“The James Webb Telescope Discovers Strange Galaxies That Are Older than the Big Bang!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มิ.ย. 2024
- The James Webb telescope has now found the first real evidence for the mirror universe! Galaxies that appear older than the universe actually come from a counter-world where the physical forces are similar to ours. What is happening now? Are we now entering unknown dimensions of the multiverse for the first time and what might we find there? The answers to this question are pushing us to the limits of normality, challenging our consciousness and possibly catapulting us into a completely new reality. This could possibly mean the end of science as we know it!
![Everything NASA Discovered from James Webb's First Year in Space [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nbDQEo0uA0Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT]"เศรษฐา" โดนบีบให้ลาออก เผยดีลลับ "ทักษิณ" ต้องต่อโปร ไม่งั้นเจอจุดจบ! I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XlH3k81dxmE/mqdefault.jpg)
It's the Trisolarans fucking with us.
nah, otherwise they would already be teabagging us with sophons
@mos1ju513 they can only teabag a small number of people at a time since they only have two
thank you chatGPT for your verbose word soup
Extra dimensions can be neither proven nor denied. That's the case for metaphysical objects too. The existence of very old galaxies indicates that the universe is older than 13.8 billion years.
☝️☝️
Or it indicates universe and matter already exists before big bang.. big bang was an event in this already existing universe
@@daveriddlelin9327if we're looking back at the first galaxies of the universe then wouldn't our galaxy be older?
@@daveriddlelin9327if we're looking at the first galaxies of the universe then wouldn't our galaxy be older?
@@sandrapage2780 no... Looking out and back in time tells us nothing of age of our galaxy
@@sandrapage2780 Age of our galaxy, i.e., Milky Way Galaxy, is 13.61 billion years.
JWST just called - it seems the universe might indeed be a ‘Designed’ masterpiece, not just a cosmic accident! 🌌😄
One thing that's always kind of Concerned me, that I've thrown in the back of my mind, is the idea that certain scientific theories are dismissed - not because there's not enough evidence to prove they're true, but simply because they upset and upend the already established status quo of science.
Think about it, imagine being a professor and having your entire field of science (that you've thrown your whole life work into) itself thrown into question because the foundational science which your theories are based on are themselves proven no longer fact?
My point is religion isn't the only thing that stops/slows science. People within the scientific community being too lazy or jealous also harm advances and truth.
The fact that any particular subject could fall into this problem is terrifying to me.
SO agree. It's a known problem that isn't talked about
Thats how science is supposed to work. You hace a hypotesis you test it, if the the results make sense and prove what you were trying to explain then its accepted, if it doesnt prove the hypotesis then its discarted. If a scientific theory is dismissed its because it doesnt have evidence to back it.
@@ernesto3251 rinse and repeat with new data
It is crazy to me that webb can detect those galaxies that apparently formed only 200-300million years after the big bang event, but not the event itself, such an event would cover every angle of webbs telescope, unless it was lightless, which is impossible.. the fact that light travels always at the same speed regardless of scale kinda makes me suspicious about there ever being a big bang event. Or we just did the math wrong on when it happened
I am not a physicist, but why the big bang modeled as a bell? Should the universe be expanded in all directions after the explosion?
The "bell" shape you mentioned is often associated with inflationary models of the universe's early expansion. Inflation is a hypothetical period of extremely rapid expansion thought to have occurred just after the Big Bang. During this phase, the universe expanded exponentially, smoothing out irregularities and leading to the homogeneity and isotropy we observe today.
The "bell" shape arises because inflationary models suggest that regions of the universe expanded faster than others, leading to a multiverse scenario where different regions have different properties. This shape doesn't mean the expansion occurs only in one direction; rather, it illustrates the rapid and uneven expansion during the inflationary epoch.
The bell shape is designed to give you the idea, how else would they demonstrate it?
The axial direction represents time. It is difficult to model 4 dimensions on a 2D page.
