@@gareginasatryan6761 As Infantry veteran i sign upon every word you said. People have this romantic idea of war, thinking its all about Ramboing all over the place. Sadly i have met people after service who still never realized it.
@@Salamander676 They were referring to the visual graphics and not the visual guide aids which are a must for the game to be playable to the widest market`
It’s not the same Video games are made to be entertaining and you can play them comfortably wherever Killing isn’t fun when consequences are turned off and you feel every dormant human emotion erupting out of your soul at once while you take someone else’s life
I didn't realize that this was Vanguard and my impression was "Damn this looks like a cheap ripoff of Call of Duty." The graphics have gotten more detailed but everything else still feels 20 years old.
whats funny is the IW engine that every cod game utilizes is actually 22 years old. dont expect activision to spend a fraction of their resources developing a new one tho
Ridiculously fast paced and unrealistic. Enemy AI is on star wars "Stormtroooper" level of dumb. I do like that the player can finaly give orders though.
I don't know about these tactics. Drive a couple of trucks into a minefield, then sprint across the minefield, then charge machine guns across a fairly long & open field. Surely there's a better way. The Call of Duty AI hasn't gotten any smarter in 20 years either
@@Shenaniganator101 YEAH i remember they had to flank MG nests and use actual infantry tactics. it resembled brothers in arms gameplay. but now they run straight at bunkers with multiple MG's now lmao
I'm no military guy but even I thought this stuff would get you killed quickly. It'd be different if they drove a tank through the mines but those trucks only had 4 points of contact. Those machine gunners would've made cream chip beef out of those lads irl
A lot of it has to do with making the game move along while still including as much material as possible. When we did research years ago the conclusion is that people got use to not waiting, for anything and they pro created a generation that didn't know what it means to wait. Stay with me, The conclusion to the analysis is: the more realistic the game is the more you wait around gathering players, introductions, talking smack, assigning rank and position, strategy etc. Next thing ya know six hours passed and not one shot has been fired. The people seeking that experience is greatly outweighed by people wanting to kiss their ass good bye while putting the gas pedal to the mat through a mine field. Everyone has fun on a different level. My suggestion for those who except nothing less from a game that deos not represent "IRL" is the following directions" STEP 1: Turn off the gaming counsel. A real life conversation: The Bank: " So your idea is to drive full speed through a mine field, get out and run straight into the barrel of a purring machine gun?" Developer: "Fuck n A right." The Bank: "You are approved." Account limit: "endless funds." Results 20 years later: Was it worth it it? Fuck N A right it was.
Homeboy opens one door and gets his head blown off. Meanwhile, Captain Allied runs out into the open, takes thirty shots to the dome, and keeps it moving.
You die a bunch of times in the battlefield campaign portraying how indiscriminatory and ruthless war was. Doesn't matter your background story, it was so much up to luck whether you lived or didn't
If you want an ultra realistic WW2 shooter, play Hell Let Loose. It really doesn't get more gruesome and beautiful than that game. Insurgency Sandstorm is another damn gruesome game.
@@jmeszi4159 That depends on whether you beleive its better to hide a young mind from, representations of reality, and coddle them to be soft weakminded snowflakes.. imo
What’s Hell Let Loose? Isn’t it called Walking Simulator? 😂 All jokes aside I do enjoy Hell Let Loose, but I don’t play it when I’m looking for fast paced action, something most gamers want rather than running across and open field for 10 minutes before getting sniped.
I actually like this game lol- being a WW2 buff( yes I know the historical inaccuracies) I love WW2 games. WAW is still my favorite- wish a remastered version were to come out. Although I’ve always had fun on the multiplayer side of Call of Duty I’m more interested in the Campaigns.
This mission looks like the battle of Pont Du Hoc during the Normandy invasion. I went to those cliffs where the US rangers climbed up to take out the German artillery guns firing down the beaches. Awesome location to play through in a game.
pretty much every machine gun *did* have tracer rounds in WWII. it's more common and exaggerated in media than in real life i suppose, but in movies and especially video games you need them as visual cues to help show the audience/player what's being shot at.
