The Race To Electrify America’s School Buses

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @sambishop1667
    @sambishop1667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    Even better than electric school busses is building our communities so that kids can walk or bike to school. It's not always possible, especially in existing neighborhoods, but it should be the default in new communities.
    I live in such a community, and it's great. Our children are more independent and active. And yes, we live in a place known for snow. But kids are tough if you give them the opportunity to be.
    We still have a few busses though, and I'd be happy if they were electric.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Most new neighborhoods in Florida are constructed like that, but kids should not have to spend a ton of time getting to school.

    • @austinhernandez2716
      @austinhernandez2716 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      It IS possible. Neighborhoods were bulldozed to build modern cities. Single family zoning was introduced. All of that can be reversed. It happened in the Netherlands.

    • @austinhernandez2716
      @austinhernandez2716 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@seanthe100 Well they do because of the way the city is. In other countries they can walk for like 10-20 minutes. They get daily exercise along with it. And they don't have to worry about any traffic, or a crazy bus driver.. Meanwhile some student in America have to ride the bus for 2 hours everyday! That was my experience most of my life in school.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@austinhernandez2716 I went to a school where literally everyone walked we only had one bus for the handicap so this really isn't the story for all of Americans.

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It technically is possible by allowing for multi family communities near schools.

  • @mannyechaluce3814
    @mannyechaluce3814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    EVs are perfect for public transport, the distances are set and they are not dependent on public charging.

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Trolley’s are better.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That doesn't work for school buses doign field trips or doubling up on runs.

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Unfortunately gvt. contracts go to the lowest bidder. Wait till one of those batteries catches fire.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep, the city of Shendzen in China at 11,000 electric buses!! - th-cam.com/video/0P7fTPLSMeI/w-d-xo.html

    • @TheRabbitHasLanded
      @TheRabbitHasLanded 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I work at one of the largest public university transit systems and our EV busses are honestly pretty trash. Supposed to be very nice but they are heavily restricted to certain routes due to poor charge and lack of range, very heavy too. Also the quietness of the bus is nice but can also be dangerous as there are many pedestrians who may not be paying attention.

  • @caitlinweiss8801
    @caitlinweiss8801 2 ปีที่แล้ว +151

    As a previous kid with asthma, I hated the bus because it often affected my lungs. The kids are gonna appreciate this so much.

    • @corbin8930
      @corbin8930 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Why would the bus impact your lungs any more than all the other vehicles on the road?

    • @Fr00stee
      @Fr00stee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@corbin8930 at least in my school you had to stand in front of like 10 buses all idling for 30 minutes and constantly breathe it in all the exhaust

    • @alb12345672
      @alb12345672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Diesel does have particulates, less so in newer engines, but hate to break the news but making batteries on that scale are not flowers and butterflies. Do your own research. You are just passing the buck to some other part of the planet. As much as they want economic growth in a remote part of Nevada they hesitate to mine there. Hopefully they find better ways.

    • @Medicineandlacrosse
      @Medicineandlacrosse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@alb12345672 still better than fossil fuels, not perfect but no serious EV advocate is unaware of the negative impacts of EVs. It’s really stupid logic to say “EVs aren’t perfect so we should continue using fossil fuels which are even worse”

    • @ari-jv
      @ari-jv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@corbin8930😂😂😂😂 ikr she sound Hella dumb

  • @zeph_os
    @zeph_os 2 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    I am very excited to see electrification in larger scale vehicle applications, but one point of anxiety I still have is the uncertainty of manufacturers making their vehicles repairable by anyone besides them. Tesla already makes me nervous with their withdrawal of service manuals and being very touchy about specific diagnostics, but without proper oversight, it's not a stretch to imagine the companies trying to hold school districts accountable for huge repair bills on problems they could otherwise easily solve

    • @trogdorstrngbd
      @trogdorstrngbd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This is a great point and I hope it stays near the top of the comments! A local government could easily get swindled by an experienced EV supplier into not checking for repairability and serviceability clauses, and once they've made the huge investment to convert most of their fleet they'll be locked in for years.

    • @thomasdriskill5254
      @thomasdriskill5254 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤡

    • @mendoblendo321
      @mendoblendo321 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah it's almost impossible to do repairs on Tesla unless you take it to Tesla

    • @nick0126
      @nick0126 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@trogdorstrngbd change the law governing access to manuals and parts, people have been working. on this for farm equipment for years. I guess John Deere has your complete respect already?

    • @CA-bw7mf
      @CA-bw7mf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can We Say wait for more Rolling Blackouts if they Electrify all vehicles because they can’t keep the lights on as it is with the Lakes drying up it’s a big pricey transition & the only people that will be gaining will be Brandon’s Circus us little people aren’t going to afford EVs school districts struggling to transport kids right now can’t afford these buses or setting up charging stations our government is just out of their minds

  • @cad4905
    @cad4905 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I think their also making Diesel Buses look bad btw. Like their examples of the Diesel buses of putting out lots of smokes and fumes isn't 100% true. Newer school buses with Diesel engines you can't smell the fumes at all. It's not like theses engines don't become efficient overtime. Just be informed that Diesel engine progress in efficiency over time just like regular car engines. Detroit Diesel made a 4-cylinder engine called the DD5 for buses and trucks. theses engines make the ride quiet especially on school buses. Also, you have the Cummins 6.7 ISB Engines that has been becoming more better overtime as years continues. You guys can't 100% say diesel engines are terrible, bad, and should be gone because guess what runs the engines? Semi-Trucks do, and they defiantly need them for milage and pulling loads around the states. The new Semi Trucks run cleaner btw with the new engines they had made. I don't think Eletric engines are bad for us or anything, I think it's a good thing. They have many benefits like being cheaper to recharge and since Deisel gas prices are very high still, they have their huge advantage there. But people need to remember that not ALL diesel engines are bad like they say because diesel engines are getting better at being efficient here just like gasoline car engines are getting better.

  • @baronvonjo1929
    @baronvonjo1929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    I think school busses are the perfect way to being electrification to areas. They aren't doing insanely long trips overall but probably could make a few capable of such because the busses are just so long and can have large batteries.
    And it might help bring infrastructure to areas. The vast majority of the US has absolutely no infrastructure.
    I have lots of concerns about EVs being able to be for mainstream buyers so many issues with it. However this seems to be a decent idea.

    • @Powerweights
      @Powerweights 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The thing is electronic vehicles work great in southern America. There is no way those batteries would last in Canada

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      School busses add .00002% of greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere.
      Meanwhile, the biggest causes are completely ignored.
      Absolute stupidity.

    • @kingofrivia1248
      @kingofrivia1248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You obviously havent gone on a EV roadtrip i was absolutely amazed how many chargers exist.

    • @Powerweights
      @Powerweights 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@kingofrivia1248 sounds like you live in a small area of the US or Canada where that exists. In -40 those batteries lose a ton in range or they lose efficiency way faster then those in more favourable parts

    • @Powerweights
      @Powerweights 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kingofrivia1248 yea because the batteries don’t hold up in the cold

  • @kevinmapes2873
    @kevinmapes2873 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    We have electric Thomas buses in our fleet. They cost 3X more than a Cummins, only have a range of less than 120 miles, power cost to charge exceeds diesel costs and we have had nothing but trouble with them. I don't recommend them to any district. We made a huge mistake.

    • @TSi99999
      @TSi99999 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But the virtue signaling is totally worth it! And no diesel smell!

    • @slik_
      @slik_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Have you considered looking for other manufacturers?

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's the price per kWh? And the price of diesel per L (or US gallon)?

    • @Reeseshead
      @Reeseshead 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My district is getting an electric Blue Bird and it has 120 something miles on it as well, can't wait to hear about the new stories. Tax payers are gonna get a treat with this one!!

