Not even sure why Sweden and Finland are included since there coast isn't on the Arctic Ocean. Iceland has pretty limited claims due to distance as well.
@@basicfantasy2931 That is just a small part of the most northern Island Grimsey, Over 99% of Iceland totally landmass is under/south of the Polar circle
@@christofferpetersson3625 Yes they are located in the north, but they cannot claim arctic territories because they do not have any access to Arctic Ocean.
True 53% of the Arctic is made up of russian territory and there are several russian islands far north in the artic region. Unlike the Scandinavian countries.
They can't! ... It's in Canada The northern passage is bellow Canadian islands . There will be a right of passage . USA will surely team up ,We would welcome them for sure & actually perhaps CHINA 🇨🇳 will side & be more friendly to us *again. Which isn't bad .
OP said North Sea Route (which is inaccurate) and not Northern Passage. There's plenty of Arctic Ocean for ships to sail through without have to go in to Canadian waters.@@sarahsokal
I live in Alaska and trust me the ice is still here. There is no global warming. I keep track of daily highs and lows on my property and in the last 5 years alone we have dropped in temperature by an average of 5 degrees.
Hmm who do I trust? Your subjective opinion or scientific data + rival governments throwing hundreds of billions in development and 20x times higher trade through the arctic?
Sweden don't according to Sweden: "Sweden has no territorial claims in the Arctic Ocean", my guess is that the creator misunderstood somehow. www.government.se/contentassets/85de9103bbbe4373b55eddd7f71608da/swedens-strategy-for-the-arctic-region-2020.pdf
Since Norway reached the north pole first, and planted a flag, all of the arctics should belong to Norway. Nahh. three hundred years ago it would have been like that. But I do think that Norway should be given a bigger slice of the area than its arctic coastalline would merit.
If you can somehow edit this, it would be pertinent to add a graphic of some sort at 3:56 informing viewers to the effects of a Mercator map on the routes you drew. Because, although the math works out (obviously), the difference between your verbal description and the visual dotted lines doesn't make sense from a visual point of view in a video without prior knowledge of this.
The answer is to stop all trade. Make and consume locally. If You need nothing from countries far away then You can stop trade, telecommunication and travel. This helps save the planet. You do not need to make Yourself vulnerable to enemies and can live in peace. #LessIsMore
The Arctic is a polar region located at the northernmost part of Earth. The Arctic consists of the Arctic Ocean, adjacent seas, and parts of Canada, Danish Realm, northern Finland, Iceland, northern Norway, Russia, northernmost Sweden and the United States.
Sweden nor Finland has a border to the Sea of ice or the Arctic ocean, but the thin strip of land owned by Norway that severs them is more of a formality since Norway technically ventured and claimed those areas first (completely ignoring the indigenous Sàmi people). But Sweden and Finland are just as active in this region in reality as Norway is, and thus just as involved in any conflict involving this area. A lot of joint military exercises are performed in the region.
Really bad (or lazy) choice to use Mercator map for showing the dotted line difference in distance. If each a few hundred kilometres in real distance you just misrepresented this proposed shipping route's distance by an enormous factor. @3:40 I would have been impressed if you thought of this and presented a top-down globe shaped map for your diagram.
I think the Finns are confused by this as well, lol. Best I can think of is an extension of their former hold on Petsamo, a region the soviets conquered during WW2. But what I think really happened here is that Trailblazers HQ made a mistake
Really appreciate this - thanks! I’ll keep making good videos and the algorithm will do its magic. Thanks for watching! Hopefully you’ve subscribed as well. We’ve got a fun video coming out this weekend.
I think it's sad that the superpowers like the US and Russia is fighting over land that is relative far away from them, and there's Iceland, Greenland, Canada, Norway etc that is right far more closer the north pole that don't get much included.
You don’t understand this could change some whole country position in the world if they get access to oil and the USA and Russia just want to make sure they have enough oil to live off of for the next 100 years
Not really. The US and Russia are the only powers that are able to "defend" and militarize such a place as big as the arctic. Norway and Canada are closer but they slash their military budget every chance they get, so I doubt they would be willing to create dedicated Arctic Force to be stationed in the region 24/7
In this fight for the north pole russia also claimed svalbard an internationally agreed upon norwegian island, and claimed that norways border should go at an angle to cut them of from the poles, and as such around 2010 russian fishermen were jailed after they fished in norway and refused to release the fish, to which a family of 4 was kidnapped in russia and russia said wanna trade...
