The Most Dangerous Electrical Tool

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @johnmusgrave3179
    @johnmusgrave3179 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1624

    I have been using these for 50 years without any issue. The are 2 rules : 1. If the screwdriver lights up the contact point is live so take proper precautions. 2. If the screwdriver does not light up, do NOT assume the contact is dead.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Thanks for watching!

    • @timhartherz5652
      @timhartherz5652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

      Rule 3: Don't bet your life on a cheap 0,25W Resistor if you can help it.
      The old ones had far beefier ones and were made better but still.
      Now there are options which are just as simple to use without making yourself part of the circuit.

    • @xsc1000
      @xsc1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      @@timhartherz5652 Older ones were made with resistors from tube era. Those were often rated for 1kV.

    • @niv8880
      @niv8880 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      As a younger man I've tolerated many 220v electrical shocks (up to 20KV when working with CRTs) Accidents happen. As an older man with a a heart condition, I treat every wire as if it was live (unless I'm actually in unobstructed sight of both ends). The latter has, again been a life-saver. Never touch the wires, keep one hand away and stand on rubber mats.

    • @antlane365
      @antlane365 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      They will also light up from capacitance if a cable is not earthed. They have saved me from many shocks over the years.

  • @robert.wigley
    @robert.wigley 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1707

    You hear people saying they're dangerous and/or unreliable all the time, but are there actually any reports of anyone ever heing harmed by one of these? I've been using them all my life and have no intention of stopping. They are incredibly useful and I would trust one of these over a contactless volt tester any day.

    • @Gaelmalkavian
      @Gaelmalkavian 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +310

      It is exactly what I was thinking. I am a professional electrician and it has never failed me nor have I had any problems.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +310

      Ive heard stories of people getting shocks, but it would be very hard to get data as it’s generally rare a shock like this would require a hospital visit.
      I personally think anything using you as part of the circuit is a terrible design, but everyone is entitled to an opinion. Thanks for watching!

    • @martijnveen5694
      @martijnveen5694 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      Its more the problem of cheap parts, the 1/4watt resistors and is not rated for these voltages, it can fail open or short-circuit for instance. Poking a 400volt connection is probably also not a good idea. Etc there are tomanny possible failure modes. If you know what you're doing it's most likely fine but for the home gamer it's not something to rely on. I'd say because when using it you are part of the circuit now thankfully almost every installation here is rcd protected. As a funny side not my last step before grabbing a conductor is using the back of my hand as a last live check😅

    • @maxtorque2277
      @maxtorque2277 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      @@TheDiligentDIYer1759 er, you are always part of a circuit because you absolutely always have a path to ground! Everything is a conductor, it's only the absolute level of impedance that varries.... lol ;-)

    • @russellham2094
      @russellham2094 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      And you want to short yourself to 230 volts with no control. Good luck
      I saw a fellow Apprentice receive a horrendous electrical shock using something identical to this
      Don't

  • @coniow
    @coniow 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +190

    Back in the Eighties when I was training as a Theatre Technician, one of our lecturers had got a shock through a 400 volt neon tester. It SAVED HIS LIFE. While handling a lantern that was running on one phase, it shorted onto the motorised truck that it was mounted on. The truck was on another phase. The tester melted, and every hair on his body burnt off, but he lived. Because of that tester.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Glad to hear it lived, thanks for watching!

    • @nootypenguino
      @nootypenguino 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@@TheDiligentDIYer1759 It?

    • @MutheiM_Marz
      @MutheiM_Marz 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      It said max 260 or 300 volt…
      A good electrician know their tools…

  • @clivebrooks8207
    @clivebrooks8207 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +424

    One of these may have saved my life. My son had a non working 13A socket in his house. I checked it with a multimeter and it showed as dead. I used one of these screwdrivers and it illuminated showing it was live. On further investigation I found the earth and neutral were both disconnected somewhere leaving only the line connected.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Non contact volt pen is best in my opinion, thanks for watching!

    • @kenzo4Ever
      @kenzo4Ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Below some voltage the light won't glow. You touch the wire and you get shocked ! 😀.
      At an isolated transformer it won't glow at any voltage ! You touch both wire and you get shocked ! 😀

    • @johnwade1095
      @johnwade1095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Never trust an old installation.

    • @mammutMK2
      @mammutMK2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I use a wire finder, as it detects electricity as well and reacts to small voltage and you don't need a closed circuit. In combination with a multi meter you then can find issues with a wire.

    • @Trbrigade
      @Trbrigade 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      non-contact indicators often give false positives. they just glow, especially if there are a lot of wires and they are close, and you cannot know which wire is hot and which is disconnected. Non-contact indicators use a battery, and it often runs out, and even in certified indicators the sensitivity drops; this has happened to me often. Sorry, but the indicator screwdriver is a reliable, life-tested device.
      and the most reliable thing is a dial multimeter.

  • @murbella7
    @murbella7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

    I have been using my device for more than 50 years. It has never failed, never broken anywhere, never had any foreign matter intrude into it and has always worked. Yes it can be hard to see the neon at times but it has always shown me when a wire or contact is live to mains voltage. Your fears may be sound scientifically but the chance of it happening is extremely slim. Using the bared-ended metal spikes of multimeter probes is far more awkward and way more dangerous.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks for sharing your opinion

    • @kenzo4Ever
      @kenzo4Ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Below some voltage the light won't glow. You touch the wire and you get shocked ! 😀.
      At an isslated transformer it won't glow at any voltage ! You touch both wire and you get shocked ! 😀

    • @NocKme
      @NocKme หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@kenzo4Ever well if you are dealing with a voltage that won't light it up then the shock won't do much either. It's not like 220v will kill you unless you decide to hold on to the wire or you are sitting on the roof without harness

    • @EmeraldOtringal
      @EmeraldOtringal 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      ​@@NocKme Not true at all, it can have lower voltage so that the light seems off, but a current of a lot of Amps, which is incredibly dangerous. Volts alone don't kill you, it's the resulting Amps that do the damage and that is related to the source's available Amps and the overall impedance of whatever it is it's traversing.

  • @ianseddon9347
    @ianseddon9347 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    Well my grandpa used one when I was a kid 70 years ago and I still use one! Seems like the usual electrician stuff - too difficult and dangerous for an intelligent ‘common man’! Well care and intelligence has worked for me for 60 years so I’m sticking with that.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching

    • @johnpipping3848
      @johnpipping3848 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Nobody does a proper apprenticeship nowadays. Students learn stuff in tech. college but don’t learn common sense and survival in the real world. That’s why they all have to do specific ‘elf and safety courses and suchlike.