Soooo. Make a head on attack into fixed positions defended by MG42s, as well as two half tracks armed with MG34s, take 70% casualties and necessitate a very valuable troop of paras being stood down from further action, all while failing to call off naval bombardment that would have taken out the coastal guns without your intervention. You could have stayed in bed and got a better result. But that’s ‘leadership’ eh? If that were real you would have been put against a wall - and deserved it. Nice graphics though.
Came to the comments to see if others were question this same thing or if I'd just missed something. But yeah, why attack if it's going to be bombed anyway from a safe distance? I mean, i know why: it's a game, this was the more action packed dramatic way to do it, but seriously
Absolutely, I hate it when games come up with this genius battle plan that’s actually completely retarded… I know how we’ll get through the minefield without taking casualties… Let’s roll some trucks into them, detonating maybe 1 or 2 mines, alert all the enemy and then charge through the still very much mined mine field, while under fire from multiple MGs. As you correctly point out, all to take out something that is due to be bombed all to hell in a second anyway.
@@SlapShotRegatta22 there were black servicemen during Dday but as far as I know not in combat units, British or otherwise. One barrage balloon unit and some other support units. Dangerous enough work though.
The graphics do appear "realistic", however the visual experience per se is not realistic. This becomes quite apparent during the first conversation and exposition scenes. The concept of real is quite subjective and the baseline needs to be established first.
Yes, I agree with you. Looking into mimics and facial emotions during first conversation, it is not realistic, same fluidy and blurred COD shit. Look guys how fence is broken when he drives it by, just one unrealistic animation for every fence..
While the sound during that part was quite immersive, those fence animations were ridiculous. They'd never just shatter like that. Plus the sound of impact isn't realistic.
I was trying to find the correct words to describe this joke game but you had done it. Can't believe how people think this is a good game... looks like the same old tech game with 4k textures.
Damn, the dormitory part was intense. Made me remember that scene from _U-571_ when they are also searching for enemy survivors when suddenly one of them shoots point blank when they unfold a bed curtain.
I am not a CoD fan, but this looks actually pretty immersive! If the campaign was at least 8h long (heard it’s around 4) I would buy it just for the feeling
Yea... at launch, sure. Wait until a month in when they nerf the graphics, add in loot boxes, and a battle royale you never wanted or asked for... then they change the game icon to the shitty new battle royale as if it was all a ruse to just get you here.
soooo true. The franchise is just atrocious. I stopped playing until Modern Warfare 2019. That game was good, but it could of been great if the gave a fuck about anything than raking in cash. They never fixed sooo many problems and so on. Cold War was trash mostly also.
My favorite WW2 games were from the Brothers in Arms series, I loved how you could give orders to either the suppressing squad or the flanking squad, this game play reminded me of that. Will be picking this game up for sure. 💯
Same. Hell's Highway is a masterpiece. It truly feels like it captures those smaller battles and how tactical they were. I had a couple of friends who were probably 99th percentile level savages at COD. But I had them play Hell's Highway once and they both quit within ten minutes because they were running out into the open trying to gun down everyone in sight as quickly as possible.
You do realise Kingsley was based on a REAL LIFE BRITISH PARATROOPER Sidney Cornell something that's not tought in schools. Lady Nightingale was actually a FEMALE RUSSIAN SNIPER. THE 93RD INFANTRY were a real Corp of the US army who only had 12 KIA during their campaign. Someone sounds bitter. BROWN PEOPLE DID PLAY A ROLE IN BOTH WW1&WW2 and practically every conflict.
This is by far one of the best campaigns call of duty has had they must’ve known that Cold War was gonna suck and been working on this game is that why we had no anti-cheat in warzone but I’ll tell you I love playing the campaign so far
@@noni-lx1it having to realize that most of the people playing it have never played MW3 or prior so they really don’t have big expectations for CoD. As we see it going down in the gutter. New younger gamers man.
Ultra realistic graphics but unrealistic campaign, I never understand why they make up history and uniforms when it’s possible to have a enjoyable realistic game instead.
@@AyeMcCloud exactly, the uniforms for me are farcical, on the objectives inaccurate, they could have done it historically accurate an it would have been just as fun.
Maybe they intentionally make these crappy period shooters every few years so when they release a “modern or futuristic shooter” the masses will eat it up?