Even though the pie idea is the best and most reasonable ...it will give Russia more than 50% of all the artic circle since more than 50% of the artic coasts are russian: most western countries will not agree with that! There should not be "international waters" there as this will encourage criminal activities in a ressource reach region, also no one will feel particularly responsible for security, recue mission and ice breaking in the international waters which will negatively affect trade routes
FACT: Canadian Parlaiment, in response to the Russians North pole claim, issued Santa Claus a Canadian Passport! How can the North pole be Russian when Santa's Canadian eh? LMAO true story
Well the Arctic is the subject of common interest between Canada the United States and Russia for the resources they all want . But I don't think anyone can lay any sole dominant claims as it would lead to fighting for it. It's human nature among even the worlds most powerful leaders right?
It's such an important question and this is not a final answer to your ending question: But by reason's intuition, the proposed rules in this situation, the law of the sea, sound quite acceptable and could make the difference between an Arctic war and development of commercial, natural resource, eco-travel and such purposes. Arctic oil is valuable if harvested for market soon; But the trade route is probably more valuable. Right now, oil is black gold; But our cutting edge automotive science has calculated a new engineering paradigm for auto-transport: which is far safer and superior in every way, including resource and eco-efficiency that can't be carried out with petrol; Because petrol doesn't communicate with computer systems and sensors, unlike electricity which does so at the rapid pace required. That's one pincher coming for oil; the other is a cleft monster claw of immediate expanding nuclear fission, which is potentially far better business for Russia(or anyone else with the vision and intestines to 'Just Do It,' like Oregon's Nike) and imminent nuclear fusion through state funded firms like America's Helion Corporation. Since we started sinking taxpayer(American) R & D money in billions into nuclear fusion research, there's been an enormous scientific/industrial breakthrough, a holy grail physics sought for fifty years of serious research; till people thought it was like pirate treasure. We'll finish the job. In the short run, regular nuclear fission is a better investment than Arctic oil in my view; Russian companies go into willing countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka and set up nuclear fission plants and storage systems(not to mention all of China,) then a country goes from the masses of its population and countryside having no or little electricity(we will carry out this regime even in Africa; the Russians will stabilize these matters and employ locals and natives of said nations) to having unlimited, practically free power like France did before it grew a sissy streak; and it won't have any more melt-downs than France did; or Russia has in so many decades. Chernobyl was back in the dinosaur days; when the nuclear power tech was just being developed. But nuclear fusion is the ultimate answer; It goes in stages of industrial evolution.
If I is retreating why does every time a sub surfaces there is plenty of thick ice plus tems that are real cold. There is plenty of ICE on the Russian side too plus so many Polar Bears that Sarah Palin ought to be on speed dial.
This universe belongs to God Shiva.. with history of millions of years .. remaining all are known for only 2000 or 3000 yrs only .. dnt b foolish .. if u dig under ur place there u get any hindu symbolic only .. its 💯 true
Somple. Make the arctic its own territory, no one owns it, no one toucjes it with anything other than a ship, no drilling, no developing. Anyone using it pays a tariff to cross it
You are free to travel to Antarctic. It cost a lot, and is cold, dangerous and hostile. But go right ahead, nobody will stop you. Pro tip: go in the summer.
Nobody should be able to do anything in that area. That’s where the Crill are and everything without that the whole ego system will crash in the ocean.
Because seawater is warmer and saltier than floating ice, changes in the amount of this ice are affecting global sea levels. Also if you do an experiment with a cup of water an ice, that experiment wont take into account the water level before the cup was filled with ice. If you did the same experiment with a cup of water that was almost full and then you added a big iceberg to it, it would squash over the top. Archimedes principle is formulated in terms of forces that are linked to weight or equivalent mass, not to volume. Melting sea-ice may cause small changes in sea level. The salt concentration in icebergs and sea-ice is less that of the seawater which holds it buoyant. So if sea-ice melts in the water, the local salt concentration, and hence the seawater density, decreases. To maintain a constant pressure at the bottom of the ocean, which is a fine assumption when considering the surrounding waters to be unchanged, one would (regionally) need a higher column of less dense water. The Archimedes argument breaks down there because of the density of the water does not remain constant throughout the melting process. Density changes also occur when the temperature of the seawater changes due to the latent heat needed to convert ice to water, essentially counteracting some of the above effects. So, the melting of icebergs a sea-ice could cause some sea-level change. However, this effect is expected to be smaller than the direct contribution of the grounded ice sources. There are a lot more icebergs being created because of ice flowing off of ice sheets, like Greenland or Antarctica. Because when you take ice from the land where there is a significant part of the mass that is above sea level and put that ice into the ocean, that raises the sea level. Besides the total amount of the non-floating Arctic and Antarctic ice is about 50 times higher, and because this is not currently floating (and displacing water), if it were all to melt the sea levels would rise significantly. The melting iceberg increase sea-level rise for a bit. But, how about a warmer condition? Of course, the volume bigger caused by expansion. It is more complicated when we also count the salinity factor. Yet, the biggest challenge comes from the effect of global warming itself.
