Stephen is a lot of fun to listen to. I've really enjoyed this series with Gordn and him. Thanks for showing off some future features even if they'e early stage. Exciting stuff!
I went 850 7900xtx Hellhound Spectral white with a Ryzen 7700x. I have Water cooled CPU and 6 rgb fans and 2 m.2 SSDs. Works just fine. Draws about 500-620 from the wall while gaming at 3840x2160 ultra settings.
Added note .. You also have to think about what is going to be your next CPU and GPU requirements because chances are your PSU will outlast your system.
@@earthtaurus5515 .. I have a tendency to overclock but the CPU and GPU overtime and when I first get it. Problem is the new CPUs and GPUs when they first become available, absolutely are not listed in any PSU calculator. On a footnote, I think I ended up with the smallest PSU (1200W ASUS Thor) for my system and potentially the next GPU. When your GPU alone can draw a constant 600W plus transient and your CPU an easy 350W not to mention a pump, fans loaded with LEDs, etc .. I probably should have gotten a 1600W and not have to even think about it...
@@DJaquithFL the issue with 1600w is your breaker might not actually be able to handle that. on a US 15A circuit youre awful close to the limit with just the pc, add in monitor and accessories you might actually pop a breaker
@@bradhaines3142 .. RE: 1600W potentially tripping a 15A .. No argument there especially with spikes and transients. _FYI wattage real world. Gaming on my i9-13900K, RTX 4090 and my Corsair Flex (240W brick; I haven't isolated its load) I'm not even hitting 700W at stock combined off my UPS._
Very informative video, I really enjoyed it. Apparently with these new power supplies it isn't really necessary to buy bigger just in case to avoid crashes. Of course you still need to buy a reasonable size for your use case, but at least it shouldn't crash if some component (most likely the GPU, I guess) pulls more power than expected for a few milliseconds.
I am finding that most calculators are grossly higher than what you should get, probably to cover their asses. I ran two tests recently. One PC with an i9-9900 and an i5-6600k. The i9 has 32gb ram, a 12gb 3060, 2 X 2tb NVME drives, a 20tb EXOS, and a blu ray drive. The i5 machine has 3 X 1tb SATA SSDs, and a 2070 Super. The i9 has a 650w PSU. The i5 has a 500w PSU. I plugged both machines into a 1000w Jackery Explorer and ran Cinebench for a max load. The Jackery has a built in wattage meter. i5 machine peak wattage was 225w under a max load. The i9 was 215w. The Newegg calculator was the closest at both machines from 500-600w. I feel comfortable with the PSUs (both Corsair). I’ve had no issues with either machine, and the i5-6600k is being swapped for a lower power consumption i7-7700. 650 - 750w is probably the sweet spot for over provisioning while still saving some money.
I also like to over provision the wattage so that it doesn't have to work so hard. If a PSU runs at close to the rated value it'll run hotter and doesn't last as long. Also, the hotter the more noise it will produce to get the heat out of the psu. It's good to know the power settings of PL2 is an average, it can spike up (far) above that. A good power supply should be able to take short duration spikes though. So I'm not sure this feedback feature is going to be that useful. Only scenario I can think of is accidentally putting a 4090 or more power hungry GPU in a system with a small PSU that can't handle. Well like that's ever going to happen, right? Another use case would be if the PSU is getting old and the components like electrolytic capacitors, especially the high voltage ones may have worn out and spikes are getting harder to cover. The PSU would last a bit longer if the CPU scales back at that point, also indicating that it's time for a replacement. A soft failure is always better than a hard failure. But both are pretty niche usecases. I'm sure system builders will be able to push the price points further down at the cost of quality components. I'm not sure if that's a good trend.
I just bought a Seasonic ATX 3.0 Titanium 1300 watt, hopefully, the last one I need for a long time after several wattage upgrades. The increasing power requirements became tiresome.
