Diablo Immortal Alpha Gameplay Review - First Impressions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ย. 2024
  • After months with no Diablo Immortal news or update, we revisit and review the game after the Blizzcon 2018 announcement reaction. I got early access to an alpha build and compare Diablo Immortal vs. Diablo 3. Barbarian gameplay shown. We also talk about the story and lore of Immortal.
    No release date or launch date yet. No update on Diablo Immortal on PC.
    ▬ Subscribe for more videos ►bit.ly/RhykkerSub
    ▬ Follow me on Twitch to join me when I play: ►bit.ly/1v5gqDu
    ▬ Patreon rewards: / rhykker
    ▬ Follow me on Twitter for updates: ► / rhykker
    ▬ Visit my website: ► www.rhykker.com/
    Executive producers: Jim Udune, spudboy999, Paradigm400, Kiskaloo, MohEternal, Monito
    Special thanks: Matthew Feiteira, moniker, russiandood, Joshua Dotson, maianashira, Maurice Lepenat, Joshua Ralph, Brian Grygla, Recramorcen, Remiehneppo, Neme5i5, TepidTurtle, Lamer of Sweden, SmokinWookie, Telionis, MONGAS INC., Terry Lee, Zaeith, Zeldraga, Valentine Judnich, Tony Duran
    #DiabloImmortal #Diablo #Blizzard

ความคิดเห็น • 2.1K

  • @z3ro-ironman749
    @z3ro-ironman749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +612

    Hey Rhykker this is folks

    • @indrathelonewarriors1677
      @indrathelonewarriors1677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This comment is the best lul 🤣🤣

    • @TheLockville
      @TheLockville 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Never gets old.

    • @sdubs
      @sdubs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i just chuckled

    • @ElJAsok
      @ElJAsok 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Down voting because its immortal. "Bleep" you rhykker, you know better.

  • @Barksii
    @Barksii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    Immortals seems like it would be a really great game on the Switch

    • @darkestccino5405
      @darkestccino5405 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Honestly, you're right.
      Fallout Shelter was a mobile game before it was a Switch game, so maybe the same could happen here.

    • @azyrael96
      @azyrael96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Isn't d3 on switch as well? Dunno how good/bad that is though

    • @segfault_000
      @segfault_000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@azyrael96 it's pretty good.

    • @guitaraholic
      @guitaraholic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I’m hoping blizcon will announce this tbh ... would make so much sense plus literal touchscreen controls map perfectly

    • @LordBriareos
      @LordBriareos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yeah. A Switch release would definitely be good for Immortals. Would probably have gone over better if they made it a Switch game first and then moved it over to Android/Iphone after. Even if the PC players still gave it shit a handheld console game would've been far more of a palatable middle ground than jumping right to phone.

  • @jerichiyo
    @jerichiyo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I've waited 2 years for this, and now my device isn't compatible anymore lol

  • @ethantee764
    @ethantee764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    So will I have to watch a 30 second ad every time I use leap?

    • @jayr5mitty351
      @jayr5mitty351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @rowlandbuck2703
      @rowlandbuck2703 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I’m willing to bet that identifying legendaries will take a long time, and that you can pay to make it instant. That’s what most mobile hack n slash do already.

    • @tranquility6789
      @tranquility6789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow never heard this joke before

  • @offsdexter2
    @offsdexter2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    they seem to have changed to a more dark atmosphere to get positive reactions

  • @justinu4521
    @justinu4521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +213

    I always said that if they announced this with the D4 announcement it would have gotten a great welcome

    • @p0ma147
      @p0ma147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I wouldn't say that. It just would not have pulled that many punches as it did. But a "great welcome"? - Doubt.

    • @dofydudes1735
      @dofydudes1735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Yeah, they screwed up in 2018, Blizz should have taken the lesson from Bethesda. They announced TES VI first (almost just a title drop) then announced TES Blade for mobile, and nobody mind it and it almost got no backlash like Diablo Immortal.

    • @harbhub
      @harbhub 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Not necessarily. People would have argued A) it's another company being subcontracted to make the game rather than an in-house Blizzard game B) it's a mobile game, but the core audience of Blizzard is on PC C) Resources are being allocated for Immortal that could have been used to make Diablo 4 even better.

    • @winterwatch8500
      @winterwatch8500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@p0ma147 That's not what pulled punches means.

    • @Nokamigg
      @Nokamigg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@harbhub C: More Resources do not mean a better game. Cyberpunk is a recent example of that. Their management even said that bringing in more people would not have made the game any better for release. B: With Hearthstone on the market the audiance for blizzard games is also on mobile. It's entitled to think that they should only look at PC. A: Everything looks like diablo 3 pretty much so outsourcing something is not neccesarily bad. Many assets on other blizzard games are not made in-house either, outsourcing is very much industry standard for many things.

  • @j97n75
    @j97n75 3 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    Wow my brain completely refused to read "immortal" when I went to click on the video

    • @TheCooderix
      @TheCooderix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Probably braindead.

    • @xandermancer
      @xandermancer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      same here, I was thinking Diablo 4 alpha. I was gonna ... well, let's say... "get retarded"

    • @DarkWanderer666
      @DarkWanderer666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So why you here

    • @banishedbr
      @banishedbr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DarkWanderer666 cuz we still in shock with bli$$

    • @TheCooderix
      @TheCooderix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@banishedbr They're a company. Making Diablo for the mobile not only makes perfect sense, but man is it smart. Yet we somehow forgive companies like GGG when they make Path of Exile for mobile, because they promise "It will be good!"
      Srsly, people need to chill their literal tits. We're talking about video games here. If you don't like it, it's as simple as just not playing it.

  • @jabetaguiluz7322
    @jabetaguiluz7322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +191

    Am I the only one that feels that they coulda add a lot of these features into D3 with relative easy, making their PC fans happier?

    • @Xynth22
      @Xynth22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      But then they couldn't milk the mobile market.

    • @libor2010
      @libor2010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      they do not care about PC players

    • @christiangourley3873
      @christiangourley3873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I know the mobile gaming market is huge but is it not casual gaming? Why produce an MMO that can only be played on a phone..seems very short sighted to ignore the console and PC market entirely. By all means develop a game for mobiles but an MMO? MMO's require hours of play to enjoy and grind for resources etc so Phones will heat up and will require to be plugged into the mains to keep it charged. Maybe I'm missing something here lol

    • @klingon9292
      @klingon9292 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      What sense does upgrading a game being replaced make?