The Antarctic nations are Chile Argentina New Zealand Australia Madagaskar South Africa + Lesotho (because they are an enclave, and it's not their fault) Have I left out anyone, some island nations perhaps? OK I forgot the UK because of the Falklands. Russia, China,, etc should be only guests there IMO because the are not Antarctic nations. And Russia wants to control the Arctic...
53% of the Arctic is made up of russian territory and there are several russian islands far north in the artic region! Unlike the Scandinavian countries!!! No Wonder why 53% of the Arctic belongs to Russia😀
Thats just an excuse in the west so you will pay higher taxes for the next 30years preparing to finnance a long war, in 2050 when the ice melts the arctic war will begin between NATO and Russia.
Funny thing is about this ice, is that, IT'S JUST AS THICK AS IT WAS OVER A 1,000 YEARS AGO! Interesting that. By the way, the polar bears up here are doing fine. Still looks like the middle of winter up here. its still quite cold even for April 2023.
To measure sea ice takes many factors, not only the thickness of ice but also the square mileage of these ice sheets each year, which is on a steady decline. As for Polar Bears they are far from fine. Many Polar bears have began migration south in search for food. As the hunt on ice sheets that are slowly depleting. This not only causes a threat to Polar Bears but also to human living in nothern countries where these bears are looking for new food sources. Threating humans and surrounding ecosystems that these bears and not naturally from.
@@ericschilling4567 I live up north! Enough said oh and even cougars come down to saskatchewan and manitoba above and below the 54 Parallel and the polar bears havce ALWAYS come into these regions, they were originally the Brown Bear and evolved INTO ----YES INTO our Climate!!! Your ignorance is amusing, Stop drinking the Kool-Aid! Have a great day! PS The Ice is Fine and if it finally disappears thats is a GOOD thing! Just because humans decide to act as if this is against the laws of natures doesnt make it BAD! In fact we used to be far more tropical here before the POLAR SHIFTS!!! Now that we are currently under another SHIFT we shall get WARMER more WET more TROPICAL like weather however we will still get winter. Climates happen every day. Get used toit. Seriously there is nothing to panic about other then WEATHER WARS AND MAINIPULATION -- GEO Engineering. Corporate Propaganda. Military Corporations Like NASA, HAARP, DARPA. Military industrial complex, KLAUS SCHWAB- WEF, UN, NATO, WHO, IMF, World BANKERS aka FEDS etc
Using ICESat measurements, scientists found that overall Arctic sea ice thinned about 0.17 meters (7 inches) a year, for a total of 0.68 meters (2.2 feet) over four winters. The total area covered by the thicker, older "multi-year" ice that has survived one or more summers shrank by 42 percent.
@00:34 "While this is a risk to humans as a result of rising oceans.". This is simply not true, the melting of the arctic ice does not affect sea water level at all.
@@JamesSmith-ix5jd America has strong foundation , native Americans help build it strong along with blacks and whites we have all races here we are most powerful , yes we have trouble with each other but we heal those propblems and then we will be most United country this universe has ever seen.
It well part is owned by inuient people living on the northern shores of Canada a lot of them are trained as army rangers because of there knoledge of the area they have saved so many people getting lost or surcoming to weather conditions and they patrol entire North of Canada Russia just wants anything that gets it closer to North America plus minerals money money at least the Eskimos keep it all natural and for ice if you look at James Bay North part of Manitoba the town of Churchill Manatoba gets surrounded by polar bears for the entire summer making a dangerous situation ice is taking longer and longer to freeze they even have the only polar bear prison in world for repeat offenders it's big business one of only taking tourists out to see them it's only accessible by plane or train no road but it's a good thing for people running tourist attractions but they constantly have polar bear patrols 24 hours a day never walk alone there have been a few people mauled or killed but it's because no food and they just look at us as food at least the bear jail keeps slot of bears from being shot and hold them for the summer and release in winter but the ice is going fast and longer to freeze again which eventually will push polar bears south looking for food
Russia was not the owner of arctic but .....over thann 50 % area was russian military teritory , like or doesnt like its the reality happened on arctic
I thinks it belongs to Canada 🇨🇦 & Russia 🇷🇺 with small USA portion attached to Canada & portion of Denmark. Canada still own most land mass " Islands near the arctic. Its simple : Canada would preserve it - Russia exploit it. I think Denmark 🇩🇰 🇺🇸 & Canada 🇨🇦need to create an arctic union for the 🌎 health.
The United States is not connected with the Arctic at all, we sold Alaska to them, let them continue to rejoice according to this logic, you can give the Arctic to the Greeks. In tsarist times, we have already been to the Arctic, but, unfortunately, we did not include it in our country.
