But this is a nice newer recording. Keeps the composition ( which I have loved deeply for 50 years from the famous Vronsky & Babin recording) alive and healthy ! Well done, Musicians !
@@gregorypalmer5403 as expected from Nikolai Lugansky. I was on his concerts live, he is truly magnicifient pianist. And some people say, he is Richter of today. And he seems to love Rachmaninoff very much. Like that if he is going to play encore, likely it'll be Lilacs or something like that.
Lugansky Rudenko가 연주하는 Sergei Rachmaninoff suite No.1번도 진짜 최고중의 최고인데 조곡 2번도 역시 조곡 2번 음원중에서도 이 두 피아니스트가 최고네... Rachmaninoff Suite No.1 & 2는 Lugansky Rudenko가 독보적인 존재다. 이게 바로 음악다운 음악연주가 아닌가 싶다.
The second movement is marked bar = 84bpm. This is played at something like 112 - far too fast. Just because you can doesn't mean you should! Still, it isn't as fast as Argerich (120) so that's something.
@@AndrewKierszenbaum i think its the part in the middle section where there is a lot of repeated notes and a bit waltzy if you say. I think they called it the Spanish waltz part or something like that
My instructor & I hardly ever got use 2 pianos, but she’d record both parts so I could still play at her house for my regular lessons. I only got so far into the 2nd piece in this video, but they play it a good bit faster for some reason. Seems kinda strange watching the music.
갠적으로 엠마누엘 엑스랑 예핌이 한게 더 와닿고 속도도 좋았음. 실속도가 빠르더라도 그 곡을 잘 소화시킨 연주들 들어보면 조급하게 안느껴짐. 이 사람들 버전 2번은 넘 빠르고 조급해서 뭘 전달하고싶은건지 모르겠음. 저 아름다운 화음을 조잡스럽게 루바토 넘 많아서 울렁거림...하...할말하않
Here we have too much of the aspect of Rachmaninov I dislike - too much difficulty for difficulty's sake and too little substance. I do not see the point of pianists as performing monkeys. Virtuosity for virtuosity's sake guickly gets boring.
This is not a "difficult" Rachmaninoff piece. Let's talk about the concerti or sonatas, or even some shorter pieces (études, preludes), those are difficult. This suite is exquisitely written for the pianists: it sounds more difficult than it is to play it and it fits perfectly into the hands (compare, for example, with Brahms, who usually sounds less difficult than it is to play). So, you can tell this was written by an accomplished pianist who cared about efficiency in the use of pianistic resources. The result, as with most Rachmaninoff, is music that is both an aural and 'physical' pleasure to play. I won't say it is a "profound" work -not all pieces need to be that way-, but it has so many beautiful and exciting moments.
General Relativity Friedmann Equation General Relativity Friedmann Equation Much of this information is incorrect--at least when it comes to this piece. The piece you’re referring to is the Suite No. 1 (originally called Etudes Tableaux.) There are no Movement titles or descriptions in this work besides the tempo markings. In addition the second movement of this piece starts around the 4 minute mark.
![[Kocsis-Ránki] Mozart: Sonata for Two Pianos in D, K448](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PQQgHpMBHbo/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Kocsis-Ránki] Mozart: Sonata for Two Pianos in D, K448](/img/tr.png)
i-0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00
ii-4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
iii-9:40 9:40 9:40 9:40
iv-17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00
So crazy how they were so in-tuned with each other in the Valse! How is that possible? Only geniuses can!
Practice, it's called practice, you spend 15 years to learn just how to play the piano properly and some funny things happen over that little time :-)
17:00
4:49 Suite 1 mvt 3
I swear the part from 6:35 to 7:04 is the most beautiful harmonic progression ever
I 0:00
II 4:12
III 9:39
IV 17:00
Damn, this one is SO difficult. But it's Rachmaninoff, what else do you expect it to be.
Not only hard for the individual pianist, but to sync
Impressive perfect piano ensemble ( live performance !), miracle virtuoso interpretation and with sound - agogic ideas ! !
17:10 лучшая часть
Tarantelle ❤️
14:09 its stunning
Wonderfully Amazing
21:19 I heard Rach piano concerto no.2
4:50 sounds like Rach 1 sonata in 28:41, the 3rd movement
it sure does, and a lot of the triplet passages are similar to piano sonata 1 and the 2nd mvt of 3rd piano concerto.
9:39
19:53 론도 C bridge
with dominant
I feel like some beauty is lost in the speed
Thanks for uploading!
Masterpiece relatively unknown; Martha Argerish and Nelson Freire (old and recent versions) are great
yees!!
But this is a nice newer recording. Keeps the composition ( which I have loved deeply for 50 years from the famous Vronsky & Babin recording) alive and healthy ! Well done, Musicians !
