OJ25 Episode 5 - The TRUE Story of the OJ Simpson Trial (Court TV Docuseries)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2021
- #ojsimpsontrial #ojsimpson #chrisdarden #johnniecochran #marciaclark #nicolebrownsimpson #rongoldman #truecrime #courttv #OJ25
The trials and tribulations of Detective Lange; the defense goes after one of the lead detectives.
© 2020 Court TV Media LLC, part of The E.W. Scripps Company.
Chris Darden is one of kind, he really took this case to heart. He knew OJ was a killer and he also knew his defense attorneys were full of crap. When the verdict was in Chris took it extremely hard!
🙄 Darden is a little bitch cry baby and his shoddy work as a prosecutor help OJ walk.
what a rookie.................
From the moment Vanatter failed to register OJ's reference sample in to custody at Piper Tech
to create a "chain of custody", he initiated a sequence of events that would taint the case via "reasonable doubt". But that's not all, Vanatter, doubled down and went to the coroner's office and collected reference samples from Ron and Nicole. In fact, according to Donald Freed, Vanatter didn't submit those samples until June 16, 1994.
LAPD got caught manufacturing evidence.
Too much REASONABLE DOUBT to convict.
He cared about the victims and families where the defense cared about fame and money.
nah OJ is innocent, Darden is a race traitor IMO
Worst judge ever 🤦🏼♀️
I have been on an OJ trip for the past couple days and found this on June 12,the anniversary of the murders.Crazy.Thank you for putting this gem out there.✌
You’re welcome, enjoy!
Me too.. didn't even know it existed..
@@fatsonot181 When u get a chance...👀 my comedy vids.✌🏾
with that trial being the trial of the century I have been watching it for the past few years to see if there was anything else that I missed when I watched it as it happened and man o man did I figure something out that should have enraged Americans everywhere. Something that I had not ever heard of, and I followed it from the beginning til January of 95 then saw it til the end.
Fuhrman Was Removed from the Case, The NIGHT BOTH NICOLE N RON WERE MURDERED❗️YES FUHRMAN WAS REMOVED FROM THE CASE THE SAME NIGHT AS THE MURDERS TOOK PLACE BUT WAS Granted access to the multiple crime scenes given authority to identify and collect evidence along with being a witness for the prosecution. This case was a setup. Johnny Cochran said it the entire defense said it and now all these years since then, the trial videos and other people with all of what they know are saying it. This was a Cover up a set up. The ppl knew it then and hopefully now the American people will see it.
@@jonathanwilliams5235 U don't think he did it? What about all the DNA evidence?
I watched this trial everyday. When ito got angry with Chris. It made me so angry the overt favoritism he showed to the defense at every turn and treated Marcia and Chris like crap. So unprofessional and biased not to mention mean . He should've recused himself if for no other reason than his wife was fuhrman"s superior officer .. that's a conflict of interest
They were friends that go way back ito and Darden.
Darden acted like an emotional little girl as well I’m sure you could relate to so that’s how you formed your opinion on that.
You mean ‘recused’ dear….. 😒😒😒 (and he was friends with Darden, so he expected better of him - like a true friend does!)
@@oldironsides4107 they may have been friends but it’s obvious Judge Ito was extremely aware of how he was perceived in the media and made decisions based on that. He was the wrong judge to preside over this case and wasn’t strong enough to block out the media and general public when ruling on motions and evidentiary issues
favoritism my ass, he got on the defense several times as well and he fined them at one point.
@@oldironsides4107 Yeah Darden was like an immature bratty kid, it was cringy as hell.
Thanks for the uploades I've been watching all the episodes all day 😆
Im working on a driving job and listening all day😂
Chris darden and all the lawyers enjoyed the spot light
Thx for uploading all thise Kay 👍😁
You’re welcome!
This judge had it in for the prosecutors. It was a sham from the start.
how so?
Yeah he did. He didn't even try to hide it.
LOL no troll, Ito and Darden were friends and he did admonish the defense as well, even fining them at one point.