Hey Hans, that's a nice bunker we got there, with a fierce MG42, fortunately nobody is going to charge headfirst in front of us with a squad of infantry or we would be totally ineffective against such a smart tactic
Wait... This is Call of Duty Vanguard?? Not some indie concept game?? Wow... And I say this 100% honestly, I had no idea. First time see Vanguard gameplay too.
yes good lord I wish someone would make a beleivable AI, Thats one area I am going to work on later when I get around to it. For now audio and animation have me tied up, but I imagine its easier than AI
![Pacific Front | Next-Gen Ultra Realistic Graphics [4K UHD 60FPS] Call of Duty Vanguard Gameplay](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rICLJ8o5IPM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Pacific Front | Next-Gen Ultra Realistic Graphics [4K UHD 60FPS] Call of Duty Vanguard Gameplay](/img/tr.png)
Running straight into the bullets. no strategy or tactics needed. A classic COD game.
Punch a hole through is all the strategy you need
Fun as fuck tho
Exactly. People have no idea how real war looks like. It’s mostly at long range and almost never using frontal attacks
@@gareginasatryan6761 As Infantry veteran i sign upon every word you said.
People have this romantic idea of war, thinking its all about Ramboing all over the place.
Sadly i have met people after service who still never realized it.
NOT TRUE THERE IS MANY MODES AMD TACTIC OR WORK TEAM IS ALWAYS BETTER BUT NIOT NESSESARY THATS MEAN THIS IS A GAME FOR EVERY GROUP PUNK
6:35 thats really next gen climbing right there. outstanding !!!!!
hahah lol
XDDDDDDDS
In the future we don't climb. We levitate
they could at least gave him a prone animation for that LOL
its funny cuz COD uses this animation for like 10+ years. u cant use next gen and cod in a sentence lol.
I love the realistic red X that lets you know that you got a kill shot.
Everyone swore and exaggerated at the time that red dead 2 looked just like real life even when they saw the hit markers 😂
@@Salamander676 They were referring to the visual graphics and not the visual guide aids which are a must for the game to be playable to the widest market`
It still doesn’t look realistic to me
I play that game too much
@@thebugalito I see?…
Yeah I legit automatically think of a kill marker when I hear “red x” and “kill shot”
It’s not the same
Video games are made to be entertaining and you can play them comfortably wherever
Killing isn’t fun when consequences are turned off and you feel every dormant human emotion erupting out of your soul at once while you take someone else’s life
Ultra realistic and call of duty cannot be used in the same sentence. Blasphemy.
Think he means the graphics..
Not like we can even buy gpus so it doesn't even matter
This game got overhated tbh 😔
@@dvyand6674 I actually loved cold war (another game that was over-hated) but in all fairness this just looks like a copy/paste
@@zethbuckley93 yup it all depends on preference, theres always a cod for anyone
I didn't realize that this was Vanguard and my impression was "Damn this looks like a cheap ripoff of Call of Duty."
The graphics have gotten more detailed but everything else still feels 20 years old.
whats funny is the IW engine that every cod game utilizes is actually 22 years old. dont expect activision to spend a fraction of their resources developing a new one tho
I thought danger close was a game, the game reminded me of old medal of honor games
good graphics are useless without a good art style imo
Ridiculously fast paced and unrealistic. Enemy AI is on star wars "Stormtroooper" level of dumb. I do like that the player can finaly give orders though.
graphics sell, but they don't keep you playing
I don't know about these tactics. Drive a couple of trucks into a minefield, then sprint across the minefield, then charge machine guns across a fairly long & open field. Surely there's a better way. The Call of Duty AI hasn't gotten any smarter in 20 years either
the writers are basically michael bay. the more explosions and gunfire, the better.
the old AI was smart back at call of duty 1 2 3
@@Shenaniganator101 YEAH i remember they had to flank MG nests and use actual infantry tactics. it resembled brothers in arms gameplay. but now they run straight at bunkers with multiple MG's now lmao
I'm no military guy but even I thought this stuff would get you killed quickly. It'd be different if they drove a tank through the mines but those trucks only had 4 points of contact. Those machine gunners would've made cream chip beef out of those lads irl
A lot of it has to do with making the game move along while still including as much material as possible. When we did research years ago the conclusion is that people got use to not waiting, for anything and they pro created a generation that didn't know what it means to wait. Stay with me, The conclusion to the analysis is: the more realistic the game is the more you wait around gathering players, introductions, talking smack, assigning rank and position, strategy etc. Next thing ya know six hours passed and not one shot has been fired. The people seeking that experience is greatly outweighed by people wanting to kiss their ass good bye while putting the gas pedal to the mat through a mine field. Everyone has fun on a different level. My suggestion for those who except nothing less from a game that deos not represent "IRL" is the following directions" STEP 1: Turn off the gaming counsel.
