The more of it i see the more i like it! I just hope by some miracle this ship to be the candidate for future Greek frigate instead of -Freedom Class- LCS variant! A proper steel made, sturdy and seaworthy frigate! Especially in the FF4923 version, its a great deal!
Lcs are great ships if seen as a corvette, which is really what they are, the work pretty well. A lot of the hate that comes with the lcs is that the lcs replaced our more powerful frigates which wasn't right since the lcs can't take a role of a frigate but it definitely can take a role of a corvette pretty well.
I would like to see a slightly lengthened version with more room to grow, power generation, higher VLS count and multi role modularity. Even as is this is an excellent, affordable, durable alternative to the overpriced and over complicated alternatives on offer such as FREM.
Would have been better than the LCS. Criminal waste of money. Wholesale dispose all of the LCS to friendly small navies and perhaps some to the coast guard need to build new middle cruisers like those envisioned in the 2000s ASAP!
Let's keep in mind that the NSC was not designed under NVR. So, like the LCS, there will be growing pains to navalise the platform and qualify it for shock. Ship will also need a new combat system to replace CGC2 and a new C4I suite to replace Reacue 21. The ship also has limited compartmentalization which would have to be resolved. Beyond that, the engineering plant is awesome. My points should not disqualify the WMSL 750 from consideration.
I agree these ships were built to survive in a low threat environment. I take that to mean ABS standard and not meant to go in harms way, upgrade to a NAVSEA/SUPSHIP would be a issue
This is one of the most Qualified Ship that fit the PN Requirement: Proposed Specification: Main Gun: 76mm Oto Melara Gun Secondary Gun: 25-30mm Gun Missile Capability: 8 Mk 41 VLS (Quadpack) 4x4 Missile Canister (Harpoon/C Star) Length: 127m Width: 18m I wish the Philippine Navy Acquire this ship for the 3rd Horizon.
Sure, it is not the best, but lets be realistic: Is the navy ever going to adopt a foreign design? Likely not. Is the navy going to risk using the LCS platform? Unless, stupid corrupt politicians win, no. Is the navy going to consider adopting a platform that has a few flaws but already has proven to be feasible and that works? Yes. The National Security Cutter was made with the capability to add more weapons in war time. It was designed to be VLS capable, and also to have to ability to mount harpoon SSMs and advanced sonar in case they were needed in wartime to protect the navy. I honestly think that the NSC type design is the best option in this competition. It may not be the best possible choice, but of the options layed out, I would much rather have the NSC than a repeat of the LCS
Gaétan Féry Haha. I personally was leaning toward F100 or NSC, but I guess the navy saw the NSC platform as not large or capable enough, and F100 was going to cost way too much and was basically going to be a scaled-down Burke.
The U.S. Navy and Coast Guard each have particular requirements, yes. But the choice of capabilities, resistance to shock and Ability to carry out different missions will also depend on the per-unit cost and timelines to build. Conceivably the U.S. Navy could load This planned frigate with many capabilities, but if it is too costly or takes too long to build & test, then hard choices have to be made. It is important for the U.S. Navy to get moving on this-with the mature understanding there is no such thing as the ultimate dream vessel.
i dont like it, they should go for a already purpose built fregate, this ship is good enough for coastguard duties but for war you need something else. I would like to see a AEGIS compatible fregate like the F100 Alvaro type
I disagree any ship that can operate in the Bering Sea can operate anywhere I was in the Coast Guard for many years I don't ever remember seeing too many navy ships in that part of the world that's rough the weather is unforgiving it's cold and it's Coast Guard territory that's where we operate just watch Deadliest Catch I remember being in places like Dutch Harbor in the early 1980s when no one ever heard of the place we operated they're constantly and still do today. A ship designed to operate there is tough enough to operate anywhere I would love to see one of LCS ships operating in the aleutians not going to happen.
I agree I don't know why we went to Italy and had to completely rebuild it to the Constitution class when Navantia had everything right out of the box.
If only they could turn this into an extremely fast hybrid-electric design using two smaller high efficiency gas turbines, eliminating the diesels, increasing its speed, and range. This would open its capability to use electromagnetic rail gun technology for the future. Also, clean up the hull to make it more low observable.
@@_R-R That's why you use super high RPM generators directly coupled to the turbine. They run only when needed, and the main battery stores all the power. The hybrid/turbo-electric design, means it runs on electric motors, and not through a transmission system. Two of the primary reasons the existing AGT-1500 is inefficient is when it has to run at lower rpm during shifting, and tons of mechanical losses in the transmission. Electric drive also allows it to run extremely quiet when needed.
These Coast Guard cutters are already too expensive. Great capability for a coast guard, but upgrading to US Navy standards would cost more and building enough of them wouldnt negate the fact.
The more of it i see the more i like it!
I just hope by some miracle this ship to be the candidate for future Greek frigate instead of -Freedom Class- LCS variant!
A proper steel made, sturdy and seaworthy frigate! Especially in the FF4923 version, its a great deal!
Lcs are great ships if seen as a corvette, which is really what they are, the work pretty well. A lot of the hate that comes with the lcs is that the lcs replaced our more powerful frigates which wasn't right since the lcs can't take a role of a frigate but it definitely can take a role of a corvette pretty well.
This what they should have chosen
Yeah they effed up big time...AGAIN!
Agreed.
I would like to see a slightly lengthened version with more room to grow, power generation, higher VLS count and multi role modularity.