@@jadedheartsz exactly... not to mention making the vast majority of the Furhman tapes inadmissable
Qqqq
This judge was biased from the get-go
He was bedazzled by the media attention. I like OJ but this trial was decided as soon as they finalized the jury and that is wrong. It wouldn’t have mattered what the evidence was. When the verdict was read, I was in an office with a bunch of conservative white men and we actually cheered. I didn’t want him to be guilty. How could OJ have done this?? But the more that comes out and the more I read and research, the worse I feel about this whole mess.
The judge should be in jail
How when it’s been proven that he ruled in favor of the prosecution 70% of the time !
@@wilhelmina6429 no he didn't lol stop being a victim
Maybe. But the entire process was just a dog and pony show because the only thing that mattered was that the jury was mentally retarded and/or racist.
The defense attorneys and the judge affected very little. If anything, the defense did such a poor job as to become a running joke for decades to come both legally, in public opinion and pop culture. Everyone laughs at the defense.
No, the jury was simply unintelligent and prejudice. Any mistakes made by the police, prosecution or judge couldn't have meant anything to the jury in the face of the actual evidence....unless they were racist or retarded.
The jury was simply racist and mentally retarded. And the OJ case isn't the first time this has happened in American history but it WAS the first time these prejudices and mental retardation of a jury exonerated a black man.
Lance Ito was extremely out of line many times during this trial, especially in the way he treated Marcia Clark. He clearly treated her like crap just because she was a woman and that's not right at all.
I don’t think it was cuz she was a woman I think it was cuz it’s a high profile case and he enjoyed the limelight so he manufactured drama
Wrong,Ito knew they were lying, Clark especially.Itos' wife told him the evidence.
Cuz she was a woman? Lmfao😂😂😂😂
@@philipwilliams1754right and the prosecutors undermine Judge Ito authority, Chris Darden even had to apologize to the court
The judge is so snarky and biased.
biased my ass, explain to me why he only allowed small portions of the Furhman tapes played then?
@@jadedheartsz because he didn’t want this to be a race trial but even small snippets of it was enough to turn this trial into circus, forget the victims and murders and became a trial of the lapd. Oj wants whitest black man that’s why he had to change his house to look Afrocentric to get the biased black jury to get him off because you know everybody is “racist” and oj was “framed” 😂 the amount bs that people are shows the intelligence capacity in this country.
@@jadedheartsz because he didn’t want this to be a race trial but even small snippets of it was enough to turn this trial into circus, forget the victims and murders and became a trial of the lapd. Oj wants whitest black man that’s why he had to change his house to look Afrocentric to get the biased black jury to get him off because you know everybody is “racist” and oj was “framed” 😂 the amount bs that people are shows the intelligence capacity in this country.
@@jadedheartszwhat a moronic reply. Biased doesn’t mean 100% every ruling or decision only going in one direction. Jesus Christ man.
@@BushidoVXX nah only "moronic reply" here is your lame-ass post loser nazi troll, Jesus Christ man yourself brain-dead moron, clearly you don't know what biased actually means genius.
Pretty messed up how the Goldman’s weren’t notified until hours after the fact. LAPD didn’t worry about them being notified by the press.
💯 it's very sad. Ron was not officially indentured until Monday evening . More than 12 hrs after he was murdered.
@@Nicoletta13 yeah it’s so messed up. Like he was an afterthought. The whole thing was terrible.
But didn’t they know it was Nicole’s house who is obviously OJs ex wife. It might of took time to find out who Goldman’s parents were
@@SethMacLeod95 it shouldn't have taken any time at all. Ron's driver's license was in his pocket, no way should it have taken them 12 HRS.
@@hotpiegravy2347 its heartbreaking .
I get Dardens’s frustrations, but he was unprofessional and too emotionally involved. He allowed Johnnie to get under his skin and Johnnie being his cool smooth self got the better of him . It didn’t help the prosecution that he behaved as such. Johnnie was just perfection, I believe OJ is completely guilty but Johnnie got him off, pure and simple.
Spot on
I think OJ is innocent(well of murder anyways)
You have a right to believe what you want but regardless of who the players are, it’s clear that money will help. Everytime. That, and the fact that Darden & Clark bungled this case horribly.
Too proud also. And childish.
This detective sounded more confident in the documentary than she did in court.
I know the prosecution wasn't good but I'm not remotely impressed by the defense lawyers either. They seem like a group of bullies. How dare Cochran keep bringing up poor Rodney King as a point of comparison to OJ Simpson?