This video answered a question that I had on my current 3900X/5700XT system because I suffered a black screen with my Seasonic 850 watt PSU running transcoding software that utilized my 5700XT. My next system will allow for spikes and use a more efficient GPU... such as Battlemage.
The hardest part is finding a reputable small PSU for a low power system where you care about efficiency (eg for a low power server or iGPU build) Q: Why is every reputable retail ATX/SFX low wattage PSU bronze/white, but you can get stuff like that in micoatx and flexatx form factors
I bought the sfx_l rog loki 850w platinum for my 4070ti and 13600 k the thing is that its in an atx build did i make any sort of mistake there? Does that make the psu unreliable?
Its easy 55-80% power suply usage for the best and most efficient result, you can see this on 80 plus the best result is when the powersuply is over 50% load and under 85%, this does not mean that a good powersuply will give you problems with your system, it just mean you get the most money out of the powersuply
How to mesure the usage of your psu ? The Most easyest way IS to use bequet Homepage because your Motherboard/SSD/RGB/Fans and so on will use Power from the psu too and this can get Up depend in how much and powerhungry Things you use beside of the CPU and gpu
This year in particular, I don't think that I've seen as much stupidity in the PSU market. No availability of ATX 3.0 PSUs and LMAO none of the PSU companies had a working calculator for the current CPUs and GPUs until a month after launch. Brilliant! Absolutely brilliant!!!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 5-star in Duh!
I never knew till now that a 13700K CPU can draw up to 300w from the PSU. I had looked at the specs that tell me it is 125w and assumed that was what it drew. I learned something new. I would be fine with a 850w PSU with a B760 mATX board, a 13700k and a 3060TI GPU, yes? Or should I go 1000w? Or even 1200w?
The 13700k runs weird. It has random e-core load surges while on idle. Even when I updated my Asus z790 Hero bios, it felt like it got worst. I don't even overclock or mess with wattage. I'm not sure if it's an Asus motherboard issue but my 13700k has random power spikes and core spikes.
CPU manufacturers and GPU manufacturers better start backing down on power requirements. It is totally crazy, up to 1000 W for these components, I don't like Apple but for under 100W you can buy a pretty good machine.
That's because new CPUs and GPUs are basically running at a default setting like a heavily overclocked system 10-15 years ago - undervolting and lowering the power limits can save a lot of power for few % of performance but also lower the temps and noise...
I think this episode kinda backfired because it adds to the FUD around PSU's and creates a lot of uncertainty about how much power a CPU uses, (except the one particular CPU) and voltage spikes featured in the video.
also wondering if geek bench scores is low due to cpu sacrificing its performance for it to not shutdown, is there anyway to inform users that the system power is high and 12vo is limiting cpu power and show the users like windows notifications?? or else like intel software in the background? cause shuttingdown because of power insufficient of psu is a big slap message to user but 12vo unless youve run geekbench you can see the effects of throttling cpu power for staying a system alive and not to shutdown.
There's an MSR with bits that get set for each throttling reason (power limit, temperature limit, external signal from VRM overheating, etc). I can't say for sure without looking up the manual, but they've probably assigned a bit for I_PSU% throttling. Microsoft (or Intel in their platform driver?) would need to make a service to check those bits and raise a desktop notification.
The efficiency of the PSU is calculated based on its load, meaning that it will be, let's say, 90% efficient at a certain load and less efficient at different loads. If I size the PSU thinking at the spikes, there is the risk to pick a PSU way more powerful compared to what will be the average everyday load. As a result, wouldn't this PSU be less efficient compared to a less powerful one? If this is the case, what is the point to pick a 80 plus gold PSU then? The only advantage would be given by the quality of the components, like for example the ability for the higher tier PSU to work at an operative temperature of 50°C instead of the usual 30°C or 40°C offered by cheap models. I'd rather size the PSU thinking at the TDP of the components, leave me a 100W margin over the estimated full system power consumption at full load, undervolt both the cpu and the gpu, and don't do rendering with both of them at the same time. Seems more reasonable, or not?