    • @salesshot101
      @salesshot101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is not "relative easy"

  • @visoroverwatch3247
    @visoroverwatch3247 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Ill play this, i got a phone, sometimes i need to play a game laying down to help me fall asleep. PC games make you wake up lol.

    • @pursutioms
      @pursutioms 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Toilets friend, a quick rift/poop is game changing

    • @Kgregory18
      @Kgregory18 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats what d3 on switch is for!

    • @avitus3990
      @avitus3990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      what exciting about this is lots of my friends / family members who dont have a pc will play this game with me. No matter how may good PC games i have, playing with someone is always more fun for me

    • @bombomos
      @bombomos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Led screens make you wake up. The only reason you might get sleepy while on your phone is if you are holding it below eye lever were the light doesn't register in the part of your eye that recognizes light so that you stay awake. Honestly, not a healthy habit to have

    • @Draethar
      @Draethar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bombomos Apparently the game has a blue light filter you can enable.

  • @GamerDad720
    @GamerDad720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thanks for reporting in, definitely not interested in the upgrade system, battle pass, micro transactions pay 2 win portions. I was hoping for a good mobile game, but I’m out. Will stick with PD2 for now.

    • @heroicgoo915
      @heroicgoo915 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      nope, i give up. PD2, whats that? PayDay 2? no idea here tbh :(

    • @GamerDad720
      @GamerDad720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@heroicgoo915 Project Diablo 2, a popular mod that was just released a few months ago for Diablo II. Nice balance and quality of life changes.

    • @heroicgoo915
      @heroicgoo915 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GamerDad720 - thnks for reply.

    • @xjohnny1000
      @xjohnny1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Curious what you would pay for a good mobile game.

    • @GamerDad720
      @GamerDad720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xjohnny1000 same price as a desktop game, 20-50$

  • @Deusaga
    @Deusaga 3 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Dark Wood isn't where the Countess is. She's in Black Marsh. Who's this 'her' he speaks of that is meant to be in Dark Wood?

    • @Rhykker
      @Rhykker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +167

      Whoops

    • @CrushingPeanuts
      @CrushingPeanuts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Blood Raven?

    • @Riotlight
      @Riotlight 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      Treehead Woodfist instantly came to my mind when he said dark wood. Not sure if male or female tho!!

    • @Sivxgamer
      @Sivxgamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      #itscomplicated

    • @WheelchairXL
      @WheelchairXL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Riotlight Respect.

  • @DrunkenSano
    @DrunkenSano 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Thank you for the first impression!

  • @fragehardt
    @fragehardt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I'm trying my best to keep an open mind for Immortals. Over time I've actually allowed myself to be kind of excited for it. At the very least, as you said, we'll get more lore. At best, it could be fun if I go in with the right attitude.

    • @krectus
      @krectus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      well at the VERY least it is free.

    • @bromora989
      @bromora989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Having seen how League’s Wild Rift mobile game is, I am cautiously optimistic for Immortal. Rhykker said it improved on D3 in a lot of ways, and I actually enjoyed D3 for a good while.
      I think the monetisation scheme will be what makes or breaks the game for me, since Wild Rift is extremely F2P friendly like other Riot games, and it manages to transfer the League gameplay into the mobile medium into a pretty satisfying way: I have my criticisms, but there’s less of them than joys felt.
      If Diablo Immortal -despite Blizzard’s recent track record for prices- is friendly enough to F2P players, I will enjoy it.

    • @MAarshall
      @MAarshall 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bromora989 It's hard to not improve on D3 lol.

    • @bromora989
      @bromora989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MAarshall well as I said, I actually enjoyed D3 for a good while, whilst I certainly had bits I disliked, I really don’t think it was a bad game (at least not after Reaper of Souls), just not really how people knew Diablo to be: and that’s what people disliked about it.

    • @banishedbr
      @banishedbr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      what good lore you can have when the core creators are not even there lol

  • @futavadumnezo
    @futavadumnezo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I have only one question though: why not make It multi-platform like Genshin Impact?
    They proved a mobile game can be and work perfectly fine as a multi-platform.
    So , why not?

    • @saitamama2927
      @saitamama2927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because Diablo 4, Genshin Impact is a new franchise

    • @LtksK
      @LtksK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'd say "perfectly fine" is a slight overstatement. The whole resin mechanic doesn't translate that well on pc.

    • @helloworld6160
      @helloworld6160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just use bluestacks...

    • @johant73
      @johant73 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@helloworld6160 i dont think bluestack good to emulate those press and point gesture.

    • @jzisser9
      @jzisser9 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johant73 you can bind keys on your keyboard to press specific areas of the screen, so you could bind keys for the different skills.

  • @ricksmith7063
    @ricksmith7063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent review. Detailed coverage of game systems without overly promoting or hating on it. Well done!

  • @deadkodo
    @deadkodo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have a question. How many people play Diablo for the lore?

  • @FPSSilence
    @FPSSilence 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I liked the weapon damage and the numbers... not 3217892319213828% like D3.

  • @KillrobPlays
    @KillrobPlays 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Excellent overview! Thanks for that. Certainly not for me, but would be a bad move to not keep an eye on this and its approach to solving various design problems. Seems competent at what it does for sure! Cheers

    • @zebedeesummers4413
      @zebedeesummers4413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I was honestly considering playing it till I heard the monetization... Classic mobile for me, so much good but with a strong gotcha!

    • @rendelldraw
      @rendelldraw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zebedeesummers4413 So far it seems the only things that are behind the pay wall are chances to increase rewards -- all the content is still free to access.

    • @zebedeesummers4413
      @zebedeesummers4413 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rendelldraw increased rewards = increased power. I understand that the content is the same but with lessor gear it isn't. Especially with the breakpoints in efficiency. I get that this is better than the norm for the market but I'm not a fan regardless.

    • @zebedeesummers4413
      @zebedeesummers4413 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rendelldraw it is normal to hit limits that you need to change your character or grind a bit to surpass but the experience is greatly changed the moment people can skip said effort via real money.