Quiet nazi troll, King was still very relevant as it showed how untrustworthy that LAPD were and a few years after the trial lo and behold the massive Rampart scandal happened, so the defense was right about the LAPD all along, the prosecutors are the real bullies here.
Keep playing the race card, sound familiar?
He can play the race card all he want because it was proven some are lairs, racists, and they plant evidence. If they weren't maybe OJ would've been found guilty. Any defense lawyer would use that. If not they should to be fired. If ur tired of black ppl using the race card. Tell the racists to stop their bs.
@@EyeShadowQueenn I never mentioned race - I just pointed out how gross and misleading it was to compare King to Simpson. Speaking of race, don't you even find it insensitive that Cochran made a speech comparing Furhman to Adolf Hitler (in front of the Goldman's, who are Jewish)? No evidence of planting was ever proven - and not for lack of trying. Do you realize how serious a crime it is to plant evidence in a potential death penalty case? The maximum penalty is death itself. It's not something the DA can simply yawn and look away from. Simpson was an extremely popular man at the time. Had evidence truly been planted, the DA would have jumped at it after the trial. The only person definitely known to lie was Fuhrman and even he wasn't convicted of planting evidence but perjury for lying about using the "n" word many years previously . Fourteen police were at the crime scene before Furhman and they all only saw one glove at the crime scene.
to reiterate how crooked and racist the LAPD were.....go research the Rampart scandal
Chris Darden is one lawyer for which I have complete respect.
Why? His acting of displaced outrage?
You don’t think he could tell a microphone was on as his voice wasn’t going through speakers ?
The problem I have with him comes from something he said in his book. He said that they hoped for a hung jury so there would be a retrial and that he wouldn't be back for the retrial. Uh, excuse me, Mr. D,, but you have this strong case against Simpson and know he is guilty as hell, you have 2 victims crying out from their graves for justice, and you give up. Boy, if I was one of the victims' families, I'd have torn him a new one for thinking that garbage.
Definitely a profile in courage (him and Shipp). They stood up to do what was right....regardless of what a lot of people in their own communities thought.
Chris Darden was loud and wrong at the same time. Chris Darden was wanting to grandstand and unfortunately his timing was off. #whoisaware 🤷🏽♀️
This case showed how much the police didn’t care about Mr Goldman’s son.
But in the first hours after the murders he was not yet identified, so they didn't knew who this victim was.
If the blood led from the bronco to the front of the house when did he go to the back of the house and drop the glove? 🤔
The blood was everywhere when the detectives first attended in the early hours & started their investigation.
OJ was in Chicago at this point, so how can they have planted OJ's blood at the scene, in his car, on his driveway,hallway, socks,, gloves, if they hadn't even took OJs blood at this point.
Detective says "when the sun came up the blood spots at OJs home were seen leading up his driveway.
Kato also saw the blood spots marked as evidence on the driveway early morning as he was taken to the station for his interview.
You can't plant a man's blood that you haven't yet drawn..🤔
Murders June 12
Oj gave a blood sample the 13th
Are you under the impression they gathered all evidence in an 8 hour span.
Detective Tom carried ojs blood to the scene his blood had edta. Ron and nicholes blood were in ojs bronco along with edta. The song the gate. Weeks later. And edta in ojs blood as well.
It reeks of planting evidence or cross contamination.
And such itty bitty amount of blood from a bloodbath.
Lapd were god. They did what they wanted and always got away with it.
It took a rich guy to expose there procedures f how they treat a crime scene.
The travesty about this trial is the amount of people who have been wrongfully convicted from horrific forensics and detective work. Contaminating everything. Collecting blood samples with no gloves or just wearing the same gloves for every sample.
They stored the samples in a hot car all day long. When asked why they didn’t use a fridge. Head forensics jung stated that the fridge only would run for several hours
The incompetency is unreal and that’s why oj was not guilty
You would have to have extreme bias and strong feeling to convict someone with such blatant shennegans.
Say oj did do it. Off the evidence you can’t convict because it was so botched from the first moment.
Clearly you didn't watch the trial. Colin Yamauchi testifiec that he and Mazzola processed the collected swatches and dried them for 16 hrs.. Yet when Dr. Henry Lee and the defense lawyers inspected the bindles they found:
1) no signatures
2) wet imprints
3) shapes if imprints don't match the swatches.
