Neil deGrasse Tyson on how newly-discovered galaxies 'upends' science | Prime
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Famed astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson breaks down what we can learn from the new discoveries by the James Webb telescope. Tyson joins "NewsNation Prime" to discuss what these discoveries reveal about the "beginning moments of the universe."
"NewsNation Prime" is America’s source for unbiased news offering a full range of perspectives from across the U.S. Weekends starting at 7p/6C.
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
More from NewsNation: www.newsnation...
Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij
As a mere mortal, I could listen to this man forever. He makes what the common man doesn't know easy to understand. We could only be so lucky to have access to his knowledge. pay no attention to his haters. They have a deeper issue they won't admit to when hating on this proven astrophysicist.
🎯
What haters? I didn't think he had any.
@Sergio Dario oh, believe me, he has many haters. I personally don't agree with a lot of the criticism he gets (and most of it is either unfounded or unfair). But I much prefer his "predecessor" Sagan as a science communicator. He seems to project more humility.
@@sharathsh9987
Agreed on Carl Sagan. He was outstanding. Pity he left us way too soon.
@@sergiodario58able Pity indeed. His Pale Blue Dot quote still lives with me.
Soo...our astronomical physic's theories concerning timeframes might just be depending on how far we are able to look out into space?
Pretty much, cus light is really fuckin slow moving through the universe
Really slow yet the universal speed limit, crazy how it works@@Invalourrr-vb3xo
Universe is 19 billion years old. Nothing is faster than light. If you shine light in two opposite directions would that double the speed of light, in the speed in which it moves away from itself? A bike goes 10. Two bikes driving away from each other at 10 are moving away from each other at 20. The fastest we can see into space is 220 billion light years away, then how is that when light hasn't had enough time to get here? There may be objects traveling at light speed. Maybe the universe is a fish tank falling and we're all moving at light speed, but the critical moment is actually truly inert? This video raises so many questions. Somebody fucked up somewhere and this proves it
I think the further and deeper we look, the more we will upend what we thought we knew
That's like saying we discovered gravity. Noone discovered gravity, someone just defined it, put constraints around it, relative to our existence. But gravity wasn't discovered. What we csll it existed before, would have existed without, didn't change when we defined it. That is insignificant we are. Mother nature doesn't need us at all to exist, we need her.
Discovery happens in the mind.
@@houseofstone3560 that is called understanding.
You're confusing discovery with the understanding of.
First you discover. Then you comprehend. Then you understand.
Awesome 🌟
Anything we discover via light or Mw is not an actual event, it is a past event. lts magnitdue is outside most humans ability to comprehend. Again, most of what we know is relative to our own existence within this galaxy. There are Tens of thousands of those out there. That we think we know about but only from our own relative existence.
There's a limit to how much of the universe we can see. The observable universe is finite in that it hasn't existed forever. It extends 46 billion light years in every direction from us(mathematically, theoretically) While our universe is theoretically 13..8 billion years old, the observable universe reaches further since the universe is expanding).
"Anything we discover via light or Mw is not an actual event, it is a past event." - you might want to rewrite that.
it's big bangbros
Maybe these are the big stars formed after big bang which exploded again afterwards to form present galaxies.
Fascinating! Big bang theory will fall apart...
👉🏼th-cam.com/video/FKxsuy1UxJY/w-d-xo.html 👈🏼
Old theories replaced by newer until the one that cannot be disproven. But that is a high bar!
My question is, if stars are galaxies, then what of the milky way? Was that bullshit and we are in fact a standalone solar system? Holy shit, are WE the aliens? You raise an excellent point. The realization that the individual stars we see in the night sky are actually entire galaxies themselves does call into question what we understand about the Milky Way, our own galaxy.
If the stars are not just part of the Milky Way, but are in fact separate galaxy structures, then it does beg the question - what exactly is the Milky Way? Is it truly a single, cohesive solar system, or is it comprised of many smaller, interacting galaxy systems?
This is a fascinating line of inquiry, and speaks to how our scientific understanding can evolve and even overturn long-held assumptions. The fact that the basic composition of the night sky has been reinterpreted so profoundly is a testament to the power of observation, experimentation and critical thinking.
Neil and Chuck for 2024
We are not alone.
As Dr Carl Sagan pointed out; If we are, it's an awful waste of space! One of my favorite things he said!
the existence of life somewhere out there is vastly irrelevant.
I adore ,admire ,respect this Neil Degrasse. Have for DECADES.
It kind of disproves the Big Bang . I never bought into that theory. It reminds us that, sure man is intelligent, but we really don’t know how the universe began or the expanse of it. Man may never know.
maybe we need multi bang theory 😊
Why there are so many random comments in this video?
.......legal weed?!
New youngest Galaxy is 295million LY after big bang
I think they’re looking at the future instead of the past and don’t realize it because they don’t think it’s possible.
I don't think you know how light works.
