Love this. Loved the dive into the history, and looking forwards to the future... Not to mention, I found the difference between CDP and WebDriver super useful
Does WebDriver BiDi support controlling browsers in remote contexts? For example, I have a Linux VM running on my Windows host. The VM has my development environment and I want to debug my automated browser tests visually by inspecting the browser UI to see what's going on. Can I launch Chrome with a special flag, forward a specific port to my VM using SSH port tunneling then control the Windows browser from my Linux VM?
I'm developing my own WebDriver. Initially, I decided to use CDP, but later I found BiDi to be more universal. However, when I started creating my own API to work with BiDi, I encountered many issues: fewer functionalities and lower performance. To be honest, I couldn't find a compelling reason to use BiDi, considering that the Quantum engine, used in Firefox-based browsers, only accounts for 5-9% of browser usage worldwide
![เปิดบ้าน โคตรสวย ป๋องกพล รู้จักตั้งนาน เพิ่งรู้ว่ารวย!!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tmgCF_2HfYI/mqdefault.jpg)
Subscribe to Google Chrome Developers → goo.gle/ChromeDevs
Love this. Loved the dive into the history, and looking forwards to the future... Not to mention, I found the difference between CDP and WebDriver super useful
This is so educational and informative. The presenter did an excellent job!
Can I ask the font used for the sample code?
Excellent explanation, and that set design is beautiful!
Great content! Clear and easy to understand! Love it! 👏👏
Does WebDriver BiDi support controlling browsers in remote contexts? For example, I have a Linux VM running on my Windows host. The VM has my development environment and I want to debug my automated browser tests visually by inspecting the browser UI to see what's going on. Can I launch Chrome with a special flag, forward a specific port to my VM using SSH port tunneling then control the Windows browser from my Linux VM?
I'm developing my own WebDriver. Initially, I decided to use CDP, but later I found BiDi to be more universal. However, when I started creating my own API to work with BiDi, I encountered many issues: fewer functionalities and lower performance. To be honest, I couldn't find a compelling reason to use BiDi, considering that the Quantum engine, used in Firefox-based browsers, only accounts for 5-9% of browser usage worldwide
Great Content, Thanks ! Learned about Webdriver evolution and latest approach !
Is BIDI ready now and stable??
What a great video!
This is phenomenal
wow loved it, hit subscribe from now !
Jacelyn did a killer job with this
Great work! Future is bright for Selenium and other tools...
what about safari support?
🎉🎉🎉
Its By-Die not Bee-Dee. Now I would remember
If it's by-die, maybe it comes from bi-directional?
@@li_tsz_fung yes, definitely. Its acronym for bi-directional
Very rich -- the presenter is funny, too. 🙂 (Good job)
and not so famous Rufaydium Webdriver for Autohotkey
I really like your Malaysian slang 😎😊
i'm more comfortable saying "beedee" 😎
No more CDP, yeee