How the Cub Scout committee uses research, surveys and data to make program decisions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @ethan2077
    @ethan2077 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awards are being changed because they’re “not in direct line of sight of den leaders?” Sounds like the den leader needs more training/curriculum should be updated. There’s something super satisfying for a youth to wear a patch with pride, rather than another belt loop. The patch so different, it shows a unique moment of pride for a young scout, not just another piece to add to the collection.

  • @jeremycastleberry
    @jeremycastleberry ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1. beltloops cost more to produce than small patches. Scouting already costs too much. 2. Belt doesn't hold them all. 3. Nobody wants to look at a childs waistline to see awards.... 4. there is NO WAY only 1.5% is accurate. Whittling chit alone would be more than that. Shooting sports, outdoor award, cyber chip, etc are all EASY. Something is wrong with your "hard data"

    • @evapartments6938
      @evapartments6938 ปีที่แล้ว

      1. both are around $2 each. 2. Scouts can wear what the scout wants, or none at all. 3. ???. 4. bottom line is most (95-98%) scouts don't earn these as they aren't top of mind. They are still available and now EASIER to earn. And no sewing needed! 23k responses to a scientific survey taken over multiple years vs your opinion. I hope you keep an open mind and see how it rolls out.

    • @jeremycastleberry
      @jeremycastleberry 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I buy patches all the time. RARELY over a dollar if you are willing to buy 100+. BSA would be buying 100K volumes. @@evapartments6938

    • @jeremycastleberry
      @jeremycastleberry 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and as for earning them, we did a council survey and 100% earned at least ONE of the patches they claim only 1.5% earn. I can't imagine that we are unique. That 1.5% is complete BS and easily debunked simply by the SALES Numbers of the patches according to staff at my nearest National Store.
      @@evapartments6938