TACO BELL BIG BANG PRIMORDIAL BURRITO 🌯 👹❤️
Brother the bell isnt showing the shape of expansion its showing the speed 😭 its a graph
So, in other words, with the JWST, the more you learn, the less you know? At least, that is how I understand this.
Nah, the more you know, the less you understand.
I don't get it, distance is based on the assumption that particles ejected from the big bang only travelled at the speed of light! But given the cosmos was contracted there was every chance that the speed of light was not a restriction and was exceeded. As more data comes in it may be possible to estimate what the true expansion velocity was of the outermost particles of the big bang matter.
The big bang happened in this universe.. it didn't create it..
😂
There's a lot of big bang going on
Can’t cope
Big Bang is just a theory man. ⚖️
WHAT CAUSED IT?!🗣😭
Why would another dimension be visible? “Hey, look at that dimension over here!”
“DBZ Galaxy” Goku is officially canon.
💀
Hearing "I heard you're strong" while sleeping would be traumatic
I make it a point to fact check any information coming from Simply Science. With good reason. Much of the time more simple than science.
In mathematics orthogonal equations cancel each other out. It is possible matter takes on similar forms that prevents them from interacting together except through gravity. Could orthogonal matter be dark matter?
And the James web telescope is pictureing the galaxy and their activated frequency color's..
Based on 'what' you count no. of universes ? Time or distance ?
Bro there is simply no time in the universe. But brain can't get it
Yes
I gave up. pretty sure it's God now I don't think this could be created on accident by accidental forces. nonsense all around. head blank and I'm tired.
At about the 9:05 mark, the narrator states 'it has become clear to many'. I would ask this site define 'many' and please cite the names of the 'many'. But I know they don't have it. Like millions of sites, they just throw crap out there with their own personal opinions saying that 'many' believe as they do. When you have some actual evidence, or at least some viable, peer reviewed scientific published papers instead of making videos just to get likes, get back to us. Or have one of your 'many' email us.
😂😂😂😂
Many is the name of just one person
I’ll email you
The scientists will replace on theory with another, which in itself will be fascinating. At the end of the day, I hope that i can understand it.
The big bang might have occurred in our universe. But there may be many more universes. It indicates that universe is not credited by big bang. It is not created nor destroyed. It just existed.
Big bang was just an event in this universe.. not the beginning..
What we know and are going through as life is another persons dream .
If we're looking back to the first galaxies of the universe then wouldn't our galaxy be older?
Pretend a galaxy is 7Billion years away.
1 year = 1 light year(how far light travels in a year)
The light that’s reaching us now is 7 billion years and the older it is the redder it gets. When you look at that galaxy you see it as it was 7 billion years ago, which means that it will it take us another 7 billion years to see it how it was right now
No because we are seeing the light that's been traveling for billions of years, by the time it reaches us all that time has already passed meaning it's much older
Suppose the average density of the universe was higher nearer the Big Bang, meaning the gravitational constant would be different implying that light travels SLOWER nearer the Big Bang. So that the light seen by Webb has travelled slower for the first part of its trip.
If we're looking at the first galaxies of the universe wouldn't our galaxy be older
Light is not slowed by gravity, though it could be bent by it.
@@AlphaW0LF Yes it is.That’s how gravitational lending works
lensing
@@keithtwort9655 speed of light is always constant in a vacuum, no matter what. Even if you're moving at that speed it is always constant. But you are right in thinking that bent light could take longer, not due to slowing but due to taking a longer path to reach us.
Maybe most of the galaxy materials were sucked into its massive centerd blackhole throughout the years
Is out there still have human like us living on another planet on other galaxy ? ....who more way advanced..scary
I'm here to learn. What was outside the alleged "singularity? Define "nothing"....
Honestly I think a lot of things are purposely hidden or it would hurt our brains.
After the dinosaurs are gone, all of this new data will still be around. Only then can we start over to explore new paths. We cannot defy observation to prop up pet theories.