It's called: SWATCH SWITCHING.
Explain to me how there was barely any blood inside O.J.'s house if he really did kill Ron and Nicole, he would've been covered in the stuff.
@@psps6623 only one "simple minded" here is you jackass
With all due respect, to people alive as well as deceased, I'm almost 60 years old. The defense team, while attempting to do their job, was reprehensible. The prosecution team, although honorably invested, was mismanaged and intimidated. The investigators, trying their best, screwed up even simple stuff. Ex; Of course OJ was a suspect.! Why deny that simple point? Roughly 75 percent of murder victims that are married have a spouse involved in some way. And this guy had a history of battery!! Notwithstanding, we are concerned for him and his children as well. How difficult would that have been for law enforcement?? Now the judge, who is as important as ANYONE in a capital case, was absolutely out of his element. A narcissistic little person, WHO SHOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM, was as flimsy as the media. Every major decision went in favor of the DEFENSE. Any fair person realized that, even back in the day! Actually, ITO would fit right in today with this woke garbage that pervades us all. BUT... these murder victims were members of good families. They were innocent people who were slaughtered. That's a fact. And for what?? What if those victims were your family members? Would race matter? Would courtroom theatrics matter?? You bet your ass it wouldn't!!! Period. May God bless us all 🙏
Had he not allowed the camera,we would not have seen the glove didn't fit,Furhman lying and pleading the fifth.
@@philipwilliams1754 he had to plead fifth because of the perjury about saying racist things it was a set up for him to plead the fifth on everything cause if he answered no I didn’t plant evidence he has to answer all the questions about the tapes and if he lied about one thing he would be screwed. So his counsel said plead fifth. He didn’t plant shit cause it was impossible. The defense had no evidence of tampering or planting evidence. They just attacked the lapd mistakes on few things and turned into lapd framing oj conspiracy theory and the black jury ate it up because you know all cops are racist, slavery and Rodney King and all wrongs that were done were taken out on the victims who were slaughtered by that animal who btw didn’t even want to be black.
IDGAF: the police deserve a large chunk of the blame in this case. They messed up and turned a case that could have been very cut and dry into a debacle--and the one cop is still saying "So what" about mishandling evidence? A killer walked free you a$$hole, that's what!
I thought some of the scenes on Netflix where dramatization scenes, apparently those events did actually happen!!!!
You mean on American Crime Story? Some of those scenes didn't exactly happen in real life, but some were pretty accurate.
@@jadedheartsz Yes on American Crime Story
Racism killed this case and robbed Nicole and Ronald’s family of justice. So wrong
get lost nazi troll, OJ was innocent.
Racism were? You mean the racists on the prsecutors team and the racists cops?
Exactly racism doesn't exist
Judge ITO was clearly on the defense side and enjoyed the power of being on TV ... case was a joke ...
Absolutely. Pretty poor behavior by a judge. He was definitely trying to make name for himself. Always threatening people or holding them in contempt.
@@hotpiegravy2347 You are right,that's why he didn't allow any of the evidence of Ron and Nicoles' friends whom were murdered.
You are completely wrong Judge Ito was on the prosecution side. There was so much evidence that should have not been admitted but he allowed it. The tapes about detective Furhman, only allowed the jury to hear a tiny bit of it but the jury did not hear about Furhman talking about planting evidence. The problem is that the prosecution was not used to meeting their match.
@@terryvarta9306 BULLSHIT ..what fuckin judge allows a defendant to talk and claim innocent without being cross examine ? ITO DID !
The prosecution had no case And they were acting like children as a result.
I don’t understand why Furhman acts as though he isn’t or wasn’t racist? I’m confused about his condescending and condemnation of the court when he can be blamed for the sole reason that the case was lost. Like am I missing something here 🙄🙄🙄🙄
No, you’re on point but the reason why he acts this way (in my opinion) is simply because he’s in denial, and by remaining to act this way he believes that he ultimately has to be given the benefit of the doubt.. because he was a cop. Racism within the LAPD in those days was just.. ridiculously rampant . The way many of them (especially 3rd shift) would refer to black people over the police channel when communicating with one another was just shameful and very unprofessional. So it comes as no surprise that at least one or two happened to have ended up working the scene of that murder that night.