750w fits most systems, but if you have the money, do a lot of research and it may be worthwhile to buy the biggest baddest and most reliable 1200w psu that will last you until the end of times
I couldn't help but giggle a bit over the use of Geek Bench by an Intel guy. I just started imagining every other benchmark is banned by corporate. LOL
We kind of already knew 13 gen Intel can use a lot of power. This is the new normal vibes for 25 min. I almost fell for it... for like 5 min. Except 12600k, many AMD, eco modes and voltage limiting, etc exist. RTX 4090 kind of requires super CPU. But that's niche and only 99% true. As for ATX12VO I look forward to it. I have no cables besides 12V CPU, GPU and MB in my system. All my drives are NVME for a few years already. And that fat old 24pin MB cable looks (and is) stupid here in 2022. Unfortunately for now there are just a handful of power supplies and even less MB with 12VO afaik.
The title is entirely misleading. This video doesn't tell us how to pick a power supply wattage at all. There's no information of how to choose a power supply. The video only demonstrates how manufacturers and technicians can use multi thousand dollar equipment to calculate how much power a computer would draw. That's completely useless to the rest of us.
The most annoying connector in the PC world (no pun intended) is not the CPU, not the GPU, but the infamous 24pin monster. Please Intel do something about, now that even a 600W GPU can work with a small 12+4 connector, why we still need such a giant 24pin oversized connector from the Jurassic, for just 100W typical max power used by motherboard (as the CPU has its own power). The 24pin connector could be much much smaller!
What's the problem with the connector? Does it annoy you optically? You just plug it in one time - it could be double the size and I wouldn't care. 🤷🏼♂️
@@jelly.1899Obviously you never tried to design a mini pc so you don't care. But for me it is a hobby, so I care. The problem with a 24+8 (32) pin connectors are not the connectors, but the fact that they force you to route 32 cables trough your case up to PSU, and if the case is small they take a lot of space, block airflow, and made several parts difficult to access. And that is because a legacy design from the 90's, totally unnecessary nowadays. Today we can have high gauge in very thin affordable cables that were not available in the 90's. As an example the new 12VHPWR standard can carry up to 3 times the power of those 32 pin, and it does so using a connector that is 4 times smaller in size and only use 8pins for power and ground plus 4 control pins. All other areas are improving, in fact there are laptops over 250W that only need a small barrrell, and in the smartphone arena the USB-C can carry up to 240W. But the Jurassic 24+8 pin connectors are still blocking SFFPC advances.
Dont cheap out on your power supply. The power supply is an overlooked part of PC building because quite frankly its a boring piece of hardware, but if you purchase a good power supply now it is one part that can move with you far into the future on multiple different PC builds and upgrades. Its one of the reasons why I always oversize my PSU as well. Oversizing your power supply means it doesnt have to work as hard, which means it will last longer. If you decide to build another system in a few years, chances are that same power supply will be plenty of power and have plenty of life left in it to power your new system. So spend the money now on a good quality oversized power supply and you will save money later.
Yes well if you leave it too long before upgrading you find your old PSU isn't fit for purpose anymore because you need new different connectors or some other changes that necessitate you buy a new one. If you buy a PSU that's built like a tank and can easily work for 20 years without trouble, it can be obsolete in 5 years.
So than why is nobody advertising the peaks? It would make it so much simpler, not to mention safer, for everyone when choosing a PSU. If your CPU can have peaks up to 350w than let everyone know that your CPU can have peaks up to 350w and the guessing out of it.
the online calculators from companies such as be quiet and seasonic are how I always assumed most people do it, just input your components and they spit out an answer.
Exactly! They told us literally nothing about how to choose a power supply. All he wanted to do is show off his fancy equipment. The video title is a lie.