    • @birbies
      @birbies 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TSi99999what is virtue signalling

  • @mnd3607
    @mnd3607 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Since school buses got massive roof and sitting idle most of the time..the manufacturers can try to install solar panels that would self charge the bus or get some additional range ..it would reduce the load on the grid ...

    • @darkgalaxy5548
      @darkgalaxy5548 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think it would take at least a couple of sunny summer days to bring the depleted batteries to fully charged with a solar panel the size of a bus roof.

    • @okn8t
      @okn8t ปีที่แล้ว

      @@darkgalaxy5548 The solar panels would be used more as a backup is what op was saying. In the instance that additional range would be needed.

    • @darkgalaxy5548
      @darkgalaxy5548 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@okn8t An unreliable power source as a backup is probably a bad idea.

    • @okn8t
      @okn8t ปีที่แล้ว

      @@darkgalaxy5548 That would depend on where you live of course. Maybe full electric will be in predominantly sunny climates and hybrid buses in regions with less sunny climate.

    • @darkgalaxy5548
      @darkgalaxy5548 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@okn8t Well, as long as the sun shines, it should work fine.

  • @easyrider3112
    @easyrider3112 2 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    97%+ of school buses would be way better and cheaper in the long run. There are a very small number of special exceptions, but just keep a few of the old diesels around for that and you are good.
    Replacing the remaining diesels with hybrid solutions would work as well, but you lose almost all the real savings to maintenance cost as they get older(5-10 years old)

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are 500,000 school buses operating in the USA. 45,000 in NY alone. Who's going to pay to replace them with considerably more expensive electrics? It's another liberal pipe dream.

    • @Reeseshead
      @Reeseshead 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are no hybrid solutions. The EPA kept changing the standards so the only hybrid school bus got discontinued within a few years.

  • @JohnS-er7jh
    @JohnS-er7jh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If you do not live in California, but you are buying a variety of different items shipped from California, you will be helping pay for those school buses (and other 'green' items as well). The State of California now charges an extra 'environmental' tax on items shipped from that state to customers located outside of California. This is an addition to your own state sales tax (if you have it). Once I noticed this extra fee, I stopped buying anything from California (I am already paying 7% Sales tax on purchases to my own state). Enough is a Enough.

  • @JogBird
    @JogBird 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    great, but, now fix the driver shortage

    • @ahmetdeniz4033
      @ahmetdeniz4033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look again, hint: ports

    • @dicktracy5234
      @dicktracy5234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Put cages on them like the prison bus and people would take the job .

    • @chiquita683
      @chiquita683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Self driving

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@dicktracy5234you would have to chain the kids up shackles

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chiquita683 no so soon

  • @foreverinteriors
    @foreverinteriors 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Given the shape of the average school bus - good, I'm not sure why new buses are being bought when conversion kits would be a simpler and more economical strategy

    • @AugustBanks
      @AugustBanks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chassis, seat, not motor equipment are all designed to last only so long.
      Conversion kits probably don't have substantial warranties and would be too varied.
      Power companies are investing in these school buses in heavy numbers so they can use them for grid storage and profit. Harder to implement unless the systems are uniform and compatible.
      There is so much more to this than just replacing a powertrain.

    • @foreverinteriors
      @foreverinteriors ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AugustBanks agreed to a certain extent. The chassis are typically good for 20 years. 5 to 10 for the first customer and the balance for the "poor" school that gets it next. There's over 20 companies getting into the school bus game. A few as manufacturers and the balance as conversion companies. There is always room.

  • @vijayrangarajanramakrishna318
    @vijayrangarajanramakrishna318 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very good initiative by US administration in the interest of cleaner and greener environment for future generations!!👏👍

  • @ExpeditionNomadicAdventures
    @ExpeditionNomadicAdventures ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Electrification of a school bus is a no-brainer, but seat belts and air conditioning would be ultimate upgrades for the health and safety of children riding school buses.

    • @tval8780
      @tval8780 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      As a school bus driver, I agree 100%.

    • @bryancurdi2318
      @bryancurdi2318 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      School buses do have seat belts but you're not required to wear it because school buses are actually safe. I do agree that some buses need better air conditioning, but some have pretty good air conditioning, because of where they're placed.

    • @LegoWormNoah101
      @LegoWormNoah101 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @CaptainSpaceMan98 the seats are heavily cushioned. Forward or rear impact, the kids will hit that soft material and the forces will be absorbed. As for A/C, just [REDACTED] open the window!

    • @twisterman101new4
      @twisterman101new4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bryancurdi2318 Actually false. During a crash test with crash dummies, (and data taken from it.), Most Buses do not have seatbelts and those without them are more likely to have a fatal or a bad consequences compared to seatbelt buses.

    • @twisterman101new4
      @twisterman101new4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@LegoWormNoah101 Sure, However nothing is stopping them from being flung sideways, or hitting the roof during severe crashes or T-Boned Accidents.

  • @Wolf462
    @Wolf462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    This is fine for school districts in wealthier urban settings but it will take a loooong time for the price to come down enough for smaller rural schools to afford these. School budgets have been on the decline across the board and you heard that one lady say that her affluent school district would need a rather large budget increase going forward. These are not yet practical at all.
    Not only the price, but rural areas tend to have much longer routes and the battery life becomes a serious limiting factor especially when considering the sports teams of these schools that often times must travel many hundreds of miles away.
    Furthermore, lack of infrastructure and trained mechanics to keep this type of fleet operational make these busses a pipe dream in most places for decades to come.
    Great idea though. Let’s keep moving forward on this.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Just like electric cars, unaffordable. My diesel International has such good pollution devices you can put your nose to the tailpipe and smell nothing. No smoke, either.

    • @kensmechanicalaffair
      @kensmechanicalaffair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@1940limited A Ford, lol.

    • @Wolf462
      @Wolf462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@1940limited I agree but the EV’s will get better and cheaper in time. I think people often forget that we have been perfecting the internal combustion engine since the 1860’s.
      Innovations sometimes take time but eventually they will become more efficient and cheaper as we refine the tech and perhaps have a breakthrough or two.

    • @Bobrogers99
      @Bobrogers99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As you point out, many school districts are struggling to fund their basic services, so they can only afford the least expensive transportation. And they'd need to have several longer-range buses for away games and field trips. It will be quite a few years before electric school buses become sufficiently affordable and have the range to interest my district.

    • @antiantiderivative
      @antiantiderivative 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@1940limited You admitting to sniffing poison explains your comment pretty well.

  • @daveizdebski
    @daveizdebski ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bruh hearing the diesel school bus around the corner was so awesome bc you knew the trip was starting and you'd be leaving school in just a moment 😂

  • @jeffery1855
    @jeffery1855 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I wish more schools would offer bussing for families around the country. I didn’t get to have that experience growing up, but I think electric busses are a great way for kids to get a ride to school!

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Trust me, you don't want to pay the freight for electrics.

    • @antiantiderivative
      @antiantiderivative 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1940limited Still way better than poisoning kids as they wait to go to school

    • @DestinRugers.S
      @DestinRugers.S ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1940limited Yea, electrics thrive in these niches, and excel in short commutes...

  • @empirestate8791
    @empirestate8791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Pretty much all commercial vehicles should be electrified (especially in logistics). They don't travel particularly long distances but make frequent stops and require a lot of torque because they carry heavy loads. School buses, construction equipment, delivery vans, garbage trucks, and similar commercial vehicles can all run brilliantly on battery power. Would also do a lot to reduce noise and air pollution, and I would imagine maintenance would be a lot cheaper as well.

