"PERFECT WORDS CHOSEN" I can understand that kind of hesitation while speaking out the facts, this is very much important for WOMEN like you to come up and speak out the facts. Because if MEN even try to just explain the biological or simple logical facts, they are gonna be humiliated and pulled in to a controversial matter as Let Gen Rajiv Puri is facing currently. I understand the willingness of the Women to come up and join indian Army's infantry as well as the most of the elite forces as SF. But if that is the situation then it is also a concern that something dealing with life and death and the reputation of the nation can't be risked. So with due respect women also has to do equal harsh training as that of men and be habitual with that kind of language and treatment given be males, no special women batches will be for that purpose, breaking bones, surviving sleepless weeks, each and every harshest element of life without being treated as a WOMEN but a SOLDIER. See I am just writing this on behalf of the mature MENS and also hope that no much justification is needed. Khushboo ma'am has explained the fact and kept her opinion very wisely, thus I also thought of thanking her and add some of my views. Women and Men together are the pillars of the society, instead I would say THE PILLARS OF HEALTHY WORLD. If we start competing with each other and fighting on the matters which are not meant for comparison, but for understanding that whose role it is then it's gonna be worse and conflicting. Thank you very much ma'am, your words pleased me, and i totally accept tha fact as a MAN that certain in certain (quantitatively equal) tasks WOMEN are far far more better than MEN, and vice versa. Please try to understand, don't rise conflicts. RESPECT 🤝🇮🇳 JAI HIND
My dear illogical daughter, You began your video with the point that "national security should be above gender equality." Let me remind you that this is not a groundbreaking thought but a well-established principle in the Indian Armed Forces and many other militaries worldwide. It’s an old and repetitive statement and not your original conviction. Simply repeating it doesn’t contribute anything meaningful to the discussion. Next, you veered into preaching with statements like, "I don’t need to prove myself because I’m already better within myself." This is both illogical and unrealistic. It seems you’ve been influenced by shallow social media content rather than critical thinking. Let me clarify: life demands that you prove yourself at every step. If you were recommended by the SSB (Service Selection Board), it’s precisely because you demonstrated your capabilities and proved your potential. SSB is a projection test where your performance is critically assessed. In the academy, you would have to prove yourself as a cadet. As an officer, you’ll need to repeatedly prove yourself, rank by rank, because your performance will be evaluated yearly in your ACR (Annual Confidential Report). Following Major General Rajeev Puri’s letter, all lady officers must now prove their leadership, starting from their academy days. After three minutes, I stopped watching your video because your arguments lacked basic logic. Even the very foundation of a family-your parents’ marriage-requires them to prove their commitment and compatibility with one another. If you cannot understand this fundamental aspect of life, how can you contribute meaningfully to such a complex debate? After serving in the armed forces for more than half your age, let me share some advice: If someone were to ask my opinion on this matter, I’d say, “I have no opinion.” Why? This isn’t a debate of views; it’s a matter of decisions made by those in authority based on situational realities. General Puri’s letter is likely a measured response to specific instances of leadership concerns, not a sweeping generalisation. Among the eight women officers mentioned it’s evident that someone-or more than one-displayed a lack of leadership, leading to a situational conclusion by General Rajeev Puri. As a sniper, I’ve learned one fundamental truth: “A good camouflage attracts no bullet.” This wisdom underscores the importance of staying quiet and avoiding unnecessary entanglements. Similarly, neither your age nor your lack of firsthand military experience equips you to grasp the nuances of this debate, so please stop your this programmed by someone scripted preaching. Please don’t waste your time-and others’-with uninformed and shallow statements. First, work on understanding the basic principles of life and leadership. Only then can you engage in meaningful, informed discussions that contribute value. . Your Big daddy Read my book Awaken Yourself Within You. That is better than your bakchodi. Not for you but for her. But I liked your comment
Every point you mentioned is absolutely valid, and I appreciate the detailed insights. However, I feel the conclusion is still unclear. Let me explain my perspective: the facts you presented seem more aligned with branches like Infantry, Armored, and Mechanized Infantry, where women are not currently posted. The report we are discussing focuses on women Commanding Officers (COs) leading backend units. These units are the support arms of Infantry and other operational units, dealing primarily with logistics, services, and intelligence. These roles typically do not require the same level of physical strength or direct combat involvement as frontline units. Given this distinction, I am trying to understand why questions about women’s capabilities or leadership skills arise in these contexts. If these positions don't demand significant physical power, why is there skepticism about women excelling as leaders in these sectors? Moreover, what could be the potential solution to address this mindset? From your video, I got the impression that women should not hold leadership roles even in these sectors. Is that the intended takeaway, or is there a more nuanced point that I missed?