If you sold Alaska to the USA then Alaska is part of the USA and so USA is connected to the Arctic. Interesting how you Russians and Canadians consider the Arctic as a land when it will soon be ocean once the ice melts. Antarctica is a solid continent and it belongs to New Zealand.😀😄🙂@@MaxAuto-yv6nr
Раньше в Арктике была Великая Даария, она же Арктида, она же Ориана, она же Гиперборея. Там жили предки славян и ариев. После падения осколков Луны Лели на Мидгард Землю, наши предки переселились в течении 16 лет в Евразию (тогда Рассению). Это было 111 000 лет назад. Карты Великой Даарии повсеместно можно найти в интернете.
Not even sure why Sweden and Finland are included since there coast isn't on the Arctic Ocean. Iceland has pretty limited claims due to distance as well.
Probably only because they are in the arctic circle
@@basicfantasy2931 That is just a small part of the most northern Island Grimsey, Over 99% of Iceland totally landmass is under/south of the Polar circle
@@udontknowme7798 i didnt really pay attention to iceland. I meant to reply to Sweden and Finland
Yes nor Sweden or Finland has a coast in the artic. The entire north coast of the Scandinavian peninsula is of Norway
@@stevenrodriguez8021 yes. Did you also know that Sweden and Finland don’t have an arctic coast ?
Sweden and Finland don’t have access to Arctic Ocean! The access is blocked by Norway
@@christofferpetersson3625 Yes they are located in the north, but they cannot claim arctic territories because they do not have any access to Arctic Ocean.
Finland had land connected to The Arctic sea but not anymore
This is massive enlightenment.
Thanks for this vid.
The pie method seems to be the best for splitting it.
Australia should put in a claim seeing as though northern hemisphere countries have claims on areas of Antarctica.
Agree 👍 Same for us in Canada 🇨🇦 !
@@sarahsokal Canada is part of the Arctic Circle!
Right?! What she talking about Willice? Merica should had it all sons of bitch3s
The earth is flat Antarctica encompasses the whole world so yes they have the crust to their slice of pie there the whole world does
@@eklypz01 Stop doing drugs
Bro this video deserves more likes, keep up the good work 👍
Sweden and Finland don't have border with artic.
Not relevant, Sweden & Finland are still member sttaes.
They are a lot of unanswered questions about the artic ocean. It’s the whirl pool of magnet pole and no fly zone.
what are finland and sweden doing there tho, they have no coast to the arctic sea
Even China has its Arctic claim and policy, crazy
Не надо путать предложения с притязаниями. Это же не CNN
I remember when Al Gore promised an ice-free Arctic by 2013
The Arctic belongs to Russia, because of their extended coastline in the north!
True 53% of the Arctic is made up of russian territory and there are several russian islands far north in the artic region. Unlike the Scandinavian countries.
The US has Alaska and Canada also exist in the Arctic
@@carolederent7638man, Russia messed up. They used to own Alaska.
@@laughingman_confused Siberia and the Far east used to be owned by Yakuts, Sakha, Nenets, and other native peoples before Russia genocides them
I don't find problems with that logic.
North Sea route will be the one of the most important routes in near future. Russia and China will team up to develop this route together.
They can't! ... It's in Canada
The northern passage is bellow Canadian islands . There will be a right of passage . USA will surely team up ,We would welcome them for sure & actually perhaps CHINA 🇨🇳 will side & be more friendly to us *again. Which isn't bad .
Google northern passage map
OP said North Sea Route (which is inaccurate) and not Northern Passage. There's plenty of Arctic Ocean for ships to sail through without have to go in to Canadian waters.@@sarahsokal
I live in Alaska and trust me the ice is still here. There is no global warming. I keep track of daily highs and lows on my property and in the last 5 years alone we have dropped in temperature by an average of 5 degrees.
Hmm who do I trust? Your subjective opinion or scientific data + rival governments throwing hundreds of billions in development and 20x times higher trade through the arctic?
How is Sweden apart of the "artic 8"? How do they claim land? Does anyone know?
Sweden don't according to Sweden: "Sweden has no territorial claims in the Arctic Ocean", my guess is that the creator misunderstood somehow.
www.government.se/contentassets/85de9103bbbe4373b55eddd7f71608da/swedens-strategy-for-the-arctic-region-2020.pdf
@@vera-linnlanangen6396Sweden & Finland is member of the arctic 8.
Since Norway reached the north pole first, and planted a flag, all of the arctics should belong to Norway. Nahh. three hundred years ago it would have been like that. But I do think that Norway should be given a bigger slice of the area than its arctic coastalline would merit.