Black Hole Multiverse
A hypothesis by James Arasmith
I have not, nor do I know how to do the math to verify or falsify my hypothesis. I will, however, go through the logic behind my hypothesis based on my understanding of the science. If anyone can point out any mistakes in my understanding, or could do the math that could verify or falsify my hypothesis, please let me know. Thank you.
What I think I understand about the science
1. It is my understanding that within a black hole all directions in space lead to the singularity.
2. It is my understanding that within a black hole all of the black hole’s history is accessible.
3. It is my understanding that within a spinning black hole there is a toroidal shaped area of “normal space/time.
4. It is my understanding that elliptical galaxies contain mostly type 2 stars and have very little gas and dust.
5. It is my understanding that JWST found fully formed galaxies shortly after the Big Bang, galaxies that should not be able to exist so shortly after the Big Bang.
6. It is my understanding that the only explanation we have for the accelerated expansion of the universe is dark energy, something we have not been able to directly observe.
7. It is my understanding that the only explanation we have for the rotation of stars in the outer edges of galaxies is dark matter, something we have not been able to directly observe.
8. It is my understanding that particles exist in a probability distribution.
9. It is my understanding that, due to the nature of this probability state, a particle will interact with itself when passing through the slits of the double slit experiment.
My hypothesis
Given the nature of the double slit experiment, it is logical to assume that space/time is not 4 dimensional. Rather, space/time is 6 dimensional. 3 dimensions of space and 3 dimensions of time, where linear time is on the z axis, possibility is on the x axis, and probability is on the y axis. This would imply that gravity would warp, not only linear time, but possibility and probability as well. This could potentially be what leads to the collapse of the wave function.
The question is, if the particle exists in multiple places, is the mass of the particle the same, actual mass in each of the positions or is the mass divided proportional to the probability of its location? For this hypothesis, let’s assume the latter. The reason being, if gravity affects probability, the less probable state should have less gravitational influence.
So what does all this have to do with a black hole multiverse?
At this point, I will ask you to completely reimagine the Big Bang. Imagine a big bang that created the mass for just one galaxy. The mass expands and cools. After some time, gravity overcomes expansion. All of the matter in this universe is gravitationally pulled back towards the singularity of the Big Bang. Fusion begins at the center of the mass and the first star, a type 3 super giant, is formed. Because this star has the mass of the entire universe, it goes supernova very quickly, triggering the second explosion of the universe.
Because of the immense heat, the star does not release any gas. Rather, the supernova is an explosion of plasma. This plasma discharge forms droplets, the creation of second generation stars. These stars expand to form an ellipse. As the second generation stars eventually go supernova, they release gas and dust.
As expansion slows to a stop, the universe begins to orbit around the singularity at the center of the universe. A pinwheel pattern forms as all of the matter in the universe begins is very slow decaying orbit back towards the singularity.
Now, imagine this all taking place within the “normal” 4 dimensional space within a spinning black hole. What would we see when we looked outside of that bubble of normal space? We would see the entire 3 dimensional history of the black hole. We would see our universe’s probability distribution. We would see the multiverse. And, because all directions in space lead to the singularity, the gravity of said singularity would cause the probability distribution to expand in all directions as the distribution is actually collapsing into the singularity.
This model would explain why we would see fully formed galaxies so soon after the Big Bang. Because, from the very formation of a Black Hole, its 3 dimensional time is accessible.
Note: I mention how elliptical galaxies and spiral galaxies fit in my model. But I left out irregular galaxies. This is because I’m not sure how they fit in. Originally, I thought they would form at the equilibrium between the expanding elliptical and contracting spiral galaxies. However, it is now my understanding that irregular galaxies have considerably less mass than other galaxies. Therefore, my best conclusion that would still fit this model is that they are the result of the probability distribution interacting with itself. In other words, they are the result of galaxy collisions.
Testing the hypothesis
First, the math: can Einstein’s field equations be modified for a 6 dimensional space/time on both sides of the equation? If so, does it fit what we observe in quantum physics?
Does the geometry of a galaxy residing in the toroidal normal space within a spinning black hole account for dark matter? Does it explain the apparent lack of mass?
