Hey guys! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter.(Since the algorithm is not helping us in terms of views😅). You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us!
@@pro_videos_real Pluto is still a planet. Even though I'm a rocket scientist, astronomers were speaking out their kiesters when they demoted it. Evil, vile people be they.
@@jamesjellishe said that Neptune was discovered in the 1800's. He said that it was Uranus that was discovered in the 17th century. Get a hearing aid.
The ancient Summerians and Assyrians declared that the planet named Tiamat resided between Mars and Jupiter. Tiamat was destroyed by a massive planet Named Marduk in a castatrophic collision, and created the Asteroid Belt with the residue. Was the ancients correct?
It's possible. JWST has only been out for a year and can only look at one part of the sky at a time so it's not like it can see everything. And at the same time, we have been able to see places like the Orion cluster and the Northern star for millennia but it wasn't until 1930 thay we first saw Pluto!!
Planets don't emit light, which is why we can see stars so far away, but we haven't found all bodies orbiting the Sun. Overly simplistic explanation, but generally correct.
@@victoriafarrar906 no, not at all correct. JWST doesn't even read visible light but infrared spectrum. If it's out there, JWST will see it and "scientist" will render a visual photo representation of the "cosmos". It's not real, you know.
Pluto is my baby and will always be a planet in my heart. In fact yes it may qualify as a dwarf planet but it needs to be made an honorary Planet because it's the right thing to do. Pluto has been with us this entire time Pluto deserves better.
Im a bit conflicted by the footage you are showing throughout this video. The information itself is historically interesting of course. But your choice of planetary / orbital footage is very misleading - and diminishes the experience for learners. You show an animation of what is clearly a frozen over planet earth (with visible continent outlines) but label it phaeton. And Your representation of the asteroid belt is very compact - like you’d expect from a star wars scene as opposed to the reality. I’m always interested in the content, but it feels like someone asked an AI to just randomly splice together space animations, and you just did a voiceover on top of it without syncing things up or showing us pertinent animations.
@@XXplosiveUK seems unethical not to include a clear disclaimer at the beginning of each video. or at the very least reference this fact in the channel details.
It's called "Insane Curiosity" for a reason. But you also shouldn't expect Triple-A content from friggin TH-cam.😂 You people are so anal about shit like this. Just sit back and enjoy the free content instead of being so nitpicky.
If Pluto isn't a planet, neither is Mercury. Both are of equal size and Pluto has a higher mass density. The idea that Pluto wasn't a planet is that Pluto and Charon look like a pair of moons orbiting each other and getting steadily, slowly closer. And quite probably were separate bodies in separate orbit before coming too close and getting caught in each other's gravity. So technically, if it is anything but a planet, it is a binary planet. Because Mercury, despite being the same size, isn't a dwarf planet and is regarded as a full blown planet despite having lower mass at the same size. Thus it logically is more qualified to be claimed as a dwarf planet than Pluto.
@@Mapbulidermapping Charon, Pluto's moon, is smaller than mercury. Many people confuse the size of Pluto and Charon. Pluto is a couple KM larger diameter at it's equator than mercury is. Charon is about 3/4 the size of earth's moon, and half the size of Pluto. Mercury is confirmed to be of around equal size to the moon You should take your own advice there.
in 2021 an Astrophysics' released a computer model showing the planet Between Mars & Jupiter broke up 35,000 years ago. They found a Sumerian tablet telling how a planetary body passed through our system on a cometary path. As it came past Jupiter it took 2 moons from Jupiter 1 of which smashed into Tiermet, as known by the Sumerians, & the debris also hammered Mars.
Phaeton the planet between Mars an Jupiter, was destroyed in a Nuclear War . The Martians, 75kya. The majority of Earths impacts came from that exsplosion.
Amazing what is written on Sumerian mud tablets, nobody of us can verify. How you know? You can read Cuneiform, or just watching too much anunnaki-videos ?
35,000 years ago is at least 27,500 years earlier than the Sumerian civilization formed. That's quite a gap of time for anyone to be knowing anything. 35,000 years ago was the Upper Paleolithic or late Stone Age.
@@1pcfred But the knowledge was not lost cause Faethonians and late Martians come to Earth after destroyng Mars 10 000 year later. All humans are in reality original Martians.
I'm hoping the increasing power of computers and AI with simulations like the one mentioned at the end help us narrow this down a bit quicker, hopefully we see some new news within the next few decades!
The problem is even if it is correct it assumes the planets still are in the positions where they were formed. We don't know if they are, we mostly see planets like Jupiter close to the sun in other systems but we don't know if they form there and ours have wandered or if the others have done so, or even if they can form in different places. You are right that we can't exactly say it is wrong, all the planets are not exactly where the model suggest they should be but in the general area and they could have moved since. But to actually make a revised version of the model we need to be able to study many different systems with all their planets, old Titus did not have enough information to make a 100% correct model at the time, but his idea isn't stupid. There must be some kind of rules for how solar systems forms, it might be different for each type of sun too which explains why the Trappist system is so odd. I would guess that we might revisit the idea some years from now when we have more to work with, if we look at other similarly large stars systems we might be able to make something more exact and figure out more about our own system at the same time.
@@kaslo1462 Yeah, I don't think the idea that planets forms a certain distance from eachother is wrong. When a gas cloud turns into a system with gravity, there must be certain rules and if we get enough information, we can use that to make a new model. When Titus formed the original one he had 6 planets to go on and a 7th that doesn't actually exist. He also didn't know the exact correct distances so of course his calculations are wrong. And you have exceptions like being too near Jupiter might stop the forming of a planet but any theory have exceptions. The idea that you can mathematically make a formula though, I think is correct.
@@loke6664 The idea is being revisited even now. I'll stick to the logic of an exploding planetary body between Mars and Jupiter. At least the asteroid belt(s) exists, while there is zero proof of sycretion disks. Just a conjecture to explain planetary formation of which theoretical astrophysicists and astronomers (that's why they call it theoretical) actually know nothing of.
Speculation doesn't belong here. We could also that Saturn and Jupiter had danced between one another and whatever remained as the asteroid belt was the result. It could have been two moons that collided one from Saturn and one from Jupiter. As it has been speculated Saturn and Jupiter switch places... but we were not there and we have never taken samples of the asteroids in the asteroid belt...so we should consider more than one theory here...
When you were studying the texts, of course you learned to read cuneiform, you noticed of the 30,000 tablets so far found that they mention a wide variety of subjects. The tablets that talk about the Blue Green giants also references what we today call Mars and Venus @@guruware8612
@@guruware8612everyone claims to know the sumerian texts but never read them... it's ODD. I still dont know why people think the asteroid belt is Tiamat when the sumerian texts clearly state it is not. Marduk kills *Tiamat* and her body becomes the *Earth* it's very clear. Other legends say that "Phaeton, Marduk, or Maldek" are the asteroid belt.... none of them say Tiamat is the asteroid belt so idk where the confusion about these stories comes from.