If you can somehow edit this, it would be pertinent to add a graphic of some sort at 3:56 informing viewers to the effects of a Mercator map on the routes you drew. Because, although the math works out (obviously), the difference between your verbal description and the visual dotted lines doesn't make sense from a visual point of view in a video without prior knowledge of this.
I'm not sure why, once it's melted it wouldn't just be claimed international waters.
Fantastic video! Keep up the good work :D
this land is your land , this land is my land . this land was made for you and me.
Except the Arctic isn't land, it's frozen ocean (but not for much longer).
More US military bases to be added, increasing defense budget, more poverty, more homeless for ordinary people
California should stop being NIMBY and build like Texas does if you want less homelessness
You gained yourself an extra subscriber. I love this video, and keep up the good work!💪
Thanks Tango! Really appreciate it.
Amazing video! Thank you!
The answer is to stop all trade. Make and consume locally. If You need nothing from countries far away then You can stop trade, telecommunication and travel. This helps save the planet. You do not need to make Yourself vulnerable to enemies and can live in peace. #LessIsMore
Wtf is Finland doing in the artic with no coastline in it?
because 1/4 of Finland and a significant chunk of Sweden are north of the arctic circle. Despite having no coastline on the arctic ocean.
There is no country within the Antarctic Circle so how come many countries have a piece of that "pie"? (Including my own).@@cedricpatzer6826
The Arctic is a polar region located at the northernmost part of Earth. The Arctic consists of the Arctic Ocean, adjacent seas, and parts of Canada, Danish Realm, northern Finland, Iceland, northern Norway, Russia, northernmost Sweden and the United States.
спасибо, кэп
53% of it belongs to Russia.
Sweden nor Finland has a border to the Sea of ice or the Arctic ocean, but the thin strip of land owned by Norway that severs them is more of a formality since Norway technically ventured and claimed those areas first (completely ignoring the indigenous Sàmi people). But Sweden and Finland are just as active in this region in reality as Norway is, and thus just as involved in any conflict involving this area. A lot of joint military exercises are performed in the region.
Really bad (or lazy) choice to use Mercator map for showing the dotted line difference in distance. If each a few hundred kilometres in real distance you just misrepresented this proposed shipping route's distance by an enormous factor. @3:40
I would have been impressed if you thought of this and presented a top-down globe shaped map for your diagram.
I would love to see a video on Finlands claim and a detailed explanation on the mental gymnastics needed to justify it.
I think the Finns are confused by this as well, lol.
Best I can think of is an extension of their former hold on Petsamo, a region the soviets conquered during WW2.
But what I think really happened here is that Trailblazers HQ made a mistake
They have included finland because usa wants them to fight proxy war.
Your videos are really great.... What's the problem with TH-cam algorithm... Why don't you get many views?
Really appreciate this - thanks! I’ll keep making good videos and the algorithm will do its magic. Thanks for watching! Hopefully you’ve subscribed as well. We’ve got a fun video coming out this weekend.
It doesn’t show on the map
I think it's sad that the superpowers like the US and Russia is fighting over land that is relative far away from them, and there's Iceland, Greenland, Canada, Norway etc that is right far more closer the north pole that don't get much included.
You don’t understand this could change some whole country position in the world if they get access to oil and the USA and Russia just want to make sure they have enough oil to live off of for the next 100 years
@@ajford-arausa8328Fair enough
Alaska is in the north like canada
I do not believe that Russia is a super power. I am not saying they are not, i just don't believe they are.
Not really. The US and Russia are the only powers that are able to "defend" and militarize such a place as big as the arctic. Norway and Canada are closer but they slash their military budget every chance they get, so I doubt they would be willing to create dedicated Arctic Force to be stationed in the region 24/7
correction. If the ice cap melts, it will not matter a didley shit on the water level. The ice cap is floating.
what about antarctca?
no one cares except maybe Argentina?
New Zealand cares.@@JamesSmith-ix5jd
In this fight for the north pole russia also claimed svalbard an internationally agreed upon norwegian island, and claimed that norways border should go at an angle to cut them of from the poles, and as such around 2010 russian fishermen were jailed after they fished in norway and refused to release the fish, to which a family of 4 was kidnapped in russia and russia said wanna trade...
Sounds like Russia is based af.
The pie idea makes the most sense to me. As for trade, the waters should be international territory for shipping lane purposes.
Greed my friend
Even though the pie idea is the best and most reasonable ...it will give Russia more than 50% of all the artic circle since more than 50% of the artic coasts are russian: most western countries will not agree with that!
There should not be "international waters" there as this will encourage criminal activities in a ressource reach region, also no one will feel particularly responsible for security, recue mission and ice breaking in the international waters which will negatively affect trade routes
FACT: Canadian Parlaiment, in response to the Russians North pole claim, issued Santa Claus a Canadian Passport! How can the North pole be Russian when Santa's Canadian eh? LMAO true story
I thought Santa lives in Finland
Russians have a Ded Moroz, Who lives in Velikiy Uglich
Russia don't believe in western Santa; Russia believes in Ded Moroz and Snegurochka.