    • @fyou4641
      @fyou4641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      problem with logistics and ev`s are: the batteries weigh a ton and don't really weigh less empty so for a truck your lugging around a few ton off batteries. so you can transport less so you need more trucks and the most expensive part of it you need to pay more drivers. maybe if they get the sulfur battery`s in production(almost double the energy density of lithium cobalt) it may work out. only part where you can effectively use EV is the last few miles like the parcel delivery service in city`s but for the bulk litium-cobalt battery`s are just too heavy. what could work with current tech is powerlines above the mainly used highways th-cam.com/video/_3P_S7pL7Yg/w-d-xo.html&t

    • @larrywilson634
      @larrywilson634 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@deanvanluven6813that 300 gallons of diesel costs about $1000. Electricity to charge the battery around $300. So you lose $700 every time you fill up.

    • @byronchavarria4954
      @byronchavarria4954 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No Gas Cars Are Better Who Cares About Glaciers

    • @nick0126
      @nick0126 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fyou4641 ahhh, but those heavy batteries lower the center of gravity a lot and make the buses inherently more safe. BTW, battery tech is changing faster than you can read about it... murphy's law is in full play

    • @5353Jumper
      @5353Jumper ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Combine electric commercial vehicles with solar & wind commercial rooftops and parking lot covers to basically eliminate all the "but the grid cannot handle it" comments as well as make the fleets even more cost effective.
      Anything that reduces demand for fuels and also reduces the dependency on the grid monopoly is all good.

  • @CLMDADE
    @CLMDADE 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Can't even afford books and others supplies, but buses are the priority.

  • @ytb3748
    @ytb3748 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    What they should really electrify first are those grocery transport trucks. They have fixed determined routes between the warehouse and the grocery stores

    • @provoschoolbus
      @provoschoolbus ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You literally made the point of the video. School buses have fixed routes. And they are a much bigger fleet than grocery transport trucks.

    • @ytb3748
      @ytb3748 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@provoschoolbus True, but the reason why I prioritized transport trucks is because they travel longer distances and they have much bigger engines that pollute more

  • @FinancialShinanigan
    @FinancialShinanigan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Happy to see more electric NJ Transit buses during my NYC commute!

  • @electro_sykes
    @electro_sykes ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well, having a bunch of kids in a diesel bus is still better for the environment than having their parents drive them all into school in their own petrol/Diesel Powered Cars

  • @Blank00
    @Blank00 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Have any big schoolbus manufacturers made hybrid schoolbuses?

    • @kensmechanicalaffair
      @kensmechanicalaffair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's a good question.

    • @jermainec2462
      @jermainec2462 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking the same thing

    • @rosedinh5990
      @rosedinh5990 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      have make propan schoolbuses

    • @TellurideS13
      @TellurideS13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hybrid school buses was a thing a few years ago. It didn't work out.

    • @benjamin7114
      @benjamin7114 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Electric is where the money is at.

  • @DanielPennybaker
    @DanielPennybaker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Instead of focusing on the transportation to our public schools we should focus on the quality of our education. +$400,000 per is way too much. Don’t be an early adopter and just wait another few years.

    • @pranaym3859
      @pranaym3859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol, since when Americans have budget limit

    • @fyou4641
      @fyou4641 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pranaym3859 The only place USA has no budget limits is corn subsidies and the army

    • @TSi99999
      @TSi99999 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah all the teachers are quitting due to the low pay but let's triple the bus cost! And how much are the battery chargers that can handle a fleet?

    • @bigdiesel9411
      @bigdiesel9411 ปีที่แล้ว

      If the government eliminated the unnecessary concerns of Ukraine and refocused funds to our infrastructure funding for social services for born Americans would improve the available resources for those who contribute to the tax base.

  • @5688gamble
    @5688gamble 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine if the battery catches fire! Can't we build walkable neighbourhoods? Electrification should mean erecting overhead wires on well-used bus, truck and rail routes, not cramming batteries into everything!

  • @my2cents395
    @my2cents395 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    These buses need solar roofs and to be connected to the grid when not in use.

    • @RobbyBesch
      @RobbyBesch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah, or a solar canopy (less expensive and cheaper to integrate) over the bus parking lot

    • @codybrown9401
      @codybrown9401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Elon addressed that and said the solar tech is not advanced enough for solar roofs on any vehicle to make a difference on range.

    • @SicSemperTyrannisx9
      @SicSemperTyrannisx9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No. Schools need these to be as simple as possible. More parts means more maintenance . Solar roofs won’t add much additional capacity, and tying them into the grid would require a grid tie inverter. It would all be abandoned in 5 years.

    • @bilo6832
      @bilo6832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably not a cost effective solution. I think it would be better for the schools to install rooftop solar. Power generation and bus charging requirements would be matched well.

    • @mannyechaluce3814
      @mannyechaluce3814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would take 2 months to charge up batteries on a vehicle like this with solar. Think a small garden solar light takes 2 days to fully charge, your phone takes at least 5 days to charge by Solar :D a bus has millions of the same battery you have on your phone :D

  • @retrogamer2548
    @retrogamer2548 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how fast he accelerates around children.

  • @tmastersat
    @tmastersat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How many have caught on fire

  • @tyreesthomas5807
    @tyreesthomas5807 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nah I love that hot start from diesel

    • @PyroShields
      @PyroShields 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nobody cares what you like.

  • @keeler1160
    @keeler1160 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Honestly it was really nasty approaching all the busses after school to find your bus. All the busses together idling releasing that nasty smell can be harmful to students. I hope the electric busses make a better difference.

    • @tval8780
      @tval8780 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In California, school bus is not allowed to idle while waiting for students at the school bus ramp, on school zone and/or residential area.

    • @CA-bw7mf
      @CA-bw7mf ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I rode school buses & drove school buses their required at the School to shutoff the bus when loading & unloading students as for the stink they weren’t that bad wait til your taxes go up to pay for them new EVs

    • @CA-bw7mf
      @CA-bw7mf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tval8780 True it’s like that pretty much every School District not just California I used to drive School Bus in Texas & New Mexico they both required shutoff at the school loading or unloading

    • @jjk2one
      @jjk2one ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CA-bw7mf People don't have a clue what this "clean" energy really is. They will believe what ever they are told.

    • @CA-bw7mf
      @CA-bw7mf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jjk2one it isn’t clean it’s all about Power & making us do what the Government wants

  • @AsianDrag0n
    @AsianDrag0n ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I do like these new school buses. At the same time, I see no issue with the old diesel buses. Id argue that the old diesel smell is what makes them kinda cool. I also believe that these buses wont make alot of sense in more rural areas.

  • @RamBo-yh3kz
    @RamBo-yh3kz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    135 Miles range? That is less than 1/3 of Tesla Semi which is 500 Miles.

    • @bigdiesel9411
      @bigdiesel9411 ปีที่แล้ว

      Loaded is more like 250 to 300 miles. The technology is getting better.

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      Range is determined by battery size and efficiency. If the route is less than 100 miles, who cares? There's no free lunch. More range is heavier and costs more $

  • @DonSchricker
    @DonSchricker 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great progress. I saw a comment that i,t would be nice for kids to walk. I did for the first 3.5 years of my grade school. Now, I worry dangers to kids are too great for walking. It is terrible to think this way but this is our society now.

  • @列車お宅ティム
    @列車お宅ティム 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I think hybrid would be a better option. You get the benefit of regenerative braking, less noise and less battery size which helps with less rare earth materials used and less CO2.

    • @erikk77
      @erikk77 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can have regenerative braking with all electric. Hybrid means using an internal combustion engine that produces CO2. (More that all electric)

    • @sybsygstgstsgysg5330
      @sybsygstgstsgysg5330 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@erikk77 what does more all that electric mean

    • @GeeksGets
      @GeeksGets ปีที่แล้ว

      Less CO2 yet not none

    • @sybsygstgstsgysg5330
      @sybsygstgstsgysg5330 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GeeksGets electric cars are still bad for the environment so

    • @GeeksGets
      @GeeksGets ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sybsygstgstsgysg5330 these are buses...

