EHang Founder, Mr. HU Huazhi commuted via EHang AAV in Guangzhou | Urban Air Mobility | EHang

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 มี.ค. 2019
  • What is air taxi?
    Now we don't need to imagine , we can see it, we can experience it by EHang Autonomous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
    As crowds are pouring into the city, life speeds up, traffic gets denser, and urbanization is close to collapse. We can see more and more roads, tunnels, bridges, still don't solve the problem.
    The electrical, vertical takeoff and landing (eVTL), autopilot air taxi could be the best solution. People name it "air taxi", "drone taxi", "flying taxi", etc.
    That's why varies magnates start to invest in this industry, to be exact, it is Urban Air Mobility industry, which is an emerging aspect of air transportation for human and goods in the near future. A new Blue Paper from Morgan Stanley Research projected a total addressable market of $1.5 trillion for autonomous aircraft by 2040.
    EHang AAV (Autonomous Aerial Vehicle) made a big step for the whole Urban Air Mobility industry by carrying up to 17 people in Vienna, April 4th, 2019.
    At CES 2016, EHang officially launched the world’s very first electric AAV for low-airspace short-distance air transportation. With the core concepts of autopilot, full redundancy safety design and cluster management by intelligent command and control center, pilots are no longer necessary for a flight, while passengers only need to click the “take-off” button to fly to the selected destination. EHang will provide every passenger a truly enjoyable journey by the safe and intelligent autopilot system.
    In February, 2018, EHang has unveiled footage of the latest test flights of EHang AAV in Guangzhou, China. Since then, EHang AAV conducted an array of flight demonstrations in Amsterdam, Doha, Vienna.
    EHang is a world's leading autonomous aerial vehicle (AAV) technology platform company based in Guangzhou, China.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 95

  • @GabrielDeVault
    @GabrielDeVault 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Fantastic! While everyone else is talking, you are doing!

  • @inspiringthechange2950
    @inspiringthechange2950 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great effort by whole team . Seems people are criticizing but the fact is your team did it in an awesome way . You guys will be the pioneer for the UAV transportation revolution .

  • @seekersofrhythm
    @seekersofrhythm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was so impressed with the the journey you took from THE AAV hub Guangzhau an has demonstrated the reality of a new form of sustainable transport both for short range taxi service within areas where congestion is becoming increasingly problematic in major cities. This in my opinion is a real world solution that is using technology that is available in construction via 3d printing plus the creative adaptation of drone design and making a cost effective transportation system that has the type of "green credentials" that put it at the forefront of modern passenger transport. Congratulations J.

  • @camtehuti
    @camtehuti 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Awesome innovation keep up the fantastic work!

  • @armstrongchan1417
    @armstrongchan1417 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing!

  • @montecarlostudio5199
    @montecarlostudio5199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome!

  • @MauroTandoi
    @MauroTandoi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome

  • @paulo4371
    @paulo4371 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ehang just changed the game!!

    • @jamesli2353
      @jamesli2353 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think EHang'd just win the game!

  • @mhchoudhurymd
    @mhchoudhurymd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Expect great service and development from this disruptive technology. Air mobility fire water rescue seems very reasonable. Investors. Long. Thanks.

  • @mogacreative409
    @mogacreative409 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work!

  • @larrymondello8475
    @larrymondello8475 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @MDRASEL-cp8ym
    @MDRASEL-cp8ym 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @mojo7618
    @mojo7618 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would certainly wear a helmet in such flight test

  • @maskman4821
    @maskman4821 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    億航 184 已經準備好了, 可以量產了 !!!

  • @crezzlin
    @crezzlin 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good Jobb 👌🔥🔥🔥

  • @MDRASEL-cp8ym
    @MDRASEL-cp8ym 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice plz motor kitne paise ki milti hai flying Drone

  • @gonzalojavier3
    @gonzalojavier3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the speed max?

  • @moonwalkerxidau6405
    @moonwalkerxidau6405 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have you tested emergency if one rotor goes out ? Or if fly out of coded route or high level windy....how landing...

    • @dmitriyp7701
      @dmitriyp7701 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You even don't feel if one motor is broken

  • @cyrusjameskhan
    @cyrusjameskhan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    @1:30 Blade Runner IRL

  • @khalidbinswidan138
    @khalidbinswidan138 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we want to buy one what is price

  • @olireg5696
    @olireg5696 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    would like to see a 15 min trip and they recharge battery

  • @DrWenChannel
    @DrWenChannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing this video. How do you respond to the recent Japanese flying car "SkyDrive?" Is the technology different between EHang 184 and SkyDrive flying car? Also if there is a "bird strike" while flying, is there any "backup plan" (e.g. Airframe Parachute System - CAPS, in Cirrus SR22 etc.) to save the driver/passenger? Thanks!

