Hawker Sea Fury - Power of the Centaurus

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • This aircraft (construction number 37539) was produced by Hawker's as a Fury ISS (Iraqi Single Seat) for the Iraqi Air Force, as part of contract number 53/1/012 for 60 aircraft, and was numbered 315 within this production batch.
    The aircraft was recovered to Orlando, Florida, USA from Iraq in 1979 by Ed Jurist and David C Tallichet. In 1989 the aircraft passed to W.R. Laws/Coleman Warbird Museum, Coleman,Texas where it was rebuilt to airworthy condition, before flying again in April 1991, registered as N36SF.
    The Fury was then shipped to the UK in September 1991, passing into the ownership of John Bradshaw at Wroughton until 2009.
    During this time the aircraft flew in the hybrid markings of a Dutch Navy and latterly Royal Australian Navy aircraft marked as 361 and
    on the UK Civil Register as G-CBEL.
    She was then exported to Australia where it was registered as VH-SFW.
    Recently imported back into the UK by her new owners, Anglia Aircraft Restorations Ltd, she has been re registered again as G-CBEL.
    The aircraft has been refurbished and repainted, by Air Leasing Ltd, in the colours of one of Hawker's Sea Fury prototypes coded SR661, which was a modified Fury Mk.II with a tail hook fitted, but without the folding wings included on subsequent production Sea Fury's.
    The aircraft is now registered to Fighter Aviation Engineering, which is a 'sister' company of Anglia Aircraft Restorations. It's operated by Air Leasing, based at Sywell and IWM Duxford.
    History:
    Delivered to Iraqi AF as 315, 19??.
    Ed Jurist & David C. Tallichet, Orlando, FL, 1979.
    - Registered as N36SF.
    - Recovered from Iraq.
    - Stored dismantled in Orlando, FL.
    Ed Jurist/Vintage Aircraft International, Nyack, NY, August 1979-1988.
    - Restored to airworthy, Coleman, TX.
    - First flight, April 1991.
    -
    This Video and Audio content is
    Copyright © StephenKeeler (HightFlight/SkyHighFlightTV) All Rights Reserved

ความคิดเห็น • 513

  • @HighFlight
    @HighFlight  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For more like this SUBSCRIBE to the High Flight TH-cam channel: ►@UCB1nbUe1En1XqMsReprAmDQ
    and then please remember to Press the little bell (above right) to enable NOTIFICATIONS so you don’t miss the latest High Flight videos.

  • @adriftonthelot4692
    @adriftonthelot4692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    An old man now, I used to work on the Centaurus when I was an apprentice at Patchway, Bristol. Best days of my life !

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Wonderful. I bet if they put you in front of a Centaurus now and said ‘fix that’, you’d do it in no time, provided that you had the right tools?

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Ps. ‘Old’ is just another word for experience and wisdom!

    • @adriftonthelot4692
      @adriftonthelot4692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@HighFlight with my eyes closed. Let me loose on a hercules too.

    • @adriftonthelot4692
      @adriftonthelot4692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      ...also got my hands dirty on the Merlin, Gyron junior, orpheus, Olympus, sapphire, M45, pegasus, nimbus, proteus, viper and and and

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@adriftonthelot4692 Without which none of the RAF aircraft of the 40s, 50s and 60s could possibly have flown - a legacy of experience to be proud of.

  • @martinbayliss3868
    @martinbayliss3868 3 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    The zenith of piston aircraft fighter design! That engine - the zenith of the internal combustion! Perfection!

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      martinbayliss and over engineered, complicated, maintainence hungry piece of junk why you do not see many flying today !!!

    • @robertsklenka5823
      @robertsklenka5823 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I sure would like to see the charts on parasitical HP loss sleeve valve VS push rod valve spring type .. Does the sleeve valve flow better?? Do the sleeves seal better?? Hopefully it does something better because a more complicated engine design would be difficult to find.

    • @blackpowder4016
      @blackpowder4016 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@robertsklenka5823 Sleeve valves do flow better and do not create hot spots like poppet type exhaust valves but they come at the expense of sliding and rotating sleeves inside the cylinders. They are difficult to keep lubricated and the sleeves and the complicated gear train needed to operate them add weight to the engine.

  • @maastomunkki
    @maastomunkki 6 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    While the Spitfire is a no doubt one of the most beautiful planes ever to exist, there is some kind of brutal honesty in the Hawker designs, that really appeals to my taste. Nice video and thank you so much for not ruining it with music! (:

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thankyou. I agree with you too regarding the Spitfire, Hawkers and the music, which is of course provided by the sound of that massive Bristol Centaurus!

    • @theguitaraholic3951
      @theguitaraholic3951 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The elliptical wing shape had to borrowed from the Spitfire.