  • @chrisgemmix0815
    @chrisgemmix0815 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    I think these things are quite safe unless visibly damaged (i.e. insulation compromised) or if the bulb broke somehow. Which is why when I want to make sure a circuit is *not* live I am using this device on a live circuit just beforehand to verify that it is working properly.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

    • @kenzo4Ever
      @kenzo4Ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Below some voltage the light won't glow. You touch the wire and you get shocked ! 😀.
      At an isolated transformer it won't glow at any voltage ! You touch both wire and you get shocked ! 😀

    • @galagaxi
      @galagaxi หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do the same. Had no problem for so many years.

  • @teunvl95
    @teunvl95 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Using a multi meter might lead you to believe that a circuit isn't live when only the neutral wire is isolated while the live wire is still live. The good thing about a mains tester is that you use yourself to replace the neutral wire and avoid depending on it.
    At least, that's what I can come up with, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not an electrician.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

    • @Marcel_Germann
      @Marcel_Germann หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That is why you don't use multimeters in electrical installations! And electricians use proper 2-pole voltage testers. They can identify that problem, and indicate it. And 2-pole voltage testers must indicate the presence of dangerous potential even without a battery. In them the battery is only for the additional functions, but not for the basic functionality of indicating a dangerous voltage. And they have a low risk of operating error, compared to a multimeter. Also you don't need to look away from the point of measurement to check a value on a display.
      Multimeters have also a high internal impedance, so they will indicate "ghost" voltages between 60 and 100V. Usually created by capacitive coupling by a parall running still energized cable. But with the slightest load these voltages will collapse to zero. These neon indicator screwdriver voltage testers have the same issue btw. And if you are isolated, for example standing on a rubber mat, that voltage tester won't work.

    • @TheFenrirulfr
      @TheFenrirulfr หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thats why us Electricians measure phase/phase, and both(or three) phase to earth.
      In norway we have 230V between the phases, and ~130V between phase and earth. If theres an outlet connected to a one-phase switch, and ONE phase is cut off, the 2nd phase could still be energised and if you touch it - and a i.e grounding wire you can get shocked

    • @Marcel_Germann
      @Marcel_Germann หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheFenrirulfr Scandinavian countries usually have IT grids instead of TN or TT. So actually two lines instead of a line and an earthed neutral conductor. 230V between the lines. That system has the advantage that it can tolerate two faults before it isolates a circuit. But the disadvantage is: Harder to find faults. And the bigger the grid is, the harder it is to find faults.
      To get an electric shock you need to touch both lines at the same time. When touching one line you won't get an electric shock. But if your neighbour has a faulty water kettle, that one would be fault number 1, and you touch the line you can get shocked. Because due to the fault one of the lines become the earthed neutral (the one with the fault in it).
      IT grids are not referenced to earth potential, that is the reason the measurements against earth potential are nonsense and indicating bogus numbers.
      In most other countries IT grids are only used in small areas, for example in hospitals. There it helps to ensure safeguarding against failure.

    • @FBAV
      @FBAV หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup

  • @dilvastak7351
    @dilvastak7351 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    You are mistaken in the principle of operation of the indicator screwdriver - the current does not go through the user to the ground, the user is a capacitor creating an oscillatory circuit. It is trivial to check - put on thick rubber shoes and the screwdriver will still work.

    • @CSMoviePhoto
      @CSMoviePhoto 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I had to read all the fictional assumptions made by so-called electricians/electronics, including the creator of the clip who didn't understand how this tester works. I'm glad that finally someone who knows has shed light on the subject! There are enough speculations that have nothing to do with electronics and how they work, nowadays, everyone thinks they are electronics engineers, but they don't understand how semiconductors work at the base. A resistance of 1M OHM indicates 0.23 mA compared to 20mA dangerous current at 230V voltage. But the gas in the lamp ignite, is not a usual lamp. Neon lamps are commonly used as low-voltage surge protectors.

  • @enoz.j3506
    @enoz.j3506 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    Had these types of screwdriver for decades,never had or heard of anyone getting hurt !!!!!! I will continue to use myn. Also most deaths are when the mains goes across the chest, hence why your told to keep one hand by your side when testing. The ironic thing is ,that using possible damaged probes, one in each hand for measuring, is far more dangerous,as it put the mains across the chest. . Scare hype for nothing pal.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thanks for sharing your opinion

    • @kenzo4Ever
      @kenzo4Ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Below some voltage the light won't glow. You touch the wire and you get shocked ! 😀.
      At an isolated transformer it won't glow at any voltage ! You touch both wire and you get shocked ! 😀

    • @enoz.j3506
      @enoz.j3506 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@kenzo4Ever When was the last time you worked on a job ,with an isolating transformer? & who puts 2 fingers across anything,Seriously.A Neon lamp,has a strike voltageof around 90v !!! As an electronics engineer,you learn very quickly to check and double check every circuit,before touching it, its called having a brain,these days everything is given,but you cant teach common sense.

    • @kenzo4Ever
      @kenzo4Ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@enoz.j3506
      OK.
      The difference is that I care to warn whereas You dare to insult ! 😀

    • @enoz.j3506
      @enoz.j3506 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@kenzo4Ever Warning fools, was never my strong point.

  • @moby1388
    @moby1388 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +147

    This tester is no more dangerous than any other tester. You are talking hypothetically, that can be said whatever you use.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Thanks for sharing your opinion

    • @rhettlyerly545
      @rhettlyerly545 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are you serious? What’s the CAT rating on those pen testers? 😂. Seriously, this is a big deal. You may get away with it for basic home use.

    • @stevoc9930
      @stevoc9930 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      These screwdrivers cannot prove a circuit is dead. As you have no way of knowing if it's actually working unless you can test it on a known source first.

  • @keithterry2169
    @keithterry2169 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I was trained to use a Drummond test lamp first and foremost. I also used a neon test lamp extensively, never got so much as the slightest tingle while using it - ever ! The likelihood of a foreign metal object falling into the body of a neon tester or the ingress of water into same is very remote.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching

    • @petextanky8421
      @petextanky8421 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A Drummond test lamp won’t light up if you have low volts like 180v and still plenty to give a shock if you assume dead !

    • @rogerphelps9939
      @rogerphelps9939 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Things like that would be blindingly obvious.