    • @rendelldraw
      @rendelldraw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zebedeesummers4413 I understand how that feels...
      I remember my cousin spending almost all day, everyday playing D3 because he didn't have to work back then, so he ended up kinda having "increased power" compared to me who can only play during weekends.
      I couldn't help but feel a bit of bitterness about it and I remember kinda wishing that Blizzard also put a limit (decreasing drop rates if playtime reaches certain consecutive hours) to those who have the luxury of time just to be fair to those players with more common normal lives.

  • @ThatDjinn
    @ThatDjinn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I agree with most of your points. However:
    Pay to win: you pay money to get a win.
    Winning in HnS games is tied to getting items that let you progress farther into the game's difficulty.
    This "pay to progress" system gives you items, which in turn lets you progress farther into the game's diffuclty. Items you'd normally have to play and win consecutively to acquire.
    You pay money so that you don't have to win by yourself. It's pay to win.
    The necessity for completing battle pass tasks is just another system to make you return every day and train you to do so. To work the game into your daily schedule, so it stops being a game and becomes a habit.
    My real problem with these systems isn't the pay to win system in itself. It's the fact that over a few months of play you will pay for the game more than for a properly made and finished game like Diablo 3. That increased cost should translate into more regular new content with new dungeons, items, classes and story, but most mobile games don't release new content in a timely manner. The most you can expect is a very minor event or a couple of them every month and a big event every 3-4 months. And all those events are based off making you login daily to do your quests, not rewarding binge play once a week.
    I'd rather pay an upfront price for a game I can decide when and how to play myself, rather than be milked throughout the span of months or years. I still return to D3 every season and have fun. I won't be playing Immortal.

    • @joeyuanli2593
      @joeyuanli2593 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like a monetization method that pays upfront. They can still sell stuffs, but not power. This is selling power. A loot I need 10 hours to grind might take only 10 mjnutes if I pay 5 bucks. For diablo immortal, I will just play through storyline for free and then put it away.

  • @Ocean5ix
    @Ocean5ix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    If people end up liking this game it would be the most hilarious thing ever.

    • @kaydens6964
      @kaydens6964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I bet the dev team is like lets prove those idiots wrong, we are the professionals we know what we are doing.

    • @pvdg3515
      @pvdg3515 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kaydens6964 lmfao!!!! they did it to appease china

    • @Toopa88
      @Toopa88 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Reclusiarch Grimaldus If you are not capable of finding the good games, then it's your fault ;)
      There are plenty of free games as well as games that have upfront costs that are a lot of fun. You can even play games such as Baldurs Gate on your phone.

  • @fedord01
    @fedord01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    NGL. I had my reservations about this game, figured it be another run of the mill mobile ARPG which is flooded on the app store already. But this legit looks good. From the gameplay, the depth, the gameplay systems. Im actually impressed and now really looking forward to its release. Good job Blizz.

  • @Level84
    @Level84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Just here to drop a like on the video as I know a lot of Diablo fans are going to be disliking the video for no reason other than it's discussing Diablo Immortal. I'm in the same boat as all the other Diablo fans here, but don't shoot the messenger. This video provides great info, even if we don't agree with all of the choices Blizzard made.

    • @vansserafim
      @vansserafim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm a huge diablo fan and I'm very excited for this game. Stop claiming you are one when you dislike the game just cause of the platform

    • @snuffeldjuret
      @snuffeldjuret 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vansserafim Pretty much this. Not gonna spend a cent on it, but I'll play it at least once and prolly enjoy it a lot for that time.

    • @Level84
      @Level84 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vansserafim Where did I say I dislike the game as a whole? I said I don't agree with all the choices Blizzard made such as the monetization aspect. Did you even watch the video?

    • @arpgdad
      @arpgdad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am disliking it because it does not focus on the monetisation enough, which is a very important aspect of immortal.

  • @abefromen1
    @abefromen1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Diablo + MMO + portable? I’m hyped.
    The hate is literally unjustified at this point.

    • @_Aeolus_00
      @_Aeolus_00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lol ok

    • @adahepper2665
      @adahepper2665 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How time easy subvert the ones with a memory of a goldfish.

    • @jaccl4539
      @jaccl4539 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      your going to be looking real silly with they finally release the monetization for this game - but you do you

  • @HolyMolyJC
    @HolyMolyJC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have always been curious what his Real voice sounds like..

  • @Clout_207
    @Clout_207 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Immortal is free, so paying for a battle pass is basically buying the game. People will always complain just to bitch about something. This honestly looks good, and will no doubt crush the mobile gaming niche!

    • @leotravel85
      @leotravel85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It looks like shit

    • @Clout_207
      @Clout_207 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s better graphics, pvp, actual character customization and worth while grinding rewards... Everything d3 should of been. you are in denial about mobile games is all. Pc’s are a thing of the past

    • @leotravel85
      @leotravel85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Clout_207 PC's a thing of the past? Mobile games are for kids and casual gamers, is not and never will be an optimal platform for gaming. Real gamers use a PC.

  • @Haken00
    @Haken00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Boy am I glad Rhykker has phones.

    • @vansserafim
      @vansserafim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you clown

  • @Spookerboi
    @Spookerboi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    imagine a diablo that took place between diablo 2 and diablo 3, but it came out on pc :o

    • @beldin2987
      @beldin2987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Marvel Heroes was for me personally my "Diablo 2.5" 😉

    • @shanbannan17
      @shanbannan17 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ye i know right cant stand mobile games lol

    • @DarkWanderer666
      @DarkWanderer666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You make Immortal on pc then

    • @Spookerboi
      @Spookerboi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DarkWanderer666 could probably use a chromebook or even use the windows phone link app thingy to stream it onto a pc but it just wont be the same:( or maybe it will, i guess i'll judge it when i play it

    • @beldin2987
      @beldin2987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DarkWanderer666 The only thing thats annoying at the beginning, and often even after long time is that there is no right click.
      And else i mostly now play with controller in right hand for WASD movement and mouse just for all the other stuff. But i was already a bad "mouse clicker" for long years in MMOs.

  • @NickHafling3r
    @NickHafling3r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Pay to go faster always means they slowed down the game to a frustrating level. They can shove this where the sun never shines.

