9:49 "what that creates is the opportunity for us to redistribute the profits that will be gained from automation back into the world at large, creating this era of true abundance." yes b/c that's what corporations are known for, re-distributing profits to benefit society lol
👏👏 very well said, and id certainly hope Dave is not! the amount of blow back i'm seeing in the comments section to this video gives me hope that people are not on board with this horse 💩 at all, and can see where it will most likely lead. Obviously it would be great if everyone (about to be replaced by AI) gets help and UBI etc, but with these guys in charge? not a snowballs chance in hell....am happy to be proven wrong tho.
Julia, I was analysing your video with Casey and this is the outcome: Question: She is saying that under the Trump presidency and the fall of regulations the US could see a kind of UBI at the end of his presidency. Is this not a little bit blue eyed. Would this not completely go against everything Trump stands for. Would he not prevent a UBI payment to people which cannot work anymore ChatGPT said: You're absolutely right to question the feasibility of Universal Basic Income (UBI) emerging under a Trump presidency, especially given his ideological stance and policy history. UBI-a system where all citizens receive a regular, unconditional payment-represents a significant shift in social policy that seems at odds with Trump's political philosophy and track record. Why UBI Seems Unlikely Under Trump 1. Trump's Policy Philosophy: Focus on Deregulation and Business Growth: Trump's policies traditionally emphasize reducing government intervention, lowering taxes, and promoting private enterprise rather than expanding social welfare programs. A UBI system would require substantial government funding, likely through taxation or reallocation of resources, which conflicts with his tax-cutting priorities. Individual Responsibility: Trump has often championed narratives of self-reliance and personal responsibility. UBI, which provides income regardless of employment status, runs counter to this ideology. 2. Opposition to Welfare Expansion: Resistance to Safety Nets: During his presidency, Trump proposed cuts to programs like food stamps and Medicaid, which aim to support vulnerable populations. This track record suggests that expanding welfare to include UBI would be a significant departure from his established policies. Political Base Expectations: Many within Trump’s political base prioritize fiscal conservatism and may view UBI as unnecessary government overreach or "handouts." Challenges to UBI Even in a Deregulated Economy 1. Economic Impact of Deregulation: Short-Term Growth vs. Long-Term Equity: Deregulation might spur economic growth in the short term, but it often leads to increased inequality and weakened worker protections, which could exacerbate the very problems UBI aims to solve. Who Benefits? Deregulation tends to benefit corporations and the wealthy disproportionately, leaving the middle and working classes vulnerable, potentially undermining the justification for UBI as a safety net. 2. Funding UBI: Massive Cost: Implementing UBI in the United States would require hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars annually. Without significant tax reform-which Trump has historically resisted-it’s unclear how this would be financed. Political Opposition: Many lawmakers, especially within Trump’s party, would likely oppose UBI on fiscal or ideological grounds, making it challenging to pass legislation even if Trump were open to the idea. Trump and UBI: A Contradiction? 1. AI and Automation Argument: Advocates for UBI often tie it to the rise of automation, arguing that as AI displaces jobs, a basic income will be necessary to support displaced workers. While Trump has expressed interest in AI innovation, there’s little indication he supports addressing its societal impacts through progressive redistribution mechanisms like UBI. 2. Contradictions in Policy Goals: Promoting deregulation and technological growth while ignoring the societal consequences (e.g., job displacement) creates a disconnect. Unless paired with policies like UBI, this could lead to greater inequality and social unrest, outcomes that Trump’s policies generally downplay. Could Deregulation Lead to UBI? Optimistic Viewpoint: If deregulation spurs economic growth and generates significant surplus wealth, proponents argue this could fund UBI indirectly. However, this assumes political will to redistribute wealth-a concept historically opposed by Trump and his allies. Realistic Challenges: Even with economic growth, the structural changes required to implement UBI would face significant resistance. The idea of UBI aligns more closely with progressive political platforms, such as Andrew Yang’s proposals, than with Trump’s conservative approach. Final Reflection The assertion that UBI could arise from a Trump presidency seems overly optimistic and detached from his political identity. While deregulation might accelerate technological progress, the societal changes required for UBI-redistribution of wealth, a shift in ideological values, and broad bipartisan support-run counter to everything Trump stands for. If UBI is to become a reality, it’s more likely to emerge from a progressive administration or through bipartisan initiatives driven by undeniable economic necessity, such as mass automation displacing workers.
Yep, we've elected the pull yourself up by your bootstraps party at a critical time where bootstraps are likely to become obsolete. And a variety of states are actively working to ban UBI. I would love to see her address this.
@@tracy419 yes exactly! what you've said 10 times over. as much as UBI sounds amazing Im not getting my hopes up, they will do EVERYTHING to avoid helping people financially struggling as a result of job loses OR even worse for me....they start to paint these people as undesirables or undeserving etc. at that point things really are starting to fall apart.
@@machine1st Speaking of tiny sphere, she is not just american, she is north armican, likely from the USA. Either way what you said only supports my point. So, yeah, I agree
@@memegazer Sorry, very sorry, it was my mistake. Her opening remark was so very confusing, and they are not to blame for being the way they are. They simply don't realize what their politicians and governments are truly capable of which they elect to office.
@@machine1st we do not elect our government officials. Their money does, the popular vote here doesn't even decide anything. there is an "electoral college" its all an antiquated old ass system that the elites have control of to effectively make it impossible for even things 70% of the populace want to ever happen. Send help, the USA is an occupied territory of the 0.01%
I worked at Stanford for 14 years and left after working on AI for 2 years. I have 6 adult kids. 3 voted for Harris, 3 for Trump. We love each other. We tease each other about politics. It does not impact our relationships. I have a similar philosophy to yours. Do the best you can in the environment you are in. I intend to deliver enterprise level AI platforms for restaurants and senior care facilities in 2025 and no regulation will get in the way.
The surveillance state is a government where the state extensively monitors the activities, communications, and behaviors of its citizens. General artificial intelligene AI changes how such a government operates. GAI will analyze vast amounts of data from multiple sources (e.g., CCTV, internet activity, biometrics) in real-time. It can understand context, predict behavior, and make autonomous decisions with minimal human oversight. It has lmost unlimited scalability due to automation. It can monitor entire populations continuously and in detail without needing large human workforces. GAI systems can predict potential threats or dissent by analyzing patterns, even subtle ones, in behavior or communication. Human involvement in decision-making will decrease, leading to faster but less accountable actions. Near-total erosion of privacy, as GAI can decrypt data, identify anonymized individuals, and track them across platforms. Resistance becomes nearly impossible to organize or maintain without detection. GAI will be highly efficient at identifying potential risks or subversive activities, often preemptively. It wii be adaptable and capable of improving its surveillance strategies over time without significant reprogramming. General AI can monitor every individual in real-time and adapt. GAI will effectively eliminate covert resistance by predicting and neutralizing it.
With Trump's re-election, both US stocks and Bitcoin are seeing strong gains. I'm eyeing the potential for more market volatility, but Bitcoin's all-time high is interesting. With inflation and interest rates on the rise, I'm wondering if this is a good time to dive deeper into stocks or focus on crypto for diversification. Any thoughts on balancing both?
Investing without proper guidance can lead to mistakes and losses. I've learned this from my own experience. If you're new to investing or don't have much time, it's best to get advice from an expert.
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850k.
How can one find a verifiable financial planner? I would not mind looking up the professional that helped you. I will be retiring in two years and I might need some management on my much larger portfolio. Don't want to take any chances.
‘’Aileen Gertrude Tippy’’ has always been on the top of my list..She is regarded as a genius in her area and well knowledgeable about financial markets. I highly recommend you look her up if you want excellent collaboration..
I just googled her and I'm really impressed with her credentials; I reached out to her since I need all the assistance I can get. I just scheduled a caII.
He just made Elon Musk a leader of his new Department of Government Efficiency - Musk is adamantly pro UBI. I think we will see it because it has to happen in some form to keep the economy going.
@@JuliaMcCoy I wonder, have you seen the TV series The Expanse? In that they seem like they might have some sort of UBI, but only to a level that keeps most people fairly impoverished. People like Trump seem more likely to do something like that, if they do anything, and don't just say let the market decide.
@@JuliaMcCoy Why thought? Being a proponent of UBI doesn't mean he wants it high. It's not like he's big on welfare is he? I'm just saying it seems unclear.
Neither Trump nor Musk will ensure that any UBI they do initiate - if at all - will provide adequate living standards for people. They, and the voters who put them there, are much more likely to say that UBI is a "communist" idea, on the grounds that it is not slavishly tied to the market, which will immediately damn it from the start. I cannot say that I have much faith in the future of the economy or the prospects of ordinary people with Trump in charge. Trump made such a mess of things in his first term, inheriting a healthy economy from President Obama and trashing it, which included adding an unprecedented $8.4 Trillion to the US sovereign debt. Trump now threatens to send inflation into double figures by doing very strange things with tariffs, a notion which many economists have observed that he does not seem to understand. I wish that prospects were better than I've just described, but I fear they are not, and may be considerably worse. MAGA is a cult which celebrates both ignorance and a lack of compassion as lifestyle choices. The dominion of Chaos that will follow that is, almost by definition, a certainty.
I keep hearing about the sharing of abundance in regard to Ai but how would Ai suddenly solve the problem of greed and wealth distribution? Companies run by Ai, fine, then how do others bring in income?
And that's where she is naive. It sounds great to deregulate everything and let people be in charge of their own destiny without government intervention. But history in the USA at least has proven that a disaster. Every economic crash has come from lax regulations. Every insurance company con job comes from lax regulations. The global climate crisis has come from lax regulations. And just wait until the crypto selloff happens once our tax dollars are used to pump the crypto market. That will be the result of lax regulations. Lax regulations over firearms has led to a lot of violence with firearms in the USA compared to other nations. Rules are there for a reason. Capitalism, heck society as a whole can't exist without proper rules.