  • @AllieThePrettyGator
    @AllieThePrettyGator ปีที่แล้ว

    0:39 i love that version

  • @razredge68
    @razredge68 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This would be fine for cities and rural areas with mostly flat routes. These would not be able to handle the routes that have very steep hills and take over an hour to drive due to the limited battery capacity.

    • @club6525
      @club6525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I would expect EVs to perform better due to high motor torque. Their range should also exceed that of diesel unless the companies is really cheaping out, at least 1100kkm.

    • @paulmentzer7658
      @paulmentzer7658 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then on such steep hills go with overhead cables. Trolley buses have used such cables for decades and being electric drive able to take on Hills to steep for diesel powered vehicles. In many open pit mines such electric drive trucks are common, given the greater torque produced with an electric engine.

    • @MarloSoBalJr
      @MarloSoBalJr ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think the concern is during those brutal Summers and putrid Winters.
      One is the battery overheating/overused and the other is premature battery draining due to the cold.
      Hill climbs is a non-factor IMHO

  • @gbrianjohnson
    @gbrianjohnson ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People our electric grid cant handle this. How do you expect the power grid to support this?

  • @-Rishikesh
    @-Rishikesh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I remember cnbc making a video 5 years back highlighting how polluting and old the current school buses are and hinted that electric buses make the perfect sense because of predictable routes and no hurry charging required because you have more than 3 hrs to charge them between the morning and evening trips. It's good to see atleast some progess in this area, but slapping on an electric motor and battery and not changing the aerodynamic designs seem sloppy and somewhat lazy.. hope the school buses get redesigned for better efficiency..

    • @willitbreak5825
      @willitbreak5825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Precisely. We need a ground-up design for a new bus, but this is a good first step.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Who at CNBC drives, maintaines, or pay for electric school buses? I love the "experts" who really know nothing about the subject sprouting their views to gullible audiences.

    • @MarloSoBalJr
      @MarloSoBalJr ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willitbreak5825 Low-floor is the way to go. I keep hearing from "experts" that high floor is safer yada-yada but inner-city buses tend to have lower fatality rates in accidents (by a large margin) than standard truck-chassis school buses.
      Rather it's the seating layout is the reason for not switching or something else, your suggestion is a good one to ask

  • @ybunnygurl
    @ybunnygurl ปีที่แล้ว

    What's interesting is that this is Fairfax county who has some of the oldest buses in the school bus fleet in the state of Virginia.

  • @enriquemercedes9519
    @enriquemercedes9519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The electric school bus is a good idea but I wonder if it will be sustainable or a cost burden for schools if school budgets gets cut.

    • @MarloSoBalJr
      @MarloSoBalJr ปีที่แล้ว

      That's two things that tends to get brush aside a lot by municipalities.
      If they're committed then the budget should flex towards fleet electrification over road/utility repairs OR how can the grid handle that extra overload. Then the disposing process after these buses reach their limit.

    • @erikk77
      @erikk77 ปีที่แล้ว

      The overall average cost to drive an electric vehicle is extremely low compared to diesel. A diesel engine has an efficiency of about 55%, the rest is wasted as heat and parasitic losses in the gearbox. Electric vehicles have an efficiency of about 75% and have no gear boxes. A passenger car costs about $0.20 per mile, electric car about $0.08 per mile.

    • @sunnydelight3046
      @sunnydelight3046 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pay the teachers less I guess

  • @thisismycoffee
    @thisismycoffee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does this change how the US sources electricity? The EIA states that 20% of energy consumption was renewable in 2021, meaning 80% of the electric for these buses would be sourced from natural gas, coal, and nuclear.

    • @ee-ef8qr
      @ee-ef8qr ปีที่แล้ว

      It means one less problem when we switch to renewables.

  • @Interglacial_optimist
    @Interglacial_optimist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now if they can provide electric bicycles to all of the students and staff then they won't need the buses except for the students who cannot operate a bicycle or walk to school.

  • @broderickgillum8854
    @broderickgillum8854 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Electric vehicles is the future I'm a owner of a Nissan Leaf 🍃 2012 it time

  • @senorbautista6143
    @senorbautista6143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    That’s a great idea! Also, if a kid doesn’t behave well, the seat should send an electric shock so Timmy learns to behave. Bam 💥 bus driver shortage solved as well.

    • @bhaskard8405
      @bhaskard8405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can use the shock therapy on DIESEL busses too, but I see what you are getting at

  • @pilotma
    @pilotma ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It would've been way cooler if they upgraded the other stuff of the bus too, like it make it more modern.

    • @PyroShields
      @PyroShields ปีที่แล้ว

      finally a great comment. If you notice the bus is not redesigned, its really a regular bus converted to electrical.

  • @andrewferrauiolo4618
    @andrewferrauiolo4618 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    This is cool. A good step forward. The old school buses need to be taken out.

    • @tira2145
      @tira2145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      California is begging there residents not to use electricity during the day, in order not to crash the whole electric grid. Where's all this new power coming from?
      Electric vehicles are a good thing, but I think that we are pushing them to fast.

    • @andrewferrauiolo4618
      @andrewferrauiolo4618 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tira2145 Well, the problem is, this country refuses to put money into infrastructure. They choose to put money into wars and political campaigns. Stop giving money to war profiteers.

    • @tira2145
      @tira2145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrewferrauiolo4618 I agree 100 percent. Our leaders put money in the wrong area's.
      That doesn't change the fact that the entire electric grid is maxed out most days. I'm a big fan of new technology like EVs, but if we adopt them to fast, there is a risk of power rationing, which could really stop the use of more EVs.

    • @mannyechaluce3814
      @mannyechaluce3814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      with or without children inside?

    • @andrewferrauiolo4618
      @andrewferrauiolo4618 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mannyechaluce3814 what?

  • @isaac198428
    @isaac198428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The public school system is the perfect platform for electrification. At least to see how good or bad the technology can get before rolling out in the masses. Local county government also needs such vehicles like meter readers, mail service, code enforcement, road engineers/public works who have their vehicles idling for hours by the road construction sites with lights flashing.

  • @Bilal_1860
    @Bilal_1860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing. Why don't they put solar panels on the bus roof though? Is that not feasible?

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      Adds weight. Just put the solar panels over the parking lot and they can keep charging batteries all the time and be tied into the grid

  • @rosstocher
    @rosstocher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quebec's success paid for by Alberta

  • @beamngbois
    @beamngbois ปีที่แล้ว +1

    DAM I LOVE DIESEL BUSS THEY SMELL GREAT

  • @privatemale27
    @privatemale27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Good to hear about the growth.... Maybe I'll be able to get a used electric bus to convert some day.... Definitely prefer that to gas. Plenty of roof space for solar, so if you are parking for a day or two of recharge time between longer drives, you should be indefinitely good to go without gas.

    • @EvanCalder
      @EvanCalder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Solar on the roof of a car generally will net you about 3mi/day in perfect conditions. Sure it's a big bus roof, but it's also a big bus to push so that number is probably not too far off. If you took the cost of solar panels, an inverter and installation which could easily be $5-10k and instead used that money to buy a bigger battery, you'd get a way more practical option. You could easily get 20 miles or more of range for that kind money.
      It seems like a really cool idea, but the math says it's best to put solar panels on structures and big batteries in vehicles.

    • @sybsygstgstsgysg5330
      @sybsygstgstsgysg5330 ปีที่แล้ว

      There’s a pretty small percentage of gas buses, most are diesel, and how are you gonna convert an electric bus to electric?

    • @privatemale27
      @privatemale27 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sybsygstgstsgysg5330 People often convert buses into RVs.

    • @sybsygstgstsgysg5330
      @sybsygstgstsgysg5330 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@privatemale27 I thought you were saying you were gonna convert an electric bus to electric

  • @smorris281
    @smorris281 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most districts can’t even hope to afford them. A lot of rural districts near me just got propane buses, they are cleaner burning and more cost effective than diesel.