Wait a minute... This "Goblin planet" was found in 2015, "three years ago"? So this video isn't a few months old; it's actually from 2018! Is the "goblin planet" actually Eris?
** NOTE: The asteroid belt is a planet that never fully formed. This was due because of thermal convection conveyance, whilst the inner planets formed from thermal conduction conveyance, & the outer planets formed due to thermal radiation conveyance. Per as the asteroid belt is in between the rocky inner planets & the outer gaseous planets. ~ Another factor involved in the failed to form planet is the gravitational pull of the Sun & planet Jupiter. Lastly, the asteroid belt's location coincides with the chemical properties between the Actinides & the Lanthanides. With their properties also in direct relation to their thermal convection conveyance properties. ~ The asteroid Ceres met minimal dwarf planet status requirements in 2006. ~ Also, an interesting fact is that when the sun finally dies in 8+ billion years, it will emit radiation that will power the next solar system, within our solar system, when our dying sun emits enough radiation from the point where the asteroid belt is now located, towards Jupiter, which will ignite Jupiter into the next sun of a solar system, with it's now orbiting satellites becoming planets.
Our solar system has been routinely visited by other stars passing close to or within our Ort cloud. Shulz"s star is an example. It's probably a safe bet to expect all stars to have an ort cloud. Stars don't have to collide, but what about their ort clouds? When that happens, expect things to go flying in every direction, inward, outward, and an exchange of comets and asteroids and even planets. Don't expect these objects to orbit in the same plane as the native objects.
That's true but the orbits of distant bodies align in a way that would if there was a planet 9, in the absence of planet 9 the orbits would be randomly scattered.
@AlanRangel5 They would, if they had time to do so and settle into orbits. And we haven't even considered rogue planets causing this before they went bye-bye. Nor has the material from other passing stars being transferred to our solar system been studied. For all we know right now, Bigfoot is doing this. Look for the rogues.
All stars originate in clusters, formed from contracting nebulae. From there, stars migrate away until the cluster is dissipated. So, while stars may have close encounters with each other, early on, there isn't a lot of close encounters that have been observed by astronomers. The planets in our solar system have essentially been in the same orbits for 4.5 billion years, undisturbed by passing stars. Any close encounter in that time would have disrupted the orbits beyond recognition.
Since I was a young man in the late 70's, I've thought that there used to be a planet where the Asteroid Belt is. When the planet was destroyed, it formed the Asteroid Belt. This is the first time I've heard someone else mention this theory.
The problem with that theory is that there’s an extremely small amount of material in the asteroid belt, not even enough to make a 10th of our moon. Certainly not enough to compose a planet.
But the matter that's contained in the asteroid belt is not all of the material that would come from a mega-earth exploding. An explosion of such a planet would result in material being flung throughout the solar system. It would also include the Oort Cloud, the Kuiper Belt objects, all asteroids, and comets orbiting the Sun. It might even include most of the moons orbiting the planets within our solar system. This might also be the origin of the earth's moon. Now, is this enough material?@@Cursalock
There is no scientific theory that states the asteroid belt CANT be the remains of a destroyed planet. Only that the remains of such a planet appear to not be all contained in that one orbit around the sun. Also, the amount of material believed to be in the asteroid belt is merely an estimation based on observations. What is the most likely and obvious answer to what is the asteroid belt? What is the most likely thing to be found orbiting the Sun that could produce a debris field of that size? There are no "Moons" that orbit the Sun. ...
@@ldfox11 Well said! You said that this is the first time you ever heard anyone mention the "asteroid belt came from a destroyed planet" theory, correct? Well, if you haven't already, I recommend that you read "The Earth Chronicles," by Zecharia Sitchin. This is a scholarly 7-volume discussion about this and many other fascinating aspects of the ancient history of our solar system, and if Earth itself. Enjoy!
This video was on my recommended tab and it picked my interest so i started to watch and this was amazing if you turn your brain off and decide that you are watching an alternate universe.
Dwarf planets are still planets in the same fashion that dwarf stars are still stars. They are both still celestial objects categorized as planets or stars so should still be listed in the Solar System as PLANETS, no matter how small.
The idea "Maybe we mistook a missing planet for a faraway star" is impossible. Stars emit light, but planets do not, they may reflect light, but they may not
There was intelligent life on the planet. It resembled what China is today. After the planet was destroyed, some of its people became humans on Earth, but others became Bigfoots and Sasquatches.
What if the Titus-Bode law was predicting where the planet would be, if the asteroid belt had successfully formed a planet during the formation of the solar system
This video never mentioned the planetary migration of Jupiter, its postulated that none of the planets now reside in the orbit in which they were originally formed.
What I think is that as long as we keep working at it and looking, we will answer these questions one day and one day soon if technological advancement pace has shown.
Phaeton, I believe is actually Tiamat. Genesis describes Niberu colliding with Tiamat. The asteroid belt was formed and the core of Tiamat, the watery giant, was shoved into orbit with the Moon, Kingu, which became the earths satellite. So there was another planet which isn't there now, only an asteroid belt. The planet is now the earth and shares it's orbit with Kingu, who was denied it's tablet if destiny, aka orbit. It's explained in the writings of Zechariah Sitchen.
11:28 aren't there models that show it's possible jupiter could've formed closer to sun and moved to its current orbit, rearranging other planets in the process and possibly causing destruction of a planet that formed the asteroid belt?
There are some models that show that’s exactly what happened. I’m not sure what level of confidence astronomers have in that being correct, merely that it’s possible. As an aside it also offers a possible solution to why we’ve found so many “hot jupiters”orbiting other stars at insanely close distances.
@@clayfoster8234 - now that you remind me with mention of hot Jupiters, it's basically made up of the same stuff as the sun. Jupiter is 90% hydrogen. That's the same thing the sun burns as fuel in its fusion reaction to create byproduct helium "ash". So, the key ingredient of Jupiter was clumping up at the center of the solar system. To bad we can't just send a science ship out to observe stellar nurseries to see how various stars and near star gas giants are formed!
According to Immanuel Velikovsky, Venus was in a different orbit, bounced off Mars ( Paul McCartney sang about it ) and careered into our other Moon sending it on a long trip up Uranus after smacking into the fifth planet Mahdickus destroying it. Earth became a shooting gallery resulting in the annihilation of the dinosaurs, but not before the Pakleds packed up their belongings and took off for the stars.
It can be a rogue planet that was caught by our Sun's gravity which is large enough to make difference in gravity around Senda and other frozen small icy moons
Many things about the Solar System can be learned by researching the writings of ancient cultures around the world, including Sumerian. Also Emanuel Velikovsky has written extensively on the subject.
