Best way to check if an MTG card is Fake with no tools to buy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ส.ค. 2024
  • I describe the best method I have come up with for checking for authenticity of an MTG card (to see if it's real or fake) without having to buy any tools like a jeweler loupe or a digital microscope.
    Counterfeit/Fake MTG cards are becoming a problem on eBay and TCGPlayer, especially with lower value cards that no one would think to check and are lower value than what is required for eBay Authenticator. There are probably a lot of fake MTG cards in collections without anyone knowing.
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 232

  • @DismalDante
    @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Disclaimer: Although this method works on most cards, it does NOT work on Real Alternative 4th Edition Cards as well as Re-Backed Fake Beta cards that were made using a Real Collector's Edition Card Front Glued to a Real Card Back.

    • @ryansimonp3911
      @ryansimonp3911 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If it was glued at the back of hte CE then light test should do the job.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ryansimonp3911 Yes, the light test works great for exposing re-backed cards

    • @dero4378
      @dero4378 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      drink more water

    • @artist91fb
      @artist91fb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I use black light as fake cards do not absorb uv and just shine back. Also I have a table with the weight range. So far I have managed to protect myself. Got money back for a fake mishra’s workshop, as I had 3 and needed the 4, and also managed to find out a fake Japanese Narset parter of veils foil. Those ain’t cheap either.
      So far, this works for me.
      Photography scanners also do the trick. Specially because you really notice discolouration

  • @tannermattingly4462
    @tannermattingly4462 ปีที่แล้ว +470

    These days, the easiest way to check is if the cards are curled like a pringle. Fakes will lie flat, because a home printer has superior card quality to a multinational corporation.

    • @xFreSh999_
      @xFreSh999_ ปีที่แล้ว +42

      It's actually crazy that fake cards are more higher quality than the real deal. It's absolutely horrifying lmao

    • @samsonhaze6595
      @samsonhaze6595 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I laughed so goddamn hard at this… 5 or so years back I got *many* boxes of eternal masters boosters & cracked them all (wanted to see if I could turn a profit/just like gambling lol) I would say that I profited by this point, except that all of the cards I have left (foils much more so than non) are curled to an insane degree that I never once witnessed playing MTG when I was in high school/back around 7-8th edition era.
      In fact, I STILL have 7th edition foils that lie perfectly flat/are gem mint, despite no real humidity protection rofl. Card stock quality has taken a SERIOUS dive 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

    • @sunnyysss
      @sunnyysss 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      One year later and I too got a giggle out of this comment.

    • @dough4prez
      @dough4prez 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jokes on you for being a sucker and buying foils.

    • @Lightn0x
      @Lightn0x 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@samsonhaze6595 Store the foils in double sleeves. No more curling

  • @Elmarias777
    @Elmarias777 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    This is so funny, i was helping our local lgs determine genuine cards the other night (large collection was brought in and it was slow with nobody to play with, so i help out sorting, testing cards, etc) and I was using the red dot method when I was noticing that M shape.
    Glad someone fleshed it out more so I can better recognize and not need more specialized tools.
    Good job! Some modern cards are a little harder to distinguish, but the genuine cards are still much closer than fakes.

  • @whiplashxe
    @whiplashxe ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Pretty cool video overall, though some of the hand motions at the start had me wondering if it was a troll and you were going to rip the card to show the blue core. Glad to see an easy to access non-destructive method!

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Haha, funny, no trolling. This is a serious video :)

    • @DE-wq8cp
      @DE-wq8cp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DismalDante But its a legit test

  • @PabloNorte007
    @PabloNorte007 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Wow, spot on!
    I had a card which I wasn't sure about. Used your method, and it's more curved like the fakes. I even checked an Alliances card, and that had the volcano !!!

  • @reddogg8100
    @reddogg8100 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Simply put: thanks, Dante, from MtG Casual Commander Show. Love the detail and the care you gave. Much love, for real

  • @buddyWalrus
    @buddyWalrus ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My phone isn't good enough to get this amount of detail 😢but the volcano pattern is still pretty visible along with the difference in shape of the fine dots all over the card. Thank you!