Lack of empathy mentioned by the lt. Gen. Was given with the example as one of the lady CO's denied coming out of the vehicle untill the units SM(senior most JCO, having service not less than of 30 years) opens the doors for her, I truly admit that their are male CO as well who have dominating style of leadership, but this level of disrespect to jawans is unimaginable. Males on the hand go through same hardships be it in training or during exercise or during combat experience etc. Where as the women officers are sheltered and nurtured thus they have lack of sympathy towards jawans.
Agree with a lot of points but also I think many women since they were a child, in one way or the other have faced this kind of situation where they have felt she is not better than a man, not just inn physical tasks but in other things also sometimes she have to out do herself to prove that she is good at something, so this kind of experience sometimes makes you kind of unempathetic also, bcoz u r just programed now in a way that you have to be rock solid, now comes my 2nd point that their are a lot of good men around us but their are also some men who, when commanded by a Man, they will be pissed but still they'll think that oh it is fine ye to senior hai (no male ego is involved in that level) but if the same men are commanded by a Woman then they get a lil' bit pissed off also, but obv I am not talking about all men. (if u r a girl and u think that above mentioned points are incorrect then their are high chances u come from a priviledged background where men around u are really well adverse and educated and understand that women also have the capabiity of becoming a first class leader and hence why u have not experienced much of these situations). Now there are a lot of points said by Lt. gen puri sir, which I read and i was just like.....why woulc u add gender to these? these things can be done by any other CO and ppl really do that, there are these kind of ppl in every gender, so that was wrong in his part and I think there is nothing wrong in calling wrong the wrong in sir's letter also, especially when sir's letter itself is his opinions about the wrongs that he think is being happening.Anyways your opinions are great and I felt really nice watching a girl give her opinions so clearly , (I just think in the part where u said u don't think u need to be empowered, u should mention that it is bcoz of ur life exeriences and ur parents but not every or even majority of girls are not that privileged, i think it is very imp to mention that bcoz young boys now a days often listen to these statements and think ki sabhi ladkiyo ki situation to acchi he hai jaise hamare ghar ki hai, hamari bhn to acche se he hai sari opportunities use milti hai, so just to make everyone aware of things, it is imp to mention these things also).
19:05 because they are physically and biologically different.....then why always compare male and female ..and there o hme neecha dikhate hain ...simple hai bahut sari cheej hai jo women kr sakti hai but men nhi and vice versa(in every system not specially in army )..jo aap kr sakte ho o kro aur jo hm kr sakte hain o hme krne do ...READ MY COMMUNITY POST
@@Payal..akhandbharat you just called me "kam buddhi"....that shows your culture and arrogance... that's why Lt. General Puri told you woman are bad for Indian army. I belong from 3rd generation army family..infact I am going join join Indian army as officer probably next year...... Here I am saying again "woman in army in combat is a joke...!" Woman in supportive role of Indian army is fantastic.
@@Payal..akhandbharat you are nothing but a arrogant woman who thinks she is better than a man. I am in my last year....6ft tall, perfect weight, 1 mile run time 5in 10 sec (current) , can do 15 pull up in a go. Now tell me do you really thinks with this qualification and with this physical parameters any normal woman (including you) would beat me any be a better eligible for Indian army officer ????? Women are in Indian army in combat roles for sake of loop holes in constitution and fake feminism 🙌. Women in combat is a mere joke.
@@prabhuramkrishna are you mad ? I am talking about all systems ..can your father run your family better than you mother ...I am not talking specially about any system...kaha se aate ho baat samjhte nhi ...and jaankari ke liye bta du in military nursing service there are 0 men and about 4000 women ....aur maine sirf army ke liye nhi kaha hr ek system ke liye kaha hai ...baat to samjha kro ki bs question puchna hai ...tumhe kya samjhau mai baccha padho bs tum ....Army ko samjhne ke liye army join krna padta hai jo ki tum nhi ho ...