A real life conversation:
The Bank: " So your idea is to drive full speed through a mine field, get out and run straight into the barrel of a purring machine gun?"
Developer: "Fuck n A right."
The Bank: "You are approved." Account limit: "endless funds."
Results 20 years later: Was it worth it it?
Fuck N A right it was.
If this was real life he wouldve died 17 times during this mission.
If this was real life, he would've died once. Unless he's hindu.
Homeboy opens one door and gets his head blown off. Meanwhile, Captain Allied runs out into the open, takes thirty shots to the dome, and keeps it moving.
@@AnoNym-zi5ty haha, nice.
I was thinking the same thing. there are parts where at least 10 Germans have a clear shot on him and do nothing lol. Star Wars Stromtrooper AI.
You die a bunch of times in the battlefield campaign portraying how indiscriminatory and ruthless war was. Doesn't matter your background story, it was so much up to luck whether you lived or didn't
my fav ultra realistic moment is at 0:45. i like how my bag flowing through my arm in real life!
Magic bag.
that explosion at 2:47 looked awful
lmao yes looks made in paint
2d explosion lmao
it's made from cardboard lmao
He took 0 damage on that one too. He was like.. that explosion is to fake, I am going through ... haha.
@@phobiazzzero4935 yooo, this takes back in time.
Great weapon handling from the MG at 5:56! 😆
The future is now old man. lol
HAHA i didn't notice that shit the first time XD
3:40 - I think this man has lost his head because he saw too much realism!
5:08 - "Hold the line!" I thought his next words were going to be "Love isn't always on time!!!"
Toto
Hahaha you are a stupid genius 😍 THAT INTRO
"Oh, oh, ohhhhh!"
COD1 or COD2 remastered would be wonderful :. (
Remake
If you want an ultra realistic WW2 shooter, play Hell Let Loose. It really doesn't get more gruesome and beautiful than that game. Insurgency Sandstorm is another damn gruesome game.
Post scriptum is the most realistic
@@AJ-yv2cr too bad it isn’t on console….
"Hell let loose" and "realistic" in the same sentence ? Give me a break
@@leyder ???
another hll cucks
3:36 Brutal but painless 🤘😜
No way in hell they would've all made it through charging two mg nests.
It’s honestly laughable.
If they have realistic bullet counts and weapon overheating, it's not impossible.
Oh no that was 4 mgs man don't forget the half tracks lol
I am digging Hell Let Loose. This seems like a campaign fun for a 7 year old.
Despite your opinion, different games and gaming in general is for all ages!
@@grep67 war games aren’t for 7 year olds my dude, especially a brutal war like ww2.
@@jmeszi4159 That depends on whether you beleive its better to hide a young mind from, representations of reality, and coddle them to be soft weakminded snowflakes.. imo
What’s Hell Let Loose? Isn’t it called Walking Simulator? 😂 All jokes aside I do enjoy Hell Let Loose, but I don’t play it when I’m looking for fast paced action, something most gamers want rather than running across and open field for 10 minutes before getting sniped.
Pretty sure the thumbnail is from Hell Let Loose which is currently the best WW2 multiplayer experience out rn
I actually like this game lol- being a WW2 buff( yes I know the historical inaccuracies) I love WW2 games.
WAW is still my favorite- wish a remastered version were to come out. Although I’ve always had fun on the multiplayer side of Call of Duty I’m more interested in the Campaigns.
Same
me to.
The Co-op campaign was nice!!
Compare this campaign and the compare the campaign of waw. Its night and day.
I 100% agree, if you enjoy the game there's no shame! I've played threw the campaign twice now and loved every moment!
I just love the historical accuracy 🤦🏽♂️
at this point we can be happy it's not a transgender black asian person with irish roots with a hook for a hand and a wooden leg.
Yea, I must have missed a few chapters, dosing off during history lessons.
Huh?
It's call of duty. It's never realistic. Why do people expect it to be. Even if they advertise it, they can twist their words.