Ito= biggest joke for a judge. Unreal his behavior and more unsettling that he wasn’t taken off the bench.
Ito sided with the prosecutors 70% of the time so I'm not sure what you're crying about.
@@imadbasayev8541 👍👍
@@imadbasayev8541 lol totally wrong. I watched the whole trial and I was for OJ and that statement is so false.
@@kevinhill9431
Not false at all. Rewatch it with your eyes open. Ito fucked the defense on every big decision.
@@imadbasayev8541 How about him allowing the defense to play the tapes of Furman discussing the movie script ? Totally irrelevant.
Judge Ito favored the defense numerous times during the trial. Much respect to Chris Darden. A good man.
LAPD forensics didn’t think DNA was going to be a big thing and paid the price with poor contamination prevention. That was the entry that the defence used to sow seeds of doubt in the already primed jury.
Sad but true
They could have had photographs of OJ holding a knife in front of Nicole that night and that jury would have been like ehhh seems a little phoney
Its hindsight now but the prosecution put too much emphasis on DNA and lost the jury. Jury was probably bored after a day or 2 of dna testimony and the defense totally exploited the DNA.
Darden might be a good man but he was really outmatched in this trial. Cochran goaded him into doing that glove demonstration which was a huge mistake.
Did anyone notice Kato said he didn’t know where OJ was when the detectives knocked on his door but yet he was helping him with his luggage when the limo was there
KATO WAS COKE HEAD..LOL
He was confused because he was awoken from sleep.
How TIME FLIES 🦅
I never get tired of looking at O J
So you enjoy looking at a murderer? Wow.
Cochran antagonizing the prosecution team, specifically Chris Darden is in bad form. Unprofessional. Only cared about winning the case, didnt care about justice, this was about his activism, his personal grudge against LAPD and his ego.
The judge being bias is also in bad form.
He did his job as Defense attorney
So why didn’t the officers inform Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson parents in person?
Ron Goldman was not identified within the first hours after the murders.
40:47 my heart goes out to this man. That was rough.
Franky Fred was fired fourdays after his son was murdered,there's no evidence he ever worked in Illinois.No evidence he has worked since his sons' murder.
I totally agree especially since his son was literally at the wrong place and time...Ron really just walked up on the scene as it was happening...the pain of losing a son so violently and his sister? I feel for her too...he was her hero
The question no one seems to want to ask, is where did Fuhrman get Simpson's blood , if not at the crime scene. Assuming he planted the blood.
True 🤔
It's a fact that Vanatter had OJs Blood,Nicole's blood and the sock...He took it Home with him...Watch the episode before towards the end
39:00 why would she say that?
The police mishandled the physical evidence/crime scene and that left an opening for the defense to take advantage…. That’s why I don’t get why cops don’t follow by the book every time. It can lose cases. I feel, also, like Chris Darden was like a lamb to slaughter. Feel for the guy.
Jonnie still owns space in Darden's mind-rent free!!!
Circus what a shame
Drives me crazy every time court tv refers to the West LA Division station as the west Hollywood station.
They’re several miles apart down Santa Monica Blvd aren’t they? I don’t live in LA but have family in Brentwood Glen that I’ll visit with, so I’m a little familiar with the area.
great job fro the judge
Judge Ito was more worried about what the public thought instead of what the law states
Watching Fred Goldman break down makes me sick that these greasy defense lawyers got Simpson off from an obvious murder charge.
Fred is married to the exwife of Marvin Glass,a convicted drug lord and murderer.Kim Goldman has a brother and a boyfriend murdered.
@@philipwilliams1754 Let’s say that nonsense is true, what does that have to do with this murder case?
@@johnnyd1391 It means Fred had to be moving in the drug world to know those people.
@@johnnyd1391 My story is Ron was the intended victtim.The assailant's followed him to the murder scene.
Mr. Growney don't feel sorry for Mr. Goldman, Fred Goldman stated that he often looks at photos of his son's severely mutilated lifeless remains lying in the bushes from the crime scene. Which brings a smile 😊 to his face knowing Ron didn't suffer long at all. More than likely his blood pressure plummeted and he (Ron) lost consciousness before he knew it and woke up dead in the upper room.