  • @JC-ps8yo
    @JC-ps8yo ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was a great video! Honestly not sure how this channel has not blown up yet! You got a subscriber! :)

  • @keepingitcasualmtg
    @keepingitcasualmtg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At first I thought you were gonna recommend the bend test 😆 this is really helpful!

  • @richardaniballi1624
    @richardaniballi1624 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Appreciate the alternative way of checking! Thanks!

  • @MTGUnpacked
    @MTGUnpacked ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That's a cool approach, assuming your phone camera is high enough resolution. I wonder if you could apply that to some of the features on the front of the card (mana symbols, etc), since the print dots should be aligned in the same direction?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Good thought! I am investigating this and will post a video once I have conclusions.

  • @Name-zo3fm
    @Name-zo3fm ปีที่แล้ว +46

    How do you check double sided cards?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Good question, I'll have to come up with a different method for those.

    • @josephrion3514
      @josephrion3514 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Look, this man asking the right questions .

    • @canaantravis
      @canaantravis 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That the neat part, you don’t 😂

    • @matthewbryant2972
      @matthewbryant2972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just use an led flashlight and learn to identify the inner paper's texture... fake cards rarely have any translucency.

    • @enricobrasil
      @enricobrasil หลายเดือนก่อน

      It seems that doesn't work on low level cell phones. I have a Samsung A30 and the zoom in was too blurry.

  • @jbarstroff
    @jbarstroff ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Awesome video! I have a Modern Masters 2017 Misty Rainforest that is giving me a lot of Red Flags, but still not certain. Will check with this method and see what it shows!

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks! I'm curious about the results you get. Please update what you find.

  • @BouncingTribbles
    @BouncingTribbles ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video. The difference is pretty striking. The industrial printer has a pretty distinctive signature

    • @LyleH-13
      @LyleH-13 ปีที่แล้ว

      thats cuz its not a printer, it's a 4 stage press.

  • @hitmangfx7162
    @hitmangfx7162 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I know the focus is on the volcano, but the color difference is VERY striking as well. The high resolution really blows up the difference. Those fakes aren't even close!

  • @Snailing_Suika
    @Snailing_Suika 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    wow that was interesting - great job figuring this out!

  • @abyss9316
    @abyss9316 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Appreciate the video man what I subscribed to your channel as well I recently purchased a foil retro frame marsh Flats. Off eBay and I had a commenter on my video that I uploaded just showcasing the card and what I paid for it say that the card was a counterfeit and a friend of his makes textured cards just like that I knew without a shadow of a doubt that's a card was authentic because it was from a reputable seller I did the test to be sure and it checked out..

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice! I'm glad I was able to help!

  • @javier6283
    @javier6283 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I appreciate your video. Thanks. Im sure it'll save me money moving forward.

  • @gccstan31
    @gccstan31 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel like you can tell by just looking at the pattern of the brown area around the dots. The pattern of the black dots on authentic cards always goes in a 45 degree angle and you can always see that they constitute squares.

    • @larvatar2387
      @larvatar2387 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well I'll be, all these squares make a fucking circle.

  • @ZenosOsgorma
    @ZenosOsgorma ปีที่แล้ว

    The mountain template you used on the fake card isn't centred on the green either that's more noticeable than the amount of dots, so is the colour tone of the backing. .

  • @wademiller2376
    @wademiller2376 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have noticed it's much less likely to match on modern cards but older ones for sure works great

  • @securatyyy
    @securatyyy ปีที่แล้ว

    Newer phone cameras are pretty nuts. If you adjust some of the settings before you take the picture, you can get a lot more detail.

  • @moedark4390
    @moedark4390 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ive spotted fake cards that pass the green dot test and bend test. but they had poor light pass through and weighed too light

  • @markusaurelius83
    @markusaurelius83 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have bought an Imperial Seal from Double Masters. It passes this test. The edges are a bit rounder though and I don't see the "bark texture" when I do the light test. Is that strange?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The light test is not reliable anymore with so many variations of printing sources. The corners also can vary from set to set. If the card passes this volcano test, it is real

  • @TheDarkElder
    @TheDarkElder ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I matches well, except for re-backed (CE) cards being passed as Beta. They have a real back, but mostly fail only at a) weight or b) light test as they got glued together by the non-default material.