    • @keithterry2169
      @keithterry2169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why we were trained NEVER to assume dead until a further test showing live was taken.BTW, I have just checked the Drummond test lamp I was issued with and it is rated 80v to 500v, so definitely a bright light at 180v @@petextanky8421

    • @keithterry2169
      @keithterry2169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It will light up at 80v and "glow" at lesser voltages. The instructions on Drummond test lamps clearly state that the lamp should be "proven" on known circuits before and after tests.@@petextanky8421

  • @viandengalacticspaceyards5135
    @viandengalacticspaceyards5135 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Retired now, but have been using them all my life, never had or heard of a problem.
    But they tell you the most important thing 'Will I get zapped if I touch?' and small enough to always have clipped in your shirt.
    Even if you would get zapped, your hand would move back automatically, and it would be very short.
    (...and any electrician who's never been zapped shortly is a liar)

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching!

    • @duudsuufd
      @duudsuufd 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      It is the same as a cook that never burnt his fingers recently.

  • @lobhar
    @lobhar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I have worked on electrical equipment from low voltage to 400kV both AC and DC for 60 years using every type of test equipment. This is the only item I carry at all times. Use it sensibly and it will save your life.

  • @milanakik1539
    @milanakik1539 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This video was sponsored by Non-Contact Voltage Detector producers

  • @vlatoma8310
    @vlatoma8310 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    As a Master Electrician i disagree as the most dangerous electrical tool .Used it for many years. But what is dangerous is NOT knowing what you are doing.

  • @navalhabr
    @navalhabr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The Non-contact voltage tester is WAY more dangerous.
    This thing some times will not trigger for some random reasons or will give you false positives.
    You should always double check with another tool (like the Neon screwdriver).

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing your opinion

    • @bigoldgrizzly
      @bigoldgrizzly 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      they give a 'beep' when a live circuit is detected ....and also give you an adrenaline boost, when you are working on wiring and they give the same damn 'beep' as they automatically shut down after a minute or so of being idle

    • @NigelTolley
      @NigelTolley 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is the way - two tests to confirm.
      I carry both a volt stick and an incredibly frequently used screwdriver that is also a neon sometimes.

    • @mahadevparmekar2565
      @mahadevparmekar2565 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Also if you have a bunch of wires in a bundle, the contactless tester will not be to tell which one of them is alive.
      The mains tester is the best device for such situations.

  • @annaplojharova1400
    @annaplojharova1400 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    When made properly, these testers could be dangerous if not used for what they are intended for. The thing is, people (apparently including the author of the video) think these are intended to check whether the wires are energized or safe to work on. And that is absolutely wrong and dangerous assumption, many people got zapped when they thought the wires were off just because this did not appeared to light up.
    What this is really intended for is to verify which wire is the phase conductor or to positively check whether there is some power when something refuses to operate and that is all. Definitely not to verify the conductors are safe to touch or anything like that.
    In other words it only shows two states: "There is potential" when it lights up, and "I don't know" when it does not. None of those means "Safe to touch"...

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don’t think they should be used at all. I make that clear in the video.

    • @annaplojharova1400
      @annaplojharova1400 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TheDiligentDIYer1759 From the video I got an impression you are talking about "verify whether the wires are safe to work on" use, there I completely agree, the glow tester is not to be used.
      But when the task is "troubleshoot why the light does not work / where the wire is broken", it becomes the task these glowbottle testers are intended for.
      These "noncontact testers" are way too sensitive to identify the phase is really connected. They react even when there is broken phase wire or so - so when the place is crowded with wires, it is reacting all the time. They are supposed to be that way, because their purpose is to identify whether it is safe to work or not (as a double check after you switched the breaker off, of course).
      I know a V-meter is more reliable, but this is way faster. Plus sometimes you do not have access to a Neutral (like in light switches, if you want to identify whether the power even reaches them), so you even can not use the V-meter, while the non contact tester will respond to both wires even when the switch is disconnected or the wire broken, just due to coupling between those wires.

    • @fernando47180
      @fernando47180 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@annaplojharova1400 Thank you for sharing this piece of information that was omitted in the video. That puts everything into a far more interesting perspective.

  • @bendenisereedy7865
    @bendenisereedy7865 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Not only is it a quick, convenient and safe way of checking for a live connection but the bits (on both sizes of screwdriver) are the perfect shape for electrical work and the thin shank means you can spin the driver fast.

  • @brandonhutchison9864
    @brandonhutchison9864 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Been using one for years. One of the most useful electrical tools I have. Because you have to *touch* thescrewdriver on the conductor, it tells you exactly which one is alive. The proximity devices are ambiguous in this regard. Don't however use them to confirm something is *not* alive unless you have a nearby live sample to compare it with. The shock risk is minimal. One screwdriver I have lights faintly without actually touching it so even safer.

  • @kimbo99
    @kimbo99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    There is another danger. In the form of a virtual look-a-like 12V version used as car test lamp with a lead that comes out of the top of the screw driver to clip to ground in the car.. The two tools often co-exist in cheap tool kits. Looking so similar its possible to absentmindedly put the 12V test lamp into a 240V wall socket. A potentially very dangerous mistake.

    • @rogerphelps9939
      @rogerphelps9939 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to be joking, don't you?

    • @kimbo99
      @kimbo99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@rogerphelps99396 people disagree with you and my comment was aimed at novice DIYers who can be overconfident. You haven't seen the cheap Chinese Handyman screwdriver kits that mix 12volts test screwdriver with 240v neon test screwdriver. We see them in Sydney, and life and death I don't joke about.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching!

    • @skellbert
      @skellbert 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      been there done that, luckily I felt the tingle and let it go, haven't used these type since

  • @JuiceBanger1
    @JuiceBanger1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    i threw that blue lap pen out last month as it failed after 2 years. i have another scheppach one it it was showing the cable was live and the lap one wasnt, even changed the batteries to see if that was the issue. I always try use 2 or 3 methods to test, not just 1 for this reason.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes sensible to use multiple methods. Thanks for watching!

    • @MarkUKInsects
      @MarkUKInsects 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Try a Fluke pen... built to be reliable and last

    • @markbaker980
      @markbaker980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I had the same with a LAP pen. I’m going to shell out on a Fluke or Megger, as the only brands I trust.

  • @khalsasikhpunjabda
    @khalsasikhpunjabda 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    That device is called 'Tester' and its main purpose is to detect Phase and Neutral in a Single Phase Supply system and NOT 'live' or 'dead' wires. All wires are always assumed to be 'live'.