@@jublywubly Here's your easy answer: Anything 80 gold from Corsair or Seasonic 850W or more (Corsair RMe or RMx series, Seasonic Focus GX, EVGA Superniva G6) and you will have a PSU that will last 10+ years worry free
253 (Max Turbo Power) max for the CPU + 450 watt (official power draw of 4090) = 703. That is 82 % just for those two only. Yeah. That is pushing it. I'd strongly think about replacing that with a 1000 or 1200 watt psu.
Save now and be sorry later or Better to be safe than sorry? I choose the latter. I kept the PSU from my first two builds because I bought more power than I needed. I bought more power than I need for my current build because eventually I will upgrade the CPU and/or GPU and the HDD. Buying just enough power might mean you may have to get another PSU when you upgrade your components. You're not really saving any money going that route.
True... Also look into undervolting. The 4090 is kinda overtuned. And there is a lot of power optimization to be achieved with the CPU, while getting higher clock speeds
people overbuy on the power supply. With current top end hardware 850w should be fine. If you have a lot of connections & drives then 1000w will do fine.
Yea my feeling is wait on buying a high wattage psu. Once you hit 1kW it seems like there's a 100$ price premium that gets tacked on. I suspect as they start to move in higher volume with all these new high power gpus that premium will disappear. Or at least shrink considerably.
@@christopherjackson2157 buy used on ebay after reading reviews from acceptable reviewers that know what they are doing with advanced testing equipment.
@@tacticalcenter8658 just remember to check they come with all the cables lol. But you're right a quality psu should last 10-15 years of continuous use no problem.
So, for the record, he's an engineer and actually literally wrote the ATX specs and is in active communication with other vendors as to what their needs and wants and input are. You can disagree with him, but he is not "nothing but a marketing and advertising guy." Go watch our in depth interview with him on ATX if you want to understand the depth of his knowledge in this arena.
The way I do it is I overestimate the capacity just like I do with underwear size.. Yep that's right JUST LIKE UNDERWEAR. Because power supplies just like underwear must be capable of providing its main functionality when a bigger/heavier load is being used than normal. As a man you gotta understand it especially when temperatures rise.
Stephen is a lot of fun to listen to. I've really enjoyed this series with Gordn and him. Thanks for showing off some future features even if they'e early stage. Exciting stuff!
I went 850 7900xtx Hellhound Spectral white with a Ryzen 7700x. I have Water cooled CPU and 6 rgb fans and 2 m.2 SSDs. Works just fine. Draws about 500-620 from the wall while gaming at 3840x2160 ultra settings.
Finally a comment with actual relatable DATA…🎉😊
Added note .. You also have to think about what is going to be your next CPU and GPU requirements because chances are your PSU will outlast your system.
PC Partpicker gives you a ballpark figure in regards to system power draw in wattage.
@@earthtaurus5515 .. I have a tendency to overclock but the CPU and GPU overtime and when I first get it. Problem is the new CPUs and GPUs when they first become available, absolutely are not listed in any PSU calculator.
On a footnote, I think I ended up with the smallest PSU (1200W ASUS Thor) for my system and potentially the next GPU. When your GPU alone can draw a constant 600W plus transient and your CPU an easy 350W not to mention a pump, fans loaded with LEDs, etc .. I probably should have gotten a 1600W and not have to even think about it...
@@DJaquithFL the issue with 1600w is your breaker might not actually be able to handle that. on a US 15A circuit youre awful close to the limit with just the pc, add in monitor and accessories you might actually pop a breaker
@@bradhaines3142 .. RE: 1600W potentially tripping a 15A .. No argument there especially with spikes and transients.
_FYI wattage real world. Gaming on my i9-13900K, RTX 4090 and my Corsair Flex (240W brick; I haven't isolated its load) I'm not even hitting 700W at stock combined off my UPS._
Very informative video, I really enjoyed it. Apparently with these new power supplies it isn't really necessary to buy bigger just in case to avoid crashes. Of course you still need to buy a reasonable size for your use case, but at least it shouldn't crash if some component (most likely the GPU, I guess) pulls more power than expected for a few milliseconds.