Conclusion
I honestly doubt that my hypothesis is correct. Honestly, it’s an insane notion. However, it is an intriguing thought experiment. And if you have read this far, thank you for taking this thought experiment with me.
Assuming these measurements are accurate, there is sufficient data indicating the universe is much older than the 15 billion years mark. 🤔It is safe to assume the universe is closer to 100 billion years old.
No way these scientists are ret-conning the Big Bang…
We only see how things used to be
C
Everything exists at the same time
Wow at this rate the JWST will spot Elvis.
What if time, the way we think about it, does not exist.
What we see is what others show us in seeing the pictures of a boxed in universe for we humans are like ants we see in our world
Whatever we see is the 'past'
Madness
Here for all the keyboard astrophysicists to tell us all how dumb we are
Light doesn't travel but is magnified by dark energy throughout space. It is heat resonating outwardly as heat waves striking energy outside of entanglement of mass as amplification of magnification. Heat is always present in energy transference through mass and space itself as resonating waves. Energy is liquidity infinity and is pressure in perpetual motion passing through space and mass in chain reactions until resistance is overcome by open space itself and returns to dark energy as a weak external magnetic field filled with dark energy. Space neutralizes heat as degrees of pressure temperature equalization throughout space. Pressure heat temperature defines the liquidity of illusionary solidity of liquidity as energy in equalization to distance traveling and force of pressure. Light is only present in resistance to energy pressure transference as heat waves. Heat waves in space and atmospheres. Energy transference of pressure is heat. The more pressure exerted the greater heat transference as sparking electrons of light. When you look at stars, you see the heat transference of energy. Heat damage by looking directly at the magnification of heat burning the retina. Distance is equalization to force. Greater distance in magnetic fields less magnification of force. Space is a weak external magnetic field filled with dark energy heat transference. The sun is close to the earth's magnetic field, and heat transference is stronger than other stars. Distance is always equal to the force of pressure. The nucleus of magnetic fields is strongest and is the least distance traveling in a magnetic field. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Friction causes sparks of striking electrons as currents in repulsion to force of pressure known as weight. Table of elements proves hypothesis. Hydrogen has the strongest magnetic field of force flow currents and least distance traveling cycling circulation patterns as internal magnetic fields grounding currents through the nucleus as mass. Density can't exceed repulsion within it. Repulsion is the greatest force of physics. It doesn't collapse from pressure. It is the creator of pressure known as repulsion to propulsion from the repulsion of energy within and without entanglement of mass as renewable perpetual motion of pressure known as force of weight as heat loss or gain. Absorption or loss heat is energy as frequencies as color of mass in currents of energy flow grounding into itself as liquidity to illusionary solidity of liquidity. Infinity liquidity bottle necked energy trickling through mass as dammed up currents into illusionary solidity of liquidity energy. When currents are released, pressure is lost, and equalization is maintained. Hydrogen under extreme pressure expands into helium. More occupational space and more energy transference. Weaker magnetic field as mass expands. Galaxies expand around these magnetic fields of external energy hurricanes and tornadoes at the monopole of repulsion within the nucleus or core. Proximity mass loses its ability to ground energy into itself and returns it to external energy flow towards the greater external magnetic field. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Magnetism bonding force of pressure. The closer to the core, the greater the force and the least distance traveling equalization. Galaxies spinning all the energy within its magnetic field, including energy outside and within entanglement within its field.
I like what you’re talking about BUT YOU PUT TOO MUCH👹❤️
Why should Lord Ramu be older than the big bang? He is unnecessary.
Anyone else blocking the ads on here??
Fcking bozo 129 rupees super cheap yt premium, life is short don't waste it watching ads
The space's dimension is infinity beyond distance and that the body existe of God with soul of light.
It's time to toss out ridiculous Big 'Bang theory. There are also many assumptions made regarding red-shift and it's interpretation. There's a lot of fundamental physics that has been overlooked or purposely ignored.
Maybe the universe just always has been
That would go against the law of entropy and all of bunch of universal physic laws.
maybe it's God?