Zecharia Sitchin suggested that the goddess known to the Sumerians as Tiamat in fact relates to a planet that was destroyed by a rogue planet known as Nibiru, creating both Earth and the asteroid belt
Correct! I'm a huge fan of the late Zecharia Sitchin, and have read several of his many fine works. What you mentioned in your comments is true, according to Sitchin, who studied numerous translations of extremely ancient Sumerian and Akkadian tablets, and later, several texts from ancient Egypt and Babylon, as well. One point I'd like to add here is that Nibiru is also the home planet of the so-called Annunaki, an alien race millions of years older (and incredibly more technologically advanced) than humans. According to Sitchin's works, these beings came to Earth several hundred thousand years ago, and among other spectacular feats, altered the genetic code of lower primates to essentially "create" humans! Thanks for your excellent comment! I would appreciate your thoughts (and fact-checking! 😉 ) of what I've added. Thanks!
2:21 remember that when they say this star this far this big around go planet this size this orbit and THERE WATER. cant even find planet own solar system that are BIGGER bcoz they closer
Insane Curiosity, good video, well thought out. However, when you got out toward possibilities past Pluto, several made me turn my head when they were pronounced. Two of the 3 were pronounced differently than you did, and Wikipedia agreed with me. They were Tyche (rather than rhyming with the exercise method, they had it as TIE-key), and Ceres as 'series'.
A distant planet in our own solar system would be harder to detect than an exoplanet, because you can find exoplanets by watching for them to transit past their star, wheras a distant planet in our own solar system would be very dark and hard to find.
Both Phaeton 9:43 and that hypothetical planet 1:37 with the 70-million-year orbital period (that lies on the outskirts of the Solar System) seem to have land masses very similar in appearance to the land masses of Earth
I love learning about anything that has to do with astronomy. I'll be 49 years old soon and I have never, ever heard about this before. Is this some sort of new Mandela effect? Did it just get that little coverage? Why have I never heard about this until now?
This video isn't new, it's internally dated from 2018. The "goblin planet" is probably Eris, and there are many others like it. @@StrangeHappening-iu4fu
Many star systems are binary and trinary. There is also a theory of a brown dwarf (a failed star) in a very large orbit. This star does not radiate light but has immense gravity and magnetism. Theory is as it closes in in the sun the gravity interactions are asteroids being dislodged, the sun coronal ejections increase, and may have caused Uranus to flip sideways.
The fifth planet used to be where earth is, but was called something else at that time. One of our existing planets within our solar system, was a roge planet and it hit the planet ki. ( now called earth) this collision created the astroid belt, as our planet earth used to be much bigger than it is today. The remains of the planet ki was pushed to where earth is today. The planet that hit our earth may have been Mars, as it is highly scarred. The water from the original planet recollest onto ki. That is why our planet earth was covered by so much water for millions of years. Eventual water evaporation into space removed much of the water over the span of millions of years. The Annunaki discovered the planet and called it ki. The Annunaki come from another roge planet that has a celestrial orbit of 36000 years around our sun, and is on its way back to the sun currently. Almost no light from our sun hits that planet currently, but in about 800-900 years ftom now, it will be closer and telescopes will be able to see it then.
The amount of material in the Asteroid belt is significant, but it's not exactly like pictures portray. Let me explain... The asteroids are actually spaced apart significantly and few really do interact. Vesta is a large asteroid, or possibly a minor planet that failed to garner enough material to form. Ceres is the same. However, there is NOT enough material, even if you combine Vesta, Ceres, and even the captured asteroids Phobos and Deimos that are orbiting Mars to make a significantly sized planet near the size of Mars. You might get a minor planet the size of Ganymede or Pluto, but not enough to match Mars on the same scale. The Asteroid belt was just debris. Some formed small planetoids like Vesta and Ceres but many asteroids are hundreds to thousands of kilometers apart and few have enough mass to do much against the other.
Some planet like Venus, Earth or Mars have exchanged orbits. So now we have planet betwen Mars and Jupiter, its Mars, Earth or Venus itself.... Theres should be two planet so close each one as are Earth and Mars 1-1,52 AU, cause after Venus 0,72 AU. Earth should be at 1,4 AU and Mars should be on 2,8 AU where is now asteroid field....
Why do the astronomers think planet nine is in a slow orbit? What if it is a fast orbit? Maybe extremely fast so it cannot be caught by a slow telescope.
According to Sumerian clay tablets written in Cuneiform script the planet was called Trimat. A moon of the planet Nibiru struck it causing it to change its orbit, we now call it Earth. Debris that was knocked off Trimat, formed the asteroid belt.
Nope ... niburi is fiction.. The Planet is the planet Nagarith, Home of the Serpent ppl, almost 3times Earth size... Because of its extremely low, Magnetic an Gravitational attraction (3 times less than earth) it's at the Mercy of every Galaxy it passes through, an is punted from Galaxy to Galaxy, exactly the same fate as our moon, until it arrived in our Solar System app' 14k ya, it has no control over its wanderings what so ever .. because of that it's arrival in our Solar System fluctuates, its orbit brings it to our parameters every, 3400/3700k yrs...
That sounds like Zechariah Sitchin, i never read his stories.. i know it's not the sumerian tablets because I read them... the Sumerian tablets clearly state that Tiamat is Earth... Did Sitchin say that the Asteroid belt is Tiamat, is that why so many peiple are confused? The Asteroid belt that came from a planet is known as Phaeton, Maldek... or Marduk. Now... what the Sumerians were likely referencing... if they knew what actually happened was what we call the Theia hypothesis... Theia would be Marduk's arrow that split Tiamat, made THE EARTH and "the heavens" likely a reference to the moon. The Sumerian texts refer to Tiamats Body as the earth 🌎... just look up Marduk and Tiamat all the translations say the same thing, Tiamat is earth... why would they write a creation story about an uncreated planet anyway?
I believe there is a large dim star out there past the Oort Cloud there is difficult for us to see there is a lot of bodies that pull outward, and then back in imagine two stars, circling, one another like a cosmic dance, spinning around a central point with their own planets, but also with planets that orbit, both we know enough about our universe and galaxy to say it’s one way or the other theory is just that theory it’s not provable yet and it’s not admissible yet let your imagination run rampant that is how the best theories are formed
Look up Zecharia Sichins translation of the Sumarian Tablets. It speaks of a planet between Mars and Jupiter. After a collision with another distance orbiting planets moon the asteroid belt and Earth came from this planet.
This is probably a dumb comment… But I just don't understand how we can pick up chemicals on planets and different solar systems and we don't have the technology to determine if there is a ninth planet? Somebody please explain.
Detecting chemicals on distant planets uses spectrometry, which analyzes light to determine composition. Finding a ninth planet is harder because it doesn't emit light. We rely on indirect methods like observing gravitational effects or using powerful telescopes.
