Not a Blackhawks fan, but "Chelsea Dagger" always seems to be the standard for goal songs and I agree. I personally also like "Crowd Chant"", bettter than the Rangers goal song, but credit to Castoldi for coming up with a song that would be unique to the Rangers and not just borrowing a song like I think all the other teams do.
Ranger fan for 60 years listening to games on a transistor radio when I was about 10 in NYC. Watched the game from the Seattle area. What a game, the best since they won in 1994.
@kobyschechter8163 it's been miserable because Lou isn't a modern GM he may of been successful with the Devils but the game has changed a lot - u can't build a team around aging players, many of them are also signed to long contracts, & apart from Barzal there's no real star quality up front. To Lou the system is king but in tight games u need game changers and that's why they lose so many in OT.
@rickhammond2473 I'm a rangers fan but you made me lmao with that comment. And I don't blame you for making it, the rangers always disappoint in the playoffs and cup.
It's amazing. I played hockey for many years when I was young and one of the Cardinal rules was to never pass the puck across the front of your net. It's something they pounded into your head. I find it hysterical how many times this is done in the NHL and people end up getting burned for it. Here's another perfect example. He could have taken the puck himself, towards the boards, but instead made a high risk pass across the middle that got intercepted. I mean I'll take it cuz I'm a Rangers fan but what a dumb move that pass was.😂😂😂
In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have been displaced by the actions of a defending player, the attacking player must have an imminent scoring opportunity prior to the goal post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.
I've seen this type of pass right in front of net happening many times. Puck got intercepted often enough..... not sure why many players are still doing it regardless.
WE GO FOR IT ALLLLLLL MAKE A TRADE ENERGIZE THESE MEN, THERE IS SOMETHING THERE MAN, SOMETHING THAT CAN PROPEL THIS FRANCHISE TO VALHALLA!!!!!! FIND IT! AND YOU WILL LIVE FOREVER!!!
People really think Dobson is a star because he gets so many assists. He’s a turnover machine and terrible defensively. If he’s on team Canada next year, they will finish 4th.
Was that not plausibly incidental contact with Ilya sprawled out in the crease & therefore not conclusively intentional? Remember when the NHL called in to disallow Vanek's OT goal on Halak & even Halak thought it was a good goal?
They gotta keep the Americans market interested. Why do you think since the 90s a Canadian team hasn't won? They already know the Canadians are gonna watch, the Americans? Lol. Gotta flatten the curve somehow to keep them competitive.
@@JaknDax I don't see how confusing the American market helps with any of that, in any case favoring the Isles lower in the standings would make more sense with your theory
I'm not familiar with the other example you gave. But I think this ruling was at least consistent with the spirit of the rule. Player was shooting, defending team dislodges the net, while he's shooting, puck clearly would have went into the net there.
@@xSnarfsx But this is incidental contact with the goalie, which disallowed many goals based on the NHL rulebook, a sprawled out goalie in the crease touched a skater also in the crease, that's incidental contact & Dobson shouldn't be faulted for that, it wasn't his direct actions that dislodged the net
@@PeterHKwok incidental contact refers to contact between opposing players. Rule 69 states “the attacking players position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not buy itself determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed.”
Nonsense. They deserved every penalty they got, and they got wrecked for it. Stupid penalties lead to losses. They deserved to get embarrassed on national TV. And I am an Islander fan.
The NHL has the worst rules. If a Rangers player knocked the net off and then scored its no goal. But this was a goal? When the net is off it should be no goal regardless. Dumb rules.
@AwesomeZach I know. But I'm saying if a rangers player knocked the net off and the rangers shot the puck in its no goal. I'm saying the NHL should be black and white about the rule. If the net is off its no goal. Period.
@@OvieSnips8 so in other words defenders should just be allowed to shove the net off the pegs if the puck is about to cross the line... yup, can't see that being abused in any way!
@@epodegro если посмотреть внимательно, то сначала идёт бросок, в процессе скольжения ворота сдвигаются, но в них никого нет и поэтому видимо судья решил, что гол был бы забит в любом случае, поэтому засчитали.
80,000 ppl there. Abt 79,000 were rangers fans. Best game I’ve ever been to
Most exciting game played at a football stadium was a hockey game!
I was there too (Rangers fan here), and that's not true. It was probably 75/25 or 70/30.
@@InMotionForAMillionFair Estimate
That’s about 800 too many 😂
The roar of the crowd when the ref said its a good goal was epic... Rangers Goal Song is the best in The NHL
More impressive was the complete and utter silence as soon as he started talking about the review
I think the Leafs one was better but like idiots they switched it
Not a Blackhawks fan, but "Chelsea Dagger" always seems to be the standard for goal songs and I agree.
I personally also like "Crowd Chant"", bettter than the Rangers goal song, but credit to Castoldi for coming up with a song that would be unique to the Rangers and not just borrowing a song like I think all the other teams do.