    • @Simon_Nonymous
      @Simon_Nonymous ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@theguitaraholic3951 I wondered too if that distinctive trailing edge was borrowed from the Spitfire, along with bits of the Fw 190; maybe Tank, Mitchell and Camm are all in aviator's heaven now arguing who the father of the baby was :-)

    • @mikeclarke641
      @mikeclarke641 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was lucky enough to see a Sea Fury displayed by Robbie Booth at Dairy Flat New Zealand in the mid nineties. Allways stuck in my mind. He displayed it very well. Making the most of its vertical performance. Had the Centaurus at the time. Amazing sound. Apparently most have been repowered by R2800's due to lack of sleeves. Sad.

    • @Ord_Wingate
      @Ord_Wingate ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hawker made some incredible aircraft, and everyone although over shadowed by the Spitfire you cannot get past the superb Hurricane, Typhoon, Tempest and Fury. Each one was more than enough to hold its own as fighters, fighter bombers and just bloody brilliant planes

  • @billfarley9167
    @billfarley9167 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I spent 10 years in Canadian naval aviation back in the 1950's. We had about 40 operational Sea furies at the time. Hell of an aircraft. Would give the Corsair and F8F a run for their money.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      BOTH families of planes are fantastic, and complemented each other brilliantly. Safe to say North Korea still gets nightmares every time one of them takes to the sky.

    • @danstone8783
      @danstone8783 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I gotta suggest combat between them to the guys who do that rt of thing on you tube.

    • @cob1965
      @cob1965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sea Fury and Corsair, both fantastic!

    • @kidjr-ls9xn
      @kidjr-ls9xn ปีที่แล้ว +2

      P51

    • @douglasmiller8607
      @douglasmiller8607 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why didn't the British swap engines on the lend-lease Corsair. If they got the airframes without engines,it would've simplified maintenance.

  • @TheClareybrown61170
    @TheClareybrown61170 5 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Always a pleasure to hear a Centaurus ! LONG LIVE THE SEA FURY!!!!!!

  • @timdixon928
    @timdixon928 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    May 1944 My father was posted to the Centaurus Flight at RAF Filton as an RAF Test Pilot responsible for the development of the new Centaurus engine flying many, Centaurus engined, aircraft.

  • @davidcraig9938
    @davidcraig9938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    The Sea Fury and the F8f Bearcat, those were to the top props in fighters, hands down...last generation before the jets.

    • @gazza2933
      @gazza2933 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Spitfire Mk24??

    • @dillianwhyte443
      @dillianwhyte443 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gazza2933 nah warthunder has it wrong

    • @scottcurlis4893
      @scottcurlis4893 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Totally agree. Love both planes! Hope to see a fury in person some day. For now, I can't get enough video footage of this plane. Also, ever hear the sound of a tigercat? Almost brings tears lol

    • @gruntabro1
      @gruntabro1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Seafury is the only piston engine fighter to have shot down a Mig jet fighter in Korea war

  • @chrishuffman6734
    @chrishuffman6734 5 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    I have to hand it to the Brittish. They produced some beautiful, sleek looking, aircraft. I love the looks of the Sea Fury

    • @YuriVriesema
      @YuriVriesema 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Fastest military ordered piston engined plane ever..

    • @mrloominati3097
      @mrloominati3097 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@YuriVriesema You'd probably be correct regarding production fighters that saw operational use, however, there is another Hawker design worth noting that not many people aren't aware of.
      In 44' the British air ministry and, Hawker likewise, experimented with various exotic engine layouts and powertrains etc, and one of those is what I'd consider the final iteration of the Tempest. It's called the Tempest LA610 (a prototype displayed at Radlett's annual SBAC airshow). This version of the Tempest boasted a 3500hp Napier Sabre 7 powertrain. It's said it was capable of 485mph, or 780ish kph. I'd assume in favourable conditions on War Emergency Power this could have exceeded 800kph, especially considering the superior aerodynamics compared to the Sea Fury as this was not a radial. It was also in the ministties interests not to destroy limited test prototypes as there were only 2 built, so I assume this airframe was never pushed beyond what it was truly capable, however that can always be said for any aircraft.
      It would be awesome if I could dig out some pilots notes, however, I couldn't find anything legit, so we'll just have to take those numbers with a pinch of salt.
      I'd say other notable mentions could include the German Dornier 335, the H model 51 stang, the Bearcat, probably the late mk 20 Spitfires and Seafire Fr 47 alike. I'd probably also say the Tempest mk II which bears an uncanny resemblance to the Sea Fury, although it was developed in conjunction with the Fury where many of the primary components are the same.
      Either way, I'd say most late war piston fighters could all reach into that magic 700+ pocket.

    • @dereksturman6237
      @dereksturman6237 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@YuriVriesema I think the fastest production piston engined aircraft was the De Havilland Hornet

    • @gmol6447
      @gmol6447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mr Loominati
      H

    • @davidmarshall1259
      @davidmarshall1259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you.

  • @chriswilson2431
    @chriswilson2431 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    The Bristol sleeve valve engines weren’t called “whispering death” for nothing!

  • @thethirdman225
    @thethirdman225 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That engine and prop combination sound beats all comers. There's nothing like a Sea Fury with a Centaurus and a 5 blade prop doing a high speed pass.