"I'm Roger Cossack and this is the room I keep my sittin'-Chair in"
I have never seen or heard of the eyeglasses being found and or produced.
Where was the smoking gun evidence ? He was a woman beater . But where was the smoking gun ?
Judge Ito is partial for the defense!
Bet he wouldn't be if it was his daughter murdered😏😔
Raise your hand if you remember EVERY word you used in a 10 year period. Did every word you said in a 10 year period rally reflect how you felt?
You guys get my point?
Imagine yourself bring questioned by an aggressive and intimidating bully who is hell bent to assassinate your character at every turn.
How would you answer the question: "have you used ______in 10 years?
Have you EVER used the word ____?
Put your prejudices of Furhman aside for a moment. Seriously
Think about what you would do if
Knowing no matter what you said in response you would be damned either way
Bottom line. This live of questioning by flea bailey was WAYYYYYYYY beyond the scope .. ito should've never allowed it
Not every word but demeaning and obstruct words of course you’d remember. U put ur hand on the book tell the truth or lie whichever one u can live with.
@@31bigfree so you're saying you remember EVERY SINGLE NASTY DEMEANING WORD You've SAID IN A 10 YEAR PERIOD???
Come on.
The bottom line is Furhman was in a no win situation .it didn't matter how he answered those questions ( which were so beyond the scope and never should've been allowed in)
Scheme team should've left it alone the moment Furhman answered "I don't recall "
THAT was his answer ..but don't ncr the scheme yeskd ONLY chance at winning this case was to make it about race as there was no merit in ANYTHING else .remember Shapiro wanted the killer to plea out o a lesser count of homicide .
But the scheme team slithered their way around every loophole .
Furhman has explained WHY he pled the 5th to everything
He had to !
Now as for those tapes. They are absolutely horrible and I do not defend that language . I also DO believe it was for a screen play .a TRUR rotten racist would not have African American co workers to play basketball with . S rotten racist would NOT invite a black family to his home for dinner and a rotten racist certainly would NOT work GARD to exonerate a black man for the murder of a white man.
Yet that's exactly what Furhman did mere months before Simpson slaughtered Ron and Nicole!
10:00 Ron showed me a smear at front door,
19:00 I told him to check the entire gate,
25:00 "
27:00 "NOW when the sun came up everybody can see the blood,
"Out towards the sunroom at the front of the house."
At that point I was going to tell her.
35:00 "She calmed down in a little BIT to the point where she asked
40:00 after the body was move his pockets were checked. his cdl was found in one of his pockets,
42:10 "in the MIDDLE of the night."
How come they did not send anyone to her parents house not just to notify them(although technically they were her next to Kin). But to check on their well-being¿
Like they said they gave OJ special treatment cause of who he was
@@kellylee5574 Planting blood and gloves on him is special treatment to you¿
Exactly. That made them look even worse than they did already.
@@daffyduckfan4478 If OJ didn't do it then who did? Who else would have a good enough reason to kill them? OJ was jealous some other guy was smashing his ex wife and enjoying what used to be his 🐱. You have to be incompetently dumb to believe he didn't have the motive to kill her (Nicole). Ronald Goldman was just happened to be there at the wrong place at the wrong time. He was going there to smash OJ's 🐱.
@@brandonsavitski If you watched the trial then you would know that her enemy list was long. She was a horrible human being to people. Not to mention she was a drug addict So it’s a great chance that it was drug related.
Ito was payed off. Darden was a good man but also was a hot-head but a lot of people would be a hothead over a rigged trial. Ito was a total scam as was the jury.
Omg this would never happen today ever he would have been guilty
Judge Ito was so wack. He sucked from gavel to gavel
The fact that the jury hated one of the detectives for telling the truth really proves how stupid they were.
You are saying they were stupid because they were black ? That's just show your racism
What truth? The one you want to believe?
@@msbrando i agree
The jury were by and large unsophisticated and uneducated. They reacted emotionally rather than looking at the evidence on its own merits mostly because they couldn’t understand it. They were easily manipulated by the defense by baseless statements that they gave more weight to than physical evidence most of which went over their heads.
you dont know the jury hated the detectives
Blood leading from crime scene to bronco to Simpsons house and bedroom!!! DNA does not lie!;!!! Case closed
As I listen to these, one thing continually jumps out; the entire premise of this series is that OJ did it, got away with it and this is how. I’m also reminded here of the fact that stories (often times) are told to the advantage of whoever is telling it. Still, the series is well done.