Even as is this is an excellent, affordable, durable alternative to the overpriced and over complicated alternatives on offer such as FREM.
me,2. cub cariboo. with a thicker hull and at lease a 6" main cannon forward.
Would have been better than the LCS. Criminal waste of money. Wholesale dispose all of the LCS to friendly small navies and perhaps some to the coast guard need to build new middle cruisers like those envisioned in the 2000s ASAP!
Let's keep in mind that the NSC was not designed under NVR. So, like the LCS, there will be growing pains to navalise the platform and qualify it for shock. Ship will also need a new combat system to replace CGC2 and a new C4I suite to replace Reacue 21. The ship also has limited compartmentalization which would have to be resolved. Beyond that, the engineering plant is awesome. My points should not disqualify the WMSL 750 from consideration.
I agree these ships were
built to survive in a low threat environment. I take that to mean ABS standard and not meant to go in harms way, upgrade to a NAVSEA/SUPSHIP would be a issue
This is one of the most Qualified Ship that fit the PN Requirement:
Proposed Specification:
Main Gun: 76mm Oto Melara Gun
Secondary Gun: 25-30mm Gun
Missile Capability:
8 Mk 41 VLS (Quadpack)
4x4 Missile Canister (Harpoon/C Star)
Length: 127m
Width: 18m
I wish the Philippine Navy Acquire this ship for the 3rd Horizon.
Or a NSM/JSM that can be VLS fitted.
Sure, it is not the best, but lets be realistic: Is the navy ever going to adopt a foreign design? Likely not. Is the navy going to risk using the LCS platform? Unless, stupid corrupt politicians win, no. Is the navy going to consider adopting a platform that has a few flaws but already has proven to be feasible and that works? Yes. The National Security Cutter was made with the capability to add more weapons in war time. It was designed to be VLS capable, and also to have to ability to mount harpoon SSMs and advanced sonar in case they were needed in wartime to protect the navy. I honestly think that the NSC type design is the best option in this competition. It may not be the best possible choice, but of the options layed out, I would much rather have the NSC than a repeat of the LCS
Same.....
Gaétan Féry Haha. I personally was leaning toward F100 or NSC, but I guess the navy saw the NSC platform as not large or capable enough, and F100 was going to cost way too much and was basically going to be a scaled-down Burke.
@@bobjohn2000
I was leaning for a cross between NSC and F100.
CODLAG
32-cell VLS with Aster, ESSM, ASROC
2 helos.
$600-800 mil per hull.
The U.S. Navy and Coast Guard each have particular requirements, yes. But the choice of capabilities, resistance to shock and
Ability to carry out different missions will also depend on the per-unit cost and timelines to build. Conceivably the U.S. Navy could load
This planned frigate with many capabilities, but if it is too costly or takes too long to build & test, then hard choices have to be made. It is important for the U.S. Navy to get moving on this-with the mature understanding there is no such thing as the ultimate dream vessel.
I think they forgot that last part.
Fantastic presentation, im sold!
Where can i buy one and how much are they?
They had me at the VLS.. How much is the down payment and do we have easy financing?
Nice
i dont like it, they should go for a already purpose built fregate, this ship is good enough for coastguard duties but for war you need something else. I would like to see a AEGIS compatible fregate like the F100 Alvaro type
Amen. Have wasted enough money LCS already.
I disagree any ship that can operate in the Bering Sea can operate anywhere I was in the Coast Guard for many years I don't ever remember seeing too many navy ships in that part of the world that's rough the weather is unforgiving it's cold and it's Coast Guard territory that's where we operate just watch Deadliest Catch I remember being in places like Dutch Harbor in the early 1980s when no one ever heard of the place we operated they're constantly and still do today. A ship designed to operate there is tough enough to operate anywhere I would love to see one of LCS ships operating in the aleutians not going to happen.
@@johnwilliamsscuba6487 I rode 378 class in the Bearing Sea. Much better ships than these new ones.
I agree I don't know why we went to Italy and had to completely rebuild it to the Constitution class when Navantia had everything right out of the box.
With some modifications the aegis system they got on Norways frigates this sea control frigate is just what the US navy needs.
We already have an AAW asset. Two actually, the CG-51 and the DDG-51.
🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨👌💪👍
If only they could turn this into an extremely fast hybrid-electric design using two smaller high efficiency gas turbines, eliminating the diesels, increasing its speed, and range. This would open its capability to use electromagnetic rail gun technology for the future. Also, clean up the hull to make it more low observable.
Pure gas turbine propulsion will always have a short range. GTs are efficient at high rpms; increasing fuel consumption.
@@_R-R That's why you use super high RPM generators directly coupled to the turbine. They run only when needed, and the main battery stores all the power. The hybrid/turbo-electric design, means it runs on electric motors, and not through a transmission system. Two of the primary reasons the existing AGT-1500 is inefficient is when it has to run at lower rpm during shifting, and tons of mechanical losses in the transmission. Electric drive also allows it to run extremely quiet when needed.
I don't understand why navy doesn't build off of proven battle tested platforms and make them better.
These Coast Guard cutters are already too expensive. Great capability for a coast guard, but upgrading to US Navy standards would cost more and building enough of them wouldnt negate the fact.
Far cheaper than the lcs
Capable. Low Cost.
If only the Navy higher ups could get their heads out of their asses.
Yea this is the ship they should at the very least go off of!! Basically just militarize it, done.
Fincantieri FREMM are much better!