Hypothetically, if every massive body in the asteroid belt coalesced into a single celestial body it would only be half the size of our moon. So it's kind of hard to reputably claim that there is a possible planet there. Not to mention that the gravitational effect of Jupiter on the asteroid belt pretty much ensures the individual asteroids will almost certainly never combine into a single planet, even if they once were a planet. Assuming they were once a planet, most likely most of that planet's mass would've been ejected from the orbital area that makes up the asteroid belt when the collision that destroyed the hypothetical planet occurred.
But you took wrong acusation that after destoying planet all the mass keppt is on asteroid field, what is incorect cause after explosion 90% of the mass escaped his orbital, some parts went to Sun some are comet now and some changed his orbital, Moon can be original Moon of Faethon.... Even Mars and Earth can be originaly originated from Asteroid field....
I'm sorry, but I still really hate hearing it referred to by the number 9. First of all, the, X, referred to it's mysterious nature..not that it's originally believed to be the 10th planet. Second, because it is the standard reference for an unknown element in in the scientific field.
There isn't enough to make a planet; the asteroid belt is only about 1% the mass of the earth. Mars is only 10% the mass of the earth. Jupiter swallowed the other 89% up.
@@cbuzz2371 that's what NASA told you. to convince you planets arent Hollow, the debri of the Asteroid belt would make a Planet 3times the moon's size.
Ever seen a video of somebody shooting a watermelon? The scraps fly in every direction. Very little of the original planet would have been captured in a stable orbit. Look for the rest among the stars.
@21:00 here's a thought, some scientific opinion suggests that our sun has a twin, as most systems appear to be binary, so do we have a rare binary system made up of two solar systems? An anchor star at each end, some planets orbiting each star, and a small handful of shared planets orbiting both stars, which accounts for the highly elliptical orbits of the outer planets, as well as the perihelic orbits of all other planets.
I was just thinking the same thing but it not being a live star like our but instead a brown darf which are failed stars that are bigger than Jupiter but yet smaller than the sun. I'm thinking that it maybe a failed red darf that didn't complete the stages of fusion!
@@kelvinhooks9399 going by another video that I've recently seen, it need to be active, and producing or emitting solar electricity to have enough gravitational pull
If science is still learning then what good did it do to test me in school on these things you don't know for sure about because you keep changing your minds? Good thing they taught me Pluto was a planet, it made huge difference in my life and I couldn't have been successful without it.
Hey guys! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter.(Since the algorithm is not helping us in terms of views😅). You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us!
Neptune was discovered in the 19th century dude.
there's 8 planets edit: it depends if you think planet 9 exists then there's 9
@@pro_videos_real Pluto is still a planet. Even though I'm a rocket scientist, astronomers were speaking out their kiesters when they demoted it. Evil, vile people be they.
@@jamesjellishe said that Neptune was discovered in the 1800's. He said that it was Uranus that was discovered in the 17th century. Get a hearing aid.
A book I read in High School in the 1960's started with a "quote" of Kepler being "Between Mars and Jupiter, I shall put a planet."
The ancient Summerians and Assyrians declared that the planet named Tiamat resided between Mars and Jupiter. Tiamat was destroyed by a massive planet Named Marduk in a castatrophic collision, and created the Asteroid Belt with the residue.
Was the ancients correct?
No.
@@ReggieArford :-)
@@ReggieArford Search our brain. Obtain. Use,
Where's Marduck now ?
@@paperboy...8667 Probably down the local pond with the other Malards?
The James Webb telescope can see 13 billion light years into the universe but we can’t see a planet in our own backyard? You guys are cracking me up.
It's possible. JWST has only been out for a year and can only look at one part of the sky at a time so it's not like it can see everything.
And at the same time, we have been able to see places like the Orion cluster and the Northern star for millennia but it wasn't until 1930 thay we first saw Pluto!!
Planets don't emit light, which is why we can see stars so far away, but we haven't found all bodies orbiting the Sun. Overly simplistic explanation, but generally correct.
@@victoriafarrar906 no, not at all correct. JWST doesn't even read visible light but infrared spectrum. If it's out there, JWST will see it and "scientist" will render a visual photo representation of the "cosmos". It's not real, you know.
@@victoriafarrar906 seeing 13B LY away and can't see the moon. Aww, shucks...
@@rynebozzell 🤣
Pluto is my baby and will always be a planet in my heart. In fact yes it may qualify as a dwarf planet but it needs to be made an honorary Planet because it's the right thing to do. Pluto has been with us this entire time Pluto deserves better.
oh, that poor pluto, having a furby-pluto too?
@guruware8612 it must be nice to not have anything you hold close to your heart. I envy you.
Im a bit conflicted by the footage you are showing throughout this video. The information itself is historically interesting of course. But your choice of planetary / orbital footage is very misleading - and diminishes the experience for learners. You show an animation of what is clearly a frozen over planet earth (with visible continent outlines) but label it phaeton. And Your representation of the asteroid belt is very compact - like you’d expect from a star wars scene as opposed to the reality. I’m always interested in the content, but it feels like someone asked an AI to just randomly splice together space animations, and you just did a voiceover on top of it without syncing things up or showing us pertinent animations.
This is a good comment 🙂
AI writes and narrates all these videos.
ahh well that explains why the voice over is so bad and the video is all wrong. i’ll definitely unsubscribe and block this channel - thank you
@@XXplosiveUK seems unethical not to include a clear disclaimer at the beginning of each video. or at the very least reference this fact in the channel details.
@@nstig8or totally agree
Truth is we know very little. Thanks for the video, I always learn something new from them.
Phaeton was real.
Everybody knows the time lords destroyed planet five to get rid of the Fendahl.
And the planets seen at 1:37 and 9:43 have land masses very similar to those of the Earth, like Mondas did 😅
What are the time lords I only know 1 lord and that is Jesus
I hadn't known anything about that!
Thanks for letting me know! 😁
20 seconds in, there’s already an error. Read the rest of this comment section… I think I’m in the wrong place.
I'm telling you...
It's called "Insane Curiosity" for a reason. But you also shouldn't expect Triple-A content from friggin TH-cam.😂 You people are so anal about shit like this. Just sit back and enjoy the free content instead of being so nitpicky.
I don't think this is something for you. "20 seconds in" meaning you did not finish the video. Move on, man.
Have you not read an astronomy book from the 18th century, this is common core stuff dude 😂😂
If Pluto isn't a planet, neither is Mercury. Both are of equal size and Pluto has a higher mass density. The idea that Pluto wasn't a planet is that Pluto and Charon look like a pair of moons orbiting each other and getting steadily, slowly closer. And quite probably were separate bodies in separate orbit before coming too close and getting caught in each other's gravity. So technically, if it is anything but a planet, it is a binary planet. Because Mercury, despite being the same size, isn't a dwarf planet and is regarded as a full blown planet despite having lower mass at the same size. Thus it logically is more qualified to be claimed as a dwarf planet than Pluto.