Just goes to show what Canadians priorities are.
@@kiwitrainguy 🤣
Those countries are close to the artic and I wander why some countries far from Antarctica want a piece of that pie ?
awesome,,bro,,,
Natural resources.
Well the Arctic is the subject of common interest between Canada the United States and Russia for the resources they all want . But I don't think anyone can lay any sole dominant claims as it would lead to fighting for it. It's human nature among even the worlds most powerful leaders right?
It's such an important question and this is not a final answer to your ending question: But by reason's intuition, the proposed rules in this situation, the law of the sea, sound quite acceptable and could make the difference between an Arctic war and development of commercial, natural resource, eco-travel and such purposes. Arctic oil is valuable if harvested for market soon; But the trade route is probably more valuable. Right now, oil is black gold; But our cutting edge automotive science has calculated a new engineering paradigm for auto-transport: which is far safer and superior in every way, including resource and eco-efficiency that can't be carried out with petrol; Because petrol doesn't communicate with computer systems and sensors, unlike electricity which does so at the rapid pace required. That's one pincher coming for oil; the other is a cleft monster claw of immediate expanding nuclear fission, which is potentially far better business for Russia(or anyone else with the vision and intestines to 'Just Do It,' like Oregon's Nike) and imminent nuclear fusion through state funded firms like America's Helion Corporation. Since we started sinking taxpayer(American) R & D money in billions into nuclear fusion research, there's been an enormous scientific/industrial breakthrough, a holy grail physics sought for fifty years of serious research; till people thought it was like pirate treasure. We'll finish the job. In the short run, regular nuclear fission is a better investment than Arctic oil in my view; Russian companies go into willing countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka and set up nuclear fission plants and storage systems(not to mention all of China,) then a country goes from the masses of its population and countryside having no or little electricity(we will carry out this regime even in Africa; the Russians will stabilize these matters and employ locals and natives of said nations) to having unlimited, practically free power like France did before it grew a sissy streak; and it won't have any more melt-downs than France did; or Russia has in so many decades. Chernobyl was back in the dinosaur days; when the nuclear power tech was just being developed. But nuclear fusion is the ultimate answer; It goes in stages of industrial evolution.
Thanks,
If I is retreating why does every time a sub surfaces there is plenty of thick ice plus tems that are real cold. There is plenty of ICE on the Russian side too plus so many Polar Bears that Sarah Palin ought to be on speed dial.
This information on Arctic Area’s claims by concerned Nations like Russia. USA. Canada. Norway. Greenland. Denmark. Sweden etc is worth
Why is Britain laying claim to the Arctic when they clearly have no link there
Maybe Via Canada (Canada is part of the British Commonwealth). Just a maybe though.
Sedna/Caligo does
No other place on Earth has an ecosystem as ruled by that force of nature
This universe belongs to God Shiva.. with history of millions of years .. remaining all are known for only 2000 or 3000 yrs only .. dnt b foolish .. if u dig under ur place there u get any hindu symbolic only .. its 💯 true
Somple. Make the arctic its own territory, no one owns it, no one toucjes it with anything other than a ship, no drilling, no developing. Anyone using it pays a tariff to cross it
Whittier, Alaska
The real reason why Volka sale are going up 🥶
is this for high school dropouts?
I rather would like to know WY normal people are not allowed to go there if it belongs to no one
You are free to travel to Antarctic. It cost a lot, and is cold, dangerous and hostile. But go right ahead, nobody will stop you. Pro tip: go in the summer.
You guys are confusing the Arctic with the Antarctic @@Mosern1977
It is for oil that they fight
Surely it is international waters.
Finally, someone in these comments speaking some sense.
Who owns the Arctic? The guy with the most guns.
Nobody should be able to do anything in that area. That’s where the Crill are and everything without that the whole ego system will crash in the ocean.
Why I don't see Arabic country in Arctic ?
Whatever Arctic Treaty is signed, it should have a Santa Clause.
Make it a national park retaining it's untouched wilderness and the beauty of it's snow along with it's location on top of the world 👍
And Santa lives there among the polar bears.
As if russia is going to accept that when they can get more power.
Russia is stupid
I think you mean International Park. But when the ice is melted it becomes an open ocean just like all the other oceans.
People be looking for more money as if they would be alive to enjoy it damn humanity 😓
5 6 countries max where did you get 8 lmao
he pie agreement seems reasonable
Even if the Arctic ice melts, sea levels will not rise.