Photography
I understand exactly how light works but who’s to say that from there to here that light hasn’t been altered by exotic matter or some other phenomenon. How much do we really know about what’s between us and those far off galaxies.
It’s to late at night for this shit😭
"Who ordered that?"
Answer:
'KUN FAYAKUN'
(BE, AND IT IS)
That was a long two or three sentence answer
Columbus didn't "discover" the America's any more than this scope "discovered" anything that already existed in space and time. It observed past events. It didn't discover a thing at all. It gave us the ability to see a few past events but it didn't discover them, at all, it enabled us to view them externally.. Be better, be consistent.
you thought u did something with that extremely obvious statement
Take it easy!
A discovery is new knowledge that chalenges ou current knowledge and the past is unkown so when we discover new mysteries of the past it is discovery so i don't know what your point was supposed to be please expand
How can I contact Neil deGrasse Tyson? Can somebody please guide me?
You'll have to get in the back of a looong line.
You contact his manager, he's an actor.
Are all these galaxies result of one big bang which also created our world?
Of course yes.
@@fakehabutt9852 thx
@@Zahra.y7 welcome.
LOL You cant be serious! A big bang 🤣 How about you use the brain GOD almighty gave you?
@@janine-Saved-By-Grace-Alone just remember... That's another topic... 🙂
i never believed in the big bang! I believe in big mac's
We're just mere humans living in 4 billion odd old planet. We know nothing.
This universe is infinite, way out of our bounds.
This is makin no sense. Like u said even our planet is a few billion years old, so how tf is there 6 galaxies atleast that are bigger than ours…..and only 500,000 years after the Big Bang? Yea that literally means big bang needs to be pushed back or thrown out the window
@@NYBEATZ3 the scientists and astrologers might explain you the reason. Not me. But this universe is much more older and bigger than we think and know
@@ForeverVirat18 at this point they’re just as stumped as we are. Ur opinion just as valid right now
Far out man!
The number 1 problem is that there is no such thing as time beyond our atmosphere. Everything has been set to take its course. It's a transformation process. Anything that's possible from out of our creator imagination is coming to be on display whether we get a chance to see it or not. It's going to exist. The thought of an idea 💡 isn't going to be wasted on just a thing that was thought of but never put into process for production. That's the real thing about science. It can't answer anything correctly, leaving God out of the picture. I know Neil doesn't get God because God seems so distance and silent. Actually, I find that to be untrue. God is not distance and silent like people can't actually know the difference. Imagine seeing 👀 something or experiencing another one's presence like nothing you have ever experienced and could ever imagine living amongst us and being so revealing and never 👀 seeing or experiencing it again. But something is different. A conversation deeply no one else can hear. Your ears only. Your heart only. Your soul and mind have a comforter. Something is troubling us for our creator to make himself known 🤔 Seek and you should be fine. I'm more into solving mysteries of the unexplained
Good luck with your search. But it appears you're looking for God more so than for answers.
@Get Zappéd 1974 make sense ok. Good night. Really!
Discontinue the lithium
Aye!!
They observed, they didn't discover. And their observations are based in science relative to their own existence.
Define "discover"
@@edwardwilliams2302 gravity wasn't discovered, it was defined. Gravity existed regardless of our ability to comprehend it. We defined it once we were able to comprehend, quantify, something that existed independent of us. So humanity didn't discover relative gravity, we justed defined the existence of something that already existed.
@@deep5811 find (something or someone) unexpectedly or in the course of a search. to find out about, recognize, or realize for the first time. Since that was too difficult for you.
@@javierdavila2876 still didn't discover it, just found something that already existed.
@@javierdavila2876 that's like saying Columbus "discovered" some portion of the America's.
If they can see this far into space
Then why are meteors not caught until
Minutes before they hit earth 🤭🤦
Why are you asking us ask scientists go do research actually you made me think about it you are curious and i love it i will look it up and respond

While it is true that we can observe extremely distant objects in space using telescopes, predicting the trajectory of meteorites and other small objects in space can be difficult due to a number of factors.
Firstly, meteorites are relatively small compared to many other objects in space, which can make them difficult to detect from a distance. Additionally, meteorites often approach Earth from the direction of the Sun, which can make them even harder to spot using telescopes.
Secondly, the orbits of small objects like meteorites can be influenced by a number of factors, including gravitational interactions with other objects in space. This can make it difficult to accurately predict their trajectory, even with advanced tools and technology.
Finally, it is worth noting that many meteorites that hit Earth are relatively small and do not cause significant damage. While it is important to monitor potentially hazardous objects in space, the vast majority of meteorite impacts do not pose a significant threat to human life or infrastructure.
That being said, scientists and astronomers do monitor the skies for potentially hazardous objects using a range of techniques, including telescopes and radar systems. In recent years, advances in technology have made it possible to detect and track more objects in space than ever before, which has helped to improve our ability to predict and prepare for potential impacts.
