Idk where the farm land story origin is from but in most places the courts would've allowed the one party to buy out the other half if they still wanted to reside on the property while one half wanted to sell it off. Residents would've gotten first dibs not some rando
*The* *second* *story.* Sad the Aunt resorted to illegal activity and spent money too early, but there is a bottom line here, and that is, *half* the property was her inheritance too. What the Aunt should have done was force a buyout. The resident family should have just raised the mortgage to accomplish that, with a payment plan to the Aunt if absolutely necessary, if she would accomodate that. The guest house could have been rented out or used as a B&B to raise passive income. I do see both sides of the dispute but it is not reasonable for the resident family to treat the property as theirs and only theirs in perpetuity, denying the Aunt her rightful inheritance. Granny f*d up.
In the second story of the aunt. Whoever's been paying the taxes on it which is probably the mother and daughter if they paid 100% of the taxes and can prove that the aunt did not pay any of them for the entire time 7 years the property is 100% theirs
The second story of the aunt sounds like the aunt has some problems behind the scene any from drug to gambling problems to simply been living too fast and it been starting to catch up to the aunt. As people pushing real hard to sell the land tends to be having problems of some sort or is too greedy for their own good.
Idk where the farm land story origin is from but in most places the courts would've allowed the one party to buy out the other half if they still wanted to reside on the property while one half wanted to sell it off. Residents would've gotten first dibs not some rando
Aunt had a right to cash out her portion, why OP's family just didn't get a bank loan to buy her half is puzzling.
*The* *second* *story.* Sad the Aunt resorted to illegal activity and spent money too early, but there is a bottom line here, and that is, *half* the property was her inheritance too. What the Aunt should have done was force a buyout. The resident family should have just raised the mortgage to accomplish that, with a payment plan to the Aunt if absolutely necessary, if she would accomodate that. The guest house could have been rented out or used as a B&B to raise passive income. I do see both sides of the dispute but it is not reasonable for the resident family to treat the property as theirs and only theirs in perpetuity, denying the Aunt her rightful inheritance. Granny f*d up.
That last story still needs a bigger conclusion
In the second story of the aunt. Whoever's been paying the taxes on it which is probably the mother and daughter if they paid 100% of the taxes and can prove that the aunt did not pay any of them for the entire time 7 years the property is 100% theirs
I do not think it works this way. Especially because the whole inheritance was used by OP's family and aunt was not getting any benefit from it.
Gazumping is a specifically English experience, not sure about Wales or Northern Ireland but Scottish Laws prevent it at least usually.
This aunt just too greedy, this aunt also lie about the property
Aunt just wanted her part of the inheritance.
The second story of the aunt sounds like the aunt has some problems behind the scene any from drug to gambling problems to simply been living too fast and it been starting to catch up to the aunt.
As people pushing real hard to sell the land tends to be having problems of some sort or is too greedy for their own good.
Why does this channel never read full stories only part of them?