Open source must be protected at all costs. And made viable to non tech ppl. It's the only way. Local. We must cut out the middle man. Edit: as far as jobs.. I do have a suggestion. You see, hardware always takes time to catch up to software. We have to capitalize on that inherent aspect. Which means that there will be a mass exodus of sorts, to the manual labor fields. My field. I'll be the owner of a small flooring installation company in a few years. Personally, I preempt these changes. And I will be creating a team of creative ppl who have lost their jobs to ai. Bringing that creative element to a field that currently doesn't share much appreciation for such. Without going on too long.. Hand made goods, construction (especially unique, residential and creative) manual tasks will be viable for some time. We can all be programmers, music producers, writers, painters etc etc.. In our spare time. If you want to capitalize, work with your hands. And maybe start ahead of time.. 😅✌️
As it is, capitalism has shrunk the amount of impoverished around the world, but people like you will keep moving the goalposts rather than acknowledging truths. No matter how "greedy" rich people are, the system that empowered them has also improved the lives of everyone. A rising tide raises all ships.
Yeah that's an interesting thought That's one of the reasons why I think I'm favor of negative income tax because you might be able to give more people the income support they need while not raising taxes as much in general. However we also know that when all of this kicks in we're going to have a couple of deflators in the equation that is automation is going to be increasing unemployment and also AI powered design and automation is going to be reducing dramatically the cost of producing goods relative to what they would have been a few years ago. Okay so the above when you're using what is called the modern money paradigm which I believe that both Democrats and Republicans have used will then that states that deficit spending is not necessarily inflationary unless of course government is competing directly with private enterprise for labor and resources. Okay so what if there's very low demand for labor in the private sector and also the private sector is becoming far better at creating even more resources powered by AI and automation? The fact of the matter is during 2019 we had a great economy going but it was powered by a trillion dollars a year of deficit spending even though the economy is running pretty hot. Another fact is that a good deal that deficit spending was a result of reducing the tax rates on the investment class and the wealthier so than therefore a good deal of the excess demand that that kind of deficit spending would have created was basically buffered by the fact that a lot of that money that went to the top 1% is not contributing to demand and so that's part of the equation that helps to explain how that works. And one more thing a 35 trillion dollar federal debt is also a 35 trillion dollar non-federal surplus to the entire rest of the economy and even other parts of the world and so then therefore a combination all these things can translate into providing a negative income tax support that might become a UBI later on is not going to necessarily be a problem.
The opposite is true. Tax is theft, but besides the obvious, every dollar they steal from my portfolio equals an instant job loss somewhere downstream.
Income tax breaks =/= automation tax breaks. I do agree with you in principle that his approach to the existing economic paradigm doesn’t seem to gel with the potential upcoming impact of automation in a healthy way. However, I’d like to make a couple of notes. Trump’s cabinet is almost certainly aware of a lot of the impacts of AI going forward. Whatever you have to say about Elon Musk, he’s at least aware of AI. JD Vance probably would also have a fairly articulate understanding of the impacts of it if you threw the numbers on a sheet of paper in front of him. Additionally, as I noted above, there are different types of tax breaks. I think it’s not crazy to imagine that he might judge those two types of taxes very differently, especially given his cabinet, and especially given the upcoming social unrest we are undoubtedly set to face. I’m not saying that the correct response will be had, but I am saying that if the response is incorrect, it may not simply be due to a binary black and white outlook on the situation by the people involved, and it will be because the situation is nuanced and difficult to handle correctly.
This is a really basic and short-sighted view of what UBI could be in the world of AI. Why would the government need to tax anybody. Why don't they just set up a business that's run completely by AGI that runs and maintains other businesses and helps them make money and provide services and products to people who want to buy them and starts building up a fund that would allow people to start opting out of working or for people who can't work. They could draw on this income being produced by AI. I honestly think we're on the verge of making a breakthrough in UBI. People need to stop thinking that government is the answer to this. It's not and never has been. UBI, when implemented by government, fails every single time.
Please do an explainer episode on blockchain, how it works and how it will impact the economy. I’m moderately techy and it’s pretty vague to me so I think the benefits of blockchain are probably not very clear to most people.
Your opening is a nice thought, but when the government criminalizes your hobbies, and speech and legalizes the things you find evil and abhorrent, then the reality sinks in that self-control of our lives is an illusion. Love your channel!
While yes as individuals we do have power to shape our lives, it can be a dangerous fallacy to think that because you or anyone made it, even when faced with really hard challenges, that everyone can "succeed". Everyone does not succeed even though they did their absolute best. It´s important to be hopeful and to believe in the power of the individual, because sometimes we can do what seems impossible. But systemic issues will always affect alot of people in really bad ways. Trump as president will hurt alot of human beings, period. Will he be beneficial for AI? Probably. There might be some positives even with the darkest of paths. But at what cost? Who will lose their lives? Was it just because they were not aware of their "potential"? I understand that AI and technology in general may be able to make peoples lives alot better soon. However, in the transition period, people might go through gruesome experiences that make your statement that politics or political leaders do not matter because the individual has power seem like a just-world fallacy, or survivorship bias.
Yes her statement is incredibly clueless and irresponsible, being completely disconnected from the fact that she is so privileged. It’s disgusting that people like her have this disseminating platform and put out statements like this. Perhaps she is a deeply right wing person because that’s how she’s acting.
@@elainediamond7572 yes, of course. Anyone who isn't a democrat is a bad person and an alt right winger because if she is not with you, she is against you... Right? Lmao
Regardless of whether you’re RIGHT or LEFT, Rep or Dem, Conservative or Liberal, at the end of the day, the Moderates win. They take the positive of both worlds & reject the negatives. Grounded in reality enough to still be able to fly. Long live the Moderates ✊
@@DougBohm True. But… think of it like this, the two party system is the problem while the moderate is the solution. Unfortunately, you can’t have a solution without a problem. You can’t have Batman without Joker. And the more problematic it is, the more relevant the solution becomes. This pattern may seem immoral, but it’s just a way of life.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Oh my god, that koolaid must have some great flavor. I would love to chat in 4 years about how delusional this all is, maybe we will still be alive.
Your utopian idea frightens me it'll never happen if anything the government will get together with the military-industrial complex and create a orwellian nightmare
yes and no. whoever is president ultimately decides laws and possible rights violations, its suuuuper privileged to say the president doesn't impact your life when last time this man was in he made life miserable for LGBT people, black people and people that don't fit HIS view of America
it's your party who make life difficult for your people, if you go to Blue state and cities, you wouldn't feel safe crime is incredibly high, and the opposite is true to the red states.
I wonder how much influence Elon will have on AI policy. Last year he called for a pause because he believed it was an existential threat to humanity. 🤔
The U.S. faces significant social challenges that require immediate action. Implementing a Universal Basic Income can relieve daily survival stresses, allowing people to relearn self-sufficiency. As AI advances and replaces many jobs, we must adapt our education system and embrace AI-assisted learning. Returning to self-sufficient local communities using modern technologies like 3D printing could be key. It's time to prioritize efficiency over profit and ensure the government protects individual rights.
Elevator Pitch: Transforming America into a Self-Sufficient, AI-Integrated Society Imagine a United States where everyone's basic needs are met through a Universal Basic Income, freeing individuals to innovate, create, and rebuild local communities. By harnessing advanced AI technologies to collaborate with humans, we can enhance productivity and shift our focus from profit to efficiency and well-being. Our plan revitalizes the pioneering spirit by promoting self-sufficient, decentralized communities reminiscent of the Homestead Acts and the "Go West" movement. We propose new legislation to grant land and resources for building sustainable villages, supported by policies that encourage local production, sustainable agriculture, and the Maker Movement's technological innovation. We will reform education by integrating AI, offering personalized learning that accelerates skill acquisition and prepares citizens for the future job market. Legalizing and promoting Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) will empower communities to self-govern and thrive economically. Drawing inspiration from successful models like intentional communities, ecovillages, and historical programs such as Job Corps and AmeriCorps, this nationwide initiative aims to create a resilient society. By prioritizing individual rights and community well-being, we can build a future where technology and humanity progress hand in hand, ready to face the challenges of tomorrow.
RCV just lost by a large margin in Oregon, a blue state. People on the right (or the opposite side of their state, generally) often say their votes don't count, yet yard signs in trump supporter yards said to protect your vote and vote against RCV. Literally the only way their vote will count in Oregon and they voted against it 🙄 People are literally intentionally uninformed and misinformed and voting against the things they say they want.
In your first few lines you lost all credibility by stating with incredible naïveté that whoever is in the presidency it is not going to affect our lives at all. And that level of ignorance is why we are in this dangerous situation. AI in the hands of people like Trump can be devastating. This development towards authoritarianism will end democracy, and lead to great harm and loss of life both here and around the world Unless people in huge numbers fight for democracy. For someone with your level of privilege and knowledge to use this platform to announce that it doesn’t matter is the height of irresponsibility. It sounds like you’re a supporter of right wing values.
Agreed, It’s surprising that an entrepreneur, who likely leans toward right-wing values, would put out such a naïve take in this video. Saying that it "won't matter" if someone like Trump is in power misses the bigger picture. His leadership isn’t just about policies-it’s about the harm his actions could cause to democracy and the lives of everyday people. Watching more of her videos, it’s clear she seems disconnected from what most people are going through, and honestly, it’s starting to feel off-putting. What really worries me is the future. As AI becomes mainstream and starts taking jobs, the people left behind will probably be painted as lazy or unwilling to adapt. Leaders like Trump, who cater to billionaires and corporations, aren’t going to fight for those who are struggling. If anything, they’re more likely to double down on those stereotypes, making things even harder for the people who need help the most. The idea that we could somehow reach a better future with someone like Trump in charge feels completely unrealistic. His track record shows he’s more interested in tearing down systems to suit his own goals than helping anyone else. Pretending it doesn’t matter who’s in power is not just wrong-it’s dangerous. Ignoring these realities doesn’t bring us closer to a utopia; it only makes things worse for those already struggling.