I am finding that most calculators are grossly higher than what you should get, probably to cover their asses.
I ran two tests recently. One PC with an i9-9900 and an i5-6600k.
The i9 has 32gb ram, a 12gb 3060, 2 X 2tb NVME drives, a 20tb EXOS, and a blu ray drive.
The i5 machine has 3 X 1tb SATA SSDs, and a 2070 Super.
The i9 has a 650w PSU.
The i5 has a 500w PSU.
I plugged both machines into a 1000w Jackery Explorer and ran Cinebench for a max load. The Jackery has a built in wattage meter.
i5 machine peak wattage was 225w under a max load.
The i9 was 215w.
The Newegg calculator was the closest at both machines from 500-600w.
I feel comfortable with the PSUs (both Corsair).
I’ve had no issues with either machine, and the i5-6600k is being swapped for a lower power consumption i7-7700.
650 - 750w is probably the sweet spot for over provisioning while still saving some money.
I also like to over provision the wattage so that it doesn't have to work so hard. If a PSU runs at close to the rated value it'll run hotter and doesn't last as long. Also, the hotter the more noise it will produce to get the heat out of the psu.
It's good to know the power settings of PL2 is an average, it can spike up (far) above that. A good power supply should be able to take short duration spikes though. So I'm not sure this feedback feature is going to be that useful. Only scenario I can think of is accidentally putting a 4090 or more power hungry GPU in a system with a small PSU that can't handle. Well like that's ever going to happen, right?
Another use case would be if the PSU is getting old and the components like electrolytic capacitors, especially the high voltage ones may have worn out and spikes are getting harder to cover. The PSU would last a bit longer if the CPU scales back at that point, also indicating that it's time for a replacement. A soft failure is always better than a hard failure.
But both are pretty niche usecases. I'm sure system builders will be able to push the price points further down at the cost of quality components. I'm not sure if that's a good trend.
I just bought a Seasonic ATX 3.0 Titanium 1300 watt, hopefully, the last one I need for a long time after several wattage upgrades. The increasing power requirements became tiresome.
This video answered a question that I had on my current 3900X/5700XT system because I suffered a black screen with my Seasonic 850 watt PSU running transcoding software that utilized my 5700XT. My next system will allow for spikes and use a more efficient GPU... such as Battlemage.
The hardest part is finding a reputable small PSU for a low power system where you care about efficiency (eg for a low power server or iGPU build)
Q: Why is every reputable retail ATX/SFX low wattage PSU bronze/white, but you can get stuff like that in micoatx and flexatx form factors
I bought the sfx_l rog loki 850w platinum for my 4070ti and 13600 k the thing is that its in an atx build did i make any sort of mistake there? Does that make the psu unreliable?
I’m interested in the efficiency, zone and noise at load
Its easy 55-80% power suply usage for the best and most efficient result, you can see this on 80 plus the best result is when the powersuply is over 50% load and under 85%, this does not mean that a good powersuply will give you problems with your system, it just mean you get the most money out of the powersuply
How to mesure the usage of your psu ? The Most easyest way IS to use bequet Homepage because your Motherboard/SSD/RGB/Fans and so on will use Power from the psu too and this can get Up depend in how much and powerhungry Things you use beside of the CPU and gpu
This year in particular, I don't think that I've seen as much stupidity in the PSU market. No availability of ATX 3.0 PSUs and LMAO none of the PSU companies had a working calculator for the current CPUs and GPUs until a month after launch. Brilliant! Absolutely brilliant!!!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 5-star in Duh!
LabView system!
Cool, first time I see being used outside of a school.
I never knew till now that a 13700K CPU can draw up to 300w from the PSU. I had looked at the specs that tell me it is 125w and assumed that was what it drew. I learned something new.
I would be fine with a 850w PSU with a B760 mATX board, a 13700k and a 3060TI GPU, yes? Or should I go 1000w? Or even 1200w?
Yes, 850 watt is fine: the 3060ti draws about 200 watts.