  • @stuartwillardscreenworx4035
    @stuartwillardscreenworx4035 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Always brings tears to my eyes the Fury was one of the greats, just a year late to have made the impact it truly deserved..

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A beautiful and powerful aircraft. We are fortunate to be able to still see many flying.

  • @okrajoe
    @okrajoe ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Both looking and sounding great. What a classic warbird!

  • @posniknelb6114
    @posniknelb6114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is hands down the most impressive piston engined fighter plane ever,superb and incredible.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Certainly it is, of those that made it into production. If only the Martin Baker MB5 had done so, but sadly not!

    • @posniknelb6114
      @posniknelb6114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sadly many great designs never made it into production.The problem is usually cost, complete lack of foresight and the wrong people making wrong decisions as well as time moving on.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@posniknelb6114 So true. I think in the case of the MB5 it was the end of WW2 and the appearance of the Jet engine, which also resulted in the Fury/Sea Fury being one of the last piston engine prop driven fighter aircraft.

    • @posniknelb6114
      @posniknelb6114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The ww2 era piston engined fighters and bombers will always be my favourites.I would take a spitfire over a eurofighter typhoon any day of the week.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@posniknelb6114 Agreed, but maybe I'd take a Hawker Typhoon over a Spitfire?

  • @thedude1-wn2ij
    @thedude1-wn2ij 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What a beautiful deadly beast, born in an era when it was essential.
    That landing was beyond textbook 🫡

  • @badrobot2765
    @badrobot2765 7 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Thats got to be the best landing i have ever seen, good job

  • @icewaterslim7260
    @icewaterslim7260 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The real sleeve valve deal . . . Luv it . Luv it . Luv it. Loud and badass like no Wright R 3350 sounds. Thanks for posting.

  • @cliverockability3829
    @cliverockability3829 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Watching this reminds me of my late father taking me to airshows and telling young me about this being the ultimate piston engined fighter.....

  • @greensocks4507
    @greensocks4507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I live in Centaurus road. Renamed in the early '50's evidently by someone who used to like planes. True story. It used to be Port Hills Road.

    • @timj41
      @timj41 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi there from Templeton

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My interest was piqued by this, so I did a little research. Christchurch Library have a record that says how Centaurus Road came to be so named. It was named in February 1938 after the Imperial Airways flying-boat 'Centaurus' which made it's first visit to South Island, New Zealand at Lyttelton in January 1938. Here's a link to the record - christchurchcitylibraries.com/Heritage/PlaceNames/ChristchurchStreetNames-C.pdf
      and a link to a newspaper report of the time about the renaming of the road - paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19380226.2.88?end_date=26-02-1938&items_per_page=10&phrase=2&query=Centaurus+&snippet=true&start_date=26-02-1938
      and also a link to an online article about the event itself - lostchristchurch.wordpress.com/2016/11/11/a-great-pilgrimage-over-the-clouds/

  • @stevetheduck1425
    @stevetheduck1425 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A fun time can be had looking up the family of Hawker aircraft from the 1930s biplanes, such as the Hawker Demon, Hector, and several others, the smaller biplane fighters that derieved from them, the Hawker Nimrod and Fury, the Fury II and High-Speed Fury. This designwas completely revised as the monoplane Hurricane, which had two 'sister' designs in the Hawker Henley and Hotspur, a turret-fighter, popular at the time.
    The Hurricane was to be replaced by a modernised Typhoon,
    the Tornado had a number of prototypes with various engines,
    which resulted in two parallel designs the Fury and the Tempest.
    The Sea Fury, Tempest II and V all went into service,
    then the Hawk and Sea Hawk jets replaced the whole series, eventually going through a number of prototypes where the swept wing was introduced, resulting in the Hawker Hunter, a major international success.
    More modern designs of interceptors such as the Hawker P.1154 were cancelled and Hawker fell into the mess of the Government's hatred of having more than one designer and builder, from which we have yet to recover.

  • @holton345
    @holton345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Kurt Tank approves.

  • @covertops19Z
    @covertops19Z 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Probably the best sounding radial engine, noise wise. It's almost like an inline V-series liquid cooled engine.. All in all, TOTALLY BAD ASS!!...GREAT WHEEL landing also..

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Here's a recent engine run and walk around of the same aircraft - th-cam.com/video/kvkIVKaZU1Y/w-d-xo.html

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      covertops and how many are left around today ?????

  • @TheClareybrown61170
    @TheClareybrown61170 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Just the most awesome thoroughbred.Always loved these since my first Frog kit bought from a steam rally at Ardingly for 10p in 1976.Adore that Centaurus crackle on take off and the beautiful proportions of that airframe.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1976 - now, that was a good year!

    • @TheClareybrown61170
      @TheClareybrown61170 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely!

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Baz Bazdad Thanks. I didn't know that was the year that FROG folded - as you say, not so good for them!

    • @453421abcdefg12345
      @453421abcdefg12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Baz Bazdad FROG=Flies Right of the Ground.

  • @steventhornton4716
    @steventhornton4716 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    That fury sounds truly amazing 👏

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      when it will start and run !!!!

