I'll share mine when I get sorted out, will share my pilatus pc24 as well, will let you fly it with me to build my hours and you can build yours as well.
I’m missing the part of the video where we see any shots of the stick moving? Any other movement you see is pilot induced and camerawork. The cirrus jet is actually much firmer in pitch and needs more effort than other cirrus. And at altitude, the forces make it hard to be precise so autopilot is strongly recommended most of the time.
Never use the autopilot to takeoff in IMC. Hand fly to the enroute segment...so the advanced avionics are mainly for sit awareness, not used to fly the plane when it's bad to the ground.
The cost to certify that capability would be more than the price of the jet! There apparently are other reasons, since no aircraft in the world is certified to take off with zero zero visibility. Just one of the problems is landing in zero zero conditions. Remember, your take off weather conditions become your landing weather conditions in the event of an emergency and you have to return and land.
Kinda. You can not get certification into RSVM space these days without having a backup/two sources of pressurization. Without a second engine and lacking an APU, there is no other source of pressurization on the CirrusJet. The reason the TBM can fly into RSVM space is because the rules were different when it got certified.
Where did you read that? This link says nothing about needing two sources of pressurization: www.aeromechinc.com/rvsm-approval-process-operations-manuals.html
Need the power of 2 engines for over flight level 280,also as mentioned one engine, one bleed air system. For small aircraft there could be a short term electrically powered pressurisation system that would be able to run for up to half an hour, which is longer than you would be in the air if the single engine was to go out, there's a parachute for no runway situations. The cirrus vision jet is great for overland regional leisure and visiting flights for sure..
Breezy Mods I used to work at a Cirrus Platinum Training center and four of our instructors got to fly one and they said that you could have a conversation in the back without talking at a higher then normal level. Have you ever flown in one?
Davedavis....yes and no.....t's really very interesting.....i found taking my headset off on the ground was much worse that at altitude. At altitude it was bad at all.....or at least as bad as I would have imagined. I was by myself in the back. But I could imagine having a conversation.
Well Breeze. The damn Williams 5Aengine is rear mounted. Just for that purpose. As the noise level is not loud. When compared to a Turboprop Wing mounted or nose... Take a course in Air Frame Design...As I know for a fact. You never been in one. As calling BS on someone you don't even know. Is the sign of someone public schooled.
6 ปีที่แล้ว
Master Chief 00117 Well said, there's always one in the comments. We call them haters. LMAO
gibbyh65 that’s probably because of the V tail design. While needed for the engine mounting location, V tail aircraft are less stable in flight than conventional tail airplanes. They did add some rather large stability yaw dampers in the tail area to help smooth out the ride, however, in flight videos I’ve seen still show some ‘fish tailing’. There is a reason you don’t see many V tail designed aircraft. Having said all that, I’d still love to own one of these!
some people are so jealous of others it is fun to see then comment on others wishing they had the chance to fly in a plane let alone this beautiful one!!
Actually he rounded out and started the flair over the threshold touching down just short of the 1000 ft. mark, you can see the painted stripes on the runway. Pretty much a text book approach and landing.
Left of center but this plane seems to fish tail substantially due to the v tail and then it’s nice to just hold it straight and not correct in flare. I flew in one 6 months back and got a good “passenger” feel :)
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
The more I have read about this aircraft the more impressive I find it. Very clever design...
I'm surprised at how loud it is in the cockpit!!
Glass cockpit. Big time! Nice!
Its like a car in the sky :D
does it really sound like a diesel generator on full load in the cockpit?
Any ideas how can I save 2 million??
I'm thinking about the same!
I'll share mine when I get sorted out, will share my pilatus pc24 as well, will let you fly it with me to build my hours and you can build yours as well.
I must say..that was exiting to watch☺👍👍
2 million USD for the plane, but how much is the cost per hour? I was wondering how much it would cost to earn a type rating.
I know im 2 yrs late, but if you buy the plane, Cirrus will cover the type rating costs for one pilot
Is there any ground effect or is it necessary to fly it onto the runway?
It has a wing therefore it creates ground effect...what specifically are you asking about ground effect?