Best part was at 5:24 when that man ate the smoke grenade. Sarge don’t give a damn.
4:04 dude giving middle finger while dying lol.
The middle finger at 4:02 / 4:03 got me 🤣🤣🤣
Cool. Any more realistic and players are gonna need counselling for combat PTSD.
Man….😂😂😂
"The horror... the horror..."
you get PTSD from the fear of death and the stress that comes from it.
@@simplex7096 There's a lot more to it than that. Also, it was a joke to imply how realistic the game is becoming. Obviously.
The can go to counseling with all the suffering Airsoft warriors.
This mission looks like the battle of Pont Du Hoc during the Normandy invasion. I went to those cliffs where the US rangers climbed up to take out the German artillery guns firing down the beaches. Awesome location to play through in a game.
Those were youth boys. History lied to you.
One bad thing Saving Private Ryan did was convince everyone that every machine gun had tracer rounds.
pretty much every machine gun *did* have tracer rounds in WWII. it's more common and exaggerated in media than in real life i suppose, but in movies and especially video games you need them as visual cues to help show the audience/player what's being shot at.
Ultra realistic GRAPHICS… 🤡
Soooo. Make a head on attack into fixed positions defended by MG42s, as well as two half tracks armed with MG34s, take 70% casualties and necessitate a very valuable troop of paras being stood down from further action, all while failing to call off naval bombardment that would have taken out the coastal guns without your intervention. You could have stayed in bed and got a better result. But that’s ‘leadership’ eh? If that were real you would have been put against a wall - and deserved it. Nice graphics though.
That first part about the mg42s happened during the war like 2 times lol
So I once heard someone ask where all the special Ed kids go after high school? And a Marine replied they become my chain of command 🤷🏻♂️
Came to the comments to see if others were question this same thing or if I'd just missed something. But yeah, why attack if it's going to be bombed anyway from a safe distance?
I mean, i know why: it's a game, this was the more action packed dramatic way to do it, but seriously
@@thatonezeldafan5275 I think you’ll find that during WW2 it happened a little more than a whole 2 times…
Absolutely, I hate it when games come up with this genius battle plan that’s actually completely retarded… I know how we’ll get through the minefield without taking casualties… Let’s roll some trucks into them, detonating maybe 1 or 2 mines, alert all the enemy and then charge through the still very much mined mine field, while under fire from multiple MGs. As you correctly point out, all to take out something that is due to be bombed all to hell in a second anyway.
Spitting on historical accuracy as usual.
Dont u understand why?
Yep! I was gonna say, pretty realistic, except for the black British combat sergeant in WWII...
@@SlapShotRegatta22 there were black servicemen during Dday but as far as I know not in combat units, British or otherwise. One barrage balloon unit and some other support units. Dangerous enough work though.
@@ConvetionalHeretic Yep, agreed
@@SlapShotRegatta22 why did they have to do that?
0:46 "Ultra realistic"
Rtx off
That explosion was my favorite realistic part at 2:46 LOL :D
duke nukem 3d style :D
@@mhezalf759 Haha yes! Spot on
The graphics do appear "realistic", however the visual experience per se is not realistic. This becomes quite apparent during the first conversation and exposition scenes. The concept of real is quite subjective and the baseline needs to be established first.
Yeah I know what you mean.. its got that same fluidy sort of arcade motion like all those COD games.
because is not graphics only HD textures
Yes, I agree with you. Looking into mimics and facial emotions during first conversation, it is not realistic, same fluidy and blurred COD shit. Look guys how fence is broken when he drives it by, just one unrealistic animation for every fence..
I like how the enemy watches you walk out into the open and gives you 5 seconds to shoot them before they consider firing.
Definitely danger close at 5:23 when you nail your squad mate in the face with a smoke nade 😆
That head destruction at 3.38 looked funny
That headshot was terrifying
3:41 True friends drag you out of the Battlefield and bring you to the hospital to give you new head.
Such a heartwarming scene
Nothing gonna replace ,only graphically a CoD 2 ,what a war game that was
11:25 - attack of the bunnynazis o.O
Can t understand those games in 2021 where you still can't lean left or right behinde corners.
I'm glad COD went back to its roots!
I had no idea cooks played such a central role on the battlefield.