    • @hermodnitter3902
      @hermodnitter3902 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ...add alternate 4th as well. If I trusted this video, I'd thrown away the alternate 4th edition Fellwar Stone I received a couple of days ago (ordered a normal 4th edition).

  • @TheImmortalSoul
    @TheImmortalSoul ปีที่แล้ว

    I have two cards bought from a magic store that during the light test it shows a purple light coming from the back instead of a bright white light, it's probably not normal but the real question is: does some real cards show the same kind of result depending on the set for example?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Purplish or blueish light can be normal. What really matters in the print dot angle and density that I show in the video

  • @MTGJosh
    @MTGJosh ปีที่แล้ว

    Your calmness and composure is really nice. Are you a doctor or something like that? I can imagine you operating on someone without breaking a sweat.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I'm actually a software engineer

    • @MTGJosh
      @MTGJosh ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DismalDante Oh sweet! Great videos man.

  • @DigitalD20
    @DigitalD20 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Gonna be honest, the entire lead up I was expecting this to be a joke video and for you to just rip the card down the middle to check the core.

  • @dawidkiller
    @dawidkiller ปีที่แล้ว +6

    how do you check a flipcard though? :/

    • @PhoenicopterusR
      @PhoenicopterusR ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Easy, you flip over the card to look at the back, then you flip over the card to look at the back, then you flip over the card to look at the back...

  • @emobassist
    @emobassist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought manabarbs from fourth edition on tcgplayer a while back and it was one of the most pristine looking cards ive ever seen and i was skeptical

  • @Grenetpr
    @Grenetpr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's really cute, but I'll rely on my trusty Lupe

  • @michaeldries5436
    @michaeldries5436 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quick question. I tight the three red dots in there is what I should be looking for or is this a used counterfeit method now?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Verifying the 4 small red dot in an L shape on the green dot works, but only if you have a jewelers loupe or digital microscope. This method is an option for those that don't have these tools

  • @camcarb3
    @camcarb3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet. I'm checking my Beta Mox Ruby this way when I get home.

  • @shawnettethomas5026
    @shawnettethomas5026 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Thanks for the tip. 😊

  • @average_joe3325
    @average_joe3325 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would rather use the black dots method to check for real cards but thanks for the info.

  • @sirfishslayer5100
    @sirfishslayer5100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does not catch the clipped corner alterations or re-backed cards. Real card, fake set. Careful to look at MORE than one thing when verifying authenticity. But it is a great start. Pull out your loop and look at the red dots in your quest for verifying...especially high priced cards.

  • @eionhd2715
    @eionhd2715 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a couple of cards which im sus of this helped confirm suspicions id recommend this in a pinch!

  • @ewendavidhendrymcgregor1920
    @ewendavidhendrymcgregor1920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Getting like 3 different patterns of dots on the green symbol on islands printed within the Explorers of the Deep precon. Wizards consistency is propperly fucked

  • @normative
    @normative ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This seems like good way to catch bad fakes-any card that fails this test is certainly fake-but a card that passes surely isn’t guaranteed to be real. Just as one example: one of the more sophisticated ways of making a counterfeit is to use a real low-value card of the appropriate era and chemically remove the printing from the face side so it can be re-printed with a high-value card image. In that case, the back would (of course) pass this test, because the back is authentic. And I assume the dot pattern could be replicated with a counterfeit made from a sufficiently high-resolution scan with a sufficiently high-quality printer. That said, the fact that the counterfeits you acquired all failed the test may mean this is a good-enough test to catch most of the low-quality counterfeits actually circulating in the wild.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I generally agree, but I don't know how prevalent these other types of fakes are in trying to be sold as authentics to rip off people. I would post a follow up video if I'm able to find some examples

