Duke of Marlborough - Toast to the Queen - TPUK Annual Dinner

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @whoswho9319
    @whoswho9319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    He’s related to the king, winston Churchill and the Vanderbilt family 😮

  • @audreyann1975
    @audreyann1975 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I saw a video where Muslims on the streets in London were being asked a question "What is British Culture?" They all said, ALL OF THEM, very similar answers! "British culture is all cultures!" Another said "There is no British culture. Its not 200 yrs ago!" As if having a British culture is bad or it's a bad word or something! Another said "All you need to be British is a British passport!" The most arrogant responses ever! But they were proven wrong! The young girl, Lauren Southern informed them that if she gets a Pakistan passport then "Im of Pakistani culture now! All I need is a Pakistani passport to tell me so." Suddenly these Muslims understood clearly her point!

  • @kittenmommy6345
    @kittenmommy6345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Was he drunk? 😧

    • @helenwalker2986
      @helenwalker2986 ปีที่แล้ว

      He had an accident... its aquired injury, nervous system and other....

  • @taniaearle4457
    @taniaearle4457 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hes sloshed haha

  • @perperson199
    @perperson199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Good man Churchill

  • @TheFreeVoiceUK
    @TheFreeVoiceUK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    He looks like Churchill 😂

    • @zdtfdfhgjk
      @zdtfdfhgjk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That... is his last name...

  • @jacob1029
    @jacob1029 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Offtopic but what happened to the UK uni change my mind video?
    I can't find it anywhere!

  • @Valelacerte
    @Valelacerte 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When her majesty Elizabeth II passes-hopefully, many years from now-will Prince Charles or William have the strength, courage, decorum and grace of our great Queen?

    • @SumitBohra487
      @SumitBohra487 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They already flunked that test I guess by marrying "commoners"? It takes a lot of discipline to be in high places- not everybody's cup of tea. At the same time wonder what Madame Elizabeth was doing when winston churchill killed 3 million Bengal people...

    • @MrAdrianOldfield
      @MrAdrianOldfield 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SumitBohra487 3M? Hardly...

    • @1chish
      @1chish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SumitBohra487 Firstly Churchill didn't 'kill 3 Mn Bengal people'. but nice try at a re-write of history. That famine was a natural disaster.

  • @captahab6370
    @captahab6370 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m American, so explain to me exactly what a Royalist means in these terms and who is this guy???
    Edit: no disrespect 😂❤️

    • @captahab6370
      @captahab6370 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Grace Charles James Spencer Churchill, well... thats a name for ya 😂. Think I followed u, thx!

    • @SumitBohra487
      @SumitBohra487 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@abritishlad888 The same winston churchill who famously caused the famine of Bengal during wwII that killed about 3 million civilians? He sure does have much blood on his hands dude.

    • @TheRightHonRai
      @TheRightHonRai 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      lala phad stop whinging. Your own government since independence have treated you like slaves too. They have made Hindus second class citizens in their own home. Thank god for prime minister Modi otherwise you would still be enslaved.
      Your great Subash Chandra Bose sided with the Japanese that carried out sea blockages also leading to food shortages in Bengal during the famine. It was Churchill who eventually got the Americans to ship food to India in despite a world war taking place with Britain’s very survival at jeopardy. Indians were given some form of self rule during 1935-1937 prior to complete self rule in 1947. There were local screw ups done by Indians which also led to this disastrous famine. Some of the food was also supplied to Indian soldiers stopping the Japanese from entering India from Burma. However your Subash Chandra Bose would rather India be a puppet state to the Japanese then take Britain at its promise for full independence.
      The Amritsar massacre happened in 1919 when a British general ordered Indian soldiers to shoot at unarmed crowd of men women and children. Half of Britain was shocked and general dyer was dismissed. British MPs would shame the British Indian government. Even churchill called it murder and said this should never have happened. He stated we was there to protect Indians not terrorise them. King George was disgusted and MPs would raise the issue in both the House of Commons and House of Lords.
      Now look at many of the Indian governments actions since independence. The golden temple attack to flush out Sikh separatist by the Indian army. The massacre that followed after murdering over 3000 Sikhs and burning their homes. The Indian government we’re responsible for that and turned a blind eye to mobs. Rajiv ghandi comments tried to even justify this. That was in 1984 under your own rule in a time of civilised nations. Yet you complain about unintentional disasters that have taken place during war time.

    • @perperson199
      @perperson199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@SumitBohra487 The bengal famine was caused by a natural disaster. Grow up

    • @perperson199
      @perperson199 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Graham, King of the Britons! What lies you've been swallowing