@@clipcoug1139Chelsea dagger is such a bop. Boston has a good one too. But NY’s energy is just infectious. Such passion.
Ranger fan for 60 years listening to games on a transistor radio when I was about 10 in NYC. Watched the game from the Seattle area. What a game, the best since they won in 1994.
Panarin is the best!
WHAT A COMEBACK!!!!!
Chris Drury loves it
Shout out to the refs
shoutout to the islanders playing not by the rules@@jIguess
@@jIguessyou blew a 4-1 lead get a couple bad penalties and blame the refs 😂
@@midnight472 both you guys know you had 2 bs penalty calls & you call it a win?
Panarin had a son a couple of days ago, he was named Alexey
Как Навального.
@@НатальяКитаева-ь8мне, Навального звали "Алексей Оторвался Тромб"
@@НатальяКитаева-ь8м иди нах еблан, его назвали Алексеем как Алексея Касатонова, Алексея Гусарова, Алексея Ковалёва
@@НатальяКитаева-ь8м как патриарх
Может в честь Навального
Being a rangers fan at the game it was a hell of show. Honestly the most exciting ive been to in person.
The Best NYR Game I watched so far. Let’s Go Rangers.
What an amazing way to finish an amazing comeback. LET'S GO RANGERS
Easily the best game I've ever attended. The dead silence as the ref went to center to announce the review and the explosion of cheers right after.
80,000 rangers fans .....such a beautiful sound!
лучший момент в сезоне!!!
Isles now 22-32 overall 😭
This season has been miserable. They will definitely become the first team in NHL history with 20 OT losses or more.
@kobyschechter8163 it's been miserable because Lou isn't a modern GM he may of been successful with the Devils but the game has changed a lot - u can't build a team around aging players, many of them are also signed to long contracts, & apart from Barzal there's no real star quality up front. To Lou the system is king but in tight games u need game changers and that's why they lose so many in OT.
1980
1980
1980
@@kobyschechter8163😂
To my knowledge, Rangers are still undefeated outdoors :D
5-0 in outdoor games. Tied with Boston for outdoor wins, but Boston has lost 1.
@@KhordLizardMageBruins are 4-1, Rangers are 5-0 & the first team to 5 outdoor wins.
LETS GO RANGERS!
NO QUIT IN NEW YORK!!!! My team almost gave me a heart attack but it was worth it.
Then what they are going nowhere
@@rickhammond2473 1st place in metro and tied for 3rd in the league. We're def going places.
@@nicole._sihler Your going places alright the first place will be the golf course.
@@rickhammond2473yeah ok buddy stay mad
@rickhammond2473 I'm a rangers fan but you made me lmao with that comment. And I don't blame you for making it, the rangers always disappoint in the playoffs and cup.
It's amazing. I played hockey for many years when I was young and one of the Cardinal rules was to never pass the puck across the front of your net. It's something they pounded into your head. I find it hysterical how many times this is done in the NHL and people end up getting burned for it. Here's another perfect example. He could have taken the puck himself, towards the boards, but instead made a high risk pass across the middle that got intercepted. I mean I'll take it cuz I'm a Rangers fan but what a dumb move that pass was.😂😂😂
too high intensivity and pressure. You do first, then think. Top level
Problem was that his teammates didn't expect the pressure and were were out of position. He really had nowhere to go.
Baseball and hockey are the 2 most low key thrilling sports out there. Agreed?
I love watching this! Panarin vs 3 NYI players and their golie! LGR!!!!!!
Тема🔥🔥🔥
Sloppy game, Igor still allows goals he should stop, so far this season not at his best. At least they have Quick as the backup.
Agree
I have NEVER been to a better game in any sport than this
Rangers 6 Islanders 5 What a comeback...
The Islanders already took an L with those jerseys and helmets
Wild game, good goal all day! Roy better send that D man or waive him for passing it up the middle like that. 😅
Who had Artemi Panarin with an aggressive forecheck on their 2024 Bingo card? 😅
In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have
been displaced by the actions of a defending player, the attacking
player must have an imminent scoring opportunity prior to the goal
post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would
have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.
Rule 63.7 for everybody
WHAT. A. GAME. LGR!!!!!!
The only place they are heading is to the golf course after they get knocked out of the playoffs.
@@rickhammond2473 stay mad LOL HAHAHAHAHAH
Incredible Comeback by the Rangers. Holy Snipe!
I've seen this type of pass right in front of net happening many times. Puck got intercepted often enough..... not sure why many players are still doing it regardless.
Because they are stupid. And careless.
High-danger pass in front of your own net makes no sense at all.
WE GO FOR IT ALLLLLLL MAKE A TRADE ENERGIZE THESE MEN, THERE IS SOMETHING THERE MAN, SOMETHING THAT CAN PROPEL THIS FRANCHISE TO VALHALLA!!!!!! FIND IT! AND YOU WILL LIVE FOREVER!!!