    • @subzero308
      @subzero308 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I mean at what point do we start calling pieces of cardboard fake 🤣🤣... Counterfeits r better quality then the garbage WoTC makes an r a fraction of the price of the secondary market... As someone who owns alot of high value cards and expensive decks i play magic for the skill and competitiveness of the game not because my deck is more expensive then someone else's. The whole reason counterfeit cards exist in the first place is because WoTC refuses to reprint the game pieces players need to play the game.. U wanna have expensive premium and foil cards fine but there should always be an affordable card for all formats so players can simply just play the game or allow proxies/counterfeit cards in tournaments. I have 5 top tier modern decks 3 r fully foiled and 2 legacy decks.. The prices for cards r insane. Id rather them reprint all the cards and so everyone can play the formats they want instead of just have these over priced cards in formats that r dying because most cant afford or just choose not to spend money on pieces of cardboard... I love buying cards and foiling out my decks but that's my choice... I have a playset of foiled orcish bowmasters (45-50$ cards) and a playset of nonfoil OBM (35-40$) y r the nonfoils only 10-15$ cheaper... Smh they should be 8-10$ at the very max... Sry bout the rant but as a very fortunate player who can buy expensive cards and play the game i love i feel bad for the people who just wanna play tournaments but cant because the mana base alone for most formats (modern and legacy) r the damn price of most peoples rent for the month. Its disgusting and really needs to change. If that means my cards lose value then so be it. The game being affordable for everyone is more important then me having 10s of thousands of dollars in cardboard. Again sry for the rant lol.

    • @thesnare100
      @thesnare100 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@subzero308 I have a book called mastering magic cards you can google, It suggests arguing you should be able to use proxies in tournies because you can't afford the real cards (power 9 etc) and it was printed about 30 years ago. It's argued those cards "unbalance" the game, but how do you objectively define that, anyone with the right kind of deck can unbalance it

  • @Kevin-lp3pu
    @Kevin-lp3pu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thx man! Really appreciate it!

  • @Jeans11234567
    @Jeans11234567 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The volcano test!

  • @Rallyhn
    @Rallyhn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    method works well, though some phone cameras the dots get blurry on magnification

  • @IngeniumMTG
    @IngeniumMTG 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you seen any modern fakes that have the mana symbols in the holofoil stamp

  • @nolifeSnorlax
    @nolifeSnorlax ปีที่แล้ว +7

    jewelers loupe is like 10 bucks and you can 100% be sure... just get that

  • @RSTAR171
    @RSTAR171 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video thank you!

  • @warrenvanbuskirk1337
    @warrenvanbuskirk1337 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Work at a lab and use a microscop to look for the red dot on the back. Good trick though

  • @remy333
    @remy333 ปีที่แล้ว

    The volcano looks like the Neon Dynasty logo a bit.

  • @shambo8850
    @shambo8850 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good content. Cheers!

  • @cabri358
    @cabri358 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cool, but its cheaper to buy a jeweler's loupe than a phone with a camera so good you can see the dots of the printing.

  • @billytheframe1355
    @billytheframe1355 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To be honest checking the black circle around the green dot already shows clear differences.

  • @ricardoblikman2676
    @ricardoblikman2676 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very good tutorial!

  • @MTGBradomAT
    @MTGBradomAT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    really good video :) Thanks

  • @dero4378
    @dero4378 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can anyone confirm this method?

  • @Slim3398
    @Slim3398 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dang my new iPhone can’t get a pic that good

  • @ZERO-jb8so
    @ZERO-jb8so 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I ordered masterpiece cards of ebay had me checking still cant tell 2 much but i think im good bc the people i got them from have thousands of 5 star ratings

  • @Highwaym4n
    @Highwaym4n ปีที่แล้ว

    Not gonna lie, I breathed a sigh of relief, because I was certain the answer was 'tear it.'

  • @thecasualcommandermtg
    @thecasualcommandermtg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Light test seems to be the quickest, imho.

  • @nobodycares1881
    @nobodycares1881 หลายเดือนก่อน

    some bro rn is learning what he needs to add to his counterfeit

  • @jbfraison
    @jbfraison 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really serve me for my limited rings from lotr

  • @gabrielesquaratti5709
    @gabrielesquaratti5709 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the red dots can be 3 to 4. not only 4.

  • @TCG9777
    @TCG9777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A buddy of mine gave me some counterfeit cards he used as proxies in his cedh pods and a small handful of them even pass the infamous, if not debunked, green dot test

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe they are real magic backs, but chemically wiped fronts and reprinted on. Can you share an example with a 2x zoom picture of front and back ?