0:43 yeah the pouch of this dude is realy ultra realistic ! :D
"Ultra realistic" - proceeds to take 10 mg42 rounds directly through windshield and manages to dive out unharmed
"ultra realistic graphics"
unrealistic weapons everywhere I had an anxiety attack
Isnt that thumbnail from Hell let loose ? A far superior game !
3:30 this part 😭😂
1:30 look at how ultra realistic the fence gets blown apart
While the sound during that part was quite immersive, those fence animations were ridiculous. They'd never just shatter like that. Plus the sound of impact isn't realistic.
@@Austin-t3k exactly my point
For me last great CoD it was 2012 Black Ops 2 ,absolutely awesome title
Use the half track "smoke thrown into allies face" half track drives off at 40mph
CoD finest hour had a better story smh. And more realistic missions lol
Damn bro you didn’t gotta say it like that 🤦♂️🤣💀🤣💀
Finest Hour was so damn good
Here economic crisis in my country now. buy a graphic card is impossible now thanks for uploading this i am really enjoyed 😢😢
Which country?
@@FA-jx7zc sri lanka. but before 2023 it will be normal
Absurdly unrealistic but amusing all the same... Love the Star Wars Stormtrooper aim and AI of the Germans.
Its somehow sad it still looks like a Comic game, even in 4k
I was trying to find the correct words to describe this joke game but you had done it.
Can't believe how people think this is a good game... looks like the same old tech game with 4k textures.
0:47 so real lol
I find it amusing how battlefield 1, 2016, ON LASTGEN CONSOLE, looks better
5:23 nice smoke throw!
Oh yeah, just charge a machine gun nest...
3:37 amazing
Damn, the dormitory part was intense. Made me remember that scene from _U-571_ when they are also searching for enemy survivors when suddenly one of them shoots point blank when they unfold a bed curtain.
2004 to this. What's the next 20 years gonna look like.
Try playing throw ahome theater system with SVS ULTRA PB 16 sub woffer, its scary as it is fun at the same time.
Nice woffer 😉😂
8:42 You didn't pick up the STG44???
I am not a CoD fan, but this looks actually pretty immersive! If the campaign was at least 8h long (heard it’s around 4) I would buy it just for the feeling
Bought the game yesterday, I started the campaign at 4pm, and finished it at 11pm… on veteran. Imo it was like a 7/10
11:27 'It’s-a Me, Mario!
I didn't know they had GoPro's during WWII...
LMAO
Now you do.
everyone is so rich, the cool ones brag, give the computer a good one😍👍
Yea... at launch, sure. Wait until a month in when they nerf the graphics, add in loot boxes, and a battle royale you never wanted or asked for... then they change the game icon to the shitty new battle royale as if it was all a ruse to just get you here.
nerf the graphics after launch? lol wut?
soooo true. The franchise is just atrocious. I stopped playing until Modern Warfare 2019. That game was good, but it could of been great if the gave a fuck about anything than raking in cash. They never fixed sooo many problems and so on. Cold War was trash mostly also.
Couldn't agree more. These graphics arnt next gen anyways.
Best way to defeat an enemy, run straight at them whilst there in an entrenched machine gun position
Yes. Above all the Ultra Realistic Enemy AI. 🤣
I love how the dude is trying to help his wounded comrade and this guy comes up and says "get up man" and goes along
Why did they bother taking it if they knew it was going to be bombarded anyway
MP40 with 64 bullets and a drum magazine .. ? what in Newton's name am i witnessing
My favorite WW2 games were from the Brothers in Arms series, I loved how you could give orders to either the suppressing squad or the flanking squad, this game play reminded me of that. Will be picking this game up for sure. 💯
Same. Hell's Highway is a masterpiece. It truly feels like it captures those smaller battles and how tactical they were. I had a couple of friends who were probably 99th percentile level savages at COD. But I had them play Hell's Highway once and they both quit within ten minutes because they were running out into the open trying to gun down everyone in sight as quickly as possible.
You will be very annoyed with this game. It’s all visuals and that’s it.
3:37 made my jaw drop, def wasnt expecting that
thats the only thing so far ive seen that i like
Realistic. Germans always runs with 5 guys in one row into Machinegun Fire🤡🤡
Absolutely, the AI in the campaign are about as smart as a bag of rocks.