  • @kipsalviv5742
    @kipsalviv5742 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Neon screwdrivers have saved the day many times. Volt sticks are a liability, All I ever hear is .. damn thing sling it in the skip ,there is a neon in my box.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

    • @keithterry2169
      @keithterry2169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Volt sticks are unreliable, often show "live" on neutral cables or don't work at all; then there is the battery problem. Networks guys that I worked alongside despised volt-sticks.

    • @antlane365
      @antlane365 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both have their place and are useful.

  • @christians6734
    @christians6734 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    What a BS, the resistor inside the probe effectively prevents shock. These probes are still very popular, since they are foolproof to operate, cheap and very safe. A multimeter requires a battery, the correct ramge setting and the cables need to be plugged into the correct sockets. In addition the cables and tips can be worn or damaged over time. What is worst, you have to use both hands, what I try to avoid when working with mains voltage. If sonething goes wrong there is a definite circuit through my body. While when working only with one hand and wearing shoes with rubber soles, I would hardly recognize even if i touch 240V directly with my fingers My safety rule: always keep a hand in my backpocket.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If your boots were fully insulating you from the ground, the screwdriver won’t light anyway….

    • @moby1388
      @moby1388 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If that were the case you would take your boots off.

    • @ruben_balea
      @ruben_balea 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@TheDiligentDIYer1759 Ever heard of capacitative coupling?

    • @martinwragg8246
      @martinwragg8246 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's why you should always test it on known mains before you start testing.
      I have used them for years and never had a problem, however I have had countless multimeter leads go Intermittent which can be far mor dangerous.

    • @michaelwarren2391
      @michaelwarren2391 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you. I was wondering if anyone was going to correct him@@ruben_balea

  • @DWmaniac4n6
    @DWmaniac4n6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Does it have to go to ground? Or does your body provide enough capacitance for the AC current to light the bulb. I have a LED lamp that slightly glows when the light switch is off because of the length of wire that acts as a capacitor. Could you put a capacitor in where the spring is and make it work that way? I do use these from time to time. I believe i remember my highschool electronics teacher taking one of these small bulbs without the resister and doing the same thing, he explained that if he were in contact with the ground he would get a nasty shock. Few of us took up the offer to light up the bulb ourselves.

  • @so_what_else_is_new
    @so_what_else_is_new 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Electrical systems have always the potential of being hazardous, however the fact that no one ever died of using such a screwdriver means something to me. The defaults you described are so very rare, that i never heard of something happening like that.

  • @ciprianwinerElectronicManiac
    @ciprianwinerElectronicManiac หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    These are gold for finding out if you have power on wires that are close to each other, something that a NCV tester cannot do.

  • @daveshongkongchinachannel
    @daveshongkongchinachannel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I recently purchased such a device and will definitely take extra care in future knowing what to look out for now in terms of how it might fail. I think working on 240V and using this device, even if it failed, would at worse give you a nasty zap. I did also purchase one of those plug-in mains testers and it immediately helped me solve 3 potentially dangerous wiring faults that had been in place for years in my home. I would totally recommend to use one of these if at all possible over and above the mains tester featured in this video as it can give you vital information immediately without even having to dismantle anything or directly expose you to any kind of danger.

  • @peat11
    @peat11 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have been using my Vitrex made in Britain one for fifty years with no problems what so ever, would I replace it with an unbranded cheap one I seriously doubt it, a very useful tool but I only give it the slightest touch certainly would not hold there for more than a second or two, it also has a piece you can take out and put a plug fuse in to test the fuse.

  • @midlan6
    @midlan6 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It is not dangerous itself. As every tool, you need to know how to use it. I mostly use it as this as check with this procedure:
    1. touch the live thing I would like to work on with such tester, I expect the tester to light
    2. shut of the breaker
    3. repeat step 1
    4. touch the thing that was live previosly barehands only if the tester does not light

  • @raloed.363
    @raloed.363 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think these work based of the AC as well as the grounds. Because if you have thick rubber shoes on and isolated from ground would the light still turn on ?

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      For me touching the end with an insulated tool didn’t work, I don’t think it would work if you were fully insulated from the ground either. Thanks for watching!

    • @campbeld63
      @campbeld63 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, it does. (I've done it on occasions.) Your body's capacitance is sufficient to light the bulb without you providing a return path.

    • @frv6610
      @frv6610 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TheDiligentDIYer1759 can you the contact pen with lipstick balm fat on your finger to reduce a potential shock from the pen or wont the pen work at all then?

  • @stevoc9930
    @stevoc9930 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    These things are dangerous because they can prove something is live but they can't prove it is dead because you have no way of checking if the thing is actually working. That's why Sparks use voltage testers alongside a proving unit. Having said that even as an Electrician I do have one but only use it for sorting out switching on switches where someone has had a go changing their own switch and messed everything up. It's quicker than using a multimeter. Other than that I wouldn't advise using one. But I doubt anyone has ever actually been shocked through the screwdriver itself.

  • @charlesholder8009
    @charlesholder8009 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hi. I was interested in your saying the red probe on a multimeter should be put into the COM. I did a search and other sites say the black probe goes into the COM. So who is right?

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think you’re right and Im wrong, it won’t make much difference for checking live though. Thanks for watching!

    • @tonywoolf5042
      @tonywoolf5042 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Saying the red probe goes to COM is the 13th stroke of the clock, it casts doubt on all the rest. And advising a multimeter is dubious, there are a lot of cheap ones about that are not properly approved for mains voltage. I can see the argument against neon screwdrivers but you have to keep risks in proportion. I would only use one as a backup check. And two probe testers can give the wrong answer in some situations like lighting circuits.

    • @srambrero
      @srambrero 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheDiligentDIYer1759 dont think half-assing electrical instructions for views or clicks or subs is the way to go...you dont want dead subs right?

    • @rscelectrical7091
      @rscelectrical7091 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely not this one, the BLACK probe goes to the common.

  • @tripplewhipper
    @tripplewhipper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My 2 cents, non contact pen is handy but always confirm with a multimeter if youre going to go hands on/perform work, and always test them on a known love circuit to confirm proper function

  • @martijnveen5694
    @martijnveen5694 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    while i agree that these should not be used for proving live/dead conductors, and for a quick indication a non contact tester will suffice. i use 1 for finding the live wire as normal sockets here dont have a defined live and neutral side. and for my old lathe to run in the right direction i need to know which is which ( and yes i'm setting up a cee socket so its always correctly hooked up later on havn't had the time and space to do so yet ). do you have any insights on how to cheaply identify the live conductor?

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Difficult to know without seeing your exact situation, but a stop gap solution could be a cee to 3 pin converter, they’re pretty cheap and easy to come by. Thanks for watching!