No quit 💪
1:58
Go Rangers !!!!
Just got home from the game. My throat is sore from cheering at the end.
Так а ворота же были сдвинуты ..
Засчитывается, если их сдвигает собственный игрок
It's always a pleasure to see Patrick Roy lose in such a miserable fashion. 🤣
Breadman only needed 10 seconds
LGR
Pandering is a pick wizard. The Hawks were foolish to trade him.
They didn't trade him. He was a free agent.
Islanders are the worst team in the league. If it wasn't for those stupid OT loss points theyd have a shot at first overall.
People really think Dobson is a star because he gets so many assists. He’s a turnover machine and terrible defensively. If he’s on team Canada next year, they will finish 4th.
I’ve said that since he came up. Kid is a massive liability defensively due to turnovers.
Took that net out on purpose
Да уж.
here, have a powerplay
Левая шайба в сдвинутые ворота!Позор судьям,которые вытащили ментов!🤬🤬🤬
шайба засчитана по всем правилам. в чем проблема?
Левый комментарий
иди кхл смотри, там нормально с этим 😂
Either team is going nowhere so it does not matter.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Lazy pass from a supposed budding star. Tells the Isles story in a nutshell.
Was that not plausibly incidental contact with Ilya sprawled out in the crease & therefore not conclusively intentional? Remember when the NHL called in to disallow Vanek's OT goal on Halak & even Halak thought it was a good goal?
They gotta keep the Americans market interested. Why do you think since the 90s a Canadian team hasn't won? They already know the Canadians are gonna watch, the Americans? Lol. Gotta flatten the curve somehow to keep them competitive.
@@JaknDax I don't see how confusing the American market helps with any of that, in any case favoring the Isles lower in the standings would make more sense with your theory
I'm not familiar with the other example you gave. But I think this ruling was at least consistent with the spirit of the rule. Player was shooting, defending team dislodges the net, while he's shooting, puck clearly would have went into the net there.
@@xSnarfsx But this is incidental contact with the goalie, which disallowed many goals based on the NHL rulebook, a sprawled out goalie in the crease touched a skater also in the crease, that's incidental contact & Dobson shouldn't be faulted for that, it wasn't his direct actions that dislodged the net
@@PeterHKwok incidental contact refers to contact between opposing players. Rule 69 states “the attacking players position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not buy itself determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed.”
Too many penalties called on Islanders in the last couple of minutes, some questionable.
Nonsense. They deserved every penalty they got, and they got wrecked for it. Stupid penalties lead to losses. They deserved to get embarrassed on national TV. And I am an Islander fan.
Respect @@Mr-DieHard
lol
NYI are sloppy there's no defending that. Roy knows it, the fans know it. Everyone knows it
100% if this was any Canadian team it would’ve not counted
nah thats a goal 100% in any game for any team its just straightforward ruling
You mean by decision made IN TORONTO? I
Exactly @@cndnclassics5874
@@markiv2942 yup a decision made in Toronto sponsored by buttmen. Heck they could of made the decision in china and it wouldn’t matter
Rangers have not had a great track record when it comes to booth reviews going their way.
Thats the first time I've seen a goal be allowed as the net was knocked off. I didn't think that would count.
Has happened before. I was sure it would count.
@@markiv2942defensive player knocked off the net while offensive player was in the act of shooting. Good goal.
No goal
From a leafs fan it's a 💯 % goal
Rule 63.7
Shot was already off, defense knocked the net off, puck went in without any interference from the net being knocked off.
It’s a goal
It’s nice to see common sense prevail
If the Flyers score that goal you know it would’ve been called back.
The NHL has the worst rules. If a Rangers player knocked the net off and then scored its no goal. But this was a goal? When the net is off it should be no goal regardless. Dumb rules.
The islanders player took it off the morings while the rangers had a clear shot. It counts. Goals have been scored like that before
So whats stopping the defensive player from knocking the goal off each time? What a dumb comment
@AwesomeZach I know. But I'm saying if a rangers player knocked the net off and the rangers shot the puck in its no goal. I'm saying the NHL should be black and white about the rule. If the net is off its no goal. Period.
If this was the case, people would just be pushing the net over to disallow goals...
@@OvieSnips8
so in other words defenders should just be allowed to shove the net off the pegs if the puck is about to cross the line... yup, can't see that being abused in any way!
Я не понял, почему засчитали, ведь ворота были уже сдвинуты?!?)
As a rangers fan I didn't either but according to the rule a player in the act of shooting
в момент действия ворота были на месте
@@epodegro если посмотреть внимательно, то сначала идёт бросок, в процессе скольжения ворота сдвигаются, но в них никого нет и поэтому видимо судья решил, что гол был бы забит в любом случае, поэтому засчитали.
@@oldschoololdschool3559 есть или нет роли не играет. Атакующий вратаря не толкал, шайба пересекла линию
I felt bad for Patrick Roy.