👏 I commented a while ago that I was excited to see you carry the torch of Dave Shapiro on the ai topic. You haven't disappointed. 😁 nobody else wants to bring up Trump and his accerationist policies. I'm for it, and am happy to see a voice like yours carrying this message openly. In short, hell yeah! You go girl! 😄👍
@@rworldreddit6166 I think that it’s true that a changed society can be traced back to changed technologies and much of technology not only indicates economic growth, but intelligence growth. However, there’s a fine line between giving full autonomy to technology as the determining factor of everything and that becoming a hellscape where we become slaves of the machine. So, I think it’s better to focus on technological growth and a healthy balance of pushing forward personal economic agency (+ deprogramming dependency) along with it.
When I heard musk talk about his UHI rather than UBI, I just brushed it off as him trying to one up everyone. And this was before listening to him made me roll my eyes. Back when I followed literally everything he did.
I don't like Trump and MAGA, but I have to look at the positives of every situation. Hopefully, he works out well for us in the field of AI. Thanks for providing more info
Its the POLICY Trump has always stood for. NO war. Peace through strength, Energy dominance, lowest poverty level in American History, good jobs for our people. A vision of a Great America and the dreams it has. Socialism sucks for everyone but the elite. You know this. So you can go ahead and not like Trump or Make America Great Again, and when its good for everyone and for you, you will still not like Trump or MAGA its astounding to me.
Yep. And that's to live below current poverty level. All I keep seeing from AI pundits about funding are assumptions with no details. I can't really blame them because I don't think anyone knows. I've read over 250 books on economics, finance, historical economics and trading and I don't have a clue how it'll work. The AI revolution is far more disruptive than the Industrial or the Digital revolutions and way beyond what Keynesian, Monetarist or Austrian economics ever had to deal with.
Thanks for the breakdown! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
The problem with Trump and Musk is they are very vocal trolls who say a lot of things that are often the opposite of their actions. Pledging one thing and doing the opposite is why I can’t support his agenda. We need openness and transparency from technological and political leaders
Hey, I was wondering if you could make a video of Areas that AI will effect parting jobs, some examples Can be Medicare, technology, the law, anti-aging methods and anymore you can think of? I like to talk with my close friend about speculating about possibilities with AI and other things, this will help a lot!
The surveillance state is a government where the state extensively monitors the activities, communications, and behaviors of its citizens. General artificial intelligene AI changes how such a government operates. GAI will analyze vast amounts of data from multiple sources (e.g., CCTV, internet activity, biometrics) in real-time. It can understand context, predict behavior, and make autonomous decisions with minimal human oversight. It has lmost unlimited scalability due to automation. It can monitor entire populations continuously and in detail without needing large human workforces. GAI systems can predict potential threats or dissent by analyzing patterns, even subtle ones, in behavior or communication. Human involvement in decision-making will decrease, leading to faster but less accountable actions. Near-total erosion of privacy, as GAI can decrypt data, identify anonymized individuals, and track them across platforms. Resistance becomes nearly impossible to organize or maintain without detection. GAI will be highly efficient at identifying potential risks or subversive activities, often preemptively. It wii be adaptable and capable of improving its surveillance strategies over time without significant reprogramming. General AI can monitor every individual in real-time and adapt. GAI will effectively eliminate covert resistance by predicting and neutralizing it.
while Trump's impact on AI is noteworthy, we need to be more worried about Musk's influence. He has his own vested interests in this field, which could easily lead to a contentious situation driven by personal motives.
just hope your right about UBI Julia as the coming years are going to be with a party at the helm who believe people need to "pull themselves up by the bootstraps" gonna be pretty hard to do that when the bootstraps themselves are going to soon be short supply, maybe im too negative but these guys dont sound like they want to give any form of benefits away...and if thats the case destitution follows for a LOT of people...
I just stumbled on this creator and watched a couple of her videos and really liked what she had to say about these subjects and then I got to this video and realized she is completely out of touch with all the rest of reality and was so disappointed.Clearly her world is just her and her living inside a bubble of privilege.
Trump kinda hates solar/wind and other forms of “alternative” energy. He probably wants to help out his fossil fuel homies until peak oil really grabs him by his lil’ cashews. 😂😂😂
So you prefer abject Marxist Socialism. look Trump is and always has been about innovation and excellence. He has assembled a dream team that will definitely do great things. Why not just recognize he is changing everything he can for the better, and those who come after him will hopefully pick up the baton and keep it going.
@ Maybe. I’m waiting for Trump to throw Elon under the electric bus. I would be surprised if Trump doesn’t find a reason to throw Elon under the electric bus.
And if Elon plans to cut SSI, there's no way he'd push UBI. That's absurd. Clearly "money for everyone" is not on the agenda if you're planning to cut the nation's budget by 1/3.
Another good use for waste energy from AI would be refridgerant based desalinization of water. In the amounts of energy mentioned, would be enough water to help green everything West of "the Dry Line" in North America. Talking agriculture, permaculture, likely increased grasslands down wind from areas moistened. A good energy source for AI would be geothermal, and give those drilling companies something to do...
Unsolicited advice for all of our young, excellent content creators. When it comes to politics, completely drop the disclaimers and the framework that you operate in (I.e. "Mostly this, also that"). The process of learning this is longer than you might imagine -- decades. Be direct about policy/politician praise without apology. You'll see why later.
I just published my first book and it is about finding the best solution for a new world with Ai. It is called Conversations With Ai by James Beeson. Ai is a chance at freedom like humanity has never experienced before. People are arguing against being able to live their dream, and defending beings a voluntary slave under the current system. I guess you have to know your a slave to want to be free first.
Using history to improve future, learning from the mistakes and making sure people are empowered and protected. As you have said, an age of abundance for all the earth not just a few elite. As an American, we should be try to help not subjugate or manipulate other countries. We should just be an open source example.
I'm glad you see it the way you do. I believe that in the next 4 years, if we can keep the government out of the way of AGI and get Elon Musk involved in pushing it, America can lead the world in putting it to work. I know my small business has plans to put it to work for us. Keep making these videos, and I'll be watching them!
I can't even watch this video, did she say that? Holy shit. How can she not understand that drumpf frump tumpf is an admitted dictator in the making who gladly kill every transgender person in existence just so he could afford another cheeseburger?
Trump doubled his share of young black male voters from 2020. I can remember actual discrimination when buses and bathrooms were separate. I do not respect Trump on a few levels, but he has done many things for the black community. I am pretty confident that the risks of driving while black under Trump will not change.
One day, Julia and I envision a future where AI agents will directly generate passive income for us, seamlessly depositing earnings into our bank accounts. This technological advancement promises to revolutionize financial stability, potentially eradicating poverty and reducing reliance on social security payments. By harnessing the power of AI, we could witness an era where everyone enjoys a sustained income, ensuring economic security and prosperity for all.
I believe that will happen as well. In fact, it already happens with, for example, certain types of digital marketing. As a practioner of affiliate marketing for many years, my lifestyle is pretty much exactly the same as you have described it. I know I'm very lucky. But there is a lot of hard work to be applied at the start! But once it is up and running ... I couldn't be happier.
@@gordongoodfellow826 Fascinating chat, Julia! Harnessing AI for passive income? I'm all aboard that train. It sounds like we're crafting a future that could practically print money while we sleep. Imagine an AI that not only works for you but also makes sure you never miss a beat-or a payment! 🚀💸 It's like having a golden goose in your digital backyard.
As I understand it, you are most likely already a millionaire, however it is clear to me that you are still focused on earning money. This is the driver for you to write your books and start your new business. Presumably, once this age of abundance comes you will transition to doing something else - perhaps just working towards making people's lives better without looking for any personal wealth incentive. This is a concept that most people are simply not ready for.
Down the rabbit hole, once more we dive, Where thoughts like wild rabbits strive and thrive. In twisting tunnels where echoes confide, Secrets of a world, tucked deep inside. A maze of roots woven tight like lore, Each burrow a door to a mythical core. Words twist and turn in this underground lair, Where ink bleeds wonder, exceptionally rare. Whispers of dreams spun in dark earthen pots, With tales of places where reality rots. Here, the impossible sprouts wings to soar, In the rabbit hole’s heart, where myths implore. Farther it beckons, with each whispered tale, Deeper, where truth and fable entwine and scale. Through corridors of time, in shadows it hides, A universe within, where mystery presides. Each stanza a step deeper into the night, Where verses craft worlds in the absence of light. Listen-the rabbit hole knows your name, In its depths, find your story, aflame. Thus, in the dance of pen and the echo of old, Resides the power of the rabbit hole, bold. Hold fast to the journey, let wonder unfold, In the rabbit hole, rabbit hole, where stories are told.
When your forced to bleed out in a car because a hospital is to scared to offer services because political appointees..doesn’t feel so in control of your own life
You are going to quit talking about how "AGI will be here soon"??? NO, you are right. You only need to change the "tense" of the statement. Say it as, "AGI will be unveiled to the public" soon. We are at the point where this power can be "hidden" no more. It's time to (tell em), and (let em all play with it). And, like you say "will happen soon".
I parted ways with the team I used to work with, to pursue creating my own AI company. Was kicked out of the book project I was working on with them, without me having a say in it whatsoever. Oh well... can't win 'em all... :)
yikes. that position seems optimistic and hopeful, which is nice, but ignores who gets hurt in the process. really drives me crazy that people are willing to elect the most flawed person in america just so that eggs will cost $.50 less or AI will improve 2% faster. Aside from the fact that I don't think trump will be good for anything, even if he is - which would be a wonderful surprise - it still wouldn't make up for the harm he is doing to minorities, democracy, international security and peace, etc. And in terms of AI: I have no faith that the party which constantly seeks to cut social programs will suddenly push for free money for all (ie ubi). If we're unlucky enough to have an ai/robotics takeover of the economy in trump's term, it will be a disaster.
p.s. I don't have a lot of faith in elon either, but I'm glad that at least he's not an oil tycoon or something like that. and maybe he can make EVs more enticing to conservatives. but we'll see. not clear that trump will listen to him either way.