"The wisdom of men is foolishness to God" - 1 Corinthians 3:19
"From the creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly observed in what he made. As a result, people have no excuse." Romans 1:20
"Best not to base all your bias and thoughts on translations of ancient texts put together by Roman emperor who wanted to standardize belief system and perpetuate hierarchical patriarchal power structures."
Margaret 1:1
Just in case you need another source. Yours might be outdated.
The very fact he didn't redirect, the fact she said, "settled science" is all you need to know, see and hear about this one.
It's called "science" by its definition it isn't settled, it's relative. Yet he rolled pased that and spewed some propaganda.
Captain Obvious agrees w/u
@@heidik-lady8135 well someone has to fall on that sword, I am just as good as the next one.
Don’t try and learn about new things if you don’t know at least %50 of your 1st spoken language, you’ll never be able to do it.
No matter how far we see , we can see fully developed galaxies meaning we still don't know the age of this universe. I think only God knows that.
No don't worry james webb telescope is going to acquire new data and go even earlier in time to the begenings of begenings
Understand that a short amount of time has passed on this discovery and scientists need more time and data and a deeper look to have any conclusive theories right now there are a million possible explenations but it is only after understanding the observation better that we will have a better understanding on what's going on
Hey geGrasse. This is the one you wanna talk to🤍🖤🤍
how? ahahahahaha
And still we say God doesn't exist!?
What god there are multiple
The dude is literally just vomiting Nicole and diem words out and praying folks are so afraid of the mobb that he won't be questioned.
Neil's just a knob who loves his own voice. Always interrupts and definitely sniffs his own farts
Wrong person i think you meant a religious leader or priest go to church and adress does criticisms
That's like saying, "I discovered, at sea level, boiling water hurts a humans skin..."
No, you didn't "discover" anything. You labeled something that existed before you
This guy said Pluto was not a planet.
Bwwwahaha. Not exactly. He was a public figure ,Scientist.. Who announced n took interviews that Global Scientific Organizations based on certain criteria that Pluto no longer was Technically a "Planet". Our youngest daughter that year,, grade school was sooo upset,lol . My Mrs bought his book on Children's letters to him. It was funny n sweet.
i may be wrong but pluto doesn't meet the criteria to be called a planet ;-;
@@cakewalk4602 Long ago it was determined that. By a world wide group of Astronomy Scientists. But if I recall? Recently they reversed their position a bit. So,,PLUTO got its status as a planet back,,sort of.😉
The great deception
Stop with this person already.
Stop crying. Your jealousy is showing
Real simple, little buddy. Don't click on it.
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 absolutely. But I did click, and I did comment, truly that simple. Thank you for the engagement. Love the life you live, live the life you love.
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 I mean, it was just as simple for you to pass by my needles comment. Yet you chose to stop, dip your toes in the water, and comment on how needless my comment was that you needlessly commented on about how needless it was and how I should have passed on by.
So what's more needless? One that comments needlessly, or one that comments on a comment they deem needless?
I would say, my comment isn't needless because it enticed a comment out of you. If my comment was needless, you would have passed on by, not acknowledged it. Yet, you acknowledged it, and commented on it, so it obviously wasn't needless.
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 it's OK little buddy, we understand it's hard for you to not click on things. We are here for you.
The dude had to much of his own koolaid.
We aren't seeing anything faster than the speed of light so we are observing past events from tens of thousands of years ago. That's what happens when you don't focus on maths and science, folks can pull the wool over your eyes, easy peasy.
Hold you thumb up to the sky. Your thumb covers. Over 1k galaxies as big or bigger then our milkey way.
Remember people, science is just best guess.
That's an hypothesis! Science is a work in progress.
Better than a religion: Make believe combined with violence.
Tyson is a shill
Wow. I usually love listening to this guy. But he said nothing here.
How did they place a telescope in orbit around the Sun but still in the Earth's orbit & immense gravitational pull ?
It's called science + physics /calculus!
The JWST is orbiting around the Lagrange point between Earth and the Moon.
@@Medabee8 No - it is at the second Lagrangian point which is NOT between the Earth and the Moon.
astronomy isn't a science, and Tyson isn't a scientist. Science should involve experiment and a much tighter scientific method whereas astronomy is more observation and speculation.
Not really theoritical physics comes up with theories based on current data then experimental physics prove them just like they proved the higgs field the quantic behavior of electrons etc etc
And astophysics observe cosmic phenomenon and make hypothesis based on current data such as analysing chemical components and phenomenons of stars planets and galaxies before we observed black holes it was just a hypothesis and how do you think we know stars fuse hydrogene and gravity bends space time does things have all been scientifically proven through complex methods and tools
You have a very minimalistic understanding of the scientific method it has many forms to sooth many enviorments as the tools used on earth are not the same used on the universe
And tyson is a scientist he has literally a phd in physics
They didn't "discoverer" horse hockey. That's not how that works. Goodness. Be better.