I add further on it. I looked at Gen Puri’s views critically and they did not appear to be vindictive although generalization based on only eight COs. It was probably observation based rather than a valid study conducted scientifically. My first impression a well-designed study must be conducted and if there is any truth corrective measures should be instituted beginning from the Academy level. Waiting for the door to be opened is a ridiculous wish for a CO who is a part and parcel of his men. Similarly complaining at the drop,of a hat to a Brigadier sounds like a typic womanish tendency. Nari Shakthi is a political stunt of gender equality. It is alright their participation is. Currently limited to technical branches, the Airforce and Navy have them too. If the foreign militaries have them it does not mean we should have them too. There is no shortage of men volunteering for all branches. Politicians are swayed by the term Nari Shakthi, and the Pan Masala chewing illiterate politicians know nothing of battle to serve in any branch is difficult and associated with great risk. In WW 2 Russia mobilized and more than 400,000 were front linen troops. When they were caught by Germans they were often raped, tortured and shot.Field Marshal Gunther von Kluge COmof German 4th Army ordered the Russian women soldiers to be shot on sight. We know. what happened to captured women pilots and other women army persons in Gulf War.
Lady- my guess is you are an army brat and your views are realistic. When I first heard from Maj Gen Yashmor Saab, I wrote a largem lengthy comment on it.
Since the beginning, I have been asking only one question, how women into military is going to improve productivity even by 1%. Just sounds cool, that's it. At the end, I wasn't wrong though.
Don't miss it My dear illogical daughter, You began your video with the point that "national security should be above gender equality." Let me remind you that this is not a groundbreaking thought but a well-established principle in the Indian Armed Forces and many other militaries worldwide. It’s an old and repetitive statement and not your original conviction. Simply repeating it doesn’t contribute anything meaningful to the discussion. Next, you veered into preaching with statements like, "I don’t need to prove myself because I’m already better within myself." This is both illogical and unrealistic. It seems you’ve been influenced by shallow social media content rather than critical thinking. Let me clarify: life demands that you prove yourself at every step. If you were recommended by the SSB (Service Selection Board), it’s precisely because you demonstrated your capabilities and proved your potential. SSB is a projection test where your performance is critically assessed. In the academy, you would have to prove yourself as a cadet. As an officer, you’ll need to repeatedly prove yourself, rank by rank, because your performance will be evaluated yearly in your ACR (Annual Confidential Report). Following Major General Rajeev Puri’s letter, all lady officers must now prove their leadership, starting from their academy days. After three minutes, I stopped watching your video because your arguments lacked basic logic. Even the very foundation of a family-your parents’ marriage-requires them to prove their commitment and compatibility with one another. If you cannot understand this fundamental aspect of life, how can you contribute meaningfully to such a complex debate? After serving in the armed forces for more than half your age, let me share some advice: If someone were to ask my opinion on this matter, I’d say, “I have no opinion.” Why? This isn’t a debate of views; it’s a matter of decisions made by those in authority based on situational realities. General Puri’s letter is likely a measured response to specific instances of leadership concerns, not a sweeping generalisation. Among the eight women officers mentioned it’s evident that someone-or more than one-displayed a lack of leadership, leading to a situational conclusion by General Rajeev Puri. As a sniper, I’ve learned one fundamental truth: “A good camouflage attracts no bullet.” This wisdom underscores the importance of staying quiet and avoiding unnecessary entanglements. Similarly, neither your age nor your lack of firsthand military experience equips you to grasp the nuances of this debate, so please stop your this programmed by someone scripted preaching. Please don’t waste your time-and others’-with uninformed and shallow statements. First, work on understanding the basic principles of life and leadership. Only then can you engage in meaningful, informed discussions that contribute value. . Your Big daddy Read my book Awaken Yourself Within You. That is better than your bakchodi.
Appreciate your thinking nation first before gender equality ....we should try women in different fields but if things are not getting right then we should be flexible enough to focus on betterment not liberal ideas...women have done well in many fields which needs to be appreciated and encouraged...