  • @redknightsr69
    @redknightsr69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    All of this could have been avoided if we had built better cities with better planning. If kids have the ability to walk or bike to school we wouldn't need these big yellow blocks of cheese, or maybe as many of them as we do now. People wonder why the United States is becoming so expensive to live in

    • @ain92ru
      @ain92ru 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I'm from Europe and I remember riding a minibus to school as a thirdgrader. But your proposal requires fixing unnatural American zoning to allow building low-rise multi-family homes (and preferably mixed-use buildings) in current single-family districts, which NIMBYs aren't gonna allow to happen (not least because of racism)

  • @richardc6038
    @richardc6038 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to see how they Run when it cold out -0 F weather ! What if there is a power failed and the bus don't get charge ! No one want to talk about that

  • @bigbadjohn2543
    @bigbadjohn2543 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I saw a fast charging station near a Home Depot. I started taking pictures and was requested to leave the property. They were using natural gas fuel for Onan generators. Today there area cinder block walls around these units. Yep definitely a cleaner way to keep Americans moving.

    • @sethfroman7044
      @sethfroman7044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Natural gas is far greener than diesel… I think it’s like 60% cleaner. Not perfect, but much better for environment and a jumping off point.

    • @bigbadjohn2543
      @bigbadjohn2543 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sethfroman7044 This is true, however it's still using fossil fuels. The whole idea is to stop using these types of fuels. Where I live, new homes are no longer allowed natural gas. But I can buy an older home and install a gas furnace. It's all golfed up

    • @sethfroman7044
      @sethfroman7044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bigbadjohn2543 ohhh I agree with you there. Our green energy is ass backwards. Natural gas isn’t our silver bullet or a future solution. It’s a bandaid and hopefully ONLY a stepping stone to better and cleaner energy.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's why Teslas are called "coal powered cars."

    • @PK-tt5kk
      @PK-tt5kk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@bigbadjohn2543 well that will change in the future. U cant change everything instantly.

  • @patricknevermind8529
    @patricknevermind8529 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you're area floods then you shouldn't buy these busses.

  • @cmdr1911
    @cmdr1911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Well planned routes, relatively short routes, longer duration between uses and lower maintenance. School busses are one of the vehicles that makes sense. There is also no shortage of space of batteries if you need range. Could also scale to have few dedicated to longer routes for sports of field trips, but at some point you may be able to charter a bus if needed

    • @dman1908
      @dman1908 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some buses drive over 100 miles a day for a route, usually mine can be, especially when doing during or after school field trips, sometimes both. Also many drivers park their buses at home where I am, wonder where those drivers would plug their buses in at, especially ones that park on the side of the street.

    • @Reeseshead
      @Reeseshead 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah wait until you hear how the mechanic has to go fish for the bus 3 hours away LOL

  • @edthelazyboy
    @edthelazyboy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've looked into buying an EV before I gave up after I found out how expensive they are to own. Even for a sedan, there is about a $20K cost premium for the EV over the gas counterpart. On top of that, I have to invest even more to upgrade my electrical system and install a charging station. After 10 years, I will still not have broken even and will be left with a dead battery that will be very expensive to replace. If you look at most EV offerings, they tend to skew towards the luxury market. Even Kia / Hyundai, the cheap car brand, are making their EVs more premium than their gasoline offerings to target the luxury market. Clearly, EVs are not practical from an economics standpoint. They are a luxury, toys for the rich.
    How are school districts going to deal with the extra expense of running a fleet of electric buses when many are already financially constrained and struggle already to cover necessary expenses? How will they deal with the costs to upgrade their electrical systems and installation of charging stations? How will they deal with the massive expense of replacing the batteries when they die in ten years? I only see electric busses working in rich neighborhoods with strong tax payer base and residents who have the privilege to care about air / noise pollution.

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      My 2018 Nissan LEAF cost $26k. Not much different from a Honda Civic or Toyota Camry. It cost me $25 for a 40A circuit breaker and $80 for the inspection. The maintenance costs have been $0 and the battery is under warranty for 8 years or 100,000 miles. Electricity costs 1/10 what gas costs. Plus, it's fully charged and ready to go every day. No more gas stations or oil changes

  • @byronchavarria4954
    @byronchavarria4954 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Tesla Should Make An Electric School Bus And Coach Bus Because Tesla Is The King Of Electrification

    • @smartyyoung7319
      @smartyyoung7319 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And have complete monopoly to ruin the entire industry?

  • @farhanabdulhamid4214
    @farhanabdulhamid4214 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow wow wow wow good Tnx

  • @cliffcorson4000
    @cliffcorson4000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The issues are that these are draws on power grids that already are stretched
    Some states that are making it mandatory have the worse grids there

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a liberal pipe dream detached from reality as is usually the case on the left.

    • @PK-tt5kk
      @PK-tt5kk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      they will charge in the nigh when no usage is low

    • @cliffcorson4000
      @cliffcorson4000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1940limited not really
      It's a good concept but it sees a "benefit" without seeing full cost
      Look at how CFLs were supposed to be good. Yes they are more efficient than incandescent bulbs yet they contain mercury and those with migraines can be affected by them

    • @cliffcorson4000
      @cliffcorson4000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PK-tt5kk if you watched the video they have to charge them twice during the day just to complete their routes

  • @crisyar3
    @crisyar3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hybrids would be a better option in my opinion. They’re cleaner that diesel & take less to fill up but oh well. The progress to electrification should take much more time. I think we’re all going into this way too fast.

  • @ninjanerdstudent6937
    @ninjanerdstudent6937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They should totally install solar panels on the roof.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      not worth it

    • @5353Jumper
      @5353Jumper ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On the roof of the school or the bus barn maybe.

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solar panels should be installed over the parking lot at the bus depot. That way they can charge batteries all day long and be tied into the grid. No need to haul them around on the buses

  • @bm8641
    @bm8641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Neat but I have a question. Why is a race to electrify these buses? They run twice a day.

    • @drquinnmedicinewoman7786
      @drquinnmedicinewoman7786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      everyone is woke in California , they want things now now now!

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it has been proven local air pollution affects children's brain development and adds to increased asthma rates - good enough reason?

  • @asiandavidp
    @asiandavidp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think electric school bus is great. It's just a little hazard because it's quite and these days kids have headphones on and will not be aware of surroundings. Maybe put a speaker outside to mimic engine noise ??

    • @FGOKURULES
      @FGOKURULES 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      DOT mandates this on all EVs to make a artificial noise when reversing

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      One manufacturer already has the bus programmed to play music below 15 MPH. The kids hate it. It drives everyone crazy.

  • @danielkosciuszko9788
    @danielkosciuszko9788 ปีที่แล้ว

    In Europe kids take public transport to school but American cities are designed to be car centric. That’s the heart of the problem. I used to teach outside of NYC and would take the same bus as some of my students. The school of 2000 students didn’t have to pay a cent of their own gas guzzling busses.

  • @markplott4820
    @markplott4820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Schoolbuses should have went 100% Eletric back in 2000's .

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      battery prices were too high then but are now around 80% cheaper than 10 years ago but this still makes them 3x the cost of a normal school bus! - it just wouldn't have been viable.

    • @andrewdiamond2697
      @andrewdiamond2697 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markreed9853 I think the 3x thing is a scam - or that can be fixed by scaling. The drivetrain and battery storage should really only be maybe $30k more than the diesel equivalent, given the cost savings by not having a diesel drivetrain and transmission, which isn't free either.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewdiamond2697 scaling will definitely help but they still need to recover the money spent on R&D, and new factories and processes. It took years before Tesla made a profit.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrewdiamond2697 no, you're looking at least $30,000 per 100Kwh battery pack so with these buses probably got around 400 kWh batteries, there is a $120,000 already.