    • @martijnveen5694
      @martijnveen5694 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TheDiligentDIYer1759 yup thats exactly what iv been doing, and have labeled a few sockets with live an neutral side. But confirming whether the person before me actually followed color codes is always the gues. What affordable tool would you recommend for reliably differentiating live and neutral. My non contact isn't to clear about it and doesn't seem like a reliable way to me.

    • @grahamshakeshaft2373
      @grahamshakeshaft2373 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where do you live that you have sockets without a defined live and neutral side. Here in the UK sockets always have defined live and neutral sides.

  • @stevehensonuk
    @stevehensonuk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video thanks - just ordered the non-contact pen from your description!

  • @chyneuze
    @chyneuze 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    And you forgot a big problem, one I experienced once and that definitely convinced me never to use it again. The capacitive coupling between your body and the ground may not be enough to light the neon bulb! Once I wanted to intervene at home on a roller shutter switch located in height, I cut only the circuit of the roller shutter but there was also another cable for a lamp passed in the same places but on another circuit breaker. FYI, I’m on a fiber stepladder (not aluminum ), I take my test screwdriver, no light on all the connectors, I start to work until I take a discharge on the connector pair of the lamp cable. Being above ground on a non-conductive fiber stepladder, the neon bulb was not lit. I repeated the test and it is only by getting closer to the wall of the house or the floor that the bulb began to light...

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good points, thanks for watching!

    • @GDGRailway47712
      @GDGRailway47712 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was going to ask if it would still work if you were in rubber trainers or boots.

    • @cyfralcoot65
      @cyfralcoot65 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@GDGRailway47712Yes, it would work

  • @SuperGeorgeGlass
    @SuperGeorgeGlass 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I used one of these for years and they are quite safe provided (1) use it for mains voltages only. IE. No more than 250 volts. (2) do not use it for RF testing, like high wattage transmitter antennas.

  • @peterbradley4916
    @peterbradley4916 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    First used these over 50 years ago. You can get quality ones (screwfix etc), which are waterproof and tough. If you understand how they work. they can be handy. There are not designed for "Testing", only for indicating there's a voltage present. They can also pick up Disconnected earths/cpc s and neutrals in a circuit if you understand how mains electricity works. They do have the they drawbacks, but what would expect for a couple of quid. Billions have been sold with few issues! I wouldn't use them in my job as an electrician.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good points! Thanks for watching!

    • @kenzo4Ever
      @kenzo4Ever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Below some voltage the light won't glow. You touch the wire and you get shocked ! 😀.
      At an isslated transformer it won't glow at any voltage ! You touch both wire and you get shocked ! 😀

  • @ProfessorMurray
    @ProfessorMurray หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi,
    It would be great if you could update the CC to use proper punctuation to aid accessibility.
    Paul

  • @frankdavis5321
    @frankdavis5321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In over 50years of using one of these small electrical screwdrivers I have never had a problem except for the blade at the end when tightening up screws because it doesn’t seem to be hardened metal

    • @alanstebbings2886
      @alanstebbings2886 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We all do it but they're not intended for use as as screwdriver Don't even ask why they therefore make them with a flat end rather than a point

  • @yiman7370
    @yiman7370 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used to use this since I was 12 years old to this day to check the old style Christmas lights lol. This tool is very useful for checking if there is current in a wire

  • @ThePretender1
    @ThePretender1 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The lamp works by ionizing the gas inside, there is no filament. Even if the lamp breaks as some said, that will not be enough to make proper contact inside and harm you. The only risk is not seeing the light or improper contact.

  • @andrewthacker114
    @andrewthacker114 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have both testers .thanks for sharing. I’ve often wondered how they work, so the body completes the circuit.They are handy .😊

  • @andyxox4168
    @andyxox4168 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    These screwdrivers are great, perhaps in the hands of those not qualified they may be a hazard but with currents of a few hundred uA and resistance over 1MOhm there’re not gonna shock you.

  • @deodatocosta8172
    @deodatocosta8172 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That only becomes dangerous if it gets submerged in water or in some cases if you where bare feet on a wet floor the problem with the touchless ones is they can only tell is there is power (which i already know there is) and not which wire is hot and neutral in order to wire the outlet correctly sometimes the wires are not color coded and even if they are i always check first.

  • @alanjewell9550
    @alanjewell9550 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I have a couple of these & they are very useful & reliable. The concept is sound enough as long as the component ratings & construction are such as to absolutely guarantee the current is going to be very small. I use mine according to the old high voltage working adage of always keep one hand in your pocket & stand on an insulated surface/ insulated boots etc.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching!

    • @odoohub5010
      @odoohub5010 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you stand on an insulated surface, how then will you be grounded for the tester to work?

    • @alanjewell9550
      @alanjewell9550 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@odoohub5010 There is sufficient capacitive coupling between me & earth to allow enough current to flow to illuminate the neon light. It's not as bright as it is if I touch earth, but that buzzes my finger more than I'm comfortable with or feel is 100,% safe. Wouldn't work if it was DC without solid ground connection.

    • @xsc1000
      @xsc1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@odoohub5010 You need very low current to light up the bulb in tester, even capacity of your body to ground is often enough.

  • @Chupacabras222
    @Chupacabras222 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is there any difference between non-contact pen used in video and pens in the link in description? There is LAP MS8907 (price around £20) in video, and some other types of non-contact pens in the amazon link (price around £9).

  • @richardmitchell3136
    @richardmitchell3136 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Blimey, I've been using these most of my life, since I was a kid. I'd just assumed if they were sold to perform the task, they'd be safe and suitable for doing so.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The risk is damage or water ingress. Thanks for watching!

    • @K2teknik.
      @K2teknik. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A lot of unsafe shit is sold out there, it do not mean it is safe or right to use it.

    • @srambrero
      @srambrero 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheDiligentDIYer1759 i think if you look at the numbers of people hurt or killed by them, they are probably safer to use than driving a car. the only thing hes saying there are even safer options out there

    • @rob235ioa1
      @rob235ioa1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they ARE

  • @colinfaed5910
    @colinfaed5910 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have some of these and also the non-contact one. The problem I find with the non-contact one it that where you have several wires close together it is hard to tell which one is live as it picks up from others nearby.