@Hal Colombo maybes, question marks and speculations? Seriously? What does that have to do with an observation? Btw, I’ve lived through the assassinations of JFK, MLK, RFK, civil rights, the Korean, Vietnam and both Iraq wars.... what does age have to do with the cost of tea in China?
@Hal Colombo of course it’s speculation when 12 (after hearing “only” evidence) say he’s not. Moreover, (pay attention) where in my comment did I write he did or didn’t commit this crime? When I write, it’s about what is, not feelings. Finally, why are you so emotionally attached to arguing about an 18 month old series assessment that had nothing to do with guilt, innocence, “your” feelings, or “your” beliefs? Move on to something that has meaning or at the very least is real.
@@danielvazquez7482For the record, the jury's decision is just that, a decision. It doesn't change how much evidence suggests he did it. This is the same as any legally inclined person at the end of a trial saying someone was "found" guilty vs. someone "is" guilty.
Also, you say they heard "only" evidence. What else are they supposed to hear in reaching a verdict?
Judge Ito ruled against evidence be admitted with the knitted cap and fibers found on it from the bronco , the cap was found at the scene which was analyzed by an FBI Lab . This is outside in the dark creeping that the standing judge on a case is deeming crucial evidence inadmissible.
This is why the cameras needed to go. The judge the defense even oj knew when cameras were on him mostly were posturing for the cameras. Also things said while the jury was out of the room got back to them during conjugal visits weekly w/ loved ones.
I get where you are coming from, but part of me is glad that they were there, so the POS that OJ is, was exposed. This was pretty much pre internet, and the cameras allowed all of us to hear about the evidence in a way that we would have had difficulty getting to, without them. Your average person isnt going to find and read trial transcripts. I think less people would knkw the truth had it not been televised.
My opinion only.
Chris Darden is a very interesting and sensitive man. Marcia Clark and he became very close and developed a romance during this trial or at some point. I can easily see how this could happen.
Nicole's father must've been a pretty weak man. First of all to raise a daughter that doesn't value herself enough to not marry a batterer, then to not have it set up to where OJ knew that this was one woman that he better not put his hands on, then I heard he encouraged Nicole to go back to OJ because OJ had some investment connections, then to top it off I've never seen him in not one of these interviews. Smh
I agree with this assessment.
Pedantic Cochran always distracting the fallow minds of the jurors with minutiae. To wit, Detective Lange, did you record the times when you changed your gloves? Did you use formal or colloquial English in your notes? Did you use cursive or print script? Did you use a ballpoint pen or no. 2 pencil? How many times did you have to potty during the investigation? Did you wash your hands after each time? Did you record each washing?
So much irritating, distracting and meaningless questions
distracting my ass troll.
@@W.Khairi nah that's you fool
Why couldn’t they can’t take a run next to Kin in person. They didn’t know if their life was in danger. Same thing with Nicole family.
Gee I lost my head
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." That's what Martin Luther King said.
This,was an injustice. Not just OJ's acquittal but the reasons and the manner of it, the cynicism and despicable use of a very sensitive wedge issue, like race, to free a murderer.
By Simpson, and by his defence. Johnny Cochran knowingly committed an injustice here.
If you think it's alright for a black jury to convict a black person, then there will be backlash (as there was), and worse, now you have opened a Pandora's Box.
Now, a jury of any group, can acquit a member of that group of any crime, no matter how heinous.
Meaning: in any given case if you control the jury, you can control the outcome.
That's unjust. That's not justice. It's a threat to justice.
So yes, the OJ Simpson trial, and particularly the verdict, was an injustice.
And an injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Ito was a joke
too bad this didn't happen later when dna was much more solid .. if oj had been guilty, he wouldn't have had anywhere to run and his dream team wouldn't have saved him
DNA evidence was rock solid in this case, the problem was the prejudiced jury and dumbass tv star wannabe judge
For this cops to say that being questioned on how messy all the evidence was collected is 'just little things'that do not matter is chilling....
Yeah and I rolled my eyes when Fred Goldman dismissed it in the previous episode.