It's realistic graphics not realistic npcs bruh
Full squad of men, vehicles and weapons all within sight of the enemy in the first scene. Yeah uLtRa ReAlIsTiC
More like WW2 fantasy with a twist of over representation wokeness.
You do realise Kingsley was based on a REAL LIFE BRITISH PARATROOPER Sidney Cornell something that's not tought in schools. Lady Nightingale was actually a FEMALE RUSSIAN SNIPER. THE 93RD INFANTRY were a real Corp of the US army who only had 12 KIA during their campaign. Someone sounds bitter. BROWN PEOPLE DID PLAY A ROLE IN BOTH WW1&WW2 and practically every conflict.
@@alexandrerrobinson6720 he meant how retarded the campaign is and unrealistic
@@maximtudor9490 just like the first mission ?
@@alexandrerrobinson6720 they never served in the Parachute Rgt during ww2 though
@@G4x5da they who?
6:47 these types of gunners are strategically horrible, because the person you are shooting can easily come from your blind sides and pull a sneaky
11:26 that was a super mario jump
Hhahah xD
2:47 Blast in front of him and did not die, very Realistic :D
This is by far one of the best campaigns call of duty has had they must’ve known that Cold War was gonna suck and been working on this game is that why we had no anti-cheat in warzone but I’ll tell you I love playing the campaign so far
Can you elaborate what's so great about it?
Cold War's campaign was far better, not saying this one is bad.
@@noni-lx1it having to realize that most of the people playing it have never played MW3 or prior so they really don’t have big expectations for CoD. As we see it going down in the gutter. New younger gamers man.
@@aszczepaniak1015 In my opinion even the original CoD from 2003 is a far superior game. I'm actually afraid what they have in store in the future.
@@noni-lx1it it is. I remember playing that on the ps2. Cod 3 was my favorite. But even big red one, finest hour, and United offensive were all good.
If it were so realistic, you wouldn't be reloading after every 8 shots fired...what a waste of a mag!!
Hello from Sweden 🇸🇪
Я был у Вас, привет из Казахстана!
Why do these games always have completely a-historical web gear when having historical gear would be so simple?
Ultra realistic graphics but unrealistic campaign, I never understand why they make up history and uniforms when it’s possible to have a enjoyable realistic game instead.
Agreed we want to play it as if we could get the experience of back then ect and relive their stories.
@@AyeMcCloud exactly, the uniforms for me are farcical, on the objectives inaccurate, they could have done it historically accurate an it would have been just as fun.
Am I the only one who recognized Simon Quarterman immediately in the begining of the video?
CoD WW2 suffered from very synthetized, plastic and 'tiny' sound design. Luckily, this time they absolutely nailed audio layer
3:39 clean death , nice.
Maybe they intentionally make these crappy period shooters every few years so when they release a “modern or futuristic shooter” the masses will eat it up?
Hey Hans, that's a nice bunker we got there, with a fierce MG42, fortunately nobody is going to charge headfirst in front of us with a squad of infantry or we would be totally ineffective against such a smart tactic
3:46 textbook tactics.
Taffy gets his head blown off, so let's all charge through en masse into a hail of fire.
They did do that tbf irl
Oh yeah? Got any other better ideas?
Wait... This is Call of Duty Vanguard?? Not some indie concept game?? Wow... And I say this 100% honestly, I had no idea. First time see Vanguard gameplay too.
It’s not very good
Don't think this qualifies as a game. Short linear constricted interaction within a mini series of clips.
This gameplay made me shed tears, reminded me how many people die during the war but we have yet to learn.
В целом очень красиво но не хватает хардкорности какой-то.
Graphics & animations are much more developed nowadays but the new challenge is to make the AI look alive and not just waiting for players to shoot.
yes good lord I wish someone would make a beleivable AI, Thats one area I am going to work on later when I get around to it. For now audio and animation have me tied up, but I imagine its easier than AI
in real life the guy playing would not last more than 5 min.
😂... thats why it's a game
that is why physics dont apply that much. Not even a single minute youre survive or go further if you hit by a bullet in your limbs.
All the artifects are pretty standard COD (eg: weapons snapping, tracers through walls, hands clipping on objects).
very realist, its full of wokeness too like in reality.
3:39 RIP Thomas Jones. He let it go to his head.