  • @maxtorque2277
    @maxtorque2277 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Few points to make on this one:
    "dangerous" is relative.
    Can you point to a single recorded incidence of an injury from a mains testing screwdriver? I can point to a large number of injuries caused by the incorrect use of a handheld multimeter (Which can fail to show the voltage if you have the setting on it wrong (ie wrong terminals or DC setting) and can actually cause an arc flash over if the wrong settings and terminals are used and which often can have damaged leads due to careless use onlow votlage systems and those leads result in electricution of the user.
    Any "dual" probe tester also carries a risk as those probes can causes shorts in the EUT and necessarily makes those devices a double hand use, which means a current path more likely to cross the users heart
    It's worth noting that the neon bulb used is actually enough to prevent a significant shock on it's own as its ionisation current is very low (hence its use) it is also very very robust and not easily damaged.
    IME, the worst thing about mains testing screwdriver is actually the fact it IS a screwdriver, so people are tempted to use them for other things other than mains testing, often damaging the insulation on the shaft, which can leads to user shocks should the user hold the device below the handle
    The no1 reduction in risk from "proving dead" is making sure you can get a positive identification of the high voltage potential before you attempt to isolate the circuit. IE if you isolate the circuit and use a mains testing device that does not have a proving unit (ie martindale tester etc) you never see a positive result that proves your testing is set up correctly and working as expected. So i always make sure i can measure and get a "live" result, then isolate and make sure i get a "dead" result.....
    Sure, for commercial use you need a proper industry standard tester, but for DIY i'd much rather someone used a testing screwdriver (having proved they get a positive result first before isolation as mentioned) that just guessed....... ;-)

  • @mr.b.4048
    @mr.b.4048 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Have used them as a DIYer for over 40 years, even back when we did electrical work that is not allowed any more. Isolate at the board (in my case in the garage), lock the garage and put key safe, double checks on circuit, and above all don’t work on a live circuit. An early blown fuse after cutting o a live wire, and you learn very quickly what not to do. Non contact tester isn’t always reliable in my experience.

  • @iainamurray
    @iainamurray 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is very useful to know. I'm the most amateur of amateur DIYer and I've had one of these for at least 25 years and have never used it to test for current. The blade is obviously designed for the types of screws you find in electrical components and battery panels on toys etc so it's good to have around. As it's been rattling around my toolbox/kitchen drawer of doom for decades, there's a good chance that void had been bridged and I wouldn't have known to check. Thanks! By the way, can you use a multimeter to check if it's in working order?

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You could put a multimeter with a probe attached to the top and bottom, then measure resistance. It should be very high or give no value at all, if it gives something low, then it’s dangerous to use. Still id just get a non contact tester to be safe. Thanks for watching!

    • @niv8880
      @niv8880 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You've be wise not to listen to this content provider

    • @iainamurray
      @iainamurray 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@niv8880 What piece of information specifically is incorrect?

  • @colinpeacock7648
    @colinpeacock7648 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    May I ask , in what way is this line tester dangerous??? I have , others too have been using this for years on end with no problems as testers have low resistance voltage

    • @VVeiQuek
      @VVeiQuek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      On one hand, we are telling children to not touch current-flowing wires/materials without any insulation to ensure safety.
      On the other, we are expected to probe this metallic rod into the outlet slots without insulators like gloves.
      The idea that one’s body completes the circuit really terrifies outsiders like myself. Also, we would not know if the test pen is malfunctioning or it is indeed not live wire.

  • @Mike40M
    @Mike40M 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The on I had in the sixties was okay for indicating mains voltage, but worthless as a screwdriver. Too easily broken.

  • @DB25k
    @DB25k หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video. It's good to make sure we are safe. I never use that tester again and as you have pointed out, I got myself both the better qualiter tester. Better to spend some money and be working safe.

  • @Rameronos
    @Rameronos หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It seems to me that the author of the video is uncomfortable with the idea that he could be part of an electrical circuit. Many people have used these screwdrivers, but I have never heard of anyone getting electrocuted by them. However, I agree that they do not always correctly detect the absence of current and this can lead to a serious electric shock.

    • @tawnyard4649
      @tawnyard4649 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’m your first. I’ve been electrocuted using one.

  • @bill-2018
    @bill-2018 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1. Turn off the mains at the switch.
    2. Take the fuse out of the fuse box.
    3. Test if it is still live. Don't assume the circuit you are working on is wired to the correct fuse.
    I removed about 16' of lead sheathed wire having crumbling rubber covered wires inside when decorating. I tested them with a multimeter to make sure they were dead before pulling them out. There's still more going into the attic.

  • @FlatEric971
    @FlatEric971 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Also called "widow makers".
    Banned from our site. Anyone caught with one has to return it to their van. Anyone caught using one is kicked off site for the rest of the week - second offence is a ban from site.
    You either use a voltage indicator and proving unit, or find another profession.
    The main issues with those toys are:
    The light can be unclear - as shown in the video
    The "test" voltage uses the body as the return path
    The resistor or neon could go faulty, and give a false "safe" indication.
    Probably others, but in general DIYers don't / won't listen to electrical advice.
    Volt sticks shouldn't be relied upon either. Always follow up proving dead with a voltage indicator and proving unit before work.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad to hear, thanks for sharing and thanks for watching!

    • @niv8880
      @niv8880 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      What sort of people work on your site? Does your site not have anything for regular checks of electrical equipment you use? What training is given? Do the people on your site have no common sense?

    • @FlatEric971
      @FlatEric971 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Working on Data Centre / CoLo / FLS build and upgrades. Yes, I (and my contractors have common sense, and for me - about 30 years experience woking in the industry at voltages from 54V to 132KV. . @@niv8880

    • @tsipiripo66
      @tsipiripo66 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You don't seem to have any relationship with electricity or any experience in the field.

  • @JamesParus
    @JamesParus หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ive heard some of these had just round end and then people used to sharpen them to flathead. And it was not really build to take the force so it could crack the handle.

  • @rajendrabareto8065
    @rajendrabareto8065 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Funny video saying the old tester is dangerous. Using it from 35 years never felt any danger. Any gadget when water goes in will be dangerous.

    • @leechjim8023
      @leechjim8023 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You mean Woolter?!🤣😂🤣😂

    • @rob235ioa1
      @rob235ioa1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      WHO IS WALTER

  • @5084204
    @5084204 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've been using these since I was 15 and started to understand live/neutral difference. Never had a single, slightest issue with these. I always carry one on the jobs-I have that Kews meter, non touch pens and Stanley joist/cable sensor, but that pen is the simplest and fastest device.

  • @MuhammadFarooqKhan-24
    @MuhammadFarooqKhan-24 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We are using this type of tiny tester since in very beginning so how it becomes dangerous. Also we have digital probe like pen tester. You bring new theory may be you are promoting your new tester.

