners and 15 of those are drop shots, groundstrokes wouldn't be better valued just because they have more RPM. Same with volleys
Sinner is in 3 of these and they’re 2 finals and the atp finals semi vs 2nd round performances from Nole and Sascha. Absolutely mental this guy
Sinner can do the top 5 alone
Its so hard to do many breaks against a good player like Fritz.
But its not hard with Sinner, he makes you feel that serving is not a plus in his game at all, may he will lose some but definitely he will breaks so many.
We will continue keep saying ( Sinner is on another level )
How are these measured? This seems a bit random
Yeah not sure on this one, but Zverev playing Giron in the 2nd round seems a bit easier than Sinner vs Fritz/Dimi/Ruud in much higher stakes and levels of opponent.
Nothing random at all. It is an algorithm that is probably based on:
- Number of winner shots / forced errors from the opponent vs. Unforced errors
- Aces
- 1st serves in (%)
- Points won on 1st serves (%)
- Points won on 2nd serves (%)
- Points won at the opponents 1st and 2nd serve (%)
- Points played at the net vs. % points won at the net
- Break points created vs. Break points converted
My guess is that, out of the 10 rating points in a scale of 0-10, the main aspect should be the number of winners, the 1st serve stats, and the points on return of serve
@@Isaac-RJ The algorithm is actually more sophisticated than this. These are all the older tennis stats, but these performance ratings are done by tennis insights and based on these plus speed, spin, depth, width, steal score, conversion score, and more
@@bw7601 speed is understandable but spin becomes irrelevant
In an scenario where a player hits 25 winners and 15 of those are drop shots, groundstrokes wouldn't be better valued just because they have more RPM. Same with volleys
@@Isaac-RJ the algorithm probably takes that into consideration as well
Zverev almost lost the second set and has a higher rating than sinner's semi finals match? Yeah right..