The 13700k runs weird. It has random e-core load surges while on idle. Even when I updated my Asus z790 Hero bios, it felt like it got worst. I don't even overclock or mess with wattage.
I'm not sure if it's an Asus motherboard issue but my 13700k has random power spikes and core spikes.
CPU manufacturers and GPU manufacturers better start backing down on power requirements. It is totally crazy, up to 1000 W for these components, I don't like Apple but for under 100W you can buy a pretty good machine.
That's because new CPUs and GPUs are basically running at a default setting like a heavily overclocked system 10-15 years ago - undervolting and lowering the power limits can save a lot of power for few % of performance but also lower the temps and noise...
@@veduci22 Also they've up their power requirements, cpus up to 250 W and GPUs up to 600W, this is crazy!
I think this episode kinda backfired because it adds to the FUD around PSU's and creates a lot of uncertainty about how much power a CPU uses, (except the one particular CPU) and voltage spikes featured in the video.
I can help you out Gordon. Buy yourself a small form factor case and everything you can fit in it will be fine with a 650 PSU.
Seasonics new atx 3.0 coming out later this month are cheap. 280 for 1200w and the prices drop from there.
Very well done, thank you.
This was quite an informative video.
I want to hear more about efficiency.
I wish you could test with a 1000w psu to see the max spikes for 13700k and 4090
21:07 Big brain move 😮
also wondering if geek bench scores is low due to cpu sacrificing its performance for it to not shutdown, is there anyway to inform users that the system power is high and 12vo is limiting cpu power and show the users like windows notifications?? or else like intel software in the background? cause shuttingdown because of power insufficient of psu is a big slap message to user but 12vo unless youve run geekbench you can see the effects of throttling cpu power for staying a system alive and not to shutdown.
There's an MSR with bits that get set for each throttling reason (power limit, temperature limit, external signal from VRM overheating, etc). I can't say for sure without looking up the manual, but they've probably assigned a bit for I_PSU% throttling. Microsoft (or Intel in their platform driver?) would need to make a service to check those bits and raise a desktop notification.
will this help with overall effishanty power to watt ratio
The efficiency of the PSU is calculated based on its load, meaning that it will be, let's say, 90% efficient at a certain load and less efficient at different loads.
If I size the PSU thinking at the spikes, there is the risk to pick a PSU way more powerful compared to what will be the average everyday load. As a result, wouldn't this PSU be less efficient compared to a less powerful one?
If this is the case, what is the point to pick a 80 plus gold PSU then? The only advantage would be given by the quality of the components, like for example the ability for the higher tier PSU to work at an operative temperature of 50°C instead of the usual 30°C or 40°C offered by cheap models.
I'd rather size the PSU thinking at the TDP of the components, leave me a 100W margin over the estimated full system power consumption at full load, undervolt both the cpu and the gpu, and don't do rendering with both of them at the same time. Seems more reasonable, or not?
750w fits most systems, but if you have the money, do a lot of research and it may be worthwhile to buy the biggest baddest and most reliable 1200w psu that will last you until the end of times
i did basically that and got a bequiet straight power 11 1200w. 6x8 pin PCIE ( i could run a second 7900 xtx lul) and German quality
Whats that motherboard? Is a diagnostic tool or some server board I'm unfamiliar with?
It's some internal motherboard platform Intel has. secret BIOS stuff and everything.
@@FakeGordonMahUnglol cool. I kinda figured :)
I couldn't help but giggle a bit over the use of Geek Bench by an Intel guy. I just started imagining every other benchmark is banned by corporate. LOL
OT: Just swapped a broken PSU against a new one. Sthing I can do with the broken one, even perhaps fixing it?
Of course you DON'T
We kind of already knew 13 gen Intel can use a lot of power. This is the new normal vibes for 25 min. I almost fell for it... for like 5 min.
Except 12600k, many AMD, eco modes and voltage limiting, etc exist. RTX 4090 kind of requires super CPU. But that's niche and only 99% true.