Mercury is a planet. Mercury is also much larger than Pluto.
Look at them compared before commenting, please.
@@Mapbulidermapping Charon, Pluto's moon, is smaller than mercury. Many people confuse the size of Pluto and Charon. Pluto is a couple KM larger diameter at it's equator than mercury is. Charon is about 3/4 the size of earth's moon, and half the size of Pluto. Mercury is confirmed to be of around equal size to the moon You should take your own advice there.
@@HFRG-zq1qm pluto is literally smaller than the f*cking moon
@@HFRG-zq1qm Pluto is smaller than the moon.
Please get your size calculations right next time.
I heard somebody else making an argument that Pluto should be a planet because it has a magnetic field…
in 2021 an Astrophysics' released a computer model showing the planet Between Mars & Jupiter broke up 35,000 years ago.
They found a Sumerian tablet telling how a planetary body passed through our system on a cometary path. As it came past Jupiter it took 2 moons from Jupiter 1 of which smashed into Tiermet, as known by the Sumerians, & the debris also hammered Mars.
Sumerians weren't invented 35,000 years ago. This is nonsense.
Phaeton the planet between Mars an Jupiter, was destroyed in a Nuclear War .
The Martians, 75kya.
The majority of Earths impacts came from that exsplosion.
Amazing what is written on Sumerian mud tablets, nobody of us can verify.
How you know? You can read Cuneiform, or just watching too much anunnaki-videos ?
35,000 years ago is at least 27,500 years earlier than the Sumerian civilization formed. That's quite a gap of time for anyone to be knowing anything. 35,000 years ago was the Upper Paleolithic or late Stone Age.
@@1pcfred But the knowledge was not lost cause Faethonians and late Martians come to Earth after destroyng Mars 10 000 year later. All humans are in reality original Martians.
I'm hoping the increasing power of computers and AI with simulations like the one mentioned at the end help us narrow this down a bit quicker, hopefully we see some new news within the next few decades!
I can just imagine future generations riding the goblin as some kind of slow, pain full ride to the nearest star.
I can't help but think there is some merit in the Titus-Bode Law... I am not a believer in coincidence.
Same
The problem is even if it is correct it assumes the planets still are in the positions where they were formed. We don't know if they are, we mostly see planets like Jupiter close to the sun in other systems but we don't know if they form there and ours have wandered or if the others have done so, or even if they can form in different places.
You are right that we can't exactly say it is wrong, all the planets are not exactly where the model suggest they should be but in the general area and they could have moved since. But to actually make a revised version of the model we need to be able to study many different systems with all their planets, old Titus did not have enough information to make a 100% correct model at the time, but his idea isn't stupid. There must be some kind of rules for how solar systems forms, it might be different for each type of sun too which explains why the Trappist system is so odd.
I would guess that we might revisit the idea some years from now when we have more to work with, if we look at other similarly large stars systems we might be able to make something more exact and figure out more about our own system at the same time.
@@loke6664 Some kind of modified mathematical model.
@@kaslo1462 Yeah, I don't think the idea that planets forms a certain distance from eachother is wrong. When a gas cloud turns into a system with gravity, there must be certain rules and if we get enough information, we can use that to make a new model.
When Titus formed the original one he had 6 planets to go on and a 7th that doesn't actually exist. He also didn't know the exact correct distances so of course his calculations are wrong.
And you have exceptions like being too near Jupiter might stop the forming of a planet but any theory have exceptions.
The idea that you can mathematically make a formula though, I think is correct.
@@loke6664 The idea is being revisited even now. I'll stick to the logic of an exploding planetary body between Mars and Jupiter. At least the asteroid belt(s) exists, while there is zero proof of sycretion disks. Just a conjecture to explain planetary formation of which theoretical astrophysicists and astronomers (that's why they call it theoretical) actually know nothing of.
Speculation doesn't belong here. We could also that Saturn and Jupiter had danced between one another and whatever remained as the asteroid belt was the result. It could have been two moons that collided one from Saturn and one from Jupiter. As it has been speculated Saturn and Jupiter switch places... but we were not there and we have never taken samples of the asteroids in the asteroid belt...so we should consider more than one theory here...
Maybe we were first on Phaeton. We blew it up. We moved to the next planet and blew it up. We moved to Mars and blew it up. Then we moved to earth.
We find in the Sumerian texts, that Uranus and Neptune are both described. Blue green giants are how they are described.
We don't find such things in their texts.
Having found a new one ?
When you were studying the texts, of course you learned to read cuneiform, you noticed of the 30,000 tablets so far found that they mention a wide variety of subjects. The tablets that talk about the Blue Green giants also references what we today call Mars and Venus @@guruware8612
@@guruware8612everyone claims to know the sumerian texts but never read them... it's ODD. I still dont know why people think the asteroid belt is Tiamat when the sumerian texts clearly state it is not. Marduk kills *Tiamat* and her body becomes the *Earth* it's very clear. Other legends say that "Phaeton, Marduk, or Maldek" are the asteroid belt.... none of them say Tiamat is the asteroid belt so idk where the confusion about these stories comes from.
Wait a minute... This "Goblin planet" was found in 2015, "three years ago"? So this video isn't a few months old; it's actually from 2018! Is the "goblin planet" actually Eris?
Eris was discovered in 2005 so you are still 10 years off.
** NOTE: The asteroid belt is a planet that never fully formed.
This was due because of thermal convection conveyance, whilst the inner planets formed from thermal conduction conveyance, & the outer planets formed due to thermal radiation conveyance.
Per as the asteroid belt is in between the rocky inner planets & the outer gaseous planets.
~ Another factor involved in the failed to form planet is the gravitational pull of the Sun & planet Jupiter.
Lastly, the asteroid belt's location coincides with the chemical properties between the Actinides & the Lanthanides. With their properties also in direct relation to their thermal convection conveyance properties.
~ The asteroid Ceres met minimal dwarf planet status requirements in 2006.
~ Also, an interesting fact is that when the sun finally dies in 8+ billion years, it will emit radiation that will power the next solar system, within our solar system, when our dying sun emits enough radiation from the point where the asteroid belt is now located, towards Jupiter, which will ignite Jupiter into the next sun of a solar system, with it's now orbiting satellites becoming planets.
Thank for your insightful comment.
Our solar system has been routinely visited by other stars passing close to or within our Ort cloud. Shulz"s star is an example. It's probably a safe bet to expect all stars to have an ort cloud. Stars don't have to collide, but what about their ort clouds? When that happens, expect things to go flying in every direction, inward, outward, and an exchange of comets and asteroids and even planets. Don't expect these objects to orbit in the same plane as the native objects.
