Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like "Dasein" as intuited by Heidegger is an attempt to articulate the fundamental "hypostatic" reality seeded in and throughout all existents or the logoi, the manifold Uncreated Activities (which are all Personal), which pertain to the Created Order. It seems like he's trying to recover the ancient methodology of seeing everything as fundamentally personal (hypostatic, ontological) and not as essential (impersonal, ontic). I feel that the parable of the Prodigal Son best illustrates the last 1000 years in the West quite well. The West "took hold of the inheritance" of the Christian sources and running with them in their own way, apart from the direct intimacy afforded through the nous, by employing a fundamentally Occult and Neoplatonic Essentialist paradigm, now seems to be arriving at the point of "coming to himself". In other words, there's an awakening of sorts happening. The problem of the observer in physics seems to testify to this awakening as well. Exciting time
Christ's individual mode of willing in joining everyone, including the lowest of the low, to Himself, fulfills the Father's Will (the Divine Will shared by all the 3 Persons). Each of the Divine Persons being fully distinct yet undivided Energize (1 Divine Energy, not 3) the singular Divine Will according to their distinct modes of willing. We also see this in the Theophany where we hear the Father speaking. So Christ isn't willing anything against His Father when He's asking Him to forgive His persecutors. He's fulfilling a very gruesome aspect of our fallen nature kenotically and lifting up His accusors with Him in a way.
I just realized something, being is experiance, as in what you are doing right now, it's that which is missatributed to "I think therefore I am" being comes before logic, it's a mistake to confuse those, but both are adressing the same thing, the "AM" in I am.
Lost in the Cosmos by Walker Percy From Transgenderism to Transhumanism by Martina Rothblatt Barren Metal and Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by Dr E Michael Jones
Interesting discussion but that noise is irritating a f also when I hear people talk about 'capitalism' they seldom mention that the so called capitalism we have in the west is monopolistic since 1913.
1:22:00 - "Why are we put in this situation in the first place?" I think this is how we are made real. This world is the creative engine of God, and all things work toward that end. There are no other ways for people to be made. Even the term "throwness" makes me think of making pottery. Throwing the clay on the wheel. Everything makes us. The good, the bad, everything.
a. dugin may not have said "kill every ukrainian" but he doesnt raise his voice against the slaughter of children and other innocents it is not hard to find his quotes Not on leading us into an open space where anything can happen but quotes on his determined purpose to bring about the destruction the end of the whole world which he callos "the last thought of god" and which he says is the whole reason for the existence and purpose of russia which is to bring this not open but dead end street about
I love Blake and it pains me a little to have him mentioned alongside Heidegger and Dugin. That said, this was a very good conversation. This idea of the inner and outer is fascinating, and it's hard for me to disagree because this bringing light to the inner theology is a basically what we do all the time at Grail Country. At the end of the day I just disagree with Dugin and Heidegger's metaphysics. Heidegger, having not read Maximus, has an excuse, Dugin doesn't.
@@WhiteStoneName I don't know anything anymore either, as my Voxer messages should indicate. I really don't want to make a Pageau was right about everything video but might have to :)
What I found a bit eerie here is how she somewhat "gets" Heidegger intuitively just be virtue of sharing his experience of older rural ways of life. I mean what she described is what Heidegger's experience of a forrest clearing would've been, what he would've witnessed. She seems to be attuned to his way of thinking. People might chuckle at "does an organ has its Dasein" (or say that she unintentionally engaged in object oriented ontology lol) but she correctly guessed that there is something about telos or project to Dasein. And she intuitively gets the difference between jumping in for someone, giving them done deal, and jumping ahead, opening a space of possibilities for them. So just by virtue of the life she leads she already gets some things easier than an academic Heideggerian would.
Thank you for the comment. It was encouraging to me. I was so eager to talk to James because I had this idea that I wanted to bounce off him since he has studied Heidegger and I haven’t. It was definitely an intuition. Now I have to look up object oriented ontology:)
![Rick Roderick on Heidegger - The Rejection of Humanism [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sDqDJJcJAOg/mqdefault.jpg)
I can't get enough of Heidegger and Dugin. The shire is not the shire without the hobbits. Thank you for your time
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like "Dasein" as intuited by Heidegger is an attempt to articulate the fundamental "hypostatic" reality seeded in and throughout all existents or the logoi, the manifold Uncreated Activities (which are all Personal), which pertain to the Created Order. It seems like he's trying to recover the ancient methodology of seeing everything as fundamentally personal (hypostatic, ontological) and not as essential (impersonal, ontic). I feel that the parable of the Prodigal Son best illustrates the last 1000 years in the West quite well. The West "took hold of the inheritance" of the Christian sources and running with them in their own way, apart from the direct intimacy afforded through the nous, by employing a fundamentally Occult and Neoplatonic Essentialist paradigm, now seems to be arriving at the point of "coming to himself". In other words, there's an awakening of sorts happening. The problem of the observer in physics seems to testify to this awakening as well. Exciting time
That's more or less right I think. How do we understand Dasein in the context of the Geopolitical question?