As for ATX12VO I look forward to it. I have no cables besides 12V CPU, GPU and MB in my system. All my drives are NVME for a few years already. And that fat old 24pin MB cable looks (and is) stupid here in 2022. Unfortunately for now there are just a handful of power supplies and even less MB with 12VO afaik.
I won't be sizing up any power supply until ATX12vo comes out. Energy efficiency is no.1
Thanks for review.
This is how I pick my PSUs:
1) I buy a top-end PSU rated for 1000W. (like my OCZ Z1000M & EVGA 1000 G2 Supernova)
2) I never worry about it again.
The title is entirely misleading. This video doesn't tell us how to pick a power supply wattage at all. There's no information of how to choose a power supply. The video only demonstrates how manufacturers and technicians can use multi thousand dollar equipment to calculate how much power a computer would draw. That's completely useless to the rest of us.
Really seems like you skipped the first 8 minutes or so
300w cpu 300w gpu on avg, 100w on board on avg. 750w power supply recommended. Literally verbatim from the video what did you watch
The most annoying connector in the PC world (no pun intended) is not the CPU, not the GPU, but the infamous 24pin monster. Please Intel do something about, now that even a 600W GPU can work with a small 12+4 connector, why we still need such a giant 24pin oversized connector from the Jurassic, for just 100W typical max power used by motherboard (as the CPU has its own power). The 24pin connector could be much much smaller!
What's the problem with the connector? Does it annoy you optically? You just plug it in one time - it could be double the size and I wouldn't care. 🤷🏼♂️
@@jelly.1899Obviously you never tried to design a mini pc so you don't care. But for me it is a hobby, so I care.
The problem with a 24+8 (32) pin connectors are not the connectors, but the fact that they force you to route 32 cables trough your case up to PSU, and if the case is small they take a lot of space, block airflow, and made several parts difficult to access. And that is because a legacy design from the 90's, totally unnecessary nowadays. Today we can have high gauge in very thin affordable cables that were not available in the 90's. As an example the new 12VHPWR standard can carry up to 3 times the power of those 32 pin, and it does so using a connector that is 4 times smaller in size and only use 8pins for power and ground plus 4 control pins.
All other areas are improving, in fact there are laptops over 250W that only need a small barrrell, and in the smartphone arena the USB-C can carry up to 240W. But the Jurassic 24+8 pin connectors are still blocking SFFPC advances.
@@javiej I agree, in a mini build it seems like a annoyance.
Dont cheap out on your power supply. The power supply is an overlooked part of PC building because quite frankly its a boring piece of hardware, but if you purchase a good power supply now it is one part that can move with you far into the future on multiple different PC builds and upgrades. Its one of the reasons why I always oversize my PSU as well. Oversizing your power supply means it doesnt have to work as hard, which means it will last longer. If you decide to build another system in a few years, chances are that same power supply will be plenty of power and have plenty of life left in it to power your new system. So spend the money now on a good quality oversized power supply and you will save money later.
Yes well if you leave it too long before upgrading you find your old PSU isn't fit for purpose anymore because you need new different connectors or some other changes that necessitate you buy a new one. If you buy a PSU that's built like a tank and can easily work for 20 years without trouble, it can be obsolete in 5 years.
How about doing a similar video for AMD.
30min video for saying "get the highest wattage" oO
So than why is nobody advertising the peaks? It would make it so much simpler, not to mention safer, for everyone when choosing a PSU. If your CPU can have peaks up to 350w than let everyone know that your CPU can have peaks up to 350w and the guessing out of it.
honest/useful stats are of no interest to nvidia, amd and intel
😂😂😂 why would they? The contenders would point fingers and with the attention span of the normal customers... the honest company would be burnt.
Nice info
So if I understand Gordon right, I should buy a Seasonic VERTEX PX-1200 for my theoretical i3-8100/GTX 1650 or risk my house catching on fire???
