@@bali8619 age is nothing but a number... But this mainly happens to people 50 and older.... Keep your loved ones close.... Always seek guardianship of a loved one before somebody else does....
It does happen at lot, but much of the film is exaggerated, and any legal system rightly called a legal system would not be one in which a power of attorney can simply be imposed on someone without their consent in such a tyrannical way.
Eiza talking about the gay relationship is 100% truth. As a gay person I want to see normalized gay relationships on the screen not anything didactic. Just my opinion.
She wasnt the anti-hero, Peter Dinglish's character was, as the audience can relate to him because his mother was put in a care home under malicious false pretenses. So his actions were justifiable in a morally ambiguous context (classic anti-hero). He wanted everything done legally and even tried to pay her off at first. Violence was his last resort (classic anti-hero). Marla's sole objective is selfish gain (classic antagonist) wanting more and more, even when others around her are getting hurt because of her selfish ambition. In the end there is a compromise where they both "win" but because she is now dead (because of another anti-hero and maybe the true protagonist of the story), who ends up reaping the benefits at the end?... Peter Dinglish's character, the anti-hero.
Spot on. She was clearly the villain. The anti-hero should've been the mom. Senior with a shady background but fights for her life because she was taken against her will by a scam artist.
There not really a lot of ambiguity in this movie.... Marla and honestly Fran are absolutely horrible people that completely destroy peoples lives just to get rich. The acting was great and I liked the movie, but I hate that there’s a narrative of “boss woman takes the world by the balls” when really she spends the film taking advantage of old people, particularly a lot of older women
That’s why it wasn’t strictly a feminist movie , it was just a movie allowing women to play a pure antagonist which is usually given to male roles. They got to unapologetically play evil without their gender coming into concern.
Moral Ambiguity? Outright nihilism is more like it. The only barely sympathetic character is the old woman whose criminal son seeks revenge. I wanted to like this movie, but it's only redeeming feature is it's style and acting performances. The substance of this wasted cinematic opportunity is bitter gall.
I’m usually all about moral ambiguity. This film was anything but ambiguous-the characters were all horrid people. It was v. painful to watch, and kept fast forwarding in hopes of that ambiguity. Didn’t find it.
@Max Roderick On the plus side, the scam is actually impossible to carry off in reality. This movie was a total fantasy and it's funny watching the director act like it's based on fact. Everything from the way the scam works to the way the Russian mob functions is total nonsense and I have no idea why people are behaving as if this is a serious critique of elder abuse when the scam in this movie could never be carried off in real life. Can you imagine having a billion dollar corporation in the age of social media whose business model is literally just kidnapping the elderly and stealing their assets? There'd be an FBI investigation inside a week
When people can gush over The Wolf of Wall Street, in which Leonardo DiCaprio's character unapologetically bends the rules, corrputs the system and enriches himself in a very stylised way with a fine chick on his side. Then why not gush over I Care A Lot in which Rosamund Pike's character unapologetically bends the rules, corrupts the system and enriches herself in a very stylised way with a fine chick on her side. I know the term "fine chick" is not necessarily flattering but I thought it was appropriate to underline my point.
I think it's because guardianship scams hit a sore spot. Financial mumbo-jumbo is harder to process than essentially kidnapping someone's parents or grandparents, stealing all their money and leaving them to die. So I think Marla Grayson is more comparable to Frank Underwood from House of Cards. They're both arrogant crooks with a total lack of moral core, gaming the system to fill their pockets and rise in society. Also, John Oliver did a segment on guardianship scams: th-cam.com/video/nG2pEffLEJo/w-d-xo.html
I think you're mistaking praise for the movie as praise for the characters. Wolf of Wall Street had a reasonable and logical progression of events, and you can observe how his hubris, selfishness and recklessness slowly (then quickly) eroded the system he had set up. Meanwhile in I Care A Lot, the movie sets you up to watch Dinklage guy and Marla go head to head and destroy each other. But then, they end up working together because of a sheer number of contrivances and strange character decisions. Then Marla dies to a character that gets like 2 minutes of screen time. And in the middle of all that, they keep throwing in gender jabs that feel very out of place when the movie is about conflict of mob boss vs scam artist, really just reminding me that I'm watching something that somebody wrote, not real people fighting for their lives.