  • @jockwebb3435
    @jockwebb3435 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Saw one of these at an airshow a number of years ago. Simply breathtaking even in the company of a Spitfire and a Mustang.

    • @riazhassan6570
      @riazhassan6570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We had Furies in our air force during the early days. I don’t think Spitfires or Mustangs, even in later souped-up versions, would have matched them in raw performance. However, they pretty much represented the last gasp of piston-engined fighters

  • @MrJpsspecial
    @MrJpsspecial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    LOVE THAT ENGINE I saw the cu tout unit at Bristol air museum what a beauty that was to watch slowly rotate .

  • @peterk2455
    @peterk2455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another ex-Iraqi Fury, VH SHF 1953 Hawker Sea Fury MKII located at Archerfield, Queensland, Australia, was sold at auction today. In excellent flying condition and with AFTT 366hrs, the Centaurus had 303.16hrs, Prop 247, prob'ly lowest time of any Fury

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a beautiful looking Sea Fury in naval colours. Do you know who bought it?

  • @ginginthing
    @ginginthing 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What a beautiful beast with a fantastic pilot that can stick a wheel landing.

  • @LV_CRAZY
    @LV_CRAZY 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    An excellent piston engine aircraft in the dawn of the jet age

  • @TheKusa5
    @TheKusa5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    While I'm a tad more partial to the R-3350 and R-2800 (I'm from the U.S. I can't help it!)
    I really love the sound of the Centaurus too, wish there was more around!

  • @HiVoltish
    @HiVoltish 7 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    The Brits sure can design beautiful aircraft.

    • @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8
      @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Why would they design an Obsolete airplane though*

    • @watson946
      @watson946 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Escape for Mankind is Keith Johnson ever heard of the Douglas Skyraider?? Served with effect in Vietnam, your view is over simplified.

    • @jackthebassman1
      @jackthebassman1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why thank you, very gracious of you.

    • @techmaniac43
      @techmaniac43 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Brits were the #1 in design I have to say. But I could not have a favorite, there are many Sexy warplanes that existed and served that is hard to choose...

    • @Jabber-ig3iw
      @Jabber-ig3iw 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Escape for Mankind is Keith Johnson tell the pilots of the migs shot down in Korea that this aircraft was obsolete. You shouldn’t let your ignorance of facts show so easily in your TH-cam comments otherwise people will assume you live under a bridge.🙄

  • @honawikeepa5813
    @honawikeepa5813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A genuine beast. Favorite plane in the world.

  • @pinkskud1
    @pinkskud1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The big red one in the background is the DHC dash 7 operated by the British Antarctic survey.

  • @gourishankar52
    @gourishankar52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think this aircraft is not in fact a Sea Fury but a rare landbased Fury. The RAF rejected the Fury, partly because it had not long taken on the somewhat similar Tempest II but mainly because jets were fast coming into the picture. The Navy, however, decided they needed one more piston engined carrier fighter and the Sea Fury served the Fleet Air Arm with distinction well into the 1950s. A small number of the landbased versions were built and sold to other nations. This aircraft was recovered from the edge of an airfield somewhere in Iraq, (Hawker workers called them 'Baghdad Furies'), restored and painted up as the original Fury prototype. Maybe there are others lurking, waiting to be lovingly restored. Let's hope...

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, you are 100% correct - Fury (ISS - Iraqi Single Seat) aka 'Baghdad Fury'. The scheme is a very appropriate link to one of the original Sea Fury prototype's that was without folding wings and would otherwise have been a Fury Mk.II had the RAF order gone ahead. 👍🙃

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is actually a land modification of the Sea Fury, the Fury did not go into production.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Yes, you're right. It does say what it is in the extended description. It was part of a batch specifically constructed by hawkers to fulfil an order from Iraq. Some aircraft were converted from Sea Fury FB.11s, whereas this one was part of a freshly manufactured batch of aircraft specifically designated 'Fury ISS (Iraqi Single Seat)'. The colours depict one of the Sea Fury prototypes that were produced along with the proposed land based RAF 'Fury' prototypes that were cancelled before the Sea Fury was ordered for the RN. The prototype represented wasn't fully navalized, similar to this Fury ISS. Of course you will know all of that as you clearly know about the Sea Fury. I find that the title 'Sea Fury' is better at attracting attention because that's what most people recognise it as or think it is when they see it. The best part is, it has a Centaurus!👍

    • @gourishankar52
      @gourishankar52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HighFlight I can see the blister behind the tail-wheel that would have carried the landing hook on the naval versions, but do the wings still fold? Hard to imagine Hawkers retaining that if they were selling them to a nation without aircraft carriers.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gourishankar52 No. the wings on this version don't fold.

  • @TheRcgordon
    @TheRcgordon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love this aircraft . Must be the best single engine piston powered aircraft ever.

  • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
    @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice seeing a de Havilland Canada Dash 7 in the background, on the ground near the start.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, that's the British Antarctic Survey's Dash 7, VP-FBO. I'm sure that I have some film of her somewhere? 😊

  • @vumba1331
    @vumba1331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Greaser landing to end a great show, thanks for sharing it.