That case got me to buy a White Ford Bronco in mint condition for only 6G because the owner who hated OJ wanted to get rid of it ASAP after the verdict..(true story)..!!!
@@hectorherbert6585 interesting, I heard Ford discontinued the Bronco after the infamous chase because they weren't comfortable with that kind of publicity that it had. Also on O.J.'s direct-to-DVD reality show "Juiced" he actually tried to sell that same Bronco in the chase as part of a sketch advertising it as having "great escapability" LOL.
@@jadedheartsz Didn't know about FORD"s decisions to end the Bronco"s production at the time ,but I bought mine in NJ as I lived in NY and some dudes in the streets would shout "hey OJ' at me as I drove by..pretty insane ..!!
Ahhh, so Denise planted this firmly in the minds of Lang and co initially. 🤔
After some thought....if Denise isnt lying and she did say what she had said then you are right. Denise might have obstructed justice by planting the seed that OJ did it.
also if Lange was sooo used to all these questions from defense lawyers, maybe he should've done his job better.
If dardens comment from the transcript is correct, there’s nothing there that is contemptuous especially In comparison to cochrans comment. Pure manufactured drama by the judge
I personally think jury system in the United.State needed to be change
1992 Rodney king LAPD trial 1995 Oj simpson trial
Becauae of the jury system it turned out to be the race matter
1992 Rodney King trial and 1995 Oj simpson trial if it wasn't for the jury system these court trial vertict could have been come out appropriately
4 gee I lost my head
We’re just going to sit up here and act like police do not do unconstitutional things.
For real. They just freaking jump that fence without nothing just because they think someone is in the house bleeding or dying 😒😒😒😒
@@LilAthetruth Didn’t even consider whether the parents were bleeding or not. Since when did white people become so concerned about black people well being over the well-being of white people?
Furhman likes the idea being labelled being the worst person to walk the earth
11:00 ron showed me gate, blood on gate, smudges. Lange
you pointed them out to fung, he didnt do it.
Why does Vinnie feel the need to shout?
I
The law system United State have this point
It is impossible to have a law and order system inside the United.State
So..racist fuhrman was the one who found the blood speck in the bronco AND the glove on the side of the house?? 🤔 Interesting
This OJ simpson trail The trail of the century
As I was watching this OJ simpson trail from the beginning part to the end did not make any sense
The final verdict already was being made in the first place
Chris Darden rocks and Detectives Lang and Adder did a great job and all were crucified. What a shame.
Is that you Christopher?
Darden got roped into a fight he wasn’t ready for an honest man can’t survive long in a room full of liars
@@ImNotNotAllCityChi That is the truth buddy. :)
Yes , it is a shame. The case was never about the 2 people that were slaughtered. Had Simpson been a white, non celebrity with all the evidence, he would have been convicted.
@@gerteeee no they would have actually investigated the scene properly and maybe arrested Jason Simpson found the murder weapon and gotten the truth from Faye resnick about the drug operation at meza Luna and her role as a mule and the real reason she chose that week to go to “rehab”
7:50
Judge Ito was an idiot and so much for the defense. He handcuffed the prosecution so much.
he was a fan of cockran
nah Darden was an idiot and Ito actually refused to allow a lot of evidence in for the defense including Resnick's drug connections(which I firmly believe was what actually got Nicole killed).
@@aboowolak8246 he was also friends with Darden.
At min. 35:00. Is when the truth is told.
nah
I actually like Judge Ito ,the prosecutors undermined his authority, he knew that ,that's why he sided with ,the defense team alot😂,also being on television didn't help either ,the judge did his best to not turn his court into a circus, Marcia Clarke messed up ,she shouldn't have used Furman as a main witness,she was aware of Furmans history
First walk no prit.. kindly chse k notes
17 if you don't attack cops
Ito always ruled for the defense!
He's in chicago..
3 or 5.
7 I apology to the court
24 lang said ok go
35 she became upset wanted more info
Objection ! Rodney King is Irrelevant to this case !
30:39 damn o gal’s got a rekieta nose lmfao!
Tanya Brown got the bad end of the stick.
25 he was in chicago
11:08 Did the white envelope actually have the glasses in there?
Ray still being questios. From. Medai
23 streaks of blood