It isn’t morally ambiguous. There’s nothing ambiguous about it, it comes right out and just says don’t expect the good guys to always win in life. I wonder how many drafts were written before they settled on this. If there is any ambiguity in the movie it isn’t moral, it’s technical. Also it continues the trope of the man hating blood thirsty lesbian. These two women were absolutely despicable, this isn’t representation it’s the continuation of harmful ideas about gay people. Yes, I was definitely mad at this movie, and to see them sit here and talk about it and giggle is as dark as the movie itself. 👎
@@dreamchaser7322 Dinklage's character gets everything he wants. And Marla has propagated her horribleness through the company she created by the time she gets killed. But this movie's so detached from reality that I don't care who it says wins, good or bad.
@@-JaggedGrace- My favorite part of the movie is that this scam is literally impossible in real life but the director claims it's based on reality. It's not reality. A stranger cannot walk into peoples' houses and randomly take all their assets.
i really love how rosamund's character has all positive qualities like hard-working, ambitious and smart but that was all overshadowed (rightfully so lol) by the fact that she used it in the worst way possible. however, at some points in the move she was also seen to be very humane and vulnerable; i really liked how it made the viewers idea of the character so uncertain. edit: reading the other comments,,,, y do old ppl hate this movie sm, idk if theyre like old but they type like it so i am going to assume
Pike was amazing! She carried the whole movie with her strong deranged character and witty lines. Lots of surprises. It's a fun and interesting movie. To those of you who are complaining it was a bad movie because the leads are bad people: that's the point. I hate her from start to finish but she really good.
Good premise, but wish they had given her some likeable characteristics. Cersei is a good example of what they could've aimed for, and would've been much more effective to see her actually starting to unravel in the second half then double down as a contrast to the whole girlboss hashtag expressions and stylised vaping shots in the first half. Feel it missed the mark and just made the whole thing infuriating to watch. Also terrifying that Eiza thinks there should be more female characters in film like that lol, isn't that kind of going against the entire point of the film (that replacing powerful hetero white men with gay women and black men is not going to change systemic oppression and inequality, sure as heck won't make female characters more "developed" in film by making them all unfeeling, sociopathic assassin types either...)
I get u but at the same time u need to have movies with horrible people in them to make them interesting and why not have them played by other people than white hetero men...however I do agree I think more likeable characteristics would be good but I don’t think you could ever fully root for Marla considering her profession so idk u would probably have to rewrite it... I would have loved to see this movie take a wolf of wall street approach too instead of the mafia but idk I’m no writer.
awfully late but wasn't the point of this movie to challenge expectations by giving "unlikeable" characteristics to the roles you'd normally want to like? what eiza means by what she said, and she has mentioned this in other interviews in the past, is that male characters can be given these sort of traits and do far worse things and still be enjoyed by the audience, and that rarely we get to see female characters be unapologetic and morally questionable in their actions without the expectation for them to feel ashamed of what they've done. the intention of this writing for marla was to create a character that is, yes, ruthless and horrible, and never once given a sob story as background for the audience to empathize with, yet interesting enough to hook the viewer and watch it to the end. if people were to see this film and immediately despise marla for her actions, reeling in the fact that she "has no redeeming qualities" and call it a bad movie, i would dare to say they've fallen for the trap of the very intentional, very specific tone this piece was written in to challenge what you think you want to see in a film. personally i think blakeson did a fantastic job at setting that tone and angle. every time i see a comment complaining about how "unlikeable" marla is (which is most of the time) i feel like so much of the intention of this film as a dark satire has flown over that person's head. do i like marla as a person? no, but i think she is absolutely fascinating as a character, and has been written so intricately and fantastically that it's hard to fully dislike her; she does terrible things and is completely devoid of shame, does not give a shit about pretty much anything - and this "unlikeable" aspect of her character is wonderfully balanced with her fierce and genuine love for fran, who grounds her and acts as her somewhat moral compass. blakeson was treading on an extremely fine line here, but i really enjoyed that this part of marla was most often shown, rather than told - you'd really have to pay attention to how she behaves around fran to notice that fran was the one thing that she truly, truly cared for, and that alone, to me, made marla more of a person than a villain in this movie. and i know this because i've done some digging, but they were careful not to include much about marla's past or her history with fran because they wanted to avoid begging for sympathy, or outright giving anyone a reason to really justify marla's character (because that would make more likeable, i suppose). anyway. sorry for this hell of a comment, my intention wasn't really to dismiss your thoughts, but i always found it interesting when all people could talk about was how bad marla was and how bad the movie was when i honestly feel that that just means blakeson did his job at creating an unconventional story, but people fail to appreciate the messages sent with. i guess i needed an outlet to express this and i apologise that it ended up being under your comment
People will happily watch fictional monsters skin their victims alive but instantly rebuke real world monsters. Yes their outreach and corruption was unrealistic however it’s hardly an unbelievable reflection of how evil people can be. Antagonist centred movies could make way for a while new scope in cinema.