  • @piehamcake1
    @piehamcake1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to buy one?

  • @sonuansari409
    @sonuansari409 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeh kaha par milega hamko kharidana hai

  • @tnyachot
    @tnyachot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is different it has 8 arms for the 16 blades than the video I saw of the 4 arms with 8 blades. This drone looks bigger than another video where the guy could barely get in and out of it.

    • @tnyachot
      @tnyachot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Y O J I M B O 用心棒 I was going over some more videos they are upgrading. I really like to try it out.

    • @cem_cem9991
      @cem_cem9991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Y O J I M B O it says 116 on the side

    • @jamesli2353
      @jamesli2353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There're two models :
      EHang 184(4 arms, one person) & EHang 216(8 arms, two persons)!
      EHang 216 also has a double size baggage cabin at its back.

  • @sixwater1
    @sixwater1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ㅠㅠ 이항아~~~ ㅠㅠ

  • @RajSachdeva
    @RajSachdeva 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How long would have taken him if he commuted the old way?

    • @cem_cem9991
      @cem_cem9991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Escape From Zombie Island lmao 😂

  • @MiguelTiempos
    @MiguelTiempos 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good Progress, need to get safety features in, landing gear with cushioning spring, and Electronics to go, need to engage in AI or Deep Learning to avoid power lines, and to map the trajectory , also optical tips to land on a designated landing pad , like a QR code...

  • @kevin20809
    @kevin20809 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Partner up with DJI guys!!! :D

  • @rogerterry5013
    @rogerterry5013 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Change the name to City Hopper. Great, but the problem is wind speed.

  • @georgeasufra5009
    @georgeasufra5009 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ehang this will sell to wealthy and even middle class if you can provide survival crash protection this is the missing piece of this amazing AAV technology you already know what happen to Kobe Bryant. Please take a look also on the bladeless design and Lilium drones so that your potential buyer will not be afraid of propellers... I'm a Filipino and I truly admire Chinese Technology

  • @xjaimx9651
    @xjaimx9651 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Number 1

  • @godschild199
    @godschild199 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first who use the drone to fly is Doraemon.
    A drone hat..

  • @princessmiriam6911
    @princessmiriam6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My friend you must more modifications on rotor propeller follow my instructions and need more energy power supplying

  • @xjaimx9651
    @xjaimx9651 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi

  • @princessmiriam6911
    @princessmiriam6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My friend you must more modifications on rotor propeller follow my instructions so you aviation get more air balancing
    because the weather change was unexpected and need more energy power supplying

  • @mecdrones
    @mecdrones 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quero um!!!

  • @hra4909
    @hra4909 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've seen too many drones fall out of the sky or crash into trees to ever get into one.

  • @ChrisVideoNet
    @ChrisVideoNet 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can i invest?

  • @israelortega951
    @israelortega951 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    UN VIENTO CRUZADO Y TE VAS DE PICADA!

  • @tjeuh4903
    @tjeuh4903 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    funny when i read this comment after a year and the stock is up to 250

  • @dukeisang
    @dukeisang 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Landing legs needs shock absorbers... Landing legs can throw drone off balance while landing

  • @patckw
    @patckw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's gonna happen if there is an emergency and you want to get out?

    • @FirstNinoSAN
      @FirstNinoSAN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      you try to land! :D what would you do in a helicopter or airplane in an emergency? jump out?

  • @sadoputeh130
    @sadoputeh130 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The saw should be protected by cage

  • @haruspex1-50
    @haruspex1-50 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you can make it for 2 then you can make it for 4. If you can make it for 4 you can make it for 8. And if you can make it for 8 you can make it for......

  • @matthewball9055
    @matthewball9055 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    And here I am painting parking lots and digging holes with a shovel for Comcast... If you guys need anybody to wash the bugs off those things. Text me cuz I'm going to quit today after watching this ;)

  • @andrewjclark-thelogisticsl2547
    @andrewjclark-thelogisticsl2547 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, it's great and it flies, but those blades are at waist and leg height and they're going to kill someone. Why didn't they put the blades up high above head height? There is no way this could pass a basic user safety test.

  • @shawnbutts2403
    @shawnbutts2403 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not getting in one of these without a parachute, sorry. A fresh concept, but unless you have at least 4 parachutes for redundancy's (even one like you get in a fighter jet) in case of an emergency, it is just not safe.

    • @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
      @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One parachute should be enough. Extracted by rocket and instantly inflated by a an explosive charge in the same manner as an ejection seat parachute.

    • @shawnbutts2403
      @shawnbutts2403 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      William Jones-Halibut but then you lose the drone, hence why you need one first for the drone, then the other as a backup. The government can afford to lose a jet, consumers can’t.

