Dr. Craig Keener, Matthew, Lecture 1, Reliability of the Gospels
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- Biblical eLearning (biblicalelearni...) presents (audio is also available on Spotify open.spotify.c...
Dr. Craig Keener on Matthew
This is the first of 19 lectures Dr. Craig Keener of Asbury Seminary, Wilmore, Kentucky has done on the book of Matthew.
Be sure to check out his commentary: Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary published by Eerdmans. This video was produced by Ted Hildebrandt. The audio, full text in English, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, and others are freely available at biblicalelearn....
Dr. Keener's teaching in audio format is now available on Spotify Podcasting playlist [Biblical eLearning - Ted Hildebrandt]: open.spotify.c...
Craig Keener is EPIC!
Yes he is. Praise the Lord for Craig!
I love Dr. Craig Keener, He is one of the greatest Bible Scholars of our age ~ Sincere, Academic, Reasonable, Faithful
Yes he is!
How blessed we are to have such an amazing Biblical Scholar in the version of Dr. Keener!
Dr. Craig Keener, Amazing Lecture series !!!
Interesting and insightful lecture on this important topic. Thank you very much, Dr. Keener.
I have the Bible he contributes to the NIV Cultural Background Bible. He is outstanding.
Very very good
How can one date Luke later than the Book of Acts?
you cant
👎🏿 For that terrible music in the beginning, have a warning if that's going to happen
I'm not sure about this, myself. It wouldn't convince an atheist. Of course the gospels are biographies of Jesus. The point is they are al eyewitness accounts, or information gained from Christ's inner circle of apostles. Matthew doesn't "use" Mark, neither does Luke. Everyone gives their own account of Jesus Christ's life from the perspective of either a main or a minor apositle. That was the source, and Dr. Keener seems to completely overlook this.
Seaspray 127: You raise an interesting point. One might consider the INSPIRATION of God the Holy Spirit in guiding the Gospel writers? Independently, the apostle Paul contends that indeed this is the case (cf. 2 Tim. 3:15 with 2 Pet. 3:15 in which the NT Scriptures are considered inspired as the OT Scriptures (graphe). Paul's "conversion" would have been 2 years + (AD 35) after Jesus' crucifixion (AD 33). Paul's Corinthian letter (1 Cor. 15: 1-5) refers to his receiving what is considered to be the earliest recorded "creed". This should be compared to the early Gospel accounts for corroboration of the same message. Interestingly, according to Paul's own testimony, Gal. 1) he goes to see Peter 14 years (AD 49+) AFTER his own conversion (AD 35+). The earliest extant fragments of Matthew's Gospel are dates to the second century (E. J. Epp, 'The Significance of the Papyri for Determining the Nature of the New Testament Text in the Second century: A Dynamic View of Textual transmission', in Studies i the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism, 1993): 293-5; cf. T. Wasserman, 'The Early Text of Matthew', in The Early Text of the New Testament, Kruger & Hill, 2011, p.103-107. As for the dating of Mark's Gospel, as Peter Head (Tyndale House, Cambridge University) remarks, "We don't know much for certain about the publication and earliest distribution of Mark's Gospel." However, I concur with Head, as he states, "...strongly that the Gospel of Mark was known and used as a source material by both Matthew and Luke" including the author of the fourth Gospel). (idem, 110.)
We know that Luke and Matthew probably used Mark because of the close similarities (sometimes the wording is identical). Also, Luke confesses in his prologue that he used other sources. Atheists wouldn't accept the idea that the Gospels were written by eye witnesses
Logan Jones, read Richard Bauckham Eyewitness Book
A BirdyNumNum look into Eyewitness to Jesus by Carsten Pieder Theide
yeah its like they all contradicts even if they saw the same thing which is madness and really makes the bible unreliably