  • @snuffle2269
    @snuffle2269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    For all you "tail draggers", that is how to land an aircraft. No bounce at all. Whisper smooth even the baby didn't wake up.

  • @davidlawrencebanks4610
    @davidlawrencebanks4610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What a fantastic sounding beast

  • @henrys.6864
    @henrys.6864 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "Sleeve Valve" engine sound so much "throatyer" than the traditional overhead valve engine! 👍
    What genius engineering back then! 🇬🇧
    👍🇺🇲🇬🇧

  • @simonframpton2554
    @simonframpton2554 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Just hearing that engine makes the hair's on my arms stand up

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In real life they are even better. IMHO they beat the stuffing out of the Merlin (which have always found rather bland). This is a good recording of it, save for the chatterboxes in the background but the fact you can hear them gives some idea how quiet it is by comparison with other types.

    • @pilgrim....
      @pilgrim.... 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I also wished he could have straffed the trainspoters

  • @Juno58
    @Juno58 7 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Nice Video, i love the Sea Fury and the Centaurus Sound. Saw another Sea Fury at Breitscheid Airshow here in Germany, it's a real beast! I fly a small electric powered RC Model of the Fury, it flies very well! Kind regards from Germany

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thankyou. The one you saw at Breitscheid would have been this one, seen here at Duxford in 2013 - th-cam.com/video/qD06WZnJhB0/w-d-xo.html - beauty, power and grace in one. Your RC model sounds very good. Lets hope we get to see more of these beauties flying in the future - our Royal Navy Historic Flight Sea Fury trainer will be back in the air this year with a single seater to follow shortly. Best wishes from England.

    • @exb.r.buckeyeman845
      @exb.r.buckeyeman845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      To you also from Cornwall.

  • @drizler
    @drizler 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I met an old fellow back in the 90's who told me he flew those at sea back in the day. He was surprised to hear me say I'd seen one flying let alone heard of them. He said that for takeoff they started out pointed 45 degrees off the side of the ship and stood on the one brake while firewalling it. There was so much P factor on that huge prop that the technique was what it took to get it rolling straight. He said that takeoff scared hell out of him until he got used to it. Must not have had a catapult I guess.

  • @TheFunkhouser
    @TheFunkhouser 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Imagine if those badboys made it into WW2, they wouldve tore shit up! One of the fastest single piston engined fighters ever.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      As an improvement on the Hawker Tempest, which out was technically designed to replace, it would certainly have made a big mark, as it of course did during the Korean War against Mig-15 Jets. A superb aircraft.

    • @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8
      @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *America had 4,000 hp Thunderbolts with a 540 mph top speed on the drawing board, but America dropped all piston powered aircraft development immediately after WWII, because they all became instantly Obsolete*

    • @distortedreality4603
      @distortedreality4603 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Escape for Mankind is Keith Johnson Ever heard of the Douglas Skyraider ? Do your research !

    • @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8
      @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Hawker Sea Fury wasn't delivered until 1947
      The P-47N had a gross weight of over 20,000 pounds, could fly 2,300 miles, and had a top speed of over 460
      and it flew in WWII, almost 2,000 being produced

    • @devinhill2123
      @devinhill2123 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're thinking of the XP-47J, the P-47N was slower than a P-51

  • @jaygee5693
    @jaygee5693 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Reasonably good landing.

  • @Ord_Wingate
    @Ord_Wingate ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing the difference in sound to a Merlin or Griffon. The radials always sound beefy and angry...like it's spoiling for a fight

  • @joemd7775
    @joemd7775 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What a great video, thank you very much.
    I just love the Fury, just an absolute beautiful air plane.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, it was a joy to film. Yes, a lovely aeroplane - one of the great's.

  • @user-ei3dq2dw6i
    @user-ei3dq2dw6i 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You would want to be the enemy hearing that sound coming towards you truly frightening

  • @crosseyedone7960
    @crosseyedone7960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seemingly effortless from take off to landing. Wonderful!

  • @postwar46
    @postwar46 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This plane was the criterion of the series : it was putting out almost 2,500 HP . A lot of power placed in the hands of well trained dedicate pilots.

  • @alanmabey2144
    @alanmabey2144 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Goodness me,she is a different beast with her proper engine.Thanks for posting,a fantastic sound a lot better than the Wright engined restored versions

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks. Glad you like it. That sound and the aircraft is something extra special!👍

  • @sirnurtle657
    @sirnurtle657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In the first age, in the first battle, when the shadows first lengthened, one stood. Burned by the embers of World War 2, his airframe blistered by the flak of the Luftwaffe and tainted beyond ascension, he chose the path of perpetual torment. In his ravenous hatred he found no peace; and with boiling blood he scoured the Korean Peninsula seeking vengeance against the dark lords who had wronged him. He wore the crown of NATO, and those that tasted the bite of his Hispanos named him...
    *The Mig Slayer*

  • @richardsilva-spokane3436
    @richardsilva-spokane3436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fourth video tonight watching the Fury. What a majestic beast!!! And its engine acoustics rival the in-line Merlin!!!! Cheers from a Swindon born Yank 👍👍👍👍

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks and I'm pleased that you enjoyed the film. 🙃👍

  • @manfredbeuth2921
    @manfredbeuth2921 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Super amazing warbird!!!!!