That's true but the orbits of distant bodies align in a way that would if there was a planet 9, in the absence of planet 9 the orbits would be randomly scattered.
@AlanRangel5 They would, if they had time to do so and settle into orbits. And we haven't even considered rogue planets causing this before they went bye-bye. Nor has the material from other passing stars being transferred to our solar system been studied. For all we know right now, Bigfoot is doing this. Look for the rogues.
All stars originate in clusters, formed from contracting nebulae.
From there, stars migrate away until the cluster is dissipated. So, while stars may have close encounters with each other, early on, there isn't a lot of close encounters that have been observed by astronomers.
The planets in our solar system have essentially been in the same orbits for 4.5 billion years, undisturbed by passing stars. Any close encounter in that time would have disrupted the orbits beyond recognition.
Since I was a young man in the late 70's, I've thought that there used to be a planet where the Asteroid Belt is. When the planet was destroyed, it formed the Asteroid Belt. This is the first time I've heard someone else mention this theory.
The problem with that theory is that there’s an extremely small amount of material in the asteroid belt, not even enough to make a 10th of our moon. Certainly not enough to compose a planet.
But the matter that's contained in the asteroid belt is not all of the material that would come from a mega-earth exploding. An explosion of such a planet would result in material being flung throughout the solar system. It would also include the Oort Cloud, the Kuiper Belt objects, all asteroids, and comets orbiting the Sun. It might even include most of the moons orbiting the planets within our solar system. This might also be the origin of the earth's moon. Now, is this enough material?@@Cursalock
There is no scientific theory that states the asteroid belt CANT be the remains of a destroyed planet. Only that the remains of such a planet appear to not be all contained in that one orbit around the sun.
Also, the amount of material believed to be in the asteroid belt is merely an estimation based on observations.
What is the most likely and obvious answer to what is the asteroid belt? What is the most likely thing to be found orbiting the Sun that could produce a debris field of that size? There are no "Moons" that orbit the Sun. ...
@@ldfox11 Well said! You said that this is the first time you ever heard anyone mention the "asteroid belt came from a destroyed planet" theory, correct?
Well, if you haven't already, I recommend that you read "The Earth Chronicles," by Zecharia Sitchin. This is a scholarly 7-volume discussion about this and many other fascinating aspects of the ancient history of our solar system, and if Earth itself.
Enjoy!
@@ldfox11 Not the earth's moon, no. I have no problem with your other ideas though.
This video was on my recommended tab and it picked my interest so i started to watch and this was amazing if you turn your brain off and decide that you are watching an alternate universe.
🤣
Yes, "Insane Curiosity" is an apt name.
I'm fairly certain you have zero curiosity.
@@jamesjellis What are you talking about? It was a great video
@@Dreamerlok I never claimed it wasn't. YOU are the one claiming it was from an alternate reality which is BS.
You should make a video showing all of the dwarf planets
12 Planets Hes counting the Offical dwarf planets
Dwarf planets are still planets in the same fashion that dwarf stars are still stars.
They are both still celestial objects categorized as planets or stars so should still be listed in the Solar System as PLANETS, no matter how small.
@@prodigalpriest They are categorized as asteroids.
The idea "Maybe we mistook a missing planet for a faraway star" is impossible. Stars emit light, but planets do not, they may reflect light, but they may not
Ceres is 25% the mass of the asteroid belt, is round, is geologically active and could hold more than 10,000 cities
Planet of the crossing. Nubru one of its moons hit the planet in between Mars and Jupiter. The planet was called teeamot
It's Tiamat
As a former Godzilla fan, let’s hope we don’t find any aliens on a planet between mars and Jupiter
There was intelligent life on the planet. It resembled what China is today. After the planet was destroyed, some of its people became humans on Earth, but others became Bigfoots and Sasquatches.
"Oh no, there goes Tokyo......"
Former? I'm sorry for your loss
What if the Titus-Bode law was predicting where the planet would be, if the asteroid belt had successfully formed a planet during the formation of the solar system
It also could have been destroyed into the asteroid belt. Ceres still has ice attached to it and many less impacts than Vesta making Vesta look older.
That was exactly what i thought also but Jupiter most likely kept disrupting the creation with it's gravity.
Jupiters gravitational pull would prevent a formation of proper planets during the formations especially if it's not a gas planet
This video never mentioned the planetary migration of Jupiter, its postulated that none of the planets now reside in the orbit in which they were originally formed.
The Titus-Bode law would still be incorrect because Neptune was not where it predicted. Jupiter doesn't line up correctly either.
Goblin of Uranus??? Many strange things on Planet IX.
What I think is that as long as we keep working at it and looking, we will answer these questions one day and one day soon if technological advancement pace has shown.
Phalous ( JUST TO REMEMBER ) vulcan planet9 ( hypothetical) planet x. Planet 10. Planet 12. Planet 13. Planet 29. Planet 14. Planet 15.
It was called Marduk and yes, it was destroyed.
Phaeton, I believe is actually Tiamat. Genesis describes Niberu colliding with Tiamat. The asteroid belt was formed and the core of Tiamat, the watery giant, was shoved into orbit with the Moon, Kingu, which became the earths satellite. So there was another planet which isn't there now, only an asteroid belt. The planet is now the earth and shares it's orbit with Kingu, who was denied it's tablet if destiny, aka orbit. It's explained in the writings of Zechariah Sitchen.
11:28 aren't there models that show it's possible jupiter could've formed closer to sun and moved to its current orbit, rearranging other planets in the process and possibly causing destruction of a planet that formed the asteroid belt?
There are some models that show that’s exactly what happened. I’m not sure what level of confidence astronomers have in that being correct, merely that it’s possible. As an aside it also offers a possible solution to why we’ve found so many “hot jupiters”orbiting other stars at insanely close distances.
@@clayfoster8234 - now that you remind me with mention of hot Jupiters, it's basically made up of the same stuff as the sun.
Jupiter is 90% hydrogen. That's the same thing the sun burns as fuel in its fusion reaction to create byproduct helium "ash".
So, the key ingredient of Jupiter was clumping up at the center of the solar system.
To bad we can't just send a science ship out to observe stellar nurseries to see how various stars and near star gas giants are formed!
According to Immanuel Velikovsky, Venus was in a different orbit, bounced off Mars ( Paul McCartney sang about it ) and careered into our other Moon sending it on a long trip up Uranus after smacking into the fifth planet Mahdickus destroying it. Earth became a shooting gallery resulting in the annihilation of the dinosaurs, but not before the Pakleds packed up their belongings and took off for the stars.
It can be a rogue planet that was caught by our Sun's gravity which is large enough to make difference in gravity around Senda and other frozen small icy moons
Many things about the Solar System can be learned by researching the writings of ancient cultures around the world, including Sumerian. Also Emanuel Velikovsky has written extensively on the subject.