@@lordofanime7540 Actually it's not bad. the acting was exelent, cinematography is good, pacing is good, and thr editing is fine. It's a good film. Anyone who see this will remember it. It's just shocking to see a protagonist this evil.
Basically, those who hate this movie just don't know what dark satire is. No question this J. Blakeson is a brilliant filmmaker - I Care a Lot had me roaring with laughter, tears in my eyes - especially in the beginning. If you don't love Marla, you have to admire her for her determination and will to survive! Her vitality reminds me a lot of Shakespeare's Richard the Third. Every performance is pitch perfect! Just superb!!
I LOVED LOVED LOVED this film. It’s a fun, shocking, outrageous watch and the actors were fantastic. Watched it for the 3rd time last night. Each time it gets better.
How did you watch the movie and like it I mean your entitle to have your opinion but honestly the movie was u realistic as hell She somehow defeat the mafia??? The mafia somehow wasn’t able to kill the girl nor the girlfriend??? She wasn’t torture or beaten or rape which should had happen to a person who had just torture the mafia boss mom She to brave and confident and I feel like this whole movie is trying to make her the hero when rlly she the villan
Great convo about a really badass movie! I found myself saying out loud as I watched, “these women are horrible”. And yet I cared about them and loved their live for each other. And there was just something so unapologetic about both women that was so appealing and sexy. 10 out of 10 for me!!
Yeah like this ex mafia guy is able to hide from his old mafia enemies yet a civilian woman is able to kidnap him and set him up with a court ordered guardianship before he even wakes up!
Scam artist turns into John Wick taking on the Russian Mob. Don't make me fucken laugh at this stupidity. If Dinklage's character was truly a bad ass mob boss, the doctor, judge, and the guy who runs the senior living facility all would've been murdered within the first half of the film.
It was a good movie. But it made alot of us open our eye. I felt bad it could happen to many senior. Taking them from their house . I care alot. Not knowing what to do. Be close to your family. This movie was made for a lot of different reasons. My opinion. 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊♥️♥️♥️♥️
@@ktom5262 1. Why didn’t the Russian Mafia blackmail the doctor to retract her recommendation. I’m pretty sure she would have taken the $300,000. 2. Why is the Russian mafia so incompetent in killing 2 untrained women 3. You expect me to believe that these broads can kidnap a mob boss? 4. Why would the mob boss go into business with that skank. 5. So after Marla was drugged with a belly full of alcohol she was able to escape and save her lover just in time. Please 6. The only redeeming character was Jennifer and she’s hardly in it at all. I could go on and on. Ridiculous
@@BeliiSpii Totally agree with this 100%. The writing got sloppy halfway through the film . The best dark comedies try to have sparse moments of self-reflection or parody themselves sufficiently for the viewer to acknowledge some concordance with reality so that one can consider their own moral decadence at some point. None of that here. It's an attempt that ultimately falls flat.
The movie is actually scary.... The sad reality is this happens more than what people think... And nobody's doing anything to stop it....