    • @andrewdiamond2697
      @andrewdiamond2697 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markreed9853 These buses should be able to run about 2 kWh per mile - so at a range of 130 miles, that would be 260 kWh. Battery prices these days are down to about $100 per kWh as raw batteries so that would be $26,000. From there add in another $10k for the drive unit and maybe another $10k for cooling and getting the batteries into a pack format. So now I'm at $46k. Now take credit for a Cummins diesel engine and Allison Transmission and I get to $30k.
      A 100 kWh replacement pack from Tesla, already in a pack format, is under $20k. Even if I bought three of these from Tesla and then bought the drive unit and cooling system, at most I would have a $70k difference from the diesel. That's nowhere near the quarter million quoted in this story.

  • @johnsmith1882-x2i
    @johnsmith1882-x2i 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The motor on the bus goes brrrrrrr

  • @seanwhitehall4652
    @seanwhitehall4652 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Perfect vehicle to remove exhaust on. Also, frequent stops will make regenerative braking useful.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited ปีที่แล้ว

      Remove exhaust then watch it burst into flames.Yes, perfect vehicle.

  • @philliphsieh83
    @philliphsieh83 ปีที่แล้ว

    Efficiency is the key to the future.

  • @1940limited
    @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Would be nice if Thomas and Blue Bird could learn how to build decent buses. We have them both in our fleet and have for years. The driver ergonomics are horrible and they break down constantly, even the new ones.

    • @kensmechanicalaffair
      @kensmechanicalaffair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Technicians have to eat. It's made to break.

    • @MarloSoBalJr
      @MarloSoBalJr ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They've been built cheap and 💩 sense I was a kid. Include International to that list as well with that nasty MaxxForce engine (pollutes like a chain smoking aunt).
      The only good buses I have ever ridden & driven were from Freightliner.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarloSoBalJr I remember as a kid in the early 60s Thomas bodies not being as comfortable as Ward. I have a 7 year old International CE300 and love it.

    • @chrisstarlitvagabond1496
      @chrisstarlitvagabond1496 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's the great thing about electric motors: they are incredibly simple and not prone to breaking down!

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chrisstarlitvagabond1496 Right. They just burst into flames, or the batteries do.

  • @GoldenTV3
    @GoldenTV3 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Plus they can charge at schools in the time period waiting for the last class to end instead of relying on diesel stations.

  • @chiquita683
    @chiquita683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    People are so stupid when they ask where does electricity come from? It comes from the sun and wind, it's 100% clean energy and renewable by just leaving the cars outside. Stay hurt with your $15 gas or whatever it costs. Clean electricity is what we living for the modern age

    • @caitlinweiss8801
      @caitlinweiss8801 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Investing in solar or other ways of energy now is going to save us so much money in the long run.

    • @marmedalmond9958
      @marmedalmond9958 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why don't you try tell this to the JDM fans. Directly?

    • @zunedog31
      @zunedog31 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Solar and wind have been in development for many decades. Very little applicable purpose has emerged in spite of untold billions spent.

    • @tira2145
      @tira2145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So your fine with children slave's digging up the needed my minerals in Africa? Not in your neighborhood, so it doesn't effect you.
      Lithium mining is not green either. Huge environmental damage.

    • @baronvonjo1929
      @baronvonjo1929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      These products are very destructive to mine and definitely not clean or good for the workers who do it.
      And most of these resources come from places like China.
      This while thing with Russia and gas shows how you can not have important resources to your economy be at the whims of a hostile nation.
      They can certainly be a option but they aren't perfect. We need multiple sources. It won't be sunny and windy every day.
      And honestly nuclear is the better solution than wind and solar.

  • @PPE707
    @PPE707 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    400k a bus. Goodness !

    • @kensmechanicalaffair
      @kensmechanicalaffair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No way.

    • @Reeseshead
      @Reeseshead 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah 3 times the normal price and guess who gets to pay for it and it's maintenence!!!

  • @jamram9924
    @jamram9924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    With the empty space on the roof, wouldn’t installing a few additional panels reduce charging times. Help with drawing less power from the onboard batteries…🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      solar would add very little to range as the electric motors are so powerful and batteries so big! - its just not worth it.

    • @Network126
      @Network126 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could easily fit over a thousand watts of solar on top.

    • @ThePilotGear
      @ThePilotGear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      definitely a good idea, with all the surface area. With schoolbuses, I think the biggest issue is cost though, and solar panels wouldn't be bringing that down.

  • @jeromep3182
    @jeromep3182 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like having both electric and also diesel. The electric has their benefits however for me I love my diesel Thomas rear engine especially for long field trips going places I crank it up and just go.

  • @MarloSoBalJr
    @MarloSoBalJr ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've always loved the smell of diesel on those morning field trips to wake me up 🤣 ...but I agree wholeheartedly to electrify school buses.
    More sustainable but the issue, as always, is gonna be how we are going to dispose of these EVs once they reach their end life. Then the long-term overload of the power grid.
    I guess that's a concern later on.

    • @CA-bw7mf
      @CA-bw7mf ปีที่แล้ว

      Call Kamala & Brandon on that question oh don’t forget the EPA Secretary too

    • @chrisstarlitvagabond1496
      @chrisstarlitvagabond1496 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CA-bw7mf Electricity use already grows year over year, electric vehicles are just going to increase that growth. So we'll build more power plants to accommodate that greater growth. It's far from unsolvable.

  • @bikesarebest
    @bikesarebest ปีที่แล้ว

    Love to see Quebec at the forefront

  • @gde1989
    @gde1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do the school buses have to be truck based? I would imagine there would be added weight due to the platform used which would have an effect on range. I also see none seem to be disability accessible, wouldn't a low floor European style bus be more cost effective and efficient?

    • @ain92ru
      @ain92ru 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, these conventional cabs may have made sense as a cost-saving measure (as truck chassis are cheaper) on roomy suburban roads where COE has less of an advantage but they are becoming ridiculous for engineless vehicles that doesn't have anything under the hood at all!
      But I guess when school bus companies will have to compete with regular bus manufacturers, they may quickly go out of business since the the latter have so much better economy of scale

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah, Coming from the UK I always found the US school bus design very strange, here kids use public transport buses mostly, so suitable for the disabled as well.

    • @gde1989
      @gde1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Mark Reed same as here in Australia, conventional low floor buses

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gde1989 saying that our coaches have a high floor and carry more people so that's one reason maybe?

    • @Kodiak_Brown_Bear
      @Kodiak_Brown_Bear ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thats mostly because School buses must meet up to certain safety requirements before being able to driving on the roads in the U.S.

  • @FaTCaKeSs1995
    @FaTCaKeSs1995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dude this is great. Public fund where I’m satisfied with.

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice of you to spend other people's money. $300,000 each as opposed to $75,000?

    • @FaTCaKeSs1995
      @FaTCaKeSs1995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1940limited so that gas compared to electric? Because when u spend to less expensive in future then right now with oil going up.

  • @sixtogonzaga655
    @sixtogonzaga655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Im suprised the US still uses diesel buses.. Some countries like china and singapore are now all or majoruty electric buses

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yet when you look at the list of literally the 100 most polluted cities almost all are either in China, India, or Pakistan. Not one is in the US

    • @yellowcard7139
      @yellowcard7139 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm surprised China practices a genocide against Muslims right now.

    • @zacharythornton1904
      @zacharythornton1904 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah and buses in China catch fire all the time

  • @Chengmaster
    @Chengmaster ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think busses, trucks and all large vehicles should have solar panels covering it. It may not fully power it but it would definitely still help. Think about how school busses sit around all day except when transporting kids.

    • @thatgui88
      @thatgui88 ปีที่แล้ว

      YES

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      Install the solar panels over the parking lot at the bus depot. That way they can charge batteries all day long and they can be connected to the grid. No need to haul them around on the buses

  • @xXRedTheDragonXx
    @xXRedTheDragonXx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Electric school buses are a really good idea to help push electric vehicles forward. I also think the same would be true for electric delivery trucks. Stuff that's not doing long-range travel and has ample opportunity to charge during off hours. It could also help push charging infrastructure and technology further! I really like this idea!