We've known about "Planet 9" for nearly 100 years.
It's name is, "Pluto".
It's name is Europa, and we've known about it for 500 years.
1. Mercury
2. Venus
3. Earth
4. Moon
5. Mars
6. Ceres
7. Jupiter
8. Io
9. Europa
What part of the orbit of Pluto cause Pluto actually comes to the inner solar system at its closest path by the sun?
"Giuseppe's joy of Piazzi" what is supposed to mean? Shouldn't have been "Giuseppe Piazzi's joy"? (5:51)
Planet between Mar AND Jupiter had been destroyed to become astroid belt.
Please look up how to pronounce names. It's not 'Ty-chee'.
How is the metallic asteroid named Pisces, explained? How would a large metallic object be forged?
Zecharia Sitchin suggested that the goddess known to the Sumerians as Tiamat in fact relates to a planet that was destroyed by a rogue planet known as Nibiru, creating both Earth and the asteroid belt
Correct! I'm a huge fan of the late Zecharia Sitchin, and have read several of his many fine works.
What you mentioned in your comments is true, according to Sitchin, who studied numerous translations of extremely ancient Sumerian and Akkadian tablets, and later, several texts from ancient Egypt and Babylon, as well.
One point I'd like to add here is that Nibiru is also the home planet of the so-called Annunaki, an alien race millions of years older (and incredibly more technologically advanced) than humans. According to Sitchin's works, these beings came to Earth several hundred thousand years ago, and among other spectacular feats, altered the genetic code of lower primates to essentially "create" humans!
Thanks for your excellent comment! I would appreciate your thoughts (and fact-checking! 😉 ) of what I've added. Thanks!
What is there so many names for that planet that use to be inbetween Mars & Jupiter?
The most common name I heard is Meldeck
Maldek, Phaeton, Marduk.
Earth Tiamat, Terra.
@@mcmaldek ehh! Like yer
Vulcan,Mercury,Venus,Earth,Mars,Phaeton,Jupiter,Saturn,Uranus,Neptune,541132 Lelēakūhonua&Tyche
Started with a random rocky planet between Mars and Jupiter ended with Planet X💀
Do you feel bAd for the planets in the solar sistum before
2:21 remember that when they say this star this far this big around go planet this size this orbit and THERE WATER.
cant even find planet own solar system that are BIGGER bcoz they closer
How ironic would it be that the asteroid belt could have been a habitable planet started human life on earth.
If Vulcan does not exist, then where does Mr. Spock come from?
Vulcan is like Elm St. There's one in every town. So Spock just comes from a different planet Vulcan.
Ceres coudl have been the 5th plaet
Insane Curiosity, good video, well thought out. However, when you got out toward possibilities past Pluto, several made me turn my head when they were pronounced. Two of the 3 were pronounced differently than you did, and Wikipedia agreed with me. They were Tyche (rather than rhyming with the exercise method, they had it as TIE-key), and Ceres as 'series'.
Just from the thumbnail I'm guessing this is about Ceres.
Planet 9 could be the 5th gas giant that got launched out of orbit billions of years ago
Realy I like this video so so much like you can imagine
at 5;48 why are so many of the craters hexagonal
5:48
A distant planet in our own solar system would be harder to detect than an exoplanet, because you can find exoplanets by watching for them to transit past their star, wheras a distant planet in our own solar system would be very dark and hard to find.
Great point. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Both Phaeton 9:43 and that hypothetical planet 1:37 with the 70-million-year orbital period (that lies on the outskirts of the Solar System) seem to have land masses very similar in appearance to the land masses of Earth
bro, we could find and take nice pictures of other galaxies, btu couldnt find a planet at the edge of our solar system
9?
What if? Is it all just imagination? Time marches on!
so is it 8 or 9 planets?!
Yes.
Vulcan,Pheaton,541132 Leleākūhonua (The Goblin)&Tyche
I love learning about anything that has to do with astronomy. I'll be 49 years old soon and I have never, ever heard about this before. Is this some sort of new Mandela effect? Did it just get that little coverage? Why have I never heard about this until now?
A lot of this news is very new and sadly not a lot of people are as enthusiastic about astronomy like we are.
I've heard about the theory before, and it was the basis for a classic Doctor Who story
This video isn't new, it's internally dated from 2018. The "goblin planet" is probably Eris, and there are many others like it. @@StrangeHappening-iu4fu
@@SamuelBlack84
Doctor Who ....
😅 was on a Inhabited Planet called Nargith,/Nagarith
I figured everyone just assumed the asteroid belt was an old planet.
Script writers apparently don’t proof read their work anymore either. We are doomed.
Thank you for giving Pluto its proper place. Sort of.
Many star systems are binary and trinary. There is also a theory of a brown dwarf (a failed star) in a very large orbit. This star does not radiate light but has immense gravity and magnetism. Theory is as it closes in in the sun the gravity interactions are asteroids being dislodged, the sun coronal ejections increase, and may have caused Uranus to flip sideways.
Brown dwarves don't emit visible light, but they do emit infrared light, which has not been discovered from the outer solar system.
The fifth planet used to be where earth is, but was called something else at that time. One of our existing planets within our solar system, was a roge planet and it hit the planet ki. ( now called earth) this collision created the astroid belt, as our planet earth used to be much bigger than it is today. The remains of the planet ki was pushed to where earth is today. The planet that hit our earth may have been Mars, as it is highly scarred. The water from the original planet recollest onto ki. That is why our planet earth was covered by so much water for millions of years. Eventual water evaporation into space removed much of the water over the span of millions of years. The Annunaki discovered the planet and called it ki. The Annunaki come from another roge planet that has a celestrial orbit of 36000 years around our sun, and is on its way back to the sun currently. Almost no light from our sun hits that planet currently, but in about 800-900 years ftom now, it will be closer and telescopes will be able to see it then.
The amount of material in the Asteroid belt is significant, but it's not exactly like pictures portray. Let me explain...
The asteroids are actually spaced apart significantly and few really do interact. Vesta is a large asteroid, or possibly a minor planet that failed to garner enough material to form. Ceres is the same. However, there is NOT enough material, even if you combine Vesta, Ceres, and even the captured asteroids Phobos and Deimos that are orbiting Mars to make a significantly sized planet near the size of Mars. You might get a minor planet the size of Ganymede or Pluto, but not enough to match Mars on the same scale.
The Asteroid belt was just debris. Some formed small planetoids like Vesta and Ceres but many asteroids are hundreds to thousands of kilometers apart and few have enough mass to do much against the other.
Some planet like Venus, Earth or Mars have exchanged orbits. So now we have planet betwen Mars and Jupiter, its Mars, Earth or Venus itself.... Theres should be two planet so close each one as are Earth and Mars 1-1,52 AU, cause after Venus 0,72 AU. Earth should be at 1,4 AU and Mars should be on 2,8 AU where is now asteroid field....