    • @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
      @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shawnbutts2403Suggest you watch this video which is about CAPS the parachute recovery system on Sirus aircraft. The focus should be entirely on saving life. If you can get a second parachute in there fine but I think the complexity may even reduce safety Id rather have the weight used for extra redundancy or battery power to prevent the need for deploying a parachute in the first place. Unless you are lucky enough to land in an open field you should assume a right of. At minium the undercarriage should collapse to absorb the impact and then require replacement. Volocopter already have a parachute system that is working.

    • @shawnbutts2403
      @shawnbutts2403 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      William Jones-Halibut good points; I think that adding foam below so it floats in water after impact would be also inline too. Thanks for the tip; will give it a gander.

    • @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
      @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shawnbutts2403Forgot the link
      th-cam.com/video/zT58pzY41wA/w-d-xo.html

  • @LeonardoVarini
    @LeonardoVarini 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    3 words: Chinese are amazing!

    • @EzraMerr
      @EzraMerr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of the designs came from german workers and engineers, the chinese recieved money from being members of the CCP and owning factories , whilst profiting from cheap labour and getting handouts aid in the form of financial aid from America and the west.

    • @agoodfriedegg7102
      @agoodfriedegg7102 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EzraMerr Dont BS here, show us your link on your claim!

    • @EzraMerr
      @EzraMerr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@agoodfriedegg7102 你真的好傻🙄

    • @agoodfriedegg7102
      @agoodfriedegg7102 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EzraMerr You see, bullshitter has nothing to offer except bullshit! 🙄

    • @PenskePC17
      @PenskePC17 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cut the crap, lets be real relatively basic knowledge man. Every nation’s corporations copy to stay current but the Chinese have basically made it an art form by buying whole companies and just straight up stealing technology. They have come up with very little on their own.

  • @Romac622
    @Romac622 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    wouldn't that just be called a helicopter?

    • @Jorge-sy4bp
      @Jorge-sy4bp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      a helicopter costs at least 1M, this drone costs 300K

    • @yackawaytube
      @yackawaytube 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jorge-sy4bp A helicopter is faster and has much longer range and higher capacity also.

  • @mebeingU2
    @mebeingU2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks very cool, but with so little height and the small blades, if there is a system failure, you’re too low for a parachute to save you and the rotors are too small for you to autorotate down to safety.

  • @ryannathan3105
    @ryannathan3105 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Range is too short... still a highschool project....

  • @bertodiy
    @bertodiy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    it never go into production

  • @osvaldo1777
    @osvaldo1777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    deixá o ar prezo deixá sair o ar em um espaço pequeno o ar vai sair com mais força vai criar mais impulso na elice CRIAR um turbo deixa o ar sair no es Paço pequeno o ar vai sair com mais força mais impulso 👍

  • @adivrr
    @adivrr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    these rotors dont move forward cant fly fast.. airbus

    • @__-go9cj
      @__-go9cj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      not built for speed.

  • @ilhamsuhendi90
    @ilhamsuhendi90 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I dont see the innovation. We already had more efficient, reliable, and safe helicopter.

    • @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
      @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Much quieter,much cheaper, smaller landing footprint. Can be operated from many more locations. Suitable for automatic control. Very simple maintenance.

    • @jlcdrivewayramps7343
      @jlcdrivewayramps7343 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So reliable and safe which is why Kobe is still alive.

    • @AP-qu8sl
      @AP-qu8sl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This can fly unmanned

  • @kimronbyan6788
    @kimronbyan6788 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wasn't going to invest in the stock. i am not a smart guy but what if they attached guns on these drones, improve the speed and put a solar power battery charger in them. The cold war is alive

  • @konixtwenty8275
    @konixtwenty8275 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The total area of the propellers begins to equal a regular helicopter rotor. Therefore the design only makes sense if you shroud the propellers. That’s besides the fact that the way the open props are situated it’s a disaster in waiting. One wrong move and we’re talking severed legs, arms and heads. Oh and also besides the fact that the way Chinese make things this contraption is about as reliable as a Chinese made toaster. Life is not that valuable in Asia and in particular in China. That’s why they don’t pay a lot of attention to safety and quality of products. If somebody dies in a 1.2 billion populated China that’s just one person less to take up the air and space. So they don’t care. Therefore flying in this thing is like playing Russian roulette...

  • @chrisl442
    @chrisl442 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This oversized hobby grade drone is the most silly thing I ever saw. Only in China would the authorities allow human flight. It is a know fact that the motors used on this thing are hobby grade (for toys) and not aerospace products. Also, the design is flawed from the start. Anyone standing close during takeoff or landing will be chopped to pieces. A piece of crap.

  • @princessmiriam6911
    @princessmiriam6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My friend you must more modifications on rotor propeller follow my instructions so you aviation get more air balancing
    because the weather change was unexpected and need more energy power supplying