  • @dhtmo
    @dhtmo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Absolute beast of an aircraft!

  • @albertschultz7151
    @albertschultz7151 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful aircraft. Superbly engineered.

  • @lyedavide
    @lyedavide 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a beautiful machine with an awesome engine!

  • @anthonyskellern5970
    @anthonyskellern5970 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent footage of a terrific aeroplane! Fantastic engine sound and a muscular display... Love it!

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. It was a joy to film and watch. Hopefully see more this year as she's now based at Duxford.

  • @geoffdearth8575
    @geoffdearth8575 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's probably the best example of a propeller-driven airplane. And beautiful into the bargain.

    • @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8
      @Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Actually it was a useless airplane, which is why so few were made*

    • @geoffdearth8575
      @geoffdearth8575 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Perhaps useless in its time but still beautiful.

    • @steveshailer9062
      @steveshailer9062 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ''Escape for Mankind is Keith Johnson''............ You sound just like some other ''troll'' by the name of ''soaring tractor'' or is it ''boring factor?'' ...aka Wilbur Finnigan. Who's only seeming aim in life is to poison everything ''British'' on here.

    • @tsu8003
      @tsu8003 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Escape is just a troll. If we just ignore him he may go back under his bridge and go back to sniffing his modelling glue!

    • @cmadden3364
      @cmadden3364 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 the only useless person in the world is you 🤡

  • @alanclifford1337
    @alanclifford1337 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Following the terrific Tempest, this 'Hawker Spitfire' would have decimated the opposition had WWII lasted longer. I am a former student apprentice at RAE Farnborough.

  • @mattblack9069
    @mattblack9069 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Damn good camera work of a beautiful air craft English style.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it and hopefully there will be more just as soon as we can all get out of 'lockdown'?😊👍

  • @number1genoa
    @number1genoa ปีที่แล้ว

    There was a Centaurus powered Sea Fury in New Zealand for a few years, it was a privilege to see it displayed at airshows the Centaurus seemed a smooth an quiet engine compared to a poppet valve motors. I had a friend in the RNZAF who worked on the Bristol Hercules also a sleeve valve engine which were used on the Bristol Freighters. He said when one of the sleeve drive mechanisms failed it was absolute carnage for the engine.

    • @jimattrill8933
      @jimattrill8933 ปีที่แล้ว

      I worked on Hercules engines - no valves to adjust! We never had a sleeve drive mechanism fail. This was in 1968-9. The exhaust was complicated and difficult to repair.

  • @nervo6321
    @nervo6321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That is one beast of an engine...

  • @exb.r.buckeyeman845
    @exb.r.buckeyeman845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No valves in the heads, the liners twist and go up and down to reveal ports, a bit like a 2 stroke engine.

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And the power generating bit of the cylinder goes all the way out to the cowling, no overhead valves and rockers.

  • @CrazyTechLab
    @CrazyTechLab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you imagine being chased by one of these in combat? I don't care if you were in a Mig 15, seeing an angry Fury coming at me would scare the crap outta me.

  • @mickboakes7023
    @mickboakes7023 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Beautiful noise. Wonder what Sidney Camm would make of that.

    • @MarsFKA
      @MarsFKA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He already knew. He designed the Mark 2 Tempest with the Centaurus engine and developed the Sea Fury from that.

  • @Simonize41
    @Simonize41 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I absolutely LOVE the Sea Fury. She is stunning in both sound and performance, never mind looks. This and the P-51D - the most beautiful piston-powered aircraft ever built as far as I’m concerned. They tug my heartstrings whenever I see and hear either. Simply gorgeous!❤️

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankyou. I certainly agree with you on both counts. This Sea Fury is undoubtedly one of my all time favourites!

    • @tsu8003
      @tsu8003 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sea Fury and Corsair for me! Can't beat those radial engines! Okay, I'll give you the P-51D but only if you take the Spitfire MKXIV with the bubble canopy!

    • @stuartwillardscreenworx4035
      @stuartwillardscreenworx4035 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      So very true. Its just a shame that the Sabre powered Fury never flew out of prototype thanks to the jet age, it was Both the fastest (nearly 500mph) and arguably the most beautiful of the Furies and thats saying something in this company. I agree too about the Spit, the last of the Spitfires (Mk22/ 23/24) for me were the most stunningly beautiful of them all.

  • @freekmusbach8722
    @freekmusbach8722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    wow that sound is just awesome

  • @michaelprocter1298
    @michaelprocter1298 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've had the opportunity to sit in one at Darwin international airport and then hear her start up then beat down the main runway flat out...the sound of her Bristol Centaurus in full song. Her whistle growl was BLOODY amazzzing

  • @vecchiogufo4863
    @vecchiogufo4863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Powerful and beautiful. I love this plane.