In my opinion the army should be little considerate in treating women officers !! And better to let the man do the roles that are needed to be done !! When he said ego issue we think ego means just rude self centred but it might be the rigidity to do certain things to prove themselves that might not be possible by women officers to do !! Being empathetic and compassionate is a quality of feminine energy that is not gender related men also have feminine!!but physically musculine is best expressesed
it's a wonderful explanation... and I think this all went wrong because a letter which was meant for internal review became open to public judgment... there should be a proper survey now to actually decide whats best for the nation and move in that way ahead as national security cant be compromised for gender equality also the content of the letter is straight forward however the public opinion is brutal too, it would be disheartening for the lady officers to face it as they put their heart and soul at work....
about that car door point even male officers make jawans do that, jawans have to clean officers house clothes and numerous other things which is just disrespectful for them. ngl never liked this attitude of officers and their families have towards lower ranks
Why don’t they understand that ARMY is not ment for you , we don’t need you anymore in army . Why to accept substandard things when better option is available.
This video best describe how you actually process things and how much mature u actually are. Sister you are empathetic, sweet spoken great. But you lack rationality majority of the points you made made no sense, were majorly generalisation, nothing else. You might have been selected for ssb but i don't really think you've even properly analysed the letter. Even school going kids make better understanding of the same. Trust me majority of the audience here are males and are agreeing to u just coz of your beauty, you really lacks practicality towards things and understanding other pov.
Protect her at all costs ✅️✅️✅️✅️
Where do we find a woman like this in todays generation?? 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
In kitchen?
Perfect example of how a high value feminine woman looks like 👍
She always speaks at the peak of sincere factuality 🇮🇳
i hope Palki Sharma watches this video
4:23
True ,
Gender neutrality par nhi , ability par recruitment karo ,
Fir chahe 100% men or 100% womwn ka selection ho
"PERFECT WORDS CHOSEN"
I can understand that kind of hesitation while speaking out the facts, this is very much important for WOMEN like you to come up and speak out the facts. Because if MEN even try to just explain the biological or simple logical facts, they are gonna be humiliated and pulled in to a controversial matter as Let Gen Rajiv Puri is facing currently.
I understand the willingness of the Women to come up and join indian Army's infantry as well as the most of the elite forces as SF. But if that is the situation then it is also a concern that something dealing with life and death and the reputation of the nation can't be risked. So with due respect women also has to do equal harsh training as that of men and be habitual with that kind of language and treatment given be males, no special women batches will be for that purpose, breaking bones, surviving sleepless weeks, each and every harshest element of life without being treated as a WOMEN but a SOLDIER.
See I am just writing this on behalf of the mature MENS and also hope that no much justification is needed. Khushboo ma'am has explained the fact and kept her opinion very wisely, thus I also thought of thanking her and add some of my views.
Women and Men together are the pillars of the society, instead I would say THE PILLARS OF HEALTHY WORLD. If we start competing with each other and fighting on the matters which are not meant for comparison, but for understanding that whose role it is then it's gonna be worse and conflicting.
Thank you very much ma'am, your words pleased me, and i totally accept tha fact as a MAN that certain in certain (quantitatively equal) tasks WOMEN are far far more better than MEN, and vice versa.
Please try to understand, don't rise conflicts.
RESPECT 🤝🇮🇳
JAI HIND
My dear illogical daughter,
You began your video with the point that "national security should be above gender equality." Let me remind you that this is not a groundbreaking thought but a well-established principle in the Indian Armed Forces and many other militaries worldwide. It’s an old and repetitive statement and not your original conviction. Simply repeating it doesn’t contribute anything meaningful to the discussion.
Next, you veered into preaching with statements like, "I don’t need to prove myself because I’m already better within myself." This is both illogical and unrealistic. It seems you’ve been influenced by shallow social media content rather than critical thinking. Let me clarify: life demands that you prove yourself at every step. If you were recommended by the SSB (Service Selection Board), it’s precisely because you demonstrated your capabilities and proved your potential. SSB is a projection test where your performance is critically assessed.