It was so disturbing omg
@@bali8619 age is nothing but a number... But this mainly happens to people 50 and older.... Keep your loved ones close.... Always seek guardianship of a loved one before somebody else does....
It happens a lot.
It does happen at lot, but much of the film is exaggerated, and any legal system rightly called a legal system would not be one in which a power of attorney can simply be imposed on someone without their consent in such a tyrannical way.
Eiza talking about the gay relationship is 100% truth. As a gay person I want to see normalized gay relationships on the screen not anything didactic. Just my opinion.
It was nice to see this relationship be nothing more than just 2 people caring for each other.
She wasnt the anti-hero, Peter Dinglish's character was, as the audience can relate to him because his mother was put in a care home under malicious false pretenses. So his actions were justifiable in a morally ambiguous context (classic anti-hero). He wanted everything done legally and even tried to pay her off at first. Violence was his last resort (classic anti-hero). Marla's sole objective is selfish gain (classic antagonist) wanting more and more, even when others around her are getting hurt because of her selfish ambition. In the end there is a compromise where they both "win" but because she is now dead (because of another anti-hero and maybe the true protagonist of the story), who ends up reaping the benefits at the end?... Peter Dinglish's character, the anti-hero.
Spot on. She was clearly the villain. The anti-hero should've been the mom. Senior with a shady background but fights for her life because she was taken against her will by a scam artist.
Real heroes wear red hats.
idk i wasn’t rooting for him, and he’s just as bad being a human trafficker and all...but that’s just how I felt.
You know, except when he’s introduced looking at pictures of kidnapped women 🤷🏻♀️
@@beccareid4816 if not worse.
This is what’s happening to Britney Spears.
Yes
Fact
There not really a lot of ambiguity in this movie.... Marla and honestly Fran are absolutely horrible people that completely destroy peoples lives just to get rich. The acting was great and I liked the movie, but I hate that there’s a narrative of “boss woman takes the world by the balls” when really she spends the film taking advantage of old people, particularly a lot of older women
So true...it's a network of disgusting people, Marla, Fran the Doctor, the Judge the facility director, just appalling
Agreed
That’s why it wasn’t strictly a feminist movie , it was just a movie allowing women to play a pure antagonist which is usually given to male roles. They got to unapologetically play evil without their gender coming into concern.
End conservatorship abuse #freebritney #timesup
I’ve wanted Rosamund in a role like this for nearly a decade now☺️
Moral Ambiguity? Outright nihilism is more like it. The only barely sympathetic character is the old woman whose criminal son seeks revenge.
I wanted to like this movie, but it's only redeeming feature is it's style and acting performances. The substance of this wasted cinematic opportunity is bitter gall.
100%. This was a waste of such great actors. I had to stop it several times because of how terrible the writing was.
I’m usually all about moral ambiguity. This film was anything but ambiguous-the characters were all horrid people. It was v. painful to watch, and kept fast forwarding in hopes of that ambiguity. Didn’t find it.
Why abbreviate the word "very"? Such a weird choice.
Rosamund is so intersitng actress, woman ..she's wonderful ..i Love her.
If you're looking for the hero skip to the last couple minutes of the film
Seriously! I was like there is a God.
For real tho. The entire group that I watched this with cheered.
She deserves way worse imo she got off too easy
@Max Roderick On the plus side, the scam is actually impossible to carry off in reality. This movie was a total fantasy and it's funny watching the director act like it's based on fact. Everything from the way the scam works to the way the Russian mob functions is total nonsense and I have no idea why people are behaving as if this is a serious critique of elder abuse when the scam in this movie could never be carried off in real life. Can you imagine having a billion dollar corporation in the age of social media whose business model is literally just kidnapping the elderly and stealing their assets? There'd be an FBI investigation inside a week
@Catharsis oh dang I didn't even know it was him. He was great in green room!
This movie made me change my passcode
Was it 11111?
When people can gush over The Wolf of Wall Street, in which Leonardo DiCaprio's character unapologetically bends the rules, corrputs the system and enriches himself in a very stylised way with a fine chick on his side. Then why not gush over I Care A Lot in which Rosamund Pike's character unapologetically bends the rules, corrupts the system and enriches herself in a very stylised way with a fine chick on her side.