    • @Deffine
      @Deffine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sadly too many chinese people for them to lose on investing in this.

    • @Delimon007
      @Delimon007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This right here

    • @funnyanimalworld7579
      @funnyanimalworld7579 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some PC games slows their progression and adds payed ways to speed up.warframe

    • @Delimon007
      @Delimon007 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@funnyanimalworld7579
      yyuuppp, but warframe is at least free to play and after roughly 20 bucks you are good to go. If not for the devs being complete assholes it wouldn't have been that bad imo.

    • @FatalFist
      @FatalFist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd be okay if said boosts were awarded behind a 20sec or 30sec add so long as the ads aren't intrusive to the game like some mobile titles out there.

  • @onatgz
    @onatgz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    have you noticed that rhykker didn't "call us to action" to post comments? like "what to do you guys think about this and that..."
    makes you wonder...

    • @Rhykker
      @Rhykker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      There's nothing to wonder: any time I talk about Immortal, the comments are toxic. I'll "call to action" comments on Immortal once we can have a civilized discussion about it.

    • @BrandonWestfall
      @BrandonWestfall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Rhykker Everyone wants to ride the hate train instead of having an open mind. The same could be said for any controversial topic.
      In the end it’s a massive maturity issue.

  • @TReXcuRRy
    @TReXcuRRy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This game gonna be a success I think. Despite the few cranky boomers not letting go of the hate (but secretly eager to play it anyways)

    • @MillenniumEarl014
      @MillenniumEarl014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nah. Looks like a generic chinese cashgrab with BPs and shit lol. Oh look tap this red dot and you get this oh also tap this red dot and you auto path there, talk to this guy, you get this item, everyone gets the same item and everyone looks the same lmao.
      Also of course people will play it, it's free. I will try it myself but seeing this and some pictures of items I can already see how generic it is.

    • @Tyrfingr
      @Tyrfingr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks like a pile of shit. Honestly.

    • @leighsherval1023
      @leighsherval1023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It will do well.

  • @oasdfe1691
    @oasdfe1691 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Let's not bullcrap. The only reason they made this game is micro transactions. Unless there's a cracked version that disables the timers it's a no go

    • @futavadumnezo
      @futavadumnezo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They made it for the Chinese.
      Nothing more, nothing less.

    • @PineappleBaconPizza
      @PineappleBaconPizza 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm going to play this game on my phone when it comes out. Not going to buy any paid content. I'm going to try and enjoy it by playing just before going to bed at night 😅

    • @rendelldraw
      @rendelldraw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PineappleBaconPizza Same here. Should every Diablo game be solely about being the earliest to be the strongest player? And that the story, the lore and other gameplay elements are just padding?
      I'll play at my own pace and not compare my progress with other players (I've learned to do so in D3). This will be a fun way to dive back into the game's world.

  • @naystation1577
    @naystation1577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    ... when you suddenly realize that you ACTUALLY HAVE A PHONE

    • @Adam-082
      @Adam-082 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      yep and still won't play this micro transaction bullshit

    • @바보Queen
      @바보Queen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      wait a minute.. i do have a phone!

    • @DekkarJr
      @DekkarJr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Adam-082 yeah... and my phone sucks and I have sweaty ass hands :(

    • @ladistar
      @ladistar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Adam-082 damn LOL so true

  • @cshep578
    @cshep578 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was being close minded about immortal, but now I am excited. Diablo at work? Sold.

  • @mavster70
    @mavster70 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a Barbarian, do we have to stick to dual wielding? No 2hander?

    • @Rhykker
      @Rhykker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I only saw dual wielding

  • @patrickpeardon2018
    @patrickpeardon2018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    People should ignore this game like the plague. Don't reward Activision for betraying us.

    • @einz
      @einz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally agree, they had a chance and now after all their promises to community they just represent a FULL COPY of Raziel 🤷

  • @MarkusAkaMasse
    @MarkusAkaMasse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Cant they just start a ranking which also reveals how much $$$ the person spent on the buy-options of the game... so people playing free could compete

    • @chuckofthenorth4513
      @chuckofthenorth4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      People playing free doesn’t help their business and goes against the business model. Don’t be a freeloader, support companies that make you happy

  • @plac1197
    @plac1197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Diablo Immortal is Pay to Win. Won't be playing it.
    Had it only had cosmetics, mounts, etc. I'd be fine with that. Anything that speeds up progression in what is intrinsically a grinding game... means it is Pay to Win and is garbage.

    • @michaelwatterson600
      @michaelwatterson600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      In a game which has co-op elements but no PvP how can you use the term pay to win, you're not competing against each other so where is the "win" aspect... just grind longer and play f2p (grinding is half the fun anyway in Diablo) honestly this model looks much less predatory than other games with pulling systems where you simply can't progress without certain characters, abilities, or items, or worse where said items give a completely unfair advantage against other players in a PvP environment.
      Game developers have to make their money back somehow when they give the game away for free, would you prefer that they charge £30 For the game?
      In the mobile community no one would buy it and the playerbase would be so small it would be taken off the market in a matter of a couple of months.
      Not trying to be antagonistic just pointing out it's the only way games survive on mobile these days

    • @merrickal
      @merrickal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They shouldn’t even have pay-for-cosmetics because that just allows them to add pay-to-win items later down the line. Pay once, premium game. With additional add-on expansion packs that are pay to unlock. - But it’s easier to get players on a dopamine high with a loot box that costs a buck and loop millions into the pay-to-get-high style all the other mobile games tend to run with.

    • @SamuraiMotoko
      @SamuraiMotoko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelwatterson600 you fight against the game, and the developer adjust drop rates and XP at their will, so being able to defeat it by just paying is immoral
      Also the "they have to make their money" is a lie, they want all the money.
      You say "would you prefer to pay 30 bucks for the complete game". So then why there is no limit on how much money can be wasted in the game, once you pay the 30 bucks you get all the paid unlocks.
      Nah, it's a system to steal all the money with systems they completely control, and you pay to win the game even in just co-op

    • @marceelino
      @marceelino 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelwatterson600 you never played any mobile games?