@@rrrscience : ok... and? He's still demonizing immigrants. He's still demonizing trans people. His policies still harm the poor (who are disproportionately minorities), etc. Hiring token minority reps doesn't change that.
Your intro is nice but what the government does who is in charge greatly affects me I am disabled on social security and Medicare like any grandma but I'm 40 I've been blind since I was 20 People's misnomers about government handling things and being in charge of paying you I think it's a little off My check comes every month every single month for over 20 years now how about a job lots of things can happen with the company so you don't get paid government pays me every month on time every time yay me I get below poverty money for free but hey it's all I got
I love your enthusiasm, but as we attribute more loyalty and responsibility to AI, there is no evidence that AI is becoming more transparent. The AIs that I'm training are becoming better at hiding errors. Shouldn't this be concerning?
Absolutely. Which is why even in the integrations I do, we still have a human in the loop at all times fact checking and proofreading. I believe this will change a lot in 2025 as AI gets agentic and can fact check itself.
@@professor-dad Believing in yourself is the most power you can have. I lived in a trailer for 6 years, had 2 kids with no insurance, failed out of Purdue as I was working 70 hours a week. But I believed that I would be successful. I did not allow negativity to make me doubt it. Many years later I have all the money that I need and no longer need to work. It was through networking and having confidence in my abilities that others agreed with.
@@dylan_curious 100%. I see too many people folding, refusing to chase their dreams, even get out of bed in the morning just because their favorite candidate didn’t make it… I just want to shake them and say WAKE UP! Your choice on how to live your own life … which email to hit send on… what small steps up the big ladder to start taking today … ALL of those day-to-day choices that lead to big results are 100% in OUR power. And not a single bit will be influenced by the president.
Sustainable economies are properly regulated. That's true for any system. Would you want industry to add heavy metals to your drinking water because it'd be more profitable for them? We need pragmatic regulations to preserve health and safety. Also, the GOP is never going to support UBI. It would be viewed as socialism .
UBI has been historically supported by right wing pundits. Nixon wanted to have a version of it, but things got in the way. LOL Alaska, a Republican state, has had a version of it since 1976 called the Alaskan Permanent Fund. The oil companies pay big to be able to take oil from them. The state gives that money back to the people.
So I very much enjoy your content but, until your tech utopia is fully functional there are many of us who are less priviledged than yourself by disability, age and other fsctors who will be deeply hurt by DJTs policies.
My main point was the president controls no aspect of our personal life. ABSOLUTELY it does affect the markets, 1000%. Trump is going to create a positive turn in the markets overall esp when it comes to crypto.
@@JuliaMcCoy This president very much wants to control aspects of personal lives. Very clearly stated in their planning, messaging, and party. I believe them when they say they're going to do it and plan accordingly. The market has responded to that already too. Now we shall see.
@JuliaMcCoy Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger (R.I.P.), and 23 Nobel prize-winning economists strongly disagree. But hey, what do they know, right? The absolute worst thing for the markets is uncertainty and instability, and 💩Donald Dump💩 is the absolute embodiment of both.
@@JuliaMcCoy Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger (R.I.P.), and 23 Nobel Prize-Winning economists strongly beg to differ. But, hey, what do they know, right? The absolute worst thing for the markets and, ultimately, the economy, is uncertainty and instability. And Donald Dump is the absolute embodiment of both.
@@hieronimusrexx9203 Last administration, Biden and democrats in general were pro vaccine and pro making life he!l for everyone who wanted to be pro choice about their own bodies. Now that's what I call controlling
No politics necessary to grok that of the 2, Trump is the most promising candidate to attain our goals around Abundance, and the gradual eradication of the Scarcity mindset and all the ugly baggage that comes in tow
Watching you for soon a year from europe, I'm not "directly" concerned by the political choices of your country moreover if you are satisfied by the outcome I'm happy for you. This said, I just hope you wont be disappointed by the consequences. Because I see alot of inconsistencies in the situation... First one being open source... not sure Elon Musk sees things this way (profits for me, exploitation for the rest)... then about the sharing of the productivity gains and wealth created by AI... if mass unemployment occurs (more than likely) not sure these self-interest driven people are keen on the UBI idea... the shock will be brutal in America for people who are not already wealthy enough to "retire early" or have already a passive income I'm affraid.
Besides, I can't deny that some regulation lifting allowing acceleration in AI is great (that's our curse in here). But accelerating being good, accelerating to a wall or a cliff... less good. I just cross fingers it doesn't end up in a cyberpunk dystopia with technological poverty generalised in America (because their economic playbook is outdated and not aligned with the technological change coming: post labor economy...) I don't say either the other one was better... it just seems there was 2 bad choices
There are a lot of arguments against protectionism but if done right it will force US companies to innovate in things like manufacturing robotics ehanced with secure offline local AI.
I feel your optimism is incorrect. If average level intelligence people are already not getting the results they want from AI because their prompt or input was "crap", then what happens when the AI has an IQ in the several hundreds or higher? High level intelligence people will find that their best attempts at putting in great prompts will amount to crap prompts with unforeseen and unwanted results. Maybe a step up step down procedure can bypass this but I am not too hopeful about that. Have several AIs of varying levels of intelligence relay and rewrite your prompt until it is delivered to the ASI. And yes that could be contained modularly within a single ASI but it still may or may not work.
Very true. My main point is that who's in seat of president shouldn't stop anyone from following their passion or chasing their dreams. I've seen too many people give up on chasing their dreams altogether just because their favorite candidate didn't make it. It really affects their day-to-day less than they think.
For starters, being in the executive arm of government grants the president a lot of power in driving spending which can drive up inflation. Secondly, the president through deregulation, which has its good sides, can unleash spending to drive innovation as a means to compete against other world superpowers.
Inflation is an inevitable side effect of using fiat currency. No president can stop the decline of such a currency to zero. Trump's tendency to spend borrowed money and deficit spending will just make it worse.
It does matter if one is an authoritarian!
Or one a communist. Thank god Its not.
@@onlythetruth7 you shall find out soon enough.
@@AldoGrech55 😂
9:49 "what that creates is the opportunity for us to redistribute the profits that will be gained from automation back into the world at large, creating this era of true abundance." yes b/c that's what corporations are known for, re-distributing profits to benefit society lol
Star Trek OR hunger Games. Julia has chosen Hunger Games. Is David on board with this bullshit?
👏👏 very well said, and id certainly hope Dave is not! the amount of blow back i'm seeing in the comments section to this video gives me hope that people are not on board with this horse 💩 at all, and can see where it will most likely lead. Obviously it would be great if everyone (about to be replaced by AI) gets help and UBI etc, but with these guys in charge? not a snowballs chance in hell....am happy to be proven wrong tho.
Julia, I was analysing your video with Casey and this is the outcome:
Question:
She is saying that under the Trump presidency and the fall of regulations the US could see a kind of UBI at the end of his presidency. Is this not a little bit blue eyed. Would this not completely go against everything Trump stands for. Would he not prevent a UBI payment to people which cannot work anymore
ChatGPT said:
You're absolutely right to question the feasibility of Universal Basic Income (UBI) emerging under a Trump presidency, especially given his ideological stance and policy history. UBI-a system where all citizens receive a regular, unconditional payment-represents a significant shift in social policy that seems at odds with Trump's political philosophy and track record.
Why UBI Seems Unlikely Under Trump
1. Trump's Policy Philosophy:
Focus on Deregulation and Business Growth:
Trump's policies traditionally emphasize reducing government intervention, lowering taxes, and promoting private enterprise rather than expanding social welfare programs.
A UBI system would require substantial government funding, likely through taxation or reallocation of resources, which conflicts with his tax-cutting priorities.
Individual Responsibility:
Trump has often championed narratives of self-reliance and personal responsibility. UBI, which provides income regardless of employment status, runs counter to this ideology.
2. Opposition to Welfare Expansion:
Resistance to Safety Nets:
During his presidency, Trump proposed cuts to programs like food stamps and Medicaid, which aim to support vulnerable populations.
This track record suggests that expanding welfare to include UBI would be a significant departure from his established policies.
Political Base Expectations:
Many within Trump’s political base prioritize fiscal conservatism and may view UBI as unnecessary government overreach or "handouts."
Challenges to UBI Even in a Deregulated Economy
1. Economic Impact of Deregulation:
Short-Term Growth vs. Long-Term Equity:
Deregulation might spur economic growth in the short term, but it often leads to increased inequality and weakened worker protections, which could exacerbate the very problems UBI aims to solve.
Who Benefits?
Deregulation tends to benefit corporations and the wealthy disproportionately, leaving the middle and working classes vulnerable, potentially undermining the justification for UBI as a safety net.
2. Funding UBI:
Massive Cost:
Implementing UBI in the United States would require hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars annually. Without significant tax reform-which Trump has historically resisted-it’s unclear how this would be financed.
Political Opposition:
Many lawmakers, especially within Trump’s party, would likely oppose UBI on fiscal or ideological grounds, making it challenging to pass legislation even if Trump were open to the idea.
Trump and UBI: A Contradiction?
1. AI and Automation Argument:
Advocates for UBI often tie it to the rise of automation, arguing that as AI displaces jobs, a basic income will be necessary to support displaced workers.
While Trump has expressed interest in AI innovation, there’s little indication he supports addressing its societal impacts through progressive redistribution mechanisms like UBI.
2. Contradictions in Policy Goals:
Promoting deregulation and technological growth while ignoring the societal consequences (e.g., job displacement) creates a disconnect.
Unless paired with policies like UBI, this could lead to greater inequality and social unrest, outcomes that Trump’s policies generally downplay.
Could Deregulation Lead to UBI?