  • @colinmiles1052
    @colinmiles1052 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful aircraft - what a sound!

  • @georgeclarke163
    @georgeclarke163 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a beautiful aircraft, that sound! From the days when Britain could build aircraft like this.
    Where did it all go wrong?

  • @PaulieLDP
    @PaulieLDP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Centaurus sounds great, so many of these have an R-2800 swap.

  • @stanbattle7436
    @stanbattle7436 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Compliments to the camera man/lady :-) Amazing work.

  • @Diogenes425
    @Diogenes425 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Beautiful aircraft!

  • @tsu8003
    @tsu8003 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a stunner! Britain at it's best!

  • @ThomasDoubting5
    @ThomasDoubting5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its one hell of aircraft . I hope that a hawker typhoon or tempest gets airworthy some day .

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hawker Tempest Mk.II MW763/G-TEMT has been restored, is also owned by the owner of this Sea Fury and is awaiting its first flight, which will hopefully be very soon and during this coming year. Typhoon RB396 is currently being rebuilt by Airframe Assemblies on the Isle of Wight, but is some years from completion.

    • @ThomasDoubting5
      @ThomasDoubting5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HighFlight thanks for the information 👍

  • @Andy-kf4rd
    @Andy-kf4rd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That centaurus is all the music you will ever need in a video.well done to the guys who brought this beauty back

  • @tonybarnes3658
    @tonybarnes3658 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just adore this magic machine. The pinnacle of piston engined fighters I reckon. Reminds me of an FW190 bulked up and on serious steroids! Well, bulked up but trim in the right areas! Is there truly any sweeter sound than a seriously big reciprocating I/C engine? I for one don't believe so. Then bolt a beautiful machine to said engine? Ahhhh sweet sweet heaven!!! Thanks for a gorgeous video

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, I'm glad that you enjoyed the film and couldn't agree more with your like of the aircraft and engine.😊

  • @firefightergoggie
    @firefightergoggie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These planes were absolute animals. Listen to the raw power.

  • @leroyholm9075
    @leroyholm9075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a Beauty!

  • @bernardthefourth
    @bernardthefourth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome plane. You don't see many with the Centaurus any longer.

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bernardtheforth they were junk engines, a maintainence nightmare !!!!

    • @bernardthefourth
      @bernardthefourth 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wilburfinnigan2142 I just like the 5 blade prop really. Makes the plane for me.

  • @FAA-DPE
    @FAA-DPE 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sea Fury is second to none, period.

  • @billysolhurok5542
    @billysolhurok5542 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was blessed to attend Oshkosh 2000
    Saw Getchel's Centaurus powered Sea Fury
    and
    Odegaard's race 57 Super Corsair.Great stuff!
    Got pictures,and a Corsair tee shirt, but the thing that has stayed with this old man,
    is the sound, the very unique sound, of these two aircraft running up,taxiing,
    and low altitude passes.
    If 100/130 and 100LL is so bad,
    why does it smell so good?
    :D

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What an amazing experience. One day I intend to get to Oshkosh...🙃👍

    • @88SC
      @88SC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where is Ellsworth Getchell’s Fury nowadays? I used to see him with it often on the West Coast in the 1980s.

    • @billysolhurok5542
      @billysolhurok5542 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@88SC He has got to be in his mid eighties at this point,if he is even still with us

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@88SC It was de-registered with the FAA in 2018, but part of his obituary of 30 Dec 2020 says - 'It was Ellsworth's desire that his worldly resources be dedicated toward the continued maintenance and operation of his Hawker Sea Fury as well as the support of promising students in aviation and the sciences. The Ellsworth Hovey Getchell Foundation was created to ensure his legacy lives on.'

    • @88SC
      @88SC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HighFlight sad to hear of his passing, but thanks for the update. Hopefully it means 105 will take to the air again, Centaurus and all. With all due care.

  • @mickgriffin1210
    @mickgriffin1210 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This aircraft is not a sea fury it`s closer to the version designed for the RAF The Hawker Fury and is a fixed wing fighter without naval equipment and fittings. Hawker Fury I
    Single-seat land-based fighter version for the Iraqi Air Force. Unofficially known as the "Baghdad Furies", 55 built.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally correct and it does say exactly what the aircraft is in the extended description. If I describe it as a Fury, Fury II or Sea Fury people say that’s wrong. If I describe it as a Fury ISS most have no idea what that is. It’s a beauty though whatever it’s called! 😊👍

  • @michaelegan6092
    @michaelegan6092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonderful aircraft flown by an equally good pilot. Look at that touchdown.But if I had the money I'd want the Sabre powered version, the ultimate piston engined fighter, in my eyes.

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hopefully there'll be a Sabre engine back in the sky in a few years time, not on a Sea Fury, but on a Hawker Typhoon as there are a couple currently being rebuilt in UK and Canada. The UK one has a zero timed Napier Sabre?