I LOVE this comment. Exactly. That's my intuition as well.
Feeling at home here.
Christ's individual mode of willing in joining everyone, including the lowest of the low, to Himself, fulfills the Father's Will (the Divine Will shared by all the 3 Persons). Each of the Divine Persons being fully distinct yet undivided Energize (1 Divine Energy, not 3) the singular Divine Will according to their distinct modes of willing. We also see this in the Theophany where we hear the Father speaking. So Christ isn't willing anything against His Father when He's asking Him to forgive His persecutors. He's fulfilling a very gruesome aspect of our fallen nature kenotically and lifting up His accusors with Him in a way.
I just realized something, being is experiance, as in what you are doing right now, it's that which is missatributed to "I think therefore I am" being comes before logic, it's a mistake to confuse those, but both are adressing the same thing, the "AM" in I am.
Lost in the Cosmos by Walker Percy
From Transgenderism to Transhumanism by Martina Rothblatt
Barren Metal and Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by Dr E Michael Jones
What a delightfully weird and wonderful person. Thanks for drilling down into her personal reflective thoughts.
Interesting discussion but that noise is irritating a f also when I hear people talk about 'capitalism' they seldom mention that the so called capitalism we have in the west is monopolistic since 1913.
1:22:00 - "Why are we put in this situation in the first place?"
I think this is how we are made real. This world is the creative engine of God, and all things work toward that end. There are no other ways for people to be made. Even the term "throwness" makes me think of making pottery. Throwing the clay on the wheel. Everything makes us. The good, the bad, everything.
Amen
a. dugin may not have said "kill every ukrainian" but he doesnt raise his voice against the slaughter of children and other innocents it is not hard to find his quotes Not on leading us into an open space where anything can happen but quotes on his determined purpose to bring about the destruction the end of the whole world which he callos "the last thought of god" and which he says is the whole reason for the existence and purpose of russia which is to bring this not open but dead end street about
I love Blake and it pains me a little to have him mentioned alongside Heidegger and Dugin. That said, this was a very good conversation. This idea of the inner and outer is fascinating, and it's hard for me to disagree because this bringing light to the inner theology is a basically what we do all the time at Grail Country. At the end of the day I just disagree with Dugin and Heidegger's metaphysics. Heidegger, having not read Maximus, has an excuse, Dugin doesn't.
See the comment from Pano Kostouros below.
@@WhiteStoneNameSaw it, and don't agree, not even a tiny bit.
@@grailcountry ok. I don’t really know. I just like the thought of it and it’s probably just me projecting things that I want to be true.
@@WhiteStoneName I don't know anything anymore either, as my Voxer messages should indicate. I really don't want to make a Pageau was right about everything video but might have to :)
1:12:00 Nations have a calling from God as members of the Body of Humanity.
Love it.
What I found a bit eerie here is how she somewhat "gets" Heidegger intuitively just be virtue of sharing his experience of older rural ways of life. I mean what she described is what Heidegger's experience of a forrest clearing would've been, what he would've witnessed. She seems to be attuned to his way of thinking. People might chuckle at "does an organ has its Dasein" (or say that she unintentionally engaged in object oriented ontology lol) but she correctly guessed that there is something about telos or project to Dasein. And she intuitively gets the difference between jumping in for someone, giving them done deal, and jumping ahead, opening a space of possibilities for them.
So just by virtue of the life she leads she already gets some things easier than an academic Heideggerian would.
Thank you for the comment. It was encouraging to me. I was so eager to talk to James because I had this idea that I wanted to bounce off him since he has studied Heidegger and I haven’t. It was definitely an intuition.
Now I have to look up object oriented ontology:)
Born into existence and non existence at the same moment.
Fresh take, thinking of new tenses for the word “there,” in Being-There.
1:13:12 we base our education on Guy Fieri?!
That's much better, I gave up on the other one, and that would be a lost.
Looking forward to this!