  • @neillaw
    @neillaw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is a double issue here
    Premium fakes have better dpi quality than real cards, so you can't tell
    WOTC printing control is so bad that multiple avenues use different printing methods yet they are real cards - the glossy premium finish of the Belgium made vs the rough unfinished US versions for example - BOTH are legit prints

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      All the different real card printing methods still have the same print dot angle and density, where the fakes do not, so this method still holds. See my video th-cam.com/video/K9OwKLXZsPs/w-d-xo.html where I compare Belgium vs US printed Archon of Cruelty vs a Fake card

  • @savannahlion3081
    @savannahlion3081 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice Tip! 🤘🦁🤘

  • @dudewithacat
    @dudewithacat ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Damn, so simple... Time to shelve the microscope

    • @Thagor95
      @Thagor95 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try with your phone first. Some phone will always process the image taken through hdr and things like that, making this method not viable with that phone. So it depends on the phone.

  • @finmat95
    @finmat95 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much time before they'll start to fake the green spot?

    • @subzero308
      @subzero308 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I mean at what point do pieces of cardboard become fake? 😂

  • @Sharloks
    @Sharloks ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for teaching me how to make better proxies

  • @almisami
    @almisami ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I could see that those are some pretty meh-tier black core fakes, though. Not to mention a lot of MTG fakes are printed on real MTG cardstock that has been acetoned or UV'd out now to preserve the holographic stamp at the bottom.

    • @camerontapscott
      @camerontapscott ปีที่แล้ว

      Where can you get high quality fakes?

    • @subzero308
      @subzero308 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@camerontapscotttry ProxyKing they r really good. I don't use proxies/counterfeit cards but i 100% support them for players who just wanna play without breaking the bank.

  • @MilkieBeargames
    @MilkieBeargames ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this still true on new cards like EDH pre cons or secret lair?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it should. Let me know if you find different

    • @hermodnitter3902
      @hermodnitter3902 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. Not true for alternate fourth edition though.

  • @darkdonzaloog
    @darkdonzaloog ปีที่แล้ว

    I think mine are fake, they just have totally white backs and the images on some of them are pink like it was running out of ink 🤔

  • @appeardead
    @appeardead ปีที่แล้ว

    nowadays, WOTC print quality is so bad real cards probably fail this, usually the thing that tells me its a fake is the quality of the art, because the printers proxy makers use just doesnt get the same vibrance of a real card if you look closely.

  • @Sicko-Tron
    @Sicko-Tron หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can make fakes that pass this but I can't fake it so the black dots line up under a microscope lenses but 99% of the time this will be fine

  • @dero4378
    @dero4378 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn. I didn't know I own a smartphone... Can you tell me where it is? I could use a smartphone.

  • @ZacktheWize
    @ZacktheWize ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow this is really interesting

  • @snooopledinkeroo
    @snooopledinkeroo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All you gotta do is tear the card in half 😂

  • @autobotjazz1972
    @autobotjazz1972 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hmmm interesting the pattern could be recreated on a fake card but it seems unlikely someone making fake cards going to enough trouble to do so.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It would be very difficult at the microscopic level to replicate

    • @autobotjazz1972
      @autobotjazz1972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DismalDante Agreed but as it exists it could be recreated, though likely not cheaply enough for those who make fake cards and proxies.

    • @54321eclipse12345
      @54321eclipse12345 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They would need the same printer basically.
      If you could make cards indestinguishable would they even be fake?

    • @autobotjazz1972
      @autobotjazz1972 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@54321eclipse12345 Exactly and thats why it is not gonna happen as the fakers do not want to invest that much money into their scams, those types of printers are very expensive. They would be as they would not be produced by WOTC though given their recent behavior i would not give a rip.

    • @huntergale7171
      @huntergale7171 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@54321eclipse12345 that’s some deep philosophical shit right there. If they’re so good you can’t tell them apart from real ones then you pretty much just gotta accept that they’re legit now

  • @INDIE505
    @INDIE505 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very hice phone, could you please tell me which brand and model it is?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Google Pixel 6 pro :)

  • @gir5o1
    @gir5o1 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    How to tell if your magic cards are fake without having to spend $10-30 on a loupe or a microscope. Save money by using a $250+ smart phone.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Exactly! Well said :)

    • @MichaelSuperbacker
      @MichaelSuperbacker ปีที่แล้ว +15

      You mean $1,000 plus smartphone . What are you buying for $250?