In the academy, you would have to prove yourself as a cadet. As an officer, you’ll need to repeatedly prove yourself, rank by rank, because your performance will be evaluated yearly in your ACR (Annual Confidential Report). Following Major General Rajeev Puri’s letter, all lady officers must now prove their leadership, starting from their academy days.
After three minutes, I stopped watching your video because your arguments lacked basic logic. Even the very foundation of a family-your parents’ marriage-requires them to prove their commitment and compatibility with one another. If you cannot understand this fundamental aspect of life, how can you contribute meaningfully to such a complex debate?
After serving in the armed forces for more than half your age, let me share some advice: If someone were to ask my opinion on this matter, I’d say, “I have no opinion.” Why? This isn’t a debate of views; it’s a matter of decisions made by those in authority based on situational realities. General Puri’s letter is likely a measured response to specific instances of leadership concerns, not a sweeping generalisation. Among the eight women officers mentioned it’s evident that someone-or more than one-displayed a lack of leadership, leading to a situational conclusion by General Rajeev Puri.
As a sniper, I’ve learned one fundamental truth: “A good camouflage attracts no bullet.” This wisdom underscores the importance of staying quiet and avoiding unnecessary entanglements. Similarly, neither your age nor your lack of firsthand military experience equips you to grasp the nuances of this debate, so please stop your this programmed by someone scripted preaching.
Please don’t waste your time-and others’-with uninformed and shallow statements. First, work on understanding the basic principles of life and leadership. Only then can you engage in meaningful, informed discussions that contribute value.
.
Your Big daddy
Read my book Awaken Yourself Within You. That is better than your bakchodi.
Not for you but for her. But I liked your comment
Every point you mentioned is absolutely valid, and I appreciate the detailed insights. However, I feel the conclusion is still unclear. Let me explain my perspective: the facts you presented seem more aligned with branches like Infantry, Armored, and Mechanized Infantry, where women are not currently posted.
The report we are discussing focuses on women Commanding Officers (COs) leading backend units. These units are the support arms of Infantry and other operational units, dealing primarily with logistics, services, and intelligence. These roles typically do not require the same level of physical strength or direct combat involvement as frontline units.
Given this distinction, I am trying to understand why questions about women’s capabilities or leadership skills arise in these contexts. If these positions don't demand significant physical power, why is there skepticism about women excelling as leaders in these sectors? Moreover, what could be the potential solution to address this mindset? From your video, I got the impression that women should not hold leadership roles even in these sectors. Is that the intended takeaway, or is there a more nuanced point that I missed?
Finally someone who understand empowerment that too being gender neutral! °_°
Lack of empathy mentioned by the lt. Gen. Was given with the example as one of the lady CO's denied coming out of the vehicle untill the units SM(senior most JCO, having service not less than of 30 years) opens the doors for her, I truly admit that their are male CO as well who have dominating style of leadership, but this level of disrespect to jawans is unimaginable. Males on the hand go through same hardships be it in training or during exercise or during combat experience etc. Where as the women officers are sheltered and nurtured thus they have lack of sympathy towards jawans.
Agree with a lot of points but also I think many women since they were a child, in one way or the other have faced this kind of situation where they have felt she is not better than a man, not just inn physical tasks but in other things also sometimes she have to out do herself to prove that she is good at something, so this kind of experience sometimes makes you kind of unempathetic also, bcoz u r just programed now in a way that you have to be rock solid, now comes my 2nd point that their are a lot of good men around us but their are also some men who, when commanded by a Man, they will be pissed but still they'll think that oh it is fine ye to senior hai (no male ego is involved in that level) but if the same men are commanded by a Woman then they get a lil' bit pissed off also, but obv I am not talking about all men. (if u r a girl and u think that above mentioned points are incorrect then their are high chances u come from a priviledged background where men around u are really well adverse and educated and understand that women also have the capabiity of becoming a first class leader and hence why u have not experienced much of these situations). Now there are a lot of points said by Lt. gen puri sir, which I read and i was just like.....why woulc u add gender to these? these things can be done by any other CO and ppl really do that, there are these kind of ppl in every gender, so that was wrong in his part and I think there is nothing wrong in calling wrong the wrong in sir's letter also, especially when sir's letter itself is his opinions about the wrongs that he think is being happening.Anyways your opinions are great and I felt really nice watching a girl give her opinions so clearly , (I just think in the part where u said u don't think u need to be empowered, u should mention that it is bcoz of ur life exeriences and ur parents but not every or even majority of girls are not that privileged, i think it is very imp to mention that bcoz young boys now a days often listen to these statements and think ki sabhi ladkiyo ki situation to acchi he hai jaise hamare ghar ki hai, hamari bhn to acche se he hai sari opportunities use milti hai, so just to make everyone aware of things, it is imp to mention these things also).