@Premier1Driver had video of you guys. That's his home.
seems like its got a bit of an oversensitive stick. Not a good thing but can't beat the price I guess
karan mehra that's just the nature of a side stick. The SR20 and 22 both require very little hand/wrist movement to control the aircrsft
I’m missing the part of the video where we see any shots of the stick moving? Any other movement you see is pilot induced and camerawork. The cirrus jet is actually much firmer in pitch and needs more effort than other cirrus. And at altitude, the forces make it hard to be precise so autopilot is strongly recommended most of the time.
The SF-50 is really meant to be "operated" with autopilot engaged. Not built to be hand-flown.
With todays avionics, the 'zero-zero takeoff' would be much easier??
Never use the autopilot to takeoff in IMC. Hand fly to the enroute segment...so the advanced avionics are mainly for sit awareness, not used to fly the plane when it's bad to the ground.
The cost to certify that capability would be more than the price of the jet! There apparently are other reasons, since no aircraft in the world is certified to take off with zero zero visibility. Just one of the problems is landing in zero zero conditions. Remember, your take off weather conditions become your landing weather conditions in the event of an emergency and you have to return and land.
anyone know why its only certified to FL 28
rutger fitzgerald Roick rvsm?
Kinda. You can not get certification into RSVM space these days without having a backup/two sources of pressurization. Without a second engine and lacking an APU, there is no other source of pressurization on the CirrusJet. The reason the TBM can fly into RSVM space is because the rules were different when it got certified.
Where did you read that? This link says nothing about needing two sources of pressurization: www.aeromechinc.com/rvsm-approval-process-operations-manuals.html
@@rfresh1011 I'm not familiar with this FAA approved material you have referenced. It appears to be someone's interpretation of the regulations?
Need the power of 2 engines for over flight level 280,also as mentioned one engine, one bleed air system.
For small aircraft there could be a short term electrically powered pressurisation system that would be able to run for up to half an hour, which is longer than you would be in the air if the single engine was to go out, there's a parachute for no runway situations.
The cirrus vision jet is great for overland regional leisure and visiting flights for sure..
Cool, where is this?
could be KRNH - New Richmond Regional Airport in Wisconsin.
must be very loud cockpit
Actually flew in one and the noise level inside is low. Passengers didn’t need headsets and enjoyed conversations at a normal level.
Breezy Mods I used to work at a Cirrus Platinum Training center and four of our instructors got to fly one and they said that you could have a conversation in the back without talking at a higher then normal level. Have you ever flown in one?
Davedavis....yes and no.....t's really very interesting.....i found taking my headset off on the ground was much worse that at altitude. At altitude it was bad at all.....or at least as bad as I would have imagined. I was by myself in the back. But I could imagine having a conversation.
Well Breeze. The damn Williams 5Aengine is rear mounted. Just for that purpose. As the noise level is not loud. When compared to a Turboprop Wing mounted or nose...
Take a course in Air Frame Design...As I know for a fact. You never been in one. As calling BS on someone you don't even know. Is the sign of someone public schooled.
Master Chief 00117 Well said, there's always one in the comments. We call them haters. LMAO
Would be good if it was electric
seems awfully loose..
gibbyh65 that’s probably because of the V tail design. While needed for the engine mounting location, V tail aircraft are less stable in flight than conventional tail airplanes. They did add some rather large stability yaw dampers in the tail area to help smooth out the ride, however, in flight videos I’ve seen still show some ‘fish tailing’. There is a reason you don’t see many V tail designed aircraft. Having said all that, I’d still love to own one of these!
you landed in the threshhold of the runway aswell
some people are so jealous of others it is fun to see then comment on others wishing they had the chance to fly in a plane let alone this beautiful one!!
Actually he rounded out and started the flair over the threshold touching down just short of the 1000 ft. mark, you can see the painted stripes on the runway. Pretty much a text book approach and landing.
Looked good to me
Left of center but this plane seems to fish tail substantially due to the v tail and then it’s nice to just hold it straight and not correct in flare. I flew in one 6 months back and got a good “passenger” feel :)
that approach was crap
You FSX gamers crack me up. Yeah you’re so experienced!
Please tell us what pilot licenses and ratings you have?