Arson ruled out as cause of Oceanside Pier fire

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @kvpilots
    @kvpilots 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I miss this pier. Breaks my heart

    • @yadiraosorio7880
      @yadiraosorio7880 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fr, I used to go here years ago, the memories…

  • @motherbrooks1250
    @motherbrooks1250 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    absolutely the worst firefighting job i have ever seen what a joke!

  • @matthew8036
    @matthew8036 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    why did they allow it to burn all through the night ????? fire started at 3pm

    • @HudJa-tu2xq
      @HudJa-tu2xq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s on a here, pier they can’t drive fire trucks or lifeguards on there and there main focus was to cut that part of from burning down the rest of the pier and do you think they have hundreds of fire boats on scene? They did everything they can. Laguna Beach fire in orange county fire are the best in the country.

    • @HudJa-tu2xq
      @HudJa-tu2xq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And they were on top of it they wernt just watching it.

  • @Themanisred
    @Themanisred 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    when the businesses are not being used. All of the electrical are not being maintained. And with the ocean air and how corrosive that is , it doesn't surprise me that it's electrical.

    • @GregoryCunningham
      @GregoryCunningham 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You are very mistaken. It was being used, by the Brine Box as their kitchen. They are 100% at fault.

    • @appleintosh
      @appleintosh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GregoryCunningham The fire might not have started in the kitchen

    • @KareemPinkston
      @KareemPinkston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GregoryCunningham- (sigh) Yes BrineBox was using the building, but only for food prep and not for cooking.
      But more importantly, the building is not there's; it belongs to the city.
      The entity that stands to gain the most from that building burning down is the city, not a small local business.
      If found out, their local reputation would be compromised and all 4 of their other businesses would be scrutinized.
      In addition, I don't believe any form of insurance they have would be able to cover the amount of damage caused to the pier.
      All I'm saying is that if it was accidental, that's one thing. But not intentional.
      The entity that gains the most from this is Oceanside City. 🤔

    • @joycedudzinski9415
      @joycedudzinski9415 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You can see the hot flames coming from one certain area.

    • @appleintosh
      @appleintosh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KareemPinkston The pier and all the city owned structures on the pier are almost certainly self-insured by the city. Municipalities usually don’t insure public infrastructure, the costs would get out of control quickly. What does the city stand to gain from this if not money?

  • @ItisMeMike
    @ItisMeMike 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wow. I thought for sure was homeless. I didn't know the brine box used that building.

    • @KareemPinkston
      @KareemPinkston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes. BrineBox was using the building for prep and I also believe they were planning to take-over the lease and open there.
      But I found it interesting that he says "the company that was going to takeover"... but didn't say specifically BrineBox 🤔

  • @michaelwells7348
    @michaelwells7348 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Unless U already know the cause... how can u rule out Arson ??... were people living in it >

    • @KareemPinkston
      @KareemPinkston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nobody was living in the building.
      They would have been a liability to the BrineBox food prep in that kitchen.
      They would have called the "City Gatekeepers" to remove them.

  • @capitans12
    @capitans12 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    My pier!!! 😭😭😭

  • @antiquecycleservices7172
    @antiquecycleservices7172 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Oceanside F.D. needs to be Investigated. Talk about a "Controlled Burn"

  • @Moondoggy1941
    @Moondoggy1941 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    32 Police officers, you have two Police Men at the very beginning of the pier to keep people off. Not 32 officers.

    • @macking104
      @macking104 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      During the fire…

    • @HudJa-tu2xq
      @HudJa-tu2xq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Traffic control also they probably blocked off multiple areas and investigators.

  • @Jjjgfygojhfvb
    @Jjjgfygojhfvb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Insurance Fraud.

    • @Wyndstrom
      @Wyndstrom 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      haha, my thought exactly.

    • @scottprather5645
      @scottprather5645 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They just said it wasn't arson are you brain dead?

    • @charmio
      @charmio 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nah, a new company was already planning renovations. Even with insurance paying for the building itself the owners still going to loose money with the delay and lost opportunity costs.