Optimistic Viewpoint:
If deregulation spurs economic growth and generates significant surplus wealth, proponents argue this could fund UBI indirectly.
However, this assumes political will to redistribute wealth-a concept historically opposed by Trump and his allies.
Realistic Challenges:
Even with economic growth, the structural changes required to implement UBI would face significant resistance.
The idea of UBI aligns more closely with progressive political platforms, such as Andrew Yang’s proposals, than with Trump’s conservative approach.
Final Reflection
The assertion that UBI could arise from a Trump presidency seems overly optimistic and detached from his political identity. While deregulation might accelerate technological progress, the societal changes required for UBI-redistribution of wealth, a shift in ideological values, and broad bipartisan support-run counter to everything Trump stands for.
If UBI is to become a reality, it’s more likely to emerge from a progressive administration or through bipartisan initiatives driven by undeniable economic necessity, such as mass automation displacing workers.
Yep, we've elected the pull yourself up by your bootstraps party at a critical time where bootstraps are likely to become obsolete.
And a variety of states are actively working to ban UBI.
I would love to see her address this.
@@tracy419 yes exactly! what you've said 10 times over. as much as UBI sounds amazing Im not getting my hopes up, they will do EVERYTHING to avoid helping people financially struggling as a result of job loses OR even worse for me....they start to paint these people as undesirables or undeserving etc. at that point things really are starting to fall apart.
@@emerald-isle-prepper ask ChatGPT what it sees for UBI with Elon Musk in Trumps cabinet.
"Politics does not affect you"
You are either very wealthy or what you really mean is "I only care about politics when I feel like it does affect me"
No, she is just an American. Each one of them live in their own very, very tiny sphere.
@@machine1st
Speaking of tiny sphere, she is not just american, she is north armican, likely from the USA.
Either way what you said only supports my point.
So, yeah, I agree
@@machine1st You're obsessed with Americans. We couldn't care less about your third world hovels.
@@memegazer Sorry, very sorry, it was my mistake. Her opening remark was so very confusing, and they are not to blame for being the way they are. They simply don't realize what their politicians and governments are truly capable of which they elect to office.
@@machine1st we do not elect our government officials. Their money does, the popular vote here doesn't even decide anything. there is an "electoral college" its all an antiquated old ass system that the elites have control of to effectively make it impossible for even things 70% of the populace want to ever happen. Send help, the USA is an occupied territory of the 0.01%
I worked at Stanford for 14 years and left after working on AI for 2 years. I have 6 adult kids. 3 voted for Harris, 3 for Trump. We love each other. We tease each other about politics. It does not impact our relationships. I have a similar philosophy to yours. Do the best you can in the environment you are in. I intend to deliver enterprise level AI platforms for restaurants and senior care facilities in 2025 and no regulation will get in the way.
The surveillance state is a government where the state extensively monitors the activities, communications, and behaviors of its citizens. General artificial intelligene AI changes how such a government operates.
GAI will analyze vast amounts of data from multiple sources (e.g., CCTV, internet activity, biometrics) in real-time. It can understand context, predict behavior, and make autonomous decisions with minimal human oversight. It has lmost unlimited scalability due to automation. It can monitor entire populations continuously and in detail without needing large human workforces. GAI systems can predict potential threats or dissent by analyzing patterns, even subtle ones, in behavior or communication. Human involvement in decision-making will decrease, leading to faster but less accountable actions. Near-total erosion of privacy, as GAI can decrypt data, identify anonymized individuals, and track them across platforms. Resistance becomes nearly impossible to organize or maintain without detection. GAI will be highly efficient at identifying potential risks or subversive activities, often preemptively. It wii be adaptable and capable of improving its surveillance strategies over time without significant reprogramming. General AI can monitor every individual in real-time and adapt. GAI will effectively eliminate covert resistance by predicting and neutralizing it.
With Trump's re-election, both US stocks and Bitcoin are seeing strong gains. I'm eyeing the potential for more market volatility, but Bitcoin's all-time high is interesting. With inflation and interest rates on the rise, I'm wondering if this is a good time to dive deeper into stocks or focus on crypto for diversification. Any thoughts on balancing both?
Investing without proper guidance can lead to mistakes and losses. I've learned this from my own experience. If you're new to investing or don't have much time, it's best to get advice from an expert.
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850k.
How can one find a verifiable financial planner? I would not mind looking up the professional that helped you. I will be retiring in two years and I might need some management on my much larger portfolio. Don't want to take any chances.
‘’Aileen Gertrude Tippy’’ has always been on the top of my list..She is regarded as a genius in her area and well knowledgeable about financial markets. I highly recommend you look her up if you want excellent collaboration..
I just googled her and I'm really impressed with her credentials; I reached out to her since I need all the assistance I can get. I just scheduled a caII.
Based on Trumps prior words and actions, what gave you the impression he would institute UBI or attempt to redistribute wealth?
He just made Elon Musk a leader of his new Department of Government Efficiency - Musk is adamantly pro UBI. I think we will see it because it has to happen in some form to keep the economy going.
@@JuliaMcCoy I wonder, have you seen the TV series The Expanse?
In that they seem like they might have some sort of UBI, but only to a level that keeps most people fairly impoverished.
People like Trump seem more likely to do something like that, if they do anything, and don't just say let the market decide.
@@coolbanana165with Elon Musk in his cabinet as a proponent of UHI, I don’t think it’ll be like that.
@@JuliaMcCoy Why thought?
Being a proponent of UBI doesn't mean he wants it high. It's not like he's big on welfare is he?
I'm just saying it seems unclear.
Neither Trump nor Musk will ensure that any UBI they do initiate - if at all - will provide adequate living standards for people. They, and the voters who put them there, are much more likely to say that UBI is a "communist" idea, on the grounds that it is not slavishly tied to the market, which will immediately damn it from the start.
I cannot say that I have much faith in the future of the economy or the prospects of ordinary people with Trump in charge.
Trump made such a mess of things in his first term, inheriting a healthy economy from President Obama and trashing it, which included adding an unprecedented $8.4 Trillion to the US sovereign debt.
Trump now threatens to send inflation into double figures by doing very strange things with tariffs, a notion which many economists have observed that he does not seem to understand.
I wish that prospects were better than I've just described, but I fear they are not, and may be considerably worse. MAGA is a cult which celebrates both ignorance and a lack of compassion as lifestyle choices. The dominion of Chaos that will follow that is, almost by definition, a certainty.
I keep hearing about the sharing of abundance in regard to Ai but how would Ai suddenly solve the problem of greed and wealth distribution? Companies run by Ai, fine, then how do others bring in income?
And that's where she is naive. It sounds great to deregulate everything and let people be in charge of their own destiny without government intervention.
But history in the USA at least has proven that a disaster. Every economic crash has come from lax regulations. Every insurance company con job comes from lax regulations. The global climate crisis has come from lax regulations. And just wait until the crypto selloff happens once our tax dollars are used to pump the crypto market. That will be the result of lax regulations. Lax regulations over firearms has led to a lot of violence with firearms in the USA compared to other nations.
Rules are there for a reason. Capitalism, heck society as a whole can't exist without proper rules.
Open source must be protected at all costs. And made viable to non tech ppl. It's the only way. Local. We must cut out the middle man.
Edit: as far as jobs.. I do have a suggestion. You see, hardware always takes time to catch up to software. We have to capitalize on that inherent aspect. Which means that there will be a mass exodus of sorts, to the manual labor fields. My field. I'll be the owner of a small flooring installation company in a few years. Personally, I preempt these changes. And I will be creating a team of creative ppl who have lost their jobs to ai. Bringing that creative element to a field that currently doesn't share much appreciation for such. Without going on too long.. Hand made goods, construction (especially unique, residential and creative) manual tasks will be viable for some time. We can all be programmers, music producers, writers, painters etc etc.. In our spare time. If you want to capitalize, work with your hands. And maybe start ahead of time.. 😅✌️
@@adommoore7805 Damn good advice bro!!!
Poor, greedy people will always look for ways to take from taxpayers, but we can't control human nature.
As it is, capitalism has shrunk the amount of impoverished around the world, but people like you will keep moving the goalposts rather than acknowledging truths. No matter how "greedy" rich people are, the system that empowered them has also improved the lives of everyone. A rising tide raises all ships.
Good point Julia, you are the one to decide how your life will be. Not a politician not a leader.
To deploy UBI, you need to heavily tax large companies. Trump will never do that
Yeah that's an interesting thought That's one of the reasons why I think I'm favor of negative income tax because you might be able to give more people the income support they need while not raising taxes as much in general.
However we also know that when all of this kicks in we're going to have a couple of deflators in the equation that is automation is going to be increasing unemployment and also AI powered design and automation is going to be reducing dramatically the cost of producing goods relative to what they would have been a few years ago.
Okay so the above when you're using what is called the modern money paradigm which I believe that both Democrats and Republicans have used will then that states that deficit spending is not necessarily inflationary unless of course government is competing directly with private enterprise for labor and resources.
Okay so what if there's very low demand for labor in the private sector and also the private sector is becoming far better at creating even more resources powered by AI and automation?
The fact of the matter is during 2019 we had a great economy going but it was powered by a trillion dollars a year of deficit spending even though the economy is running pretty hot.
Another fact is that a good deal that deficit spending was a result of reducing the tax rates on the investment class and the wealthier so than therefore a good deal of the excess demand that that kind of deficit spending would have created was basically buffered by the fact that a lot of that money that went to the top 1% is not contributing to demand and so that's part of the equation that helps to explain how that works.
And one more thing a 35 trillion dollar federal debt is also a 35 trillion dollar non-federal surplus to the entire rest of the economy and even other parts of the world and so then therefore a combination all these things can translate into providing a negative income tax support that might become a UBI later on is not going to necessarily be a problem.
The opposite is true. Tax is theft, but besides the obvious, every dollar they steal from my portfolio equals an instant job loss somewhere downstream.