@@gregorypalmer5403 as expected from Nikolai Lugansky. I was on his concerts live, he is truly magnicifient pianist. And some people say, he is Richter of today. And he seems to love Rachmaninoff very much. Like that if he is going to play encore, likely it'll be Lilacs or something like that.
@@hjs60789 差ゆゆゆや手話シワシワ澤菜屋さやさやや
Far from unknown!
19:55 is pretty great imo
Lugansky Rudenko가 연주하는 Sergei Rachmaninoff suite No.1번도 진짜 최고중의 최고인데 조곡 2번도 역시 조곡 2번 음원중에서도 이 두 피아니스트가 최고네... Rachmaninoff Suite No.1 & 2는 Lugansky Rudenko가 독보적인 존재다. 이게 바로 음악다운 음악연주가 아닌가 싶다.
저는 라흐마니노프 다른작품들은 lugansky밖에 안들을정도입니다ㅋㅋ
@@pulancrodberic2126 루간스키 진짜 훌륭한 연주자입니다~
동의합니다
Wonderdul!! Even more rubato would be my absolute preference
The introduction is perfect
The beautiful lilt is lost in speed. Take time to make it beautiful whether march like or dance like. Beautiful ensemble work.
The second movement is marked bar = 84bpm. This is played at something like 112 - far too fast. Just because you can doesn't mean you should! Still, it isn't as fast as Argerich (120) so that's something.
Actually prefer Argerich’s version myself! The fast tempo is mesmerizing, especially during that E-Flat section
13:41 is insane
16:03
Bravo 👏
Me gusta a dos pianos
0:09
Lindo final .,incompara ble
❤
좋아요 😀
12:20 Rach 3 2nd mvt
I don’t hear it 😕
@@AndrewKierszenbaum i think its the part in the middle section where there is a lot of repeated notes and a bit waltzy if you say. I think they called it the Spanish waltz part or something like that
@@alexanfadel It's amusing because I do hear the resemblance, but 21:00 in this very set, and 21:26 especially sound so much more similar.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
00:09
4:53
the valse reminds me of Gillock’s waltz
Exelente mexico
My instructor & I hardly ever got use 2 pianos, but she’d record both parts so I could still play at her house for my regular lessons. I only got so far into the 2nd piece in this video, but they play it a good bit faster for some reason. Seems kinda strange watching the music.
17:07 Captain Jack Sparrow?
the first one seems crazy difficult and so tiring
Forcing Schubert to listen to this: Franz, you're good, BUT YOU COULD BE BETTER
I prefer the 3rd❤
I prefer Goldenweiser and Glinzberg.
Good and Vronsky & Babin too. This too also Argerich and ? Sorry, Senior Moment.
Check out Cateen and friend on this one its 😍 cute.
Գրեյթ, gret, греит
Best piece Rachmaninoff ever wrote?
No
No
No
I think that would be his Symphonic Dances
갠적으로 엠마누엘 엑스랑 예핌이 한게 더 와닿고 속도도 좋았음. 실속도가 빠르더라도 그 곡을 잘 소화시킨 연주들 들어보면 조급하게 안느껴짐. 이 사람들 버전 2번은 넘 빠르고 조급해서 뭘 전달하고싶은건지 모르겠음. 저 아름다운 화음을 조잡스럽게 루바토 넘 많아서 울렁거림...하...할말하않
Ich könnts auch nicht besser.😁
Es gibt immer noch Luft nach oben. Man kann es immer noch besser machen !
Let's hear your "improved" version...
License, Copyright.
Sounds very rushed .
Here we have too much of the aspect of Rachmaninov I dislike - too much difficulty for difficulty's sake and too little substance. I do not see the point of pianists as performing monkeys. Virtuosity for virtuosity's sake guickly gets boring.
Rachmaninoff often wrote not only to challenge others but also himself.
This is not a "difficult" Rachmaninoff piece. Let's talk about the concerti or sonatas, or even some shorter pieces (études, preludes), those are difficult. This suite is exquisitely written for the pianists: it sounds more difficult than it is to play it and it fits perfectly into the hands (compare, for example, with Brahms, who usually sounds less difficult than it is to play). So, you can tell this was written by an accomplished pianist who cared about efficiency in the use of pianistic resources. The result, as with most Rachmaninoff, is music that is both an aural and 'physical' pleasure to play. I won't say it is a "profound" work -not all pieces need to be that way-, but it has so many beautiful and exciting moments.
I often feel the same way when I listen to his music. The only piece of his I really like is the b-minor prelude.
General Relativity Friedmann Equation General Relativity Friedmann Equation Much of this information is incorrect--at least when it comes to this piece. The piece you’re referring to is the Suite No. 1 (originally called Etudes Tableaux.) There are no Movement titles or descriptions in this work besides the tempo markings. In addition the second movement of this piece starts around the 4 minute mark.
There are about 100 *ZILLION* devoted Rach fans who disagree (including me)...
16:59
4:12
4:10
17:00
17:00
16:59
17:00
17:00
17:00
17:00