  • @tek1645
    @tek1645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is happening in Canada too. Really cool

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really cool until the first one blows up.

  • @_DeadeyeGaming
    @_DeadeyeGaming ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Am I the only psycho who likes the sound and feeling of being in a engine powered bus

  • @ntran2012
    @ntran2012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At $400k each, I believe Tesla can make a better bus for at a much lower price point. Just look at the semi truck they just unveiled.

  • @ijcarroll
    @ijcarroll 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've seen the chargers outside of my child's school. What I don't understand is, why they didn't go the extra mile and put $1700 worth of solar panels on the roof of each bus, and get a steady daily charge of 2200 watts and cut the demand on the grid. Thats around 8 kilowatt hours from 11 to 3 not to mention the other daily hours where you might get anywhere from 200-1500 watts. For a bus that's used before and sits until just after the peak hours it's a no brainer.

  • @Daonexus
    @Daonexus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Electric buses are cool! The only thing i would add to this is to have a regular drill for students incase there is a thermal runoff in the batteries (batteries catching fire).

    • @1940limited
      @1940limited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Electric school buses are real cool until one blows up. I hope kids aren't' onboard when it happens.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ICE vehicles catch fire way more than electric, it's just FUD spread by the oil industry - there are batteries on planes FFS!!

    • @ethananderson1682
      @ethananderson1682 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You guys don’t understand lithium iron phosphate batteries will be the prime source for most of these buses in the next coming years they don’t have thermal run away

  • @curtchase3730
    @curtchase3730 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Newer generation diesel buses have reduced exhaust emissions, plus, there is hardly ANY stinky smell anymore. Ya, you still get that clacking sound from engine, but even that's not as bad as the old ones. Now, what happened to hybrid technology? Instead of going full send on all electric, come up with an ICE "assist" first. Kinda like an electric bike, where both electric motor and human power work together, a small diesel engine work WITH electric motors as prime movers. You would still have some batteries of course, but not nearly as many as a full electric buss. Electric assist would come into play when a fully loaded bus takes off from a dead stop to get it rolling, then the engine would take up the slack to sustain cruising speed. To save money, the diesel engine would be tied into the main power train, (no generator in between). So, yes, the bus would be plugged in at night to recharge, but may need only like 1/3rd the batteries a full electric needs. Oh, regenerative braking would be a big help too! Use that rolling kinetic energy to charge the batteries instead of wasted heat in conventional braking system. The system would have to be very robust to tolerate the stress caused by the bus drivers' normal habit of floorboarding the go pedal, then do the same to the stop pedal at the next bus stop! I know most all electric vehicles already incorporate some sort of regen braking. Another perk of using a small diesel engine: It can run the A/C compressor(s) AND provide heat when cold! They don't mention those things when bragging about a full electric bus! Make any sense?

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      no ICE engine is clean enough, and still has Nox gases - hybrid just adds complexity so more cost and maintenance than just electric only. If it was worth it it would have been done already and China would have done it already, but they did this! - th-cam.com/video/0P7fTPLSMeI/w-d-xo.html

    • @curtchase3730
      @curtchase3730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markreed9853 Ya, there's tradeoffs for sure, but fewer batteries that don't get taxed quite as much as a 100% electric bus may help equalize it a bit. + are coal fired power plants cleaner than a present day computerized ICE engine? After all, it's all about how the electricity is being produced to charge all this EV stuff.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@curtchase3730 one main issue with ice vehicle engines is they are very inefficient as a lot of fuel is wasted as heat, so around 30% of the fuel is actually turned into motion. An electric motor is over 90% efficient so converts more of that energy into motion. I live in the UK where around 50% of electricity created is zero carbon which includes nuclear power. US electric grid in on about 20% renewables currently though I don't think that's including nuclear but all electric grids are getting cleaner up over time as more renewables are added. No, it's not perfect and never will be but electric vehicles will become better over time, burning gas not so much.

    • @curtchase3730
      @curtchase3730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markreed9853 Good arguments! So, the world has been living with ICE's that are only say 20-30% efficient. The piston engine that is a physical nightmare, has not changed much in over 120 years, is still here. Imagine how much more oil the world would have if only these out dated engines got even 50% efficiency! Ya, I know, add all the losses from the powertrain on top of all that. Fantasy, I know. Shame. Countries all over the world are banning diesel engines because they stink and pollute, ok fine. Gas engines can be outfitted with tons of devices to reduce emissions at the cost of using much more fuel than a diesel. Idiot government in the US thinks ethanol is the answer to reduce oil use. Joke. It takes MORE energy to process corn than the energy provided by it! Solar panels, Lithium batteries, all require so much energy to make in the first place, their life is nearly over before they break even! People that live in large cities in China walk around with face masks on, NOT just for Covid, but the pollution! They ride electric busses! They use coal to generate the clean electricity to charge their EV's. Rob Peter to pay Paul. No gains.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@curtchase3730 I agree with some things but no an electric vehicle pays back the extra carbon emissions of making the battery by around the 40,000 mile mark currently but this is getting better all the time. Yes, China does have a lot of coal power stations but then it has more solar and wind than any other countries as well, it has 1.3 billion people and produces a lot of the products for other companies, from other countries, so it's not a fair comparison. Pollution levels in the US, Canada and Australia per person are worse than China. The reason China wants to go electric is so that the air pollution is better in cities, just look at Shenzhen now.

  • @Foofrarf23
    @Foofrarf23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I grew up taking a diesel powered school bus to school and was bullied on it. We live in such a sensitive generation now it's crazy.

    • @Foofrarf23
      @Foofrarf23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Congratulations! You just won a lifetime supply of oil!

  • @Turgineer
    @Turgineer ปีที่แล้ว

    The spread of electric vehicles is good, but the sound of diesel engines is cool.

  • @UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ
    @UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Shame that America can't move into the current century and use normal service buses for schools. Why spend billions on dedicated buses which can only be used for a few hours of the day for only around 2/3rds of the year. Just invest in normal service buses and local transit agencies can then use those same buses for journeys between school times. And/or, work with local motorcoach operators for them to take on some routes using existing motorcoaches. They can make use of their vehicles 24/7 and can then do hired out between school times.
    Scrapping the dedicated fleet of school buses and putting kids on just as safe, normal buses or motorcoaches would likely save billions of pounds each year for American taxpayers. No drop in the quality of the service but it would go a long way towards reducing costs and simultaneously increasing local transit (as the costs for a smaller between school route will be lower as the bus kind of gets subsidised by the school transit) and increasing the amount of motorcoaches so supporting smaller businesses, often with less empty running to/from the route. Everyone wins, no one loses.

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sadly these electric buses don't have a good enough range for all use cases and will need charging ( like the driver said) a couple of times a day. Also, schools may be able to use them for V2G so they get paid to support the electric grid (or the school) with power during the day when plugged in.

    • @UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ
      @UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Julian Kazmier explain how my suggestion would cost more money? It's the model which is widely used across Europe to provide more transit at lower cost. Also used by some transit agencies already who run tripper services, just expanding that system en masse

    • @Searchforfulltruth911
      @Searchforfulltruth911 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ usa is very different and very big residential property is far away from commercial.and you need whole infrastruture trains and metro will cost a lot of money

    • @UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ
      @UserUCKANAOD8SlYguEhbCkUdlMQ ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Searchforfulltruth911 what's that got to do with it? I'm not criticising the routes or having dedicated school transport, just saying the type of vehicle used should change to a vehicle which is much more versatile and can be used for other purposes rather than yellow school buses which can only be used for a few hours per day.