  • @jimdavis8391
    @jimdavis8391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The FW190 must have inspired the Fury to some extent, not just the radial engine but there seem to be elements of the rear fuselage and inner wings that look similar. The FW190 might have been as good as the Fury with more time.

    • @wetzel1628
      @wetzel1628 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You’re right. they actually got the nose cone and cooling fan setup from the 190 to reduce drag. Behind the large nose cone, there is a big fan in front of the cylinders that spins 3x faster than the prop itself, to improve cooling now that the nose cone is in the way. The brits learned this from a captured fw190 a3. I think this feature and the super streamlined airframe with the Centaurus is what made it so fast. Faster than American radial powered airplanes at low to medium altitude.

    • @stevetheduck1425
      @stevetheduck1425 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Hawker Tornado (parallel development to the Hawker Typhoon) is the plane before this one, individual test airframes flew with several engines to discover which was best.
      The Typhoon went into production to replace the Hawker Hurricane, but never actually replaced it.
      Parallel development meant several Hawker designs existed, of which the aforementioned and the various Tempest, Fury and Sea Fury types were built in numbers.
      The Fury and Sea Fury was a smaller airframe than the slightly later Hawker Tempest, the Mk.II version of which had a large radial as well.

  • @timmayer8723
    @timmayer8723 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a powerful monster. Has a bit of the whine of the F4U Corsair, another radial monster of the air. Love it.

    • @tsu8003
      @tsu8003 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is something majestic about a radial engine fighter!

  • @bipolatelly9806
    @bipolatelly9806 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A beautiful machine.

  • @goring19
    @goring19 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a wonderful sound. The Centaurus has a unique sound. This aircraft has the "P" in the circle on the rear fuselage denoting prototype. Interesting

    • @rosiehawtrey
      @rosiehawtrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yellow undersurface also denotes a prototype.

  • @rearea784
    @rearea784 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just by sound and looks this aircraft feels strong.

  • @baldbollocks
    @baldbollocks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It has an amazingly likeness to the FW 190

    • @mikereger1186
      @mikereger1186 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look at the wings... as to the nose and fuselage, it’s no great surprise that similar dimensions and the radial engine would present similar designs due to the aerodynamics involved. If you look at the Typhoon, Tempest and Fury the evolution is also pretty clear.

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No comparison under the skin, where it matters.

    • @markcatton1484
      @markcatton1484 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fw190 landing in Kent by mistake gave the secret of keeping a close cowled radial cool to the allies. Hence similar looking lines at the front.

    • @wetzel1628
      @wetzel1628 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They did get inspiration from a captured fw190. The Germans had the right idea for closely cowled radials. They just couldn’t squeeze enough power out of their bmw801 to make it a superprop like this thing

  • @johncrispin2118
    @johncrispin2118 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surely the masterpiece of Sidney Camms piston fighters but just perhaps a year too late. From the Hurricane onwards the Kingston team produced these
    Excellent aircraft culminating in the Furies predecessors of Typhoon and Tempest 11, just want to see Nick Grace get that one in the sky.

  • @billyvan8362
    @billyvan8362 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful plane..

  • @AndyB59
    @AndyB59 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have people nothing better to do than natter during such an epic display with such a brilliant soundtrack?

    • @HighFlight
      @HighFlight  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So true. You wouldn't believe how frustrating it is when this happens when I'm filming. People I'm with know when to be quiet, but unfortunately most people are totally unable to do so. Silence really is golden!

  • @PorscheGTRSWeissach
    @PorscheGTRSWeissach 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Okay! Nice comments here! It's a beautiful aircraft and that sound! Music to my ears! Better than US PW engines! They sound more like Dragsters...
    HonestIy, I never liked Hurricanes and early Spitfires but I do love the successors Fury, Sea Fury, Griffon Spitfires, Spitful/Seafang, MB.3 and the Hornet! Ultimate british piston engined fighters and prototypes of their time! Unfortunately most of them not existing anymore and also, the Jet-age made them obsolete... I will love piston engine sound forever! ;-)

    • @stuartwillardscreenworx4035
      @stuartwillardscreenworx4035 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are trying to recreate a Hornet, would be stunning to just see one again even if it never flies. Sea Fury and Hornet pilots were very precious about which was the best but who cares both were at the very forefront of piston engined perfection.

  • @danhouse7565
    @danhouse7565 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    these are the kind of airplanes that make me wish jet engines hadnt been invented

  • @ivorbiggun710
    @ivorbiggun710 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love that Centaurus sound.

  • @monsieurcommissaire1628
    @monsieurcommissaire1628 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful sound.
    Kind of like a P & W R2800 with an English accent.
    Edit:
    I just had to add- that was some very nice flying with a masterful, ultra-smooth landing. The video was done very nicely and with a proper soundtrack featuring the mighty Bristol Centaurus.

  • @Perchloroethylene
    @Perchloroethylene 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have one of these engines from a scrapped Blackburn Beverly, hope it sounds this good if I ever get it running again!