I know the term "fine chick" is not necessarily flattering but I thought it was appropriate to underline my point.
I think it's because guardianship scams hit a sore spot. Financial mumbo-jumbo is harder to process than essentially kidnapping someone's parents or grandparents, stealing all their money and leaving them to die. So I think Marla Grayson is more comparable to Frank Underwood from House of Cards. They're both arrogant crooks with a total lack of moral core, gaming the system to fill their pockets and rise in society.
Also, John Oliver did a segment on guardianship scams:
th-cam.com/video/nG2pEffLEJo/w-d-xo.html
@@UniquerHandle thank you for your insight and the link! :)
Don't read the 1⭐ reviews on IMDb. Mostly people who assume that you have to root for the main character.
A round of applause. 👏👏👏👏👏👏
I think you're mistaking praise for the movie as praise for the characters. Wolf of Wall Street had a reasonable and logical progression of events, and you can observe how his hubris, selfishness and recklessness slowly (then quickly) eroded the system he had set up. Meanwhile in I Care A Lot, the movie sets you up to watch Dinklage guy and Marla go head to head and destroy each other. But then, they end up working together because of a sheer number of contrivances and strange character decisions. Then Marla dies to a character that gets like 2 minutes of screen time. And in the middle of all that, they keep throwing in gender jabs that feel very out of place when the movie is about conflict of mob boss vs scam artist, really just reminding me that I'm watching something that somebody wrote, not real people fighting for their lives.
eiza such a mexican icon
Uo
Iiui
God I love all the movie choices Rosamund takes. She is amazing!!!
@@wien3732 eh people have their opinions. Gotta deal with it.
It isn’t morally ambiguous. There’s nothing ambiguous about it, it comes right out and just says don’t expect the good guys to always win in life. I wonder how many drafts were written before they settled on this. If there is any ambiguity in the movie it isn’t moral, it’s technical. Also it continues the trope of the man hating blood thirsty lesbian. These two women were absolutely despicable, this isn’t representation it’s the continuation of harmful ideas about gay people. Yes, I was definitely mad at this movie, and to see them sit here and talk about it and giggle is as dark as the movie itself. 👎
But the movie doesnt say the bad guys win at life either. Thats why it ended the way it did.
@@dreamchaser7322 but they did win, just because she died at the end doesn’t mean she and all the others didn’t win.
@@dreamchaser7322 Dinklage's character gets everything he wants. And Marla has propagated her horribleness through the company she created by the time she gets killed. But this movie's so detached from reality that I don't care who it says wins, good or bad.
@@-JaggedGrace- My favorite part of the movie is that this scam is literally impossible in real life but the director claims it's based on reality. It's not reality. A stranger cannot walk into peoples' houses and randomly take all their assets.
i really love how rosamund's character has all positive qualities like hard-working, ambitious and smart but that was all overshadowed (rightfully so lol) by the fact that she used it in the worst way possible. however, at some points in the move she was also seen to be very humane and vulnerable; i really liked how it made the viewers idea of the character so uncertain.
edit: reading the other comments,,,, y do old ppl hate this movie sm, idk if theyre like old but they type like it so i am going to assume
Pike was amazing! She carried the whole movie with her strong deranged character and witty lines. Lots of surprises. It's a fun and interesting movie. To those of you who are complaining it was a bad movie because the leads are bad people: that's the point. I hate her from start to finish but she really good.
Good premise, but wish they had given her some likeable characteristics. Cersei is a good example of what they could've aimed for, and would've been much more effective to see her actually starting to unravel in the second half then double down as a contrast to the whole girlboss hashtag expressions and stylised vaping shots in the first half. Feel it missed the mark and just made the whole thing infuriating to watch. Also terrifying that Eiza thinks there should be more female characters in film like that lol, isn't that kind of going against the entire point of the film (that replacing powerful hetero white men with gay women and black men is not going to change systemic oppression and inequality, sure as heck won't make female characters more "developed" in film by making them all unfeeling, sociopathic assassin types either...)