  • @divingdave2945
    @divingdave2945 2 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Mine doesn't have a spring, Just a metal surface. So nothing can really break and it's great to check which contact is hot and which one isn't because I never ever trust he wire color. The biggest problem with these is that they are not fail safe. If a internal contact is broken or the light bulb has a defekt the wire could still be hot even though it's not glowing. Though that's not an issue as long as it is known.
    Btw: I'm always happy to be a part of any circuit as long as the overall resistance relative to the voltage is sufficient.

  • @calinolteanu8079
    @calinolteanu8079 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Very common tool in eastern europe, for decades. Still very much used. Like any tool, needs to be used properly. Also bites if you happen to touch a grounded part while probing. Unfortunately new models seem to come with physically small resistor.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

    • @K2teknik.
      @K2teknik. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you had ever read any old electrician education materiel from eastern Europe you will know that this is not the right tool to use, the right tool is a tester like the one shown at 1:35 in a more bulky variant, but one thing is what people is taught, an other thing is what they do in reality, they sadly often reach out for the easy fix solution.

    • @xsc1000
      @xsc1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@K2teknik. Do you remember how those old voltage testers with 2 probes worked in 50s-80s? They were passive, without batteries and LEDs. It was just coil with core on spring. Impedance of this coil was very low. So if you dropped one probe, you could get shocked easy. Screwdriver tester was in fact much safer. And there was no way to test just one wire if it is life without connecting second probe to good ground.

  • @alexprokhorov407
    @alexprokhorov407 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The problem with non contact is that you can get a lot of false positive because of the cross talk in the wires if there's two out of phase and a neutral/ground

  • @michaelgriffin628
    @michaelgriffin628 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Think you are all missing the point. They should be used as a probe, ie should have a pointed end. Most of them dont, they become flat head screwdrivers and levers by diyers, which are over stressed causing a crack in the shaft, especially cheapo models. Current could pass resistor into crack onto a sweaty hand and there lies the problem. Simples.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s a good point, I haven’t seen one with a pointed end at all, only screwdrivers. Thanks for watching!

  • @dino6627
    @dino6627 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I prefer the screwdrivers with an LED, transistor and a couple of watch batteries, they are brighter and much more sensitive. It can be checked before every use by touching both the tip and cap with a finger, it can also be used for testing continuity of fuses and lamps.

  • @peteratkinson8957
    @peteratkinson8957 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The non-contact testers work on the electric field NOT the magnetic field. The magnetic field is a property of current flow yet these voltage testers work even when no current is flowing.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching

    • @pjeaton58
      @pjeaton58 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly - capacitance coupling .

  • @johnroberts3723
    @johnroberts3723 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice cheap and simple tester👍

  • @dkaloupis75
    @dkaloupis75 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You are right, don’t have one neon in my toolbox but 3 all day long, and let me brake down the news for you . If you are dealing with soak in water tools at electrical installations and repairs you shouldn’t even exist in this world and trade. My opinion

  • @Europhile
    @Europhile 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I found the non-contact tester gave me a false positive when I changed a ceiling light pendant. It indicated that the wiring was live but in fact it was picking up some induced current. I had the MCB turned off. I checked with a neon type screwdriver similar to the one examined. I had previously checked it indicated live reliably when the MCB was turned on. I believe the MCB isolates only the live conductor and not the neutral.

  • @OctavMandru
    @OctavMandru 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Do you know how a neon bulb works? It is basically a filament-less bulb. Which means there is a break in the line.
    It's been used for probably one century already and the risk is close to zero.
    I'll tell you, it is much more dangerous to not have it when you need it

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Neon conducts electricity, the bulb would need to blow to stop current passing through. In the scenarios I mentioned like water ingress, having neon bulb wouldn’t make any difference. Thanks for watching!

  • @vencik_krpo
    @vencik_krpo 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    2:30: That's very nice, but it doesn't solve the problem many of us with old installations have: you've got 2 wires in black isolation _both_ hanging off the wall and have to find out which is live... You would have to displace them substantially, which may not be physically possible or highly inconvenient.

  • @robtmcL12
    @robtmcL12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great, so if you lose your neutral but still have a live, your "professional" 2 pronged tester says it's "dead" while it's clearly NOT.
    Stick to house bashing.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing your opinion

    • @JohnScott-m3i
      @JohnScott-m3i 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most approved voltage testers now will show a voltage if connected to a live wire without the 2nd prob on a neutral or earth

  • @thrumbo
    @thrumbo หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use those for long time. I havent got shocked from it ever. And the ting about contactless tester is that i cant test individual cable if theres more than one line in one place, which is most of the case, or if theres crappy cable work and they somehow use the wrong line as the the live, i cant detect that because it detect all live line close to it.

  • @KevinRudd-w8s
    @KevinRudd-w8s 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When I started work as an apprentice electrician in 1971 I had one of these. The charge hand took it off me and threw it in the bin. He then gave me a proper voltage tester. I have never used a screw driver type voltage tester since and never will. I have never understood why these have not been banned, especially with the amount of perfectly safe test gear that is available today.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Some of them are low-voltage (less than mains voltage), used to troubleshoot automobiles and other circuits.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad to hear it! Thanks for watching!

    • @johnh9449
      @johnh9449 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A neon tester will detect the hazardous condition where all available contacts have become live. The professional testers, multimeter or test lamp will declare the condition safe.

    • @u1zha
      @u1zha 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You sound easily influenced. "The charge hand" did a rampage and you abided. No explanations needed, no braining involved...

    • @KevinRudd-w8s
      @KevinRudd-w8s 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @u1zha Maybe, but In fifty years I never go thrown across the room because a "dead" circuit wasn't
      I know of more than one electrician who couldn't say that after using one of those testers.

  • @ROBOTKO555
    @ROBOTKO555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I mean the argument that something can get inside is quiet pointles, the bottom part and top part are detachable and one of your basic responsibilities is to check your equipment before using it, you can open it up and clean. Second thing is that some of them do not contain spring alone but spring and fuse. The spring wire tho should burn and shouldnt allow you to receive full voltage by design. Another important thing is rating of the tool which needs to be checked as 230-250V in sockets is usually 9A or 16A, anything like 25A and more and the producer of the tester themselves do not recommend to use it.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perhaps older versions can be taken apart, but all the new ones I’ve seen cannot. Thanks for watching

  • @barryfoster453
    @barryfoster453 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm a heating engineer. I have to say that I have been using 'neon screwdrivers' for 50 years (just about to retire) with zero problems. I worked with 45 other engineers...and I've never heard of anyone getting a shock from them. I don't like my 'voltstick', as I find that is unreliable, so is potentially dangerous to trust it. But the 'neon'...no issue.