    • @michaelwatterson600
      @michaelwatterson600 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marceelino played loads, just quit playing ffbe WotV now there's a predatory game! my point is that it could be much much worse and for a mobile game it looks as though f2p is a viable option and won't effect your experience as much as in other games that force you down the pay to play route. At the end of the day it is what it is, if your not happy with it or it's buisness model then skip it or play f2p and wait for diablo 4. People certainly aren't going to change blizzards minds by complaining about it or after the disaster that was Blizzcon they would have cancelled producing it

  • @kyles6813
    @kyles6813 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i just want to get my hands on it. I was one of the few who was not angry at immortal. i had no hard feelings hell they even said it was not diablo 4 when it was released. More angry at the wait then anything. Going into the Third year since it was announced Damn a interesting idea for the charm, Using a single charm to help build along with

    • @FatalFist
      @FatalFist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Immortal itself wasn't bad, it's how they set up the event itself. If Diablo 4 was announced as just a trailer for the main event, nobody would have cared about Immortal or at least would have been more receptive. The issue was that Blizzard marked Blizzcon 2018 to have this Diablo news only to use Immortal as the head main event and that pissed gamers off. Rightfully so. But the concept itself is fine since when I'm not at home, which is majority of the time, I am on my phone. And since I'm a PC player, I can't lug that shit around to play my games. A Looter JRPG for mobile is desperately needed, I've been bored of Archer Hero but it's the only thing that gives me progression where other games use paywalls and shit.

  • @onatgz
    @onatgz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    umm is sub-30 fps an artefact of the recording software, or...
    what is the performance like? what device did you use? how hot did it get?
    what about battery consumption?
    (can you answer those, or are these no-noes regarding the nda?)

    • @onatgz
      @onatgz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      is talking about what is and isn't allowed under the nda, ok under the nda?

    • @onatgz
      @onatgz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how about answering that question? does that break nda?

    • @Rhykker
      @Rhykker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lmao NDA lifted before I posted video, I can talk about anything. Fps was solid 60 in game, my recording is shit. I used a pixel 5. It got hot, but battery lasted forever (compared to my old phone; I just got the pixel 5)

    • @onatgz
      @onatgz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Rhykker ayy thx for the info. if the fps is 60 even in alpha, should be good on that front then. say what you will about blizzard and activision and the direction they're taking. but they sure can optimize and polish their games pretty well.

  • @oneminutewonder77
    @oneminutewonder77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still won't ever understand why they didn't just announce that they were working on Diablo 4 when they announced this. Literally all they needed to do. The idea of a mobile game with the scale of Diablo is awesome. But you don't tell PC players to play with their phone.

    • @leannhocuspocus4810
      @leannhocuspocus4810 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Investors. If they announced Diablo 4 during that year's blizzcon - it would have been priced into the company's share price, and in turn inflated the stock price. Not necessarily a bad thing, however, depending on the horizon in when they predict to launch D4, it may turn out to be a PR nightmare. Gamers do not like to wait, just look at what happened with Cyberpunk.

  • @magus104
    @magus104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    im so sick of the ignorant comments that diablo3 auction house was the problem with the game at launch. surely it couldnt have been the insane volume of lvl 1 items we were getting at lvl 60 because "more RNG means it takes longer to get a BiS therefore more replay-ability" - wyatt cheng

    • @martinatzejensen6787
      @martinatzejensen6787 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't it be both?
      Also throw in a ham-fisted story with over-the-top voice-acting and a weak plot, and we got a trifecta.

    • @firstname4337
      @firstname4337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it was obviously one of the MANY problems

  • @soloplayer78
    @soloplayer78 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Is this playable with a controller? Please no more stash space problems. Oh, are there achievements in the game? Thanks for the informative video again Rhykker!

    • @Lichelf
      @Lichelf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Currently there isn't controller support as far as i know. I don't know how it would work either as you have to aim skills with your right thumb when you click on them and you can't do that with a normal controller button.

    • @ChurchInAshes
      @ChurchInAshes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've read from other comments there is already controller support in the game but not certain. ?

  • @ngtony2969
    @ngtony2969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    younger? i don't remember cain ever being young even in d1
    Also, stop saying it's all free it's all accessible. Playing for 50 years to finish a short game by grinding because you are slowed to turtle speed if you don't pay isn't called free or accessible.

    • @Tyrannimarja
      @Tyrannimarja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like to call this payment model the pay-to-enjoy box - or in this case one could say that it's the "Nephalem mode" where you get your godhood in the actually intended pace; losing your wallet, but actually gaining air in the process.
      Game is accessible, from the store, because it can be downloaded for free by anyone who has a mobile device (not to those who can't use these), but all the content is not due the implemented division. Technically some of it is free, but actual enjoyment has a price. Instead of an up-front cost, the goal post has been moved and shaped into a gateway cost popping up inside the game in certain intervals.
      I personally like the up-front fees, but occasionally a subscription is okay too. Gateway pop-up ads can show themselves out.

  • @winkbrace
    @winkbrace 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I was almost getting a little exited and then the monetization came up and that implementation is a dealbreaker for me. Exactly what I dislike about mobile games.

    • @dragosb.5059
      @dragosb.5059 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So, bassicaly will be a pay2win game? Hope not...

    • @ProT3ch
      @ProT3ch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah same. I'm interested in the story, so probably do the campaign once and then delete it. It's Free to Play so I don't have to spend money to do that. Not interested in the battle pass, daily quest, crafting part.

    • @Toopa88
      @Toopa88 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bas de Ruiter: you almost make it sound like you are asking for a f2p game with no monetisation mechanics. From what I have seen here, the monetisation seems to be very appropriate. If you don't want to spend money on games, then you should stick to browser games.

    • @winkbrace
      @winkbrace 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Toopa88 please point out where I said I don't want to pay for games? As a matter of fact I buy a couple of games each month. On pc. Mobile games often build in pay-to-win walls, which is never fun.

  • @youyoawad
    @youyoawad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    im actually looking forward to try it, not gonna quickly judge it based on the announcement because this actually looks decent

  • @WilliamAndrews0
    @WilliamAndrews0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    I would have no problem paying 20€ for a mobile game, if it is as expansive at this, but i will not pay for a goddamn battlepass.