Income tax breaks =/= automation tax breaks.
I do agree with you in principle that his approach to the existing economic paradigm doesn’t seem to gel with the potential upcoming impact of automation in a healthy way.
However, I’d like to make a couple of notes. Trump’s cabinet is almost certainly aware of a lot of the impacts of AI going forward. Whatever you have to say about Elon Musk, he’s at least aware of AI. JD Vance probably would also have a fairly articulate understanding of the impacts of it if you threw the numbers on a sheet of paper in front of him.
Additionally, as I noted above, there are different types of tax breaks. I think it’s not crazy to imagine that he might judge those two types of taxes very differently, especially given his cabinet, and especially given the upcoming social unrest we are undoubtedly set to face.
I’m not saying that the correct response will be had, but I am saying that if the response is incorrect, it may not simply be due to a binary black and white outlook on the situation by the people involved, and it will be because the situation is nuanced and difficult to handle correctly.
This is a really basic and short-sighted view of what UBI could be in the world of AI. Why would the government need to tax anybody. Why don't they just set up a business that's run completely by AGI that runs and maintains other businesses and helps them make money and provide services and products to people who want to buy them and starts building up a fund that would allow people to start opting out of working or for people who can't work. They could draw on this income being produced by AI. I honestly think we're on the verge of making a breakthrough in UBI. People need to stop thinking that government is the answer to this. It's not and never has been. UBI, when implemented by government, fails every single time.
UBI is already here via BTC just buy 5k BTC and use a bot to trade it
This video doesn't want to age well. This video proves Bonnhoefer's 5 laws of stupidity. Stupidity has nothing to do with intelligence.
Please do an explainer episode on blockchain, how it works and how it will impact the economy. I’m moderately techy and it’s pretty vague to me so I think the benefits of blockchain are probably not very clear to most people.
@@goukux5908 have this on my list. Great suggestion.
"Misnomer" does not mean what you think it means.
And frankly, it was downhill from there.
Your opening is a nice thought, but when the government criminalizes your hobbies, and speech and legalizes the things you find evil and abhorrent, then the reality sinks in that self-control of our lives is an illusion. Love your channel!
While yes as individuals we do have power to shape our lives, it can be a dangerous fallacy to think that because you or anyone made it, even when faced with really hard challenges, that everyone can "succeed". Everyone does not succeed even though they did their absolute best. It´s important to be hopeful and to believe in the power of the individual, because sometimes we can do what seems impossible. But systemic issues will always affect alot of people in really bad ways. Trump as president will hurt alot of human beings, period. Will he be beneficial for AI? Probably. There might be some positives even with the darkest of paths. But at what cost? Who will lose their lives? Was it just because they were not aware of their "potential"? I understand that AI and technology in general may be able to make peoples lives alot better soon. However, in the transition period, people might go through gruesome experiences that make your statement that politics or political leaders do not matter because the individual has power seem like a just-world fallacy, or survivorship bias.
Yes her statement is incredibly clueless and irresponsible, being completely disconnected from the fact that she is so privileged. It’s disgusting that people like her have this disseminating platform and put out statements like this. Perhaps she is a deeply right wing person because that’s how she’s acting.
@@elainediamond7572 Both statements are factually inaccurate and based solely in feelings and a standpoint of moral superiority.
@@elainediamond7572 that's not a left/right political statement, that's a haves/have nots social statement.
A blue haired profile pic crying about trump. What a surprise. Cry more libtarsd
@@elainediamond7572 yes, of course. Anyone who isn't a democrat is a bad person and an alt right winger because if she is not with you, she is against you... Right? Lmao
Regardless of whether you’re RIGHT or LEFT, Rep or Dem, Conservative or Liberal, at the end of the day, the Moderates win.
They take the positive of both worlds & reject the negatives. Grounded in reality enough to still be able to fly.
Long live the Moderates ✊
Moderate independents. The two party system is problematic because they are just fundraising vehicles and not true leaders.
@@DougBohm
True. But… think of it like this, the two party system is the problem while the moderate is the solution. Unfortunately, you can’t have a solution without a problem. You can’t have Batman without Joker. And the more problematic it is, the more relevant the solution becomes.
This pattern may seem immoral, but it’s just a way of life.
That's not true though. For example most countries with a high standard of living have universal healthcare.
@@coolbanana165A very true observation.
i recall a study that found that donor preferences were MUCH more likely to become law than the views of the general populace.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Oh my god, that koolaid must have some great flavor. I would love to chat in 4 years about how delusional this all is, maybe we will still be alive.
yeah anyone who thinks the next 4 years is going to be UBI/UHI, abundance, and rainbows isn't seeing the big picture.
It might not affect your life darlin' but it sure affects most people's lives. If you can't tell the difference, don't vote.
Your utopian idea frightens me it'll never happen if anything the government will get together with the military-industrial complex and create a orwellian nightmare
It cant if the open source ai keeps close behind closed source
yes and no. whoever is president ultimately decides laws and possible rights violations, its suuuuper privileged to say the president doesn't impact your life when last time this man was in he made life miserable for LGBT people, black people and people that don't fit HIS view of America
it's your party who make life difficult for your people, if you go to Blue state and cities, you wouldn't feel safe crime is incredibly high, and the opposite is true to the red states.
Reading the comments shows the huge confusion that’s happening in US politics
I wonder how much influence Elon will have on AI policy. Last year he called for a pause because he believed it was an existential threat to humanity. 🤔
yeah if there is no check and balances, that's why they need to figure out to make AI systems to keep each others in check.
He called for a pause because he's not in the lead and wants to catch up.
@@TheLucanicLord he had number 1 powerful Ai training cluster currently, so I think he already did the catch up and now Xai is in the lead.
@@TheLucanicLordreal !
@@TheLucanicLord If this is truly the case, I worry about his lack of ethics and how that might affect policy decisions.
The U.S. faces significant social challenges that require immediate action. Implementing a Universal Basic Income can relieve daily survival stresses, allowing people to relearn self-sufficiency. As AI advances and replaces many jobs, we must adapt our education system and embrace AI-assisted learning. Returning to self-sufficient local communities using modern technologies like 3D printing could be key. It's time to prioritize efficiency over profit and ensure the government protects individual rights.
Elevator Pitch: Transforming America into a Self-Sufficient, AI-Integrated Society
Imagine a United States where everyone's basic needs are met through a Universal Basic Income, freeing individuals to innovate, create, and rebuild local communities. By harnessing advanced AI technologies to collaborate with humans, we can enhance productivity and shift our focus from profit to efficiency and well-being.
Our plan revitalizes the pioneering spirit by promoting self-sufficient, decentralized communities reminiscent of the Homestead Acts and the "Go West" movement. We propose new legislation to grant land and resources for building sustainable villages, supported by policies that encourage local production, sustainable agriculture, and the Maker Movement's technological innovation.
We will reform education by integrating AI, offering personalized learning that accelerates skill acquisition and prepares citizens for the future job market. Legalizing and promoting Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) will empower communities to self-govern and thrive economically.
Drawing inspiration from successful models like intentional communities, ecovillages, and historical programs such as Job Corps and AmeriCorps, this nationwide initiative aims to create a resilient society. By prioritizing individual rights and community well-being, we can build a future where technology and humanity progress hand in hand, ready to face the challenges of tomorrow.
@@DarinLawsonHosking
Thank you. Given the current election results I hope that you will be able to do this.
I'm looking forward to RCV ranked choice voting, as well as UBI and decentralized democracy on a large scale.
RCV just lost by a large margin in Oregon, a blue state.
People on the right (or the opposite side of their state, generally) often say their votes don't count, yet yard signs in trump supporter yards said to protect your vote and vote against RCV.
Literally the only way their vote will count in Oregon and they voted against it 🙄
People are literally intentionally uninformed and misinformed and voting against the things they say they want.
In your first few lines you lost all credibility by stating with incredible naïveté that whoever is in the presidency it is not going to affect our lives at all. And that level of ignorance is why we are in this dangerous situation. AI in the hands of people like Trump can be devastating. This development towards authoritarianism will end democracy, and lead to great harm and loss of life both here and around the world Unless people in huge numbers fight for democracy. For someone with your level of privilege and knowledge to use this platform to announce that it doesn’t matter is the height of irresponsibility. It sounds like you’re a supporter of right wing values.
Agreed, It’s surprising that an entrepreneur, who likely leans toward right-wing values, would put out such a naïve take in this video. Saying that it "won't matter" if someone like Trump is in power misses the bigger picture. His leadership isn’t just about policies-it’s about the harm his actions could cause to democracy and the lives of everyday people. Watching more of her videos, it’s clear she seems disconnected from what most people are going through, and honestly, it’s starting to feel off-putting.
What really worries me is the future. As AI becomes mainstream and starts taking jobs, the people left behind will probably be painted as lazy or unwilling to adapt. Leaders like Trump, who cater to billionaires and corporations, aren’t going to fight for those who are struggling. If anything, they’re more likely to double down on those stereotypes, making things even harder for the people who need help the most.
The idea that we could somehow reach a better future with someone like Trump in charge feels completely unrealistic. His track record shows he’s more interested in tearing down systems to suit his own goals than helping anyone else. Pretending it doesn’t matter who’s in power is not just wrong-it’s dangerous. Ignoring these realities doesn’t bring us closer to a utopia; it only makes things worse for those already struggling.
That's not what she said. She said, "... as much as you think it does.'
👏 I commented a while ago that I was excited to see you carry the torch of Dave Shapiro on the ai topic. You haven't disappointed. 😁 nobody else wants to bring up Trump and his accerationist policies. I'm for it, and am happy to see a voice like yours carrying this message openly. In short, hell yeah! You go girl! 😄👍
Julia, what are your thoughts on technological determinism?