(Archimedes principle)
Because seawater is warmer and saltier than floating ice, changes in the amount of this ice are affecting global sea levels. Also if you do an experiment with a cup of water an ice, that experiment wont take into account the water level before the cup was filled with ice. If you did the same experiment with a cup of water that was almost full and then you added a big iceberg to it, it would squash over the top. Archimedes principle is formulated in terms of forces that are linked to weight or equivalent mass, not to volume. Melting sea-ice may cause small changes in sea level. The salt concentration in icebergs and sea-ice is less that of the seawater which holds it buoyant. So if sea-ice melts in the water, the local salt concentration, and hence the seawater density, decreases. To maintain a constant pressure at the bottom of the ocean, which is a fine assumption when considering the surrounding waters to be unchanged, one would (regionally) need a higher column of less dense water. The Archimedes argument breaks down there because of the density of the water does not remain constant throughout the melting process. Density changes also occur when the temperature of the seawater changes due to the latent heat needed to convert ice to water, essentially counteracting some of the above effects. So, the melting of icebergs a sea-ice could cause some sea-level change. However, this effect is expected to be smaller than the direct contribution of the grounded ice sources. There are a lot more icebergs being created because of ice flowing off of ice sheets, like Greenland or Antarctica. Because when you take ice from the land where there is a significant part of the mass that is above sea level and put that ice into the ocean, that raises the sea level. Besides the total amount of the non-floating Arctic and Antarctic ice is about 50 times higher, and because this is not currently floating (and displacing water), if it were all to melt the sea levels would rise significantly. The melting iceberg increase sea-level rise for a bit. But, how about a warmer condition? Of course, the volume bigger caused by expansion. It is more complicated when we also count the salinity factor. Yet, the biggest challenge comes from the effect of global warming itself.
Isn’t >50% of arctic population belongs to a single nationality?
The Antarctic nations are
Chile
Argentina
New Zealand
Australia
Madagaskar
South Africa + Lesotho (because they are an enclave, and it's not their fault)
Have I left out anyone, some island nations perhaps?
OK I forgot the UK because of the Falklands.
Russia, China,, etc should be only guests there IMO because the are not Antarctic nations. And Russia wants to control the Arctic...
53% of the Arctic is made up of russian territory and there are several russian islands far north in the artic region! Unlike the Scandinavian countries!!!
No Wonder why 53% of the Arctic belongs to Russia😀
Cool
As a Canadian I would sell it to anyone, it’s the worst place in the world.
The Russians will buy your share.
Russia.........veautiful......ilove...welcome......nice...💛💛💛💛💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💙💙💙💙💙💙💙♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️💚💚💚💚🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
Конечно Россия главная в арктике будет,в этом нет совмнений.У жругих стран не хватит возможностей просто.
At this point forks are actually happy for global warming because the ice is melting and is giving war for more resources
We all know that Santa Claus owns the arctic, he has a house up there 🎅🙃
They said artic will be ice free by the 2030s
Thats just an excuse in the west so you will pay higher taxes for the next 30years preparing to finnance a long war, in 2050 when the ice melts the arctic war will begin between NATO and Russia.
Well, during the Arctic Summers anyway.
6:07-6:17 ..The nerve of this guy!
Funny thing is about this ice, is that, IT'S JUST AS THICK AS IT WAS OVER A 1,000 YEARS AGO! Interesting that.
By the way, the polar bears up here are doing fine. Still looks like the middle of winter up here. its still quite cold even for April 2023.
To measure sea ice takes many factors, not only the thickness of ice but also the square mileage of these ice sheets each year, which is on a steady decline. As for Polar Bears they are far from fine. Many Polar bears have began migration south in search for food. As the hunt on ice sheets that are slowly depleting. This not only causes a threat to Polar Bears but also to human living in nothern countries where these bears are looking for new food sources. Threating humans and surrounding ecosystems that these bears and not naturally from.
@@ericschilling4567 I live up north! Enough said oh and even cougars come down to saskatchewan and manitoba above and below the 54 Parallel and the polar bears havce ALWAYS come into these regions, they were originally the Brown Bear and evolved INTO ----YES INTO our Climate!!! Your ignorance is amusing, Stop drinking the Kool-Aid! Have a great day!
PS The Ice is Fine and if it finally disappears thats is a GOOD thing! Just because humans decide to act as if this is against the laws of natures doesnt make it BAD! In fact we used to be far more tropical here before the POLAR SHIFTS!!! Now that we are currently under another SHIFT we shall get WARMER more WET more TROPICAL like weather however we will still get winter.
Climates happen every day. Get used toit.