    • @norrock1
      @norrock1 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Chances are you're already going to have the smartphone lol

    • @Sweetguy1821
      @Sweetguy1821 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Smart phones also serve many more useful functions outside of checking cards. So it has that going for it as well lol

    • @IVISMiLESIVI
      @IVISMiLESIVI ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You can get a decent smartphone for $100 easy idk what ya'll smokin.

  • @SuicidelG
    @SuicidelG ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't fakes be printed like that?

  • @Heltonheta
    @Heltonheta ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You just need to have a phone with super good camera 😅

  • @rebentytribe1716
    @rebentytribe1716 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I haven't smartphone so i need to buy a tool to do this ;-)

  • @TheFu3lman
    @TheFu3lman ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just used your method on a ton of old reserved list cards I had that wasn't 100% sure of, and they're all volcanoes :D
    Awesome catch, and awesome vid

  • @PM-xc8oo
    @PM-xc8oo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So I grabbed a very real Ixalan card that I have handy ( a basic land that I use as a bookmark) and humorously, I don't think it passes this test.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you share a picture you took of the card?

    • @PM-xc8oo
      @PM-xc8oo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DismalDante I am messing with the reply options in TH-cam and I am not seeing an option to post a picture.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      One option: You can use imgbb.com and upload the picture and share link to it

  • @EXHUMEnCONSUME
    @EXHUMEnCONSUME ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry, champ. My smartphone camera ain't that good.

  • @AngelusNielson
    @AngelusNielson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't own a smartphone.

  • @MichealDraven
    @MichealDraven ปีที่แล้ว

    jewelers loops are 10 dollars. Youll save yourself 6 minutes from not watching this video. Which is infinitely more precious.

  • @ddaa502
    @ddaa502 ปีที่แล้ว

    " you won't be able to see the 4 red dots with a jewelers loup" - What? You absolutely can see the "Red L" with a loup, even a cheap sub-$10 Chinese loup from Amazon.

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      I was talking about the picture taken with a smartphone, where you won't be able to see the 4 red dots. Yes, you can see it with a loupe, but this method is for those that do t have a loupe

  • @JarodM
    @JarodM ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What happens when AI digitally prints an indistinguishable replica? I give it a few years. Great video, thanks~👍

    • @footstol66
      @footstol66 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ai really doesn't apply here.
      We just need a high enough scan and print for this method.
      If you think in wrong tell me how AI applies.

    • @JarodM
      @JarodM ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@footstol66 AI and digital printing will likely be able to be programmed to make nearly an exact and/or an indistinguishable copy, it's just a matter of time. Wizard's of the coast will have to use their sorcery to design a new method of authenticity.

    • @hermodnitter3902
      @hermodnitter3902 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JarodM they already did, you gotta check for example the Micro-text with WIZARDS in the holo stamp. Not so easy to duplicate that one.

  • @retsamy1584
    @retsamy1584 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its way more easy with the blue one. Its full blue with real and raster pattern blue with fakes

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      Good catch, but Im not sure it would work for all fakes, but it is true for the ones I have checked. Making a fake with full cyan in the blue spot would probably be relatively easy, since it doesn't depend on the print dot angle or density, only making the cyan dots bigger to fill in the blue spot

  • @MegaMinecrafteFan
    @MegaMinecrafteFan ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks, now I know how to make my counterfeits more realistic /s

    • @buddyWalrus
      @buddyWalrus ปีที่แล้ว

      Lolol but in all seriousness, it would still be hard for counterfeit printers to do this since these dot patterns are built into the printer itself. They would likely need the same exact printer as the official factories and even then it would still be hard. The real cards themselves have plenty of other variances as it is.