I get u but at the same time u need to have movies with horrible people in them to make them interesting and why not have them played by other people than white hetero men...however I do agree I think more likeable characteristics would be good but I don’t think you could ever fully root for Marla considering her profession so idk u would probably have to rewrite it... I would have loved to see this movie take a wolf of wall street approach too instead of the mafia but idk I’m no writer.
awfully late but wasn't the point of this movie to challenge expectations by giving "unlikeable" characteristics to the roles you'd normally want to like? what eiza means by what she said, and she has mentioned this in other interviews in the past, is that male characters can be given these sort of traits and do far worse things and still be enjoyed by the audience, and that rarely we get to see female characters be unapologetic and morally questionable in their actions without the expectation for them to feel ashamed of what they've done. the intention of this writing for marla was to create a character that is, yes, ruthless and horrible, and never once given a sob story as background for the audience to empathize with, yet interesting enough to hook the viewer and watch it to the end. if people were to see this film and immediately despise marla for her actions, reeling in the fact that she "has no redeeming qualities" and call it a bad movie, i would dare to say they've fallen for the trap of the very intentional, very specific tone this piece was written in to challenge what you think you want to see in a film.
personally i think blakeson did a fantastic job at setting that tone and angle. every time i see a comment complaining about how "unlikeable" marla is (which is most of the time) i feel like so much of the intention of this film as a dark satire has flown over that person's head. do i like marla as a person? no, but i think she is absolutely fascinating as a character, and has been written so intricately and fantastically that it's hard to fully dislike her; she does terrible things and is completely devoid of shame, does not give a shit about pretty much anything - and this "unlikeable" aspect of her character is wonderfully balanced with her fierce and genuine love for fran, who grounds her and acts as her somewhat moral compass. blakeson was treading on an extremely fine line here, but i really enjoyed that this part of marla was most often shown, rather than told - you'd really have to pay attention to how she behaves around fran to notice that fran was the one thing that she truly, truly cared for, and that alone, to me, made marla more of a person than a villain in this movie. and i know this because i've done some digging, but they were careful not to include much about marla's past or her history with fran because they wanted to avoid begging for sympathy, or outright giving anyone a reason to really justify marla's character (because that would make more likeable, i suppose).
anyway. sorry for this hell of a comment, my intention wasn't really to dismiss your thoughts, but i always found it interesting when all people could talk about was how bad marla was and how bad the movie was when i honestly feel that that just means blakeson did his job at creating an unconventional story, but people fail to appreciate the messages sent with. i guess i needed an outlet to express this and i apologise that it ended up being under your comment
People will happily watch fictional monsters skin their victims alive but instantly rebuke real world monsters. Yes their outreach and corruption was unrealistic however it’s hardly an unbelievable reflection of how evil people can be. Antagonist centred movies could make way for a while new scope in cinema.
Evil vs evil perhaps, it could change the way we identify with the movie and thus (if the film is great enough) new concepts of the world around us.
...I don't think these people realized that this film is actually a horror movie. 🤔
It’s a bad horror movie than
@@lordofanime7540 Actually it's not bad. the acting was exelent, cinematography is good, pacing is good, and thr editing is fine. It's a good film. Anyone who see this will remember it.
It's just shocking to see a protagonist this evil.
Basically, those who hate this movie just don't know what dark satire is. No question this J. Blakeson is a brilliant filmmaker - I Care a Lot had me roaring with laughter, tears in my eyes - especially in the beginning. If you don't love Marla, you have to admire her for her determination and will to survive! Her vitality reminds me a lot of Shakespeare's Richard the Third. Every performance is pitch perfect! Just superb!!
Your “admiration” for Marla is the definition of “Gaslight, Gatekeep, Girlboss”.
Rosamund!
I saw the film the other day, it's sooo good. much watch
*Queen Eiza.* 💛
Rosamund 😍
Eiza González. You dye ur hair. Great movie!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
What's ambiguous about its morals? All the main characters are terrible people who should have got worse than what they did
It should have just been seen as a movie about evil playing evil.