Nicely explained your POV. Similar thoughts.
I think you are not joining the academy. (Answer is in the video itself) we got your point. and I'm as an UPSC aspirant agree with you...Jai Hind!
19:05 because they are physically and biologically different.....then why always compare male and female ..and there o hme neecha dikhate hain ...simple hai bahut sari cheej hai jo women kr sakti hai but men nhi and vice versa(in every system not specially in army )..jo aap kr sakte ho o kro aur jo hm kr sakte hain o hme krne do ...READ MY COMMUNITY POST
I am from IIT Madras ....I know who got less brain@@Payal..akhandbharat
@@Payal..akhandbharat you just called me "kam buddhi"....that shows your culture and arrogance... that's why Lt. General Puri told you woman are bad for Indian army.
I belong from 3rd generation army family..infact I am going join join Indian army as officer probably next year......
Here I am saying again "woman in army in combat is a joke...!"
Woman in supportive role of Indian army is fantastic.
@@Payal..akhandbharat you are nothing but a arrogant woman who thinks she is better than a man.
I am in my last year....6ft tall, perfect weight, 1 mile run time 5in 10 sec (current) , can do 15 pull up in a go.
Now tell me do you really thinks with this qualification and with this physical parameters any normal woman (including you) would beat me any be a better eligible for Indian army officer ?????
Women are in Indian army in combat roles for sake of loop holes in constitution and fake feminism 🙌. Women in combat is a mere joke.
@@prabhuramkrishna are you mad ? I am talking about all systems ..can your father run your family better than you mother ...I am not talking specially about any system...kaha se aate ho baat samjhte nhi ...and jaankari ke liye bta du in military nursing service there are 0 men and about 4000 women ....aur maine sirf army ke liye nhi kaha hr ek system ke liye kaha hai ...baat to samjha kro ki bs question puchna hai ...tumhe kya samjhau mai baccha padho bs tum ....Army ko samjhne ke liye army join krna padta hai jo ki tum nhi ho ...
hahaha....oh please IIT MADRAS😂@@prabhuramkrishna
❤ the real women
I add further on it. I looked at Gen Puri’s views critically and they did not appear to be vindictive although generalization based on only eight COs. It was probably observation based rather than a valid study conducted scientifically. My first impression a well-designed study must be conducted and if there is any truth corrective measures should be instituted beginning from the Academy level. Waiting for the door to be opened is a ridiculous wish for a CO who is a part and parcel of his men. Similarly complaining at the drop,of a hat to a Brigadier sounds like a typic womanish tendency. Nari Shakthi is a political stunt of gender equality. It is alright their participation is. Currently limited to technical branches, the Airforce and Navy have them too. If the foreign militaries have them it does not mean we should have them too. There is no shortage of men volunteering for all branches. Politicians are swayed by the term Nari Shakthi, and the Pan Masala chewing illiterate politicians know nothing of battle to serve in any branch is difficult and associated with great risk. In WW 2 Russia mobilized and more than 400,000 were front linen troops. When they were caught by Germans they were often raped, tortured and shot.Field Marshal Gunther von Kluge COmof German 4th Army ordered the Russian women soldiers to be shot on sight. We know. what happened to captured women pilots and other women army persons in Gulf War.
Thank you so much for talking about this issue....they think we are weak but no....🇮🇳🫡..1st of all we are humans ..then treat like as human .....
Lady- my guess is you are an army brat and your views are realistic. When I first heard from Maj Gen Yashmor Saab, I wrote a largem lengthy comment on it.
Since the beginning, I have been asking only one question, how women into military is going to improve productivity even by 1%. Just sounds cool, that's it. At the end, I wasn't wrong though.