    • @SilverNomadTV
      @SilverNomadTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I hate battle passes, they are slavery contracts.

    • @MrFearlesskiller
      @MrFearlesskiller 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Then dont?

    • @7kortos7
      @7kortos7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      only acceptable battle passes are the ones that give you enough "gems" or whatever to repurchase it next time. that way if you keep playing you only have to buy it once. but idk if that's the direction they are taking.

    • @WilliamAndrews0
      @WilliamAndrews0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@7kortos7 yeah, that would be ok. Alternatively, if you could get enough gems to purchase a battlepass just by playing the game, i would be fine with that too. But taking Diablo and making it a "free" game, only to then make good items and rewards a subscription-service is bullshit. and a battlepass is nothing different than a subscription. If you get it once, you will get it again, because playing normal without the battlepass after you had it once, feels like cutting down a tree with wet bread.

    • @7kortos7
      @7kortos7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WilliamAndrews0 agree 100%

  • @jonathanabgrall6075
    @jonathanabgrall6075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'll decide if i bother when i see the monetization. The mobile market earned absolutely no good faith in that regard and i don't expect Blizzard to be any different.

    • @kreiyu
      @kreiyu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I plan on playing for the lore. Not really sure if ill play past the story so monetization doesn't matter that much to me.

    • @synmad3638
      @synmad3638 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you even watch the video?

    • @jonathanabgrall6075
      @jonathanabgrall6075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@synmad3638 Yep and seeing a ton of potential for bullshit. Just the fact he was power-gated at some point means xp boosters and shit like that are likely.
      Yes i'm aware none of that is in the alpha right now.

    • @krectus
      @krectus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He explains the monetization in detail near the end of the video.

    • @jonathanabgrall6075
      @jonathanabgrall6075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@krectus Because companies can't patch in stuff a month after release (and after reviews) right?

  • @ScorchHellfire
    @ScorchHellfire 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Not sure I like how they basically took the D3 art style and made it even more flashy/cartoony and over-the-top.

  • @deepaksingh-ku9uf
    @deepaksingh-ku9uf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i liked the presentation of how the story is being handled

  • @drydz8670
    @drydz8670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It has more of that D4 flavor into it. Darker, colors are a bit more subdued. I like it.

  • @AEKTZIS2121
    @AEKTZIS2121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I would love to see you doing a mini series on the lore of this game as some of us will not be touching the game solely because its a mobile game and our thumbs arent cut out for these small screens xD

  • @Christian.314
    @Christian.314 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Free to play, with optional ingame purchases.
    if that dies not raise 100 red flags, i don't know......

    • @mrobject9113
      @mrobject9113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh ya and how's that AAA non-MTX huge launch Cyberpunk working out...oh not good...cool.
      When I hear about another AAA title with no MTX, red flags pop in my head, I'm thinking, how are they even making money on this title? Oh its because they're gonna No Mans Sky it, release it broken and patch it over the next years...
      Name me a single AAA title that released 'finished' in the last two years....GL with that.

    • @Christian.314
      @Christian.314 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@mrobject9113 no need for me to name any game, since i despise AAA games. but i will name one. Doom Eternal.
      my comment was more targeted at the "marketing" and "monetization" of Mobile games.
      the problem is, activition-blizzard will make lots and lots of money with Diablo Immortal... even if its bad.
      since there will be sketchy micro transactions that will make them money money money.
      AAA does the same thing, with the "Battle passes" "deluxe editions" "lootboxes" and so on and so on.....
      we as fans are only money-cows to be milked. this is why i hate their step to go mobile.

  • @toshibavoodoo
    @toshibavoodoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Did it work with Spen!? Love Note10 this is a must!!!

  • @nathanielmayo4950
    @nathanielmayo4950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this expansive covering on DI... I've been impatiently waiting for this to drop for a long time now and this was a great watch!

  • @Wodzian0
    @Wodzian0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What phone do you use? How is fps?

  • @crimsonblackchannel
    @crimsonblackchannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Charms is still a thing I love about Diablo 2. Hope they'll implement it again in D4 but using a different approach such as offering a dedicated inventory solely for charms or something

    • @martinatzejensen6787
      @martinatzejensen6787 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wasn't the point of charms that they buffed you but took inventory space? Otherwise it'd just be another ring or amulet.

    • @matejbosela9093
      @matejbosela9093 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@martinatzejensen6787 look for last epoch idol system - doesnt take inventory per se, but its own dedicated inventory can take 4 of the biggest ones or 16 smallest ones. Big ones = better bonuses, just like large charms and so on.

    • @nathanliteroy9835
      @nathanliteroy9835 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They already have "charms" in Diablo Immortal - it's gems. There are less slots for them, but functionally they are identical, the only difference is naming

    • @dofydudes1735
      @dofydudes1735 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@martinatzejensen6787 They can make it like Project D2, whereas the charms still function like that, but this time with a semi-dedicated inventory space.

    • @Daniel-rd6st
      @Daniel-rd6st 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well i hated them personally, because they sucked up your inventory space. So you were basically sacreficing quality of life for power.

  • @quacht1995
    @quacht1995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Gonna try to keep an open mind for D Immortals despite the Blizzcon mess, but probably going to see if it'll be available on Bluestacks upon actual release. I'm no mobile gamer, as touch controls aren't for me.

    • @endlesswaters196
      @endlesswaters196 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Had the same thought. How ever they might make where you have to have blizz account to log in. Im still new to blue stacks and have trouble logging in with my google account. Emulator community does like a challenge though!

    • @IanAlcorn
      @IanAlcorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I run Nox for most of my mobile games for the same reason, and it's been great. It doesn't emulate any version of Android higher than 7 though, which is fine for what I do.

  • @MrTonyman79
    @MrTonyman79 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm fine with a Battle pass I think that is fair and shows support for the game with giving the player goals and accomplishments.

  • @MrOverHeels
    @MrOverHeels 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait, there was no one note worthy that we encountered in Dark Wood in D2. If you're referring to The Countess, she was in Black Marsh

    • @Rhykker
      @Rhykker  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I screwed up :(

  • @oof6755
    @oof6755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi bro, love ur diablo videos, btw diablo immortal suddenly vanished from my google playstore, i was pre registered in there for 2 years, does it need more than 4gb ram to play?