    • @paulmentzer7658
      @paulmentzer7658 ปีที่แล้ว

      When School buses came into use, it was the 1920s and 1930s and most state legislatures were dominated by rural areas (Some States simply refused to redistrict after the 1920 census, for the 1920 Census was the first US Census where more Americans lived in Urban Areas then Rural Areas (The US Congress refused to reallocate Congressional seats after the 1920 Census for the same reason).
      Other states had different population in state senate districts, again giving more seats to rural areas then urban areas areas. Between these two most state legislatures were dominated by rural areas, even as more residences lived in urban areas.
      This lead to a tendency to give greater weight to rural areas then urban areas and most rural areas needed a cheap way to move children to anf from school, thus the American School bus was invented and forced not only on rural America but Suburban and even Urban America.
      In 1964 the US Supreme Court ruled it was a violation of the US Consitution for the states to give more power to voters in rural areas than urban areas and ordered the states to adopt "one man, one vote" rule for every state's legislature.. This took a fee years several states had to write whole new state Consitution to follow the US Supreme Court ruling.
      Since 1964 many of the worse parts of the older rural control of state legislatures were ended, but many remain. In Pennsylvania, for example, fuel tax is shared with each county based on oil usage in 1927. Why 1927? most urban residents either walked to and from work or took electric streetcars. Rural electrication would not occur till the 1930s so the biggest use of oil was oil lamps for rural lighting (Urban areas used electricity or natural gas for lighting) and due to the high rural income from 1914 to 1928, the biggest increase in automobile usage was in rural America (in 1927 Stalin sold Soviet wheat to buy industrial goods for his factory, this plus the Dust bowl pushed rural America into the Great Depression two years before the rest of the nation).
      Gasoline usage in urban America increased in the 1930s, as oil usage dropped in rural America but the Legislature wanted money to Rural Counties not Urban counties so refused to readjust the distribution formula and to my knowledge still has refused to permit any readjustment to that formula, so Pennsylvania distribute fuel taxes based on oil usage in 1927 not what it is today. It is an example of something done in that time period that affects us to this day.
      School bus regulation is still controlled by what was passed pre 1964 with some modifiable then. Rural legislators prefer the way it is, for any changes would be dominated by the needs of Suburban school districts not rural school districts.
      There are other examples of state legislatures refusing to make needed changes for the change would end subsidies to rural areas of the state. School bus regulations is one of them.

  • @avidcarsons6412
    @avidcarsons6412 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just stick with diesel .. To many unknowns

    • @PyroShields
      @PyroShields ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah breathing diesel only increases health issues.

    • @davehope2210
      @davehope2210 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What we do know is there is high probability of Fire and they emit EMF Radiation. It's just the nature of EVs

  • @id10t98
    @id10t98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The electrification of daily commuter vehicles could change the world's air pollution issues forever.

  • @GoalHornGeek
    @GoalHornGeek ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some districts it just doesn’t work though. Like mine. Sure it might work for the few routes in the downtown area but many of the routes went out to the suburbs. My bus went into downtown and then went out to the suburbs and would total 60 miles on just one route… not including other routes the bus has to take. There’s been times where the buses have run out of gas before. Just this year they finally phased out all Freightliner buses and now only operate Thomas C2’s and ICs which are not even like 10 years old. They’ve been taking like 7 or 8 buses a year I think so maybe after this they will cut down and add some electrics but idk

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      If 135 miles isn't enough for a specific case they could spec larger batteries but they would be heavier and cost more. Perhaps routes could be split up or redesigned to make them shorter. 60 miles each way is a pretty long ride to school for young kids

    • @GoalHornGeek
      @GoalHornGeek ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trevorritchie2575 it is but the district has bus shortages and covers a large area of space. Just about every bus is full to the brim

    • @trevorritchie2575
      @trevorritchie2575 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GoalHornGeek sounds like the district has some issues to work out. Good luck!

  • @zunedog31
    @zunedog31 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    $420,000 for a school bus and Fairfax runs 1000+ hahahaha

    • @carlettesouthern-robert2992
      @carlettesouthern-robert2992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The price will go down as volume of busses purchased goes up! 😎

    • @zunedog31
      @zunedog31 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@carlettesouthern-robert2992 Correct. Very unlikely to go down significantly in the next 20-30 years though.

    • @bt4kings
      @bt4kings 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      most EV's need a battery replacment after about 100xxx miles, whats a battery replacment on this cost? probably around 250-300k

    • @markreed9853
      @markreed9853 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bt4kings no, 15 years+, 200k+ miles with better battery chemistries now.

    • @carlettesouthern-robert2992
      @carlettesouthern-robert2992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not True, once the costs of manufacturing start coming down (which will be quickly), the savings are cumulative.
      In addition, we are investing in the future by not killing the🌏Planet we live on.😊
      Also take into consideration the higher paying jobs that we are adding to our communities.
      Bottom line: There were also lots of complaints when we humans were transitioning between horse🐴and buggies to the new fangled invention brought to market by Henry Ford, (😁the🚙car). Naysayers, doomsdayers, all lamenting the terrible consequences of creating new and profoundly beneficial transitions.
      All the obstacles and challenges CAN and WILL be solved.
      Nothing like a challenge for the human mind to overcome.🤸‍♂️💫🤸‍♀️
      So, just a suggestion. get on the BUS; and, ENJOY the ride! 🚍🌎😄😎
      The FUTURE is NOW!!
      👋💫

  • @rmatt24
    @rmatt24 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:25 Must be nice to have that type of bus parking!😢😮

  • @alb12345672
    @alb12345672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    NIce, but could the power grid deal with all these electric vehicles?

    • @Boxagami
      @Boxagami 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, it cannot.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It definitely can this is NoVA a fast growing area so the grid is continuously being expanded

    • @paniniman6524
      @paniniman6524 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just charge at night.

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes they can charge them at night. They don't need fastcharging.

    • @bilo6832
      @bilo6832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If all cars became electric overnight the grid would need 25% more capacity. So no, currently the grid cannot support an all EV fleet. But grid infrastructure can grow at a rate that can meet future demand assuming a transition over the next 10-15 years. The main issue with power generation is peak demand. EV’s can help with that if vehicle to grid (V2G) is adopted.

  • @janamaro5894
    @janamaro5894 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Blue Bird was stick with the Cummins, Thomas Built was stick with Porterra, And the other one IC, is staying with Navistar too. All those electric buses are here. Gas, propane, or diesel engine are not going anywhere. The manufacturers have to find a way to stick with internal combustion engines to reduce emission systems.

    • @Reeseshead
      @Reeseshead 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      IC Bus got screwed in 2009 because they had to keep up with the EPA. They had so many well maintenancable vehicles up to that point. Their 2009 IC FE prototype was gone and there's little to no more proof that it exists anymore.

  • @Jxordan
    @Jxordan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Are electric vehicles good for the environment?

    • @codybrown9401
      @codybrown9401 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, but democrats are using slight of hand to try and make it seem that way. Swapping oil power for coal power, not to mention the environmental damage done digging for the rare earth materials

    • @Kevin-cf8uu
      @Kevin-cf8uu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@codybrown9401 keep drinking that right wing kool aid

    • @paniniman6524
      @paniniman6524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@codybrown9401 then whats your solution if not electric cars?

    • @paskowitz
      @paskowitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes and no. It depends on the parts suppliers' raw materials sourcing and the power source for the electricity. They are unequivocally better for air quality though. They are also easier to keep running for longer and recycle, so theoretically we will "need" to produce fewer electric vehicles comparatively.
      So, now, no. Eventually, yes. So we need to go in this direction.

    • @mannyechaluce3814
      @mannyechaluce3814 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The minerals have to be mined, one of the minerals used in a lithium Ion battery is Nickel, nickel is one of the most poisonous mineral on earth. To recycle a lithium battery, you need to break it into individual minerals, the price to recycle them takes more money and resources than manufacturing them. We will have a landfill full of them pretty soon