6:49 "Some astronomers were agitated, the objects were too small to be planets."
Apparently Neil deGrasse Tyson is a time traveling wet blanket.
why not make a spacecraft that travels inside the asteroid belt and locate the unknown planets there. doing fly by's of those objects
It was a water planet called tiamat by the annunaki.
I know that planet from the astroid belt called ceres
pluto is the ninth planet.
YES
YES
😄
Dwarf or not it was the ninth planet discovered. 👍
I have heard this fifth planet also called Rahab.
The middle of Jupiter and mars is ceres vesta Pallas Hygeia
Why do the astronomers think planet nine is in a slow orbit? What if it is a fast orbit? Maybe extremely fast so it cannot be caught by a slow telescope.
Until we get up there and call them home we will never really know.
0:18 you mean 8
Sedna waiting on the outskirts
Can we see Ceres through the telescope?
According to Sumerian clay tablets written in Cuneiform script the planet was called Trimat.
A moon of the planet Nibiru struck it causing it to change its orbit, we now call it Earth.
Debris that was knocked off Trimat, formed the asteroid belt.
Nope ... niburi is fiction..
The Planet is the planet Nagarith, Home of the Serpent ppl, almost 3times Earth size...
Because of its extremely low, Magnetic an Gravitational attraction
(3 times less than earth)
it's at the Mercy of every Galaxy it passes through, an is punted from Galaxy to Galaxy, exactly the same fate as our moon, until it arrived in our Solar System app' 14k ya, it has no control over its wanderings what so ever .. because of that it's arrival in our Solar System fluctuates, its orbit brings it to our parameters every, 3400/3700k yrs...
That sounds like Zechariah Sitchin, i never read his stories.. i know it's not the sumerian tablets because I read them... the Sumerian tablets clearly state that Tiamat is Earth...
Did Sitchin say that the Asteroid belt is Tiamat, is that why so many peiple are confused?
The Asteroid belt that came from a planet is known as Phaeton, Maldek... or Marduk. Now... what the Sumerians were likely referencing... if they knew what actually happened was what we call the Theia hypothesis... Theia would be Marduk's arrow that split Tiamat, made THE EARTH and "the heavens" likely a reference to the moon. The Sumerian texts refer to Tiamats Body as the earth 🌎... just look up Marduk and Tiamat all the translations say the same thing, Tiamat is earth... why would they write a creation story about an uncreated planet anyway?
I believe Ceres is a dwarf planet. It is spherical but has not cleared its orbital path. Much like Pluto
I believe there is a large dim star out there past the Oort Cloud there is difficult for us to see there is a lot of bodies that pull outward, and then back in imagine two stars, circling, one another like a cosmic dance, spinning around a central point with their own planets, but also with planets that orbit, both we know enough about our universe and galaxy to say it’s one way or the other theory is just that theory it’s not provable yet and it’s not admissible yet let your imagination run rampant that is how the best theories are formed
Look up Zecharia Sichins translation of the Sumarian Tablets. It speaks of a planet between Mars and Jupiter. After a collision with another distance orbiting planets moon the asteroid belt and Earth came from this planet.
Sitchin didn't translate... he embellished.
When i saw the video i already knew it was Ceres because its the only dwarf planet there
Somebody should tell all those bits to pull themselves together.
NINE planets today??? Oooh
There is not enough material between Mars and Jupiter for another planet
By "planet nine" do you mean planet X? (Did they change the name when they de-planeted Pluto?)
Yes, they did.
" Of the other sex" 💀
This is probably a dumb comment… But I just don't understand how we can pick up chemicals on planets and different solar systems and we don't have the technology to determine if there is a ninth planet? Somebody please explain.
Detecting chemicals on distant planets uses spectrometry, which analyzes light to determine composition. Finding a ninth planet is harder because it doesn't emit light. We rely on indirect methods like observing gravitational effects or using powerful telescopes.
Hypothetically, if every massive body in the asteroid belt coalesced into a single celestial body it would only be half the size of our moon. So it's kind of hard to reputably claim that there is a possible planet there. Not to mention that the gravitational effect of Jupiter on the asteroid belt pretty much ensures the individual asteroids will almost certainly never combine into a single planet, even if they once were a planet. Assuming they were once a planet, most likely most of that planet's mass would've been ejected from the orbital area that makes up the asteroid belt when the collision that destroyed the hypothetical planet occurred.
But you took wrong acusation that after destoying planet all the mass keppt is on asteroid field, what is incorect cause after explosion 90% of the mass escaped his orbital, some parts went to Sun some are comet now and some changed his orbital, Moon can be original Moon of Faethon.... Even Mars and Earth can be originaly originated from Asteroid field....
Earth is from an original asteroid belt.... Phaeton came from 2 asteroid belts but now it's one
I'm sorry, but I still really hate hearing it referred to by the number 9. First of all, the, X, referred to it's mysterious nature..not that it's originally believed to be the 10th planet. Second, because it is the standard reference for an unknown element in in the scientific field.
You see how science evolves over time? When I was a kid they were positive there wasn't enough material in the asteroid belt to make a full planet.
There isn't enough to make a planet; the asteroid belt is only about 1% the mass of the earth. Mars is only 10% the mass of the earth. Jupiter swallowed the other 89% up.
@@cbuzz2371
that's what NASA told you.
to convince you planets arent Hollow, the debri of the Asteroid belt would make a Planet 3times the moon's size.
Ever seen a video of somebody shooting a watermelon? The scraps fly in every direction. Very little of the original planet would have been captured in a stable orbit. Look for the rest among the stars.
@21:00 here's a thought, some scientific opinion suggests that our sun has a twin, as most systems appear to be binary, so do we have a rare binary system made up of two solar systems? An anchor star at each end, some planets orbiting each star, and a small handful of shared planets orbiting both stars, which accounts for the highly elliptical orbits of the outer planets, as well as the perihelic orbits of all other planets.
I was just thinking the same thing but it not being a live star like our but instead a brown darf which are failed stars that are bigger than Jupiter but yet smaller than the sun. I'm thinking that it maybe a failed red darf that didn't complete the stages of fusion!
@@kelvinhooks9399 going by another video that I've recently seen, it need to be active, and producing or emitting solar electricity to have enough gravitational pull
@kingofthejungle3833 Jupiter is our second "Sun" that didn't ignite.
@@Necorum nah that was investigated and written off, a heap of scientific reasons why it couldn't have been a failed star
@@Necorum Jupiter not big enough to be a brown darf, it didn't gain enough material.
Great video and information !
If science is still learning then what good did it do to test me in school on these things you don't know for sure about because you keep changing your minds? Good thing they taught me Pluto was a planet, it made huge difference in my life and I couldn't have been successful without it.