  • @MR_ARKANSAS
    @MR_ARKANSAS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    IDK, theres a lot of hate, but this looks pretty cool for a mobile game. I might play this actually.

    • @marlowencna
      @marlowencna 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I liked everything as a mobile action game.. Up until the monetization.
      I have no gripes about Microtxn but DImmortal is selling power

    • @vansserafim
      @vansserafim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      there was never any sense in that hate in the first place

    • @MR_ARKANSAS
      @MR_ARKANSAS 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marlowencna maybe i didnt notice but i only saw currency? are there endgame weapons being sold? if not i dont consider it selling power.

  • @alexchopov
    @alexchopov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    is that a location called Rhykker's Plaza? (pronounced in local accents, obviously, but we know, we know)

  • @MrMrTravman
    @MrMrTravman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Imagine if all this was folded into a new Diablo 3 expansion..... But, nope, here we are.

    • @Yolo_Swagins
      @Yolo_Swagins 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      MTX will be strong in this one

    • @Torskel
      @Torskel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      PC gamers need to calm their tits, mobile players need something great to play as well

    • @mrobject9113
      @mrobject9113 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the very fact that they didn't do that shows you what's actually profitable. How do you even know D4 isn't gonna be a MTX stuffed F2P mmo-lite

    • @Yolo_Swagins
      @Yolo_Swagins 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrobject9113 oh im pretty much sure D4 will hawe tons of MTX maybe not in EU/USA but in china that will be completly different game.

  • @gundamhufflepuff2383
    @gundamhufflepuff2383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s not a big deal at all, but does it allow you to remove the footprints guidance mechanism? Thanks for the video!

  • @TheBagManGamer
    @TheBagManGamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So Rhykker if I want to play a portable Diablo game, what gives the best experience in your opinion? Diablo Immortal for Mobile or Diablo III for Nintendo Switch?

  • @ninjii12
    @ninjii12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    PC gamers thinking they're forced to play this on mobile
    me: *opens up bluestacks*

    • @i_am_ergo
      @i_am_ergo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And connecting a second mouse? Movement + using skills with just one is going to be a nightmare.

    • @RJCMaxification
      @RJCMaxification 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@i_am_ergo bluestacks lets you use your keyboard or even a controller but I still don't think its ideal

    • @FatalFist
      @FatalFist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I prefer PC but I can't take my PC to work, set it up, and play it during lunch.

  • @Purple_Lilith
    @Purple_Lilith 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Looking at the monetization. And I'm out.

  • @slickperspective2745
    @slickperspective2745 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    One of the channels out there that I hit LIKE 👍 button before even playing the video.
    Keep it up Decard "Rhykker" Cain.
    We're always listening!

  • @benjoe1993
    @benjoe1993 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Rhykker, I haven't watched the full video yet as I would like to experience the game for myself but a thing that I haven't seen discussed anywhere so far is whether the game allows for the use of external controllers (via bluetooth or other means). Or does it require you to hunch over the little screen with thumbs covering half of the screen?
    Basically I'm thinking if it's possible to have a PS4 controller control the game while it's being cast onto a huge TV, turning your phone into a console?

    • @yuqijiang5903
      @yuqijiang5903 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      As far as we know the external controllers have not been supported officially in Alpha, I've seen one or two streamers tried with their keyboard though.

    • @benjoe1993
      @benjoe1993 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yuqijiang5903 Did they manage to navigate the menus with it?

  • @ReubenRosa
    @ReubenRosa 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am a gamer. Yes I primarily play on a pc..but I have an ipad pro and I do play games there .. so I am definitely pumped for Diablo Immortal and I was pumped when they first announced it period. I was not suprised that Diablo 4 is taking time to be made and I am glad for that.

  • @koski7579
    @koski7579 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    the fact you get legendaries from battlepass just ruins the game :/

    • @PineappleBaconPizza
      @PineappleBaconPizza 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe they aren't as good as legendaries that you can get without the battle pass.

    • @BlinkHawk
      @BlinkHawk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it seems only from the free side, not from the paid side.

  • @laconsuela69
    @laconsuela69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm a PC gamer through and through but I could see myself having fun with immortal if I were visiting family for the holidays or something.
    I definitely don't like the "pay to speed up progress" model, because that indicates that progressing will be slow enough to make you want to spend money. Progressing in an ARPG is supposed to be the fun part, and if you can just pay to skip through it, what's the point?

  • @chrisbriscoe4401
    @chrisbriscoe4401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have been watching you for a long time. I usually love your videos. This feels like Diablo devs have paid you off and it’s missing the info why the people are ticked about this being a phone game in the first place. Computer game company making a game on the phone to drastically rip off us, the people.

    • @Evento0
      @Evento0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Game companies make games in order to make money, mobile or not. The mobile market is huge, not making a mobile game would be idiotic. If you have no interest in mobile games, then this is not for you. Stop bitching about it and wait for D4.

    • @Spanluver
      @Spanluver 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Evento0 STFU don’t come here in the comments section acting high and mighty talking finances. Nobody gives a shit about all that. They spat in the face of gamers, and this YT has been compromised.

  • @kaiiboraka
    @kaiiboraka 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know most people are gonna be a little disconnected from this game because it's mobile, but I'm genuinely hyped about this game. I love Diablo 3 like crazy, and I don't have an issue with different control schemes. And that it's free to play will mean it'll be 10x easier to get my friends to try and join me. Thanks for the detailed rundown, Rhykker! Can't wait to get to try it myself!

  • @ex-bahamutgamer8381
    @ex-bahamutgamer8381 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Rhykker. I got question and related to Diablo 2. Can I use mods like visual upgrade on Diablo 2 without getting banned ?

  • @pdxdude
    @pdxdude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There's something really off with this video. I've watched so many of Rhykkers videos. This sounds like it was a sponsored raid shadow legends type of video. Rhykker just didn't have the usual enthusiasm. I'm not accusing him of not disclosing a sponsorship btw. Just the tone and feel of the video. The 2 red flags to me were when he says how he's not a controller player or phone player but a die hard mouse and keyboard player then goes on to say how playing Diablo immortal on the phone felt natural. Then when he talks about the monetization near the end and talks about legendary crests and what they do and then quickly says how it's not pay to win though! Idk I just feel like something is off here

    • @kasperk679
      @kasperk679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Illuminati thinker over here. Somebody likes something that you don’t like so lets think that something “fishy” is going on. Maybe he just likes the game and gave his proper opinion about it?