😂
A 1200 for an i3 *wheeeeeeeeeeeze*
Huh? Did I miss something. You promised to offer an easy way to judge what kind of PSU to buy that "you don't have to think about too much". WTF?
the online calculators from companies such as be quiet and seasonic are how I always assumed most people do it, just input your components and they spit out an answer.
Exactly! They told us literally nothing about how to choose a power supply. All he wanted to do is show off his fancy equipment. The video title is a lie.
@@jublywubly Here's your easy answer: Anything 80 gold from Corsair or Seasonic 850W or more (Corsair RMe or RMx series, Seasonic Focus GX, EVGA Superniva G6) and you will have a PSU that will last 10+ years worry free
Couldnt you measure the power suppply input as a whole and have a piece of sofware installed on the system to read this and feed it back to the cpu?
My 4090 and 13900K says the 850W is barely enough.
253 (Max Turbo Power) max for the CPU + 450 watt (official power draw of 4090) = 703. That is 82 % just for those two only. Yeah. That is pushing it. I'd strongly think about replacing that with a 1000 or 1200 watt psu.
It's insane how inefficient the high end Intel CPus are... 250W max power draw lol...7800 X3D 140W max
Save now and be sorry later
or
Better to be safe than sorry?
I choose the latter. I kept the PSU from my first two builds because I bought more power than I needed. I bought more power than I need for my current build because eventually I will upgrade the CPU and/or GPU and the HDD. Buying just enough power might mean you may have to get another PSU when you upgrade your components. You're not really saving any money going that route.
I just went with the ax1600i when I built. Money is cheap.
They print money and then launder it into their pockets.
ur
Haha you don't need bigger power supplies anymore even the 4090 you can use a 750 watts
The prior GPUs would have large transient spikes. So it depends.
True... Also look into undervolting. The 4090 is kinda overtuned. And there is a lot of power optimization to be achieved with the CPU, while getting higher clock speeds
Epic
Epyc
So he came to show us how dangerous Intel CPU's are. Thanks! I'll make sure to get AMD next time 👍
people overbuy on the power supply. With current top end hardware 850w should be fine. If you have a lot of connections & drives then 1000w will do fine.
actually drives - and even leds / fans will use about 5 watt per device. Don't overestimate that.
Stephen Eastman has to be of very recent Irish ancestry! Looks extremely Irish!
With this feature, I anticipate a lot of stuttering in the future!
Rule of thumb
1000w or moar
da
This guy is nothing but a Marketing and advertising guy. Smart people are not buying 13 series and huge PSUs especially in this market.
Yea my feeling is wait on buying a high wattage psu. Once you hit 1kW it seems like there's a 100$ price premium that gets tacked on. I suspect as they start to move in higher volume with all these new high power gpus that premium will disappear. Or at least shrink considerably.
@@christopherjackson2157 buy used on ebay after reading reviews from acceptable reviewers that know what they are doing with advanced testing equipment.
@@tacticalcenter8658 just remember to check they come with all the cables lol. But you're right a quality psu should last 10-15 years of continuous use no problem.
@@christopherjackson2157 you can buy cables from the manufacturer or cablemod.
So, for the record, he's an engineer and actually literally wrote the ATX specs and is in active communication with other vendors as to what their needs and wants and input are. You can disagree with him, but he is not "nothing but a marketing and advertising guy." Go watch our in depth interview with him on ATX if you want to understand the depth of his knowledge in this arena.
The way I do it is I overestimate the capacity just like I do with underwear size..
Yep that's right JUST LIKE UNDERWEAR.
Because power supplies just like underwear must be capable of providing its main functionality when a bigger/heavier load is being used than normal.
As a man you gotta understand it especially when temperatures rise.
XXXXXL it is 🤣🤣🤣
I used an online calculator, it may have undersized it for me.
best bet is to use a couple of them to see if they agree with each other, if in doubt, go up 100W
Has anyone bought and used sunflower's psu? How good are they as a company?
Superflower? I think their supposed to be the best