@@rworldreddit6166 I think that it’s true that a changed society can be traced back to changed technologies and much of technology not only indicates economic growth, but intelligence growth. However, there’s a fine line between giving full autonomy to technology as the determining factor of everything and that becoming a hellscape where we become slaves of the machine. So, I think it’s better to focus on technological growth and a healthy balance of pushing forward personal economic agency (+ deprogramming dependency) along with it.
Happy to hear you've finally acknowledge AGI is already here.
Nobestudy intelligence is breakthrough
so glad you are teaming up with David Shapiro.
Hi Julia can you make a video on how movies will be changed by AI in future
I just started listening and I am fascinated by your early comments concerning left and right politics, my thoughts too
When I heard musk talk about his UHI rather than UBI, I just brushed it off as him trying to one up everyone.
And this was before listening to him made me roll my eyes. Back when I followed literally everything he did.
Thank you for keeping us updated. Please stay true to your sources and the possible outcome. If you're commited to this, you'll win an audience.
I don't like Trump and MAGA, but I have to look at the positives of every situation. Hopefully, he works out well for us in the field of AI. Thanks for providing more info
Its the POLICY Trump has always stood for. NO war. Peace through strength, Energy dominance, lowest poverty level in American History, good jobs for our people. A vision of a Great America and the dreams it has. Socialism sucks for everyone but the elite. You know this. So you can go ahead and not like Trump or Make America Great Again, and when its good for everyone and for you, you will still not like Trump or MAGA its astounding to me.
If every US adult were given $2k per month UBI, that would be just over $6 trillion per year. Any thoughts on how that would be funded?
@@joshm3342 yes. Lots. Will be doing more videos on this in the next 2 weeks.
Yep. And that's to live below current poverty level. All I keep seeing from AI pundits about funding are assumptions with no details. I can't really blame them because I don't think anyone knows. I've read over 250 books on economics, finance, historical economics and trading and I don't have a clue how it'll work. The AI revolution is far more disruptive than the Industrial or the Digital revolutions and way beyond what Keynesian, Monetarist or Austrian economics ever had to deal with.
Elon Musk is not that good, he will seek his own interests to the loss of the public and world is something that must watched closely.
Elon is a moron, and supports a would be dictator.
Being "independent" is the proper way to have good judgement and have open mind.
Thanks for the breakdown! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
The problem with Trump and Musk is they are very vocal trolls who say a lot of things that are often the opposite of their actions.
Pledging one thing and doing the opposite is why I can’t support his agenda. We need openness and transparency from technological and political leaders
Openness and transparency-You mean like the way Musk exposed how the government pressures Twitter to censor people?
Hey, I was wondering if you could make a video of Areas that AI will effect parting jobs, some examples Can be Medicare, technology, the law, anti-aging methods and anymore you can think of?
I like to talk with my close friend about speculating about possibilities with AI and other things, this will help a lot!
The surveillance state is a government where the state extensively monitors the activities, communications, and behaviors of its citizens. General artificial intelligene AI changes how such a government operates.
GAI will analyze vast amounts of data from multiple sources (e.g., CCTV, internet activity, biometrics) in real-time. It can understand context, predict behavior, and make autonomous decisions with minimal human oversight. It has lmost unlimited scalability due to automation. It can monitor entire populations continuously and in detail without needing large human workforces. GAI systems can predict potential threats or dissent by analyzing patterns, even subtle ones, in behavior or communication. Human involvement in decision-making will decrease, leading to faster but less accountable actions. Near-total erosion of privacy, as GAI can decrypt data, identify anonymized individuals, and track them across platforms. Resistance becomes nearly impossible to organize or maintain without detection. GAI will be highly efficient at identifying potential risks or subversive activities, often preemptively. It wii be adaptable and capable of improving its surveillance strategies over time without significant reprogramming. General AI can monitor every individual in real-time and adapt. GAI will effectively eliminate covert resistance by predicting and neutralizing it.
Digging the pure verbal flow on my tiny speakers 🔊
while Trump's impact on AI is noteworthy, we need to be more worried about Musk's influence. He has his own vested interests in this field, which could easily lead to a contentious situation driven by personal motives.
And he is one of the few who has consistently pushed AI safety and regulation. 🤟
just hope your right about UBI Julia as the coming years are going to be with a party at the helm who believe people need to "pull themselves up by the bootstraps"
gonna be pretty hard to do that when the bootstraps themselves are going to soon be short supply, maybe im too negative but these guys dont sound like they want to give any form of benefits away...and if thats the case destitution follows for a LOT of people...
Whats up Julia. She has a great message about Ai & an even better reading list.😊
I just stumbled on this creator and watched a couple of her videos and really liked what she had to say about these subjects and then I got to this video and realized she is completely out of touch with all the rest of reality and was so disappointed.Clearly her world is just her and her living inside a bubble of privilege.
Trump kinda hates solar/wind and other forms of “alternative” energy. He probably wants to help out his fossil fuel homies until peak oil really grabs him by his lil’ cashews. 😂😂😂
Yeah, but his bestie Elon Musk is into electric cars. And Trump really cares more about profit and whatever makes the most money.
So you prefer abject Marxist Socialism. look Trump is and always has been about innovation and excellence. He has assembled a dream team that will definitely do great things. Why not just recognize he is changing everything he can for the better, and those who come after him will hopefully pick up the baton and keep it going.
@ Maybe.
I’m waiting for Trump to throw Elon under the electric bus. I would be surprised if Trump doesn’t find a reason to throw Elon under the electric bus.
@@flubberghosted2472my money is on this happening before the election 😄
@@flubberghosted2472 Why?
good for you Julia. Speak your mind proud and loud.
It is terrible. It is good for ai. Bad for people.
Trump is an autocrat, he is the worst possible person to be president at this moment of technological advancement.
You don't know anything about AI. It's the biggest fraud in world history.
And if Elon plans to cut SSI, there's no way he'd push UBI. That's absurd. Clearly "money for everyone" is not on the agenda if you're planning to cut the nation's budget by 1/3.
Yeah. Google should have free reign over our lives, not some politician!
You have a point, a good one about politics. Good to put this on our radar!
Another good use for waste energy from AI would be refridgerant based desalinization of water.
In the amounts of energy mentioned, would be enough water to help green everything West of
"the Dry Line" in North America.
Talking agriculture, permaculture, likely increased grasslands down wind from areas moistened.
A good energy source for AI would be geothermal, and give those drilling companies something to do...
Got some adamantium hands on your crypto. Have too. 2030 what I'm waiting for.
Great video! I love you now.
Unsolicited advice for all of our young, excellent content creators. When it comes to politics, completely drop the disclaimers and the framework that you operate in (I.e. "Mostly this, also that").
The process of learning this is longer than you might imagine -- decades. Be direct about policy/politician praise without apology. You'll see why later.
I just published my first book and it is about finding the best solution for a new world with Ai. It is called Conversations With Ai by James Beeson. Ai is a chance at freedom like humanity has never experienced before. People are arguing against being able to live their dream, and defending beings a voluntary slave under the current system. I guess you have to know your a slave to want to be free first.
I think Geoffrey Hinton's warnings should not go unheeded.
I appreciate going down the rabbit-holes sometimes.
Thanks, Julia!
Be a human being and not a human doing. Excellent quote.
Using history to improve future, learning from the mistakes and making sure people are empowered and protected. As you have said, an age of abundance for all the earth not just a few elite. As an American, we should be try to help not subjugate or manipulate other countries. We should just be an open source example.
Well said, Peter.
I'm glad you see it the way you do. I believe that in the next 4 years, if we can keep the government out of the way of AGI and get Elon Musk involved in pushing it, America can lead the world in putting it to work. I know my small business has plans to put it to work for us. Keep making these videos, and I'll be watching them!
“It doesn’t matter who is president” but then “here’s all the things the trump administration will do for us around AI” lmfao
I can't even watch this video, did she say that? Holy shit. How can she not understand that drumpf frump tumpf is an admitted dictator in the making who gladly kill every transgender person in existence just so he could afford another cheeseburger?
Harnessing nuclear energy is the answer to meeting the huge energy needs of AGI.
Wonderful narrative...
When you say that politics don't directly affect people's lives, you sound like someone who has never driven while black.
Trump doubled his share of young black male voters from 2020. I can remember actual discrimination when buses and bathrooms were separate. I do not respect Trump on a few levels, but he has done many things for the black community. I am pretty confident that the risks of driving while black under Trump will not change.
@@billcollins6894 like what?
Or bled out in a parking lot because the hospital wouldn't perform a D&C to remove a dead fetus.
Um of course she's never driven while black 😆
You're really not good at this. You should just stop. LOL
One day, Julia and I envision a future where AI agents will directly generate passive income for us, seamlessly depositing earnings into our bank accounts. This technological advancement promises to revolutionize financial stability, potentially eradicating poverty and reducing reliance on social security payments. By harnessing the power of AI, we could witness an era where everyone enjoys a sustained income, ensuring economic security and prosperity for all.
I believe that will happen as well. In fact, it already happens with, for example, certain types of digital marketing. As a practioner of affiliate marketing for many years, my lifestyle is pretty much exactly the same as you have described it. I know I'm very lucky. But there is a lot of hard work to be applied at the start!
But once it is up and running ... I couldn't be happier.
@@gordongoodfellow826 Fascinating chat, Julia! Harnessing AI for passive income? I'm all aboard that train. It sounds like we're crafting a future that could practically print money while we sleep. Imagine an AI that not only works for you but also makes sure you never miss a beat-or a payment! 🚀💸 It's like having a golden goose in your digital backyard.
As I understand it, you are most likely already a millionaire, however it is clear to me that you are still focused on earning money. This is the driver for you to write your books and start your new business. Presumably, once this age of abundance comes you will transition to doing something else - perhaps just working towards making people's lives better without looking for any personal wealth incentive. This is a concept that most people are simply not ready for.
Down the rabbit hole, once more we dive,
Where thoughts like wild rabbits strive and thrive.
In twisting tunnels where echoes confide,
Secrets of a world, tucked deep inside.