Don't miss it
My dear illogical daughter,
You began your video with the point that "national security should be above gender equality." Let me remind you that this is not a groundbreaking thought but a well-established principle in the Indian Armed Forces and many other militaries worldwide. It’s an old and repetitive statement and not your original conviction. Simply repeating it doesn’t contribute anything meaningful to the discussion.
Next, you veered into preaching with statements like, "I don’t need to prove myself because I’m already better within myself." This is both illogical and unrealistic. It seems you’ve been influenced by shallow social media content rather than critical thinking. Let me clarify: life demands that you prove yourself at every step. If you were recommended by the SSB (Service Selection Board), it’s precisely because you demonstrated your capabilities and proved your potential. SSB is a projection test where your performance is critically assessed.
In the academy, you would have to prove yourself as a cadet. As an officer, you’ll need to repeatedly prove yourself, rank by rank, because your performance will be evaluated yearly in your ACR (Annual Confidential Report). Following Major General Rajeev Puri’s letter, all lady officers must now prove their leadership, starting from their academy days.
After three minutes, I stopped watching your video because your arguments lacked basic logic. Even the very foundation of a family-your parents’ marriage-requires them to prove their commitment and compatibility with one another. If you cannot understand this fundamental aspect of life, how can you contribute meaningfully to such a complex debate?
After serving in the armed forces for more than half your age, let me share some advice: If someone were to ask my opinion on this matter, I’d say, “I have no opinion.” Why? This isn’t a debate of views; it’s a matter of decisions made by those in authority based on situational realities. General Puri’s letter is likely a measured response to specific instances of leadership concerns, not a sweeping generalisation. Among the eight women officers mentioned it’s evident that someone-or more than one-displayed a lack of leadership, leading to a situational conclusion by General Rajeev Puri.
As a sniper, I’ve learned one fundamental truth: “A good camouflage attracts no bullet.” This wisdom underscores the importance of staying quiet and avoiding unnecessary entanglements. Similarly, neither your age nor your lack of firsthand military experience equips you to grasp the nuances of this debate, so please stop your this programmed by someone scripted preaching.
Please don’t waste your time-and others’-with uninformed and shallow statements. First, work on understanding the basic principles of life and leadership. Only then can you engage in meaningful, informed discussions that contribute value.
.
Your Big daddy
Read my book Awaken Yourself Within You. That is better than your bakchodi.
Appreciate your thinking nation first before gender equality ....we should try women in different fields but if things are not getting right then we should be flexible enough to focus on betterment not liberal ideas...women have done well in many fields which needs to be appreciated and encouraged...
We r better, we can be better but not by comparing with men 😊😊
😊 totally agree with you mam
pretty good analysis
In my opinion the army should be little considerate in treating women officers !! And better to let the man do the roles that are needed to be done !! When he said ego issue we think ego means just rude self centred but it might be the rigidity to do certain things to prove themselves that might not be possible by women officers to do !! Being empathetic and compassionate is a quality of feminine energy that is not gender related men also have feminine!!but physically musculine is best expressesed
Kya aap join nhi karogi academy
Nhi kregi !!
it's a wonderful explanation... and I think this all went wrong because a letter which was meant for internal review became open to public judgment... there should be a proper survey now to actually decide whats best for the nation and move in that way ahead as national security cant be compromised for gender equality also the content of the letter is straight forward however the public opinion is brutal too, it would be disheartening for the lady officers to face it as they put their heart and soul at work....
about that car door point even male officers make jawans do that, jawans have to clean officers house clothes and numerous other things which is just disrespectful for them. ngl never liked this attitude of officers and their families have towards lower ranks
Why don’t they understand that ARMY is not ment for you , we don’t need you anymore in army . Why to accept substandard things when better option is available.
In sunny deol voice"madam ji aap bohot preety ho"❤
Good,same view of mine also.
ryt
👍nice
This video best describe how you actually process things and how much mature u actually are. Sister you are empathetic, sweet spoken great. But you lack rationality majority of the points you made made no sense, were majorly generalisation, nothing else. You might have been selected for ssb but i don't really think you've even properly analysed the letter. Even school going kids make better understanding of the same. Trust me majority of the audience here are males and are agreeing to u just coz of your beauty, you really lacks practicality towards things and understanding other pov.
Good