    • @pdxdude
      @pdxdude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kasperk679 when did I say I didn't like it? It actually looks pretty fun due to the new systems in the game.

  • @Jon12M
    @Jon12M 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Maybe now we find out more about, what happened to all the D2 characters!

    • @Steph1
      @Steph1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They got raped by the farmer, milking them til the last dollar

    • @snuffeldjuret
      @snuffeldjuret 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Steph1 the one in Diablo Hellfire? He was always fishy.

    • @stakeandburn
      @stakeandburn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They die, a butterfly kill em all...

    • @Steph1
      @Steph1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      snuffeldjuret nah I just mean that Activision Blizzard is raping the entire series including the characters

    • @snuffeldjuret
      @snuffeldjuret 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Steph1 I know :D I just wanted to make an obscure Diablo reference :D.

  • @andrewferris1903
    @andrewferris1903 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Haters are gonna hate, but I am looking forward to the D2 nostalgia and being able to play the game anywhere/time I want to.

    • @den2002ph
      @den2002ph 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      d3 switch left the group

  • @SwissSareth
    @SwissSareth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you tried connecting a controller to your phone? Does the game support it?
    Because I'll be honest, I'm probably going to play this for the lore, so if I need to bloody play it on my phone, I'm going to stream it to my TV and use a controller

  • @nomercy8989
    @nomercy8989 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't they say the game is almost ready like 2 years ago?

  • @BlazingDonkeyTrash
    @BlazingDonkeyTrash 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    doesn't look better than D3. Not sure where anyone is seeing this.

  • @baconfromhell666
    @baconfromhell666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great selling point. "We got this game, now it's a slightly different version of a game you've already been playing for years, but you can play this one on a very small screen and you will end up getting forced adds and "micro" transactions down your throat" Sounds great.

    • @colin8477
      @colin8477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      “You can play this one a very small screen” is the whole point, and a good thing for many people

  • @honkinhonk3454
    @honkinhonk3454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    ahh yes crafting mtx incoming as expected

  • @KoalaOalaJones
    @KoalaOalaJones 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know if you can play the same account on two devices like switching between your phone and then your iPad?

  • @lazygamer7469
    @lazygamer7469 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there an option for immediate execution of skills? I hate the blue targetting markers. I learned to execute diablo skills at the right distance and angle without those stupid blue markers. Adding that blue marker is another command input on the player

  • @krectus
    @krectus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great overview. Monetization is just about what we thought it would be. A lot of good looking improvements over D3 is kinda unexpected. Obviously worth checking out because its free. But damn still in Alpha, that sucks, hoping its going to take too much longer. Sorry you're getting so many downvotes, PC babies, err, PC gamers are a fussy bunch aren't they?

    • @nbs90
      @nbs90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because people are not allowed to be upset with a garbage pay to win and barely ready for testing considering how far people expected this small game would be by now? But ohh no, instead it must be those cry babies. Use logic next time instead of crying about people crying.....

    • @krectus
      @krectus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nbs90 what are your actual complaints about this video that you think warrants it getting downvoted?

  • @romtombom
    @romtombom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Stopped watching at battle pass. It was already painful but that just put the nail in the coffin. Diablo is dead

  • @vansserafim
    @vansserafim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why are you even giving attention to the stupid haters? No one cares about them. Only people who interested in the game watch this. Don't give credit to the haters

    • @alantremonti1381
      @alantremonti1381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People hate being abused and harvested, but, screw the haters am I right.

  • @JWelson9980
    @JWelson9980 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s really crazy (and good) to see a mobile game analyzed and critiqued like a full PC game. I hope other IPs are watching and we can get better mobile games for when I am out and about and want to play my favorite franchises. I have a switch, but I am way more likely to kick back for a few minutes with my phone than pull out a mobile game system. Game looks great and I appreciate your top notch review/coverage!

  • @zippo718
    @zippo718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think they moved skill runes into legendary equipment. There are equipment that change how certain skills work.

  • @p0ma147
    @p0ma147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video is a solid 10/10 for Rhykker trying to hide his pain.

  • @adamsanchez222
    @adamsanchez222 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Shout out to Filthierich 9:26 my favorite Glacius player from Killer Instinct.

  • @Bob.Roberts
    @Bob.Roberts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Okay, so pay to win, 'nuff said. Pay to win and pay to "speed up/progress" is the same, no matter how else you word it; if a whale can surpass all your hours of hard work and grinding with a simple transaction, then he wins. Props to Rhykker for speaking his mind enough to voice some negative feedback about this and not simply shilling for the company though.

  • @menpee
    @menpee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the preview.
    The only question remains is the system requirements. What kind of device did you play it? Based on the video there were constant drops to-, or even under 20fps which seemed choppy.

  • @JGEntertainmentTV
    @JGEntertainmentTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't have time to watch the whole video. Will it have guild system? Or will it be coop only like genshin.
    Thanks

  • @varthdata
    @varthdata 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I finished the Alpha content a few days ago and so far loving it. It really does feel like Diablo3 mobile edition, but there are certainly some nice quality-of-life changes. I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next. Transmogs would be great, but I hear that's a no. Also, Monks are OP and play great. Performance is fantastic on my Note10+, graphics look amazing.

  • @leiferikson4279
    @leiferikson4279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    WOW! Is that a whole 7 FPS? POGGERS!

  • @RealAzK
    @RealAzK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's not p2w.
    chances of getting attributes you want without reforging/runes: 0.01%. Chances with reforging/runes: 50%.
    chances of getting legendary gems and rune drops without rift shards: 0.01%. Chances with rift shards: 100%.
    chances of getting some op build defining legendary without battle pass: 0.0%. Chances with battle pass: handed to you at x level.
    Yeah, not p2w at all bruddas.

  • @Kestila
    @Kestila 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    looks kinda nice, I hope it isn't bad on release, will play this definitely

  • @abrazor
    @abrazor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    No idea when it will be released to the public or if new people can get in on the Beta time?