    • @scottprather5645
      @scottprather5645 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@charmio yeah agreed. too bad a lot of peoples MO is just to make assumptions with no attempt at critical thinking

    • @topcatwarrior
      @topcatwarrior 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The city owns the pier and building, so hardly likely it’s fraud.

  • @larry-g8e
    @larry-g8e 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Has anyone in this town ever heard of fire sprinklers...??? Every room...Smoke alarms..Duh !!!!

  • @UQRXD
    @UQRXD 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let me guess not enough hose to make it to fire.

    • @larry-g8e
      @larry-g8e 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't want to know where the toilet flushes go..

  • @michaelscott4718
    @michaelscott4718 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ill bet whoever was gonna take over that lease is the one whos behind the fire

  • @bryanross2289
    @bryanross2289 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No Arson no Insurance ???

  • @tonypalermo5796
    @tonypalermo5796 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A great location for a McDonald's.

  • @Acehitman369
    @Acehitman369 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Man, are those fire boats using a garden hose 😆 or something? The water was barely making it up there 😆

    • @KareemPinkston
      @KareemPinkston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That typically happens when they get older.... 😜

    • @kendallevans4079
      @kendallevans4079 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Weak stream! And the boat gets up 3X a night to do even that!

  • @badelandres
    @badelandres 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The rubies in Oceanside also had electrical issues that caused the fire. Maybe it's the type of material that was used in that era

  • @kendallevans4079
    @kendallevans4079 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All the corporate capitalist developers are wetting themselves with visions of the chain restaurants they can put out there now that that HISTORIC ICON has been eliminated! A Starbucks and a 5 Jerks burger? It's all about money, right!

  • @ronboeckler3735
    @ronboeckler3735 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fire department is looking for an accelerant the fact that the restaurant is out there and has various sources for fire to start seems to me to be overlooked.

  • @blackalaskal3372
    @blackalaskal3372 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Look at the brine box…..just don’t pan over so the viewers can see it…

  • @sfv6
    @sfv6 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Modern day demolition

  • @mrsteveinsandiego
    @mrsteveinsandiego 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gonna take awhile to rebuild.

  • @moonshinefuel
    @moonshinefuel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    yea we still dont know what happened but ruling out something we dont know, okay sounds good

  • @GregoryCunningham
    @GregoryCunningham 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SInce (all signs are pointing to) this fire being caused by Brine Box staff, is ownership going to shoulder the cost of reconstruction?

    • @JohnLemieux
      @JohnLemieux 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What signs are pointing to that?

  • @FernyB58
    @FernyB58 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Definitely was arson recently remodeled and if im not mistaken reinsured has arson/insurance job written all over it and not to mention there was already plans to rebuild it before the flames were extinguished…..

    • @KareemPinkston
      @KareemPinkston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The city needs to recoup all the mo way they lost over the years of it being vacant. It's a convenient method that many corporations use.
      Funny how this is a repeat of 2016 Seal Beach Pier.

    • @kendallevans4079
      @kendallevans4079 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same thing as a few months ago up here in Tustin when one of the historic blimp hangers got lit up. The smoke hadn't even cleared and the Irvine Company was already in negotiation with the US Navy for a dirt cheap sale so they can glue together yet ANOTHER beige chicken wire and stucco townhouse development and sell them at 1.3 million a pc.

  • @JtM8292
    @JtM8292 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🤔🤔 SOOOOO... 🕵🕵 INSURANCE FRAUD !!!

  • @ArgeliaCamarena-oh6gv
    @ArgeliaCamarena-oh6gv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The lies they know what happene. Insurance

  • @foxtrot-oscar-f2u
    @foxtrot-oscar-f2u 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...lots a J ⚡️deez days🤔

  • @blondie7240
    @blondie7240 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Probably a homeless

  • @AllenMichael-pl6ps
    @AllenMichael-pl6ps 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ATF dog is a plant....

    • @wil3
      @wil3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      atf dog aint no snitch