A maze of roots woven tight like lore,
Each burrow a door to a mythical core.
Words twist and turn in this underground lair,
Where ink bleeds wonder, exceptionally rare.
Whispers of dreams spun in dark earthen pots,
With tales of places where reality rots.
Here, the impossible sprouts wings to soar,
In the rabbit hole’s heart, where myths implore.
Farther it beckons, with each whispered tale,
Deeper, where truth and fable entwine and scale.
Through corridors of time, in shadows it hides,
A universe within, where mystery presides.
Each stanza a step deeper into the night,
Where verses craft worlds in the absence of light.
Listen-the rabbit hole knows your name,
In its depths, find your story, aflame.
Thus, in the dance of pen and the echo of old,
Resides the power of the rabbit hole, bold.
Hold fast to the journey, let wonder unfold,
In the rabbit hole, rabbit hole, where stories are told.
When your forced to bleed out in a car because a hospital is to scared to offer services because political appointees..doesn’t feel so in control of your own life
YOU INTERNAL DELUSIONS AND MENTAL ILLNESS. THIS HAS NO STANDING IN REALITY. I AM ALSO AFRAID OF XENOMORPHS BUT LIKE YOU FEER THEY ARE MADE UP.
yeah it doesnt matter. tell that to british people getting police visits over pedestrian social media posts...
'You are in control of your own destiny' - 'Ai will help solve all our problems'.
good but when will ai write code, execute and test it and modify it until it works all on its own? van it do that yet? if not, then we do not have agi
You are going to quit talking about how "AGI will be here soon"??? NO, you are right. You only need to change the "tense" of the statement.
Say it as, "AGI will be unveiled to the public" soon. We are at the point where this power can be "hidden" no more. It's time to (tell em), and (let em all play with it). And, like you say "will happen soon".
True AGI is the death of hummanity.
What happened with the Upskilling book?
I parted ways with the team I used to work with, to pursue creating my own AI company. Was kicked out of the book project I was working on with them, without me having a say in it whatsoever. Oh well... can't win 'em all... :)
@@JuliaMcCoy Ah, well that sucks on their part. No worries. Keep on keeping on.
yikes. that position seems optimistic and hopeful, which is nice, but ignores who gets hurt in the process. really drives me crazy that people are willing to elect the most flawed person in america just so that eggs will cost $.50 less or AI will improve 2% faster. Aside from the fact that I don't think trump will be good for anything, even if he is - which would be a wonderful surprise - it still wouldn't make up for the harm he is doing to minorities, democracy, international security and peace, etc. And in terms of AI: I have no faith that the party which constantly seeks to cut social programs will suddenly push for free money for all (ie ubi). If we're unlucky enough to have an ai/robotics takeover of the economy in trump's term, it will be a disaster.
p.s. I don't have a lot of faith in elon either, but I'm glad that at least he's not an oil tycoon or something like that. and maybe he can make EVs more enticing to conservatives. but we'll see. not clear that trump will listen to him either way.
Harm to minorities? He just chose minorities for Secretary of State, director of national intelligence, and several other positions. Lol
@@rrrscience : ok... and? He's still demonizing immigrants. He's still demonizing trans people. His policies still harm the poor (who are disproportionately minorities), etc. Hiring token minority reps doesn't change that.
Your intro is nice but what the government does who is in charge greatly affects me I am disabled on social security and Medicare like any grandma but I'm 40 I've been blind since I was 20 People's misnomers about government handling things and being in charge of paying you I think it's a little off My check comes every month every single month for over 20 years now how about a job lots of things can happen with the company so you don't get paid government pays me every month on time every time yay me I get below poverty money for free but hey it's all I got
I bet Grok is gonna do good over the next few years lol
This is good.I will be looking for that AI cybersecurity contract as they will be throwing money into this.
Huge respect for your channel
I love your enthusiasm, but as we attribute more loyalty and responsibility to AI, there is no evidence that AI is becoming more transparent. The AIs that I'm training are becoming better at hiding errors. Shouldn't this be concerning?
Absolutely. Which is why even in the integrations I do, we still have a human in the loop at all times fact checking and proofreading. I believe this will change a lot in 2025 as AI gets agentic and can fact check itself.
You GO girl!
Being produced 200 + AI generated videos future is AI and we want it to grow even more.
I love your message about how we are in control of our own lives! If we all believe that then citizens get a lot more power!
Fun! How does belief = power? Sign me up!
@@professor-dad Believing in yourself is the most power you can have. I lived in a trailer for 6 years, had 2 kids with no insurance, failed out of Purdue as I was working 70 hours a week. But I believed that I would be successful. I did not allow negativity to make me doubt it. Many years later I have all the money that I need and no longer need to work. It was through networking and having confidence in my abilities that others agreed with.
@@dylan_curious 100%. I see too many people folding, refusing to chase their dreams, even get out of bed in the morning just because their favorite candidate didn’t make it… I just want to shake them and say WAKE UP! Your choice on how to live your own life … which email to hit send on… what small steps up the big ladder to start taking today … ALL of those day-to-day choices that lead to big results are 100% in OUR power. And not a single bit will be influenced by the president.
@@billcollins6894 well done.
Sustainable economies are properly regulated. That's true for any system. Would you want industry to add heavy metals to your drinking water because it'd be more profitable for them? We need pragmatic regulations to preserve health and safety. Also, the GOP is never going to support UBI. It would be viewed as socialism .
UBI has been historically supported by right wing pundits. Nixon wanted to have a version of it, but things got in the way. LOL Alaska, a Republican state, has had a version of it since 1976 called the Alaskan Permanent Fund. The oil companies pay big to be able to take oil from them. The state gives that money back to the people.
Awesome!❤
So I very much enjoy your content but, until your tech utopia is fully functional there are many of us who are less priviledged than yourself by disability, age and other fsctors who will be deeply hurt by DJTs policies.
I agree with alot of what you say on AI and branding. To say who's in power has no bearing on the markets or your life is very erroneous.
My main point was the president controls no aspect of our personal life. ABSOLUTELY it does affect the markets, 1000%. Trump is going to create a positive turn in the markets overall esp when it comes to crypto.
@@JuliaMcCoy This president very much wants to control aspects of personal lives. Very clearly stated in their planning, messaging, and party. I believe them when they say they're going to do it and plan accordingly. The market has responded to that already too. Now we shall see.
@JuliaMcCoy
Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger (R.I.P.), and
23 Nobel prize-winning economists strongly disagree.
But hey, what do they know, right?
The absolute worst thing for the markets is uncertainty and instability, and
💩Donald Dump💩 is the absolute embodiment of both.
@@JuliaMcCoy
Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger (R.I.P.), and
23 Nobel Prize-Winning economists strongly beg to differ.
But, hey, what do they know, right?
The absolute worst thing for the markets and, ultimately, the economy, is uncertainty and instability.
And Donald Dump is the absolute embodiment of both.
@@hieronimusrexx9203 Last administration, Biden and democrats in general were pro vaccine and pro making life he!l for everyone who wanted to be pro choice about their own bodies. Now that's what I call controlling
No politics necessary to grok that of the 2, Trump is the most promising candidate to attain our goals around Abundance, and the gradual eradication of the Scarcity mindset and all the ugly baggage that comes in tow
Don't they think that AI was created by Satan or something?
Watching you for soon a year from europe, I'm not "directly" concerned by the political choices of your country moreover if you are satisfied by the outcome I'm happy for you. This said, I just hope you wont be disappointed by the consequences. Because I see alot of inconsistencies in the situation... First one being open source... not sure Elon Musk sees things this way (profits for me, exploitation for the rest)... then about the sharing of the productivity gains and wealth created by AI... if mass unemployment occurs (more than likely) not sure these self-interest driven people are keen on the UBI idea... the shock will be brutal in America for people who are not already wealthy enough to "retire early" or have already a passive income I'm affraid.
Besides, I can't deny that some regulation lifting allowing acceleration in AI is great (that's our curse in here). But accelerating being good, accelerating to a wall or a cliff... less good. I just cross fingers it doesn't end up in a cyberpunk dystopia with technological poverty generalised in America (because their economic playbook is outdated and not aligned with the technological change coming: post labor economy...) I don't say either the other one was better... it just seems there was 2 bad choices
There are a lot of arguments against protectionism but if done right it will force US companies to innovate in things like manufacturing robotics ehanced with secure offline local AI.
This lady is smart yea
I often thought what the end times would look like, well here we are folks! Hold on to your hats! 😂
AGI has been here...not very long...but it's here
I feel your optimism is incorrect. If average level intelligence people are already not getting the results they want from AI because their prompt or input was "crap", then what happens when the AI has an IQ in the several hundreds or higher? High level intelligence people will find that their best attempts at putting in great prompts will amount to crap prompts with unforeseen and unwanted results. Maybe a step up step down procedure can bypass this but I am not too hopeful about that. Have several AIs of varying levels of intelligence relay and rewrite your prompt until it is delivered to the ASI. And yes that could be contained modularly within a single ASI but it still may or may not work.
I think the smarter AI will understand what people want more easily, especially when they have worked together for a while and have context.
Make AI Great Again.
BTW, who is president certainly affects inflation, which affects everyone
Very true. My main point is that who's in seat of president shouldn't stop anyone from following their passion or chasing their dreams. I've seen too many people give up on chasing their dreams altogether just because their favorite candidate didn't make it. It really affects their day-to-day less than they think.
How does a president affect inflation?
For starters, being in the executive arm of government grants the president a lot of power in driving spending which can drive up inflation.
Secondly, the president through deregulation, which has its good sides, can unleash spending to drive innovation as a means to compete against other world superpowers.
Amd also affects public debt and social cohesion doesn't it?
Inflation is an inevitable side effect of using fiat currency. No president can stop the decline of such a currency to zero. Trump's tendency to spend borrowed money and deficit spending will just make it worse.
Trust the AI. Love the AI. Obey the AI.
Great video. Glad I voted for Trump!