Seriously there is nothing to panic about other then WEATHER WARS AND MAINIPULATION -- GEO Engineering. Corporate Propaganda. Military Corporations Like NASA, HAARP, DARPA. Military industrial complex, KLAUS SCHWAB- WEF, UN, NATO, WHO, IMF, World BANKERS aka FEDS etc
Using ICESat measurements, scientists found that overall Arctic sea ice thinned about 0.17 meters (7 inches) a year, for a total of 0.68 meters (2.2 feet) over four winters. The total area covered by the thicker, older "multi-year" ice that has survived one or more summers shrank by 42 percent.
@00:34 "While this is a risk to humans as a result of rising oceans.". This is simply not true, the melting of the arctic ice does not affect sea water level at all.
Wow cool
❤❤❤
Who owns the artic? Santa clause.
America should own all of it has their the most diverse liberty justice country in the world, GOD BLESS AMREICA
The US is going through their puberty as a nation, they should come back later when they learn to control their temper.
@@JamesSmith-ix5jd America is the best nation in world
Это раковая опухоль
😂😂😂
@@JamesSmith-ix5jd America has strong foundation , native Americans help build it strong along with blacks and whites we have all races here we are most powerful , yes we have trouble with each other but we heal those propblems and then we will be most United country this universe has ever seen.
I would have just installed an oil rig and surrounded it with the military, whoever wants to claim it can try to find out.
Russia
Own all of artiv
😢
as its not a land , no one owns it , we all share the arctic... end... the Antarctic is different its a land and has been claimed
Ice
Don’t let Russia get ahold of it
No 2 ways about that, it belongs to the Greenlandic people!!!
It well part is owned by inuient people living on the northern shores of Canada a lot of them are trained as army rangers because of there knoledge of the area they have saved so many people getting lost or surcoming to weather conditions and they patrol entire North of Canada Russia just wants anything that gets it closer to North America plus minerals money money at least the Eskimos keep it all natural and for ice if you look at James Bay North part of Manitoba the town of Churchill Manatoba gets surrounded by polar bears for the entire summer making a dangerous situation ice is taking longer and longer to freeze they even have the only polar bear prison in world for repeat offenders it's big business one of only taking tourists out to see them it's only accessible by plane or train no road but it's a good thing for people running tourist attractions but they constantly have polar bear patrols 24 hours a day never walk alone there have been a few people mauled or killed but it's because no food and they just look at us as food at least the bear jail keeps slot of bears from being shot and hold them for the summer and release in winter but the ice is going fast and longer to freeze again which eventually will push polar bears south looking for food
Polar Bears are the largest land predator.
Russia was not the owner of arctic but .....over thann 50 % area was russian military teritory , like or doesnt like its the reality happened on arctic
Oh Arctic 😅🇬🇱🇦🇶
Canada 🇨🇦 Denmark 🇩🇰 🇳🇴 USA owns while Russia 🇷🇺 official borders are Murmansk and enda near North Korea which is clear border
China wants this one too.
Canada needs to build our army and defend what's ours and take what we want!
Against Russia one of the biggest military in the world!
Go Canada!
Simple answear indiginous
And how would they be able to defend it?
With what money? With what equipment? What kind of defence does they have? 😏
"What kind of defence does they have?" - Walruses and Killer Whales.@@Realsvear
Russia🇷🇺
ВСЯ АРКТИКА ПРИНАДЛЕЖИТ РОССИИ!
Wrong lol. NATO covers 47% or the other half of the Arctic
I thinks it belongs to Canada 🇨🇦 & Russia 🇷🇺 with small USA portion attached to Canada & portion of Denmark. Canada still own most land mass " Islands near the arctic. Its simple : Canada would preserve it - Russia exploit it. I think Denmark 🇩🇰 🇺🇸 & Canada 🇨🇦need to create an arctic union for the 🌎 health.
The United States is not connected with the Arctic at all, we sold Alaska to them, let them continue to rejoice according to this logic, you can give the Arctic to the Greeks. In tsarist times, we have already been to the Arctic, but, unfortunately, we did not include it in our country.
If you sold Alaska to the USA then Alaska is part of the USA and so USA is connected to the Arctic.
Interesting how you Russians and Canadians consider the Arctic as a land when it will soon be ocean once the ice melts.
Antarctica is a solid continent and it belongs to New Zealand.😀😄🙂@@MaxAuto-yv6nr
You sea hear the reason thst 3th. Word war will happen
Раньше в Арктике была Великая Даария, она же Арктида, она же Ориана, она же Гиперборея. Там жили предки славян и ариев. После падения осколков Луны Лели на Мидгард Землю, наши предки переселились в течении 16 лет в Евразию (тогда Рассению). Это было 111 000 лет назад. Карты Великой Даарии повсеместно можно найти в интернете.
Русский тролль заткнись
@@robbie552 clown moment
@@robbie552 долго думал над ответом