  • @SenatorAri
    @SenatorAri 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If anyone is making a fake mtg card I'm sure they'd make it worth while. I haven't seen any cheap mtg fakes

  • @tylerrichards1676
    @tylerrichards1676 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am a printer and I hate seeing these videos. His method is accurate and works. The "pattern" is a process due to printing plates laying ink over the same area of another color, commonly reffered to as "half tone dots". You can make fakes that will not be caught by this process. All you have to do is duplicate what the printer does and create a set of printing plates. You all have fakes and don't know it. Tell me the last time you went to a printer and looked at that equipment versus the criminals that are creating fakes. Most people who create copies will not invest in all that equipment. I know people that have said equipment and do create fakes for documentation of process and museum replica pieces.

    • @soyjimmyflores
      @soyjimmyflores ปีที่แล้ว

      True, but he didn't say this was the only way. This is one way, a rather simple way, to use in conjunction with other methods.

  • @soulkens
    @soulkens ปีที่แล้ว

    I have ran into fakes that pass this, I think legit mtg cards are all over now

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      Pics or It Didn't Happen 😉

  • @MrAwesomePoopz
    @MrAwesomePoopz ปีที่แล้ว

    can you try doing this on magic 30th anniversary cards?

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This.method only works on real cards with real card backs

  • @derp7738
    @derp7738 ปีที่แล้ว

    Says no tools required, then requires a tool (smart phone).

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think I said "no tools to buy" Most people have a smartphone 🤪

    • @kotto7877
      @kotto7877 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DismalDante Yeah, and a lot of those smartphones can't take such microscopic pictures. Even with a magnifier attachment, my phone can't do this. Fortunately I have a loupe.

  • @kooziesan
    @kooziesan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No tools to buy! Just go buy a nice phone!

  • @Benjamin-ol4jx
    @Benjamin-ol4jx ปีที่แล้ว

    Experience

  • @keiharris332
    @keiharris332 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is the bend test... or ripping it in half! ^_^

  • @hermodnitter3902
    @hermodnitter3902 ปีที่แล้ว

    "If this patterns isn't there, the card is fake". Which is completely wrong. Alternate 4th edition are perfectly legal cards, and have a completely different green dot and overall printing as well, like no rosette pattern. So if I trusted this video, I'd thrown away the alternate 4th edition Fellwar Stone I received a couple of days ago (ordered a normal 4th edition).

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว

      Although this method works on most cards, Alternative 4th Edition cards may be an exception. Can you share an image of the back of your Fellwar Stone that you have? You can use imgbb.com and upload the picture and share link to it

    • @hermodnitter3902
      @hermodnitter3902 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DismalDante just go to timestamp 6:10 in the video linked below (the whole video is very good to see the difference for alternate fourth cards:
      th-cam.com/video/llBqeM1J7qw/w-d-xo.html

    • @DismalDante
      @DismalDante  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, I agree these Alternative 4th edition cards look totally different. Since they were never officially released to the public by Wizards, I wouldn't think much product would be out there, but I'll put a disclaimer to warn others.

    • @hermodnitter3902
      @hermodnitter3902 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DismalDante sounds great. There isn't very much, but not extremely few either (like summer) so if someone gets a fourth edition card that feels off, I'd say it's just as probably that it is a real alternate, than a fake... :)

  • @patmacrotch5611
    @patmacrotch5611 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think everyone should check every card they buy. This method is great but if you are buying cards you can afford a $5 jewelers loupe. There is no excuse not to buy one. I have looked at so many mana dots and other print rosettes that I can immediately tell fake when looking. These methods have saved me a ton.
    Also, EVERYONE if you get fake cards on eBay you MUST leave negative feedback. I don’t care if the seller gives some sob store about “oh it was a mistake, oh it slipped through by accident, I’m sorry I didn’t know”. It’s the sellers responsibility to be checking the cards they sell. If they let a fake slip through that means negative feedback. And I mean this even if you get your money back no hassle. Sellers intentionally sell fakes then just hope no one notices, and if they notice they just refund. It’s a known scam. For every 100 fakes they sell, maybe 5-10 get returned. People have to start leaving negative feedback if they get fake cards. Not neutral , only negative feedback. A sellers rating should be hurt if they sell fake cards.

  • @Ohriyion
    @Ohriyion ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why even take all these extra steps when you can buy an x50 /x75, even a x100 jeweler's loup for $5.00 (cheap x50 is still x50) and just know without a doubt with way less work.