The JWST never discovered a galaxy older than the big bang.
Then your 3 year old boy can been married and have a 2 year old girl
@@drnnnkk what?
We live in space just like inside the ball while on the top is God dwelling exist .
I'm going to Disney world
Is anyone considering that the big bang THEORY could be wrong?
I know it is.
On the one hand we're told nothing can move faster than the speed of light...
Then we're told the galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light... Make up your mind. The more people profess to know stuff the dumber they look.
@@joethomas4940 there's hundreds of different theories so yeah there's some that say that things move faster than the speed of light, it doesn't come from one person, it comes from thousands of different scientist all around the world with their own way of thinking, some doesn't make sense at all, some does, so there's no really mind to be made up
Big bang happened in this universe. It didn't create it.
@@joethomas4940And, yes the expansion cause some galaxies to move away faster than the speed of light, but it's not actually them moving at that speed, it's the space between them
another universe "kissed" our universe spilling some of it's contents inside!
The big bang is two universes having a baby.
You guy going to have to make up your damn minds regarding this topic. It either happened or it didn’t.
Bruh it's impossible to "know" this is incomprehensible to us humans. We can only theorize or guess
They won't let that happen. They were hoping webb is going to prove the BigBang, but it did the opposite. And now every scientist who staked their whole life in the BigBang theory is doing everything to put a stop to the telescope.
When will astrophysicists stop talking out their arses?
The word of God in the bible is right , the more we discover the more we see the bible is completely right . Genesis 1-1 " In the beginning God Created the heavens and the earth " .
the church also burned a man who said all planets orbit around the sun.. Yea totally need to use science to explain primitive religion.. Down to the smallest coincidence, hmm must he god 😂😂😂😂
Well shit:)
I can see why this is not viral. Because the images are all AI created....I doubt one image in this video is real!
A lot are from the Hubble scope. Yes they’re “not real” as in we can’t see it like that. It’s infrared.. The Hubbles images were then converted to RGB( what our eyes can see).
So IF we could see infrared, those colorful images would look exactly like that to us. In a way, they’re incredibly real.
@@VA-gu1jq I don't doubt your integrity...but, when I see a color image perfectly picture framed by celestial cloud, it's not real!
Frst
Ok dude chill with the “this can end science” 😂 tf?? It’s like the old saying “advanced science looks like manic to fools” 😂😂😂 like dude this stuff exists and has existed, the only thing is that we just found out about it. 😂 chill, everything will continue as normal with just new math and stuff being done to understand this new information 😂
Instaed of saying or writting big bag bang, read the first few versus of genisus of the Bible. No more explaination need after that
8:57 "The only theory that comes close is string theory..."
aaaaaaand you lost me. String theory itself has been more than discredited for decades now.
Yeah this channel is absolutely ai generated garbage. Block these spammers.
Y people want to more athirst,
But u must fail
big bang of bullshit theory's 😂
The Evangelical weirdos are gonna take this and run with it
Jesus Christ loves u and whats u to accept him 🙏🏽❤️🔥he died and rose again for ur forgiveness accept Christ
Bruh why do y’all have to come on the science videos and say this type of shit? It’s just condescending at this point.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
thank you. yk it was comments like yours on videos like this that got me to accept God is real. this universe is too much to grasp. I will never have all of the answers and I won't need to bc GOD has it all figured out. I thought God was outside somehow of the universe. now I think he is also inside creation bc of things like this there just is no possible way for this to be understood by humanity. thank you Jesus. John 3:16-17
God created everything
What created god?
If god created everything, that would imply that something created god as well.
@@sage.697
great question but the answer is simple God lives outside time space and matter so that means he doesn't get effected by it like you and me
think of it this way humans created computers humans does not live inside computer so humans does not get effected by the laws inside the computers for example
God does not get effected by time so that means the law of everything has a beginning and an end does not apply to him
Which came first the chicken or the egg?
@@sage.697if something created "god" then thats God dummy
Really?who gives a rip.