Philosophy of Cosmology

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มี.ค. 2015

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @hifibrony
    @hifibrony 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    iMO Sean Carroll can explain high-level science better than anyone since Carl Sagan. Always a pleasure to hear him speak. Hell of a writer too.

    • @yurinator4411
      @yurinator4411 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Feynman had a similar gift.

    • @hifibrony
      @hifibrony ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely!

  • @sambarta9865
    @sambarta9865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've watched a lot of Sean's lectures and understood them to a degree, this shit right here is next level..

  • @notexactlyrocketscience
    @notexactlyrocketscience 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The information density of this finite presentation asymptotically approaches infinity.

  • @evhantheinfidel
    @evhantheinfidel 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This video is great, but the intro music makes me feel like I'm in an 80s themed temple in a Zelda game.
    Nah, I kid. I really like the content.

  • @johnb4314
    @johnb4314 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    An interesting peek at the nuts and bolts work of Theoretical Cosmology and Physics.

  • @philosophiaentis5612
    @philosophiaentis5612 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please, put English subtitles on it.

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is mind blowing - 👍

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A comprehensive assembly of the abstracted elements, in a reasonable presentation of the analysis.
    From the point of view of an Engineered structure, there exists the Mathematical possibility that all/everything in-form-ation can become aligned with probability one, all at once in "superimposed" sync, which is the zero-infinity positioned temporal superposition, (the idealized wave-package phase-locked state of resonance "before the big bang thought experiments).
    As an imaginable model, a linear/tangential or eternal-fluid functional information representation of the superimposed wave, is the singular zero-infinity, flat ground state number line, drawn in eternal, dualistic co-existence because it's a fluid uncertainty of existence oscillation in continuous creation, to +/- potentially possible eternity.
    Alignment.., cross-sectioning with the direction of the line of constant creation connection is the (Supersymmetric) Superspin picture plane of phys-chem/arrows of Time Timing cycles... It's the cause-effect property of orthogonality that is the Quantum Operator, which "collapses" to the "sum of all histories" integration of relative existence, ..to the fractal/macro-micro vanishing point of .dt, the 1-0Duration infinitesimal state of time duration timing, actual WYSIWYG connectivity, ..in which all potential possibility oscillation positioning co-exists in balance.., a theoretically perfect unitary symmetry.., thought experiment.
    It's something like applying Euler's Buckling Formula to the Universe and displaying the virtual mathematical results of this natural self-defining re-positioning calculation, as an "exploded view" in an omnidirectional-dimensional wave-package of axial-tangential In-form-ation formulae, ..in a holographic Perspective Drawing.., in this ultimate Actuality. Simple, but not too simple?
    "Every decoherent state of history has happened" because the shifting focus of continuous creation connection integration IS happening eternally, and looks like a Multiverse..

  • @tedlemoine5587
    @tedlemoine5587 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Brilliant video. Justin Biebers worst video has 50 x the views of this. Speaks volumes about where we're headed

    • @ducttape6425
      @ducttape6425 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've hypothesized that all those pop music videos have artificially padded view counts.

  • @realcygnus
    @realcygnus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    quite interesting ........some heavy duty ideas

    • @thegoat-ishere4414
      @thegoat-ishere4414 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      realcygnus yea as a laymen I am lost to no hope since the beginning 5-9 minutes.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer it when he's telling jokes.

  • @eenkjet
    @eenkjet 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If Carroll's branches also require objective spacetime geometry, don't they also "block" (as in block time)? Each new universe would be created AS a start to finish timescape complete, right? That's not an evolution.

  • @wordprocessbrian4497
    @wordprocessbrian4497 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Philosophy can explain why there are sides of a three dimensional thing that the observer cannot measure directly. Cosmology explains how a three dimensional thing is when it is observed, regardless of whether it is direct observation or not.

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      word process brian Fluid theory (Reproduction/Feed/Reasoning) decanted selfmultidimentionalover...
      The polydynamics of the movement generates pseudo-autonomy as material property, of the autogenous phenomenon; existing.(...)
      Simultaneous as my unidimensional variability...
      unidimensional variability = live-beings

    • @grantofat6438
      @grantofat6438 ปีที่แล้ว

      Philosophy can't explain anything, it can only speculate.