Eiza González mi babe😍😍😍❤
Eiza ❤😍😍😍
Eiza 🥰😍
*Eiza González.* ♥
I LOVED LOVED LOVED this film. It’s a fun, shocking, outrageous watch and the actors were fantastic. Watched it for the 3rd time last night. Each time it gets better.
How did you watch the movie and like it I mean your entitle to have your opinion but honestly the movie was u realistic as hell
She somehow defeat the mafia???
The mafia somehow wasn’t able to kill the girl nor the girlfriend???
She wasn’t torture or beaten or rape which should had happen to a person who had just torture the mafia boss mom
She to brave and confident and I feel like this whole movie is trying to make her the hero when rlly she the villan
From this post I can assume you don’t watch True crime.
well prince and mj didnt have to endure this.
Great convo about a really badass movie! I found myself saying out loud as I watched, “these women are horrible”. And yet I cared about them and loved their live for each other. And there was just something so unapologetic about both women that was so appealing and sexy. 10 out of 10 for me!!
Polar opposite. I wanted to see that character lit on fire for her crimes. I cheered for the man in the red hat.
Eiza 🤩
Rosamund so Always beautyfull,ist a very good and great actress, thanks ❤️🌹👍, 🤗 from France
The dude looks like Anderson Cooper's twin.
This movie was so good, loved the ending.
Really interesting and entreating movie. Great acting too, so definitely watch it!
The worst movie i seen in years.....terrible.... seriously. A 5 year old can see the vast amount of plot holes.....sad.
Just saw the movie.
Just amazing.The entire team deserves all the accolades and acclaim.Very well done.Many thanks.
I loved the 🎥 movie. Me encantó la película.
I loved this movie!
Good acting. Not so great story. There are tons of things that don't add up. I give it ⭐⭐ no more!
Yeah like this ex mafia guy is able to hide from his old mafia enemies yet a civilian woman is able to kidnap him and set him up with a court ordered guardianship before he even wakes up!
The interviewer is "sick", what a poor representation of his organization he works for.
Scam artist turns into John Wick taking on the Russian Mob. Don't make me fucken laugh at this stupidity. If Dinklage's character was truly a bad ass mob boss, the doctor, judge, and the guy who runs the senior living facility all would've been murdered within the first half of the film.
More like narrative incapacity
It was a good movie.
But it made alot of us open our eye. I felt bad it could happen to many senior. Taking them from their house . I care alot. Not knowing what to do. Be close to your family. This movie was made for a lot of different reasons. My opinion. 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊♥️♥️♥️♥️
Loved this movie 🎥❤
He is such a bad interviewer.
This is the worst movie of 2021. I’m surprised these people aren’t trying to forget about it. Surely they would prefer no one watches it.
Technically, it's a 2020 movie, as Rosamund Pike has a Golden Globe nod for this movie. Either way, if that's your opinion...
Hater. This movie was amazing.
Great acting but trash movie! Hated every minute of it.
What's trash about it? Because the bad guys don't get caught and bad things happen to innocent people? As if such things don't happen in real life...
Yeah, it had potential but was relentlessly dark and unrealistic.
Gone Girl is a far better film.
@@ktom5262 1. Why didn’t the Russian Mafia blackmail the doctor to retract her recommendation. I’m pretty sure she would have taken the $300,000.
2. Why is the Russian mafia so incompetent in killing 2 untrained women
3. You expect me to believe that these broads can kidnap a mob boss?
4. Why would the mob boss go into business with that skank.
5. So after Marla was drugged with a belly full of alcohol she was able to escape and save her lover just in time. Please
6. The only redeeming character was Jennifer and she’s hardly in it at all. I could go on and on. Ridiculous
@@BeliiSpii Totally agree with this 100%. The writing got sloppy halfway through the film . The best dark comedies try to have sparse moments of self-reflection or parody themselves sufficiently for the viewer to acknowledge some concordance with reality so that one can consider their own moral decadence at some point.
None of that here. It's an attempt that ultimately falls flat.
Awful movie, no moral person can defend this crap.