  • @johnki325
    @johnki325 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I believe I had the first of this type of tester and it worked fine. That was quite a while ago. Now I use an absolutely safe current tester I made myself to test outlets and detect the presences of wiring within walls.

  • @IrisGalaxis
    @IrisGalaxis หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ah the British electrophobia

  • @trickytricky7401
    @trickytricky7401 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have two with no problem for years , very useful with things that may or may not have current like fuse testing

  • @barco123456
    @barco123456 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    this was BS content but luckily the comments are more educational

  • @Callsign-Blade_RunnerSG
    @Callsign-Blade_RunnerSG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, you are absolutely Right. When it comes to Safety, LEAVE NO DOUBTS. 👍🏻 All it takes is Once for fatal accidents to happen.

  • @CommercialGasEngineerVideos
    @CommercialGasEngineerVideos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    These should be banned

    • @jumper233
      @jumper233 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Why?

    • @CommercialGasEngineerVideos
      @CommercialGasEngineerVideos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jumper233 best to use the right tools to check for voltage rather than toys, as electric is not something to play with. Approved voltage indicators etc. When working on 415v etc I wouldn't even imagine getting a toy to test for power. Not these old school DIY gadgets. Heard they have potential to shock but could be hearsay. VDE rated screwdrivers and approved rated voltage indicators. Decent multimeters etc. That's my opinion. Maybe I'm wrong🤔, what do you think

  • @OersJ
    @OersJ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do you check for live wire with no contact?

  • @jonathanwebb8307
    @jonathanwebb8307 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I use both. I like the simplicity of the screwdriver and trust it after many decades of use. It does no harm to double check using two different tools

  • @sicarius100
    @sicarius100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    my first tester was something like this screwdriver, absolutely horrible to use because the little light is barely visible. I bought a no-contact tester which beeps and has a bright LED to use instead, it has worked wonders until today, coincidentally, when it fell on the floor and broke the glass dome on the end :(

  • @Martindyna
    @Martindyna 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Surely the most dangerous thing about these is their similarity to a 12 Volt screwdriver tester. As an apprentice I bought one by mistake (they were alongside each other in the shop carelessly stacked) and I used it on mains 240 V AC and it didn't work. I assume I was saved by my Dr. Martens boots but please nobody try it, I'm not entirely sure.

  • @mickeythompson9537
    @mickeythompson9537 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I love these, mainly because they are the perfect size for small electrical screws, and the perfect size for my hand... I've probably never used them on live circuits, or to test for live.

  • @hoofbags
    @hoofbags 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No doubt there will be moves to ban them. Depends on how used. I was wiring up a two way switched lighting circuit for disabled neighbour, so isolated what I thought was the relevant fuse channel. It wasn't possible to shut off supply at the distribution board, as neighbour felt cold. A 'shared neutral' error meant I could not do a DVM check. While working, the thing lit up, saving me from a shock. These should be for alert purposes only but not as a substitute for a multimeter, I would agree.

  • @pegasBaO23
    @pegasBaO23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Got to be mindfull of potential flaws in the design, that can fail, but aside from that they are pretty safe. For extra safety cross check with different devises

  • @mospeada1152
    @mospeada1152 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've never seen this particular design.
    The one I've used had an old long fuse in it, not a globe. It also had a wire, which inserted into where the button is on this one, to an earth clamp.

  • @wisteela
    @wisteela 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm amazed they still exist. Sometime back I got one from Poundland that works like this, but can also work contactless by pointing the top towards whatever it is. Works really well too.

  • @PetesGuide
    @PetesGuide 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is an awesome video! Thanks in particular for explaining the failure modes of the pen testers. I’ve always felt they were potentially dangerous, but wasn’t sure how they could fail exactly.
    Also, you said two things about the NCVT that are slightly wrong. 1) They sense the electrostatic field, not the electromagnetic field. 2) They do in fact use your body as the return path, and if your boots are too insulating, as you said in another comment about the pen. But they will also fail to work if you’re too far away from the ground, like up on a ladder. I’ve been up on an 8-foot fiberglass ladder and found them to still work, but I’m not sure how much further I could get.

    • @TheDiligentDIYer1759
      @TheDiligentDIYer1759  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!! Thanks for watching!

    • @PetesGuide
      @PetesGuide 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheDiligentDIYer1759 Any comments on my observations about the height above ground limitation on the NCVT? I haven’t been able to test the statements I’ve read on the issue and am wondering if you’ve heard anyone talk on the subject.

  • @petejones1957
    @petejones1957 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thoroughly agree!
    You'll aways get people saying they've used one for years and they're quite safe, however, these are often the people with the least knowledge of electricity and its dangers. They'll assume that if it doesn't light up, then the circuit is not live. Bet they don't first test it on a known live circuit to check its working ok, as you would always use a proving unit on a two prong tester before use.
    I remember as a 12 year old pushing one into a metal clad socket in the school physics lab, shorting it to earth and creating a loud bang and flash. Needless to say, the physics teacher was not impressed, telling me "A little knowledge is a dangerous weapon", how right he was! stay safe!

  • @familyplans3788
    @familyplans3788 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i havent used one of those for years , im not a pro but have done a few houses in my time ( always have had my work checked by a pro) and i have never compromised on my safety equipment and a few years ago i got a Fluke 1AC II VoltAlert - Non-Contact Voltage Detector Pen which wasnt cheap and i trust it BUT if someone is buying one of these things please check its the right voltage range , i didnt even think about it when i bought it and luckily i bought the right one , it was only later that i found out that they do different ranges and if you get the wrong one then it can tell you its dead when in fact its hot , especiallythe cheaper versions may not be as described
    love your videos

  • @markpritchard
    @markpritchard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've got one only it has an earth to complete a circit. I would never use it on my house but i do use it on my car, motorbike and tractor. For the house i have a contactless one that works really well. I also have a multimeter but if your trying to find out if there is a live 240v then use a contactless device.

  • @Joseph-Lau
    @Joseph-Lau หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for this video. I though it is just me being skeptical as I never use it during my electronic engineering as well as applied physics training. I just don't like the idea of letting current pass through my body, I always use my Fluke multimeter instead.

    • @bill-2018
      @bill-2018 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have one but only use it as a screwdriver.
      I switch off at the switch, remove the main fuse then test with my Hilka multimeter. You never know if it is wired to the correct fuse.