  • @J0eCh0p
    @J0eCh0p 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how come he is wearing his denim shirt inside out?

    • @FobbitMike
      @FobbitMike 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      J0eCh0p He is undergoing a denim fluctuation in a Levi space. 😀

    • @iamnotevenanumber3312
      @iamnotevenanumber3312 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because he can!

  • @kostasioannou866
    @kostasioannou866 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is no dilema here as to what happens in an anticipated stationary state. Since, as far as we know Λ is greater than 0, the universe must be currently asymptotically approaching a stationary de Sitter state. Sean says that if we wait long enough we will reach that stationary state, but that will never happen, by definition, no matter how close we get to it.

    • @dedskin1
      @dedskin1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kostas Ioannou "universe must be currently asymptotically approaching a stationary de Sitter state." You essentially say universe is getting colder and it will keep on getting colder with higher entropy to infinity... and you heard that from these kind of ppl. yet you go outside and sometimes its too hot . Now what is the chance that in infinitely cold going universe you happen to be born at the exact time and place where its so god damn hot you need a climate control unit and a good shadow. Its just not the case no matter what , what happened is you believing in their nonsense rather then your senses .

    • @kostasioannou866
      @kostasioannou866 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Pavle Pavlovic The universe is not going to become infinitely cold. It is going to come infinitely close to absolute zero but it will never get there. The probability that I'm living in this universe, which is pretty cold even now, is minimal but not zero. That probability will become even smaller in the future but it will never be zero. I do believe in my senses to the extent that I know they describe reality, otherwise I listen to other people and critically evaluate their arguments. if I didn't have that understanding I wouldn't be watching such technical lectures.

    • @dedskin1
      @dedskin1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kostas Ioannou You didnt sit down and made it up , you head it from someone . Its actuality someone else talking not you. If i can make any difference , i would like to point that out . If i may

    • @paxdriver
      @paxdriver 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      True but you're both over thinking it lol. Think finite energy density of 0 temperature which is stationary by definition, which can't be fluctuating because that would make them time dependent and not stationary, which is a contrafiction... As I understand it anyway

    • @dedskin1
      @dedskin1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kris Driver there is nothing to understand , o temperature means 0 movement , o movement means 0 energy, 0 energy means nothing , so basically there is nothing to understand . :) also 0 doesn't exist , its the biggest reason why above mention things have no basis in reality because 0 is not a real number. Ask me im very smart

  • @dedskin1
    @dedskin1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is not Philosophy nor cosmology , nor philosophy of cosmology...its simple quantum mechanics

    • @PetraKann
      @PetraKann 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Pavle Pavlovic You should apologise to Sean and his family

    • @dedskin1
      @dedskin1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Peter Kan He should apologize to kids to whom he preaches that there is no God . Why doesnt he preach to kids that there is no Devil also

    • @alysonh9327
      @alysonh9327 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Pavle Pavlovic presumably your alleged god created the devil, therefore no god = no devil

    • @dedskin1
      @dedskin1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alyson H Say it if you mean it. Be done with it ." I " your name " do not believe in god ,and i think devil does not exist ,my creator and destroyer is big bang " I wont judge you , but i cant grantee that for others

  • @michaelsmith6420
    @michaelsmith6420 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Carroll has to resort to philosophy because of his misuse of analytical math. Sean and his buddies botched the job in 1998 and continue on their merry, ignorant ventures.

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Michael Smith Fluid theory (Reproduction/Feed/Reasoning) decanted selfmultidimentionalover...
      The polydynamics of the movement generates pseudo-autonomy as material property, of the autogenous phenomenon; existing.(...)
      Simultaneous as my unidimensional variability...
      unidimensional variability = live-beings

    • @Phobos_Anomaly
      @Phobos_Anomaly 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I can't wait to read your peer reviewed research.

  • @hugoise367
    @hugoise367 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Boring.....

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hugo Ise cool commentary, very refreshing...🖖😄Fluid theory (Reproduction/Feed/Reasoning) decanted selfmultidimentionalover...
      The polydynamics of the movement generates pseudo-autonomy as material property, of the autogenous phenomenon; existing.(...)
      Simultaneous as my unidimensional variability...
      unidimensional variability = live-beings